`
`4. 2003
`
`3:
`
`us)
`
`6PM
`
`SOllliEl~|RCHElN
`
`'
`
`'"'—’NO.4934 ..——PA
`
`7—’_‘
`
`"'"
`
`i hereby certify that this correspondence is being sent via
`facsimile 703-305-738210 Examiner Chris C. cm at the
`United States Patent and rademark Office on
`
`9' */ 03
`
`ate of Facsimile
`
`Paul E. Bauch Ph.D
`Name of Applicant. assigns or
`Registe
`ntative
`atura
`
`5H? I 5°
`
`K
`M(A-W
`
`I
`
`Our File ‘No. 09799940-0011
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`In re Application of:
`James E. Nulty, et al. //.
`Serial No. 09/540,610 —_~'
`
`Examiner Chris O. Chu
`
`[D9
`
`l
`
`\/\_/g4~..r\/§-sf‘/\4~.a-4
`
`Filing Date: March 31, 2000
`
`For Method for Eliminating Lateral
`Spacer Erosion on Enclosed
`Contact Topographies During RF
`Sputter Cleaning
`
`Group Art Unit No. 2815
`
`AMENDMENT AND REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`Washington. DC. 20231
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`Responsive to the Official Action of September 11, 2002 Applicants respectfully
`
`request reconsideration in light of the following remarks.
`
`REMARKS
`
`Applicants would like to thank the Examiner for indicating withdrawal of the
`
`previous grounds of rejection.
`
`The present invention relates to a semiconductor device with well defined contact
`
`openings.
`
`in the past, the practice with respect to forming contact openings during the
`
`fabrication of semiconductor devices, particularly self-aligned contact openings, was to
`
`INTEL 1020 ~\
`
`
`
`MAR. 4.2003
`
`3:36PM
`
`soiiiitiiwtiil
`
`'
`
`"—N0.4934"“Pi
`
`8"” ““‘ '
`
`use etchants with high selectivity to protect underlying regions. However. the properties
`
`of a highly selective etch of the overlying etch layer can transform a substantially
`
`rectangular spacer adjacent to the contact region into a sloped spacer. Before the
`
`conductor materials are added to the contact opening. the opening was cleaned with a
`
`sputter etchant which can erode a portion of the sloped insulating spacer. Thus in
`
`conventional self-aligned contact structures, the diagonal thickness of the spacer, rather
`
`than the vertical thickness of the insulating layer. determined the minimum insulating
`
`layer thickness for the gate. sloping spacers limit the number of structures that can be
`included on a device.
`
`The present invention avoids this problem by retaining the substantially
`
`rectangular profile of the insulating spacers. The present invention includes at least one
`
`insulating spacer in the contact region and an etch-stop material over a first insulating
`
`layer and adjacent to the insulating spacer, the etch-stop material being a different
`
`material from the insulating spacer.
`
`The rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Dennison et al., in view
`
`of Figure, et al., and optionally further in view of Gonzalez. is respectfully traversed.
`
`Dennison, et al. includes spacers and caps which act as an etch-stop material with
`
`respect to the overlying BPSG layer and therefore must be made of silicon nitride in »
`
`order to function. The thin overlying layer 20 is described by Dennison et al. as a
`
`barrier layerwhich prevents diffusion from the BPSG layer. Figura, et al. describes
`
`oxide spacers, a silicon nitride etch-stop layer, and does not describe any barrier layers.
`
`Dennison at al. describes a method of forming a bit line over a capacitor array of
`
`memory cells. The semiconductor wafer of Dennison et al. has an array of electrically
`
`isolated word lines 12, 14, and 16 having insulating spacers and caps 18; the spacers V
`
`and caps preferably comprise an insulative nitride, such as Si3N.. (Figure 1; column 3.
`
`‘
`
`lines 25-36). A thin layer 20 of Si3N.. is provided atop the wafer to function as a diffusion
`
`barrier (column 3. lines 34-36). Dennison et al. is clear about the function ofall of
`
`these structures:
`
`The principal purpose of barrier layer 20 is to prevent diffusion of boron or
`phosphorous atoms from BPSG layer 28 into active areas 24 and 26.
`Caps [and spacers] 18 are preferably comprised of nitride (Si_-,N4) where
`
`
`
`MAR.
`
`4. 2003
`
`3:36PM
`
`soiiiii=_ii.<r.ii£iii"“""“_"""“"‘ _”‘ll0-4934 ‘i if ““
`
`layer 28 is comprised of oxide, such that the contact etch to produce first
`contacts 32 will stop relative to word lines spacers and caps 18.
`
`Accordingly, Dennison, gt al., indicates that the caps and spacers act as an etch-
`
`stop material with respect to the overlying BPSG layer. and therefore need to be formed
`
`' of a material such as silicon nitride. Dennison et al. also indicates that barrier layer 20
`
`functions to prevent diffusion from the overlying BPSG layer 28.
`
`Figure gt al. describes a method of forming contact areas between vertical
`
`conductors. A structure is described which includes transistor gate electrodes 22 which
`
`include gate insulating protective layer 28, and an insulating spacers 30 formed on
`
`either side of the gate electrodes (column 4. lines 6-10; Figure 1). The gate insulating
`
`V protective layer 28 and insulating spacers 30 are preferably made of silicon dioxide; the
`
`lower insulating layer 36 on top of these structures is made of BPSG (column 4, lines
`
`10-14; Figure 2).
`
`It is also noted that silicon nitride may be used instead of silicon
`
`dioxide for insulating protective layer 28 and spacers 30 (column 4, lines 22-24).
`
`Shown in Figure 3a, anietch-stop layer 43, made of silicon nitride or other suitable
`
`material. is deposited over lower insulating layer 36 (column 4, lines 50-53).
`
`Gonzalez has only been cited for a description of silicon dioxide spacers.
`
`The spacers and caps of Dennison, gt al. are required to act as an etch-stop
`
`material (see Dennison et al.. column 4, lines 6-10); the only etch-stop material
`
`described in any of the references is silicon nitride. Layer 20 in Dennison et al. is
`
`_
`
`described as a barrier layer for preventing diffusion; of all the references only Dengisgn,
`
`_q__a;L describes a barrier layer. and the only material described is silicon nitride.
`
`If one
`
`were to substitute silicon oxide for the caps and spacers in Dennison et al.. then they
`
`would not act as an etch-stop material with respect to the overlying BPSG layer, and
`therefore such a substitution would destroy their function. Accordingly. although
`
`Figura, et al. does describe a specific embodiment where an etch-stop layer is silicon
`
`nitride and caps and spacers are formed from silicon oxide, changing the composition of
`
`the caps and spacers in Qennison, et al. would defeat their function. Furthermore, there
`
`is no suggestion to replace the barrier layer 20 of Dennison, et al. with a different
`
`material--nothing else is suggested in any of the references which would provide a
`
`barrier function other than silicon nitride. Gonzalez does not provide any additional
`
`
`
`MAR. 4.2003
`
`3:37PM
`
`SONNEN9CHEill—"'
`
`'*—
`
`—--~——-
`
`----~——--—llo.4934——~l>.
`
`lo—— -
`
`teaching to cure this deficiency. Accordingly, Applicants submit that combining the
`
`references defeats the purpose of Qennison, et al.. and therefore the claimed invention
`
`is not obvious over the applied references. Withdrawal of this ground of rejection is
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`Applicants respectfully request that the Examiner contact the undersigned upon
`
`the indication of any allowable subject matter. Applicants submit the application is now
`
`in condition for allowance. Early notice of such action is earnestly solicited.
`
`Respec
`
`ly s%Lfmitted,
`
`aul E. Rauch, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Registration No. 38.591
`Attorney for Applicants
`
`SONNENSCHEIN NATH 8. ROSENTHAL
`P. 0. BOX 061080
`1
`WACKER DRIVE STATION, SEARS TOWER
`CHlCAGO, lL 60606
`(312) 876-8000