throbber
Determination of 5-ASA in Whole or Partial Mesalamine Delayed-Release Tablets Recovered
`From Fecal Samples of Healthy Volunteers:
`Do 5-ASA Delivery Systems Matter in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis?
`
`Poster Number
`
`Alan Safdi, MD • Michael Safdi, MD
`Greater Cincinnati Gastroenterology Associates, Cincinnati, OH
`
`ABSTRACT
`Purpose: Mesalamine delayed-release tablets (ASACOL®; Procter and Gamble
`Pharmaceuticals) have a coating of methacrylic acid polymer B (EUDRAGIT S) that
`allows release of mesalamine to the proximal colon with low systemic absorption
`(approximately 28%). This coating is pH-sensitive and dissolves at a sustained pH level
`of 7 or higher. Fragments of ASACOL tablets have been observed in fecal specimens,
`but the fragments were believed to be shells left after the 5-aminosalycilic acid
`(5-ASA) had been released. The current study was conducted to determine the amount
`of 5-ASA in whole and partial mesalamine tablets recovered from the fecal samples of
`healthy volunteers who received mesalamine therapy.
`
`Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers received two 400-mg mesalamine tablets
`orally twice a day for 4 days. After observing the presence of whole and partial
`mesalamine tablets in fecal specimens, the investigators recovered the tablets and
`fragments for further analysis. The tablets and fragments recovered from fecal
`specimens were photographed, crushed, and added to 20 mL 0.1 M sodium
`phosphate (pH 6.0) and 80 mL absolute methanol. After resting at room temperature
`for 4 hours, 40 mL of the solution was placed in a centrifuge for 10 minutes.
`Three 10-mL aliquots of supernatant were removed, frozen, and sent to a laboratory to
`be assayed for 5-ASA with a lower limit of quantification of 2000 ng/mL.
`
`Results: Of 30 volunteers, 27 (90%) provided fecal samples. Of these, 15 volunteers
`(55%) presented with at least 1 mesalamine tablet or fragment in at least 1 fecal
`sample.
`
`No. of Volunteers (%)
`
`No. Specimens Containing Mesalamine
`Tablets or Fragments (Total)
`
`11 (40)
`
`3 (11)
`
`1 (4)
`
`1 (11)
`
`2 (6)
`
`4 (4)
`
`Total Volunteers 15 (55)
`
`Total Specimens 21
`
`All tablets and fragments recovered had detectable 5-ASA. Mean recovery was 97.2 ±
`47.1 mg per tablet/fragment-approximately 24% of an intact tablet.
`
`Conclusions: Fifty-five percent of healthy volunteers who received oral mesalamine
`delayed-release tablets over 4 days of treatment excreted whole or partial tablets in at
`least 1 fecal specimen. Because all tablets and fragments recovered had
`detectable 5-ASA, it is clear that the recovered tablets and fragments were not just
`physical matrices, inert shells, or other excipients. Mean recovery was 97.2 ± 47.1 mg
`per tablet/fragment-approximately 24% of an intact mesalamine tablet. Only visually
`detectable fragments were measured in this study; additional undetectable fragments
`could have been present. The actual percentage of unreleased mesalamine may be
`higher than reported here, representing an important fraction of the daily
`mesalamine dose.
`
`Background
`Mesalamine acts topically in the colon to reduce inflammation associated with
`inflammatory bowel disease. To achieve maximum effectiveness in the treatment of
`ulcerative colitis (UC), mesalamine must reach the colon intact. pH-dependent delayed-
`release mesalamine (Asacol®; Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals) tablets have a
`methacrylic acid polymer B coating (Eudragit S) designed to dissolve at a sustained pH
`level of 7 or higher, which is generally found in the distal ileum and colon. However, pH
`levels vary widely throughout the colon, and in as many as 25% of healthy individuals, pH
`levels do not reach 7 in any section of the gastrointestinal tract (Figure 1).
`
`9
`
`4 11
`
`3
`2
`1
`0
`
`Median
`10th Percentile
`25th Percentile
`75th Percentile
`-s- 90th Percentile
`
`Sto Duo Pro Mid Dis Cec1Asc Ira Des RIS Fec
`
`Colonic Delivery
`
`Figure 1. pH profile of the gastrointestinal tract in healthy volunteers as measured by a radiotelemetry device,
`shown as percentage of all pH values by intraluminal location of the capsule. Sto=stomach; Duo=duodenum;
`Pro=proximal small intestine; Mid=mid small intestine; Dis=distal small intestine; Cec=cecum; Asc=ascending
`colon; Tra=transverse colon; Des=descending colon; R/S=sigmoid colon or rectum; Fec=feces. From
`Fallingborg et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1989;3:605-613. With permission from Blackwell Publishing.
`
`In patients with active UC, pH levels may be even lower, dropping to as low as 2.3 in
`the cecum and transverse colon. These variances in pH levels may result in incomplete
`dissolution of pH-dependent tablets, reducing the amount of active drug available in the
`colon. Patients who respond poorly to pH-dependent delayed-release mesalamine may
`have an improved response rate with an agent that delivers a higher percentage of 5-ASA
`directly to the colon (Figure 2).
`
`Figure 2. Drug delivery throughout the gastrointestinal tract.
`
`Objective
`To determine the amount of 5-ASA in whole and partial mesalamine tablets recovered
`from the fecal samples of healthy volunteers who received mesalamine therapy.
`
`Methods
`• Patients: 30 healthy volunteers
`
`• Treatment: Each patient received two 400-mg pH-dependent delayed-release
`mesalamine tablets by mouth
`
`• Duration: 4 days
`
`• Analysis of excreted tablets and fragments:
`
`- Although not part of the original protocol, we observed the presence of tablets and
`fragments in stool samples and chose to further examine this interesting finding.
`
`- After the presence of whole or partial tablets was observed in fecal specimens, the tablets
`and fragments were recovered for further analysis.
`
`- Stool specimens were collected during the 4-day treatment period as part of routine blood,
`urine, and fecal sample collection.
`
`- All stool samples were collected and analyzed separately.
`
`- Tablets and fragments were photographed, removed from the feces, and refrigerated in
`sealed plastic bags (Figures 3a and 3b).
`
`Figures 3a and 3b. Examples of pH-dependent delayed-release mesalamine tablets and fragments recovered
`from stool samples collected from healthy volunteers. Volunteers received two 400-mg delayed-release
`mesalamine tablets by mouth for 4 days.
`
`- Tablets were crushed and added to 20 mL 0.1 M sodium phosphate (pH 6.0) plus 80 mL
`absolute methanol, mixed thoroughly, and allowed to stand at ambient temperature for
`4 hours.
`
`- The solution was mixed thoroughly, and 40 mL was placed in a centrifuge for 10 minutes.
`
`- Three 10-mL aliquots of supernatant were removed, added to capped test tubes, frozen at
`-70°C, and shipped frozen to a laboratory to be assayed for 5-ASA with a lower limit of
`quantification of 2000 ng/mL (13.06 pM).
`Results
`• Ninety percent of the volunteers (27) provided fecal samples.
`
`• Of these, 55% (15 volunteers) presented with at least 1 mesalamine tablet or fragment
`in at least 1 fecal sample.
`
`No. Specimens
`Containing Mesalamine
`Tablets or Fragments
`
`No. Volunteers (%)
`
`Total No. Specimens
`Containing
`Mesalamine Tablets
`or Fragments*
`
`1
`
`2
`
`4
`
`Total
`
`11 (40)
`
`3 (11)
`
`1 (4)
`
`15 (55)
`
`11
`
`6
`
`4
`
`21
`
`No. specimens x no. patients.
`
`• All whole and partial tablets had detectable levels of 5-ASA.
`
`• Mean 5-ASA recovered per tablet or fragment was 97.2 ± 47.1 mg, approximately 24%
`of the amount in an intact tablet.
`
`Discussion
`Our finding that 55% of healthy volunteers excreted whole or partial tablets with
`detectable levels of 5-ASA-approximately 24% of an intact mesalamine tablet-is
`noteworthy. Because we only measured visually detectable fragments in this study,
`additional undetectable fragments may have been present. The actual percentage of
`unreleased mesalamine may be higher than reported here, representing an important
`fraction of the daily mesalamine dose.
`
`The pH-dependent delivery mechanism of delayed-release mesalamine tablets may
`contribute to the incomplete release of mesalamine in the colon. The polymer coating
`begins dissolving at a sustained pH level of 7, which is found in the distal ileum and
`colon. However, pH levels in the gastrointestinal tract vary, and in some healthy
`individuals, pH levels do not reach 7 in any section of the gastrointestinal tract.
`
`Azo-bonded prodrugs are not dependent on pH levels. The compounds undergo
`azo-reduction in the colon to release the 5-ASA molecule. In the case of balsalazide,
`99% of the 5-ASA is delivered to the colon intact.
`
`The release of 5-ASA proximal to the colon from pH-dependent delayed-release
`mesalamine tablets results in systemic absorption, leading to serum levels of 5-ASA
`4.5 times higher than after administration of equimolar doses of balsalazide.
`(Figure 4). Premature absorption of 5-ASA reduces the amount of active drug that
`reaches the colon.
`
`Figure 4. Plasma 5-ASA and N-acetyl-5-ASA levels at 2 weeks in patients with ulcerative colitis who received
`balsalazide 2.25 or 6.75 g/day or pH-dependent delayed-release mesalamine 2.4 g/day. *p=0.01 vs Asacol.
`tp=0.018 vs Asacol. •*Colazal® is a registered trademark of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. From Levine et al. Am J
`Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1398-1407. With permission from Blackwell Publishing.
`
`• In direct comparisons of balsalazide and pH-dependent delayed-release mesalamine
`for the treatment of UC, balsalazide was more effective earlier in the treatment process
`than pH-dependent delayed-release mesalamine in terms of clinical response and
`complete remission. It is believed that azo-bonded delivery systems such as
`balsalazide provide a more reliable mechanism to deliver 5-ASA directly to the colon.
`
`• Our finding of whole and partial tablets with detectable levels of 5-ASA suggests the
`pH-dependent drug delivery mechanism of delayed-release mesalamine results in
`incompletely dissolved tablets and inadequate delivery of 5-ASA to the colon. Azo-
`bonded delivery systems such as balsalazide may be effective salvage therapy for
`patients with UC who respond poorly to or are intolerant of pH-dependent delayed-
`release mesalamine.
`
`
`
`1111 Presented at the 70th Annual American College of Gastroenterology Meeting
`October 28-November 1, 2005; Honolulu, Hawaii
`
`References: Asacol [package insert]. Cincinnati, OH: Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals; March 2004. • Colazal [package insert]. Morrisville, NC: Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc; April 2005. • Fallingborg J, Christensen LA, Ingeman-Nielsen M, Jacobsen BA, Abildgaard K, Rasmussen HH. pH-profile and regional transit times of the normal gut measured by a radiotelemetry device. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1989;3:605-613. • Fallingborg J, Christensen LA,
`Jacobsen BA, Rasmussen SN. Very low intraluminal colonic pH in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1989-1993. • Green JRB, Lobo AJ, Holdsworth CD, et al. Balsalazide is more effective and better tolerated than mesalamine in the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1998;114:15-22. • Hanauer SB. Medical therapy of ulcerative colitis. Lancet 1993;342:412-417. • Levine DS, Riff DS, Pruitt R, et al. A randomized,
`double blind, dose-response comparison of balsalazide (6.75 g), balsalazide (2.25 g), and mesalamine (2.4 g) in the treatment of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Am I Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1398-1407. • Nugent SG, Kumar D, Rampton DS, Evans OF. Intestinal lumina! pH in inflammatory bowel disease: possible determinants and implications for therapy with aminosalicylates and other drugs. Gut 2001;48:571-577. • Patel DG, Das KM. An open-
`label comparison of COLAZAL® (balsalazide disodium) and US Asacol® (mesalamine) in patients with ulcerative colitis. Poster presented at: Digestive Disease Week; May 17-22, 2003; Orlando, FL. • Pruitt R, Hanson J, Safdi M, et al. Balsalazide is superior to mesalamine in the time to improvement of signs and symptoms of acute mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3078-3086.
`
`SALIXN00012323
`
`Dr. Falk Ex. 2030
`GeneriCo v. Dr. Falk IPR2016-00297
`Page 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket