throbber
15:25
`
`~- .
`• •
`
`NO. 100
`
`DIVISION OF ONCOLOGY nRUG PRODUCTS
`Center for Drug EvaluatioD and Research, IIFD-ISO
`Parklawn Building
`5600 Fishers Lane, RoclM1le, MD 20857
`
`To:
`
`John WOl2allaf LILLY
`
`From: Alvis Dunson, Project Manager
`
`Fax:
`
`317276-1652
`
`Phone: 317276-5052
`
`Pax:
`
`301-594-0498
`
`P'-- 301-594-5767
`
`Pagea: 2 Oncluding this page)
`
`Date: December 21,1999
`
`Re:
`
`INO 40.0G1/serial nos. 191and 195
`o Urgent ~or Review
`
`0 Pie ••• Comment 0 Pleue Reply
`
`o Please Recycle
`
`TInS DOCUMENT [S INTENDED ONLY FOR TIlE us.e. OF 11-JE PARTY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY
`CONTAIN INFORMATJON mAT 1S PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER
`APPUCABLE LAW. )f you are not the addressee, or a person autl10rized to del iver the document to the addressee, you are hereby
`notified that any review, disclosure, dissemination or other action based on the content of the communication is not authorized. If
`you have received this document in error, please immediately 1lotify uS by telephone and return it to llS at the above address by mail.
`Thank you .
`
`• Co",ments&
`
`Please refer to your submissions dated November 8 and December 3, 1999, for LY231S14 {MTA}.
`
`We have reviewed this submission and have the following comments.
`
`At this point in the review, the Medical Officer does not support adding vitamins to your ongoing
`pivotal, randomized trial in mesothelioma. Thus, the pivotal trial in malignant mesothelioma (H3E(cid:173)
`MC-JMCH) should not be altered at this stage. A few reasons follow.
`
`First, no statistical plan has been submitted to guide how the data is to be evaluated andJor compared
`to the prior accumulated data. Second, at the June 25, 1999, you committed to completing the 280
`patient trial even if the results are positive at the interim analysis; adding vitamins to the trial at this
`time appears to be a deviation from that commitment. Third. the infonnation provided in the Annual
`Report (serial #191) about the toxicities in the trial (pages 45-46) does not appear to support the
`addition of vitamins. You may want to design a randomized trial of MTA +/- vitamins in
`mesothelioma. lfyou believe that vitamin administration will be an important aspect of the MTA
`
`DEC 21 1999 15:08
`
`301 594 0498
`
`PAGE. 01
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`ELAP00013308
`
`TX 1463
`
`Lilly Ex. 2104
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`12/21/99 .
`
`15:25
`
`N
`
`NU.1UU
`
`“U4
`
`IND 40,051
`
`2
`
`December 21 , 1999
`
`i
`
`label, this may be an important trial that can provide convincing evidence with regard to efficacy and
`safety of MTA with and without vitamins.
`Ifyou have any questions please call me at (301) 594-5767.
`
`Thank yo
`
`nflwq
`
`vis unson
`
`DEC 21 1999 15328
`
`321 S94 6498
`
`PFIGE.B2
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`ELAP00013309
`
`Lilly Ex. 2104
`Sandoz V. Lilly IPR20l6-00318
`
`Lilly Ex. 2104
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket