throbber
MAR.
`
`4. 2003
`
`3:
`
`us)
`
`6PM
`
`SOllliEl~|RCHElN
`
`'
`
`'"'—’NO.4934 ..——PA
`
`7—’_‘
`
`"'"
`
`i hereby certify that this correspondence is being sent via
`facsimile 703-305-738210 Examiner Chris C. cm at the
`United States Patent and rademark Office on
`
`9' */ 03
`
`ate of Facsimile
`
`Paul E. Bauch Ph.D
`Name of Applicant. assigns or
`Registe
`ntative
`atura
`
`5H? I 5°
`
`K
`M(A-W
`
`I
`
`Our File ‘No. 09799940-0011
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`In re Application of:
`James E. Nulty, et al. //.
`Serial No. 09/540,610 —_~'
`
`Examiner Chris O. Chu
`
`[D9
`
`l
`
`\/\_/g4~..r\/§-sf‘/\4~.a-4
`
`Filing Date: March 31, 2000
`
`For Method for Eliminating Lateral
`Spacer Erosion on Enclosed
`Contact Topographies During RF
`Sputter Cleaning
`
`Group Art Unit No. 2815
`
`AMENDMENT AND REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`
`Washington. DC. 20231
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`Responsive to the Official Action of September 11, 2002 Applicants respectfully
`
`request reconsideration in light of the following remarks.
`
`REMARKS
`
`Applicants would like to thank the Examiner for indicating withdrawal of the
`
`previous grounds of rejection.
`
`The present invention relates to a semiconductor device with well defined contact
`
`openings.
`
`in the past, the practice with respect to forming contact openings during the
`
`fabrication of semiconductor devices, particularly self-aligned contact openings, was to
`
`INTEL 1020 ~\
`
`

`
`MAR. 4.2003
`
`3:36PM
`
`soiiiitiiwtiil
`
`'
`
`"—N0.4934"“Pi
`
`8"” ““‘ '
`
`use etchants with high selectivity to protect underlying regions. However. the properties
`
`of a highly selective etch of the overlying etch layer can transform a substantially
`
`rectangular spacer adjacent to the contact region into a sloped spacer. Before the
`
`conductor materials are added to the contact opening. the opening was cleaned with a
`
`sputter etchant which can erode a portion of the sloped insulating spacer. Thus in
`
`conventional self-aligned contact structures, the diagonal thickness of the spacer, rather
`
`than the vertical thickness of the insulating layer. determined the minimum insulating
`
`layer thickness for the gate. sloping spacers limit the number of structures that can be
`included on a device.
`
`The present invention avoids this problem by retaining the substantially
`
`rectangular profile of the insulating spacers. The present invention includes at least one
`
`insulating spacer in the contact region and an etch-stop material over a first insulating
`
`layer and adjacent to the insulating spacer, the etch-stop material being a different
`
`material from the insulating spacer.
`
`The rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Dennison et al., in view
`
`of Figure, et al., and optionally further in view of Gonzalez. is respectfully traversed.
`
`Dennison, et al. includes spacers and caps which act as an etch-stop material with
`
`respect to the overlying BPSG layer and therefore must be made of silicon nitride in »
`
`order to function. The thin overlying layer 20 is described by Dennison et al. as a
`
`barrier layerwhich prevents diffusion from the BPSG layer. Figura, et al. describes
`
`oxide spacers, a silicon nitride etch-stop layer, and does not describe any barrier layers.
`
`Dennison at al. describes a method of forming a bit line over a capacitor array of
`
`memory cells. The semiconductor wafer of Dennison et al. has an array of electrically
`
`isolated word lines 12, 14, and 16 having insulating spacers and caps 18; the spacers V
`
`and caps preferably comprise an insulative nitride, such as Si3N.. (Figure 1; column 3.
`
`‘
`
`lines 25-36). A thin layer 20 of Si3N.. is provided atop the wafer to function as a diffusion
`
`barrier (column 3. lines 34-36). Dennison et al. is clear about the function ofall of
`
`these structures:
`
`The principal purpose of barrier layer 20 is to prevent diffusion of boron or
`phosphorous atoms from BPSG layer 28 into active areas 24 and 26.
`Caps [and spacers] 18 are preferably comprised of nitride (Si_-,N4) where
`
`

`
`MAR.
`
`4. 2003
`
`3:36PM
`
`soiiiii=_ii.<r.ii£iii"“""“_"""“"‘ _”‘ll0-4934 ‘i if ““
`
`layer 28 is comprised of oxide, such that the contact etch to produce first
`contacts 32 will stop relative to word lines spacers and caps 18.
`
`Accordingly, Dennison, gt al., indicates that the caps and spacers act as an etch-
`
`stop material with respect to the overlying BPSG layer. and therefore need to be formed
`
`' of a material such as silicon nitride. Dennison et al. also indicates that barrier layer 20
`
`functions to prevent diffusion from the overlying BPSG layer 28.
`
`Figure gt al. describes a method of forming contact areas between vertical
`
`conductors. A structure is described which includes transistor gate electrodes 22 which
`
`include gate insulating protective layer 28, and an insulating spacers 30 formed on
`
`either side of the gate electrodes (column 4. lines 6-10; Figure 1). The gate insulating
`
`V protective layer 28 and insulating spacers 30 are preferably made of silicon dioxide; the
`
`lower insulating layer 36 on top of these structures is made of BPSG (column 4, lines
`
`10-14; Figure 2).
`
`It is also noted that silicon nitride may be used instead of silicon
`
`dioxide for insulating protective layer 28 and spacers 30 (column 4, lines 22-24).
`
`Shown in Figure 3a, anietch-stop layer 43, made of silicon nitride or other suitable
`
`material. is deposited over lower insulating layer 36 (column 4, lines 50-53).
`
`Gonzalez has only been cited for a description of silicon dioxide spacers.
`
`The spacers and caps of Dennison, gt al. are required to act as an etch-stop
`
`material (see Dennison et al.. column 4, lines 6-10); the only etch-stop material
`
`described in any of the references is silicon nitride. Layer 20 in Dennison et al. is
`
`_
`
`described as a barrier layer for preventing diffusion; of all the references only Dengisgn,
`
`_q__a;L describes a barrier layer. and the only material described is silicon nitride.
`
`If one
`
`were to substitute silicon oxide for the caps and spacers in Dennison et al.. then they
`
`would not act as an etch-stop material with respect to the overlying BPSG layer, and
`therefore such a substitution would destroy their function. Accordingly. although
`
`Figura, et al. does describe a specific embodiment where an etch-stop layer is silicon
`
`nitride and caps and spacers are formed from silicon oxide, changing the composition of
`
`the caps and spacers in Qennison, et al. would defeat their function. Furthermore, there
`
`is no suggestion to replace the barrier layer 20 of Dennison, et al. with a different
`
`material--nothing else is suggested in any of the references which would provide a
`
`barrier function other than silicon nitride. Gonzalez does not provide any additional
`
`

`
`MAR. 4.2003
`
`3:37PM
`
`SONNEN9CHEill—"'
`
`'*—
`
`—--~——-
`
`----~——--—llo.4934——~l>.
`
`lo—— -
`
`teaching to cure this deficiency. Accordingly, Applicants submit that combining the
`
`references defeats the purpose of Qennison, et al.. and therefore the claimed invention
`
`is not obvious over the applied references. Withdrawal of this ground of rejection is
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`Applicants respectfully request that the Examiner contact the undersigned upon
`
`the indication of any allowable subject matter. Applicants submit the application is now
`
`in condition for allowance. Early notice of such action is earnestly solicited.
`
`Respec
`
`ly s%Lfmitted,
`
`aul E. Rauch, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Registration No. 38.591
`Attorney for Applicants
`
`SONNENSCHEIN NATH 8. ROSENTHAL
`P. 0. BOX 061080
`1
`WACKER DRIVE STATION, SEARS TOWER
`CHlCAGO, lL 60606
`(312) 876-8000

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket