throbber
Cancer Chemotherapy
`and Biotherapy:
`Principles anCf Practice
`SECOND EDITION
`
`EDITED BY
`
`Bruce A. Chabner, M.D.
`
`Chief, Hematology /Oncology
`Clinical Director
`Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
`Boston, Massachusetts
`
`Dan L. Longo, M.D.
`
`Director, Biological Response Modifiers Program
`Division of Cancer Treatment
`National Cancer Institute
`Frederick, Maryland
`
`Lippincott - Raven
`
`PUBL I S HER S
`
`Philadelphia • New York
`
`Lilly Ex. 2054
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`Copyright© 1996 by Lippincott-Raven Publishers. All rights reserved. This book is protected by copy(cid:173)
`right. No part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transn;itted, in any form or by
`any means-electronic, mechanical , photocopy, recording, or otherwise-without the pnor wntten
`permission of the publisher, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Printed
`in the United States of America. For information write Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 227 East Wash(cid:173)
`ington Square, Philadelphia, PA 19106.
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publications Data
`
`Cancer chemotherapy and biotherapy : principles and practice / edited
`by Bruce A. Chabner, Dan L. Longo- 2nd ed.
`p. em.
`Rev. ed. of: Cancer chemotherapy.
`Includes bibliographical references and index .
`ISBN 0-397-51418-2 (hard: alk. paper)
`1. Cancer-Chemotherapy. 2. Cancer-Immunotherapy.
`(Dan Louis), 1949-
`II. Cancer chemotherapy.
`[DNLM: l. Neoplasms-drug therapy. 2. Biological Products-therapeutic use.
`3 . Antineoplastic Agents-therapeutic use. 4. Chabner, Bruce. QZ 267 C2 1515 1996]
`RC27l.C5C32219 1996
`616.99'4061-dc20
`DNLM/DLC
`for Library of Congress
`
`I. Longo, Dan L
`
`95 -38920
`C IP
`
`The material contained in this volume was submitted as previously unpublished material, except in
`the instances in which credit has been given to the source from which some of the illustrative material
`was derived.
`Great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of the information contained in the volume. How(cid:173)
`ever, neither Lippincott- Raven Publishers nor the editors can be held responsible for errors or for any
`consequences arising from the use of the information herein.
`The authors and publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth
`in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. How(cid:173)
`ever, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the co nstant flow of infor(cid:173)
`mation relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for
`each drug for any change in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is
`particularly important when the recommended agent is a new or infi-equcntly employed drug.
`Materials appearing in this book prepared by individuals as part of tl1eir official duties as U.S.
`Government employees are not covered by the above-mentioned copyright.
`
`9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
`
`Lilly Ex. 2054
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`Ca~tct:?' Cht:?notbt:rnp_l' a~td Biotht:rnp)'J sam1d aiitiou}
`edited by Bruce A. Chobncr ond Don L. Longo.
`Lippincott- Raven Publishers, Philadelphia © 1996
`
`CHAPTER
`
`'--
`
`Antifolates
`Edward Chu and Carmen J. Allegra
`
`donates its one-carbon group to tl1e reductive methylation
`reactio n converting deoxyuridylate (dUMP) to thymidy(cid:173)
`late (dTMP) (see Fig. 6-1). In addition to yielding a one(cid:173)
`carbon group, 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate is oxidized
`to dihydrofolate, vvhich must then be red uced to tetra(cid:173)
`hydrofolate by the enzyme DHFR in order for it to rejoin
`the pool of active reduced folate cofactors. In actively pro(cid:173)
`liferating tumor cells, inhibition of DHFR by methotrex(cid:173)
`ate (MTX) (see Fig. 6-2) or other 2 ,4 -diamino folates may
`lead to an accumulation of tolates in the inactive dihydro(cid:173)
`folate form, witl1 variable depletion of reduced folates. 8- 1•
`Folate depletion, however, does not fi.11ly account for the
`metabolic inhibition associated with antifolate treatment,
`since the critical reduced folate pools are relatively pre(cid:173)
`served even in the presence of cytotoxic concentrations of
`MTX. Add itional factors may contribute to MTX-associ(cid:173)
`ated cytotoxicity, including metabolism of the parent
`compound to polyglutamated derivatives and tl1e accumu(cid:173)
`lation of dihydrotolate and 10-formyld.ihydrofolate poly(cid:173)
`glutamates as a consequence of DHFR i~1hibition 8•9• 1 5- 1 7
`MTX polyglutamates, dihydrofolate polyglutamates, and
`10-formyldihydrofolate metabolites represent potent direct
`inhibitors of tl1e folate-dependent enzymes of thymidylate
`and purine biosynthesis. 18- 23 Thus inhibition of DNA
`biosyntl1esis by 2,4-diamino folates is a multifactorial
`process consisting of botl1 partial depletion of reduced
`folate substrates and direct inhibition of folate-dependent
`enzymes. The relative role of each of these mechanisms in
`determining antifolate-associated metabolic inhibition may
`depend on specific cellular factors tl1at vary among difterent
`cancer cell lines and tumors.
`
`CHEMICAL STRUCTURE
`
`Various heterocyclic compou nds with the 2,4-diamino
`structural configuration have antifolate activity and include
`such as pyrimethamine and
`pyrimidine analogues
`trimethoprim20- 29 (see Fig. 6-2 ), classic pteridines such
`as aminopterin and methotrexate/ and compounds
`with replacement of the nitrogen at either the 5
`8, or 10 position witl1 a carbon atom, such as tl1e quina~
`
`109
`
`The folate -dependent enzymes represent attractive tar(cid:173)
`gets .for antitumor chemotherapy because of their critical
`role 1n the synthesis of the nucl eotide precursors of DNA
`(Fig. 6-1 ). In 1948, Farber et al. 1 were the first to show
`that aminopterin, a 4-amino acid analogue of folic acid,
`could 1nhibit the proliferation of leukemic cells and pro(cid:173)
`duce remissions in acute leukemia. Their findings ushered
`1n the era of antimetabolite chemotherapy and generated
`great interest in the antifolate class of agents. Si nce then,
`the r .
`b
`c H11cal value of antifolate compounds has
`een
`roven in the treatment of the leukemias, breast cancer,
`I


`lead
`d
`d
`'
`an
`neck cancer, lympho mas, an
`c 10nocaro-
`110111a2 Their clinical application also has been extended
`~~ the treatment of nonneoplastic disorders, including
`~ leu~natoid arthritis,3 graft-versus-host .disease following
`one marrow transplantation, 4 psonasis, 5 bactenal and
`P.lasmodial infections 6 and opportunistic infections asso-
`Ciated
`. h
`' .
`.
`d fi .
`d .
`(
`W1t
`the acqmred Immuno e c1ency syn 1 ome
`bAIDS) _7 It is fair to state that this class of agents is the
`lest understood and most versatile of all the cancer
`C1enlotherapeutic drugs (Table 6-1 ).
`
`P 1
`
`
`
`MECHANISM OF ACTION
`
`1


`Substit
`_
`. ~It1on of an amino group for the hydroxy at tl1e
`4
`position of the pteridine ring is the critical change in
`h

`l
`t e str
`d
`. ucture of antifolate compounds tl1at lea s to t 1e1r
`~ntltumor activity (Fig. 6-2). This change transforms the
`~1~lecu]~ fi·om a substrate to a tight-binding inhibitor of
`~111Ydrotolate reductase (DHFR), a key enzyme in intra-
`I .
`. .
`ce ular c I
`f.
`•o ate homeostasis. The cnt1ca
`Importance o
`b}{ '
`a . FR stems from the fact that folic acid compounds are
`I d
`Ct:Jve as ·


`' coenzymes only m their fully reduced teu·a 1y ro-
`f,
`1
`P~aat~ f~rm. There are two specific te~·ahydrofolates that
`. Y ssenual roles as one-carbon earners mvolved 111 the
`synthes·
`f

`. 15 o DNA precursors. 10-Formylteu·ahydrofolate
`.
`10Vldes it ·
`P

`tl
`f
`.
`s one-carbon group for tl1e de novo syn 1es1s o
`P
`unnes in
`·d
`·b




`.
`nu
`1eacuons mediated by glycmeam1 e n o-
`1
`bo ~eo tide (GAR) ti·ansformylase and aminoimidazole car(cid:173)
`on~amide ribonucleotide (AI CAR) transformylase. A sec-
`cofactor, 5, 10-metl1ylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2FHo~),
`
`Lilly Ex. 2054
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`110
`
`CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND BIOTHERAPY
`
`Figure 6· 1. Sites of action of MTX, its polyglutamated metabolites [MTX(Giun)], and folate by-products of the inhibition of DHFR, in·
`eluding dihydrofolate (FH2) and 1 0-formyldihydrofolate ( 1 O-CHO·FH2). Also shown are 5,1 O·methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2·FH.),
`the folate cofactor required for thymidylate synthesis, and 1 0-formyltetrahydrofolate ( 1 O·CHO·FH4), the required intermediate in the
`synthesis of purine precursors. (From Chabner eta\. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer principles and practice of
`oncology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1989:349.)
`
`5-CHO -FH 4
`(Leucovorin)
`
`dUMP
`
`\
`
`dTMP
`
`,Reductase
`
`' '
`.......... ' ..... ~
`
`......-;:;_--!_.~ 10-CHO-FH2
`
`Compound
`
`Inhibits
`
`MTX
`
`Dihydrofolate reductase
`
`MTX(Giun)
`
`Dihydrofolate reductase
`Thymidylate synthase
`AICAR transformylase
`GAR transformylase
`
`Thymidylate synthase
`AICAR transformylase
`GAR transformylase
`
`{
`
`10-CHO-FH2 (Giun)
`
`{
`
`Thymidylate synthase
`GAR transformy\ase
`
`zolines ( trimetrexate, piritrexim )2+-26 and l 0-ethyl- l 0-
`( l 0-EDANl , Edatrexate ). 27 Com(cid:173)
`deazaaminopterin
`pounds with preservation of the benzoylglutamate termi (cid:173)
`nal group are transported by a folate-specific system in the
`cell membrane, whi le those lacking a terminal glutamate
`do not require active transmembrane transport and have
`activity against MTX -resistant cells that lack the folate
`transporter. 28 Recently, investigators have designed anti(cid:173)
`fo late analogues directed at targets other than DHFR,
`including t hose folate-dependent enzymes required for
`
`the de novo synthesis of purin es and thymidylate. A host
`of potent thymidylate synthase inhibitors such as 1 0-pro·
`pargyl-5,8-dideazafolate (PDDF, CB3717j29 and close!{;
`related compounds ZD1694,:~o LY2315l4,31 1843U89,
`and 5,8-dideazatetrahydrofolic acid (DDATHF )/3 an !11"
`d re(cid:173)
`hibitor of GAR transformylase, have been develope
`cently. Although each of these analogues has unique srruc -_
`tural features distinct from MTX with eq ual or greatel
`. I .b. .
`d
`, 1dent
`c
`potency 10r 111 u Itlng DHFR or other folate- epei . .
`enzymes, none has yet replaced MTX in the clinic. ThiS 15
`
`Lilly Ex. 2054
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`Antifolates
`
`111
`
`Table 6-1. Key Features of M ethotrexate
`
`Mechanism of actio n:
`
`Metabolism:
`
`Pharmacokinetics:
`Elimination:
`Drug in teractions:
`
`Toxicity:
`
`Precautio n:
`
`Inh ibition of di hyd roto late reductase leads to partial depletio n of reduced folates.
`l'olyglutamates of methotrexate and dihydrofolate inhibit purine and thymid ylate biosynthesis.
`Converted to polyglutamates in normal and malignant tissues.
`7-H yd roxylati on in liver.
`t 11,a = 2-3 h; t 11, f3 = 8- 10 h
`Primari ly as intact drug in urine.
`l . H igh dose toxicity to normal tissues resc ue by leucovorin .
`2 . L-Asparagi nase blocks toxicity and antitumor action .
`3. Pretreatment with metho trexate increases 5- fl uorouracil and ara C nucleo tide fo rm ati on.
`4 . Nonsteroidal anti-inflammator)' age nts dec rease renal clea rance and increase toxicity.
`1. Myelos uppression
`2 . M ucositis, gastroi ntestinal epithel ial de nudation
`3. Renal tubula r o bstructi on and injury
`4 . H epatotoxicity
`5. Pneumonitis
`6 . Hypersensitivi ty
`7 . Neurotox icity
`l. Redu ce dose in proportion to dec rease in creatin ine clearance.
`2 . Do nor ad minister hi gh-dose methotrexate to patients wirh abnormal rena l timcrio n .
`3. M oni tor plasma concentrations of drug and hydrate patients during hi gh-dose therapy
`(sec Tables 6-2 and 6-4 ).
`
`. I b
`.1. .
`l tl
`f
`Prin1arily be
`c:
`.
`cause o greater ,ami 1anty wit 1 ot 1 1e cyto-
`t
`OXIc a
`· ·
`CtiVIty and host toxicity patterns of MTX and the
`C .
`lltrent I
`I
`.
`w· 1
`ac <: of evidence that these analogue compo unds
`I
`.
`.
`.
`It 1 the
`'bl
`.
`h'b·
`poss1 e excepbon of the thym1dylate synt 1ase m -
`ff'
`· 1


`1 I tors l1a
`d ·f·
`t·• .
`' 've cit 1er Improved therapeutic e 1cacy or a 1 -
`etent
`spectrum of clinical activity.
`
`~~~HULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND
`ANISMS OF RESISTANCE
`

`In this s
`cyt
`. ectJo n the sequence of events that lead to the
`Otoxtc


`b


`With dru actton of MTX will be considered , egmnmg
`. g movement across the cell membrane, fo llowed
`by ·
`de/
`ts I ntracell ul ar metabolism to the polyglutamate
`IVative b' d'
`folat
`s,
`111 m g to d ih)rdro fo late red uctase and o ther
`' e-de
`d
`.
`and fi
`pen ent en zymes effects o n mtracellular folates,
`ll1al!y . I 'b· ·
`I
`'
`. E
`I
`f h
`' 11111 1t1 on of DNA synt 1es1s. ac 1 o
`step
`t ese
`cli1/ P1lays an essential role in determin ing the ultimate
`tea effi
`·c 1
`Jcacy and toxicity of M TX and other antu o ate
`con1
`Pounds.
`
`Transm b
`em tone Transport
`
`1'he n1
`ovement of MTX and other anti folates across
`ceiJ 1
`I
`f'
`11el11 br
`the p
`anes 1as received much attenti o n beca use o
`Opn1eotentia! role of transpo rt abno rmalities in the devel-
`nt of ·J'
`· 1
`,
`Cells b
`c Inica drug resistance (Fig. 6 -3). MTX enters
`Y an ene
`d
`· ·
`d
`rgy- ependent, temperature-sensitive, an
`conce
`.
`.
`ntt ative
`c:

`.
`of spe · fi
`process that likely depends on the I ll nwon
`is anQ c tn tramembrane protein (s).34-39 T his mechanism
`Ion-de
`d
`.
`. .
`pen ent and glucose -msenstbve 4 0-43 For a
`con1p . 1
`te 1ensiv


`tl
`1e reade. . e rev1ew o f the cellu lar transpo rt of fo lates,
`1
`ts referred to the recent article by Antony.'~4
`
`T he n_1embrane carrier responsible fo r MTX transport in
`mammalian cells also transports the natu rally occulTing
`reduced fo lates, incl uding
`the rescue agent 5-to rmyl(cid:173)
`tetrahydroto late (leucovorin ). 38•~3-17 T hus M T X and physio(cid:173)
`logic tolates compete for cell ular entry. In additio n, tl1 ro ugh
`a process known as heteroexchange, fi·ee intracellular MTX is
`forced to efflu x fi·o m cells when high concentratio ns of
`extJ·acellular reduced folate cross tl1e cellmembrane.48
`T he influx carrier for M T X is comprised of at least two
`different systems which include ( 1) a carrier o ften referred
`to as the reduced -folate carrier with a hig her affi nity fo r
`reduced fo lates and M TX (affi nity consta nt == 0 .7 to
`6 pM) when co mpared witl1 fo lic acid (affinity consta nt ==
`2 00 pM) and (2 ) a hydrop ho bic membrane-associated
`fo late-binding p1:otein(s) (human fo late recepto r, hFR) t11at
`has a 10- to 30-fold higher afnn ity fo r folic acid and tl1e re(cid:173)
`duced folates (nanomolar ran ge ) than for MTX_3+-39,47,49-52
`MTX polyglutamates dem o nstJ·ate a 100-fold increased
`affi nity for the folate-binding protein when compared
`with tl1e mo noglutamate fo rm of MTX. 53 Whether tl1ese
`two transport systems are directly interrelated or fu nction
`separately awaits the complete mo lec ular characterization
`of each of these transpo rt systems. Recently, a process
`referred to as potocytosis, a m echanism distinct ti·o m recep(cid:173)
`to r-mediated endocytosis, was fo und to be associated with
`fo late-binding proteinss+-56 T his mechanism has bee n
`used to descri be the accumul atio n o f binding proteins in
`distinct regions o f the cell membrane known as caJJcola
`that form intracellu lar vesicles containing protein -bound
`fo lates. Presumably, folates are released tl·om their hFRs
`through changes in pH that occur within the caveola .
`O nce released fi·om the h FRs in th e caveola, the fo lates
`may then enter the intracellular space via a specifi c m em (cid:173)
`brane carrier, perhaps representing the reduced -folate car-
`
`Lilly Ex. 2054
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`112
`
`CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND BIOTHERAPY
`
`Figure 6-2. Structures of tetrahydrofolate and clinically useful antifolate compounds.
`
`Pterldlne Ring
`
`p-Amlno
`Benz011te
`
`Glutemyl
`R .. ldues
`
`.~L,0~"'
`
`OCH,
`
`H~J....)
`
`N
`Trlmethoprim
`
`Cl
`
`NH,
`
`H~l N
`
`CH, -CH1
`
`Pyrimethamine
`
`1 O-Ethyl·1 O·Deaza Aminopterin
`
`CB 3717
`
`5-10 Dldeazatetrahydrofolate
`
`ZD 1694
`
`1843U89
`
`rier. Thus such a mechanism of transmembrane fc>late
`transport wou ld appear to incorporate the functions of
`both the folate- binding proteins and the reduced -folate
`carrier into one unified process.
`In the human nasopharyngeal KB carcinoma cell line
`and in monkey kidney cells, the membrane fi:.>late- binding
`protem was shown to be markedly upregu lated by fi:.>late
`depletion and, correspond ingly, downregulated in fc>late(cid:173)
`replete medium. Furthermore antibodies to hFR blocked
`transport of both folic acid and MTX, suggesti ng a role tor
`J ·
`'( 17-7 - o
`these b!Ild!Il



`g protems 111 folate accumu at1on:"·· ·' ·'" In
`contrast, the lower-affinity red uced-folate carrier appeared
`to be responsible for the majority of fc>late transport under
`
`conditions of high, no nphysiologic extracellul ar folate
`concentratio ns. T he folate-binding proteins have been
`shown to be highly expressed in hum an ovari an carci noma
`cells, thereby providing a biochemical rationale fc>r the use
`of antifo lates that specifically employ this protein fi.x cel(cid:173)
`lular transport in the treatment of ovarian carcino ma. ' 9
`6 0
`•
`An identical folate-binding protein has been isolated from
`other human tissues, including placenta, where two dis(cid:173)
`tinct forms representing the adult and fetal forms, respec(cid:173)
`tively, have been identified(,] Usin g a monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`body to folate-binding protein, this protein was found to
`be expressed in normal ovary, lung, thyroid, kidney, and
`choroid plexus 62 ·63 T he latter locatio n suggests a possible
`
`Lilly Ex. 2054
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`Antifolates
`
`113
`
`Figure 6-3. Transport systems identified far the physiologic folates and various antifolates. (Adapted from Antony et al. Blood
`79:2807, 1992.)
`
`PHYSIOLOGICAL
`SERUM FOLATE
`5-METHYLTETRAHYDROFOLATE
`
`NEWER
`ANT/FOLA TES
`
`'-·
`
`PHARMACOLOGIC FOLATES AND ANriFOLATfS
`
`I FOLIC ACID
`I
`
`5-FORMYLTETRAHYDROFOLATE METHOTREXATE (MTX)
`
`J
`(,--.-1-1,1 1 1 •
`
`l
`l '--
`' ~,..=====-.-.-~,
`l
`
`PLASMA MEMBRANE ~FOLATE RECEPTORS§ PLASMA MEMBRANE ~REDUCED FOLATE CARRIER~
`
`~PASSIVE DIFFUSION J
`
`viS
`other (?receptor-med•ated endocytoSis?)
`
`pass•ve dtHus•on
`at htgh extracellular
`. . , / ' fol ate concentr<1hon!i
`
`~....-'
`
`role for this protein in concentrating folate in the ce re(cid:173)
`brospinal fluid. Recently, a 1.1 -kilobase eDNA encod ing
`for an approximately 30-kDa folate -binding protein was
`cloned from several mammalian sources, and the gene was
`66 A proteolytic subunit
`mapped to chromosome 11q 13.64
`-
`of hFR, a soluble, hydrophilic fo late-binding protein , has
`been identified in human milk and serum. A precursor(cid:173)
`product relationship has been demonstrated by several
`laboratories for the soluble and membrane -bound t(mns
`of the folate -binding protein. 67·6H
`The exact role of these binding proteins in MTX and
`folate transport, either in trapping folatcs at the cell sur(cid:173)
`face or in their transport across the membrane, remai ns
`unclear at the present time. Transfecrion of human breast
`cancer cells that lack folate-binding protein with an h~R
`eDNA has led ro confl icting results with respect to MTX
`uptake and cytotoxicity 69 ·70 While these studies suggest a
`potential role for the folate-binding protein in tl1e trans(cid:173)
`port of physiologic folates, they do not conclusively
`demonstrate a role in MTX uptake; this result may be ex (cid:173)
`plained by the marked dependency of MTX transport on
`the red uced-folate carrier present in the specific human
`breast cancer cell line investigated. In contrast, other stud(cid:173)
`ies have shown that expression of a reduced-folate trans (cid:173)
`port protein is correlated with increased MTX transport
`and enhanced cytotoxicity in human leukemia cells. 71·72
`The accumulation of MTX in rumor cells can be influ(cid:173)
`enced by a variety of agents, including antitumor drugs
`commonly used with the anritolate in combination
`chemotherapy regimens. Vincristine increases intrace llu (cid:173)
`lar MTX by inhibitin g drug etllux. 7' ·74 The concentration
`of vincristine required to produce this eff-ect ( 10 pM),
`however, may not have direct clin ical relevance, since
`peak vincristine blood levels of only less than 0.1 p M can
`be achieved readily. In experimental chemotherapy of
`murine L 121 0 leukem ia, the seq uence of vincristine fol(cid:173)
`lowed by MTX administration did nor improve survival of
`tumor-bearing animals. For unexpl ained reasons, how (cid:173)
`ever, vincristine given 8 to 48 hours after MTX did pro-
`
`duce synergistic therapeuti c effects 74 MTX influx is in (cid:173)
`hibited by ouabain , glu cocorticoids, and cep halothin /s
`although none of these interactions has been shown to af
`feet the clinical activity of MTX. The bile salts ( cholate,
`taurocho late, and deoxycholate ) have been fo und to di (cid:173)
`minish hepatic MTX transport, and expansion of the bile
`salt pool has been considered as one potential approach
`to reduce MTX hcpatotoxicity 7 6 One of the major
`metabolites of MTX, 7 -0H -MTX, formed by the action
`of hepatic aldehyde oxidase, ~1 l so competes with MTX for
`cellular transport, thereby diminishing the intracellular
`79 The extent ro whic h this
`accumulation of MTX .77
`-
`metabolite is formed may play a role in modulating the
`cytotoxic activity of MTX, but its eff-ect on MTX trans(cid:173)
`port in the clinical setting remains uncertain.
`. The proliferative ~>r kinetic stare_ of tumor cells strongly
`mfluenccs the rate ot folate and M1 X transport. In general,
`rapidly dividing cells have a greater rate of MTX uptake and
`a decreased rare of drug efflu x when compared with cells
`that arc either in the stationary phase o r arc slowly g row(cid:173)
`ing .Ho In some experiments, indu ction of diff-erentiation of
`tumor cells, independent of eHects on growth rate,
`markedly decreased MTX transport ( 15 -fold).H' Transport
`effects, as wel l as increased requirements for DNA precur(cid:173)
`sors, increased thym idylatc synthase activity, and greater
`MTX polyglutamation all contribute to the greater cy(cid:173)
`totoxicity of MTX in rapidly dividing tumor cells. lt is
`noteworthy that the same proliteration dependency of
`MTX transport was not observed in intestinal epithel ial
`cells separated into hi gh and low proliterativc ti·actionsN2
`In addition to the hi g h -aftinity uptake syste m s de (cid:173)
`sc ribed above, a second, relatively less etl-icicnr transport
`mechanism has been descnbed ,.or drug concentrations
`in excess of 20 p i\1. si,H.' This process may represent as(cid:173)
`sivc ditfu sion and docs no r show com •)ctitio 11 be·t P
`ween
`.
`,
`t
`tolarcs and M fX or hercrocxchangc. This putar,·v .
`c cnrrv
`.
`.
`'
`process may prov1de the ration ale for the usc
`f 1 .

`. .
`
`1 11g 1-
`.
`l
`.
`dosc MTX 111 c!Imca practice.
`
`0
`
`Lilly Ex. 2054
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`114
`
`CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND BIOTHERAPY
`
`The efflux ofMTX from cells takes place through mul(cid:173)
`tiple mechanisms, one of which appears to be identical to
`85 The latter accounts for greater
`the influx carrier. 42 '84 ,
`than 70% of drug efflux in Ll210 cells in the absence of
`glucose. In glucose-replete conditions, most efflux (70%)
`occurs by two other glucose- and ATP-dependent routes.
`One pathway is inhibited by bromosulfophthalein (BSP),
`probenecid, prostaglandin A, and high concentrations of
`
`KCI and is shared by cyclic nucleotides. 86- 89 Although the
`efflux pathways for MTX in human leukemic lym(cid:173)
`phoblasts (CCRF-CEM cells) are identical to those
`described for the murine cells, the BSP-sensitive route is
`quantitatively insignificantY° Further work has shown
`that the efflux pump for MTX appears to be functionally
`distinct from the P-glycoprotein-mediated, multidrug re(cid:173)
`sistance system that has been described for the transport
`of naturally occurring antineoplastic agents. 9 1
`Both in vitro and in vivo experimental systems have
`identified defective transport as a common mechanism of
`intrinsic or acquired resistance to MTX. 92
`95 However,
`-
`there are other factors, including intracellular levels of
`DHFR, affinity ofDHFRfor MTX, polyglutamation, and
`levels of thymidylate synthase (TS) that also may exert a
`strong influence on MTX cytotoxic action and whose ef(cid:173)
`fects may not be easily separable from drug transport. A
`number of MTX-resistant cell lines with functional de (cid:173)
`fects in the reduced-fo late carrier have now been de(cid:173)
`scribed, with the majority being established by single-step
`selection in the presence of MTX.96
`100 The conditions
`-
`employed to generate these mutant cell lines in vitro
`often use a higher folate concentration ( l to 5 ~1M) than
`that normally found in vivo (5 to 50 nM). Therefore, neo (cid:173)
`plastic cells with a markedly reduced capacity to transport
`folates may not be able to survive in vivo in a low-folate
`environment. 101 As an example of this, analysis of a
`murine leukemic Ll210 cell line resistant to MTX
`revealed an impaired ability to transport MTX, folic acid,
`and 5-formyltetrahydrofolate via the reduced-folate car(cid:173)
`rier system 102 However, the growth of these resistant
`cells was maintained by the use of a second transport
`system that was unable to transport MTX but whose
`activity was sufficient to allow cell growth in medium sup (cid:173)
`plemented with folate (2.2 ~1M). An IvlTX-resistant
`human lymphoblastic CCR.F-CEM/MTX cell line was
`established and maintained in physiologic concentrations
`offolate (2 nM) 103 These cells lacked the reduced -folate
`carrier protein and, solely for this reason, were resistant to
`MTX. However, these cells retained the folate -binding
`protein, and using this efficient transport process, their
`growth was maintained even in nanomolar concen (cid:173)
`trations of folic acid. This study is of particular interest
`because the concentration of folate employed was in the
`physiologic range, and thus this mechanism of transport(cid:173)
`mediated resistance may have direct clinical relevance .
`With the increasing availability of molecular reagents
`for the human folate receptor, studies have indicated that
`in selected cell lines the hFR may contribute to MTX
`transport, and changes in hFR may contribute to the
`
`development of cellular MTX resistance. Nine MT~d-
`·d ·mol
`1
`resistant clones from a human nasopharyngea ep1 er
`(KB) parent cell line that lacks the reduced-folate trans(cid:173)
`porter were established and maintained in low-fola~~
`media (1 to 10 nM). 104 Each of these sublines was MT
`resistant as a result of an impaired MTX transport that cor(cid:173)
`related with both decreased activity and decreased pro~!11
`expression of the human folate receptor. Further stu e~
`examining the molecular basis for the decreased lev~~
`hFR revealed that both the levels of hFR-specific 111 d
`and gene copy number were correspondingly decrease ·
`!o b~gin ~o identifY clinical MT_x resistanc~ on~!:~
`bas1s of nnpa1red transport, a sens1t1ve compeuuve T:X:
`placement assay using the fluorescent analogue of M

`, f1 ores-
`_
`N-( 4-ammo-4-deoxy- N 10-methylpteroyl )- N-( 4 - u
`1
`ceinthiocarbamyl)-L-lysine (PT430) has been deve
`oped. 105 An analysis of 17 patients with acute lymphocyuc
`.
`ffour
`leukem1~ (ALL) revealed that blast cells from two 0 T:X:-
`pattents 111 relapse following initial treatment w1th M
`based combination chemotherapy demonstrated defec:
`tive MTX transport. While this study offers suggesuve e~
`idence that impaired transport may play an important r? ~
`in the development of clinical MTX resistance, its true 111
`cidence and clinical relevance remain to be determined.
`Significant differences in the characteristics of anuf~­
`late drug transport have prompted interest in the deve -
`·tolates
`opment of new analogues. The nonglutamated anti
`1
`such as trimetrexate and piritrexim as well as the glutamY
`ort
`,
`.
`' .
`.
`esters of MTX, do not requtre acttve cellular t1 ansp

`· t nt mu-
`· ·
`d d
`an
`emonstrate acttvtty agamst transport-rests a
`. . e
`tantS. 106-108 The dibutyl ester of MTX inhibits thymtdtn
`I .
`DN
`c.om ttS
`.
`.
`.
`mcorporanon mto
`A, apparently resu ung 11
`_
`· 1 ·b·
`1o9 Tl · com
`115
`.
`.
`cc
`11111 ttory euects on thymtdme transport.
`X . mouse
`d .
`.
`1
`poun
`ts raptdly hydrolyzed to parent MT
`111
`obutY

`I
`b
`P asma ut 1s converted to an alpha- or gamma-mon
`_
`derivative in human plasma; the latter is a stable come
`pound that effectively inhibits DHFR.110 The quinazohn f
`·rate 0
`1
`·fi l
`h
`] · h
`ann o ates ave a 11g er rate of influx and a owe1
`'
`.
`efflux than does MTX while aminopterin has a faster tn-
`'
`· ua-
`flux rate; these differences correlate with the greater 111
`_
`0
`cellular accumulation of the quinazolines and at11ll1.
`.
`d~!l1
`ptenn as compared with MTX after equimolar
`0
`.
`EDAM) tS
`Ill
`.
`. 11
`10-Ethyl-10-deazaaminopterin (10-
`VIVO .
`,d wtr
`·dl
`more av1 y accumulated in tumor cells compare
`1 5
`normal bone marrow or intestinal epithelium and 1a
`.
`"t)' ili~
`•
`b
`d
`roa er therapeunc activity and less marrow toXIC!
`MTX in experimental systems. 28,1 12 vVhile the parent com·
`pound (10-EDAM) has essentially no inhibitory acttYttYs

`.
`d fort11
`agamst thymtdylate synthase, its polygluta111ate ·
`_
`1
`have sign ificant inhibitory activity.l 13 This effect of pol) g_

`· .. 1
`ll 4 115 In con
`I
`utamatton ts sum ar to that noted for MTX.
`'
`tl ,


`for 1c
`trast to MTX, wh tch has a relatively poor affintty
`. d
`folate -binding proteins, several of the recently syntllestze .
`"fi I
`· 1 · ·
`-
`uch as
`anti o ate 1111tbttors of thym idylate synthase s
`. ,
`· I
`ffit11~
`CB3
`. e
`717 and ZD1694 rely heavily on the htg 1-a
`.
`b. d"
`11 6 11 7 StJlC
`fi 1
`o ate- 111 mg protems for cellular transport.
`'
`c. _
`·her 1°
`1
`r11
`t 1ese compounds are efficiently transported by eit
`e
`late transport system, they may be Jess susceptible to
`
`Lilly Ex. 2054
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`Antifolates
`
`115
`
`~mergence of clinical resistance resulting from alterations
`tn membrane transport. H o mofolate is a DHFR inhibitor
`that is transported primarily by the folate-binding proteins
`and has extremely potent activity against malignant cells
`overexpressing this protein. 118 This antifolate analogue
`and the thymidylate synthase inhibitors may prove to be
`particularly interesting agents for the treatment of human
`solid tumors that have developed MTX resistance due to
`etther downregulation or alterations of the reduced-folate
`carrier system . Certain of these antifolate analogue com(cid:173)
`pounds have now undergone clinical evaluation . Tri (cid:173)
`metrexate and piritrexim have completed phase I and II
`evaluation, demonstrating on ly modest activity against
`human solid tumors. 119-121 Trimetrexate combin ed with
`leucovorin has significant activity against the pulmonary
`pathogen Pneumocystis carinii, whose DHFR enzyme is
`htghly sensitive to this combination, in contrast to its
`ltmited sensitivity to the commonly used anti-infectious
`agent trimethoprim ?,l22 10-EDAM has clinical activity
`agamst a variety of human solid tumors. Its dose-limiting
`toxtctty is mucositis rather than the myelosuppression
`123 Recent
`normally associated with MTX therapy. 115
`'
`phase II testing has shown this agent to be active in
`the treatment of non-small cell lun g cancer, soft-tissue
`sarcoma , and breast cancer with overall response rates of
`17%, 14%, and 41%, respectively. J1 5,12-I,J25 While the clini(cid:173)
`cal development of CB3717 was aborted due to severe
`and unpredictable nephrotoxicity resulting fi·om precipi(cid:173)
`tatton of this compound in the nephrorubules, ZD1694,
`a more water-soluble antifo late inhibito r of thym idylate
`synthase with no associated nephrotoxicity, is presently
`Undergoi ng phase II evalu ation. 126·127
`
`Intracellular Transformation
`
`Naturally occurring fol ates exist within cells as poly(cid:173)
`g:utamates through ti1e action of the enzyme folylpoly(cid:173)
`g _utamyl synilietase (FPGS ) iliat adds up to six glutamyl
`~toups 111 gamma peptide lin kage to the folate substrate.
`f: Ius reaction serves ti1ree main purposes for folates: ( 1) it
`actlitates the accumulation ofi ntracellular folates in vast ex(cid:173)
`cess of the monoglutamate pool that is fi·eely transportable
`I
`.
`.
`Into a d
`.
`<11
`o ut of cells
`(2) It allows se ectJve mtra-
`cellu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket