throbber
THE
`
`GAMMA
`
`NAIL
`
`FOR
`
`PERITROCHANTERIC
`
`FRACTURES
`
`S. C. HALDER
`
`From
`
`the
`
`Royal
`
`Halifax
`
`Infirmary
`
`fractures.
`in a total
`
`The
`of 421
`
`1985
`
`interfrochanteric
`unstable
`to treat
`The Gamma
`subtrochanteric
`and
`designed
`nail was
`has been
`cadaver
`after
`studies
`was
`used
`clinically
`and
`developed
`device
`February
`since
`are reported.
`freated
`by the third version
`of
`in 123 patients
`The
`patients.
`results
`design
`this
`the dynamic
`screw and
`weight
`closer
`to the calcar
`than does
`The Gamma
`it has greater
`hip
`transmits
`nail
`of 35
`technique
`is used, with an average
`duration
`of operation
`A semi-closed
`mechanical
`sfrength.
`operative
`blood
`loss. Distal
`to maintain
`rotational
`liftie
`can
`be used
`locking
`screws
`stabifity,
`and
`can
`be
`minutes
`and
`the use
`of an image
`intensifier.
`inserted
`without
`little
`satisfactory
`fracture
`union with
`loss
`Results
`showed
`of
`the
`few,
`Operative
`complications
`were
`but
`included
`fractures
`in one
`case, was
`important
`complication,
`seen
`postoperative
`fracture
`end of
`the nail, but
`this healed
`well after
`re-nailing.
`
`of position,
`of
`base
`of
`
`in comminuted
`even
`the greater
`trochanter.
`the
`shaft
`of
`the
`femur
`
`fractures.
`The most
`the distal
`
`at
`
`of
`
`and
`
`the
`was
`
`la)
`
`the
`
`al
`
`or
`
`or
`
`bone
`
`of
`
`head,
`main
`
`a set
`
`and
`screw.
`
`screw
`was
`
`It
`
`studies
`wax
`canal
`in
`
`had
`eight
`
`in
`
`the mark-l
`The
`results
`three
`main
`
`caused
`
`by excessive
`
`to
`
`disengagement
`
`of
`
`the
`
`caused
`
`by
`
`rotation
`
`of
`
`the
`
`modified:
`
`proximally;
`
`subtrochanteric
`and
`intertrochanteric
`Unstable
`problems
`present
`can
`to
`fix
`and
`are
`difficult
`1986;
`Jones
`and
`Kassab
`ment
`(Esser,
`1987 ; Chang
`most
`The
`1987).
`et
`al
`screw
`uses
`a large
`method
`of
`fixation
`aspect
`on the
`lateral
`secured
`to a plate
`the
`This
`the
`disadvantage
`that
`has
`in
`line
`of
`load-bearing.
`Any
`defect
`the
`femur,
`due
`to imperfect
`reduction,
`metastasis,
`means
`that
`a varus
`stress
`the
`fixation
`with
`every
`weight-bearing
`cause
`cutting-out
`of
`the
`screw
`from
`(Davis
`et al 1990)
`or
`failure
`the
`at
`of
`the
`screws
`securing
`the
`plate
`1979; Amis,
`Bromage
`and Larvin
`The
`use
`of
`the
`Zickel
`nail
`objections,
`but
`is
`difficult
`to
`it
`of
`complications,
`as
`fracture
`such
`was
`trochanter.
`Gamma
`nail
`in an attempt
`to overcome
`some
`
`fractures
`in manage-
`Bergman
`et
`common
`current
`in the
`femoral
`head
`ofthe
`upper
`femur.
`plate
`is lateral
`to the
`the medial
`cortex
`of
`comminution
`a
`will
`be
`applied
`to
`step.
`This
`may
`head
`the
`femur
`the
`of
`nail-plate
`junction
`to
`the
`(Waddell
`1987).
`these
`of
`some
`meets
`own
`its
`and
`has
`insert
`greater
`base
`the
`the
`accordingly
`developed
`these
`problems.
`
`of
`
`The
`
`DESIGN
`
`AND
`
`DEVELOPMENT
`
`Gamma
`The
`intramedullary
`femur,
`a
`
`screw
`
`three
`has
`nail
`down
`passed
`rod
`passed
`through
`
`main
`the
`a hole
`
`:
`
`components
`of
`upper
`shaft
`in
`the
`proximal
`
`an
`the
`
`S. C. Halder,
`The
`Royal
`Yorkshire
`
`MB BS, Associate
`Halifax
`Infirmary,
`HXI
`2YP,
`England.
`
`Specialist
`Free
`
`in Orthopaedics
`School
`Lane,
`
`Halifax,
`
`West
`
`Editorial
`$2.00
`1992;
`[Br]
`
`© 1992 British
`030l-620X/92/3398
`J Bone
`Joint
`Surg
`
`340
`
`Society
`
`ofBone
`
`and
`
`Joint
`
`Surgery
`
`74-B
`
`: 340-4.
`
`trochanter,
`greater
`implant;
`of
`the
`due
`deformity
`; and
`screw
`deformity
`shaft.
`implant
`the
`of
`screw
`
`hip
`
`accordingly
`was
`nail was
`reduced;
`was
`extended
`
`the
`into
`inserted
`rod
`the
`part
`the
`of
`rotation
`prevents
`which
`insertion.
`semi-closed
`for
`designed
`after
`produced
`A prototype
`was
`femoral
`of
`the
`made
`of
`shape
`been
`cadavers.
`on
`other
`and
`tested
`cadavers,
`some
`modifications
`design.
`After
`Mark-i
`used
`100
`patients.
`(Fig.
`was
`version
`in general,
`satisfactory
`but
`there
`were
`were,
`complications:
`of
`1) fracture
`medial
`curvature
`2)
`late
`coxa
`vara
`hip
`shoulder
`of
`the
`3)
`external
`rotation
`rod within
`the
`femoral
`Mark-2
`design.
`The
`1) the medial
`curvature
`2)
`the
`shoulder
`ofthe
`and
`the
`3)
`lb).
`
`facility
`
`to use
`
`distal
`
`locking
`
`screws
`
`was
`
`added
`
`(Fig.
`
`distal
`
`of
`
`spiral
`for
`used
`was
`screw
`locking
`The
`and
`length
`the
`control
`to
`fractures,
`subtrochanteric
`for
`disparity
`and
`fractures,
`comminuted
`of
`rotation
`femur
`producing
`and
`the
`nail
`diameter
`the
`between
`modification
`to the
`Another
`of
`rotation.
`poor
`control
`fracture
`compression,
`in
`an
`increase
`screw
`allowed
`through
`the
`head
`its
`penetration
`helping
`to prevent
`nail was
`used
`in
`second-generation
`the
`femur.
`This
`(Bridle
`et al 1991).
`pilot
`centres
`throughout
`Europe
`led to
`these
`clinical
`studies
`Mark-3
`design.
`The
`results
`of
`further
`modifications
`: the
`nail was
`shortened
`by 20 mm,
`to 200 mm,
`and
`nails
`ofthree
`distal
`diameters,
`12, 14 and
`
`hip
`
`of
`19
`
`THE JOURNAL
`
`OF BONE
`
`AND
`
`JOINT
`
`SURGERY
`
`ZIMMER 1043
`Page 1
`
`

`
`THE GAMMA
`
`NAIL
`
`FOR
`
`PERITROCHANTERIC
`
`FRACTURES
`
`341
`
`1(cid:1)
`
`11
`
`- v:(cid:1)-
`
`I,-
`
`- -
`
`(cid:1)-
`
`-
`
`I(cid:1)
`
`-
`
`- -
`
`A
`
`Fig.
`
`1
`
`-(cid:1)
`
`-
`
`C
`
`The
`angle
`Mark
`longer
`similar
`universal
`
`Gamma
`ofthe
`evolution
`of
`the
`shank
`and
`the
`a smoother
`2 (B)
`had
`and
`had
`(220 mm)
`to
`the
`previous
`set
`screw.
`
`and
`
`but
`
`(A) had
`design
`nail. The mark-i
`narrower
`was
`femoral
`neck
`screw
`diameter.
`shank
`curve
`a uniform
`Mark
`interlock.
`provision
`for distal
`(200 mm)
`version
`was
`shorter
`
`a greater
`(arrow).
`It was
`3 (C) was
`and
`had
`a
`
`reamed
`Care
`
`is
`
`cortex
`the
`until
`reamer
`a flexible
`with
`is then
`patients
`in
`to
`over-ream
`is
`required
`not
`engaged.
`far
`as
`femur
`the
`end
`of
`bone.
`The
`proximal
`with
`porotic
`17 mm to accom-
`to
`trochanter
`is
`reamed
`the
`as
`lesser
`A Gamma
`nail
`nail.
`proximal
`part
`of
`the
`modate
`the
`the
`final
`reamer
`than
`diameter
`about
`2 mm less
`shaft
`with
`inserted
`by
`hand
`on
`and
`assembled
`the
`jig
`is
`selected,
`seen
`hole
`is
`on
`the
`the
`of
`lowest
`part
`hip
`screw
`until
`the
`lesser
`trochanter
`or
`level
`image
`intensifier
`to be
`with
`the
`the
`introduction
`the
`the
`inferior
`border
`of
`neck.
`During
`floor
`or
`in slight
`of
`the
`nail
`the
`jig
`is kept
`parallel
`to the
`retroversion.
`A small
`lateral
`incision
`is then made
`at
`the
`of
`level
`of
`the
`introducer
`hole
`the
`hip
`screw
`in thejig
`and
`deepened
`to bone.
`A soft-tissue
`guide
`sleeve
`followed
`by
`a guide
`wire
`is
`inserted.
`the
`The
`position
`of
`lateral
`anteroposterior
`and
`the guide wire
`is removed
`
`checked
`then
`is
`wire
`guide
`is unsatisfactory
`it
`If
`views.
`the nailpartially
`withdrawn
`
`and
`
`on
`
`were
`16 mm,
`use
`been
`in
`cases
`treated
`
`provided.
`since
`May
`in this way
`
`The
`1988
`are
`
`third
`(Fig.
`reported.
`
`version
`ic),
`
`of
`
`the
`the
`
`nail
`first
`
`and
`
`has
`123
`
`PATIENTS
`
`AND
`
`METHODS
`
`(n=10)
`
`(n=12)
`
`of
`
`with
`at
`
`to
`
`(n=15)
`
`(n=6)
`
`5
`
`STABLE
`
`1 & 2.
`
`UNSTABLE
`
`3,
`
`4,
`
`5.
`
`Fig. 2a
`
`The
`and
`are
`
`classification
`(1980)
`Jensen
`2 are
`stable
`; types
`3, 4 and
`those
`of each
`type
`of
`fracture
`
`of intertrochanteric
`5 are
`unstable.
`The
`in the most
`recent
`
`Types
`fractures.
`numbers
`in brackets
`I 23 cases.
`
`1
`
`SPIRAL
`
`#
`
`TRANSVERSE
`
`#
`
`at
`after
`the
`
`of
`
`al 199 1). The
`by traction
`limb
`in
`access
`over
`the
`at
`3.2 mm
`The
`
`fracture
`and
`internal
`a neutral
`or
`to the
`greater
`the
`tip
`of
`the
`correct
`site,
`guide
`wire
`femoral
`shaft
`
`is
`
`a
`
`Fig. 2b
`
`The
`(short
`
`Zickel
`and
`
`(1980)
`long)
`
`classification
`and
`transverse
`
`subtrochanteric
`of
`(proximal
`and
`
`fractures
`types.
`
`distal)
`
`into
`
`spiral
`
`patients
`156
`total
`a
`operatively
`treated
`We
`fractures
`femoral
`or
`subtrochanteric
`intertrochanteric
`until
`January
`1988
`Infirmary
`from May
`Halifax
`the Royal
`and
`eight
`period
`intertrochanteric
`1991
`. During
`this
`25
`methods,
`fractures
`treated
`by other
`subtrochanteric
`were
`not
`was
`in
`the
`the
`Gamma
`nail
`when
`expertise
`of
`use
`available.
`The mean
`those
`treated
`by the Gamma
`age
`of
`nail
`was
`80. 1 years
`100).
`There
`were
`100 women
`(19
`to
`at
`and
`23 men
`with
`a
`follow-up
`of
`least
`one
`year.
`Intertrochanteric
`fractures
`were
`classified
`according
`and
`Jensen
`(1980),
`had
`distribution
`shown
`in Figure
`the
`2. Two
`intertrochanteric
`fractures
`were
`pathological
`and
`fracture
`one
`subtrochanteric
`was
`in Pagetic
`bone.
`Details
`recorded
`were
`of
`all
`patients
`prospectively
`including
`and
`drainage
`blood
`loss,
`transfusion
`required.
`The
`duration
`ofimage
`intensification
`was monitored.
`Patients
`were
`reviewed
`six weeks,
`three
`months,
`six months
`and
`one
`year
`injury,
`with
`clinical
`and
`radiographic
`assessment
`progress
`of
`healing
`and
`of
`complica-
`tions.
`Operative
`reduced
`rotation
`slightly
`trochanter.
`greater
`using
`passed
`
`(Halder
`technique
`an
`orthopaedic
`on
`10#{176}to
`15#{176},with
`of
`adducted
`position
`A small
`incision
`trochanter
`which
`double-action
`far
`as
`the
`
`as
`
`a
`
`VOL.
`
`74-B.
`
`No.
`
`3. MAY
`
`1992
`
`et
`table
`the
`to allow
`is made
`is broached
`drill
`over
`lesser
`trochanter.
`
`a
`
`ZIMMER 1043
`Page 2
`
`(cid:1)
`

`
`342
`
`S. C. HALDER
`
`When
`cannulated
`bone
`length
`
`the
`
`of
`is
`
`they
`
`are
`
`re-insertion.
`and
`rotation
`of
`adjustment
`for
`a
`satisfactory
`is
`guide
`wire
`position
`of
`the
`subchondral
`over
`to reach
`it
`drill
`is passed
`of
`appropriate
`head.
`A hip
`screw
`the
`femoral
`locked
`by a set
`screw.
`and
`then
`introduced
`locking
`screws
`are
`required
`distal
`When
`in a similar
`manner.
`introduced
`be
`cannot
`which
`fracture
`subtrochanteric
`A spiral
`open
`by
`is managed
`closed
`technique
`reduced
`by
`a Gamma
`wiring
`before
`circumferential
`reduction
`and
`that
`the
`way.
`Provided
`in
`the
`usual
`nail
`is
`inserted
`adequate
`reduction
`and
`radiograph
`shows
`postoperative
`nail
`position,
`patients
`are
`allowed
`to walk
`a satisfactory
`with
`full weight-bearing
`soon
`as comfort
`permits.
`
`the
`
`a
`
`as
`
`RESULTS
`
`follow-up
`The mean
`details
`to
`31),
`and
`the
`duration
`of
`operative
`blood
`fracture
`in Table
`Subtrochanteric
`image
`intensifier
`teric
`fractures.
`The
`radiological
`III.
`There
`
`Table
`
`of 123
`21 .7 months
`was
`patients
`in Table
`shown
`are
`of
`these
`intensifier
`time,
`image
`operation,
`the
`three
`types
`for
`given
`loss
`are
`of distal
`locking
`screws.
`as
`II,
`is the
`use
`longer,
`required
`more
`fractures
`took
`time
`bled more
`intertrochan-
`
`(12
`I. The
`and
`of
`
`and
`
`than
`
`results
`no
`
`in 71
`fatigue
`
`cases
`fractures
`
`are
`
`shown
`implant
`
`or
`
`in
`
`were
`
`fractures
`Thirty-eight
`failures.
`there
`In
`22 patients
`position.
`at
`the
`fracture
`compression
`showed
`shortening
`fracture
`case
`of nonunion,
`from one
`in all
`cases,
`including
`fractures
`(Fig.
`3).
`The main
`intra-operative
`iatrogenic
`fractures
`of
`the
`
`of
`
`loss
`no
`with
`healed
`lateral
`as
`as well
`axial
`was
`subtrochanteric
`no
`but
`site,
`4 mm.
`Apart
`than
`of more
`satisfactory
`healing
`there
`was
`with
`severely
`comminuted
`
`those
`
`complications
`of
`the
`greater
`
`small
`were
`trochanter
`
`base
`
`Table
`
`I. Details
`
`of
`
`123
`
`patients
`
`treated
`
`by Gamma
`
`nailing
`
`Fracture
`
`Intertrochanteric
`
`Subfrochanteric
`
`±5D)
`
`Age (years
`Male
`Female
`
`status
`
`Mental
`Normal
`Impaired
`
`Walking
`Unaided
`Stick
`Frame
`Unable
`
`of admission
`Source
`home
`Own
`Old people’s
`Nursing
`home
`Hospital
`
`home
`
`10.57
`
`80.10±
`19
`79
`
`66
`32
`
`54(55.1%)
`(8.2%)
`8
`19 (19.4%)
`17 (17.3%)
`
`48 (49.0%)
`23 (23.5%)
`9
`(9.2%)
`18 (18.4%)
`
`± 13.22
`
`77.96
`5
`20
`
`19
`6
`
`13(52.0%)
`4(16.0%)
`7(28.0%)
`(4.0%)
`1
`
`14 (56.0%)
`5 (20.0%)
`3(12.0%)
`3(12.0%)
`
`Table
`
`II. Operative
`
`details
`
`for 123 patients
`
`treated
`
`by Gamma
`
`nailing
`
`Intertrochanteric
`
`Stable
`(n=22)
`
`Unstable
`(n=76)
`
`SubtrOch*nteriC
`(n=25)
`
`Total
`(n=123)
`
`Age
`
`(years±sD)
`
`79.2±
`
`1 1.6
`
`80.4±
`
`10.2
`
`78.0±
`
`13.2
`
`79.7±
`
`11.2
`
`± 21.8
`
`ofoperation
`Duration
`(mins ± an)
`
`Imageintensifier
`(mins±sD)
`
`Bloodloss
`(ml ±sn)
`
`Distalscrews
`(number
`
`of cases)
`
`28.0±
`
`8.9
`
`30.6±
`
`13.9
`
`57.6 ± 32.8
`
`35.6
`
`4.3±1.4
`
`5.4±3.0
`
`7.6±3.0
`
`5.7±3.0
`
`114.1±88.9
`
`153.2±99.3
`
`285.6±172.7
`
`173.1±130.4
`
`1
`
`ii
`
`ii
`
`23
`
`Table
`review
`
`Radiological
`III.
`at 18 months
`
`results
`
`in the 71 patients
`
`who
`
`survived
`
`and were
`
`available
`
`for
`
`Intertrochanteric
`
`Stable
`
`Unstable
`
`SubtrOchanteriC
`
`No
`
`change
`
`in position
`
`Compressionbyito4mm
`
`Fracture
`
`of greater
`
`trochanter
`
`Varus
`
`angulation
`
`Screw
`
`cut-out
`
`Postoperative
`
`shaft
`
`fracture
`
`Nonunion
`
`ii
`
`5
`
`0
`
`1
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`17
`
`15
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`10
`
`2
`
`0
`
`0
`
`1
`
`1
`
`0
`
`Total
`
`38
`
`22
`
`3
`
`3
`
`2
`
`2
`
`1
`
`THE JOURNAL
`
`OF BONE AND JOINT
`
`SURGERY
`
`ZIMMER 1043
`Page 3
`
`

`
`THE GAMMA
`
`NAIL FOR PERITROCHANTERIC
`
`FRACTURES
`
`343
`
`Comminuted
`technique
`
`and
`intertrochanteric
`combined
`distal
`locking
`screws
`to maintain
`
`subtrochanteric
`rotation
`and
`
`fracture,
`length.
`
`and
`
`showing
`
`fixation
`
`by a Gamma
`
`nail
`
`using
`
`a closed
`
`Fig.
`
`3
`
`seen
`the
`There
`
`in three
`femur
`was
`
`but
`cases,
`was
`adequately
`a mild
`coxa
`vara
`
`did
`
`were
`These
`operation.
`during
`because
`healing
`not
`influence
`implant.
`by
`the
`immobilised
`cases.
`in three
`deformity
`femoral
`the
`through
`cut
`screw
`the
`hip
`cases
`In two
`revision
`from a previous
`after
`: one was
`superiorly
`head
`in
`a pathological
`fracture
`was
`the
`other
`;
`and
`plate
`pin
`to a metastasis
`from carcinoma
`of
`the
`breast.
`Two
`due
`patients
`sustained
`postoperative
`fractures
`at
`the
`lower
`end
`ofthe
`prosthesis.
`One
`had
`penetration
`ofthe
`anterior
`cortex
`of
`the
`femur
`during
`operation
`; the
`other
`fell
`out
`bed
`six weeks
`and
`sustained
`a spiral
`fracture
`of
`femur.
`Both
`were
`treated
`by
`the
`insertion
`of
`a
`version
`of
`the Gamma
`nail with
`results
`(Fig.
`good
`There
`were
`no cases
`ofdeep
`infection,
`two
`superficial
`The
`infections
`settled
`with
`oral
`antibiotic
`therapy.
`age
`postoperative
`mortality
`was
`high,
`as expected
`in this
`group
`of
`patients,
`12.2%
`within
`one month
`and
`30.1%
`within
`one
`year,
`there was
`the usual
`range
`of medical
`and
`complications
`including
`pneumonia,
`congestive
`heart
`failure,
`deep-vein
`thrombosis
`and myocardial
`infarction.
`
`at
`
`of
`the
`long
`4).
`
`and
`
`fractures
`peritrochanteric
`For
`and
`Gibson
`fixation
`(Bannister
`by a variety
`has
`been
`replaced
`give
`satisfactory
`screw
`plates.
`These
`but
`fractures,
`in unstable
`fractures,
`fragment
`medial
`has
`been
`impaction
`is
`there
`with
`shortening
`(Templeton
`femur
`and
`Saunders
`et
`al
`1990).
`Davis
`This
`shortens
`arm of
`the
`lever
`abductors.
`is
`transmitted
`the
`calcar,
`
`of
`
`femur
`the
`; Esser
`1983
`of dynamic
`results
`where
`reduced
`the
`of
`; Chang
`leg
`and
`of
`the
`a plate
`
`1979
`the
`Most
`and
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`not
`
`hip
`down
`
`VOL.
`
`74-B, No.
`
`3, MAY
`
`1992
`
`pin
`
`plate
`and
`1986)
`al
`et
`compression
`in most
`stable
`the
`postero-
`anatomically,
`the
`neck
`of
`et al 1987;
`reduces
`the
`body-weight
`supporting
`
`Fig.
`
`4
`
`Postoperative
`intertrochanteric
`a long
`version
`position.
`
`fracture
`spiral
`by
`fracture
`the Gamma
`
`of
`
`to
`
`due
`a Gamma
`nail,
`and
`
`an
`fixation
`after
`fall
`a
`for
`nail was
`changed
`nail. The
`in good
`both
`fractures
`healed
`
`of
`
`or
`
`some
`be
`must
`screw
`nail
`either
`therefore
`is
`It
`line.
`weight-bearing
`1986 ; Chang
`et al
`tension
`(Esser
`1987).
`An
`intramedullary
`device
`calcar,
`subject
`to
`less
`tension,
`
`et
`
`to the
`lateral
`distance
`considerable
`under
`; Friedl
`al
`1987
`close
`is
`very
`and
`is more
`
`et
`
`al
`the
`to
`stable.
`
`ZIMMER 1043
`Page 4
`
`

`
`with
`in patients
`are
`important
`
`It must
`wire.
`of
`its anterior
`to its
`tip.
`of
`abnormal
`
`or
`
`porotic
`(Bridle
`
`enter
`third
`
`the
`and
`
`excessive
`
`and
`phase
`considerations
`1991):
`the
`guide
`of
`junction
`the
`lateral
`just
`presence
`shaft.
`malaligned
`
`drill
`
`holes
`
`before
`
`the
`than
`nail
`ofthe
`by twisting
`
`reamer.
`by partial
`it
`in the
`
`not
`
`learning
`the
`during
`following
`the
`bone,
`l99l;Halderetal
`etal
`1) Exact
`placement
`greater
`trochanter
`posterior
`two-thirds,
`2) Special
`care
`in the
`curvature
`of
`the
`femoral
`3) No
`attempt
`to
`correct
`inserting
`distal
`screws.
`2 mm narrower
`4) Selection
`of
`a nail
`5) Correction
`alignment
`ofrotational
`withdrawal
`and
`re-introduction,
`engaged
`position.
`
`at
`
`344
`
`S. C. HALDER
`
`as
`
`nail
`
`the
`et
`
`(Kuok-
`Czitrom
`Zickel
`1987)
`use
`
`these
`
`in
`
`to
`no
`In
`
`most
`even
`comminution
`compression
`
`in
`
`there
`porotic
`poor
`bone
`the
`fracture
`
`Enders
`the
`such
`devices
`Intramedullary
`; Waddell,
`1986
`and
`Lauttamus
`kanen,
`Korkala
`al
`1988)
`and
`et
`1987;
`Sernbo
`and
`Simmons
`al
`; Bergman
`1977
`and
`Anderson
`nail
`(Ashby
`their
`make
`difficulties
`tried
`but
`technical
`have
`been
`1980).
`(Waddell
`1979; Ross
`and Kurtz
`uncommon
`of
`The Gamma
`nail
`allows
`semi-closed
`fixation
`fractures,
`facilitating
`union
`without
`major
`changes
`proximal
`femoral
`anatomy.
`Some
`comminuted
`fractures
`(Jensen
`types
`4 and
`showed
`an
`increased
`tendency
`5)
`varus
`deformity,
`but
`in
`cases
`was
`subsequent
`displacement
`very
`bone.
`some
`cases, marked
`and
`quality
`resulted
`in
`excessive
`at
`and
`mild
`varus
`deformity.
`without
`be achieved
`Stability
`can
`comminuted
`of
`the
`posteromedial
`rotation
`control
`of
`locking
`provides
`difficult
`subtrochanteric
`the
`especially
`screws
`can
`be
`inserted
`distal
`3). The
`intensification.
`image
`123 cases
`reported,
`being
`fracture
`did
`influence
`which
`To
`minimise
`this
`and
`
`tion
`distal
`fractures,
`type
`(Fig.
`the
`use
`of
`In the
`commonest
`the
`trochanter,
`outcome.
`
`anatomical
`fragment,
`in
`
`reduc-
`and
`unstable
`spiral
`without
`
`complications
`around
`the
`other
`
`few,
`were
`greater
`the
`or
`final
`course
`complications
`
`not
`
`is grateful
`author
`The
`Mr W.
`J. Nicol,
`Oyston,
`the
`consultant
`orthopaedic
`patients,
`and
`to the
`surgeons
`clinical
`trials.
`
`to Mr
`Mr
`
`J. K.
`Mr
`J. G. Gill, Mr B. M. Flood,
`J. A. Chapman
`and Mr C.
`J. Chadwick,
`surgeons
`who
`allowed
`me
`to
`treat
`their
`at 19 European
`centres
`who
`undertook
`
`I am also grateful
`colleagues
`at
`Calderdale
`Orthopaedic
`Secretary
`Computer
`Consultant,
`International,
`London,
`
`to Mr M. Morris, Medical
`Health
`Authority,
`the Royal
`Halifax
`at
`Calderdale
`College,
`England,
`who made
`
`and
`Photographer
`S. Maddock,
`Mrs
`G.
`Infirmary,
`and Mr D. Hull,
`Halifax,
`and Howmedica
`this
`device.
`
`his
`
`The
`professional
`to the
`subject
`
`author
`use
`of
`
`or will
`received
`from
`a commercial
`this
`article.
`
`receive
`party
`
`for
`benefits
`related
`directly
`
`personal
`or
`indirectly
`
`or
`
`Amis
`
`JD, Larvin M. Fatigue
`screw-plate
`device
`after
`
`fracture
`bone
`
`sliding
`a femoral
`of
`union.
`Biomaterials
`
`REFERENCES
`
`device
`the Zickel
`J Nail Med Assoc
`
`for
`1977
`
`a malunited
`; 69:623-4.
`
`plate
`nail
`Jewett
`? : a randomised
`1983;
`65-B:2l8.
`
`or AO dynamic
`prospective
`
`screw
`hip
`controlled
`
`Jensen
`
`und
`
`A, Boriana
`nail. Howmedica
`trochanteric
`fractures.
`
`5,
`
`KS. Operative
`Leung
`1991.
`International,
`Acta Ortliop
`Scand
`
`I I
`
`T. Belastbarkeit
`M, Ruf W, Mlschkowsky
`W, Manner
`FriedI W, Schult
`145
`pertrochanterer
`osteotomien
`nach
`und
`verformung
`instabiler
`degrees
`: winkel-plattenosteosynthese
`endernagelung.
`Unfall-
`chirurgie 1987; 13:1-7.
`Halder
`SC,
`Radioed
`P, Grosse
`technique.
`Gamma
`locking
`JS. Classification
`of
`1980; 51 :803-10.
`Kuokkanen
`H, Korkala
`fractures
`: a review
`105:46-8.
`
`of
`nailing
`L. Ender
`Arch Orthop
`Trauma
`
`trochanteric
`1986;
`Surg
`
`0,
`of
`
`Lauttamus
`73
`cases.
`
`N.
`
`Ross
`
`PM,
`fixation:
`
`Kurtz
`acase
`
`Sernbo
`
`I,
`Johnell
`fractures
`compression
`1297-303.
`
`of
`
`subsequent
`147:131-3.
`
`1980;
`
`to Zickel
`
`nail
`
`fracture
`Subcapital
`report.
`C/in Orthop
`intertrochanteric
`JA. Unstable
`0, Gentz
`CF, Nilsson
`compared
`with
`Ender
`pins
`the
`hip : treatment
`with
`1988 ;
`J Bone
`Joint
`Surg
`hip
`screw.
`[Am]
`70-A:
`
`a
`
`Templeton
`femur
`JP.
`Waddell
`patients.
`JP,
`Waddell
`Czitrom
`A, Simmons
`J Trauma
`femur.
`proximal
`Subtrochanteric
`RE.
`1980; 11:555-68.
`
`EA. A review
`Saunders
`iS,
`the Zickel
`nail.
`with
`treated
`Subtrochanteric
`fractures
`J Trauma
`19:582-92.
`
`1979;
`
`fractures
`of
`C/in Orthop
`of
`the
`femur
`
`proximal
`in the
`1979;
`141 :213-6.
`: a review
`of 130
`
`EH.
`1987;
`femoral
`
`Ender
`27:911-6.
`fractures.
`
`nailing
`
`in fractures
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Orthop
`
`C/in North
`
`Am
`
`Bromage
`AA,
`compression
`1987; 8:153-7.
`Asbby ME,
`use of
`JC. The
`Anderson
`femur
`fracture.
`subtrochanteric
`AGF.
`GC, Gibson
`Bannister
`fractures
`trochanteric
`for
`trial.
`Surg[Br]
`JBoneJoint
`GD, WinqUiSt
`RA, Mayo
`Bergman
`: fixation
`fracture
`of the
`femur
`Surg[Am]
`1987; 69-A:l032-40.
`
`KA, Hansen
`ST.
`using
`the Zickel
`
`Subtrochantenc
`nail.
`J Bone
`
`Joint
`
`Bridle
`
`FT.
`AD, Bircher M, Calvert
`SH,
`Patel
`of the
`femur
`: a randomised
`fractures
`teric
`Nail
`and
`dynamic
`of
`the Gamma
`1991 ; 73-B:330-4.
`[Br]
`
`the
`
`hip
`
`of
`
`Fixation
`prospective
`J Bone
`screw.
`
`intertrochan-
`comparison
`Joint
`Surg
`
`JD, Kummer
`Zuckerman
`Chang WS,
`of
`anatomic
`reduction
`evaluation
`in
`unstable
`intertrochanteric
`osteotomy
`1987; 225:141-6.
`TRC,
`JL,
`Sher
`fractures
`: mechanical
`Surg[Br]
`1990;
`72-B
`
`Davis
`
`Horaman
`failure
`:26-31.
`
`et
`A,
`after
`
`Intertrochanteric
`a].
`internal
`fixation.
`
`femoral
`J Bone
`Joint
`
`FJ,
`
`Fraukel
`versus
`
`VH.
`medial
`fractures.
`
`Biomechanial
`displacement
`C/in
`Orthop
`
`Easer MP, Kassab
`a randomised
`with
`the
`dynamic
`B :557-60.
`
`Trochanteric
`Jones DHA.
`JY,
`prospective
`trial
`comparing
`J Bone
`Joint
`hip
`
`screw.
`
`femur:
`ofthe
`fractures
`the
`Jewett
`nail-plate
`Surg
`[Br]
`1986;
`
`68-
`
`Zickel
`
`THE JOURNAL
`
`OF BONE
`
`AND
`
`JOINT
`
`SURGERY
`
`ZIMMER 1043
`Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket