throbber
vs
`
`1L\
`
`çr
`
`---i/
`
`-_-_
`
`---
`
`.-
`
`$j
`
`---
`
`------ --
`
`Tif
`
`810-Medical
`
`Library
`
`.4
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`tJ
`
`Lilly Ex. 2022
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318
`
`

`
`PHASE
`
`TRIALS
`
`560
`
`1558
`PHASE
`ii DeVore
`
`.jotte
`
`is
`
`IL-8
`
`attenuated
`
`treatment
`
`STUDY OF THE ANTINEOVASCULARIZATION
`Wamil
`Hellerqvist
`Wakefield
`Yan
`Carter Y-F Wang
`York
`Vanderbilt University Nashville TN 37232
`CM-i0i
`induces
`neovascular
`polysaccharide that
`bacterial
`inflammation in malignant tumors Twenty seven patients with refractory
`study of CM-i 01 The first
`15
`were enrolled in
`malignancies
`phase
`received CM-iOl
`patients Group 11
`15-minute infusion
`intravenously by
`every other day three times in one week
`at doses
`ranging from
`units/Kg Cycles were repeated every 3-4 weeks
`Twelve
`l7.Spgl/Kg to
`additional patients Group 21 were treated on
`10 schedule of
`weekly
`of CM-lOi
`which
`six received
`3.3 units/Kg
`and
`received
`units/Kg
`of CM-lOi
`1gM
`Serum was
`the development
`lgG and
`snslyzed for
`Inflammatory cytokines were analysed
`following each treatment
`For
`the
`patients the maximally tolerated dose was 3.3 units/Kg
`and dose
`Group
`limiting toxicities included grade IV dyspnes and arrhythmia encountered
`the
`level
`12 hours
`Toxicities occurred primarily within the first
`units/Kg
`following therapy snd included mild to moderate fever/chills nausea cough
`headache
`flushing dyspnea myslgiss and acute tumor-related pain
`fscial
`No patient
`CM-lOi
`developed
`detectable
`antibodies
`patients
`All
`time- snd dose-dependent elevations in all cytokines
`marked
`experienced
`studied Peak cytokine ranges pg/mI were as follows TNFa 1243 49221
`mip-io 1535- 8.174 lL-6 1212- 10150 IL-8 11582-161551
`180-
`1149- 1259 ng/ml
`In both patient groups peak TNFo
`14631 sE-selectin
`snd
`responses occurred
`following the
`but were
`treatment
`first
`following the 2nd and 3rd treatments However when Group
`2-3 week rest
`treatment cycles
`following
`patients received
`subsequent
`to those observed
`peak cytokine levels were similar
`following their
`that more treatment
`This may indicate
`is necessary
`interval
`to
`CM-101 can be
`response
`the desired
`repetitive inflammatory
`generate
`for severe and possibly
`safely administered at doses that produce evidence
`tumor specific inflammation Supported by CarboMed Inc and GCRC MOb
`RR00095
`
`DRUG CM-i 01
`Thurman
`Sundell
`Zhang and
`Johnson
`
`unit
`
`at
`
`IL-b
`
`initial
`
`regimens
`
`TRIAL TO EVALUATE ORALLY ADMINISTERED
`PHASE
`EVERY WEEKS
`IRINOTECAN HCL CPT-I1 GIVEN DAILY
`IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY MALIGNANCIES
`Dreneler
`Burns
`Eckhardt
`Hodges
`Kraynak
`Dietz
`Eckardt
`Kuhn
`Smith
`Peacock
`Rizzo
`Schaaf
`Rinaldi
`Rodriguez
`Von Hoff
`The University of Texas Health Science
`Thurman
`Center San Antonio TX Cancer Therapy
`Research Center San Antonio
`TX Brooke Army Medical Center Ft Sam Houston TX and The Upjohn
`Company Kalamazoo MI
`Irinotecan CPT-1
`soluble camptothecin
`semi-synthetic water
`inhibitor with substantial
`antitumor activity
`derivative is
`topoisomerase
`variety of dosing schedules
`by the
`It has been studied clinically
`in
`route The development
`of an oral
`formulation would provide
`intravenous
`therapy enhance quality of
`the opportunity for cost-effective outpatient
`for intravenous
`at cancer
`by preventing prolonged
`stays
`life
`clinics
`of chronic dosing
`administration
`and allow for convenient
`infusions
`The objectives
`of
`this study were to determine the maximally-
`tolerated dose MTD and the dose limiting toxicity of
`irinotecan when
`days to characterize
`day for five consecutive
`administered orally once
`of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 and to detect
`the phannacokinetics
`To date 13 patients pts
`male
`any evidence of antitumor activity
`female ages 29-74 with advanced
`refractory solid tumors have received
`dose levels 20 40 66 and 100 mg/m2/day
`40 courses of treatment over
`The majority of patients
`weeks schedule
`treated
`on
`every
`had 5-FU refractory metastatic colon cancer 12/13
`Entry criteria
`good
`status 0-2 adequate
`included
`performance
`organ function
`hematologic status and absence of any condition which could impalr oral
`Irinotecan was administered diluted in 50 ml of Cran
`medication intake
`Grape juice Patients
`his prior and
`his post oral administration
`fasted
`Dose
`Grade
`included diarrhea and neutropenia
`limiting toxicities
`diarrhea despite use of aggressive
`loperamide support occurred
`in 1/1 Pt
`occurred
`at 100 mg/m2/d and 2/6 pts at 66 mg/m2/d
`Grade
`neutropenia
`Pt at 100 mg/m2/d and 1/6 pts at 66 mg/m2/d
`Further patient accrual
`in I/I
`to better define the dose recommended
`for phase II studies
`is currently in
`All other
`toxicities were
`or
`less
`Pharmacokinetic
`grade
`progress
`of lactone total and glucuronide forms
`analysis including concentrations
`of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 quantified by high performance
`by the Upjohn Company
`liquid chromatography is ongoing
`Supported
`
`daily
`
`561
`
`is
`
`EVERY OTHER WEEK IRINOTECAN CPT-l1 RESULTS
`OF
`AND PHARMACOKINETIC PK STUDY ML Rothenbere
`PHASE
`D.A Rinaldi LS Smith
`Hodges A.M Thurman N.K Ichhpurani
`Schaaf
`SO Eckhardt 0.1 Rodriguez
`Drengler AJ Dietz T.C Murphy
`Villalona
`HA Burns III D.D Von Hoff The University of Texas Health Science Center at
`San Antonio TX Cancer Therapy and Research Center San Antonio TX Brooke
`Army Medical Center FL Sam Houston TX and The Upjohn Co Kalamazoo MI
`Irinotecan hydrochloride CPT-1
`water-soluble camptothecin analog with
`small cell and non-small cell lung ovarian and
`promising activity agalnst colorectal
`week wk schedule
`allows administration of
`cervical cancers While
`once every
`and results in
`higher single doses
`slightly higher dose intensity weekly drug
`administration allows for more frequent dosing which may be important
`for
`cell-
`an every other wk drug
`cycle specific drag such
`as this
`is possible that
`It
`could combine the most
`favorable aspects of dose intensity
`administration schedule
`We are conducting
`and PK trial
`Phase
`and
`dose
`this thug
`of
`frequency
`administration schedule To date 20 patients jsts have been enrolled 13
`and
`Median age 53.5 range 29-77 WHO
`all are evsluable for toxicity during cycle
`PS 013 16 21 Thirteen
`pta have colon cancer
`adenoca of the
`rectal cancer
`adenoca of unknown primary Clinical
`toxicities are as follows
`small bowel and
`Medisn ANc
`Nadir cycle
`cells/mm
`reese
`
`Dose
`
`Level
`
`Pts
`
`cycles
`
`Evsluable/
`
`Administered
`
`mg/rn2
`
`Eatered
`
`Pa With
`ItT
`Type of DLT
`
`125
`
`4/4
`
`3/3
`
`22
`
`31
`
`2825 1417-5548
`
`LY23 1514 N-
`
`1559
`NOVEL MUL11-
`OF
`EVALUATION
`PHASE
`LY23 1514
`EVERY 21 DAYS 1A
`ADMINISTERED
`TARGETED ANTIFOLATE
`Rodriguez SO Eckhardt SM Fields JR
`Rinnidi HA Burns PA Don
`Lu DD Von Hoff From the
`Woodworth JO Kuhn
`Langley
`Clark
`and Research Center and Brooke Army Medical Center San
`Cancer Therapy
`Antonio TX and Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis IN
`
`pyrimidin -5-yl ethyl benzoyl-L-glutamic
`
`acid disodium salt
`
`is multi-
`
`which
`
`inhibits
`
`the enzymes thymidylate
`doses were administered
`
`antifolate compound
`targeted
`synthase and dihydrofolate reductase
`Escalating
`to patients with advanced
`21 days
`refractory
`and determine the maximally-tolerated
`antitumor activity of the
`profile and potential
`was
`escalation
`based
`
`intravenously every
`tumors to assess toxicities
`
`solid
`
`dose
`
`the Modified
`
`Continual
`
`patient
`
`MTD pharmacokinetic
`Dose
`compound
`on
`treated at each minimally toxic dose
`Reassessment Method with
`total of 37 patients 27 males 10 females median age 59 yo median
`level
`PS 90% were treated with 132 courses at
`dose levels ranging from 50 to
`The MTD of LY23 1514 was 600 mglm2 with reversible
`700 mg/m2
`neutropenia thrombocytopenia and fatigue
`as the dose-limiting toxicities
`included mild to moderate
`observed
`
`Nonhematologic
`
`toxicities
`
`fatigue
`
`anorexia
`
`nausea
`
`diarrhea mucusitis
`
`transaminase
`
`elevations
`
`Pharmacokinetic
`
`and
`
`reversible
`
`the 600 mg/m2 dose level demonstrated
`treatment at
`life maximum plasma concentration clearance
`area under
`
`and
`
`Partial
`
`and in
`
`obtained
`
`in
`
`promising agent
`
`volume of distribution at steady-state
`apparent
`41.7 mI/minim2 293.3 meg-hr/mI
`meg/mI
`and 26.55
`percent of the compound was excreted
`Seventy-eight
`patients with advanced pancreatic
`responses were achieved in
`cancer Minor
`patients with advanced
`patients with advanced
`for the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies
`
`hepatic
`rash
`course of
`analysis after the first
`mean harmonic half-
`the curve AUC
`of 5.07 hours
`L1m2 respectively
`in the urine
`
`142
`
`unchanged
`
`colorectal
`
`colorectal
`
`cancer
`
`cancer
`
`responses were
`LY23 1514 is
`
`150
`
`175
`
`200
`
`225
`
`6/6
`
`6/6
`
`1/1
`
`46
`
`32
`
`1699 3473574
`
`2831 160-4935
`
`2t72 300-3637
`
`4500
`
`Febrile nest and
`ANC
`days
`
`grade
`
`Febnle nest asd
`
`grade
`
`disarhea
`
`Other common toxicitics
`have been nausea vomiting fatigue and anorexia none of
`which have been dose limiting Preliminary PK data from the first
`dose levels
`max and AUC for CPT-l
`linear relationship between
`drug dose
`reveal
`once MTD is reached
`for SN-38 Phsnnacodynamic relationships
`will
`evaluated
`in CEA
`confirmed PR and
`One pt with colon cancer has had
`others have had
`50% With an MTD
`200 mg/m2 this schedule
`dose intensity that will
`of
`has
`wk schedule
`vs 116.7 mg/m2/wk
`or exceed
`100 mg/m2/wk
`approach
`the
`drug 33% more frequently
`to the 225
`Accrual
`while administering
`respectively
`every other wk administration of
`mg/m2 dose level
`In conclusion
`is ongoing
`dose intensity and
`CPT- 11 is feasible and may provide the optimal balance
`between
`dose frequency This study was sponsored by The Upjohn Company
`
`but not
`
`fall
`
`PROCEEDINGS OF ASCO VOL 15 MAY 1996
`
`489
`
`Lilly Ex. 2022
`Sandoz v. Lilly IPR2016-00318

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket