throbber
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20 (Suppl. 4): 97-101.
`
`Review article: the long-term management of ulcerative colitis
`
`S. B. HANAUER
`Section of Gastroenterology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
`
`SUMMARY
`
`After the induction of remission, the second priority of
`therapy for ulcerative colitis is sustained clinical remis-
`sion. defined as the absence of inflammatory symptoms
`(diarrhoea, bleeding, rectal urgency) and the mainten-
`ance of an intact mucosa, with the absence of ulcers.
`friability or significant granularity at endoscopy.The
``optimal' maintenance strategy will depend on the
`therapy needed to induce remission. Thus, the trans-
`ition from induction to maintenance therapy will be
`determined by the intensity of acute therapy necessary
`to induce remission and the duration of therapy
`required to complete the resolution of clinical symp-
`toms. There are few controlled clinical trials pertaining
`to maintenance after each induction regimen. However.
`experience dictates that aminosalicylates are efficacious
`after aminosalicylate-induced remissions, that steroids
`
`should be tapered according to the time required to
`induce remission, that patients requiring ciclosporin
`will benefit from the addition of long-term immuno-
`modulation with azathioprine or mercaptopurine, and
`that many patients with distal colitis who require
`topical mesalazine (mesalamine) will continue to need
`topical therapy to maintain remission, albeit at reduced
`frequency.The expectations for maintenance therapy
`require patient adherence to the prescribed treatment
`regimen. Patients require education with regard to the
`long-term goals of maintenance therapy (e.g. preven-
`tion of relapse, reduction of long-term complications of
`disease activity or risks of acute therapy with steroids),
`and should be warned against the use of nonsteroidal
`anti-inflammatory drugs and cautioned about the
`cessation of smoking, when applicable, due to potential
`risks of relapse or chronic activity.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Ulcerative colitis is a chronic, medically incurable, but
`maintainable, condition. At any point in time, over 50%
`of a patient population with ulcerative colitis will be in
`medical remission.' The goals of maintenance therapy
`are, first and foremost, to maintain remission, but also
`to sustain the quality of life for patients, prevent
`complications of long-term disease activity or medical
`therapy and, when necessary in a minority of patients,
`to optimize the timing of surgical intervention.
`Despite many years of research and clinical trials in
`ulcerative colitis, there has yet to be a standardized
`
`Correspondence to: Professor S. B. Hanauer, University of Chicago, Section
`of Gastroenterology, 5758 South Maryland Avenue — MC 9028, DCAM
`Room 6601. Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
`E-mail: shanauer@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
`
`definition of 'remission'. A working definition according
`to the Food and Drug Administration draft guidelines
`includes: the absence of inflammatory symptoms
`(inflammatory diarrhoea, bleeding, rectal urgency or
`the passage of mucopus).2 This also includes the
`exclusion of patients with irritable bowel symptoms.
`The definition also requires endoscopic evidence of the
``regeneration' of an intact mucosa without ulcers,
`granularity or significant friability. Although histolog-
`ical findings are not typically used in clinical practice, a
`clinical trial, or regulatory definition of histological
`remission, would include the absence of crypt abscesses.
`In observational studies, such pathological improve-
`ment has been associated with improved outcomes (e.g.
`reduced risk of clinical relapse).3 An important clinical
`symptom of remission in ulcerative colitis is the ability
`to pass gas (flatus) without requiring the use of a toilet.
`
`© 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
`
`97
`
`SALIXN00012373
`
`Dr. Falk Ex. 2010
`GeneriCo v. Dr. Falk IPR2016-00297
`Page 1
`
`

`
`98 S. B. HANAUER
`
`This ability assumes that the rectum has regained its
`normal compliance, and can be a useful clinical tool in
`assessing patient responses.
`To date, only two classes of medication have been
`demonstrated to prevent relapse in ulcerative colitis: the
`aminosalicylates and purine antimetabolites (azathiop-
`rine and mercaptopurine).4 There is some clinical trial
`experience with probiotics and clinical experience with
`nicotine replacement or resumption of smoking. which
`may also provide a role in the maintenance of remission
`in ulcerative colitis. When considering these therapeutic
`options, the therapy used to induce remission, the
`response of patients to previous treatments and their
`history of relapse and adherence, duration of remission
`and the extent of mucosal disease are important
`factors.5 However, the most important consideration
`prior to initiating maintenance therapy for ulcerative
`colitis is that the patient completed induction therapy
`before 'withdrawing' to maintenance treatment. Failure
`to complete the induction of remission will ensure the
`failure of maintenance therapy.6 A final consideration is
`the distinction between steroid dependence and main-
`tenance therapy. Steroid dependence implies the failure
`of an individual patient to taper off steroids without
`disease recurrence. In contrast, maintenance therapy
`pertains to a population of patients for whom therapy
`prevents relapse.6
`
`AMINOSALICYLATES
`
`Sulfasalazine has been used for nearly 40 years as
`maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. Cochrane
`analyses have demonstrated that sulfasalazine can
`prevent the relapse of ulcerative colitis in 65-80% of
`patients, is more effective than olsalazine or mesalazine
`(mesalamine) and is associated with a dose-response.7
`However, the dose-response for sulfasalazine in ulcer-
`ative colitis has been compromised by dose-related side-
`effects. Therefore, optimal dosing may not be possible in
`patients with nausea, headache, arthralgia or sulpha-
`related hypersensitivity.
`In contrast with the documented dose-response for
`sulfasalazine as a maintenance agent in ulcerative
`colitis, there are fewer available studies assessing the
`dose-response for mesalazine formulations. Most of the
`mesalazine formulations have been compared with
`sulfasalazine and, in individual trials, there have been
`numerical, but not statistical, differences in favour of
`sulfasalazine.7. 8 However, one trial with Pentasa
`
`demonstrated a nonstatistically significant advantage
`for the mesalazine formulation compared with sulfasal-
`azine.9 The only placebo-controlled. dose-ranging trial
`of mesalazine as maintenance therapy for ulcerative
`colitis compared Asacol at 1.6 g'day (comparable with
`4 g of sulfasalazine) with Asacol at 800 mWday (com-
`parable with 2 g of sulfasalazine) vs. placebo.1° Both
`doses of mesalazine were superior to placebo, but the
`study was not 'powered' to assess differences between
`the active dosing. Trials of higher doses of mesalazine
`have not, as yet, been performed. Likewise, trials have
`not been undertaken to examine the dosing required in
`patients who need more than 2.4 g of Asacol or 4 g of
`Pentasa to achieve remission. In contrast with clinical
`trial data, there is extensive experience with the clinical
`utility of mesalazine as maintenance therapy for
`ulcerative colitis. Unlike sulfasalazine, mesalazine can
`be used safely in doses up to 4.8 g daily without dose-
`related toxicity.". 12 Our approach at the University of
`Chicago is to continue for maintenance therapy the
`mesalazine dose that induced remission.
`Topical (rectal) mesalazine can also be used as
`maintenance therapy for patients with distal ulcerative
`colitis." In this setting, there does not appear to be a
`dose-response above doses of 1 g nightly for topical
`therapy; however, the dose frequency is more relevant
`in this setting than daily dosing. Although daily
`(nightly) therapy is more effective than treatment every
`other or every third night, approximately 60% of
`patients can be maintained with the application of
`topical mesalazine every third night." In addition, a
`combination of oral and topical mesalazine has been
`utilized and is more efficacious than oral mesalazine
`alone.14
`Mesalazine maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis
`can therefore be used effectively at doses of up to 4.8 g
`daily without increasing toxicity or adverse events.
`When topical (rectal) mesalazine is employed as main-
`tenance therapy, the dose frequency is more relevant
`than topical dosing, although up to 4 g nightly can be
`utilized without dose-related side-effects. In clinical
`practice for refractory patients, combination therapy
`with 4.8 g of oral mesalazine and 4 g enema therapy
`has been used without identifiable long-term side-effects
`(personal experience).
`A recently identified, additional benefit of aminosali-
`cylate therapy for ulcerative colitis is the expanding
`evidence in favour of chemoprevention against the
`development of dysplasia and colorectal cancer."' 16
`
`© 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aliment Pharmacol Titer 20 (Suppl. 4), 97-101
`
`SALIXN00012374
`
`Dr. Falk Ex. 2010
`GeneriCo v. Dr. Falk IPR2016-00297
`Page 2
`
`

`
`REVIEW: MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS 99
`
`The absolute risk reduction with aminosalicylate ther-
`apy ranges from 1.6% at 10 years after diagnosis to
`14.6% after 30 years. The number needed to treat to
`avoid one case of colorectal cancer after 30 years of
`ulcerative colitis in a Danish cohort17 equals seven.18
`There also appears to be a dose—response above 2 g of
`sulfasalazine or 1.2 g of mesalazine daily.
`Despite the evidence stated above, a number of
`controversies remain regarding the utility of aminosal-
`icylate as maintenance therapy. As previously dis-
`cussed, a dose—response for mesalazine maintenance
`therapy has yet to be established and, in particular, for
`the expanding subgroup of patients who require doses
`greater than 2.4 Wday of mesalazine to achieve remis-
`sion. Similarly, to date, there is no clinical trial evidence
`to support the role of mesalazine after steroid-induced
`remission in ulcerative colitis. A recent trial comparing
`2.4 g mesalazine daily with a probiotic did not identify
`maintenance benefit for mesalazine compared with the
`Nissle strain of Escherichia coli.19 Finally, adherence to
`maintenance therapy is an important consideration for
`long-term benefits, as patients who continue to adhere
`have a far superior prognosis than patients who
`discontinue maintenance therapy.20
`
`IMMUNOMODULATORS
`
`The purine antimetabolites have been evaluated in
`clinical trials and in clinical series as maintenance
`therapies for ulcerative colitis.4' 21 To date, their benefit
`has been primarily explored in patients with steroid-
`dependent ulcerative colitis. A second indication for their
`use is following ciclosporin induction therapy.22. 23
`However, the dose and duration of therapy have yet to
`be investigated and the requisite for concurrent amino-
`salicylate treatment has not been established.
`Controlled clinical trials by the Oxford Group demon-
`strated a numerical, but not statistical, benefit for
`azathioprine (at a dose of 2.5 mg'kg) compared with
`placebo at maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis. 24
`The most compelling data, however, come from a
`double-blind withdrawal trial enrolling patients who
`required azathioprine to achieve remission. In patients
`who continued on azathioprine maintenance therapy
`(together with an aminosalicylate), remissions were
`prolonged when compared with patients who were
`randomized to placebo therapy (64% of patients main-
`tained remission on azathioprine vs. 40% of pati-
`ents randomized to placebo: P < 0.01).25 A similar
`
`proportion of patients (60-70%) have maintained
`remission in uncontrolled series from New York,21
`Italy26 and the UK.27
`Recent studies have also demonstrated the additional
`benefit of azathioprine or mercaptopurine in maintain-
`ing remissions for patients after ciclosporin induction
`therapy.22' 23 Consistent results from both North Amer-
`ica and Europe have demonstrated that over two-thirds
`of patients who achieve remission with ciclosporin are
`able to maintain remission with purine antimetabolite
`therapy.
`
`NICOTINE
`
`Nicotine therapy has had modest benefits for patients
`with ulcerative colitis, but has failed to demonstrate
`significant maintenance effects.28 In contrast, and
`without controlled trial evidence, resumption of cigar-
`ette smoking has been of clinical benefit for patients
`with ulcerative colitis who developed colitis after
`smoking cessation (personal observations). The risk
`and benefit, as well as any dose—response for cigarette
`smoking, need to be established.
`
`MAINTENANCE IN REFRACTORY COLITIS
`
`The assessment of maintenance therapies for ulcerative
`colitis requires adequate therapeutic dosing, duration of
`therapy and delivery system. In addition, as mentioned
`above, the distinction between steroid dependence and
`steroid maintenance therapy needs to be clarified. There
`are also a number of factors that lead to a 'pseudo-
`refractory' state. These include patients with concurrent
`irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, women with
`variations in their bowel symptoms associated with
`the menstrual cycle, poor adherence to medical therapy,
`concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
`and rare individuals with aminosalicylate intoler-
`ance.29' 3° These factors need to be considered prior to
`defining a patient as being 'refractory' to medical
`maintenance therapy.
`The options for maintaining remission in patients with
`refractory colitis are different for patients with distal and
`extensive disease. For patients with distal ulcerative
`colitis, the most effective maintenance therapy is the
`continuation of topical mesalazine treatment.13 In
`addition, a purine antimetabolite may be added, but
`requires 3-6 months for the optimization of benefit.
`Patients who are ex-smokers may also resume low doses
`
`© 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aliment Pharmacol 7'her 20 (Suppl. 4). 97-101
`
`SALIXN00012375
`
`Dr. Falk Ex. 2010
`GeneriCo v. Dr. Falk IPR2016-00297
`Page 3
`
`

`
`100 S. B. HANAUER
`
`of cigarette smoking (between 5 and 10 cigarettes per
`day), which have not been demonstrated to have
`significant health risks. Finally, although many clini-
`cians are reluctant to recommend surgery for patients
`with 'only distal colitis', it should be emphasized that the
`indication for colectomy in ulcerative colitis is not
`dependent only on the extent of disease.
`For patients with extensive colitis who are refractory to
`maintenance therapy, higher doses of aminosalicylate
`(up to 4.8 g) can be administered without dose-related
`toxicity. In addition, the purine antimetabolites have
`been successful at maintaining remission and, as
`described above, ex-smokers can resume smoking
`between 5 and 10 cigarettes per day. For truly
`refractory patients, colectomy is advocated. Before
`deciding whether a patient is refractory to aminosali-
`cylate, consideration should be made for the rare patient
`with aminosalicylate intolerance. Therefore, before
`deliberation of surgery, a trial without aminosalicylate
`treatment may be attempted if a patient has not
`demonstrated the ability to maintain remission with
`aminosalicylate therapy alone. Finally, lack of adher-
`ence (compliance) should be considered for patients
`with unexpected relapse; in particular, males with a
`short duration of remission have been found to be less
`compliant than other groups of patients.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`Corticosteroids are ineffective as maintenance therapy
`for ulcerative colitis, and the distinction between steroid
`dependence and maintenance benefit needs to be
`understood. Aminosalicylates are the foundational
`maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis and, in
`patients requiring 'high-dose' aminosalicylate therapy
`to induce remission, maintenance at the same dose can
`be continued without dose-related toxicity. Patients
`requiring topical mesalazine to achieve remission will
`often require maintenance therapy with topical dosing.
`The benefits of aminosalicylates, although typically used
`in clinical practice, have not been established after
`steroid-induced remission. In the latter group of
`patients, the purine antimetabolites are more likely to
`be effective. Maintenance therapy should be individual-
`ized for patients according to their previous response to
`treatment and history of relapse and adherence, the
`inductive therapy used to achieve remission and the
`mucosal extent of disease. The induction of remission
`should be established before initiating maintenance
`
`treatment. Steroid tapering will need to be tailored
`according to individual responses to treatment and, for
`patients requiring topical mesalazine to achieve remis-
`sion, steroids should be tapered before consideration of
`the tapering of mesalazine treatment.
`Ultimately, a sequential strategy is a useful long-term
`approach in patients with ulcerative colitis. Patients
`requiring oral aminosalicylates to induce remission can
`continue on the same dose to prevent relapse. Patients
`requiring rectal mesalazine to achieve remission will
`typically require topical maintenance therapy, although
`a transition to oral treatment may be attempted. After
`corticosteroid induction therapy, attempts at aminosal-
`icylate maintenance therapy have been the standard
`approach in clinical practice, although many patients
`may require a purine antimetabolite with or without
`aminosalicylate maintenance. Purine antimetabolites
`are also a standard addition to aminosalicylates after
`ciclosporin induction. Finally, as ex-smokers are the
`most refractory group of patients, the consideration of
`resumption of low-dose cigarette smoking may be
`necessary in ex-smokers with refractory disease.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1 Langholz E, Munkholm P, Davidsen M, Binder V. Course of
`ulcerative colitis: analysis of changes in disease activity over
`years. Gastroenterology 1994; 107(1): 3-11.
`2 Fredd S. Standards for Approval of New Drugs for 1BD. In-
`flamm Bowel Dis 1995; 1(4): 284-94.
`3 Riley SA, Mani V, Goodman MJ, Dutt S, Herd ME. Microscopic
`activity in ulcerative colitis: what does it mean? Gut 1991;
`32(2): 174-8.
`4 Kamm MA. Review article: maintenance of remission in
`ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16(Suppl.
`4): 21-4.
`5 Ardizzone S, Petrillo M, Imbesi V, Cerutti R, Bollani 5, Bianchi
`Porro G. Is maintenance therapy always necessary for patients
`with ulcerative colitis in remission? Aliment Pharmacol Ther
`1999; 13(3): 373-9.
`6 Hanauer SB. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 1996;
`334(13): 841-8.
`7 Sutherland L, Roth D, Beck P, May G, Makiyama K. Oral
`5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcer-
`ative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 4:
`CD000544.
`8 Gisbert JP, Gomollon F, Mate J, Pajares JM. Role of 5-amino-
`salicylic acid (5-ASA) in treatment of inflammatory bowel
`disease: a systematic review. Dig Dis Sci 2002; 47(3): 471-88.
`9 Mulder CJ, Tytgat GN, Weterman IT, et al. Double-blind
`comparison of slow-release 5-aminosalicylate and sulfasala-
`zine in remission maintenance in ulcerative colitis. Gastro-
`enterology 1998; 95(6): 1449-53.
`
`CO 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aliment Pharmaco! Ther 20 (Suppl. 4), 97-101
`
`SALIXN00012376
`
`Dr. Falk Ex. 2010
`GeneriCo v. Dr. Falk IPR2016-00297
`Page 4
`
`

`
`REVIEW: MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS
`
`101
`
`10 The Mesalamine Study Group. An oral preparation of mesal-
`amine as long-term maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis.
`A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med
`1996; 124(2): 204-11.
`11 Kornbluth A, Sachar DB. Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines
`in adults. American College of Gastroenterology, Practice
`Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92(2):
`204-11.
`12 Hanauer SB. Aminosalicylate therapy for ulcerative colitis. In:
`Bayless TM, Hanauer SB, eds. Advanced Therapy of Inflam-
`matory Bowel Disease. Hamilton, Ont.: B.C. Decker Inc, 2001:
`123-6.
`13 Cohen RD. Woseth DM, Thisted RA, Hanauer SB. A meta-
`analysis and overview of the literature on treatment options
`for left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis. Am J
`Gastroenterol 2000: 95(5): 1263-76.
`14 d'Albasio G, Pacini F, Camarri E, et al. Combined therapy with
`5-aminosalicylic acid tablets and enemas for maintaining
`remission in ulcerative colitis: a randomized, double-blind
`study. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92(7): 1143-7.
`15 Eaden J. Review article: the data supporting a role for ami-
`nosalicylates in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in
`patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol
`Ther 2003; 18(Suppl. 2): 15-21.
`16 Allgayer H. Review article: mechanisms of action of mesala-
`zine in preventing colorectal carcinoma in inflammatory
`bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18(Suppl. 2):
`10-4.
`17 Langholz E, Munkhom P, Davidsen M, et al. Colorectal cancer
`risk and mortality in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastro-
`enterology 1992; 103: 1444-51.
`18 Munkhohn P. Review article: the incidence and prevalence of
`colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment
`Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18(Suppl. 2): 1-5.
`19 Rembacken BJ, Snelling AM, Hawkey PM, Chalmers DM,
`Axon AT. Non-pathogenic Escherichia coli versus mesalazine
`for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial.
`Lancet 1999; 354(9179): 635-9.
`
`20 Kane S, Huo D, Aikens J, Hanauer S. Medication nonadher-
`ence and the outcomes of patients with quiescent ulcerative
`colitis. Am J Med 2003; 114(1): 39-43.
`21 George J, Present DH, Pou R, Bodian C. Rubin PH. The long-
`term outcome of ulcerative colitis treated with 6-mercaptop-
`urine. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91(9): 1711-4.
`22 Actis GC, Bresso F, Astegiano M, et al. Safety and efficacy of
`azathioprine in the maintenance of ciclosporin-induced
`remission of ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;
`15(9): 1307-11.
`23 Cohen RD, Stein R, Hanauer SB. Intravenous cyclosporin in
`ulcerative colitis: a five-year experience. Am J Gastroenterol
`1999; 94(6): 1587-92.
`24 Jewell DP, Truelove SC. Azathioprine in ulcerative colitis: final
`report on controlled therapeutic trial. Br Med J 1974;
`4(5945): 627-30.
`25 Hawthorne AB, Logan RF, Hawkey CJ, et al. Randomised
`controlled trial of azathioprine withdrawal in ulcerative coli-
`tis. Br Med J 1992; 305(6844): 20-2.
`26 Ardizzone S, Molteni P, Imbesi V, Bollani S, Bianchi Porro G,
`Molteni F. Azathioprine in steroid-resistant and steroid-
`dependent ulcerative colitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997: 25(1):
`330-3.
`27 Fraser AG, Orchard TR, Jewell DP. The efficacy of azathioprine
`for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a 30 year
`review. Gut 2002; 50(4): 485-9.
`28 Thomas GAL Rhodes J, Mani V, et al. Transdermal nicotine as
`maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med
`1995; 332(15): 988-92.
`29 Miner PB Jr. Factors influencing the relapse of patients with
`inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92(12
`Suppl.): 1S-4S.
`30 Gelbmann CM. Prediction of treatment refractoriness in
`ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease — do we have reliable
`markers? Inflamm Bowel Dis 2000; 6(2): 123-31.
`
`© 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Aliment Pharmacol 7'her 20 (Suppl. 4). 97-101
`
`SALIXN00012377
`
`Dr. Falk Ex. 2010
`GeneriCo v. Dr. Falk IPR2016-00297
`Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket