throbber
PROCEEDINGS
`
`at‘
`
`«.1
`
`Eighty—Third ‘§1___1nual Meeting
`
`of the American Association
`
`for Cancer Research
`
`May 20-23, 1992
`
`San Diego, California
`
`Volume .33
`
`March 1992
`
`Lilly Ex. 2049
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`PRECLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY/EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
`
`2421
`
`Biological properties of (68)-, (6R)-, and (6R,S)-leucovorirt.
`McGuire, ].]., Russell, C.A., 8: Heltzman, l<.]. Grace Cancer Drug
`Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263
`(6R,S)-leucovorin (LV) is used to selectively "rescue"> the toxic
`effects of methotrexate (MTX) and to biochemically modulate the
`anti-tumor effects of fluoroplyrlmidines (FPs).
`(65)-LV is
`biologically active, while (6R)- V is assumed to be inert. We
`compared the biological pr
`rtlesof ure fire
`rations of these
`isomers, with particular em
`is on
`eir a ii? to form ol (7-
`Iutam‘yl) metabolites.
`(
`LV was 24000-fol more ab e t
`6R)-L to rotect CCRP-CEM cells from the growth inhibitory
`effects of
`' (65)-LV modulated theGfirowth inhibito
`activity
`of i-‘P5, while at an equivalent levels (
`)-LV did not. 69- and
`(6R,S)-I..V were substrates for human and rat foiylpoly Iutamate
`synthetase (FPGS); (GR)-LV was essentially inactive
`th as a
`substrate and inhibitor of these FPGS. Lack of conversion to
`polyglutamates may thus contribute to the diminished biolo cal
`activity of (6R)-L . After nonenzymatic conversion o l..V
`pre
`rations to their respective 10-formlyltetrah drofolate forms,
`all orms were FPGS substrates; the VI
`of
`e natural isomer
`was only 2-fold hi her“ than that of ‘ate unnatural isomer.
`Stereospecificity of
`S at C-6 of reduced folates is thus
`e
`rofoundl d
`d
`ton the
`e of 1-
`ho
`bstitu t.
`Ken enand
`car
`ti su
`en
`upported y C
`
`2422
`Improved clinical tolerance of loinetrexol with oral folic acid.
`Young, C.W., Currie, V.E Muindi. .l.F., Saltz, l..B., Pisters, K.M.W.,
`Esposito, A..l.. and
`lie. R.W.’, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
`n .
`-
`lcedntiiggw York.
`10021, and ‘Eli Lilly and Co., lndianapolis,
`Lomettexol (LTX , an inhibitor of GAR transfortnylase that binds
`tightly to cellular olate binding‘protein (FBI? produced severe
`cumu ative toxicity in its initial
`inical trial ( roc. ASCO 9:76. 1990).
`In mice folate depletion increases the toxicity of LTX 100-fold; the
`theta utic index is restored by oral folic acid supplementation (Ptoc
`AAC 32:324. 1991). Nineteen of 53
`tients in our i.v. dose-finding
`trial received LTX in combination wit oral folic acid. -Dose-limiting
`toxicities were thro
`openia and anemia; mucositis and diarrhea
`were also observed. Wit out folic acid, the MTD of LTX was 2.7
`mg[m2 twice weekly x 4 doses, every 28 to 35 days; cumulative
`toxicity was observed. With oral folic acid at 1 mg/day continuously,
`the recommended Phase ll dose is 4 to S mg/m2 twice weekly it 4
`‘
`doses at 28 day intervals; cumulative toxicity is absent. A patient with
`oropharyngea cancer has had a Complete
`es onse of 18 months
`duration: lesser antitumor effects were seen in _ additional patients.
`Concomitant oral folic acid enhances tolerance to the toxic effects of
`lometrexol without eliminatin therapeutic response to the drug.
`This effect could be mediated
`a decrease in enterohepatic
`reabsorption of LTX following its biliary secretion.
`
`2423
`Development of a fluorescence HPDC method for analysis of
`loinetrexol in biologic samples. Muindi, .I.F.,;Cutrie, V.E., Shih, C.‘
`and Young, C.W. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New
`n .
`-
`'
`IY%l'l(.4l:2Y851lX)21, and ‘Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis,
`Lomettexo 5.10-dideazatetrahydrofolate (LTX . an inhibitor of
`GAR tr
`ormylase that binds ti htly to folate inding proteins
`(FBP). is undergoin clinical trial
`cause of its broad activity
`against trans lant
`turnorsin mice. We are developing a sensitive
`and s eciflc
`IE method for quaiititation of LTX an possible
`meta olites in biologic fluids. Oxidized l0—deaza-pteridines are
`intensely fluorescent but N-10 pteridines and reduced 10-deaza-
`teridines have negligible fluorescence.’ l.TX in plasma or urine is
`reed from FBP by incubation in armnoruum fotmate pH 3, then
`extracted by perchlorate precipitation. The protein-free extract is
`oxidized by exposure to man anese dioxide at 90°C for 1Q minutes
`then chtomatographed on a 18 reverse hase column using
`fluorescence detection with excitation at 30nm and emission at
`425nm. ln human serum and urine the assa is linear between 0 and
`1000 nM; the lower limit of quantitation is
`nM. The within day
`and between day coefficients of variation have been < 10% and <
`has con irmed dru accumu ation and slowed clearance rates
`15% res ectively. Study of patients treated on Days I, 4. 8, and 11
`between Day 1 an Day 11.
`'
`
`2424
`ICI D1804 resistant col Ines. AL Jaeltman. LR. Kelland. M. Brown. W. Gibson.
`rt. Kltnbel. W. Atiame+ and LR. Judson The lnstlute of cancerliasserch. Staten
`U.K. +Dlv.BlotI'ledleal Ros. University of Surrey, Guldlord. U.K
`Three ed lhse. the mouse L1210 letltamh and the huttun CH1 and 41!!
`warlan lines (IO, -10. asand 13nM). were made resistant (step-Mae heremems
`ioeooonu) to the thymidytate synthase (TS) lnhlblot. ICI 0169!. T3 activity was
`raised slgillicantty In the Cl-lt:R the (3.5-told). An ELISA method confirmed a
`raised level of the enzyme protein (-9-fold). Alterexposure to o.1uM ‘H lcl D1894
`(¢u.) tor 24hrs. Oi-l1:F| cells accutndatod normal levels of ’H (~3uM) but whereas
`In the parental cells the polyglutaimte derivatives illllw Dfodomlnated (aim) in
`the G-l1:R eels gluu were the major fractions (70%). The Kl vdusa for gtu. and
`du, were unchanged tor Ts extracted irotn this the (a2nM and 1.2nM
`respectively). Cross-resistance to Fdurd (25-told) suggests that the small elevation
`inTSlevaltnaybeattIa]orm‘achatiiunollGI D1694 tesiatancelnthlstheandtho
`cl'angelnpolygIuemateptolllenIinyaugniet1ttliis(uu,le ~3-foldlessadiveand
`do. and glu. ~2-lcld more active than gu, against T8).
`In the 41M:R eels
`decreased uptaltevlaths reduced-loletecartlet lathe mechanletnotteslstanceto
`ICI Dtwd end alhough potyglutamatlon is reduced as I result of decreased
`uptake the pattern at polyghitanuites Is not slutllcently changed iprodotnlnorlly
`glu“). TheL12to:RlnehasaamaI decreasolntl\a|t\ltlaIvelocltyforI.i:itakeol
`I01 01694 but ls tnalottnechanlstnoi resktanools Istalureto polygluatnatelcl
`D1694. Exposure oi parental and L12to:R cells tor tens to _1uM lcl D1694
`resulted In ~0.35uM wt in both cell lines but only the parental cells iotmed
`polyduamales (~11uM). cross-resuance studies with antlolates of defined
`tmdedactbnconlkmmeproposedmectwlumdteelstancelotfliesecellhes
`
`2425
`Polyglutarnetlon ot the thymldylate eynthnu (TS) Inltlhlter, Icl mesa AL
`Jackman. W. Gbson‘. T.C. Stephens‘ and F.T. Boyle‘. Inst. cancer lies. Stilton.
`UK. *lC| Pltarmaceutleals, Aldetley Park. Ilaccleelleld. Cheshire. UK
`.
`I01 D1694 Isequlnazolhe entlolatethataetsvlalntilbllon oiTS souls
`in clinical study. The potent activity oi the drug against L121o eels (IC..=anM)
`leduetomegoodceIiIatqita1tevIad'neredt.iced-tola1ecamet(liFc) and rapid
`inttaceldar polyglilarnatlon (Jadtnnn at H. Cancer Res. 5125619-6588. I991).
`PolyuutamatlonollclD1694hesbeetittIeasuedh1hehu'nancelIInes.W1L2.
`tymphoblastold (IO,-6nM) and MGF-7 breast (I<_:,,=o.7nM). Csllswore exposed
`to1oonM’H lamest (gtu.)endaI1ttieeeuuu’Hwastoundesgu., Altar
`aomlns -1uM‘l-ldtugoqulvelems wotolotnd lntrecelluhttywlh 1% and eoxgu,
`respectively (d and glu, being the respective malor metabolites). At 4hl8 <1o%
`of the celhlar»
`was git. it both cal lites (W112 - du,-3%. glu,-18$.
`t!U.~2295. ‘Ulla-52%. 9||la"%) ("(7-7 = d||a"995. GU.-40%. Dl|l4"20%.
`du.-22%). By 24 hrs there was -iouu ‘H lnttacelulatly and glu. predominated
`In both cell lines (w1L2 -60% and MGF-1 -55%). WIL2 cells incubated lord hrs
`iolltmodbyzflitshdnig-lteemedlumdld tiotloseaslgtiliicntitattiinointofi-I.
`Ttmpdygltlamationuwoaasamectiamstntotdmgaceumletlonuidretetllui ..
`atidhviawofttnpotomT3kiiI:ltoryactl~AtyoithopolygltIamates(du.
`I0-60nM: giu.- 1nM). we conclude that IGI D1694 acts by metabolism to
`polydmatmtos. 5l.IJp0l‘lll|fl this Is the poorer youth lnhlbllcn of two analogues
`(7-CH, and 2-hl-l,) of I01 D1694 (~150- and some rospectwely) desple being 6
`and 15-fold better T8 lnhbltors
`studies indicate that the 7-CH, compound
`cannot be polyduatnated and that the 2-NH. compound Is pclyduettutad less
`rondllyduoto poorceluhruptake. If0$lfl0lI8l9.|ll.l'Olol.llOthORFC.
`
`2426
`PtmeolIhloIIcID1Dl:enonlItynldyIeueylIlIeohIIiiior.Gatkes.‘.
`Wad J.‘, Flaming A‘. Splers J.’, Smith I1’. Vetwel] J.‘ and Judson I.‘ 1. Inst of
`cancer Res. Sutton. surrey. UK. 2. Rotterdam cancerlnst. Rotterdam, Holland. 3.
`I01 Pha-maeetllcals. Macclssiteld. Cheshka. UK.
`lcl D1694 lsewatersolibletnilnazollnabased tttymldylete synthase ('I'S)lnhltillcr.
`ltsptedocassoi.O88717stiomdunLunnoutactNity.hnmmutdevdopnnnwas
`halted because of liver and kidney toxicities due to poorwetet solubility oepsclnly
`atacidpfl. Thophaaelstudyoilcl D1694begancn27/2/91 attheliloyal
`Marsden Hospital
`(RMI-I) using a constant lv hiuelon over 15 min. 41 3/52
`Patient: live been treated I doses of 0.1. 0.2. 0.4. 0.6. 1.0, 1.6. 2.6 and
`a.5tng/tn’. 27 pts (mm 23. Rotterdam 4; tall, BF: mean age 57: ECOG Ps 0:11,
`1:13. 2:3) have received 51 courses (median 2. range 1-6). Tumour types include
`colon9.aarcoma4. heodand neck4.mesothsllotna3.oteeat2. ovaty1.glloma
`1.tileductt.catchold1ondstomech1. Mueosnlshasbesnseenh4pts(Wt-I0
`grade 1:2. 22). at doses 0.4, as. 1.0 and 1.6tng in‘. One patient had a tall In
`EDTA clearance of 25%l'flUotlOdt:|Be oi0.4mg/ which persisted after stopping
`tiaatrnentatatlmeotgetisraltseddlscaaeprogresdcn. Nosutisequentpttnshad
`atalllntemthinctbnoneptdevelopedgradezanaemhmdleucopeivatmt
`alter a 2nd dose at 2.6mg/m‘. 2 pts (at 1.6 and zsmg/in’) have developed
`asymptomatic abtiotmalnlas of liver lmctlon which roqura further lnvestlfitlon,
`both have progressive disease. Ptnrrmeotthetlc studies show a linear dose/auc
`relationship and clearance conforms to a 3 compartment model. No responses
`haveystbeenobsetvodln24ovaIuabiepts TheM'l’Dhasnotyetbeenreached.
`mhunvtwuuppomdbyvnculeuflneuohcurpalgnutdhtlmunnoeimeah.
`
`PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH
`VOLUME 33 0 MARCH- 1992
`406
`
`Lilly Ex. 2049
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket