throbber
NEUPOGEN~ (Filgrastim)
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`Filgrastim is a human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), produced by
`recombinant DNA technology. NEUPOGEN~ is the Amgen Inc. trademark for
`Filgrastim, which has been selected as the name for recombinant methionyl human
`granulocyte colony stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF).
`
`NEUPOGEN is a 175 amino acid protein manufactured by recombinant DNA
`technology.1 NEUPOGEN is produced by Escherichia coli (E coli) bacteria int~ which
`has been inserted the human granulocyte colony stimulating factor gene. NEUPOGEN
`has a molecular weight of 18,800 daltons. The protein has an amino acid sequence that is
`identical to the natural sequence predicted from human DNA sequence analysis, except for
`the addition of an N-terminal methionine necessary for expression in E coli. Because
`NEUPOGEN is produced in E coli, the product is nonglycosylated and thus differs from
`G-CSF isolated from a human cell.
`
`NEUPOGEN is a sterile, clear, colorless, preservative-free liquid for parenteral
`administration. Each single-use vial of NEUPOGEN contains 300 mcg/mL of Filgrastim
`at a specific activity of 1.0 -v 0.6 x 108 U/mg, (as measured by a cell mitogenesis assay).
`The product is formulated in a 10 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.0, containing 5%
`sorbitol, and 0.004% Tween® 80. The quantitative composition (per mL) of
`NEUPOGEN is:
`
`Filgrastim
`
`Acetate
`
`Sorbitol
`
`Tween® 80
`
`Sodium
`
`Water for Injection
`USP q.s. ad
`
`300 mcg
`
`0.59 mg
`
`50.0 mg
`
`0.004%
`
`0.035 mg
`
`1.0 mL
`
`1072
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0001
`
`

`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`Colony Stimulating Factors
`
`Colony stimulating factors are glycoproteins which act on hematopoietic cells by binding
`to specific cell surface receptors and stimulating proliferation, differentiation commitment,
`and some end-cell functional activation.
`
`Endogenous G-CSF is a lineage specific colony stimulating factor which is produced by
`monocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. G-CSF regulates the production of
`neutrophils within the bone marrow and affects neutrophil progenitor proliferation,2’3
`differentiation,2’4 and selected end-cell functional activation (including enhanced
`phagocytic ability,5 priming of the cellular metabolism associated with respiratory burst,6
`antibody dependent killing/and the increased expression of some functions associated
`with cell surface antigens8). G-CSF is not species specific and has been shown to have
`minimal direct in vivo or in vitro effects on the production ofhematopoietic cell types
`other than the neutrophil lineage.
`
`Preclinical Experience
`
`Filgrastim was administered to monkeys, dogs, hamsters, rats, and mice ’as part of a
`preclinical toxicology program which included single-dose acute, repeated-dose subacute,
`subchronic, and chronic studies. Single-dose administration of Filgrastim by the oral,
`intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SC), or intraperitoneal (IP) routes resulted in no
`significant toxicity in mice, rats, hamsters, or monkeys. Although no deaths were
`observed in mice, rats, or monkeys at dose levels up to 3450 mcg/kg or in hamsters using
`single doses up to approximately 860 mcg/kg, deaths were observed in a subchronic (13-
`week) study in monkeys. In this study, evidence of neurological symptoms was seen in
`monkeys treated with doses of Filgrastim greater than 1150 mcg/kg/day for up to 18 days.
`Deaths were seen in five of the eight treated animals and were associated with 15- to 28-
`fold increases in peripheral leukocyte counts, and neutrophil-infiltrated hemorrhagic foci
`were seen in both the cerebrum and cerebellum. In contrast, no monkeys died following
`13 weeks of daily IV administration of Filgrastim at a dose level of 115 mcg/kg. In an
`ensuing 52-week study, one 115 mcg/kg dose female monkey died atter 18 weeks of daily
`IV administration of Filgrastim. Death was attributed to cardiopulmonary insufficiency.
`
`In subacute, repeated-dose studies, changes observed were attributable to the expected
`pharmacological actions of Filgrastim (ie, dose-dependent increases in white cell counts,
`increased circulating segmented neutrophils, and increased myeloid:erythroid ratio in bone
`marrow). In all species, histopathologic examination of the liver and spleen revealed
`evidence of ongoing extramedullary granulopoiesis; increased spleen weights were seen in
`all species and appeared to be dose-related. A dose-dependent increase in serum alkaline
`
`2
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0002
`
`

`
`phosphatase was observed in rats, and may reflect increased activity of osteoblasts and
`osteoclasts. Changes in serum chemistry values were reversible following discontinuation
`of treatment.
`
`In rats treated at doses of 1150 mcg/kg/day for 4 weeks (5 of 32 animals) and for 13
`weeks at doses of 100 mcg/kg/day (4 of 32 animals) and 500 mcg/kg/day (6 of 32
`animals), articular swelling of the hind legs was observed. Some degree of hind leg
`dysfunction was also observed; however, symptoms reversed following cessation of
`dosing. In rats, osteoclasis and osteoanagenesis were found in the femur, humerus,
`coccyx, and hind legs (where they were accompanied by synovitis) after IV treatment for
`4 weeks (115 to 1150 mcg/kg/day), and in the sternum after IV treatment for 13 weeks
`(115 to 575 mcg/kg/day). These effects reversed to normal within 4 to 5 weeks following
`cessation of treatment.
`
`In the 52-week chronic, repeated-dose studies performed in rats (IP injection up to 57.5
`mcg/kg/day), and cynomolgus monkeys (IV injection of up to 115 mcg/kg/day), changes
`observed were similar to those noted in the subacute studies. Expected pharmacological
`actions of Filgrastim included dose-dependent increases in white cell counts, increased
`circulating segmented neutrophils and alkaline phosphatase levels, and increased
`myeloid:erythroid ratios in the bone marrow. Decreases in platelet counts were also noted
`in primates. In no animals tested were hemorrhagic complications observed. Rats
`displayed dose-related swelling of the hind limb, accompanied by some degree of hind
`limb dysfunction; osteopathy was noted microscopically. Enlarged spleens (both species)
`and livers (monkeys), reflective of ongoing extramedullary granulopoiesis, as well as
`myeloid hyperplasia of the bone marrow, were observed in a dose-dependent manner.
`
`Pharmacologic Effects of NEUPOGEN
`
`In phase 1 studies involving 96 patients with various nonmyeloid malignancies,
`NEUPOGEN administration resulted in a dose-dependent increase in circulating
`neutrophil counts over the dose range of 1 to 70 mcg/kg/day.911 This increase in
`neutrophil counts was observed whether NEUPOGEN was administered IV (1 to 70
`mcg/kg twice daily),9 SC (1 to 3 mcgikg once daily),1~ or by continuous SC infusion (3 to
`11 mcgikg/day).1° With discontinuation of NEUPOGEN therapy, neutrophil counts
`returned to baseline, in most cases within 4 days. Isolated neutrophils displayed normal
`phagocytic (measured by zymosan-stimulated chemoluminescence) and chemotactic
`[measured by migration under agarose using N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine
`(fMLP) as the chemotaxin] activity in vitro.
`
`The absolute monocyte count was reported to increase in a dose-dependent manner in
`most patients receiving NEUPOGEN, however, the percentage ofmonocytes in the
`differential count remained within the normal range. In all studies to date, absolute counts
`of both eosinophils and basophils did not change and were within the normal range
`following administration of NEUPOGEN. Increases in lymphocyte counts following
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0003
`
`

`
`NEUPOGEN administration have been reported in some normal subjects and cancer
`patients.
`
`White blood cell (WBC) differentials obtained during clinical trials have demonstrated a
`shift towards earlier granulocyte progenitor cells (left shift), including the appearance of
`promyelocytes and myeloblasts, usually during neutrophil recovery following the
`chemotherapy-induced nadir. In addition, Dohle bodies, increased granulocyte
`granulation, as well as hypersegmented neutrophils have been observed. Such changes
`were transient, and were not associated with clinical sequelae nor were they necessarily
`associated with infection.
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`Absorption and clearance of NEUPOGEN follows first-order pharmacokinetic modeling
`without apparent concentration dependence. A positive linear correlation occurred
`between the parenteral dose and both the serum concentration and area under the
`concentration-time curves. Continuous IV infusion of 20 mcg/kg of NEUPOGEN over 24
`hours resulted in mean and median serum concentrations of approximately 48 and 56
`ng/mL, respectively. Subcutaneous administration of 3.45 mcg/kg and 11.5 mcg/kg
`resulted in maximum serum concentrations of 4 and 49 ng/mL, respectively, within 2 to 8
`hours. The volume of distribution averaged 150 mL/kg in both normal subjects and
`cancer patients. The elimination half-life, in both normal subjects and cancer patients, was
`approximately 3.5 hours. Clearance rates of NEUPOGEN were approximately 0.5 to 0.7
`mL/minute/kg. Single parenteral doses or daily IV doses, over a 14-day period, resulted
`in comparable half-lives. The half-lives were similar for IV administration (231 minutes,
`following doses of 34.5 mcgikg) and for SC administration (210 minutes, following
`NEUPOGEN doses of 3.45 mcg/kg). Continuous 24-hour IV infusions of 20 mcg/kg
`over an 11- to 20-day period produced steady-state serum concentrations of NEUPOGEN
`with no evidence of drug accumulation over the time period investigated.
`
`CLINICAL EXPERIENCE
`
`Cancer Patients Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy
`
`NEUPOGEN has been shown to be safe and effective in accelerating the recovery of
`neutrophil counts following a variety of chemotherapy regimens. In a phase 3 clinical trial
`in small cell lung cancer, patients received SC administration of NEUPOGEN (4 to 8
`mcg/kg/day, days 4 to 17) or placebo. In this study, the benefits of NEUPOGEN therapy
`were shown to be prevention of infection as manifested by febrile neutropenia, decreased
`hospitalization, and decreased IV antibiotic usage. No difference in survival or disease
`progression was demonstrated.
`
`In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in patients
`
`4
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0004
`
`

`
`with small cell lung cancer, patients were randomized to receive NEUPOGEN (n = 99) or
`placebo (n = 111) starting on day 4, after receiving standard dose chemotherapy with
`cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide. A total of 210 patients were evaluated
`for efficacy and 207 evaluated for safety. Treatment with NEUPOGEN resulted in a
`clinically and statistically significant reduction in the incidence of infection, as manifested
`by febrile neutropenia; the incidence of at least one infection over all cycles of
`chemotherapy was 76% (84/111) for placebo-treated patients, versus 40% (40/99) for
`NEUPOGEN-treated patients (p < 0.001). The following secondary analyses were also
`performed. The requirements for in-patient hospitalization and antibiotic use were also
`significantly decreased during the first cycle of chemotherapy; incidence of hospitalization
`was 69% (77/11 l) for placebo-treated patients in cycle 1, versus 52% (51/99) for
`NEUPOGEN-treated patients (p = 0.032). The incidence of IV antibiotic usage was 60%
`(67/111) for placebo-treated patients in cycle 1, versus 38% (38/99) for NEUPOGEN-
`treated patients (p = 0.003). The incidence, severity, and duration of severe neutropenia
`[absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/mm3] following chemotherapy were all
`significantly reduced. The incidence of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 was 84% (83/99) for
`patients receiving NEUPOGEN versus 96% (106/110) for patients receiving placebo (p =
`0.004). Over all cycles, patients randomized to NEUPOGEN had a 57% (286/500 cycles)
`rate of severe neutropenia versus 77% (416/543 cycles) for patients randomized to
`placebo. The median duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 was reduced from 6 days
`(range 0 to 10 days) for patients receiving placebo to 2 days (range 0 to 9 days) for
`patients receiving NEUPOGEN (p < 0.001). The mean duration of neutropenia in cycle 1
`was 5.64 ± 2.27 days for patients receiving placebo versus 2.44 ± 1.90 days for patients
`receiving NEUPOGEN. Over all cycles, the median duration ofneutropenia was 3 days
`for patients randomized to placebo versus 1 day for patients randomized to NEUPOGEN.
`The median severity of neutropenia (as measured by ANC nadir) was 72/mm3 (range
`0/mm3 to 7912/mm3) in cycle 1 for patients receiving NEUPOGEN versus 38/mm3 (range
`0/mm3 to 9520/mm3) for patients receiving placebo (p = 0.012). The mean severity of
`neutropenia in cycle 1 was 496/mm3 ± 1382/mm3 for patients receiving NEUPOGEN
`versus 204/mm3 + 953/mm3 for patients receiving placebo. Over all cycles, the ANC nadir
`for patients randomized to NEUPOGEN was 403/mm3, versus 161/mm3 for patients
`randomized to placebo. Administration of NEUPOGEN resulted in an earlier ANC nadir
`following chemotherapy than was experienced by patients receiving placebo (day 10 vs
`day 12). NEUPOGEN was well tolerated when given SC daily at doses of 4 to 8 mcg/kg
`for up to 14 consecutive days following each cycle of chemotherapy (see ADVERSE
`REACTIONS).
`
`Several other phase 1/2 studies, which did not directly measure the incidence of infection,
`but which did measure increases in neutrophils, support the efficacy of NEUPOGEN. The
`regimens are presented to provide some background on the clinical experience with
`NEUPOGEN. No claim regarding the safety or efficacy of the chemotherapy regimens is
`made. The effects of NEUPOGEN on tumor growth or on the anti-tumor activity of the
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0005
`
`

`
`chemotherapy were not assessed. The doses of NEUPOGEN used in these studies are
`considerably greater than those found to be effective in the phase 3 study described above.
`Such phase 1/2 studies are summarized in the following table.
`
`Type of
`Malignancy
`
`Small Cell
`Lung Cancer
`
`Small Cell
`Lung Cancer11
`
`Urothelial
`Cancer12
`
`Various
`Nonmyeloid
`Malignancies13
`
`Regimen
`
`Chemotherapy
`Dose
`
`No. Trial
`Pts. Phase
`
`NEUPOGEN Daily
`Dosagea
`
`Cyclophosphamide
`Doxorubicin
`Etoposide
`
`Ifosfamide
`Doxorubicin
`Etoposide
`Mesna
`
`Methotrexate
`Vinblastine
`Doxorubicin
`Cisplatin
`
`I g/m2/day
`50 mg/m2/day
`120 mg/m2/day x 3
`q 21 days
`
`5 g/m2/day
`50 mg/m2/day
`120 mg/m2/day x 3
`8 g/m2/day
`q 21 days
`
`30 mg/m2/day x 2
`3 mg/m2/day x 2
`30 mg/m2/day
`70 mg/m2/day
`q 28 days
`
`210
`
`3
`
`4-8 mcg/kg SC
`days 4-17
`
`12
`
`1/2
`
`5.75-46 mcg/kg IV
`days 4-17
`
`40
`
`1/2
`
`3.45-69 mcg/kg IV
`days 4-11
`
`Cyclophosphamide
`Etoposide
`Cisplatin
`
`2.5 g/m2/day x 2
`500 mg/m2/day x 3
`50 mg/m2/day x 3
`q 28 days
`
`18
`
`1/2
`
`23-69 mcg/kgb IV
`days 8-28
`
`Breast/Ovarian
`Cancer14
`
`Doxorubicin~
`
`Neuroblastoma
`
`Cyclophosphamide
`Doxorubicin
`Cisplatin
`
`21
`
`11.5 mcg/kg IV
`days 2-9
`5.75 mcg/kg IV
`days 10-12
`
`12
`
`2
`
`5.45-17.25 mcg/kg SC
`days 6-19
`
`75 mg/m2
`100 mg/m2
`125 mg/m2
`150 mg/m~
`
`q 14 days
`
`150 mg/m2 x 7
`35 mg/m2
`90 mg/m2
`q 28 days
`(cycles 1,3,5) ~t
`
`NEUPOGEN doses were those that accelerated neutrophil production. Doses which provided no additional
`acceleration beyond that achieved at the next lower dose are not reported.
`Lowest dose(s) tested in the study.
`Patients received doxorubicin at either 75, 100, 125, or 150 mg/mz.
`2
`2
`Cycles 2,6 = cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m x 7 and etoposide 280 mg/m x 3.
`Cycle 4 = eisplatin 90 m$/m2 x 1 and etoposide 280 mg/m2 x 3.
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0006
`
`

`
`Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Induction or Consolidation
`Chemotherapy
`
`In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, phase 3 clinical trial, 521
`patients (median age 54, range 16 to 89 years) were treated for de novo acute myeloid
`leukemia (AML). Following a standard induction chemotherapy regimen comprising
`daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside, and etoposide17 (DAV 3÷7+5), patients received
`either NEUPOGEN at 5 mcg/kg/day or placebo, SC, from 24 hours after the last dose of
`chemotherapy until neutrophil recovery (ANC 1000/mm3 for 3 consecutive days or
`10,000/mm3 for 1 day) or for a maximum of 35 days.
`
`Treatment with NEUPOGEN significantly reduced the median time to ANC recovery and
`the median duration of fever, antibiotic use, and hospitalization following induction
`chemotherapy. In the NEUPOGEN-treated group, the median time from initiation of
`chemotherapy to ANC recovery (ANC > 500/mm3) was 20 days (vs 25 days in the control
`group, p = 0.0001), the median duration of fever was reduced by 1.5 days (p = 0.009),
`and there were statistically significant reductions in the durations of IV antibiotic use and
`hospitalization. During consolidation therapy (DAV 2+5+5), patients treated with
`NEUPOGEN also experienced significant reductions in the incidence of severe
`neutropenia, time to neutrophil recovery, the incidence and duration of fever, and in the
`durations of IV antibiotic use and hospitalization. Patients treated with a further course of
`standard (DAV 2+5+5) or high-dose cytosine arabinoside consolidation also experienced
`significant reductions in the duration of neutropenia.
`
`There were no statistically significant differences between NEUPOGEN and placebo
`groups in complete remission rate (69% NEUPOGEN vs 68% placebo, p = 0.77), disease-
`free survival [median 342 days NEUPOGEN (n = 178), 322 days placebo (n = 177), p =
`0.99], time to progression of all randomized patients (median 165 days NEUPOGEN, 186
`days placebo, p = 0.87), or overall survival (median 380 days NEUPOGEN, 425 days
`placebo, p = 0.83).
`
`Cancer Patients Receiving Bone Marrow Transplant
`
`In two separate randomized, controlled trials, patients with Hodgkin’s disease (HD) and
`non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) were treated with myeloablative chemotherapy and
`autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). In one study (n = 54), NEUPOGEN
`was administered at doses of 10 or 30 mcg/kg/day; a third treatment group in this study
`received no NEUPOGEN. A statistically significant reduction in the median number of
`days of severe neutropenia (ANC < 500/mm~) occurred in the NEUPOGEN-treated group
`versus the control group [23 days in the control group, 11 days in the 10 mcg/kg/day
`group, and 14 days in the 30 mcg/kg/day group, (11 days in the combined treatment
`groups, p = 0.004)]. In the second study (n = 44, 43 patients evaluable), NEUPOGEN
`was administered at doses of 10 or 20 mcg/kg/day; a third treatment group in this study
`received no NEUPOGEN. A statistically significant reduction in the median number of
`
`7
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0007
`
`

`
`days of severe neutropenia occurred in the NEUPOGEN-treated group versus the control
`group (21.5 days in the control group and 10 days in both treatment groups, p < 0.001).
`The number of days of febrile neutropenia was also reduced significantly in this study
`[13.5 days in the control group, 5 days in the 10 mcg/kg/day group, and 5.5 days in the 20
`mcgikg/day group, (5 days in the combined treatment groups, p < 0.0001)]. Reductions
`in the number of days of hospitalization and antibiotic use were also seen, although these
`reductions were not statistically significant. There were no effects on red blood cell or
`platelet levels.
`
`In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 70 patients with myeloid and nonmyeloid
`malignancies were treated with myeloablative therapy and allogeneic bone marrow
`transplant followed by 300 mcg/m2/day ofa Filgrastim product. A statistically significant
`reduction in the median number of days of severe neutropenia occurred in the treated
`group versus the control group (19 days in the control group and 15 days in the treatment
`group, p < 0.001) and time to recovery of ANC to > 500/mm3 (21 days in the control
`group and 16 days in the treatment group, p < 0.001).
`
`In three nonrandomized studies (n = 119), patients received ABMT and treatment with
`NEUPOGEN. One study (n = 45) involved patients with breast cancer and malignant
`melanoma. A second study (n = 39) involved patients with HD. The third study (n = 35)
`involved patients with NHL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and germ cell tumor.
`In these studies, the recovery of the ANC to > 500/mm3 ranged from a median of 11.5 to
`13 days.
`
`None of the conditioning regimens used in the ABMT studies included radiation therapy.
`
`While these studies were not designed to compare survival, this information was collected
`and evaluated. The overall survival and disease progression of patients receiving
`NEUPOGEN in these studies were similar to those observed in the respective control
`groups and to historical data.
`
`Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Collection and Therapy in Cancer Patients
`
`All patients in the Amgen-sponsored trials received a similar mobilization/collection
`regimen: NEUPOGEN was administered for 6 to 7 days, with an apheresis procedure on
`days 5, 6, and 7 (except for a limited number of patients receiving apheresis on days 4, 6,
`and 8). In a non-Amgen-sponsored study, patients underwent mobilization to a target
`number of mononuclear cells (MNC), with apheresis starting on day 5. There are no data
`on the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) after days 4 to 5 that are
`not confounded by leukapheresis.
`
`Mobilization: Mobilization of PBPC was studied in 50 heavily pretreated patients
`(median number of prior cycles = 9.5) with NHL, HD, or ALL (Amgen study 1). CFU-
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0008
`
`

`
`GM was used as the marker for engrafiable PBPC. The median CFU-GM level on each
`day of mobilization was determined from the data available (CFU-GM assays were not
`obtained on all patients on each day of mobilization). These data are presented below.
`
`The data from Amgen study 1 were supported by data from Amgen study 2 in which 22
`pretreated breast cancer patients (median number of prior cycles = 3) were studied. Both
`the CFU-GM and CD34÷ cells reached a maximum on day 5 at > 10-fold over baseline and
`then remained elevated with leukapheresis.
`
`Progenitor Cell Levels in Peripheral Blood by Mobilization Day
`
`Overall Study 1
`CFU-GM/mL
`
`Study 2
`CFU-GM/mL
`
`Study 2
`CD34+ (x 104/mL)
`
`No.
`Samples
`
`Median
`(25%-75%)
`
`No.
`Samples
`
`Median
`(25%-75%)
`
`No.
`Samples
`
`Median
`(25%-75%)
`
`Day 1
`
`Day 2
`
`Day 3
`
`Day 4
`
`Day 5
`
`Day 6
`
`Day 7
`
`Day 8
`
`11
`
`7
`
`10
`
`18
`
`36
`
`46
`
`37
`
`15
`
`n/a = not available
`
`18
`(13-62)
`
`22
`(3-61)
`
`138
`(39-364)
`
`365
`(158-864)
`
`781
`(391-1608)
`
`505
`( 199-1397)
`
`333
`(111-938)
`
`383
`(94-815)
`
`20
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`18
`
`21
`
`22
`
`22
`
`12
`
`42
`(15-151)
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`576
`(108-1819)
`
`960
`(72-1677)
`
`756
`(70-3486)
`
`597
`(118-2009)
`
`51
`(10-746)
`
`20
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`17
`
`22
`
`22
`
`21
`
`12
`
`0.13
`(0.02-0.66)
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`2.11
`(0.58-3.93)
`
`3.16
`(1.08-6.11)
`
`2.67
`(1.09-4.40)
`
`2.64
`(0.78-4.22)
`
`1.61
`(0.38-4.31)
`
`In three studies of patients with prior exposure to chemotherapy, the median CFU-GM
`yield in the leukapheresis product ranged from 20.9 to 32.7 x 104/kg body weight (n =
`105). In two of these studies where CD34+ yields in the leukapheresis product were also
`determined, the median CD34+ yields were 3.11 and 2.80 x 106/kg, respectively (n = 56).
`In an additional study of 18 chemotherapy-naive patients, the median CFU-GM yield was
`123.4 x 104/kg.
`
`Engraftment: Engraftment following NEUPOGEN-mobilized PBPC is summarized for
`101 patients in the table below. In all studies a Cox regression model showed that the
`total number of CFU-GM and/or CD34÷ cells collected was a significant predictor of time
`to platelet recovery.
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0009
`
`

`
`In a randomized unblinded study of patients with HD or NHL undergoing myeloablative
`chemotherapy (Amgen study 3), 27 patients received NEUPOGEN-mobilized PBPC
`followed by NEUPOGEN and 31 patients received ABMT followed by NEUPOGEN.
`Patients randomized to the NEUPOGEN-mobilized PBPC group compared to the ABMT
`group had significantly fewer days ofplatelet transfusions (median 6 vs 10 days), a
`significantly shorter time to a sustained platelet count > 20,000/mm3 (median 16 vs 23
`days), a significantly shorter time to recovery of a sustained ANC _> 500/mms (median I 1
`vs 14 days), significantly fewer days of red blood cell transfusions (median 2 vs 3 days)
`and a significantly shorter duration ofposttransplant hospitalization.
`
`Amgen-
`sponsored
`Study !
`N = 13
`
`Amgen-
`sponsored
`Study 2
`N =22
`
`Amgen-
`sponsored
`Study3
`N =27
`
`Non-Amgen-
`sponsored
`Study
`N=39
`
`Median PBPCikg Collected
`
`MNC
`
`9.5 x 108
`
`9.5 x 10s
`
`8.l x 108
`
`CD34"
`
`n/a
`
`3,1 x 106
`
`, 2.8 x 106
`
`CFU-GM 63.9 x 104
`
`25.3 x 104
`
`32.6 x 104
`
`Days to ANC > 500/mm3
`
`Median
`Range
`
`Days to Pit. > 20,000/rnm3 Median
`
`Range
`
`9
`8-10
`
`10
`
`7-16
`
`10
`8-15
`
`12.5
`
`10-30
`
`11
`9-38
`
`16
`
`8-52
`
`10.3 x 108
`
`6,2 x 106
`
`n/a
`
`10
`7-40
`
`15.5
`
`7-63
`
`n/a -- not available
`
`Three of the 101 patients (3%) did not achieve the criteria for engraftment as defined by a
`platelet count > 20,000/ram3 by day 28. In clinical trials of NEUPOGEN for the
`mobilization of PBPC, NEUPOGEN was administered to patients at 5 to 24 mcg/kg/day
`after reinfusion of the collected cells until a sustainable ANC (> 500/mm3) was reached.
`The rate of engraftment of these cells in the absence ofNEUPOGEN posttransplantation
`has not been studied.
`
`Patients With Severe Chronic Neutropenia
`
`Severe chronic neutropenia (SCN) (idiopathic, cyclic, and congenital) is characterized by
`a selective decrease in the number of circulating neutrophils and an enhanced susceptibility
`to bacterial infections.
`
`The daily administration of NEUPOGEN has been shown to be safe and effective in
`causing a sustained increase in the neutrophil count and a decrease in infectious morbidity
`
`10
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0010
`
`

`
`in children and adults with the clinical syndrome of SCN.15 In the phase 3 trial,
`summarized in the following table, daily treatment with NEUPOGEN resulted in
`significant beneficial changes in the incidence and duration of infection, fever, antibiotic
`use, and oropharyngeal ulcers. In this trial, 120 patients with a median age of 12 years
`(range 1 to 76 years) were treated.
`
`Overall Significant Changes in Clinical Endpoints Median Incidencea
`(Events) or Duration (Days) per 28-day Period
`
`Control
`Patientsb
`
`NEUPOGEN-treated
`Patients
`
`p-value
`
`Incidence of Infection
`
`Incidence of Fever
`
`Duration of Fever
`
`Incidence of
`Oropharyngeal Ulcers
`
`Incidence of Antibiotic Use
`
`0.50
`
`0.25
`
`0.63
`
`0.26
`
`0.49
`
`0.20
`
`0.20
`
`0.20
`
`0.00
`
`0.20
`
`< 0.001
`
`< 0.001
`
`0.005
`
`< 0.001
`
`< 0.001
`
`Incidence values were calculated for each patient, and are defined as the total number of events
`experienced divided by the number of 28-day periods of exposure (on-study). Median incidence
`values were then reported for each patient group.
`
`Control patients were observed for a 4-month period.
`
`The incidence for each of these five clinical parameters was lower in the NEUPOGEN arm
`compared to the control arm for cohorts in each of the three major diagnostic categories.
`All three diagnostic groups showed favorable trends in favor of treatment. An analysis of
`variance showed no significant interaction between treatment and diagnosis, suggesting
`that efficacy did not differ substantially in the different diseases. Although NEUPOGEN
`substantially reduced neutropenia in all patient groups, in patients with cyclic neutropenia,
`cycling persisted but the period of neutropenia was shortened to 1 day.
`
`As a result of the lower incidence and duration of infections, there was also a lower
`number of episodes of hospitalization [28 hospitalizations in 62 patients in the treated
`group vs 44 hospitalizations in 60 patients in the control group over a 4-month period (p =
`0.0034)]. Patients treated with NEUPOGEN also reported a lower number of episodes of
`diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and sore throat.
`
`In the phase 3 trial, untreated patients had a median ANC of210/mm3 (range 0 to
`
`11
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0011
`
`

`
`1550/mm3). NEUPOGEN therapy was adjusted to maintain the median ANC between
`1500 and 10,000/mm3. Overall, the response to NEUPOGEN was observed in 1 to 2
`weeks. The median ANC after 5 months of NEUPOGEN therapy for all patients was
`7460/mm3 (range 30 to 30,880/mm3). NEUPOGEN dosing requirements were generally
`higher for patients with congenital neutropenia (2.3 to 40 mcg/kg/day) than for patients
`with idiopathic (0.6 to 11.5 mcg/kg/day) or cyclic (0.5 to 6 mcg/kg/day) neutropenia.
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`
`Cancer Patients Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy
`
`NEUPOGEN is indicated to decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile
`neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anti-
`cancer drugs associated with a significant incidence of severe neutropenia with fever (see
`CLINICAL EXPERIENCE). A complete blood count (CBC) and platelet count should
`be obtained prior to chemotherapy, and twice per week (see LABORATORY
`MONITORING) during NEUPOGEN therapy to avoid leukocytosis and to monitor the
`neutrophil count. In phase 3 clinical studies, NEUPOGEN therapy was discontinued
`when the ANC was > 10,000/mm3 after the expected chemotherapy-induced nadir.
`
`Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Induction or Consolidation
`Chemotherapy
`
`NEUPOGEN is indicated for reducing the time to neutrophil recovery and the duration of
`fever, following induction or consolidation chemotherapy treatment of adults with AML.
`
`Cancer Patients Receiving Bone Marrow Transplant
`
`NEUPOGEN is indicated to reduce the duration of neutropenia and neutropenia-related
`clinical sequelae, eg, febrile neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies
`undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy followed by marrow transplantation (see
`CLINICAL EXPERIENCE). It is recommended that CBCs and platelet counts be
`obtained at a minimum of three times per week (see LABORATORY MONITORING)
`following marrow infusion to monitor the recovery of marrow reconstitution.
`
`Patients Undergoing Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Collection and Therapy
`
`NEUPOGEN is indicated for the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells into the
`peripheral blood for collection by leukapheresis. Mobilization allows for the collection of
`increased numbers of progenitor cells capable of engraftment compared with collection by
`leukapheresis without mobilization or bone marrow harvest. After myeloablative
`chemotherapy, the transplantation of an increased number of progenitor cells can lead to
`more rapid engraftment, which may result in a decreased need for supportive care (see
`
`12
`
`Sandoz Inc. IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly, Exhibit 1072-0012
`
`

`
`CLINICAL EXPERIENCE).
`
`Patients With Severe Chronic Neutropenia
`
`NEUPOGEN is indicated for chronic administration to reduce the incidence and duration
`of sequelae of neutropenia (eg, fever, infections, oropharyngeal ulcers) in symptomatic
`patients with congenital neutropenia, cyclic neutropenia, or idiopathic neutropenia (see
`CLINICAL EXPERIENCE). It is essential that serial CBCs with differential and platelet
`counts, and an evaluation of bone marrow morphology and karyotype be performed prior
`to initiation of NEUPOGEN therapy. The use of NEUPOGEN prior to confirmation of
`SCN may impair diagnostic efforts and may thus impair or delay evaluation and treatment
`of an underlying condition, other than SCN, causing the neutropenia.
`
`C ONTRAINDICATIONS
`
`NEUPOGEN is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to E coli-derived
`proteins, Filgrastim, or any component of the product.
`
`WARNINGS
`
`Allergic-type reactions occurring on initial or subsequent treatment have been reported in
`< 1 in 4000 patients treated with NEUPOGEN. These have generally been characterized
`by systemic symptoms involving at least two body systems, most often skin (rash,
`urticaria, facial edema), respiratory (wheezing, dyspnea), and cardiovascular
`(hypotension, tachycardia). Some reactions occurred o

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket