throbber
United States Patent [19]
`Cashier
`
`lllllllllllllllllll-lllll-lllllllllllm 111111111� 11111111111
`
`
`
`
`
`US005732375A
`[11] Patent Number: 5,732,375
`Mar. 24, 1998
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`OR ALLOWING
`[54] METHOD OF INHIBITING
`AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT
`
`[75] Inventor:
`Robert John Cashier, Kokomo, Ind.
`
`[73] Assignee:
`
`
`Delco Electronics Corp., Kokomo, Ind.
`
`12/1995 Schousek ................................ 180/268
`5,474,327
`2/1996 Blackburn et al . ..................... 280/735
`5,494,311
`10/1996 Barms ..................................... 364/559
`5,570,301
`1111996 Meister et al . .......................... 280/735
`5,570,903
`
`2/1997 Blackburn et al. . .................... 280/735
`5,605,348
`
`3/1997 Zeidler et al. . .................. 364/424.055
`5,612,876
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 566,029
`
`Nguyen
`
`Research Disclosure-Jan. 1994 #357-"Method for Sens­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ing Occupant Mass and Position." Disclosed Anonymously.
`[22] Filed: Dec. 1, 1995
`Primary Examiner-Tan Q.
`[51] Int CL 6 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• B60R 21132; G06F 17/40
`Auomey, Agent, or Finn-Mark A. Navarre
`180/273; [52] U.S. Cl • .............................. 701/45; 701/46;
`
`
`280/735
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`[58] Field of Search .....................
`
`364/424.055, 424.056,
`An array of pressure sensors on a vehicle passenger seat
`
`
`
`
`
`364/424.057, 567, 568; 180/271, 282,268,
`
`
`
`senses the presence of an occupant including an infant seat
`
`
`273; 307/15.1; 340/436, 438; 280/735,
`
`and determines whether the infant seat faces forward or
`
`730.ol, 730.02
`
`
`rearward. A microprocessor coupled to the sensors deter­
`
`
`based on the mines whether to allow or inhibit deployment
`
`sensor load forces and the pattern of loading. The pattern can
`
`identify an infant seat and pattern and loading determine its
`Local areas are checked to detect child occu­
`orientation.
`5,010,774
`4/1991 Kiko et al . ......................... 73/862.042
`pants. Fuzzy logic is used to determine loading and to
`5,161,820
`11/1992 Vollmer ................................ 280/730.1
`
`recognize patterns.
`5,232,243
`8/1993 Blackburn et al ...................... 280/732
`5,384,716
`1/1995 Araki et al. ............................. 364/557
`10/1995 Mazur et al . ........................... 280/735
`5,454,591
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENf DOCUMENI'S
`
`19 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`IPR2016-00291 - Ex. 1001
`Toyota Motor Corp., Petitioner
`
`1
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent Mar. 24, 1998
`Sheet 1 of 4
`FIG - 1
`
`5,732,375
`
`FIG - 2
`
`5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
`
`[§]
`
`[1]
`
`5
`
`10·
`
`15 IT]
`
`20
`
`�
`
`[[] []]
`25
`30 [I] 0 � 0]
`[I]
`[ill
`35
`
`40
`
`2
`
`

`
`FIG· 3 hNPUT 12\ _F36
`
`FIG- 4
`
`ADJUST DATA WITH BIAS I 38
`
`AND LOWPASS FILTER
`THE DATA
`
`FROM FILTERED DATA
`
`COMPUTE ALL DECISION
`MEASURES
`
`40
`
`42
`
`INHIBIT � �
`
`ALLOW
`
`46----. I
`
`�
`
`I ....--48
`
`TURN ON I
`
`INHIBIT LIGHT
`
`I TURN ON I
`
`ALLOW LIGHT
`
`COMPUTE DECISON MEASURES
`
`TOTAL FORCE = SUM
`OF SENSOR VALUES
`• COMPUTE FUZZY CONTR.
`
`DETERMINE EACH LOAD RATING
`
`COMPUTE
`• TOTAL LOAD R ATING
`• FUZZY CONTR.
`
`CHECK FOR LOCALIZED A REA
`I
`SET FLAG FOR
`• ALL F RONT
`• ALL LEFT
`• ALL RIGHT
`• ALL REAR
`
`�4o
`
`50
`
`r 52
`
`54
`
`56
`
`I
`
`COMPUTE FORCEAND
`FUZZY CONTR. FOR
`• FRONT PAIR
`• REAR PAIR
`I • RIGHT PAIR
`• LEFT PAIR
`• CENTER FOUR
`
`r-58
`
`I
`
`TO DECISION ALGORITHM }
`
`d
`•
`00
`•
`1-d =
`� � a
`
`�
`�
`:;
`N
`��
`
`1-" \Cl \Cl 00
`
`r.t:J ;
`(!) ......
`N
`0 �
`�
`
`Ol � "'
`w
`N � w
`"' Ol
`
`3
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent Mar. 24, 1998
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`5,732,375
`
`FORCE OR LOAD
`FUZZY
`CONTRIBUTION
`FIG- 5
`
`b
`
`c
`
`FORCE
`OR LOAD
`
`4 --------,-------- -·---------
`1
`I
`
`LOAD RATING
`
`FIG- 6
`
`o�------�----------------�
`d
`
`LOAD
`
`5 1 0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`FIG -7 20
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`FIG- 9
`
`·'-·FRONT
`
`LEFT
`
`•• [ill :J
`• ..A
`( [[]
`[]]
`,--RIGHT
`\ ...
`' I
`---·REAR
`I I
`I
`I i[g] '
`.m
`[ITJ (":
`rn
`I '
`! \ [I}\
`[Q] j ,'
`' I
`.. -.. -----....----
`./ ,' ,
`
`\
`
`'
`..
`
`______
`
`YES
`
`FRONT PAIR LOADED
`AND TOTAL FORCE > Y
`
`4
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent Mar. 24, 1998
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`5,732,375
`
`60
`
`68
`
`Hl
`
`INHIBIT
`
`INFANT SEAT TYPE
`
`62
`
`ALLOW
`
`LOCALIZED FORCE
`AND FLAG
`
`HI
`
`TOTAL LOAD RATING
`
`FRONT FORCE & ALL FRONT FLAG
`
`LEFT FORCE & ALL LEFT FLAG
`
`74
`
`76
`
`RIGHT FORCE & ALL RIGHT FLAG
`
`78
`
`REAR FORCE & ALL REAR FLAG
`
`80
`
`HI
`
`CENTER GROUP FORCE
`
`HI
`TOTAL FUZZY VALUE
`
`84
`
`FIG- 8
`
`5
`
`

`
`1
`METHOD OF INHffiiTING OR ALLOWING
`AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT
`
`5,732,375
`
`2
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`sample each sensor, determine a total weight parameter by
`
`
`summing the pressures, and determine the pattern of pres­
`
`sure distribution by evaluating local groups of sensors.
`Total force is sufficient for proper detection of adults in
`5 the seat, but the pattern recognition provides improved
`
`
`detection of small children and infant seats. To detect infant
`This invention relates to occupant restraints for vehicles
`
`seats, all patterns of sensor loading which correspond to the
`and particularly to a method using seat sensors to determine
`imprints of various seats are stored in a table and the
`seat occupancy for control of airbag deployment.
`detected sensor pattern is compared to the table entries.
`10 Front and rear facing seats are discriminated on the basis of
`
`total force and the loading of sensors in the front of the seat.
`The expanding use of supplemental inflatable restraints
`
`
`
`The pattern recognition for detecting children is made
`
`(SIRs) or airbags for occupant protection in vehicles increas­
`possible by applying fuzzy logic concepts to the pressure
`ingly involves equipment for the front outboard passenger
`
`readings for each sensor in the array and assigning a load
`seat. The driver side airbag has been deployed whenever an 15
`rating to each sensor. Pattern recognition is also enhanced by
`imm inent crash is sensed. The position and size of the driver
`
`
`sampling several pairs of sensors, applying leveling tech­
`is fairly predictable so that such deployment can advanta­
`nique to them, and computing a measure for the area of the
`geously interact with the driver upon a crash. The passenger
`
`
`seat covered by each pair. For all measures calculated within
`seat, however, may be occupied by a large or a small
`
`the algorithm, a contribution is made to an overall fuzzy
`occupant including a baby in an infant seat. It can not be 20
`rating which is used to handle marginal cases.
`assumed that a passenger of any size is at an optimum
`position (leaning against or near the seat back). An infant
`seat is normally used in a rear facing position for small
`The above and other advantages of the invention will
`
`babies and in a forward facing position for larger babies and
`
`
`become more apparent from the following description taken
`small children. While the forward facing position approxi-25
`
`in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein
`
`mates the preferred position for airbag interaction, the rear
`like references refer to like parts and wherein:
`
`facing position places the top portion of the infant seat close
`FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an SIR system incor­
`to the vehicle dash which houses the airbag. In the latter
`porating a seat occupant detector;
`
`event, it is desirable to prevent deployment of the airbag.
`It has been proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,327
`which 30
`FIG. 2 is a position diagram of seat sensors for the system
`of FIG. 1, according
`to the invention;
`will issue Dec. 12, 1995, entitled VEHICLE OCCUPANT
`RESTRAINT WITH
`SEJIT PRESSURE SENSOR and
`
`FIG. 3 is a flow chart representing an overview of an
`assigned to the assignee of this invention, to incorporate
`
`
`algorithm for determining deployment permission according
`
`pressure sensors in the passenger seat and monitor the
`to the invention;
`35
`
`
`
`response of the sensors by a microprocessor to evaluate the
`FIG. 4 is a flow chart representing
`a method of computing
`
`weight distribution and determine the type of occupant and
`decision measures used in the algorithm of FIG. 3;
`
`the facing direction of an infant seat. The sensor arrange­
`FIG. 5 is a graphical representation
`of a function used in
`
`
`ment and the algorithm successfully cover most cases of seat
`fuzzy logic for total force and load ratings;
`occupancy. It is desirable, however,
`to encompass every case
`40
`of a function used in
`FIG. 6 is a graphical representation
`of seat occupancy.
`
`fuzzy logic for determining load rating;
`SUMM ARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`FIG. 7 is a position diagram of seat sensors illustrating
`sensor grouping;
`It is therefore an object of the invention to detect a
`FIG. 8 is a flow chart for deployment decision, according
`
`comprehensive range of vehicle seat occupants including
`45 to the invention; and
`
`infant seats for a determination of whether an airbag deploy­
`FIG. 9 is a flow chart representing the logic for deter­
`
`ment should be permitted. Another object in such a system
`
`mining the facing direction of an infant seat as required by
`
`is to determine whether an infant seat is facing the front or
`the algorithm of FIG. 8.
`
`the rear. Another object is to include sensitivity to the
`possible seating positions of small children.
`50
`DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`A SIR system, as is well known, has an acceleration
`Referring to FIG. 1, a SIR system includes
`a SIR module
`
`sensor to detect an impending crash, a microprocessor to
`13 coupled to a seat occupant sensing system 14. The SIR
`
`process the sensor signal and to decide whether to deploy an
`15 mounted on the
`
`airbag, and a deployment unit fired by the microprocessor.
`module 13 includes an accelerometer
`if an occupant 55
`An occupant detection system can determine
`vehicle body for sensing an impending crash, a micropro­
`
`cessor 16 for receiving a signal from the accelerometer and
`or infant seat is positioned in a way to not benefit from
`
`deployment, and then signaling the microprocessor whether
`
`
`for deciding whether to deploy an airbag. An airbag deploy­
`
`ment unit 18 is controlled by the microprocessor 16 and fires
`to allow or inhibit deploying the airbag.
`
`
`a pyrotechnic or compressed gas device to inflate an airbag
`
`located in the seat, can garner A dozen sensors, judicially
`
`20,
`60 when a deploy co mma
`
`nd is received. A fault indicator
`sufficient pressure and distribution information to allow
`
`
`also controlled by the microprocessor 16 will show a failure
`
`
`determination of the occupant type and infant seat position.
`of the seat occupant sensing system 14.
`This information, in turn, can be used as desired to inhibit
`14 comprises a micro­
`
`SIR deployment. The sensors are arranged symmetrically
`The seat occupant sensing system
`processor 22 having a 5 volt supply and an enabling line 24
`
`about the seat centerline and includes a front pair, a right
`provided with a 5 volt enabling pulse, and a
`pair, a rear pair, a left pair and four in the center. Each sensor
`65 periodically
`is a very thin resistive device, having lower resistance as
`
`series of voltage dividers coupled between the enabling ·line
`24 and ground. Each voltage divider has a fixed resistor
`
`pressure increases. A microprocessor is programm ed to
`26
`
`
`6
`
`

`
`3
`
`5,732,375
`
`4
`
`The next step in F1G. 4 is to determine the load rating of
`in series with a pressure sensor or variable resistor 28, and
`
`
`
`
`
`the junction point of each resistor 26 and variable resistor 28
`
`each sensor <52>. The load rating is a measure of whether
`to an ND port 30 of the microprocessor
`the. sensor is detecting some load and is used for pattern
`is connected
`22. The
`line 24 and
`
`
`recognition pwposes. Low loads present a borderline case
`
`microprocessor 22 controls the pulse on enabling
`reads each sensor 28 voltage during the pulse period. The
`5 which is rated by fuzzy logic according
`
`to a function similar
`to that of F1G. 5. As shown in F1G. 6, if a load is below a
`
`microprocessor 22 analyzes the sensor inputs and issues a
`base value d, which may be four, the rating is zero and if it
`decision whether to inhibit airbag deployment and the
`
`
`decision is coupled to the microprocessor 16 by a line 32.
`is above the base value it is the difference between the base
`
`
`
`The microprocessor 22 also monitors its decisions for con­
`and the measured load up to a limit value of, say, four. The
`and issues a fault signal on line 34 to the micro­
`sistency
`10 total load rating is calculated <54> by summing the indi­
`
`processor 16 if faults continue
`to occur over a long period.
`
`
`vidual sensor ratings and the fuzzy contribution of the total
`26 is. for example. 10 kohrns and the
`Each fixed resistor
`load rating is again determined as in HG. 5 where a total
`vary between 10 kohms at high pressure
`variable resistors
`and 100 kohrns at low pressure.
`
`load below a minimum threshold b is zero, a total load above
`Then the voltage applied to
`the minimum is the total load minus the minimum threshold
`the ports 30 will vary
`with pressure. Each sensor comprises
`15 up to a limit at maximum threshold c. The minimum
`two polyester sheets each having a film of resistive ink
`
`threshold may be four, for example, and the maximum
`may be 24.
`
`
`
`connected to a conductive electrode, the two resistive films
`threshold
`
`
`contacting one another such that the resistance between
`Next a check is made for force concentration in a local­
`
`
`
`
`electrodes decreases as pressure increases. Such pressure
`
`ized area <56>. Four overlapping localized areas are defined
`
`sensors are available as ALPS pressure sensors from Alps
`20 as shown in F1G. 7. The front four sensors 1, 6, 7 and 12 are
`Electric Co. Ltd, Tokyo. Japan.
`in the front group, the rear eight sensors 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10
`The mounting arrangement of sensors 28 on a bottom
`and 11 are in the rear group, the left eight sensors 1, 2, 3. 4,
`bucket seat cushion is shown in F1G. 2. The sensors are
`5. 6, 8, and 9 are in the left group, and the eight sensors 4,
`numbered 1-12 according to seat location. A left pair of
`5, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, and 12 are in the right group. The algorithm
`sensors 1 and 2 are on the left side of the seat with sensor
`25 determines if the pressure
`
`is all concentrated in one group by
`
`2 to the rear and slightly inboard of sensor 1. Sensors 11 and
`
`summing the load ratings of the sensors in each group and
`
`
`12 are the corresponding right pair of sensors. A front pair
`lf the rating sum of any
`comparing to the total load rating.
`of sensors 6 and 7 are at the front of the seat and a rear pair
`group is equal to the total rating, a flag is set for that group
`of sensors 3 and 10 are at the rear. The four remaining
`(all right, all front etc.).
`sensors 4, 5, 8 and 9 are the center group of sensors. Sensors
`and are just in front of 30
`Finally the force and fuzzy contribution is computed for
`
`5 and 8 are astride the seat centerline
`each pair of sensors and for the center group <58>. The force
`
`sensors 4 and 9. The center group is positioned just to the
`rear of the seat middle.
`
`on each pair is used to detect occupants such as small
`children which can easily sit in one small area of the seat.
`The method of operation is illustrated by a series of
`
`
`These measures are looking for the pressure to be evenly
`
`flowcharts wherein the functional description of each block
`35 distributed
`over the two sensors of the pair. To accomplish
`in the chart is accompanied by a number in angle brackets
`
`
`this the algorithm looks at each pair, determines the mini­
`
`
`<nn> which corresponds to the reference number of the
`
`mum value of the two sensors, and clip the higher one to a
`shown in F1G. 3 wherein the
`
`block. The overall operation is
`calibrated "delta" from the lower. lf the force is evenly
`22 <36> and
`
`sensor values are read by the microprocessor
`distributed over the two sensors the values will be about
`
`
`the data is adjusted by bias correction and low pass filtering
`
`40 equal and the sum will be unaffected by clipping. The sum
`<38>. One sensor at a time is turned on, sampled four times
`
`of the two sensor forces, as adjusted, comprise the force
`
`
`and averaged. Then a bias calibrated for each sensor is
`
`measure of the pair. The fuzzy contribution of each pair is
`
`
`subtracted from each sensor reading, and the data is filtered
`equal to the force measure of the pair but limited to a
`on the order of 1 second. Then all
`maximum value such as 20 which is calibrated separately
`with a time constant
`for
`
`decision measures are computed <40> and decision algo­
`45 each pair. The center group measure
`is the sum of the sensor
`
`
`rithms are run <42>. illtimately a decision is made to allow
`
`forces and the fuzzy contribution is equal to the sum of the
`
`or inhibit airbag deployment <44>. Then either an inhibit
`maximum
`four sensors but limited to a calibrated
`value.
`light is turned on <46> or an allow light is turned on <48>.
`F1G. 4 shows the algorithm for computing decision
`mea­
`sures 40. Total force
`
`is calculated by summing the sensor
`SENSOR
`for the total 50
`values and a fuzzy contribution is calculated
`Pattern 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
`force <50>. Each sensor produces a voltage which is
`as a digital value in the range of 0-255. The
`expressed
`on the order of 0-50. however. An empty
`1
`u L L
`L L u
`u L L u
`typical range is
`0 after the bias adjustments.
`u u
`2 L
`u
`u
`L
`3 L
`u u u L u u
`seat will have a total force near
`A fully loaded seat could go up to about 3000 but 2000 is 55
`4
`L
`L L u L
`L
`L
`5
`L u u
`u u
`L
`more likely. For discrimination pwposes, the inhibit/allow
`is less then 255 and for reporting to the display
`6 u L u u L u u
`software, the value is clipped to 255. The total fuzzy
`u L u
`u u
`L u
`7
`u u L L u u
`8 L
`LX L
`9 LX L
`u
`u
`
`
`contribution is determined according to the function shown
`LX L
`u u
`10
`in F1G. 5. lf the total force is below a minimum or inhibit 60
`11 L
`L
`L
`threshold b. the fuzzy value is zero; if it is above a maximum
`12 L
`u
`u
`or allow threshold, the fuzzy value is the difference between
`and if it is between the
`
`the inhibit and allow thresholds;
`
`thresholds the fuzzy value is equal to the force value minus
`The measured values, ratings, patterns and flags are used
`for each 65
`
`
`
`the inhibit threshold. The thresholds are calibrated
`in deciding whether to allow or inhibit deployment. As
`shown in HG. 8, the decision algorithm 42 first decides if
`
`
`
`application; they may be for example, an inhibit threshold of
`<60> and if so whether the
`
`32 and an allow threshold of 128.
`rails of an infant seat are detected
`
`
`threshold
`
`L
`LX L
`L
`L
`
`7
`
`

`
`5,732,375
`
`6
`5
`
`allowing deployment for a forward facing seat; and
`seat is facing forwardly or rearwardly <62>. Deployment is
`
`allowed for a forward facing seat and inhibited for a rear
`
`inhibiting deployment for a rearward facing seat.
`facing seat. This is determined as shown in FIG. 9 wherein
`
`3. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 2
`if the total force
`
`is greater than a certain value <64> the seat
`wherein the step of determining a pattern of sensor loading
`is allowed. If not, and the
`5 comprises detecting which sensors are below a first load
`
`is forward facing and deployment
`front pair of sensors is loaded and the total force is greater
`
`threshold and which sensors are above a second load thresh­
`
`
`than another set value <66>, the seat is forward facing and
`old.
`
`deployment is allowed. Otherwise the seat is rear facing and
`4. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 2
`
`It should be noted that whenever an
`
`deployment is inhibited.
`
`wherein the step of determining from the pattern of loaded
`is controlling 10
`
`
`inhibit or allow decision is made, that decision
`sensors whether an infant seat is present comprises:
`and all other conditions
`lower on the chart are bypassed.
`
`establishing a table of loaded and unloaded sensor pat­
`If rails are not detected <60>, the total force is compared
`
`terns which result from the configuration of the bottom
`to high and low thresholds <68>. If it is above the high
`of an infant seat; and
`threshold deployment is allowed and if below the low
`deciding that an infant seat is present when the pattern of
`Otherwise, if the 15
`threshold the deployment is inhibited.
`sensor loading matches one of the table patterns.
`
`localized force for a sensor group is above a threshold and
`
`5. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 2
`the flag corresponding to that group is set <70>, deployment
`wherein the step of determining whether tlle infant seat is
`is allowed. If not, the next step is to compare the total load
`facing forward or rearward comprises:
`rating to high and low thresholds <72>. Deployment is
`and inhib-20
`allowed if the rating is above the high threshold
`deciding that the seat is facing forward when
`ited if below the low threshold.
`1) the total force is greater than a first value, or
`Each of the sensor pairs for
`2) sensors in the front of tlle seat are loaded and the
`front, left, right, and rear are compared to threshold values
`<74-80>. If any of them are above its allowed. If not, the
`total force is greater than a second value; and
`is compared to a threshold <82> to decide
`center group force
`deciding that the seat is facing rearward when both the
`conditions 1) and 2) are not true.
`to 25
`
`
`upon allowance. Finally, the total fuzzy value is compared
`a threshold <84> to allow deployment if it is sufficiently
`6. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 1
`high, and if not the deployment
`
`is inhibited. The fuzzy value
`including:
`decision manages a marginal case where several of the
`determining a pattern of sensor loading;
`previous measures came close to exceeding their thresholds
`prior to tlle step of allowing deployment if the total force
`but didn't, the fuzzy measure can still allow deployment. 30
`
`is above a total threshold force, determining from the
`It will thus be seen that airbag deployment
`can be allowed
`pattern of sensor loading whether an infant seat is on
`
`or inhibited by a pattern of resistive sensors embedded in a
`the seat;
`seat cushion and coupled to a microprocessor to detect the
`then determining from the total force and force distribu­
`force on each sensor to determine the loading pattern as well
`tion whether the infant seat is facing forward or rear­
`from which infant seat presence and 35
`as the force values
`ward;
`
`orientation are determined as well as the presence of other
`allowing deployment for a forward facing seat; and
`
`occupants.
`The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
`
`inhibiting deployment for a rearward facing seat.
`7. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 1
`
`property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
`
`1. A method of airbag control in a vehicle having an array 40
`wherein the defined seat areas overlap so that some sensors
`are included in more tllan one seat area, the seat areas
`
`of force sensors on the passenger seat coupled to a controller
`
`including a front area, a rear area, a right area and a left area
`
`for determining whether to allow airbag deployment based
`
`on sensed force and force distribution comprising the steps
`8. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 1
`wherein each of said seat areas includes a secondary group
`of:
`45 of sensors peculiar
`to that seat area and the method includes:
`measuring the force detected by each sensor;
`
`calculating the total force of the sensor array;
`
`calculating a modified local force for each secondary
`allowing deployment if the total force is above a total
`group located in a seat area in which the total force is
`
`concentrated; and
`threshold force;
`allowing deployment if tlle modified local force for
`defining a plurality of seat areas, at least one sensor
`50
`located in each seat area;
`exceeds a threshold for that secondary group.
`9. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 8
`
`determining the existence of a local pressure area when
`wherein each secondary group of sensors comprises a pair
`
`
`the calculated total force is concentrated in one of said
`
`and the step of calculating a modified local force comprises
`seat areas;
`limiting the higher sensor force to a maximum delta above
`calculating a local force as tlle sum of forces sensed by
`55 tlle lower sensor force and adding the higher sensor force, as
`each sensor located in the seat area in which the total
`
`limited, to the lower sensor force.
`
`force is concentrated; and
`10. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 1
`allowing deployment if the local force is greater than a
`including the steps of:
`
`predefined seat area threshold force.
`2. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 1 60
`defining a center seat area including a group of sensors
`
`located in the center of the passenger seat,
`including:
`determining a pattern of sensor loading;
`
`calculating a local force for the center seat area as the sum
`of the forces sensed by the sensors in the center seat
`determining from tlle pattern of sensor loading whether an
`area; and
`infant seat is on the passenger seat;
`then determining from the total force and force distribu-65
`allowing deployment if the local force for the center seat
`
`tion whether the infant seat is facing forward or rear­
`area is greater than a predefined center seat area thresh­
`ward;
`old force.
`
`8
`
`

`
`7
`
`5,732,375
`
`8
`
`11. A method of airbag control in a vehicle having
`an array
`
`setting minimum and maximum thresholds for the total
`
`of force sensors on the passenger seat coupled to a controller
`force and total load rating; and
`
`for detennining whether to allow airbag deployment based
`
`subtracting the minimum thresholds from the respective
`
`
`on sensed force and force distribution comprising the steps
`
`total force and total load rating, and limiting each
`of:
`5
`
`difference to the respective maximum threshold; and
`measuring the force sensed by each sensor;
`
`
`determining the fuzzy total and total loading contribution
`calculating the total force of the sensor array;
`values based on the respective limited differences.
`allowing deployment if the total force is above a total
`17. A method of airbag control in a vehicle having an
`array of force sensors on the passenger seat coupled to a
`
`threshold force;
`10
`controller for determining whether to allow airbag deploy­
`assigning a load rating to each sensor based on its
`
`ment based on sensed force and force distribution compris­
`measured force, said load ratings being limited to
`ing the steps of:
`maximum value;
`measuring the force sensed by each sensor;
`summing the assigned load ratings for all the sensors to
`15 calculating
`the total force of the sensor array;
`
`derive a total load rating; and
`allowing deployment if the total force is above a total
`allowing deployment if the total load rating is above a
`
`threshold force; and
`
`predefined total load threshold, whereby deployment is
`allowed if the sensed forces are distributed over the
`if the total force
`is not above the total threshold force,
`
`passenger seat. even if the total force is less than the
`
`
`detennining a fuzzy total force contribution value
`20
`
`total threshold force.
`
`based on the calculated total force;
`12. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 11
`
`defining a plurality of seat areas, at least one sensor
`
`wherein the step of assigning a load rating to each sensor
`
`located in each seat area, calculating a local force for
`comprises:
`each seat area as the sum of forces sensed by each
`
`establishing a base force; and
`
`sensor located in that seat area, and detennining a fuzzy
`25
`local force contribution value based on each of the
`
`assigning a load rating according to the measured force
`
`calculated local forces; and
`minus the base force.
`summing the fuzzy total force and fuzzy local force
`13. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 11
`contribution values, and allowing deployment if the
`
`further including the steps of:
`
`summed contribution values exceed a predefined fuzzy
`
`defining a plurality of seat areas, at least one sensor 30
`threshold.
`located in each seat area;
`18. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 17
`
`determining the existence of a local pressure area when
`wherein the steps of detennining the fuzzy total and local
`
`
`the calculated total force is concentrated in one of said
`
`force contribution values comprises:
`seat areas;
`
`calculating a local force as the sum of forces sensed by 35
`total and local force; and
`
`each sensor located in the seat area in which the total
`subtracting the minimum force thresholds from the
`
`force is concentrated; and
`respective total and local forces and limiting each
`allowing deployment if the local force is greater than a
`difference to the respective maximum
`force threshold;
`
`predefined seat area threshold force.
`and
`14. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 13 40
`determining the fuzzy total and local force contribution
`
`
`further including the steps of:
`values based on the respective limited differences.
`
`determining individual fuzzy values based on the total
`19. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 17
`
`force, the local forces for each seat area, and total load
`wherein
`rating;
`45
`a pair of sensors are located
`summing said fuzzy values; and
`in each seat area, and wherein:
`allowing deployment if the summ ed fuzzy values exceed
`
`the step of calculating the local force for each seat area
`a threshold.
`comprises the steps of:
`15. A method of airbag control as set forth in claim 11,
`limiting the higher force of the respective pair of
`50
`
`including the steps of:
`sensors to a set amount greater than the lower force
`determining a fuzzy total force contribution value based
`
`of the respective pair of sensors, and
`
`on the calculated total force;
`summing the lower force and the higher force, as
`determining a fuzzy total loading contribution value based
`
`
`limited, to derive the local force;
`
`on the total load rating; and
`
`and the step of detennining a fuzzy local force contribu­
`55
`summing the fuzzy total force and fuzzy total loading
`tion amount comprises the steps of:
`contribution values, and allowing deployment if the
`setting a maximum pair force threshold, and
`
`
`summed contribution values exceed a predefined fuzzy
`
`setting the fuzzy local force contribution amount equal
`threshold.
`to the local force limited to the maximum pair force
`16. The method of airbag control as defined in claim 15 60
`threshold.
`wherein the steps of determining the fuzzy total force and
`total loading contribution values comprises:
`
`setting a minimum and maximum force threshold for each
`
`* * * * *
`
`9

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket