`Docket No.: 0107131-00351 US2
`
`Filed on behalf of Intel Corporation
`By: Grant K. Rowan, Reg. No. 41,278
`Yung-Hoon Ha, Reg. No. 56,368
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel: (202) 663-6000
`Email: Grant.Rowan@wilmerhale.com
`Yung-Hoon.Ha@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTEL CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`IPR Trial No. IPR2016-00290
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF
`COSMIN MAIER
`
`ActiveUS 156714531v.1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00290; Docket No.: 0107131-00351 US2
`Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cosmin Maier
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Precise Relief Requested
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and Paper No. 4 authorizing the parties to file motions
`
`for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Petitioner Intel Corporation requests that
`
`the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) admit Cosmin Maier pro hac vice in this
`
`proceeding, IPR2016-00290. Patent Owner DSS Technology Management, Inc. does not
`
`oppose.
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts Showing Good Cause for the Board to Recognize Counsel Pro
`Hac Vice During the Proceeding
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice
`
`during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be
`
`a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may impose. Section 42.10(c)
`
`indicates that “where lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by
`
`counsel who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon a showing that counsel is an
`
`experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue
`
`in the proceeding.” The facts here establish good cause for the Board to recognize Cosmin
`
`Maier pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`1.
`
`Lead counsel, Grant Rowan, is a registered practitioner. Backup counsel, Yung-
`
`Hoon Ha, is also a registered practitioner.
`
`2.
`
`Counsel, Cosmin Maier, is an experienced litigator and has an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding. Accompanying this motion as
`
`Exhibit 1121 is the July 19, 2016 Declaration of Cosmin Maier in Support of this Motion for
`
`Admission Pro Hac Vice (“Maier Decl.”). In his declaration, Mr. Maier states:
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York, and am
`
`admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
`
`ActiveUS 156714531v.1
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00290; Docket No.: 0107131-00351 US2
`Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cosmin Maier
`
`Circuit, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
`
`and the Eastern District of New York, and all New York State courts. I have been
`
`admitted pro hac vice in many district courts including the Eastern District of
`
`Texas, the Northern and Central Districts of California, and the Western District
`
`of Washington.
`
`Maier Decl. ¶ 2 (Ex. 1121). Mr. Maier also states:
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I am counsel in
`
`DSS Tech. Mgm’t, Inc. v. Intel Corp. et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-00130 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`(filed Feb. 16, 2015), which is related to and involves the same patent at issue in
`
`this proceeding. ... I received B.S.E. and M.S.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering
`
`from the University of Michigan in 2003 and 2004, respectively.
`
`Maier Decl. ¶¶ 10-11 (Ex. 1121).
`
`3.
`
`The Board has recognized “that there is a need for [a party] to have its related
`
`litigation counsel involved” in the inter partes review process. LKQ Corp. v. ClearLamp, LLC,
`
`Case IPR2013-00020 (Dec. 5, 2012), Paper 13.
`
`4.
`
`In his declaration, Mr. Maier also attests to each of the listed items required by the
`
`“Order—Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013--00639, Paper 7
`
`and agrees to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. See Maier Decl. ¶¶ 1-12 (Ex.
`
`1121).
`
`5.
`
`Finally, this proceeding is just one of four parallel proceedings before this Board
`
`that involve the same Petitioners and Patent Owner, as well as the same lead and backup counsel.
`
`See Case Nos. IPR2016-00287, IPR2016-00288, IPR2016-00289, and IPR2016-00290. Mr.
`
`ActiveUS 156714531v.1
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00290; Docket No.: 0107131-00351 US2
`Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cosmin Maier
`
`Maier’s admission is necessary to enable him to assist lead and backup counsel with litigation-
`
`related tasks—e.g., taking depositions of Patent Owner’s experts—in these concurrent
`
`proceedings.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board admit Cosmin
`
`Maier pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Grant K. Rowan/
`
`Grant K. Rowan
`Registration No. 41,278
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Grant.Rowan@wilmerhale.com
`Tel.: 202-663-6000
`
`Dated: July 19, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 156714531v.1
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00290; Docket No.: 0107131-00351 US2
`Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cosmin Maier
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on July 19, 2016, I caused a true and correct copy of the following
`
`materials:
`
` Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cosmin Maier
`
` Exhibit 1121
`
` Petitioner’s List of Exhibits
`
`to be served via electronic mail on the following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Andriy Lytvyn, Lead Counsel
`USPTO Reg. No. 65,166
`SMITH & HOPEN, P.A.
`180 Pine Avenue North
`Oldsmar, FL 34677
`andriy.lytvyn@smithhopen.com
`Tel.: 813-925-8505
`
`Anton J. Hopen, Backup Counsel
`USPTO Reg. No. 41,849
`SMITH & HOPEN, P.A.
`180 Pine Avenue North
`Oldsmar, FL 34677
`anton.hopen@smithhopen.com
`Tel.: 813-925-8505
`
`Nicholas Pfeifer, Backup Counsel
`USPTO Reg. No. 70,568
`SMITH & HOPEN, P.A.
`180 Pine Avenue North
`Oldsmar, FL 34677
`nicholas.pfeifer@smithhopen.com
`Tel.: 813-925-8505
`
`/Yung-Hoon Ha/
`
`Yung-Hoon Ha
`
`Registration No. 56,368
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 156714531v.1
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00290; Docket No.: 0107131-00351 US2
`Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cosmin Maier
`
`PETITIONER’S LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Description
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,965,924
`
`Bravman Declaration
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,475,240 (“Sakamoto”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,100,817 (“Cederbaum”)
`
`Continued Prosecution Application Request dated February 10, 1999
`
`Amendment and Rule 131 Declaration dated January 5, 1998
`
`Office Action dated November 7, 1996
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,541,434 (“Nicholls”)
`
`Amendment dated June 9, 1997
`
`Office Action dated February 24, 1998
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,541,427 (“Chappell”)
`
`Amendment dated April 23, 1998
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,453,640 (“Kinoshita”)
`
`Amendment dated August 14, 1996
`
`C. Fred Hiatt, Jeffery W. Butterbaugh and David C. Gray, UV-Enhanced
`Etching of Sillicon Oxie by Cholorine Trifluoride, in PROCEEDINGS OF THE
`SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ULTRA-CLEAN PROCESSING OF
`SILICON SURFACES (Marc Heyns ed. 1994) (“Hiatt”).
`
`J. Seto, “The electrical properties of polycrystalline silicon films,” Journal
`of Applied Physics, 46 (1975) (“Seto”)
`
`Office Action dated April 17, 1996
`
`Compilation of Claim Construction Deadlines and Filings in DSS Tech.
`Mgm’t, Inc. v. Intel Corp. et al., 6:15-cv-00130-RWS (E.D. Tex.)
`Declaration Of Michael J. Summersgill In Support Of Motion For
`Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`Exhibit
`
`1101
`
`1102
`
`1103
`
`1104
`
`1105
`
`1106
`
`1107
`
`1108
`
`1109
`
`1110
`
`1111
`
`1112
`
`1113
`
`1114
`
`1115
`
`1116
`
`1117
`
`1118
`
`1119
`
`1120
`
`Declaration Of Louis W. Tompros In Support Of Motion For Admission
`
`ActiveUS 156714531v.1
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00290; Docket No.: 0107131-00351 US2
`Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Cosmin Maier
`
`Exhibit
`
`Pro Hac Vice
`
`Description
`
`1121
`
`
`
`Declaration Of Cosmin Maier In Support Of Unopposed Motion For
`Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`ActiveUS 156714531v.1
`
`7