throbber
2056
`
`Perspectives in Bladder Cancer
`Supplement to Cancer
`
`Review of a Promising New Agent-Pemetrexed
`Disodium
`
`1
`
`Luis Paz-Ares, M.D., Ph.D.
`Susana Bezares, M.D.1
`Jose M. Tabernero, M.D?
`1
`Daniel Castellanos, M.D.
`Hernan Cortes-Funes, M.D., Ph.D.
`
`1
`
`1 Department of Medical Oncology, Doce de Oc(cid:173)
`tubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
`
`2 Department of Medical Oncology, Vall D'Hebron
`University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
`
`Based on a Satellite Symposium held in conjunc(cid:173)
`tion with the First European Conference on Per(cid:173)
`spectives in Bladder Cancer, Monte Carlo, Monaco,
`November 16-17, 2001.
`
`Luis Paz-Ares and Hernan Cortes-Funes have
`given lectures with honorarium paid by Eli Lilly and
`Company.
`
`Address for reprints: Luis Paz-Ares, M.D., Ph.D.,
`Servicio de Oncologfa Medica, Hospital Universita(cid:173)
`rio Doce de Octubre, Avenida de Cordoba Km 5,4,
`28041 Madrid, Spain; Fax: 011 (34) 914603310;
`E-mail: Ipaz@hdoc.insalud.es
`
`Received May 6, 2002; revision received Septem(cid:173)
`ber 30, 2002; accepted January 13, 2003.
`
`© 2003 American Cancer Society
`
`Pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTa™, [pemetrexed], LY231514; Eli Lilly and Company;
`Indianapolis, IN), a novel antifolate antimetabolite with multiple enzyme targets
`involved in both pyrimidine and purine synthesis, has entered clinical trials due to
`its favorable pleclinical profile. Many studies utilizing the drug, as a single or
`combination agent, are currently ongoing, including Phase III trials in mesotheli(cid:173)
`oma, nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and pancreatic cancer. Promising
`feasibility and activity data have been obtained with pemetrexed in combination
`with platinum compounds and gemcitabine. The supplementation with daily oral
`folate could reduce the incidence of hematologic toxicities while preserving the
`antitumor activity of pemetrexed. Cancer 2003;97(8 Suppl):2056-63.
`© 2003 American Cancer Society.
`DOl 1O.1002/cncr.11279
`
`KEYWORDS: antifolate antimetabolite, pyrimidine synthesis, purine synthesis, thy(cid:173)
`midylate synthase.
`
`Since the discovery of the ability of aminopterin to induce remis(cid:173)
`
`sions in children with acute leukemia 6 decades ago, folate de(cid:173)
`pendent pathways have been pursued as key targets in the develop(cid:173)
`ment of new and effective anticancer agents. 1 The antifolates interfere
`with the binding of natural folate co factors to important biosynthetic
`enzymes, such as thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydrofolate reductase
`(DHFR), glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase (GARFT), and
`aminoimidazole carboxamide formyl transferase (AICARFT). Inhibi(cid:173)
`tion of these enzymes results in impeded synthesis of nucleotides
`and, thus, in DNA and RNA synthesis inhibition. Several agents of this
`class, including methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and raltitrexed, are now
`used extensively in the treatment of patients with a variety of solid
`and hematologic malignancies, and others are being developed.
`Pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTATM [pemetrexed], LY231514; Eli
`Lilly and Company; Indianapolis, IN) is a novel antifolate antimetab(cid:173)
`olite with multiple enzyme targets involved in both pyrimidine syn(cid:173)
`thesis and purine synthesis.2
`4 Due to its favorable preclinical profile,
`-
`the agent has entered clinical trials and has shown encouraging
`activity in a wide range of tumors, including nonsmall cell lung
`carcinoma (NSCLC), malignant mesothelioma, and carcinomas of the
`breast, colorectum, uterine cervix, head and neck, and bladder. Many
`studies with the drug as a single agent or in combination with other
`agents are currently ongoing, including Phase III trials in patients
`with mesothelioma, NSCLC and pancreatic carcinoma.
`
`Preclinical Studies
`Pemetrexed disodium (N -[4- [2- (2-amino-3,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7H -pyr(cid:173)
`rolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)ethyl]benzoyl]-L-glutamic acid) is a struc-
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1079-0001
`
`

`
`A Promising New Agent: Pemetrexed Disodium/Paz-Ares et al.
`
`2057
`
`H
`
`FIGURE 1. Chemical structure of pemetrexed disodium (N-[4-[2-(2-amino-
`3, 4-d ihydro-4-oxo-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d] pyri mid in -5-yl)ethyl] be nzoyl]-L -g lutamic
`acid).
`
`PEMF:':I'{{E~~J).··· - - - - -+ . C ts)
`'~ ,'T' < T -00 "
`
`___________ 5.10-CH2-THF
`
`DHF
`
`r~~R' NADPH
`lO-~~.. .
`~ ~
`
`~--,--~~,-------+THF
`
`NADP+
`
`PRPP
`L-DHF
`
`fGAR
`
`_
`
`AMP. GMP - - - . DNA. RNA
`
`FIGURE 2. The mechanism of action of pemetrexed disodium.
`
`turally novel analog of the classic antifolate GARFT
`inhibitor lometroxol (Fig. 1). It has a pyrrole ring that
`replaces the pyrazine ring in the pterine portion of
`folic acid and a methylene group that replaces the
`benzylic nitrogen in the bridge portion of folic acid.
`Inhibition of TS is the primary mechanism of action of
`pemetrexed dis odium, resulting in a decrease in the
`available thymidine necessary for DNA synthesis (Fig.
`2).5-7 In addition, pemetrexed potently inhibits DHFR,
`which catalyzes the synthesis of tetrahydrofolate and
`is the primary target for methotrexate, and GARFT. To
`inhibits
`lesser extent, pemetrexed disodium
`a
`AICARFT, an enzyme involved in the "de novo" pu(cid:173)
`rine biosynthesis like GARFT. These targets are related
`to the cytotoxicity of pemetrexed, because both thy(cid:173)
`midine and hypoxanthine are required to circumvent
`cellular death caused by pemetrexed. 6
`Pemetrexed gains entry to the cell through the
`reduced folate carrier; and, once inside the cell, the
`antifolate is polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamate
`synthase, an enzyme for which it shows high affinity.
`The pentaglutamate form of pemetrexed is the pre-
`
`dominant intracellular form and is > 60-fold more
`potent in its inhibition of TS compared with mono(cid:173)
`glutamate. 8 In addition, whereas the latter has little
`activity against GARFT and AICARFT, the pentagluta(cid:173)
`mate is much more active. The inhibitory activity of
`pemetrexed against DHFR is not increased by polyglu(cid:173)
`tarnation. Pemetrexed pentaglutarnate is most active
`against TS followed by DHFR, GARFT, and AICARFT;
`and its inhibition is competitive with respect to the
`natural folate in all instances. Glutamation increases
`cellular retention of the molecule, which translates
`into both a longer exposure time and increased intra(cid:173)
`cellular concentrations of the drug.
`Cell cycle experiments indicate that pemetrexed
`disodium induces cell cycle arrest in Gl/S phase, as
`expected by its antifolate effects, and cell death, which
`did not appear to be mediated by P53. Cell culture
`studies demonstrated that pemetrexed is cytotoxic
`against a number of cell lines, including CCRF-CEM
`leukemia cells, GC3/Cl colon carcinoma cells, and
`HCT-8 ileocecal carcinoma cells? In addition, in vitro
`activity has been demonstrated against human-tumor
`colony-forming units obtained from patients with co(cid:173)
`lon carcinoma, renal carcinoma, hepatoma, carcinoid
`tumor, and lung carcinoma. 9 Pemetrexed disodium
`also was established as an effective antitumor agent
`against murine tumors and against several human
`tumor xenografts, including VRC5 colon carcinoma
`cells, GC3 colon carcinoma cells, BXPC3 pancreatic
`carcinoma cells, LX-I NSCLC cells, and MX-l breast
`carcinoma cells. 10 Furthermore, the drug has signifi(cid:173)
`cant activity in cell lines and xenografts that are resis(cid:173)
`tant to methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and raltitrexed. 3
`These findings are consistent with the multitargeted
`mechanism of action of pemetrexed and suggest that
`the agent may be useful in 5-fluorouracil-resistant,
`raltitrexed-resistant, and methotrexate-resistant tu(cid:173)
`mors.
`Several dose administration schedules for pem(cid:173)
`etrexed were tested in toxicology studies in dogs. Uni(cid:173)
`formly, the predominant toxicities were gastrointesti(cid:173)
`nal and hematologic. Marked schedule dependence
`was noted, with the best toxicity profile found using
`once-weekly dosing compared with daily dosing.ll
`
`Single-Agent Phase I Studies
`Given the schedule dependency observed in animal
`models, Phase I studies were conducted exploring
`three treatment schedules: daily X 5 every 3 weeks,
`weekly X 4 on a 6-week cycle, and once every 3 weeks
`(Table 1).9.12.13 The predominant toxicity on each
`schedule was hematologic, particularly neutropenia,
`which was dose limiting. Other side effects encoun(cid:173)
`tered included fatigue, diarrhea, mucositis, cutaneous
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1079-0002
`
`

`
`2058
`
`CANCER Supplement April 15, 2003/ Volume 97/ Number 8
`
`TABLE 1
`Single-Agent Phase I Trials
`
`Authors
`
`McDonald et al.12
`
`Rinaldi et aU 3
`
`Rinaldi et al.'
`
`No. of
`patients
`
`38
`
`24
`
`37
`
`DLT: dose limiting toxicity.
`
`Schedule
`
`Dose (mg/m2)
`
`Recommended
`dose
`
`DLT
`
`Daily X 5, 3-week
`cycle, 10-minute
`infusion
`Weekly X 4, 6-
`week cycle 10-
`minute infusion
`Once every 3
`weeks, 10-
`minute infusion
`
`0.2-5.2/ day
`
`4 mg/m2 day
`
`Neutropenia, liver
`enzymes elevation
`
`10-40/week
`
`40 mg/m2/week
`
`Neutropenia
`
`50-700
`
`600 mg/m2
`
`Neutropenia,
`thrombocytopenia,
`cumulative fatigue
`
`Other toxicities
`
`Mucositis,
`diarrhea, rash,
`fatigue
`Anorexia, nausea,
`fatigue
`
`Rash, mucositis,
`nausea,
`emesis,
`vomiting,
`fatigue,
`anorexia
`
`rash, and transient transaminitis. Given the conve(cid:173)
`nience for the patient, the higher dose intensity at the
`recommended dose, and the antitumor activity seen
`during the Phase I trial, with partial responses in two
`patients with pancreatic cancer and in two patients
`with advanced colorectal cancer, the 3-weekly sched(cid:173)
`ule was chosen for further development in Phase II
`trials.
`Pharmacokinetic determinations were made in 20
`patients who were treated at the recommended dose
`(600 mg/m2) in the trial performed by Rinaldi et al.9,13
`Pemetrexed plasma concentration-time functions fol(cid:173)
`lowed a two-compartment model. The mean peak
`plasma concentration at the recommended dose of
`600 mg/m2 was 137 fLg/mL, and the mean half-life was
`3.1 hours (range, 2.2-7.2 hours). The apparent steady(cid:173)
`state volume of distribution was 6.8 Llm2, which sug(cid:173)
`gests that pemetrexed is confined primarily to the
`plasma and interstitial compartments. This is consis(cid:173)
`tent with the polar nature of the compound and the
`relatively high clearance (40 mL per minute per m 2).
`The clearance of pemetrexed is primarily renal, with
`78% of the dose recovered unchanged in the urine in
`the first 24 hours after administration.14 No accumu(cid:173)
`lation appears to occur with multiple courses, and the
`linear disposition of pemetrexed over the range stud(cid:173)
`ied does not change after multiple doses. Protein
`binding in human plasma is approximately 81 %.
`
`Single-Agent Phase II Studies
`In Phase II trials, pemetrexed (500-600 mg/m2 every 3
`weeks) has demonstrated single-agent activity in mul(cid:173)
`tiple solid tumors, including NSCLC and tumors of
`the breast, colorectum, pancreas, uterine cervix, blad(cid:173)
`der' and head and neck (Table 2). Two trials in pa-
`
`tients with advanced NSCLC, including 78 untreated
`patients, resulted in a remarkable overall response
`rate (RR) of 20% and a median survival of 9.2-9.8
`months.15,16 A third trial was completed in pretreated
`patients with NSCLC who had an overall RR of 30% in
`patients who had not been previously exposed to plat(cid:173)
`inurn compounds and of 13% in patients who had
`received platinum as first-line treatment.17 With these
`data in mind, a Phase III trial has been started com(cid:173)
`paring pemetrexed disodium with docetaxel as sec(cid:173)
`ond -line treatment in patients with NSCLC. Pem(cid:173)
`etrexed exhibited activity in patients with colorectal
`cancer similar to the activity of other agents, produc(cid:173)
`ing RRs of 15% and 17% in two independent Phase II
`trials in untreated patients.18,19 Pemetrexed disodium
`has been evaluated in patients with advanced breast
`carcinoma in three trials as second-or third -line treat(cid:173)
`ment.20-22 The antifolate showed promising activity,
`with an overall RR that exceeded 25%, and the drug
`was effective in subsets of patients with prior failure to
`anthracyclines (RR, 29%), failure to taxanes (RR, 28%),
`and failure to anthracyclines and taxanes (RR, 19%).
`Pemetrexed has also shown promising activity in pa(cid:173)
`tients with bladder cancer (RR, 32%; see below) and in
`patients with squamous cell carcinomas arising in the
`uterine cervix (RR, 21 %) and the head and neck (RR,
`33%).23-25 The single-agent activity of pemetrexed di(cid:173)
`sodium in patients with advanced pancreatic carci(cid:173)
`noma was marginal (RR, 6%).26
`A pooled toxicity analysis of 872 patients entered
`on Phase II trials is presented in Table 3.2- 4,27 Myelo(cid:173)
`suppression, as may be predicted by the antifolate
`nature of pemetrexed, was the predominant side ef(cid:173)
`fect. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 50% of
`patients, and febrile neutropenia and neutropenic
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1079-0003
`
`

`
`TABLE 2
`Single-Agent Phase II Trials with Pemetrexed
`
`A Promising New Agent: Pemetrexed Disodium/Paz-Ares et al.
`
`2059
`
`Authors
`
`Rusthoven et aP 5
`NSCLC
`First line
`Clarke et aP6
`NSCLC
`First line
`Postmus et aP'
`NSCLC
`Second line
`Cripps et aP 8
`Colorectal
`John et aI.19
`Colorectal
`Miller et aI.26
`Pancreas
`
`Lind et aI.2O
`Breast
`Second line
`Theodoulou et aI.21
`Breast
`Third line
`Spielmann et aI.22
`Breast
`Second or third line
`Goedhals and van Wijk24
`Cervix
`Pivot et aI.25
`Head and neck
`Paz-Ares et aI.23
`Bladder
`
`No. of
`patients
`
`33
`
`40
`
`43
`
`29
`
`40
`
`42
`
`36
`
`24
`
`69
`
`24
`
`35
`
`31
`
`Dose mg/m2
`
`600 (3 patients)
`500 (30 patients)
`
`500
`
`500
`
`600 (9 patients), 500 (23 patients)
`
`600
`
`600
`
`600
`
`500
`
`600
`
`600
`
`500
`
`600 (6 patients), 500 (25 patients)
`
`Response rate
`(%)
`
`Overall survival
`(months)
`
`23
`
`18
`
`P13
`NP30
`
`17
`
`15
`
`40
`
`31
`
`19
`
`26
`
`21 (71% SD)
`
`26.5
`
`32
`
`9.2
`
`9.8
`
`4.3
`
`12
`
`12.8
`
`6.4
`
`9.5
`
`NSCLC: nonsmall cell lung carcinoma; P: previously treated with platinum-based regimens; NP: previously treated with nonplatinum-based regimens; SD: stable disease.
`
`sepsis were relatively uncommon. The incidence of
`Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and anemia was 15%
`and 17%, respectively. The most common nonhema(cid:173)
`tologic toxicity was hepatic enzyme elevations (Grade
`1-2 in 60-70% of patients, Grade 3 in 12% of patients).
`Elevations of transaminase levels were more frequent
`than alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin abnormalities
`and typically returned to baseline levels before the
`start of the subsequent course. A diffuse maculopap(cid:173)
`ular rash with a predominantly truncal distribution
`was frequent but was preventable with steroid pre(cid:173)
`medication in subsequent cycles. Other toxicities,
`usually mild to moderate, included emesis, fatigue,
`mucositis, and diarrhea.
`From December 1999, a requirement for daily oral
`folic acid 350-600 fLg per day and vitamin Bl2 was
`added to all pemetrexed studies. The rationale for this
`requirement was based on some compelling data sug(cid:173)
`gesting an improvement in the therapeutic index of
`
`this drug when given with vitamin supplementation.
`Some investigators have established a correlation be(cid:173)
`tween the folic acid status of patients and the inci(cid:173)
`dence of toxicity with other antifolates. 28
`29 These
`•
`studies concluded that the addition of folate to these
`treatments markedly decreased the incidence of tox(cid:173)
`icity while maintaining efficacy. More recently, Wor(cid:173)
`zalla et al. reported that, in mice that were given folic
`acid with pemetrexed, the incidence and severity of
`adverse events were lowered dramatically, whereas
`the antitumor activity was preserved.3D Concurrent
`with that study, Niyikiza et al. assessed the correlation
`between vitamin metabolites (homocysteine, cystathi-
`0nine' and methylmalonic acid), systemic pemetrexed
`exposure, and patient toxicities.31 Those authors ob(cid:173)
`served that high homocysteine pretreatment levels,
`which reflect poor folate status, were related closely to
`an increased risk of Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombo(cid:173)
`cytopenia, Grade 3-4 mucositis, or diarrhea. A subse-
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1079-0004
`
`

`
`2060
`
`CANCER Supplement April 15, 2003/ Volume 97/ Number 8
`
`TABLE 3
`Hematologic and Nonhematologic Toxicity in 872 Patients Treated in
`the Phase II Program of Pemetrexed (500-600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks)a
`
`NCI-CTC toxicity grade (worst per patient, %)
`
`Toxicity
`
`ANC
`Hemoglobin
`Platelets
`Nausea
`Emesis
`Stomatitis
`Diarrhea
`Alk phos
`ALI
`ASI
`Bilirubin
`Creatinine
`Cutaneous
`Fatigue
`Infection
`Pulmonary
`
`2
`
`17
`37
`8
`22
`20
`12
`
`21
`20
`
`27
`19
`
`10
`31
`22
`28
`15
`20
`15
`32
`39
`47
`< 1
`11
`19
`16
`
`3
`
`23
`14
`8
`
`12
`
`< 1
`5
`6
`
`4
`
`27
`3
`
`< 1
`2
`< 1
`2
`
`< 1
`< 1
`2
`
`< 1
`2
`
`NCI-CTC: National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity ANC: absolute neutrophil count; Alk phos:
`alkaline phosphatase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase.
`
`quent study explored combining pemetrexed and
`high-dose, intermittent, oral folic acid (5 mg daily on
`Days - 2 to Day + 2 of every cycle) in a Phase I triaL32
`Preliminary data have indicated that folic acid ame(cid:173)
`liorates toxicities, permitting dose escalations ofpem(cid:173)
`etrexed up to ::,. 925 mg/m2 in heavily pretreated pa(cid:173)
`tients_ A recent report of an ongoing Phase II trial of
`pemetrexed with or without folic acid in patients with
`gastric cancer also indicates that the addition of the
`vitamin substantially improves the safety profile of
`pemetrexed_33 Furthermore, a preliminary compara(cid:173)
`tive toxicity analysis of patients treated in different
`trials with (78 patients) or without (246 patients) vita(cid:173)
`min supplementation showed that the addition of fo(cid:173)
`lic acid and vitamin Bl2 substantially reduced the in(cid:173)
`cidence of adverse events, such as Grade 4
`neutropenia (2_6% vs_ 32%), Grade 4 thrombocytope(cid:173)
`nia (0% vs_ 8%), Grade 3-4 mucositis (1.3% vs_ 5%),
`Grade 3-4 diarrhea (2_6% vs_ 6%), and toxic death (0%
`vs_ 5%)_2
`
`Combination Studies
`Once an anticancer drug has shown clinical activity as
`single agent and has been associated with a manage(cid:173)
`able toxicity profile, like pemetrexed disodium, the
`next logical step in its development is to perform
`combination studies with other active compounds,
`particularly those with different mechanisms of action
`and nonoverlapping toxicity_ Xenograft studies ini-
`
`tially performed showed that the most effective com(cid:173)
`binations of pemetrexed were with platinum com(cid:173)
`pounds and 5-fluorouraciL Synergistic or additive
`antitumor effects were also achieved with gemcitab(cid:173)
`ine, methotrexate, and paclitaxeL3-1o Additive re(cid:173)
`sponses were seen with doxorubicin, vinorelbine, cy(cid:173)
`clophosphamide, and fractional radiation_
`Clinical trials of pemetrexed in combination with
`cisplatin and other analogs, including gemcitabine,
`irinotecan, taxanes, anthracyclines, and 5-fluoroura(cid:173)
`cil, have been initiated_ Initials results are available for
`some regimens, although many studies are still ongo(cid:173)
`ing_ Thodtmann et aL performed a Phase I trial with
`the combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin in which
`neutropenia and delayed fatigue were the observed
`toxicities_34 Those authors
`dose-limiting
`recom(cid:173)
`mended the following dose and schedule for future
`trials: pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 followed, after a 30-
`minute wash-out period, by cisplatin 75 mg/m2_
`Eleven of 40 assessable patients in that trial showed an
`objective remission, including one complete response_
`It is interesting to note that 5 of 11 patients with
`malignant mesothelioma obtained a partial response_
`Based on these data, a large Phase III trial comparing
`cisplatin with pemetrexed plus cisplatin has been per(cid:173)
`formed in patients with malignant mesothelioma_ The
`results of that trial were presented recently at the 2002
`annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical
`Oncology and showed that the combination regimen
`improved survival significantly compared with cispla(cid:173)
`tin alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0_77; P < 0_020)_ In addi(cid:173)
`tion, combined pemetrexed and cisplatin also showed
`significant improvements in the response rate (41 % vs_
`17%; P < 0_001), the time to disease progression (HR,
`0_64; P < 0_008), lung function, and subjective indica(cid:173)
`tors of quality of life_
`The pemetrexed/ cisplatin regimen has been
`tested as front-line treatment in patients with ad(cid:173)
`vanced NSCLC in two Phase II studies_ Manegold et aL
`reported an overall response rate of 39% and a median
`survival of 10_9 months in 36 patients who were in(cid:173)
`cluded in their study_ The main toxic effects were
`Grade 3-4 neutropenia (59%), Grade 3-4 thrombocy(cid:173)
`topenia (17%) and Grade 3-4 diarrhea (6%)_35 Com(cid:173)
`parable results were obtained in another study that
`was conducted in Canada_ 36
`The combination of pemetrexed 400-600 mg/m2
`and carboplatin (area under the serum concentration(cid:173)
`time curve, 4-6 mg/mL per minute) has been studied
`in a Phase I trial in patients with malignant mesothe(cid:173)
`lioma_37 The toxicities were manageable, including
`predominantly short-lived myelosuppression, and re(cid:173)
`sponses were observed in 10 of 20 patients who were
`evaluated_ According to that study, the recommended
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1079-0005
`
`

`
`A Promising New Agent: Pemetrexed Disodium/Paz-Ares et al.
`
`2061
`
`dose for Phase II trials is pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and
`carboplatin 5 mg/mL per minute. In another ongoing
`trial, the doublet pemetrexed plus oxalipaltin has been
`investigated.38 The regimen seems to be well tolerated,
`with hematologic dose-limiting toxicities, and 2 partial
`responses have been observed in 28 patients who are
`participating. The recommended schedule for further
`testing consists ofpemetrexed 500 mg/m2 followed by
`oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2.
`A Phase I study of sequences of gemcitabine and
`pemetrexed was completed recently.39 The recom(cid:173)
`mended dose and schedule for this combination was
`gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 and pem(cid:173)
`etrexed 500 mg/m2 on Day 8 (administered 90 min(cid:173)
`utes after gemcitabine) every 3 weeks. The most com(cid:173)
`mon toxicity was neutropenia, and other toxicities
`included emesis, fatigue, and transaminitis. The re(cid:173)
`sults were encouraging, with responses observed in 13
`of 35 patients who had a variety of solid tumors. An
`ongoing Phase III trial is comparing single-agent gem(cid:173)
`citabine with the gemcitabine plus pemetrexed com(cid:173)
`bination in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
`
`Pemetrexed Disodium in Patients with Bladder Cancer
`The safety and efficacy of pemetrexed in patients
`with advanced bladder cancer was explored in a
`recently concluded Phase II study in a chemother(cid:173)
`apy naIve population.23 Thirty-three patients (31
`men and 2 women; median age, 65 years) with met(cid:173)
`astatic or recurrent, inoperable bladder carcinoma
`who had measurable disease and a World Health
`Organization performance status <s 2 were included.
`Two patients were ineligible, because one patient
`had received prior chemotherapy, and the other
`patient had low creatinine clearance. Treatment
`consisted of pemetrexed 600 mg/m2 (the first 6 pa(cid:173)
`tients) or 500 mg/m2 (the remaining patients) ad(cid:173)
`ministered as a 10-minute infusion every 21 days.
`No vitamin supplementation was given.
`A total of 114 cycles of pemetrexed were admin(cid:173)
`istered to 31 patients. Patients underwent a median of
`3 cycles (range, 1-12 cycles) of therapy. The 25 pa(cid:173)
`tients who were administered pemetrexed 500 mg/m2
`received a median of 4 cycles (range, 1-9 cycles), with
`a median dose intensity of 483 mg/m2. The 6 patients
`who were administered pemetrexed 600 mg/m2 re(cid:173)
`ceived a median of 2 cycles (range, 1-12 cycles), with
`a median dose intensity of 577 mg/m2. Toxicity in this
`trial was significant and was predominantly hemato(cid:173)
`logic, including Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (6%),
`anemia (23%), neutropenia (71 %), and febrile neutro(cid:173)
`penia (26%). Nonhematologic toxicity consisted of
`mild-to-moderate mucositis, diarrhea, and lethargy.
`Three early deaths were observed due to sepsis and
`
`renal failure or mucositis (two patients) and atrial
`fibrillation and cardiac failure (one patient). We spec(cid:173)
`ulate that two factors may have contributed to the
`higher incidence of toxicity observed in our trial com(cid:173)
`pared with other Phase II studies in solid tumors. First,
`patients with bladder cancer often have some degree
`of renal impairment associated with their disease
`state. This may have conditioned a decreased pem(cid:173)
`etrexed clearance and, subsequently, an increase in
`the incidence of certain toxicities, such as neutrope(cid:173)
`nia.9,13 Second, the nutritional status and, in particu(cid:173)
`lar, the folate status of the patients in this study may
`have been poorer compared with other cohorts, Many
`patients with bladder cancer in Spain have a history of
`heavy alcohol consumption, Furthermore, the typical
`diet in Spain does not include the vitamin-enriched
`breakfast cereals consumed in the United States,
`Twenty-eight patients who received at least two
`cycles were evaluable for efficacy according to the
`protocoL Nine patients (32%; 95% confidence interval
`[95%CI], 16-52%) achieved a partial response, Ten
`patients (36%) had disease stabilization, and 6 pa(cid:173)
`tients (21 %) had a best study response of progressive
`disease, Tumor response was not evaluated in three
`patients (11 %), The response rate on an intent -to-treat
`basis was 29% (95%CI, 14-48%), Responses were seen
`at all disease sites, including the liver, and were more
`frequent in patients with better performance status (0
`vs, 1-2; P = 0,013) and with nonvisceral metastasis (P
`= 0,01) but were not related to the starting dose (500
`mg/m2 vs, 600 mg/m2; P = LO), The antitumor activity
`observed in this trial was encouraging and identified
`pemetrexed as the only new drug with activity against
`urothelial bladder cancer since studies demonstrated
`the activity of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and docetaxeL 40
`The median response duration (8,0 months; 95%CI,
`7.4-10.5 months) and overall survival (9.4 months;
`95%CI, 5,7-12,8 months) compare favorably with most
`single agents in this setting and are similar to those
`noted with novel combination regimens, such as car(cid:173)
`boplatin plus paclitaxeL 41 These results are particu(cid:173)
`larly appealing considering the fact that all patients in
`our series had metastatic or recurrent disease, and
`61 % of patients had visceral metastases,
`Based on this study, a new single-agent pem(cid:173)
`etrexed trial (500 mg/m2 with vitamin supplementa(cid:173)
`tion) has been initiated in pretreated patients, In ad(cid:173)
`dition, and taking into account the combination
`regimen data in other patient populations, doublets
`and triplets of pemetrexed with platinum compounds,
`gemcitabine, and other active agents (such as taxanes)
`merit further investigation,
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1079-0006
`
`

`
`2062
`
`CANCER Supplement April 15, 20031 Volume 971 Number 8
`
`Conclusions
`Pemetrexed disodium is a new and multitargeted an(cid:173)
`tifolate that exhibits significant antitumor activity in a
`wide range of solid tumors, including NSCLC, me(cid:173)
`sothelioma, and carcinomas of the breast, colon, uter(cid:173)
`ine cervix, head and neck, and bladder. Promising
`feasibility and activity data have been obtained with
`pemetrexed in combination with platinum com(cid:173)
`pounds and gemcitabine. The supplementation with
`daily oral folate may reduce the incidence of hemato(cid:173)
`logic toxicities while preserving the antitumor activity
`of pemetrexed disodium. The role of this agent in the
`management of patients with solid tumors will be
`determined by randomized Phase III studies, like the
`recent study performed in patients with malignant
`mesothelioma that has been closed to accrual.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Farber S, Diamond LK, Mercer RD, et al. Temporary remis(cid:173)
`sions in acute leukemia in children produced by folic acid
`antagonist, 4-aminopteroyl-glutamic acid (aminopterin).
`N Engl ] Med. 1948;238:787-793.
`2. Hanauske A-R, Chen V, Paoletti P, Niyikiza C. Pemetrexed
`disodium: a novel antifolate clinically active against multi(cid:173)
`ple solid tumors. Oncalagist.2001;6:363-373.
`3. Shih C, Thornton DE. Preclinical pharmacology studies and
`the clinical development of a novel multitargeted antifolate,
`MTA (LY231S14). In: Jackman AL, editor. Antifolate drugs in
`cancer therapy. Totawa: Humana Press 1999:183-201.
`4. Curtin NJ, Hughes AN. Pemetrexed disodium, a novel anti(cid:173)
`folate with multiple targets. Lancet Oneal. 2001;2:298-306.
`S. Shih C, Chen VI, Gossett LS, et al. LY231S14, a pyrrolo (2,3-d)
`pyrimidine-based antifolate that inhibits multiple folate(cid:173)
`requering enzymes. Cancer Res. 1997;S7:1116-1123.
`6. Shih C, Habeck LL, Mendelshon LG, et al. Multiple folate
`enzyme inhibition: molecular mechanisms of a novel pyr(cid:173)
`rolopyrimidine-based antifolate LY231S14 (MTA). Adv En(cid:173)
`zyme Regul. 1998;38: 13S-1S2.
`7. Schutlz RM, Patel VF, Worzalla JF, et al. Role of thymidylate
`synthase in the antitumor activity of the multitargeted an(cid:173)
`tifolate, LY231S14. Anticancer Res. 1999;19:437-443.
`8. Mendelshon LG, Shih C, Chen VJ, et al. Enzyme inhibition,
`polyglutamation and the effects of LY231S14 (MTA) on pu(cid:173)
`rine biosynthesis. Semin Oneal. 1999;26:42-47.
`9. Rinaldi DA, Kuhn JG, Burris HA, et al. A Phase I evaluation of
`multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231S14), administered ev(cid:173)
`ery 21 days, utilizing the modified continual reassessment
`method for dose escalation. Cancer Chemather Pharmacal.
`1999;44:372-380.
`10. Teicher BA, Chen V, Shih C, et al. Treatment regimens
`including the multitargeted antifolate LY231S14 in human
`tumor xenografts. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:1016-1023.
`11. Woodland JM, Barnett CJ, Dorman DE, et al. Metabolism
`and disposition of the antifolate LY231S14 in mice and dogs.
`Drug Metabal Disp. 1997;2S:693-700.
`12. McDonald AC, Vasey PA, Adams L, et al. A Phase I and
`pharmacokinetic study of LY231S14, the multitargeted anti(cid:173)
`folate. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:60S-61O.
`
`13. Rinaldi DA, Burris HA, Dorr FA, et al. Initial Phase I evalu(cid:173)
`ation of the novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor, LY231S14,
`using the modified continual reassessment method for dose
`escalation. ] Clin Oneal. 1995;13:2842-28S0.
`14. Ouellet D, Periclou AP, Johnson RD, et al. Population phar(cid:173)
`macokinetics ofpemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA) in patients
`with cancer. Cancer Chemather Pharmacal. 2000;46:227-
`234.
`IS. Rusthoven J, Eisenhauer E, Butts C, et al. Multitargeted
`antifolate, LY231S14, as first-line chemotherapy for patients
`with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Phase II study.
`] Clin Oneal. 1999;17:1194-1199.
`16. Clarke S, Millward M, Findlay M, et al. Activity of the multi(cid:173)
`targeted antifolate MTA (LY231S14) in advanced non-small
`cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oneal. 1998;9:86.
`17. Postmus P, Mattson K, von Pawel J, et al. Phase II trial of
`MTA (LY231S14) in patients (Pts) with non-small cell lung
`cancer (NSCLC) who relapsed after previous platinum or
`non-platinum chemotherapy. EurJ Cancer. 1999;3S(Suppl
`4):249.
`18. Cripps C, Burnell M, Jolivet J, et al. Phase II study of first-line
`LY231S14 (multitargeted antifolate) in patients with locally
`advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: an NCIC Clinical
`Trials Group study. Ann Oneal. 1999;10:117S-1179.
`19. John W, Picus J, Blanke C et al. Multitargeted antifolate
`(pemetrexed disodium, LY231S14) activity in patients with
`advanced colorectal cancer: results from a Phase II study.
`Cancer. 2000;88:1807-1813.
`20. Lind MJ, Smith IE, Coleman RE, et al. Phase II study ofMTA
`(LY231S14) in patients (pts) with locally recurrent or meta(cid:173)
`static breast cancer (LR/MBC). Proc Am Sac Clin Oneal.
`1998;17:433a.
`21. Theodoulou M, Llombart A, Cruciani G, et al. Pemetrexed
`disodium (ALIMTATM; LY231S14, MTA) in locally advanced
`or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (Pts) with prior
`anthracycl

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket