throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SANDOZ INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. Patent 7,772,209 to Niyikiza
`Issued Date: Aug. 10, 2010
`Title: Antifolate Combination Therapies
`
`Inter Partes Review No. 2016-00318
`
`DECLARATION OF LAURA A. LYDIGSEN IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER'S MOTION TO ADMIT PRO HACVICE
`LAURA A. LYDIGSEN AS BACKUP COUNSEL
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`IPR2016-00318
`Sandoz v. Eli Lilly
`Exhibit 1055-00001
`
`

`
`I, Laura A. Lydigsen, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an experienced litigating attorney and a shareholder at the law
`
`firm of Brinks Gilson & Li one with approximately 10 years of experience, with a
`
`substantial portion of my practice consisting of litigating patent cases. As an
`
`example, I am currently counsel in the patent litigation matter Horizon Pharma
`
`Ireland Limited et al. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., No. 1: 14-cv-7992, in the
`
`United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. This matter involves a
`
`patents related to a pharmaceutical product.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member of good standing in the Illinois State Bar. I am also
`
`admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of the United States; U.S. Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit; U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
`
`Illinois; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois; U.S. District Court
`
`for the Southern District of Indiana; and the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans
`
`Claims.
`
`3.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court, department, bureau, or commission of any State of the United States.
`
`4.
`
`I have never been denied admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never received any reprimand from any such court, department,
`
`bureau, or commission pertaining to conduct or fitness as a member of the bar.
`
`2
`
`Exhibit 1055-00002
`
`

`
`6.
`
`I have reviewed and agree to comply with the United States Patent
`
`and Trademark Office's Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board's Rules of
`
`Practice for Trials set forth in 37 C.F.R. part 42.
`
`7.
`
`I have reviewed and agree to be bound by the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office's Rules of Professional Conduct under 37 C.F.R. § 11.101 et
`
`seq., disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § l l. l 9(a), and any additional rules
`
`and orders governing this proceeding.
`
`8.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice for any other proceedings
`
`before the USPTO in the last three years.
`
`9.
`
`I am currently counsel of record in the co-pending litigation Eli Lilly
`
`& Co. et al. v. Nang Kuang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al., Case. No. 1: l 4-cv-
`
`1647-TWP-DKL (S.D. Ind.) (consolidated). Before consolidation with related
`
`suits on December 29, 2015, this case was under the docket of Eli Lilly & Co. v.
`
`Sandoz Inc., Case No. 1 :14-cv-2008-TWP-DKL (S.D. Ind.). This case is related to
`
`and involves the same patent at issue in this proceeding. As such, I have an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding and have
`
`acquired substantial understanding of the underlying legal and technological issues
`
`at stake in this proceeding. In particular, I have reviewed the patent-at-issue (U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,772,209), the file history of the '209 patent, the Petition (Paper 2),
`
`and all exhibits which accompanied the Petition.
`
`3
`
`Exhibit 1055-00003
`
`

`
`Under penalty of perjury, I declare the above statements as true and accurate
`
`to the best of my recollection. I further state that these statements are made with
`
`the knowledge that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code.
`
`Dated: February 25, 2016
`
`~~dif#f~
`
`BRINKS GILSON & LIONE
`455 North Cityfront Plaza Dr., Suite 3600
`Chicago, Illinois 60611-5599
`Tel: (312) 321-4894
`Fax: (312) 321-4299
`llydigsen@brinksgilson.com
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 1055-00004
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(1), the parties have
`
`agreed to electronic service for all filings in this case. Pursuant to that agreement,
`Petitioner hereby certifies that the foregoing document was served via email upon
`the following parties.
`
`Dov P. Grossman (Reg. No. 72,525)
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`725 Twelfth St. NW
`Washington DC 20005
`Direct Phone: 202-434-5812
`Facsimile: 202-434-5029
`dgrossman@wc.com
`
`David M. Krinsky (Reg. No. 72,339)
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`725 Twelfth St. NW
`Washington DC 20005
`Direct Phone: 202-434-5338
`Facsimile: 202-480-8302
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`
`
`James P. Leeds (Reg. No. 35,241)
`Eli Lilly and Company
`Lilly Corporate Center
`Indianapolis, IN 46285
`Direct Phone: 317-276-1667
`Facsimile: 317-277-6534
`leeds_james@lilly.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ralph J. Gabric
`Ralph J. Gabric (Reg. No. 34,167)
`Bryan T. Richardson, Ph.D. (Reg. No.
`70,572)
`Brinks Gilson & Lione
`NBC Tower – Suite 3600
`455 N. Cityfront Plaza Dr.
`Chicago, Illinois 60611
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 25, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket