WAP Architecture
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Wireless Application Protocol
`Architecture Specification
`
`Disclaimer:
`
`This document is subject to change without notice.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 1
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 2 (20)
`
`Contents
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................................3
`
`DOCUMENT STATUS...................................................................................................................................4
`
`2.1
`2.2
`2.3
`
`COPYRIGHT NOTICE..................................................................................................................................4
`ERRATA ....................................................................................................................................................4
`COMMENTS...............................................................................................................................................4
`
`3.
`
`REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................5
`
`3.1
`3.2
`
`NORMATIVE REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................5
`INFORMATIVE REFERENCES......................................................................................................................5
`
`4.
`
`DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS.....................................................................................................7
`
`4.1
`4.2
`
`DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................................7
`ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................................7
`
`5.
`
`BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................................9
`
`5.1
`5.2
`
`MOTIVATION.............................................................................................................................................9
`REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................................................9
`
`6.
`
`ARCHITECTURE OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................11
`
`6.1
`6.2
`6.3
`6.4
`
`THE WORLD-WIDE WEB MODEL............................................................................................................11
`THE WAP MODEL..................................................................................................................................12
`EXAMPLE WAP NETWORK.....................................................................................................................13
`SECURITY MODEL...................................................................................................................................13
`
`7.
`
`COMPONENTS OF THE WAP ARCHITECTURE.................................................................................15
`
`7.1
`7.2
`7.3
`7.4
`7.5
`7.6
`7.7
`7.8
`
`WIRELESS APPLICATION ENVIRONMENT (WAE) ....................................................................................15
`WIRELESS SESSION PROTOCOL (WSP) ...................................................................................................16
`WIRELESS TRANSACTION PROTOCOL (WTP)..........................................................................................16
`WIRELESS TRANSPORT LAYER SECURITY (WTLS) ................................................................................16
`WIRELESS DATAGRAM PROTOCOL (WDP) .............................................................................................17
`BEARERS ................................................................................................................................................17
`OTHER SERVICES AND APPLICATIONS.....................................................................................................17
`SAMPLE CONFIGURATIONS OF WAP TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................17
`
`COMPLIANCE AND INTEROPERABILITY ..........................................................................................19
`
`FUTURE WORK ITEMS.............................................................................................................................20
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 2
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 3 (20)
`
`1. Scope
`The Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) is a result of the WAP Forum’s efforts to promote industry-wide
`specifications for technology useful in developing applications and services that operate over wireless
`communication networks. WAP specifies an application framework and network protocols for wireless devices
`such as mobile telephones, pagers, and personal digital assistants (PDAs). The specifications extend and leverage
`mobile networking technologies (such as digital data networking standards) and Internet technologies (such as
`XML, URLs, scripting, and various content formats). The effort is aimed at enabling operators, manufacturers, and
`content developers to meet the challenges in building advanced differentiated services and implementations in a
`fast and flexible manner.
`
`The objectives of the WAP Forum are:
`• To bring Internet content and advanced data services to digital cellular phones and other wireless terminals.
`• To create a global wireless protocol specification that will work across differing wireless network
`technologies.
`• To enable the creation of content and applications that scale across a very wide range of bearer networks
`and device types.
`• To embrace and extend existing standards and technology wherever appropriate.
`
`The WAP Architecture Specification is intended to present the system and protocol architectures essential to
`achieving the objectives of the WAP Forum. The WAP Architecture Specification acts as the starting point for
`understanding the WAP technologies and resulting specifications. As such, it provides an overview of the different
`technologies and references the appropriate specifications for further details.
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 3
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 4 (20)
`
`2. Document Status
`This document is available online in the following formats:
`
`• PDF format at http://www.wapforum.org/.
`
`2.1 Copyright Notice
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998. All rights reserved.
`
`2.2 Errata
`
`Known problems associated with this document are published at http://www.wapforum.org/.
`
`2.3 Comments
`
`Comments regarding this document can be submitted to the WAP Forum in the manner published at
`http://www.wapforum.org/.
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 4
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 5 (20)
`
`3. References
`
`3.1 Normative References
`
`[RFC2119]
`
`[WAEoview]
`
`[WAE]
`
`[WAP]
`
`"Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", S. Bradner, March 1997.
`URL: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2119.txt
`
`"Wireless Application Environment Overview", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`"Wireless Application Environment Specification", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`"Wireless Application Protocol Architecture Specification", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998
`URL: http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`[WAPConf]
`
`"Wireless Application Protocol Conformance Statement, Compliance Profile, and Release
`List", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL: http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`[WDP]
`
`[WML]
`
`"Wireless Datagram Protocol Specification", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`"Wireless Markup Language", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`[WMLScript]
`
`"Wireless Markup Language Script", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`[WMLSStdLib]
`
`"Wireless Markup Language Script Standard Libraries", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998.
`URL: http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`[WSP]
`
`[WTA]
`
`[WTAI]
`
`[WTLS]
`
`[WTP]
`
`"Wireless Session Protocol", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`"Wireless Telephony Application Specification", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`"Wireless Telephony Application Interface", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`"Wireless Transport Layer Security Protocol", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`"Wireless Transaction Protocol Specification", WAP Forum, April 30, 1998. URL:
`http://www.wapforum.org/
`
`3.2 Informative References
`
`[ECMAScript]
`
`Standard ECMA-262: "ECMAScript Language Specification", ECMA, June 1997
`
`[HTML4]
`
`[JavaScript]
`
`[RFC1738]
`
`"HTML 4.0 Specification, W3C Recommendation 18-December-1997, REC-HTML40-
`971218", D. Raggett, et al., September 17, 1997. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-
`html40
`
`"JavaScript: The Definitive Guide", David Flanagan. O’Reilly & Associates, Inc. 1997
`
`"Uniform Resource Locators (URL)", T. Berners-Lee, et al., December 1994. URL:
`ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1738.txt
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 5
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 6 (20)
`
`[RFC1808]
`
`[RFC2045]
`
`[RFC2048]
`
`[RFC2068]
`
`"Relative Uniform Resource Locators", R. Fielding, June 1995. URL: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-
`notes/rfc1808.txt
`
`"Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message
`Bodies", N. Freed, et al., November 1996. URL: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2045.txt
`
`"Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Four: Registration Procedures", N.
`Freed, et al., November 1996. URL: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2048.txt
`
`"Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1", R. Fielding, et al., January 1997. URL:
`ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2068.txt
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 6
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 7 (20)
`
`4. Definitions and Abbreviations
`
`4.1 Definitions
`
`The following are terms and conventions used throughout this specification.
`
`The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD
`NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY" and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
`[RFC2119].
`
`Author – an author is a person or program that writes or generates WML, WMLScript or other content.
`
`Client – a device (or application) that initiates a request for a connection with a server.
`
`Content – subject matter (data) stored or generated at an origin server. Content is typically displayed or
`interpreted by a user agent in response to a user request.
`
`Content Encoding – when used as a verb, content encoding indicates the act of converting content from one
`format to another. Typically the resulting format requires less physical space than the original, is easier to process
`or store and/or is encrypted. When used as a noun, content encoding specifies a particular format or encoding
`standard or process.
`
`Content Format – actual representation of content.
`
`Device – a network entity that is capable of sending and receiving packets of information and has a unique device
`address. A device can act as both a client or a server within a given context or across multiple contexts. For
`example, a device can service a number of clients (as a server) while being a client to another server.
`
`JavaScript – a de facto standard language that can be used to add dynamic behaviour to HTML documents.
`JavaScript is one of the originating technologies of ECMAScript.
`
`Man-Machine Interface – a synonym for user interface.
`
`Origin Server – the server on which a given resource resides or is to be created. Often referred to as a web server
`or an HTTP server.
`
`Resource – a network data object or service that can be identified by a URL. Resources may be available in
`multiple representations (eg, multiple languages, data formats, size and resolutions) or vary in other ways.
`
`Server – a device (or application) that passively waits for connection requests from one or more clients. A server
`may accept or reject a connection request from a client.
`
`Terminal – a device providing the user with user agent capabilities, including the ability to request and receive
`information. Also called a mobile terminal or mobile station.
`
`User – a user is a person who interacts with a user agent to view, hear, or otherwise use a resource.
`
`User Agent – a user agent is any software or device that interprets WML, WMLScript, WTAI or other resources.
`This may include textual browsers, voice browsers, search engines, etc.
`
`WMLScript – a scripting language used to program the mobile device. WMLScript is an extended subset of the
`JavaScript(cid:212)
` scripting language.
`
`4.2 Abbreviations
`
`For the purposes of this specification, the following abbreviations apply.
`
`HTML
`
`HyperText Markup Language [HTML4]
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 7
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 8 (20)
`
`HTTP
`MMI
`PDA
`PICS
`RFC
`SSL
`TLS
`URL
`W3C
`WAE
`WAP
`WDP
`WML
`WSP
`WTA
`WTLS
`WTP
`WWW
`
`HyperText Transfer Protocol [RFC2068]
`Man-Machine Interface
`Personal Digital Assistant
`Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement
`Request For Comments
`Secure Sockets Layer
`Transport Layer Security
`Uniform Resource Locator [RFC1738]
`World Wide Web Consortium
`Wireless Application Environment [WAE]
`Wireless Application Protocol [WAP]
`Wireless Datagram Protocol [WDP]
`Wireless Markup Language [WML]
`Wireless Session Protocol [WSP]
`Wireless Telephony Application [WTA]
`Wireless Transport Layer Security [WTLS]
`Wireless Transaction Protocol [WTP]
`World-Wide Web
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 8
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 9 (20)
`
`5. Background
`
`5.1 Motivation
`
`WAP is positioned at the convergence of two rapidly evolving network technologies, wireless data and the Internet.
`Both the wireless data market and the Internet are growing very quickly and are continuously reaching new
`customers. The explosive growth of the Internet has fuelled the creation of new and exciting information services.
`
`Most of the technology developed for the Internet has been designed for desktop and larger computers and medium
`to high bandwidth, generally reliable data networks. Mass-market, hand-held wireless devices present a more
`constrained computing environment compared to desktop computers. Because of fundamental limitations of power
`and form-factor, mass-market handheld devices tend to have:
`• Less powerful CPUs,
`• Less memory (ROM and RAM),
`• Restricted power consumption,
`• Smaller displays, and
`• Different input devices (eg, a phone keypad).
`
`Similarly, wireless data networks present a more constrained communication environment compared to wired
`networks. Because of fundamental limitations of power, available spectrum, and mobility, wireless data networks
`tend to have:
`• Less bandwidth,
`• More latency,
`• Less connection stability, and
`• Less predictable availability.
`
`Mobile networks are growing in complexity and the cost of all aspects for provisioning of more value added
`services is increasing. In order to meet the requirements of mobile network operators, solutions must be:
`•
`Interoperable – terminals from different manufacturers communicate with services in the mobile network;
`• Scaleable – mobile network operators are able to scale services to customer needs;
`• Efficient – provides quality of service suited to the behaviour and characteristics of the mobile network;
`• Reliable – provides a consistent and predictable platform for deploying services; and
`• Secure – enables services to be extended over potentially unprotected mobile networks while still
`preserving the integrity of user data; protects the devices and services from security problems such as
`denial of service.
`
`Many of the current mobile networks include advanced services that can be offered to end-users. Mobile network
`operators strive to provide advanced services in a useable and attractive way in order to promote increased usage
`of the mobile network services and to decrease the turnover rate of subscribers. Standard features, like call control,
`can be enhanced by using WAP technology to provide customised user interfaces. For example, services such as
`call forwarding may provide a user interface that prompts the user to make a choice between accepting a call,
`forwarding to another person, forwarding it to voice mail, etc.
`
`The WAP specifications address mobile network characteristics and operator needs by adapting existing network
`technology to the special requirements of mass-market, hand-held wireless data devices and by introducing new
`technology where appropriate.
`
`5.2 Requirements
`
`The requirements of the WAP Forum architecture are to:
`• Leverage existing standards where possible;
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 9
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 10 (20)
`
`• Define a layered, scaleable and extensible architecture;
`• Support as many wireless networks as possible;
`• Optimise for narrow-band bearers with potentially high latency;
`• Optimise for efficient use of device resources (low memory/CPU usage/power consumption);
`• Provide support for secure applications and communication;
`• Enable the creation of Man Machine Interfaces (MMIs) with maximum flexibility and vendor control;
`• Provide access to local handset functionality, such as logical indication for incoming call;
`• Facilitate network-operator and third party service provisioning;
`• Support multi-vendor interoperability by defining the optional and mandatory components of the
`specifications; and
`• Provide a programming model for telephony services and integration.
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 10
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 11 (20)
`
`6. Architecture Overview
`
`6.1 The World-Wide Web Model
`
`The Internet World-Wide Web (WWW) architecture provides a very flexible and powerful programming model
`(Figure 1). Applications and content are presented in standard data formats, and are browsed by applications
`known as web browsers. The web browser is a networked application, ie, it sends requests for named data objects
`to a network server and the network server responds with the data encoded using the standard formats.
`
`Request (URL)
`
`Client
`
`User
`Web
`Agent
`Browser
`
`Response (Content)
`
`Web Server
`
`CGI
`Scripts,
`etc.
`
`Content
`
`Figure 1. World-Wide Web Programming Model
`
`The WWW standards specify many of the mechanisms necessary to build a general-purpose application
`environment, including:
`• Standard naming model – All servers and content on the WWW are named with an Internet-standard
`Uniform Resource Locator (URL) [RFC1738, RFC1808].
`• Content typing – All content on the WWW is given a specific type thereby allowing web browsers to
`correctly process the content based on its type [RFC2045, RFC2048].
`• Standard content formats – All web browsers support a set of standard content formats. These include the
`HyperText Markup Language (HTML) [HTML4], the JavaScript scripting language [ECMAScript,
`JavaScript], and a large number of other formats.
`• Standard Protocols – Standard networking protocols allow any web browser to communicate with any web
`server. The most commonly used protocol on the WWW is the HyperText Transport Protocol (HTTP)
`[RFC2068].
`
`This infrastructure allows users to easily reach a large number of third-party applications and content services. It
`also allows application developers to easily create applications and content services for a large community of
`clients.
`
`The WWW protocols define three classes of servers:
`• Origin server – The server on which a given resource (content) resides or is to be created.
`• Proxy – An intermediary program that acts as both a server and a client for the purpose of making requests
`on behalf of other clients. The proxy typically resides between clients and servers that have no means of
`direct communication, eg across a firewall. Requests are either serviced by the proxy program or passed
`on, with possible translation, to other servers. A proxy must implement both the client and server
`requirements of the WWW specifications.
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 11
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 12 (20)
`
`• Gateway – A server which acts as an intermediary for some other server. Unlike a proxy, a gateway
`receives requests as if it were the origin server for the requested resource.The requesting client may not be
`aware that it is communicating with a gateway.
`
`6.2 The WAP Model
`
`The WAP programming model (Figure 2) is similar to the WWW programming model. This provides several
`benefits to the application developer community, including a familiar programming model, a proven architecture,
`and the ability to leverage existing tools (eg, Web servers, XML tools, etc.). Optimisations and extensions have
`been made in order to match the characteristics of the wireless environment. Wherever possible, existing standards
`have been adopted or have been used as the starting point for the WAP technology.
`
`Client
`
`WAE
`WAE
`User
`User
`Agent
`Agent
`
`Gateway
`
`Origin Server
`
`Encoded Request
`
`Request
`
`Encoders
`Encoders
`and
`and
`Decoders
`Decoders
`
`Encoded Response
`
`Response (Content)
`
`Figure 2. WAP Programming Model
`
`CGI
`Scripts,
`etc.
`
`Content
`
`WAP content and applications are specified in a set of well-known content formats based on the familiar WWW
`content formats. Content is transported using a set of standard communication protocols based on the WWW
`communication protocols. A micro browser in the wireless terminal co-ordinates the user interface and is
`analogous to a standard web browser.
`
`WAP defines a set of standard components that enable communication between mobile terminals and network
`servers, including:
`• Standard naming model – WWW-standard URLs are used to identify WAP content on origin servers.
`WWW-standard URIs are used to identify local resources in a device, eg call control functions.
`• Content typing – All WAP content is given a specific type consistent with WWW typing. This allows
`WAP user agents to correctly process the content based on its type.
`• Standard content formats – WAP content formats are based on WWW technology and include display
`markup, calendar information, electronic business card objects, images and scripting language.
`• Standard communication protocols – WAP communication protocols enable the communication of browser
`requests from the mobile terminal to the network web server.
`
`The WAP content types and protocols have been optimised for mass market, hand-held wireless devices. WAP
`utilises proxy technology to connect between the wireless domain and the WWW. The WAP proxy typically is
`comprised of the following functionality:
`• Protocol Gateway – The protocol gateway translates requests from the WAP protocol stack (WSP, WTP,
`WTLS, and WDP) to the WWW protocol stack (HTTP and TCP/IP).
`• Content Encoders and Decoders – The content encoders translate WAP content into compact encoded
`formats to reduce the size of data over the network.
`
`This infrastructure ensures that mobile terminal users can browse a wide variety of WAP content and applications,
`and that the application author is able to build content services and applications that run on a large base of mobile
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 12
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 13 (20)
`
`terminals. The WAP proxy allows content and applications to be hosted on standard WWW servers and to be
`developed using proven WWW technologies such as CGI scripting.
`
`While the nominal use of WAP will include a web server, WAP proxy and WAP client, the WAP architecture can
`quite easily support other configurations. It is possible to create an origin server that includes the WAP proxy
`functionality. Such a server might be used to facilitate end-to-end security solutions, or applications that require
`better access control or a guarantee of responsiveness, eg, WTA.
`
`6.3 Example WAP Network
`
`The following is for illustrative purposes only. An example WAP network is shown in Figure 3.
`
`Web
`Server
`
`HTML
`
`WML
`
`WML
`
`WAP
`Proxy
`
`HTML
`Filter
`
`Wireless
`Network
`
`Binary WML
`
`WTA
`Server
`
`Figure 3. Example WAP Network
`
`In the example, the WAP client communicates with two servers in the wireless network. The WAP proxy
`translates WAP requests to WWW requests thereby allowing the WAP client to submit requests to the web server.
`The proxy also encodes the responses from the web server into the compact binary format understood by the client.
`
`If the web server provides WAP content (e.g., WML), the WAP proxy retrieves it directly from the web server.
`However, if the web server provides WWW content (such as HTML), a filter is used to translate the WWW
`content into WAP content. For example, the HTML filter would translate HTML into WML.
`
`The Wireless Telephony Application (WTA) server is an example origin or gateway server that responds to
`requests from the WAP client directly. The WTA server is used to provide WAP access to features of the wireless
`network provider’s telecommunications infrastructure.
`
`6.4 Security Model
`
`WAP enables a flexible security infrastructure that focuses on providing connection security between a WAP client
`and server.
`
`WAP can provide end-to-end security between WAP protocol endpoints. If a browser and origin server desire end-
`to-end security, they must communicate directly using the WAP protocols. End-to-end security may also be
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 13
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 14 (20)
`
`achieved if the WAP proxy is trusted or, for example, located at the same physically secure place as the origin
`server.
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 14
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 15 (20)
`
`7. Components of the WAP Architecture
`The WAP architecture provides a scaleable and extensible environment for application development for mobile
`communication devices. This is achieved through a layered design of the entire protocol stack (Figure 4). Each of
`the layers of the architecture is accessible by the layers above, as well as by other services and applications.
`
`Application Layer (WAE)
`Application Layer (WAE)
`
`Other Services and
`Applications
`
`Session Layer (WSP)
`Session Layer (WSP)
`
`Transaction Layer (WTP)
`Transaction Layer (WTP)
`
`Security Layer (WTLS)
`Security Layer (WTLS)
`
`Transport Layer (WDP)
`Transport Layer (WDP)
`
`Bearers:
`
`GSM
`
`IS-136
`
`CDMA
`
`PHS
`
`CDPD
`
`PDC-P
`
`iDEN
`
`FLEX
`
`Etc...
`
`Figure 4. WAP Architecture
`
`The WAP layered architecture enables other services and applications to utilise the features of the WAP stack
`through a set of well-defined interfaces. External applications may access the session, transaction, security and
`transport layers directly. The following sections provide a description of the various elements of the protocol stack
`architecture.
`
`7.1 Wireless Application Environment (WAE)
`
`The Wireless Application Environment (WAE) is a general-purpose application environment based on a
`combination of World Wide Web (WWW) and Mobile Telephony technologies. The primary objective of the
`WAE effort is to establish an interoperable environment that will allow operators and service providers to build
`applications and services that can reach a wide variety of different wireless platforms in an efficient and useful
`manner. WAE includes a micro-browser environment containing the following functionality:
`
`• Wireless Markup Language (WML) – a lightweight markup language, similar to HTML, but optimised for
`use in hand-held mobile terminals;
`• WMLScript – a lightweight scripting language, similar to JavaScript™;
`• Wireless Telephony Application (WTA, WTAI) – telephony services and programming interfaces; and
`• Content Formats – a set of well-defined data formats, including images, phone book records and calendar
`information.
`
`A much more detailed description of the WAE architecture is provided in [WAEoview].
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 15
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 16 (20)
`
`7.2 Wireless Session Protocol (WSP)
`
`The Wireless Session Protocol (WSP) provides the application layer of WAP with a consistent interface for two
`session services. The first is a connection-oriented service that operates above the transaction layer protocol WTP.
`The second is a connectionless service that operates above a secure or non-secure datagram service (WDP).
`
`The Wireless Session Protocols currently consist of services suited for browsing applications (WSP/B). WSP/B
`provides the following functionality:
`• HTTP/1.1 functionality and semantics in a compact over-the-air encoding,
`• Long-lived session state,
`• Session suspend and resume with session migration,
`• A common facility for reliable and unreliable data push, and
`• Protocol feature negotiation.
`
`The protocols in the WSP family are optimised for low-bandwidth bearer networks with relatively long latency.
`WSP/B is designed to allow a WAP proxy to connect a WSP/B client to a standard HTTP server. See [WSP] for
`more information.
`
`7.3 Wireless Transaction Protocol (WTP)
`
`The Wireless Transaction Protocol (WTP) runs on top of a datagram service and provides as a light-weight
`transaction-oriented protocol that is suitable for implementation in “thin” clients (mobile stations). WTP operates
`efficiently over secure or non-secure wireless datagram networks and provides the following features:
`
`• Three classes of transaction service:
`• Unreliable one-way requests,
`• Reliable one-way requests, and
`• Reliable two-way request-reply transactions;
`• Optional user-to-user reliability - WTP user triggers the confirmation of each received message;
`• Optional out-of-band data on acknowledgements;
`• PDU concatenation and delayed acknowledgement to reduce the number of messages sent; and
`• Asynchronous transactions.
`
`See [WTP] for more information.
`
`7.4 Wireless Transport Layer Security (WTLS)
`
`WTLS is a security protocol based upon the industry-standard Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol, formerly
`known as Secure Sockets Layer (SSL). WTLS is intended for use with the WAP transport protocols and has been
`optimised for use over narrow-band communication channels. WTLS provides the following features:
`• Data integrity – WTLS contains facilities to ensure that data sent between the terminal and an application
`server is unchanged and uncorrupted.
`• Privacy – WTLS contains facilities to ensures that data transmitted between the terminal and an application
`server is private and cannot be understood by any intermediate parties that may have intercepted the data
`stream.
`• Authentication – WTLS contains facilities to establish the authenticity of the terminal and application
`server.
`• Denial-of-service protection – WTLS contains facilities for detecting and rejecting data that is replayed or
`not successfully verified. WTLS makes many typical denial-of-service attacks harder to accomplish and
`protects the upper protocol layers.
`
`© Copyright Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd, 1998.
`All rights reserved.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Ex. 1039, p. 16
`
`

`
`Version 30-Apr-1998
`
`Page 17 (20)
`
`WTLS may also be used for secure communication between terminals, eg, for authentication of electronic business
`card exchange.
`
`Applications are able to selectively enable or disable WTLS features depending on their security requirements and
`the characteristics of the underlying network (eg, privacy may be disabled on networks already providing this
`service at a lower layer).
`
`See [WTLS] for more information.
`
`7.5 Wireless Datagram Protocol (WDP)
`
`The Transport layer protocol in the WAP architecture is referred to as the Wireless Datagram Protocol (WDP).
`The WDP layer operates above the data capable bearer services supported by the various network