throbber
Homocysteine and Methylmalonic Acid: Markers to Predict and
`Supported by Eli
`Avoid Toxicity from Pemetrexed Therapy 1
`illy and Company.
`
`1L
`
`let Niyikiza, Sharyn D. Baker, David E. Seitz, et al.
`
`(cid:160)C
`
`Mol Cancer Ther
`
` 2002;1:545-552. Published online May 1, 2002.
`
`Updated Version
`
`Access the most recent version of this article at:
`
` http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/1/7/545
`
`Cited Articles
`
`This article cites 29 articles, 13 of which you can access for free at:
`
`http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/1/7/545.full.html#ref-list-1
`
`Citing Articles
`
`This article has been cited by 44 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at:
`
` http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/1/7/545.full.html#related-urls
`
`E-mail alerts
`Reprints and
`Subscriptions
`Permissions
`
`
`
` related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
`
`To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
`.
`pubs@aacr.org
`Department at
`
`To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications
`.
`permissions@aacr.org
`Department at
`
`
`mct.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
` on January 18, 2011
` American Association for Cancer Research
`(cid:160)Copyright © 2002
`
`
`Lilly Ex. 2110
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`
`Vol. 1, 545–552, May 2002
`
`Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
`
`545
`
`Homocysteine and Methylmalonic Acid: Markers to Predict
`and Avoid Toxicity from Pemetrexed Therapy1
`
`Clet Niyikiza,2 Sharyn D. Baker, David E. Seitz,
`Jackie M. Walling, Katrina Nelson,
`James J. Rusthoven, Sally P. Stabler, Paolo Paoletti,
`A. Hilary Calvert, and Robert H. Allen
`Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
`46285 [C. N., K. N., J. J. R., P. P.]; Cancer Treatment and Research
`Center (CTRC), University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas 78229
`[S. D. B.]; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
`46202 [D. E. S.]; Lilly Research Laboratories, Tularik Inc, South San
`Francisco, California 94080 [J. M. W.]; University of Colorado Health
`Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80220 [S. P. S., R. H. A.]; and
`University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United
`Kingdom NE4 6BE [A. H. C.]
`
`Abstract
`The purpose of this study was to identify predictive
`factors for severe toxicity caused by antifolate-
`chemotherapy using pemetrexed (ALIMTA, LY231514),
`as a model. Data on potential predictive factors for
`severe toxicity from pemetrexed were collected from
`246 patients treated between 1995 and 1999.
`Multivariate stepwise regression methods were used to
`identify markers predictive of severe toxicity. Using a
`multiple logistic regression model allowed us to
`quantify the relative risk of developing toxicities and to
`generate a validated clinical hypothesis on ways to
`improve the safety profile of pemetrexed. Pretreatment
`total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) levels significantly
`predict severe thrombocytopenia and neutropenia with
`or without associated grade 3/4 diarrhea, mucositis, or
`infection. Pretreatment methylmalonic acid (MMA)
`levels significantly and independently predict grade 3/4
`diarrhea and mucositis; however, these toxicities are
`still predicted by tHcy alone. Patients with elevated
`baseline levels of tHcy alone, or of both tHcy and
`MMA, were found to have a high risk of severe toxicity
`that led us to postulate that reducing tHcy would result
`in a reduction of severe toxicity with no harm to
`efficacy. This study points out for the first time the
`importance of pretreatment tHcy levels in predicting
`severe toxicity associated with an antifolate and sets
`the stage for a prospective clinical intervention to
`protect patients from pemetrexed-induced severe
`toxicity and possibly improve the drug’s efficacy.
`Antifolates as a class have been associated with
`sporadic severe myelosuppression with gastrointestinal
`toxicity. Although infrequent, a combination of such
`toxicities can carry a high risk of mortality. This
`phenomenon had been unpredictable until now. Our
`
`work shows that by measuring tHcy, one can identify
`patients that are at risk of toxicity before treatment.
`Most importantly, decreasing homocysteine levels via
`vitamin supplementation leads to a better safety profile
`of pemetrexed and possibly to an improved efficacy.
`
`Introduction
`In 1998, it was estimated that 90% of new anticancer agents
`designed in laboratories around the world never make it into
`routine clinical use (1). Three main reasons were put forth for
`this sobering statistic: (a) high toxicity seen with new agents
`that carry serious safety concerns; (b) lack of efficacy of
`these agents; and (c) a disconnect between the work of
`preclinical bench scientists and bedside clinicians that often
`reflected a failure to ensure that clinical trial designs for new
`agents were based on the best-known mechanism of action
`of the agent.
`Because most anticancer agents have a narrow therapeu-
`tic window, optimizing the chance that a treatment succeeds
`without causing undue harm to the patient is of paramount
`importance. Accurate information about both the new drug
`and the patient becomes critical. Interruption of development
`of a new drug or limitation of its effectiveness or wide use
`occurs when either severe toxicity or lack of efficacy is noted.
`It is not unusual that, when a new agent shows toxicity with
`limited antitumor activity, little effort is made to persistently
`look for ways to circumvent the toxicity with the possibility of
`improving efficacy. Toxicity or lack of efficacy could be re-
`lated to a patient’s individual clinical, demographic, or ge-
`netic profile. Ideally, the goal is to devise a simple, optimal
`dosing strategy for a new agent that incorporates what is
`known about its mechanism of action and about the patient
`characteristics. This paradigm is the subject of the present
`study. We discuss how, after serious safety concerns arose,
`predictive factors for severe toxicity associated with pem-
`etrexed were identified, and how these factors led to the
`formulation of a clinical intervention to modulate the toxicity
`of this antifolate/anticancer agent while improving its effi-
`cacy. The results of this prospective clinical intervention are
`the subject of a separate upcoming publication.3
`Antifolates represent one of the most extensively investi-
`gated classes of antineoplastic agents, with aminopterin ini-
`tially demonstrating clinical activity more than 50 years ago
`(2). Methotrexate was developed shortly thereafter and, to-
`day, is a standard component of chemotherapeutic regimens
`effective for malignancies such as lymphoma, breast cancer,
`and head and neck cancer (3– 6). The cytotoxic activity and
`subsequent effectiveness of antifolates can be associated
`
`Received 3/1/02; revised 3/25/02; accepted 3/28/02.
`1 Supported by Eli Lilly and Company.
`2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Eli Lilly and
`Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285.
`
`3 J. Rusthoven, C. Niyikiza, P. Bunn, et al. Reducing toxicity from pem-
`etrexed therapy with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation, submit-
`ted for publication.
`
`mct.aacrjournals.org
`Downloaded from
` on January 18, 2011
` American Association for Cancer Research
`(cid:160)Copyright © 2002
`
`
`Lilly Ex. 2110
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`546 Homocysteine and MMA Are Predictive Markers
`
`with substantial toxicity for some patients. Antifolates, as a
`class, have been associated with sporadic severe myelosup-
`pression with gastrointestinal toxicity. Although infrequent, a
`combination of such toxicities, can carry a high risk of mor-
`tality. The inability to control these toxicities has led to the
`discontinuation of clinical development of some antifolates,
`such as CB3717, and has complicated the clinical develop-
`ment of others, such as lometrexol and raltitrexed (7–9). The
`ability to predict those patients that are at greater risk of
`developing severe toxicity would represent an important ad-
`vantage in the use of these agents.
`Lometrexol
`[LY249543 (disodium form); Lilly Research
`Laboratories, Tularik Inc., South San Francisco, CA), an an-
`tifolate GARFT4 inhibitor was curtailed in its development by
`Lilly because of severe and cumulative toxicities. The onset
`of profound myelosuppression and/or mucositis, in most
`patients 6 – 8 weeks after dosing, prevented repeated admin-
`istration of this anticancer agent in most studies. This led to
`additional studies in mice (10 –11) that revealed that thera-
`peutic efficacy and toxicity of lometrexol were highly de-
`pendent on dietary folic acid intake. A subsequent Phase I
`study showed that lometrexol toxicity could be modulated by
`folic acid supplementation and that the maximum tolerated
`dose could be substantially increased (8). Yet, pharmacoki-
`netic studies conducted with 5 mg of folic acid supplemen-
`tation suggested that folic acid was not acting by enhancing
`lometrexol plasma clearance (12). Despite a 5-year effort in a
`series of preclinical and clinical investigations, researchers
`were still unable to ascertain the mechanism responsible for
`the reduction in lometrexol toxicity. The lometrexol experi-
`ence was useful when a second generation GARFT inhibitor
`(LY249543; Eli Lilly and Company), entered its clinical devel-
`opment with 5 mg of folic acid supplementation 2 days
`before, the day of, and 2 days after, as part of standard
`dosage of this anticancer agent. The development was also
`curtailed because of toxicity leaving some investigators to
`suspect that the folic acid supplementation regimen that was
`used was likely inadequate.
`It is with this background on antifolate GARFT inhibitors
`that pemetrexed (ALIMTA, LY231514; Eli Lilly and Company,
`Indianapolis, IN) clinical development was undertaken. Pem-
`etrexed is a multitargeted antifolate that has demonstrated
`broad-spectrum antitumor activity in the Phase II setting and
`is currently undergoing active clinical development (13). This
`new generation antifolate inhibits several key folate-requiring
`enzymes of the thymidine and purine biosynthetic pathways,
`in particular, thymidylate synthase, DHFR, and GARFT, by
`competing with reduced folate for binding sites (14). The
`consequent inhibition of intracellular folate metabolism leads
`to the inhibition of cell growth.
`During the course of pemetrexed clinical development,
`myelosuppression emerged as the principal drug-related
`toxicity, with 50% of all patients experiencing grade 3/4
`
`4 The abbreviations used are: GARFT, glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl-
`transferase; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; MMA, methylmalonic acid;
`tHcy, total plasma homocysteine; PS, performance status; AP, alkaline
`phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase;
`AIRCARFT, aminoimidazocarboxamide ribonucleotide formultransferase.
`
`Fig. 1. Folate and homocysteine metabolism.
`
`neutropenia (13). In particular, Grade 4 neutropenia with
`grade 3/4 infection, grade 3/4 diarrhea, or grade 3/4 mucosi-
`tis became life threatening. These toxicities, occurring typi-
`cally after two cycles of therapy, prompted a renewed ag-
`gressive clinical effort to search for ways to avoid them.
`Given the relevance of folic acid to the toxicity profile
`previously witnessed with an antifolate such as lometrexol, it
`was reasonable to postulate that functional folate status
`could be a useful predictor of toxicity from treatment with
`pemetrexed. The significant reciprocal association of hom-
`ocysteine to serum folate and RBC folate has been well
`established (15–16), and, thus, tHcy concentration may be
`used as a measure of functional folate status. Folates are
`required for the metabolism of tHcy, which is converted to
`methionine by the transfer of a methyl group from the co-
`substrate 5-methytetrahydrofolate by methionine synthase,
`an enzyme that also requires the cofactor methylcobalamin
`(Vitamin B12). Thus, under conditions of folate and/or cobal-
`amin deficiency, tHcy concentrations rise (Refs. 17–18; see
`Fig. 1). Because the enzyme L-methylmalonyl CoA mutase is
`vitamin B12 dependent, a B12 deficiency will lead to an in-
`crease in MMA (19). MMA concentrations are, therefore, a
`useful tool in differentiating folate and cobalamin deficiency
`(17–18).
`Because of previous observations on the impact of folic
`acid supplementation on the toxicity profile of lometrexol, a
`Phase I study of pemetrexed with 5 mg of folic acid 2 days
`before, the day of, and 2 days after, dosing was initiated. It
`was shown that the maximum tolerated dose could be sub-
`stantially increased (20). Still unanswered was the question
`pertaining to the precise mechanism responsible for the re-
`duction in lometrexol and pemetrexed toxicity when a patient
`receives folic acid supplementation. To find an answer, a
`programmatic change was made during the Phase II clinical
`development of pemetrexed to collect from all treated pa-
`tients a number of vitamin deficiency markers. Included in
`the panel of markers were the folic acid and/or vitamins B12
`deficiency markers, tHcy and MMA, and the vitamin B6 de-
`ficiency marker, cystathionine. This study provided initial
`answers. The objective was to identify one or more specific
`factors that might predict for pemetrexed-induced toxicity
`
`mct.aacrjournals.org
`Downloaded from
` on January 18, 2011
` American Association for Cancer Research
`(cid:160)Copyright © 2002
`
`
`Lilly Ex. 2110
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
`
`547
`
`collected before pemetrexed treatment. These variables in-
`cluded age; gender; baseline PS; prior chemotherapy; tumor
`type; and pre-pemetrexed-treatment serum albumin, liver
`enzymes, AP, ALT, AST, platelet count, absolute neutrophil
`count, calculated area under the curve (AUC), and vitamin
`deficiency markers including tHcy, cystathionine, and MMA.
`Vitamin deficiency markers were measured over time before
`each cycle of treatment as long as the patient remained on
`study. Weekly laboratory studies included complete blood
`cell and differential WBC counts, serum creatinine, total bil-
`irubin, ALT, AST, and AP. Vitamin deficiency markers were
`quantified using previously published methods (21). Normal
`ranges were determined previously using 50 blood donors
`(25 male, 25 female; ages, 18 – 65) at the Belle Bonfils Blood
`in Denver, Colorado. Whole blood was allowed to clot for 1 h
`at room temperature before serum was collected. Values
`were calculated as the mean ⫾ 2 SDs after log normalization.
`In the multivariate statistical search for predictive factors
`for toxicity, dependent outcome variables included the fol-
`lowing worst-grade toxicities: (a) grade 4 neutropenia; (b)
`grade 4 thrombocytopenia; (c) grade 3 or 4 mucositis; (d)
`grade 3 or 4 diarrhea; (e) grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 or
`4 infection; and (f) grade 4 hematological toxicity or grade 3
`or 4 nonhematological toxicity, where a patient experienced
`any or a combination of the above-listed toxicities. Toxicity
`was graded according to the National Cancer Institute com-
`mon toxicity criteria (22).
`To identify the most statistically significant predictive fac-
`tor(s) for a given toxicity, multivariate stepwise regression
`methods were used whereby variables significant at the 0.25
`level were entered into the model and those not significant at
`the 0.10 level were removed from the model. At each step, a
`test was performed to verify that the factors included in the
`model significantly impacted the toxicity of interest (23).
`To assess the risk of developing severe hematological or
`nonhematological toxicities associated with the vitamin de-
`ficiency marker of tHcy, alone or with MMA, at study entry, a
`multiple logistic regression analysis was performed sepa-
`rately for tHcy and MMA while adjusting for the other inde-
`pendent factors (23). Quartiles were determined for each
`marker using baseline distribution of
`the marker levels.
`Ranges were defined using these quartiles to calculate the
`risk of toxicity for a given patient falling within a specific
`range. Odds ratios were also calculated as a measure of the
`extent to which the risk of severe toxicity was affected as
`baseline tHcy and MMA levels fell above or below the se-
`lected reference range.
`
`Results
`A total of 1063 courses of pemetrexed were administered.
`The number of courses per patient ranged from 1 to 17
`cycles with a mean of 4 cycles. There were an equal number
`of males and females (Table 1). Age ranged from 25 to 90
`years (mean, 57.8 years), and 25% of the patients were 65
`years or older. Ninety percent of patients had a PS of 0 or 1.
`Myelosuppression was the major toxicity encountered (Ta-
`ble 2). Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in ⬃32% of the pa-
`tients, whereas the presence of grade 4 hematological or
`grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicity was observed in 37%
`
`Fig. 2. Patient population description.
`
`such as baseline patient characteristics, cumulative dose,
`and baseline levels of the vitamin deficiency markers tHcy,
`MMA, and cystathionine.
`
`Patients and Methods
`Patient Population. A total of 305 of the 1300 patients,
`treated in Phases I and II between September 1995 and
`November 1995, had the vitamin deficiency markers of tHcy,
`MMA, and cystathionine collected before and during pem-
`etrexed therapy. Pemetrexed was developed with doses of
`500 mg or 600 mg/m2 every 21 days. Other dosing schedules
`were explored early in the Phase 1 program but were found
`not to be feasible for further development. To eliminate the
`complicating factor of folic acid supplementation on toxicity
`and the impact of doses not pursued, any patient who re-
`ceived folic acid supplementation at any point during therapy
`or who received any dosing regimen other than pemetrexed
`500 – 600 mg/m2, was removed from the analysis. This left a
`final sample size of 246 patients with data on vitamin defi-
`ciency markers (see Fig. 2).
`Protocol and informed consent documents were approved
`by each site’s Ethical Review Board before the enrollment of
`any patient. All of the patients were informed of the nature of
`the study, and all of the patients signed a written informed
`consent document before enrollment.
`Data Collection and Statistical Analysis. Data from mul-
`tiple, potentially predictive (or independent) variables were
`
`mct.aacrjournals.org
`Downloaded from
` on January 18, 2011
` American Association for Cancer Research
`(cid:160)Copyright © 2002
`
`
`Lilly Ex. 2110
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`548 Homocysteine and MMA Are Predictive Markers
`
`Table 1 Patient demographics and baseline folic acid, B6, and B12 vitamin deficiency markers
`
`Study
`
`Age (no. of
`patients)
`
`Gender (no. of
`patients)
`
`⬍65 ⱖ65 Male
`
`Female
`
`BSAa (m2)
`mean, range
`
`PS
`(no. of
`patients)
`
`tHcy (␮mol/liter)
`mean, range
`
`Cyst (␮mol/liter)
`mean, range
`
`MMA (nmol/liter)
`mean, range
`
`Phase I combination,b n ⫽ 79
`Phase II
`Colorectal cancer, n ⫽ 35
`Pancreas cancer, n ⫽ 41
`Esophageal and gastric
`cancer, n ⫽ 23
`Breast cancer, n ⫽ 46
`Cervical cancer, n ⫽ 9
`NSCLC cancer, n ⫽ 13
`
`61
`
`24
`26
`16
`
`42
`8
`9
`
`18
`
`11
`15
`7
`
`4
`1
`4
`
`51
`
`22
`23
`17
`
`0
`0
`10
`
`28
`
`13
`18
`6
`
`46
`9
`3
`
`1.89, 1.27–2.47
`
`1.90, 1.45–2.23
`1.85, 1.22–2.61
`1.69, 1.26–2.22
`
`1.77, 1.48–2.22
`1.61, 1.25–1.97
`1.84, 1.30–2.16
`
`0–1
`
`79
`
`31
`34
`21
`
`42
`9
`11
`
`2
`
`7
`
`4
`7
`2
`
`4
`0
`2
`
`9.06, 3.6–27.4
`
`376, 98–2481
`
`206, 67–1065
`
`11.7, 6–22.5
`12.8, 4.7–132.4
`12.6, 6.3–31.9
`
`224, 50–1303
`235, 52–869
`250, 87–718
`
`9.0, 4.3–20.5
`7.7, 5.4–10.5
`9.1, 3.7–15.4
`
`396, 80–2234
`155, 89–282
`533, 198–1921
`
`280, 68–2170
`341, 29–8507
`262, 96–1192
`
`173, 79–734
`223, 78–482
`179, 97–303
`
`Total patients
`
`Mean values
`
`186
`
`60
`
`123
`
`123
`
`224 22
`
`1.84, 1.22–2.61
`
`10.3, 3.5–132.4
`
`309, 50–2481
`
`237, 29–8507
`
`a BSA, body surface area; Cyst, cystathionine; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.
`b Patients with different primary tumor types.
`
`Table 2 Prevalence of selected toxicities in patients treated with
`pemetrexed (n ⫽ 246)
`
`Toxicity
`
`Grade 4 neutropenia
`Grade 4 thrombocytopenia
`Grade 3/4 mucositis
`Grade 3/4 diarrhea
`Any grade 4 hematological toxicity or grade 3/4
`nonhematological toxicity
`Grade 4 neutropenia ⫹ grade 3/4 mucositis
`Grade 4 neutropenia ⫹ grade 3/4 diarrhea
`Grade 4 neutropenia ⫹ grade 3/4 infection
`
`No. of
`patients %
`79
`32
`20
`8
`12
`5
`15
`6
`92
`37
`
`8
`8
`6
`
`3
`3
`2
`
`of the patients. Grade 4 neutropenia coupled with grade 3 or
`4 diarrhea was observed in 3% of patients.
`Baseline tHcy and MMA were found to be highly correlated
`(R2 ⫽ 0.8870). The analysis performed to further assess the
`impact of this correlation (both with and without MMA, as an
`independent variable) revealed an important interaction be-
`tween these two vitamin deficiency markers with respect to
`pemetrexed induced toxicity. tHcy correlated significantly
`with severe hematological toxicity, as well as with severe
`diarrhea and severe neutropenia, whether or not MMA was
`included in the model (significance levels are shown in Table
`3). Interestingly, when MMA was included as an independent
`variable in the model, it was significantly correlated with
`diarrhea and mucositis, whereas tHcy was not. However,
`when MMA was excluded from the analysis, the model se-
`lected tHcy as the main predictor for diarrhea and mucositis.
`The prevalence of selected severe toxicities was found to
`increase as pretreatment tHcy and MMA levels increased
`(see Fig. 3). A ␹2 test for trend (24) indicated significantly
`increased prevalence of severe toxicities with increased pre-
`treatment levels of tHcy (grade 4 neutropenia, P ⫽ 0.0185;
`grade 4 thrombocytopenia, P ⫽ 0.0002; and grade 4 neu-
`tropenia ⫹ grade 3/4 infection, P ⫽ 0.0064), and MMA (grade
`4 neutropenia, P ⬍ 0.0001 and grade 4 neutropenia ⫹ grade
`3/4 diarrhea, P ⫽ 0.0005). This trend was seen also with
`selected hematological and nonhematological toxicity (see
`
`Fig. 4). Statistically significant increases in prevalence of
`severe hematological or nonhematological toxicity with in-
`creasing pretreatment levels were observed for MMA (P ⫽
`0.0001), homocysteine (P ⫽ 0.0011), and for tHcy and MMA
`quartile intersections (P ⫽ 0.0014). The most dramatic in-
`crease in such toxicities was observed in patients with si-
`multaneous elevations of both markers, in which 15 of 19
`patients experienced severe toxicity.
`Using quartile-defined ranges, we performed multiple lo-
`gistic regression analyses, including the same independent
`variables reported in Table 3. These analyses were run sep-
`arately for tHcy and MMA and are reported in Fig. 5. In
`addition, the relative risk for a patient whose pretreatment
`levels fell above the third quartile for both homocysteine
`(⬎11.5 ␮mol/liter) and MMA (⬎219.3 nmol/liter) was re-
`ported. The tHcy interquartile range of 7.4 –11.5 ␮mol/liter in
`this study is similar to that considered a normal range in the
`cardiovascular literature (25–28). As a result, the interquartile
`range of 7.4 –11.5 ␮mol/liter was used as the normal range
`for the purpose of relative risk assessment for toxicity (see
`Fig. 5C). Patients with pretreatment tHcy levels below 7.5
`␮mol/liter had an odds ratio of 0.7, a 30% reduction in the
`risk of developing a severe toxicity when compared with
`patients with normal baseline tHcy. This risk reduction was
`not found to be statistically significant (P ⫽ 0.3672). Patients
`with baseline tHcy levels above 11.5 ␮mol/liter had an odds
`ratio of 3.1, a 300% increase in the risk of developing a
`severe hematological or nonhematological
`toxicity when
`compared again to those patients with normal baseline tHcy.
`This increase in the risk was found to be highly statistically
`significant (P ⫽ 0.0040).
`Using MMA interquartile range as reference in the analysis,
`we showed that patients with baseline MMA ⬍119.0 nmol/
`liter had a statistically significant decrease in risk of severe
`toxicity, with an odds ratio of 0.3 when compared with that of
`patients with MMA in the reference range of 119.0 –219.3
`nmol/liter. Patients whose MMA was ⬎219.3 nmol/liter had a
`borderline significant increase in risk, with an odds ratio of
`2.2 when compared with the same reference range (Fig. 5C).
`
`
`mct.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
` on January 18, 2011
` American Association for Cancer Research
`(cid:160)Copyright © 2002
`
`
`Lilly Ex. 2110
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
`
`549
`
`Table 3 Factors selected as significantly correlated to severe toxicity (n ⫽ 246)a
`
`Dependent variable
`
`G4b neutropenia
`
`G4 neutropenia ⫹
`G3/4 infection
`
`G4
`thrombocytopenia
`
`G3/4
`diarrhea
`
`Correlated independent
`variable (P)
`
`Homocysteine
`(P ⫽ 0.003)
`PS (P ⫽ 0.03)
`
`Combination
`therapy
`(P ⫽ 0.01)
`
`Homocysteine
`(P ⬍ 0.0001)
`
`Homocysteine
`(P ⬍ 0.0001)
`Baseline ANC
`(P ⫽ 0.02)
`
`MMA
`(P ⬍ 0.0001)
`
`a Total homocysteine and MMA are correlated at R2 ⫽ 0.8830.
`b G4, grade 4; G3/4, grade 3/4; ANC, absolute neutrophil count.
`
`G4 neutropenia
`⫹ G3/4 diarrhea
`
`Homocysteine
`(P ⬍ 0.0001)
`
`G3/4 mucositis
`
`MMA
`(P ⬍ 0.0001)
`Baseline ANC
`(P ⫽ 0.0005)
`
`Fig. 3. Prevalence of selected
`toxicities by homocysteine and
`MMA quartile.
`(homocysteine
`quartiles in ␮M: ⬍7.4, 7.4 –9.2,
`9.3–11.5, and ⬎11.5; MMA quar-
`tiles in nM: ⬍119, 119 –156.5,
`156.6 –219.3, and ⬎219.3). The
`␹2 test for trend indicated a sta-
`tistically significantly different in-
`cidence of certain toxicities in
`different quartiles for both hom-
`ocysteine (G4 neutropenia, P ⫽
`0.0185; G4 thrombocytopenia,
`P ⫽ 0.0002; and G4 neutropenia
`⫹ G3/4 infection, P ⫽ 0.0064)
`and MMA (G4 neutropenia, P ⬍
`0.0001; and G4 neutropenia ⫹
`G3/4 diarrhea, P ⫽ 0.0005).
`
`Patients with baseline tHcy (⬎11.5 ␮mol/liter) and MMA
`(⬎219.3 nmol/liter) levels above the third quartile had an
`odds ratio of 15.6 when compared with those with pretreat-
`ment tHcy levels in the normal range (see Fig. 5C, white bar).
`An similar increase in risk was seen when toxicity prevalence
`in this patient group was evaluated relative to MMA reference
`ranges of 119.0 –219.3 nmol/liter with an odd ratios 6.0 (see
`Fig. 5C, white bar).
`
`Discussion
`Potentially life-threatening toxicity remains a major limitation
`to the optimal administration of commonly used chemother-
`apeutic agents. In some cases, a supportive intervention has
`been clinically indicated in an attempt to counter undesired
`side effects and, hence, to permit safe, maximal dosing of a
`chemotherapeutic agent. Such is indeed the case with the
`use of corticosteroids and antihistamines to prevent anaphy-
`lactic reactions to taxanes, or the use of hydration to reduce
`nephrotoxicity from cisplatin. The ability to predict which
`patients are more likely to experience drug-associated
`toxicity from pretreatment characteristics represents an im-
`portant improvement in the management of this problem.
`Antifolates have been associated with sporadic severe
`
`Fig. 4. Prevalence of any grade 4 hematological or grade 3/4 nonhema-
`tological toxicity in each homocysteine and MMA quartile, as well as in
`each quartile intersection. (Q1 intersection: n ⫽ 24; Q2 intersection: n ⫽
`15; Q3 intersection: n ⫽ 11; Q4 intersection: n ⫽ 19). Statistically signif-
`icant increases in the prevalence of severe hematological or nonhemato-
`logical toxicity by increasing quartile were observed for MMA (P ⫽
`0.0001), homocysteine (P ⫽ 0.0011), and for total homocysteine and MMA
`quartile intersections (P ⫽ 0.0014).
`
`mct.aacrjournals.org
`Downloaded from
` on January 18, 2011
` American Association for Cancer Research
`(cid:160)Copyright © 2002
`
`
`Lilly Ex. 2110
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`550 Homocysteine and MMA Are Predictive Markers
`
`Fig. 5. Risk of developing any severe hematological or nonhematological toxicity in relation to a total homocysteine (tHcy): reference range, 7.4 –11.5 (A);
`total homocysteine (tHcy) reference range, ⬍7.4 (B); MMA reference range, ⬍119.0 (C); and MMA reference range, 119.0 –219.3 (D). A, a: odds ratio, 0.7;
`95% confidence interval (CI), 0.3–1.6; P ⫽ 0.3672; b: odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 – 6.7; P ⫽ 0.0040; c: odds ratio, 15.6; 95% CI, 3.6 –96.9; P ⫽ 0.0008. B,
`a: odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.6 –3.4; P ⫽ 0.36; b: odds ratio, 8.8; 95% CI, 2.7–32.8; P ⫽ 0.0006; c: odds ratio, 50.5; 95% CI, 4.5–1222.8; P ⫽ 0.0049. C,
`a: odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1– 0.7; P ⫽ 0.0058; b: odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.0 – 4.7; P ⫽ 0.0365; c: odds ratio, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.6 –30.0; P ⫽ 0.0131. D, a:
`odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5–7.9; P ⫽ 0.0058; b: odds ratio, 12.5; 95% CI, 3.6 –54.7; P ⫽ 0.0002; c: odds ratio, 185.0; 95% CI, 15.4 – 8468.0; P ⫽ 0.0007.
`
`myelosuppression with gastrointestinal toxicity. Pemetrexed
`was no exception to this rule. Although infrequent, a combi-
`nation of such toxicities can actually carry a high risk of
`mortality. The inability to control these toxicities has led to
`the discontinuation of clinical development of some anti-
`folates.
`The dependence of therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of
`antifolates such as lometrexol on dietary folic acid intake,
`observed early in the 1990s both in animal models and in
`patients, together with the observation that folic acid was
`not acting by enhancing plasma clearance of these com-
`pounds, had left researchers unable to pin down the
`mechanism responsible for the observed reduction in tox-
`icity. Our work provides the missing link. Using statistical
`approaches, we have uncovered the importance of base-
`line tHcy and MMA as biomarkers for predicting severe
`hematological or nonhematological
`toxicity associated
`with pemetrexed therapy. The statistical investigation re-
`vealed that independent, and/or simultaneous, elevations
`in pretreatment tHcy and MMA levels are more closely
`associated with increased risk of toxicity from pemetrexed
`than from other routine biochemical, hematological, or
`clinical parameters. It also showed that in the absence of
`MMA levels,
`tHcy predicts those toxicities otherwise
`linked to MMA. Because tHcy is a surrogate marker for
`functional folate, with an increase in tHcy concentration
`indicating folate and/or vitamin B12 deficiency, it might be
`expected that treatment with pemetrexed would increase
`plasma tHcy level. However, the folate product of the
`methionine synthase reaction is tetrahydrofolate, which is
`
`converted to 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate and then to
`5-methyltetrahydrofolate (the substrate for methionine
`synthase) by the enzymes serine-hydroxymethyl transfer-
`ase and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase,
`re-
`spectively (29 –30). Because there are currently no data to
`suggest that either of these enzymes is inhibited by peme-
`trexed, one can hypothesize that this cycle will continue
`even in the presence of pemetrexed. Indeed, tHcy levels
`were not increased by pemetrexed therapy in the patients
`studied here.
`MMA elevation (a marker for vitamin B12 deficiency) was
`found to be the most significant predictor of severe diarrhea
`and mucositis. Vitamin B12 deficiency is usually attributable
`to malabsorption of the vitamin, which suggests that gastro-
`intestinal pathology is present in the majority of patients
`experiencing B12 deficiency (31). These patients, may, there-
`fore, experience greater toxicity from antifolates, agents with
`known gastrointestinal side effects.
`Simultaneous elevations in both tHcy and MMA with con-
`centrations above the respective third quartiles resulted in a
`striking increase in the prevalence of severe hematological or
`nonhematological toxicity. As such, the relative risk of an
`individual patient with values in these quartiles developing
`severe toxicity during treatment with pemetrexed was dra-
`matically increased. Although the confidence interval for this
`observation is quite large because of the small number of
`patients involved (n ⫽ 19), the magnitude of the increase in
`risk points to a likely relationship between elevations of both
`markers and a substantial risk of toxicity.
`
`mct.aacrjournals.org
`Downloaded from
` on January 18, 2011
` American Association for Cancer Research
`(cid:160)Copyright © 2002
`
`
`Lilly Ex. 2110
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
`
`551
`
`Despite the high degree of predictability provided by base-
`line tHcy and MMA levels, we were unable to identify all of
`the patients at risk for severe toxicity using these markers.
`This may have been attributable to interindividual differences
`or other untested pharmacological and biological variables
`not characterized in the present study, such as cell mem-
`brane transport, the formation of polyglutamates, or levels of
`the pemetrexed targets thymidylate synthase, DHFR, and
`GARFT/AICARFT.
`Standard medical therapy in response to severe toxicity
`after treatment with antifolate drugs has involved the admin-
`istration of reduced folates (e.g., leucovorin) to rescue pa-
`tients, rather than prophylactically administering folate to
`those who may be at increased risk for toxicity if given
`antifolate therapy. This study has demonstrated that tHcy
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket