throbber
Am J Hum Genet 37:1-31, 1985
`
`The Natural History of Homocystinura Due to Cystathionine
`jP-Synthase Deficiency
`S. HARVEY MUDD,' FLEMMING SKOVBY,1 HARVEY L. LEVY,2
`KAREN D. PETTIGREW,3 BRIDGET WILCKEN,4 REED E. PYERITZ,5 G. ANDRIA,6
`GODFRIED H. J. BOERS,7 IRVIN L. BROMBERG,8 ROBERTO CERONE,9
`BRIAN FOWLER,'0 H. GROBE,11 HILDGUND SCHMIDT,12 AND LESLIE SCHWEITZER13
`
`SUMMARY
`An international questionnaire survey has been conducted to define better
`the natural history of homocystinuria due to cystathionine P-synthase
`deficiency and permit evaluation of treatment. Data were compiled for
`629 patients. Among patients not discovered by newborn screening, B6-
`responsive individuals on the average have significantly better mental
`capabilities (mean IQ, 79) than do B6-nonresponsive individuals (mean
`IQ, 57). Time-to-event curves are presented for the other major clinical
`abnormalities produced by this disease. Each occurred at significantly
`lower rates in untreated B6-responsive than in untreated B6-nonresponsive
`patients, as shown by the following examples: (1) dislocation of optic
`lenses (at age 10, chances of dislocation: 55% and 82%, respectively);
`(2) initial clinically detected thromboembolic events (at age 15, chances
`
`Received May 29, 1984; revised August 10, 1984.
`1 Laboratory of General and Comparative Biochemistry, National Institute of Mental Health, Bldg.
`32, Rm. 101, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20205.
`2 The Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Laboratories of the Neurology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital,
`and the Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114.
`3 Theoretical Statistics and Mathematics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda,
`MD 20205.
`4N.S.W. Department of Health, Oliver Latham Laboratory, North Ryde 2113, Sydney, Australia.
`5Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
`Baltimore, MD 21205.
`6 Clinica Pediatrica della II Facolta di Medicina e Chirurgia, Napoli, Italy.
`7Department of Medicine, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
`8 The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada.
`9 Clinica Pediatrica R ((G. Gaslini)), Universita di Genova, Genova, Italy.
`10 Willink Biochemical Genetics Unit, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester M27
`IHA, England.
`Kinderklinik der Universitat Mtinster, D-4400 Munster, West Germany.
`12 Kinderklinik der Universitat Heidelberg, D-6900 Heidelberg, West Germany.
`13 New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY
`10314.
`© 1985 by the American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved. 0002-9297/85/3701-0001$02.00
`1
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`2
`
`MUDD ET AL.
`of having had such an event: 12% and 27%, respectively); (3) radiologic
`detection of spinal osteoporosis (at age 15, chances of such osteoporosis
`having been detected: 36% and 64%, respectively); and (4) mortality
`(at age 30, chances of not surviving: 4% and 23%, respectively). Me-
`thionine restriction initiated neonatally prevented mental retardation,
`retarded the rate of lens dislocation, and may have reduced the incidence
`of seizures. Pyridoxine treatment of late-detected B6-responsive patients
`retarded the rate of occurrence of initial thromboembolic events. Fol-
`lowing 586 surgical procedures, 25 postoperative thromboembolic com-
`plications occurred, six of which were fatal. Reproductive histories
`were reported predominately for B6-responsive patients. Living offspring
`of either men or women patients had few abnormalities. The evidence
`is inconclusive whether untreated maternal cystathionine P-synthase
`deficiency leads to excessive fetal loss. Only 13% of patients detected
`in screening programs of newborns and classified as to B6-responsiveness
`were B6-responsive, compared to 47% among late-detected patients.
`Current screening programs that identify neonatal hypermethioninemia
`may be preferentially failing to detect B6-responsive patients.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Homocystinuria due to cystathionine P-synthase deficiency is a genetically de-
`termined inborn error of the transsulfuration pathway biochemically characterized
`by increased plasma homocyst(e)ine and methionine and decreased cyst(e)ine.
`The disease was discovered in 1962, when mentally retarded individuals were
`screened for abnormal urinary amino acids [1, 2]. Two years later, the enzyme
`defect, deficient activity of cystathionine P-synthase, was demonstrated [3]. *
`The major clinical manifestations include mental retardation, dislocation of the
`optic lens (ectopia lentis), skeletal abnormalities, and a tendency to thromboembolic
`episodes [6].
`Once the enzyme defect and the major biochemical aberrations had been defined,
`dietary therapy based upon methionine restriction and L-cystine supplementation
`was suggested. This regimen resulted in some degree of control of the biochemical
`abnormalities, and largely anecdotal evidence emerged that such treatment from
`the newborn period could prevent or delay clinical manifestations [7-10]. Sub-
`sequently, it was found that some patients on normal diets respond biochemically
`to large doses of vitamin B6t with decreases in plasma homocyst(e)ine and changes
`of plasma methionine and cyst(e)ine concentrations toward normal [11], while
`others do not so respond. Evidence now available strongly indicates that such
`
`* Several other enzyme lesions are now known that also lead to excretion of excess homocystine
`(homocystinuria) [4, 5]. In this paper, we will deal only with homocystinuria due to cystathionine
`,B-synthase deficiency, and the condition will be designated by the latter name.
`t Vitamin B6 will hereafter be referred to as B6 or pyridoxine.
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`HOMOCYSTINURIA
`
`3
`
`B6-responsiveness, or lack thereof, is one manifestation of a considerable hetero-
`geneity in the mutations producing deficiencies of cystathionine P-synthase activity
`[6]. Since 1967, many patients have been given trials or prolonged periods of
`dietary and/or pyridoxine therapy. These therapeutic trials were carried out in
`the absence of any randomly selected, untreated control population. More recently,
`the use of aspirin and dipyridamol has been suggested to prevent thrombosis
`[12], but neither has been subjected to rigorous testing. Other workers have
`advocated the administration of betaine to reduce concentrations of homocysteine
`[13, 14].
`Only a few years elapsed between discovery of cystathionine P-synthase de-
`ficiency and initiation of various therapies. Consequently, there was little op-
`portunity to accumulate knowledge about the natural history of the condition. It
`is clear, however, that the age of onset and the severity of clinical manifestations
`vary widely among affected individuals. Thus, the prevalence and natural history
`of each of the pleiotropic features remain uncertain. Few data are available upon
`the impact of maternal cystathionine P-synthase deficiency on reproductive potential
`and on the fetus. The effects of genetic heterogeneity, as indicated, for example,
`by B6-responsiveness or B6-nonresponsiveness, on each of these manifestations
`are largely undefined. These gaps in our knowledge impede realistic assessment
`of the efficacy of various therapies. Since homocystinuria due to cystathionine
`P-synthase deficiency is a relatively rare disease [6], no single physician or center
`has accumulated a sufficiently large sample of patients to address these questions.
`Therefore, we have conducted a worldwide questionnaire survey and collected
`information in a standardized format on more than 600 patients with homocystinuria
`due to proven or presumed deficiency of cystathionine
`3-synthase. Our results,
`presented in this report, clarify some of the major uncertainties about the natural
`history of the disease and the role of genetic heterogeneity. They also establish
`baselines for future evaluation of the effects of treatment in this disease.
`
`METHODS
`
`Data Base
`A standardized questionnaire was designed and mailed to each clinician known from a
`previous study [15] to be caring for patients with cystathionine 0-synthase deficiency.
`Physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire for each such individual about whom
`they had appropriate information. To encourage participation, the questionnaire was kept
`relatively simple.* Each patient was identified by first name, first two letters of family
`name, birth date, and sex. Affected relatives were specified. Further questions focused
`upon the factor(s) that led to ascertainment, whether the patient was responsive to B6,
`and upon the presence and age of appearance of major clinical manifestations. A detailed
`history of therapy was requested, as well as a reproductive history. To permit use of rel-
`evant published material, the respondent was asked to identify articles concerning a given
`patient. Additional sources of information were identified by a review of the literature
`and by contacting centers around the world specializing in diagnosis and management of
`inborn errors of metabolism. Further, physician cooperation was solicited by notices in
`
`* Copies of the questionnaire are available through the National Auxiliary Publications Service
`(see footnote t to page 10).
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`4
`
`MUDD ET AL.
`
`appropriate journals. For some patients upon whom recent information could not be obtained,
`the study coordinators completed questionnaires chiefly or solely on the basis of published
`material. Such patients were included only when sufficient details were available to prove
`that they did not overlap with any patient otherwise included in the study. Data collection
`occurred during 1982 and early 1983. Data from the completed questionnaires were entered
`into a computer and verified by proofreading a print-out of the computer data against the
`original questionnaires. A computer search for duplication due to a single patient having
`been reported upon by two different physicians detected several such instances, and the
`redundant information was deleted.
`
`Statistical Analyses
`
`Time-to-event curves were calculated according to the product-limit estimate method
`of Kaplan and Meier [16]. Comparisons among the curves for statistically significant
`differences were performed by the procedures of Gehan [ 17] and Breslow [ 18]. For evaluation
`of treatments, numbers of expected events were calculated according to the nonparametric
`procedures described by Turnbull et al. [19]. Differences between numbers of observed
`and expected events were tested for statistical significance according to the same procedure.
`
`RESULTS
`The Study Population and Criteria for Acceptance into Study
`For the present survey, updated information was received concerning 532
`homocystinuric patients with proven or presumed cystathionine P-synthase de-
`ficiency. To this group was added material on an additional 97 patients obtained
`primarily from published reports [7, 9, 20-55], bringing the total to 629 patients.
`All patients admitted to the study had been demonstrated to be excreting homo-
`cystine. To restrict the population to cystathionine P-synthase-deficient individuals
`(thus excluding other causes of homocystine excretion [4-6]), either (1) cysta-
`thionine P3-synthase deficiency had to have been demonstrated directly by enzyme
`assay or (2) the patient had to have either hypermethioninemia or dislocated optic
`lenses. Table 1 shows the similar percent distributions of these findings in patients
`with and without confirmation of the diagnosis by enzyme assay.
`
`TABLE 1
`CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PATIENTS INTO STUDY
`
`ENZYME ASSAY
`Not performed
`Performed*
`
`............ 147 (68.0%)
`Dislocated lens and hypermethioninemia ......
`21 (9.7%)
`Dislocated lens only .............
`.......................
`Hypermethioninemia only ..........
`39 (18.1%)
`.....................
`9 (4.2%)
`Neither of above ................
`.......................
`216 (100%)
`Total ...............................................
`
`274 (66.3%)
`75 (18.2%)
`64 (15.5%)
`0 (0%)
`413 (100%)
`
`* The following tissues were used for enzyme assays (followed by no. patients, in parentheses): liver (27);
`both liver and cultured fibroblasts (13); cultured fibroblasts (170); brain (1); phytohemagglutinin-stimulated
`lymphocytes (3); transformed lymphocytes (1); cultured fibroblasts and phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lym-
`phocytes (1).
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`HOMOCYSTINURIA
`
`5
`
`TABLE 2
`CLINICAL FEATURES LEADING TO INVESTIGATION FOR HOMOCYSTINURIA
`
`Clinical feature
`
`Ectopia lentis
`.......................
`Mental retardation .4.0
`Developmental retardation .1.5
`Early thromboembolic disorder .1.1
`.0.9
`Marfanoid characteristics
`Bony abnormality
`.0.2
`Seizures .0.2
`Behavioral or psychiatric disorder
`Othert .0.4
`
`Sole cause
`(% of patients)
`
`20.6
`
`0
`
`Contributory
`cause*
`(% of patients)
`
`Total in
`which a cause
`(% of patients)
`
`65.0
`51.7
`21.0
`15.0
`36.0
`23.3
`3.0
`2.8
`10.6
`
`85.6
`55.7
`22.5
`16.1
`36.9
`23.5
`3.2
`2.8
`11.0
`
`NOTE: Based on data for 472 patients not ascertained as a result of screening of newborns or screening of all
`sibs of a proband.
`* Includes all patients with the specified feature, as well as at least one other, reported as leading to investigation
`for homocystinuria.
`t Includes a variety of manifestations, none of which was a cause in as many as 2% of the population.
`
`Of the 629 patients, 307 were females and 321 males, close to the expected
`ratio of 1:1. The sex of one patient was not specified. Sixty-four patients (10.2%)
`were dead at the time of reporting.
`
`Ascertainment
`Data on factors leading to investigation of patients for homocystinuria were
`available for 618 patients. Of these, 58 were discovered during screening of
`newborns, and an additional 88 were discovered by screening all siblings after
`detection of homocystinuria in a proband, leaving 472 patients ascertained on
`the basis of clinical features. Table 2 displays the frequencies at which each of
`the major clinical manifestations was the sole reported cause of investigation for
`homocystinuria or was a contributory cause. Most patients were investigated
`because of more than one clinical feature, the major exception being the almost
`21% initially investigated solely because of ectopia lentis.
`
`B6-Responsiveness
`Of the 629 patients, 231 (36.7%) were classified as biochemically responsive
`to B6 when not folate depleted; 231 (36.7%) were classified as nonresponsive to
`B6; 67 (10.7%) were judged intermediate in response; and 100 (15.9%) had not
`been classified. For subsequent analyses in this presentation, neither the "inter-
`mediate-response" group, although this may include patients with a biochemically
`significant response, nor unclassified patients were included in groups designated
`as "B6-responsive" or "B6-nonresponsive."
`The relative frequencies of B6-responsive and B6-nonresponsive patients among
`at least two subgroups of the total population differed markedly from the overall
`frequency. Among the 55 patients who had been both discovered by newborn
`screening and classified with respect to B6-responsiveness, seven (12.7%) were
`B6-responsive, 43 (78.2%) were nonresponsive, and five (9.1%) were intermediate
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`MUDD ET AL.
`6
`in response. Thus, the ratio of responders to nonresponders was 1:6 in this subgroup.
`Among 25 patients who were not hypermethioninemic when untreated and who
`had been classified with respect to B6-responsiveness, 21 (84%) were responsive,
`two (8%) were nonresponsive, and two (8%) were intermediate in response,
`yielding a ratio of responders to nonresponders of 10:1.
`For many sibships, more than one affected member had been classified as to
`B6-responsiveness. Table 3 shows that among such sibs there was almost complete
`concordance of responsiveness or nonresponsiveness. In no case was a patient
`judged fully responsive when one of his or her sibs was judged fully nonresponsive.
`
`Hypermethioninemia
`Among the patients for whom data were available concerning the presence or
`absence of hypermethioninemia in the untreated state, 524 (93.6%) were hyper-
`methioninemic and 36 (6.4%) were not. As expected from the relative prepon-
`derance of B6-responsive patients among those who were not hypermethioninemic,
`10% of untreated B6-responders were not hypermethioninemic, whereas less than
`1% of untreated B6-nonresponders were not hypermethioninemic.
`
`Mental Capabilities
`Responding physicians were asked to rate the mental capabilities of patients
`in several ways:
`(1) IQ. A plot of the distribution of IQ's among all patients for whom such
`data were available is shown in figure 1. To eliminate any effect of very early
`therapy, data on patients discovered by newborn screening were not used in
`constructing these plots of IQ or in the alternative analyses of mental capabilities
`discussed in the following sections. Figure 1 demonstrates a very wide range in
`patient IQ's-from 10 to 138. The median of the cumulative frequency curve
`was at an IQ of approximately 64. The curve for patients classified as B6-responders
`was shifted toward higher IQ's (median 78), whereas that for patients classified
`as B6-nonresponders was shifted toward lower IQ's (median 56). As a result,
`only about 4% of B6-nonresponders had IQ's of 90 or above, but 22% of B6-
`responders had values in this range. The difference between the mean IQ for B6-
`
`TABLE 3
`CONCORDANCE OF B6--RESPONSIVENESS IN SIBLINGS
`
`ADDITIONAL SIBS:
`B6-RESPONSIVENESS
`
`FIRST SIB: B6-RESPONSIVENESS
`Int. *
`Yes
`No
`
`56
`
`Yes .
`Int.* ..1
`No ...................
`M.
`57
`
`...
`10
`...
`10
`
`...
`
`2
`50
`52
`
`y
`
`56
`13
`50
`119
`
`NOTE: Based upon 104 sibships (total of 223 sibs) in which more than one
`sib had been classified with respect to B6-responsiveness.
`* Int. = intermediate.
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`HOMOCYSTINURIA
`
`7
`
`o80
`
`20
`
`80
`80
`20
`40
`CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY
`OF PATIENTS, percent
`FIG. 1.-Distributions of IQ's among patients not detected by newborn screening. The curves are
`based on the following nos. of patients with reported IQ's: all B6 categories, 284; B6-responders,
`107; B6-nonresponders, 115. For any specified IQ value, the plots show the total percent of each
`category of patients with IQ's equal to, or less than, the specified value.
`
`100
`
`responders (79) and that for nonresponders (57) was highly significant (P S
`.0001).
`(2) If no IQ value was available, physicians rated the patients as being either
`"grossly retarded," "mildly retarded," 'average or above average intelligence,
`but with a learning disability," or "average or above average intelligence." Table
`4 shows the proportions of patients in each of these categories. The trends are
`clearly the same as those resulting from IQ measurements, with 61 % of the
`patients being either grossly or mildly retarded, but only 38% of B6-responders
`being so rated, and almost 85% of B6-nonresponders showing retardation. The
`difference between the distributions of B6-responders and nonresponders was
`again highly significant (P -
`.0001).
`(3) If a proband had one or more documented nonhomocystinuric sibs, responding
`physicians were asked to rate the proband's intelligence as either "below," the
`"same" as, or "above" that of unaffected sibs. The results, table 4, follow a
`.0001) higher ratings for B6-
`similar trend, again with very significantly (P -
`responders than for B6-nonresponders.
`To evaluate further the validity of the results described above, for each rating
`method, the analyses were repeated after prior division of the patients into subgroups
`consisting of those with a diagnosis confirmed by enzyme assay and those without
`such confirmation. No substantial differences were noted between these two
`subgroups.
`To gain some insight into the influence of ascertainment bias on the ratings of
`mental capabilities, the above analyses were repeated (1) after removal of the
`few patients ascertained solely on the basis of mental retardation and (2) after
`removal of all patients with mental retardation included as one factor in ascer-
`tainment. The first procedure produced virtually no change; the second led, as
`expected, to shifts toward higher IQ's among all groups. The medians of the
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`8
`
`~~~~~MUDDET AL.
`
`>
`0
`
`o.
`
`Cu~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1
`4)~~~
`~~Cu
`.0
`
`W LL.
`0<
`
`Cu3
`2
`
`C1
`
`F
`
`u 0
`'z
`
`0
`
`.0
`
`04) cn W
`
`C>
`Q~
`.0
`
`c
`0 c
`
`U
`
`00
`~~~~~~~~~~0
`
`w 0~~~
`
`r- e1-
`
`<
`
`F>
`
`Cu3
`
`C's
`
`00
`
`r
`
`40
`
`~~~~~~~~~CO00
`00
`
`4
`
`00
`
`0~~~~~~~0C
`
`C40
`
`Cu
`
`0
`
`4)Cu0
`Cu~~0Cu ~~Cu
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`HOMOCYSTINURIA
`
`9
`
`A
`A
`
`8
`
`A
`
`0
`
`0
`
`00
`A
`AA
`AA
`80
`A
`A
`A A 0AO
`A A
`1A
`A0A
`a 0-A AA4
`A
`A 80 AA A
`A4LA -A&
`A A A
`
`A
`
`20
`
`A
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Pan
`
`aA
`A
`
`A
`A
`Panel A
`
`0
`
`A
`
`100
`
`8
`
`O
`
`so8
`
`20 -A
`
`80
`
`4
`Ao
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`24
`
`000 0
`0
`A
`A
`AA
`0
`68A A A
`-A
`0
`
`A
`
`A
`hA
`
`A~AA
`
`A
`
`A
`
`A
`
`0
`
`AA
`
`A A
`A
`A yA
`A A
`
`Panel B
`
`10
`
`12
`
`8L
`
`AGE, years
`FIG. 2.-Effect of early treatment on IQ of B6-nonresponsive patients. B6-nonresponsive patients
`ascertained by newborn screening and treated with methionine restriction from early ages are each
`represented by an open circle. The same patients are plotted in both panels A and B. The ages are
`those at which the IQ's were measured. The comparison populations consist of B6-nonresponsive
`patients not ascertained by newborn screening. Each such patient is represented by a closed triangle.
`For comparison populations, the ages are: panel A, age at ascertainment; panel B, age at last follow-
`up. The lines are regression lines calculated for the IQ's of the comparison populations: panel A,
`IQ = 57.27 - (0.01567) x (age at ascertainment, in mos); mean IQ = 55.7 ± 2.6 (SEM); panel
`B, IQ = 58.81 - (0.01827) x (age at last follow-up, in mos); mean IQ = 57.6 ± 1.9 (SEM).
`
`cumulative IQ curves rose to 81 for patients in all B6 categories combined, to 86
`for B6-responders, and to 64 for B6-nonresponders. Thus, the difference in median
`IQ between B6-responders and nonresponders was essentially unchanged (about
`22 points), and the difference in mean IQ remained highly significant (P S
`.0001). Similar shifts occurred in the more qualitative alternative estimates of
`mental capabilities, and again the differences between B6-responders and non-
`responders remained highly significant (data not shown).
`General experience with cys-
`Effect of early treatment on mental capability.
`tathionine P-synthase-deficient patients has shown that late treatment rarely, if
`ever, completely reverses mental impairment [6], although methionine restriction
`or treatment with pyridoxine [56, 57] or betaine [13] have been reported to lead
`to behavioral improvement and moderate increases in IQ [57], suggesting a re-
`versible component to the mental disturbance of the untreated disease [57]. Early
`treatment, however, might prevent the mental damage [10]. The effect of early
`treatment is illustrated in figure 2. IQ's for B6-nonresponsive patients identified
`as neonates and treated from very early ages with methionine restriction, usually
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`10
`
`MUDD ET AL.
`accompanied by L-cystine supplementation (early-treated), are compared to IQ's
`of B6-nonresponsive patients not detected by newborn screening (late-detected).
`If treated at all, very few of the latter patients had commenced therapy at ages
`of less than 1-2 years. IQ's of early-treated patients are plotted at the age of
`measurement of the latest reported IQ. The ages of measurement of the IQ's for
`the late-detected patients were not specified in the questionnaire. These IQ's are
`plotted alternatively as a function of the age at ascertainment (panel A) or the
`age at last follow-up (panel B). It is apparent that for these late-detected patients
`severe impairment of IQ was manifest from early ages, and this impairment did
`not change markedly as a function of age. * The IQ's of the early-treated patients
`are higher, with little overlap with the late-detected groups at ages up to 7 to 8
`(mean IQ = 94 ± 4 [SEM]; P < .001 compared to mean IQ of either late-
`detected group).
`Qualitative estimates of mental capabilities for the early-treated group are in
`agreement with the above results. Of 23 patients without IQ measurements, one
`(4%) was estimated to be grossly retarded, three (13%) mildly retarded, one (4%)
`average with learning disability, and 18 (78%) to be average or above. These
`values are very favorable compared to those in table 4 for late-detected B6-
`nonresponsive patients.
`For the 15 patients detected by newborn screening who were B6-responsive,
`or were intermediate or unclassified as to B6 response, reported IQ's ranged from
`82-110 (six patients), and all other patients were estimated to be of "average or
`above average" intelligence. Most of these patients had been treated with me-
`thionine restriction from the time of diagnosis, several had received B6 in addition,
`and four (three responders, one intermediate) had been treated solely with vitamin
`B6. Again, these results are highly favorable compared to those in table 4.
`Dislocation of Optic Lenses
`Data on ages of lens dislocation were analyzed according to the Kaplan and
`Meier method, with the important stipulation that for each patient the only interval
`considered was that prior to initiation of treatment specific for cystathionine 1-
`synthase deficiency. Hence, a patient was removed from the group at risk for
`lens dislocation (censored) at the time he or she started such treatment. The result-
`ing time-to-event graphs are shown in figure 3.t These plots demonstrate that,
`
`* The apparent tendency of IQ in the early-detected group to decrease after age 8 may to some
`extent be due to a change in the method used to determine IQ. Prior to age 6, methods that measure
`only verbal ability (e.g., Stanford-Binet) are generally used; thereafter, methods that evaluate per-
`formance as well as verbal ability (e.g., WISC) are used increasingly. Some patients we have observed
`received a markedly higher "verbal" than "performance" score on the WISC test and, correspondingly,
`had lower overall IQ scores at ages when this test was used than at a younger age. The questionnaire
`did not ask the responding physician to specify the type ofIQ test used, and further data would be
`needed to evaluate fully the effects of this possible methodological change.
`t The numerical values upon which this figure is based have been deposited with, and are available
`through, the National Auxiliary Publications Service. See NAPS document no. 04244 for 17 pages
`of supplementary material. Order from NAPSc/o Microfiche Publications, P.O. Box 3513, Grand
`Central Station, New York, NY 10163. Remit in advance in U.S. funds only $7.75 for photocopies
`or $4.00 for microfiche. Outside the U.S. and Canada, add postage of $4.50. $1.50 for microfiche
`postage.
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`HOMOCYSTINURIA
`
`11
`
`a
`
`F
`4 4
`U)
`
`50
`
`-
`
`< y ills ark
`
`B6 - non-respons*ve
`o~~~~~~~ANtyrm combined
`
`0 30-
`
`z U
`
`Ui20-
`U).1zLU
`
`14-
`
`10
`
`7-
`
`5-
`
`3
`
`0c
`
`c
`0L
`
`zL
`
`U
`cc
`LU0.
`
`4
`
`8
`
`12
`
`16
`
`24
`
`28
`
`32
`
`36
`
`40
`
`20
`AGE, Years
`FIG. 3.-Time-to-event graphs for lens dislocation in untreated patients. Patients were removed
`from the at-risk groups upon commencement of any therapy. Probabilities were calculated according
`to the Kaplan and Meier method [16] and are plotted on a logarithmic scale. Time points are plotted
`only when they are the first or last for a given probability. Based on data for following nos. of
`patients: B6-responsive, 231; B6-nonresponsive 231; all types, 628. Each plot is discontinued at the
`time the no. of patients remaining at risk decreases to 10. For clarity, the graph for "all patients"
`is plotted starting at age 4.
`
`for all groups of patients, there was a lag period of approximately 2 years before
`appreciable lens dislocation occurred. After age 2, lens dislocations began to be
`detected, but at different rates in B6-nonresponders and B6-responders, so that
`50% of untreated nonresponsive patients had dislocated lenses by age 6, whereas
`for untreated B6-responsive patients, 50% dislocation was attained at approximately
`age 10. After age 3, smoothed logarithmic plots are reasonable approximations
`of straight lines for both groups. Thus, during this phase, approximately half of
`the B6-nonresponsive patients who start an interval with intact lenses can be
`expected to dislocate during the next 40 months, while for untreated B6-responders,
`half can be expected to dislocate each 95-100 months. Statistically, the difference
`between the time-to-event graphs for B6-responders and B6-nonresponders was
`highly significant (P < .0001). Note, however, that these plots most correctly
`represent the detection of lens dislocation rather than its actual occurrence. If a
`patient had dislocated lenses at ascertainment, and his or her history did not
`establish a prior time of dislocation, then dislocation was placed at the time of
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`12
`
`MUDD ET AL.
`ascertainment. As a result, these curves represent maximum ages. Serial exam-
`inations of untreated patients from early ages might well result in curves shifted
`to earlier ages in such plots.
`Effect of treatment on lens dislocation. An important property of the Kaplan-
`Meier curves shown in figure 3 is that they furnish a statistical prognosis for an
`untreated patient starting at any specified age. This permits assessment of the
`effect of treatment on lens dislocation in an assorted group of patients who start
`treatment at different ages and have been maintained on treatment for different
`intervals. For each such patient, one can calculate the probability that, during
`the interval he or she is at risk on treatment, lens dislocation would have occurred
`had he or she not been treated.* The combined probabilities for a group of such
`patients yield a predicted number of dislocations if they had been untreated or if
`treatment is without effect. This number can be compared to the actual number
`of dislocations that occurred during treatment. Table 5 displays such comparisons.
`Among 24 B6-responsive patients with lenses intact who were given pyridoxine
`(with or without folate) as initial and continuous treatment (column A), 8.4
`dislocations would have been expected to occur during treatment, as calculated
`from the time-to-event graph (fig. 3) if treatment had no effect. Five dislocations
`occurred. This decrease is not statistically significant (P > .05). Column C takes
`into account additional experience by including intervals of treatment that took
`place after temporary interruption of the initial treatment or in which B6 therapy
`followed earlier periods of dietary treatment. The decrease in the number of lens
`dislocations observed below those expected now became statistically significant.
`In table 5, B6-nonresponsive patients are separated into "late-detected" and
`"early-treated" (i.e., those identified by newborn screening). No effect of therapy
`was observed among the few "late-detected" B6-nonresponsive patients who had
`intact lenses at the time they were started on dietary therapy. Among "early-
`treated"patients, however, for each treatment regimen evaluated, the number of
`dislocations observed was significantly below the number expected (P c
`.001),
`suggesting that therapy may be beneficial when begun in early infancy. Since six
`of these patients had suffered lens dislocations, the benefit may be more in delaying
`the time of lens dislocation rather than in absolute prevention. Follow-up of these
`patients to older ages is necessary to clarify this issue.
`
`Thromboembolic Events
`From the thromboembolic events originally reported, nine described as "pos-
`sible" or "partial" and two that were only questionably related to the underlying
`condition were deleted. There remained a total of 253 events, occurring in 158
`patients. No reported events occurred in 471 patients. Of these 253 events, 81
`(32%) were cerebrovascular accidents, 130 (51 %) affected peripheral veins (with
`
`* The interval at risk is the time from onset of treatment in a patient with lenses not yet dislocated
`until the earliest of one of three events: (1) treatment termination, (2) time of last follow-up (if the
`patient is on continuing treatment), or (3) lens dislocation. The probability that an untreated patient
`will develop dislocation during the interval tl to t2 is (1 -P2/Pi), where pi and P2 are the probabilities
`that lenses are not dislocated (fig. 3) at times tj and t2, respectively.
`
`Lilly Ex. 2096
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`HOMOCYSTINURIA
`
`13
`
`C
`
`>
`
`0
`
`C
`
`cq
`
`r-
`
`i.>
`
`4)
`>
`?
`0
`
`C
`
`C
`
`.0
`
`C
`
`=
`
`> C,3
`
`>0
`
`O'o
`
`C
`0
`
`C0
`
`O 2
`
`C0
`
`C
`
`0 0
`a :3 0
`r
`lo.,z
`C
`0
`Q 0 0
`C
`
`0
`
`C > IC S.
`
`- m
`
`Cd
`
`C
`V
`0 -,=

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket