throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ARISTA NETWORKS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00309
`Patent 7,224,668
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SEAL UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.14
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00309
`Attorney Docket No: 40963-0006IP3
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14, 42.54(a) Petitioner Arista Networks, Inc.,
`
`(“Arista”) hereby submits this Motion To Seal portions of its demonstrative
`
`exhibits, which are being filed concurrently herewith. Specifically, Arista moves
`
`to file under seal those portions of its demonstratives that disclose information
`
`designated by Patent Owner as for “the Board and Parties’ Eyes Only” under the
`
`Default Protective Order in connection with Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal (Paper
`
`No. 20), filed concurrently with the Patent Owner response. This motion does not
`
`seek to designate any new information as confidential. Patent Owner does not
`
`oppose this motion.
`
`The Board may seal documents where there is “good cause” that “strike[s] a
`
`balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`
`information.” The Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756,48760 (August
`
`14, 2012). On September 29, 2016, Patent Owner filed its Patent Owner Response
`
`and, concurrently therewith, filed a Motion To Seal portions of the Patent Owner
`
`Response and certain exhibits thereto pursuant to the Default Protective Order
`
`(Paper Nos. 19, 20). Patent Owner redacted portions of its Patent Owner Response
`
`and designated exhibits 2008-2012, 2046, and 2047 as for “the Board and Parties’
`
`Eyes Only,” contending that those exhibits and related portions of the Patent
`
`Owner Response contained Patent Owner’s financial and technical confidential
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00309
`Attorney Docket No: 40963-0006IP3
`business information. On February 1, 2016, in connection with the filing of
`
`Arista’s Reply to the Patent Owner Response, Arista filed a Motion To Seal those
`
`portions of its Reply discussing the materials that were the subject of Patent
`
`Owner’s Motion To Seal. The Board has not yet issued a decision on the parties’
`
`previous Motions To Seal.
`
`Arista’s demonstrative exhibits address arguments by Patent Owner that rely
`
`on Patent Owner’s confidential information. Thus, the demonstrative exhibits
`
`disclose information subject to Patent Owner’s confidentiality designations.
`
`Accordingly, consistent with the parties’ previous Motions To Seal, Petitioner
`
`moves that the Board seal those portions of its demonstratives at least until such
`
`time as the Board rules on the previously-filed Motions To Seal, in order to
`
`preserve the confidentiality of that information pending a decision on Patent
`
`Owner’s initial motion. Arista does not request that any other portions of its
`
`demonstrative exhibits be sealed.
`
`In accordance with the Default Protective Order, Petitioner is submitting
`
`herewith both a sealed version of its demonstrative exhibits and a redacted, public
`
`version of the same demonstrative exhibits.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00309
`Attorney Docket No: 40963-0006IP3
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Lauren A. Degnan
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`Lauren A. Degnan, Reg. No. 40,584
`Steven R. Katz, Reg. No. 43,706
`Adam R. Shartzer, Reg. No. 57,264
`Ralph A. Phillips (admitted pro hac vice)
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 3, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Customer Number 26171
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Telephone: (612) 337-2509
`Facsimile: (612) 288-9696
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00309
`Attorney Docket No: 40963-0006IP3
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(4), the undersigned certifies that on March 3,
`
`2017, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Motion to Seal Under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.14, was provided via email, to the Petitioner by serving the email
`
`correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`Robert Greene Sterne
`Jon E. Wright
`Daniel S. Block
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Email: lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`Email: rsterne-PTAB@skgf.com
`Email: jwright-PTAB@skgf.com
`Email: dblock-PTAB@skgf.com
`Email: ptab@skgf.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Edward G. Faeth/
`
`Edward G. Faeth
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(202) 626-6420
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket