`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Paper No. ___
`Date Filed: July 16, 2019
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`AMERIGEN PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED and
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC.
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2016-002861
`Patent 8,822,438 B2
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO EXPUNGE
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.56
`
`
`1 Case IPR2017-01317 was joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: IPR2016-00286
`U.S. Patent No. 8,822,438
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56 and the Board’s email authorization of July
`
`16, 2019, Patent Owner Janssen Oncology, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) respectfully
`
`requests that the Board expunge from the record Exhibits 2038, 2044, 2092, 2093,
`
`2094, and 2118—all of which contain Patent Owner’s confidential information—
`
`for the reasons set forth below. Patent Owner certifies that the parties have
`
`conferred in good faith, and Petitioners do not oppose this motion.
`
`II. BACKGROUND
`
`On January 31, 2018, Patent Owner filed a motion to seal Exhibits 2038 and
`
`2044 (which are the confidential versions of redacted Exhibits 2119 and 2115,
`
`respectively), and Exhibits 2092, 2093, 2094, and 2118 (which are confidential in
`
`their entirety). See Paper 87. All of the aforementioned exhibits contain Patent
`
`Owner’s confidential information. On February 13, 2018, the Board granted Patent
`
`Owner’s motion to seal. See Paper 89. Furthermore, the Board found that “[i]n
`
`rendering [its] Final Decision, it was not necessary to identify, nor discuss in
`
`detail, any confidential information.” Id. at 3. The Board ordered that the exhibits
`
`remain under seal until “the time period for filing a notice of appeal has expired or,
`
`if an appeal is taken, the appeal process has concluded.” Id.
`
`On December 19, 2018, Patent Owner filed a Notice of Appeal. Paper 93.
`
`On May 14, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case: IPR2016-00286
`U.S. Patent No. 8,822,438
`
`“Federal Circuit”) issued its opinion and judgment, and on June 20, 2019, the
`
`Federal Circuit issued its mandate.
`
`III. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.56 provides that “[a]fter denial of a petition to institute a trial
`
`or after final judgment in a trial, a party may file a motion to expunge confidential
`
`information from the record.” The Board has previously explained that a party
`
`moving to expunge has to show that: i) “any information sought to be expunged
`
`constitutes confidential information[;]” and ii) the movant’s interest in expunging
`
`the information “outweighs the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable file history.” RPX Corp. v. VirnetX Inc., IPR 2014-00171, Paper 62
`
`at 3 (P.T.A.B. Sept. 9, 2014). The regulations identify confidential information as
`
`“a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial
`
`information.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.54(a)(7). The Board must strike “a balance between
`
`the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history and
`
`the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive information.” 77 Fed. Reg. 48756,
`
`48760 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`IV. REASONS FOR THE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`In its order granting the motion to seal, the Board stated that “confidential
`
`information that is subject to a protective order ordinarily would become public 45
`
`days after final judgment in a trial, unless a motion to expunge is granted.” Paper
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case: IPR2016-00286
`U.S. Patent No. 8,822,438
`
`89 at 3. Accordingly, Patent Owner moves to expunge from the record the
`
`following sealed exhibits containing Patent Owner’s confidential information:
`
` Internal, non-public research summaries concerning the use of Patent
`
`Owner’s product: Exhibit 2092 (filed October 4, 2016); Exhibit 2093
`
`(filed October 4, 2016); Ex. 2094 (filed October 4, 2016).
`
` Internal, non-public technical research and development information
`
`concerning Patent Owner’s product: Exhibit 2118 (filed October 4,
`
`2016).
`
` Expert declarations and deposition transcripts referring to Patent Owner’s
`
`confidential information: Declaration of Matthew B. Rettig, M.D., Ex.
`
`2038 (filed October 4, 2016); Declaration of Christopher A. Vellturo,
`
`Ph.D., Exhibit 2044 (filed October 12, 2016).
`
`Patent Owner has already demonstrated, and the Board agreed, that Exhibits
`
`2038, 2044, 2092, 2093, 2094, and 2118 contain confidential information. Paper 89
`
`at 2. There has been no change in confidentiality of the information contained in
`
`these exhibits. Thus, Patent Owner has met its burden of showing that “any
`
`information sought to be expunged constitutes confidential information.” RPX,
`
`IPR2014-00171, Paper 62 at 3.
`
`In addition, Patent Owner’s interest in expunging the confidential
`
`information in Exhibits 2038, 2044, 2092, 2093, 2094, and 2118 “outweigh[s] the
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case: IPR2016-00286
`U.S. Patent No. 8,822,438
`
`public’s interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history.” Id. As
`
`stated in its Final Written Decision, the Board did not “identify, nor discuss in
`
`detail” the confidential information when rendering its decision. Paper 89 at 3. The
`
`public, therefore, has access to all the materials relevant to the merits of this
`
`proceeding, either through publicly filed papers and exhibits or through redacted,
`
`public versions of Exhibit 2038 (Declaration of Matthew B. Rettig, M.D. - Exhibit
`
`2119), and Exhibit 2044 (Declaration of Christopher A. Vellturo, Ph.D. - Exhibit
`
`2115). Given the confidential nature of the information in Exhibits 2038, 2044,
`
`2092, 2093, 2094, and 2118, good cause exists for the Board to expunge these
`
`exhibits pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`
`For the reasons set forth above, Patent Owner requests that the Board grant
`
`this motion and expunge confidential Exhibits 2038, 2044, 2092, 2093, 2094, and
`
`2118 from the record.
`
`July 16, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Dianne B. Elderkin/
`Dianne B. Elderkin (Reg. No. 28,598)
`delderkin@akingump.com
`Ruben H. Munoz (Reg. No. 66,998)
`rmunoz@akingump.com
`AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER &
`FELD LLP
`Two Commerce Square
`2001 Market Street, Suite 4100
`
`
`
`Case: IPR2016-00286
`U.S. Patent No. 8,822,438
`
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Tel: (215) 965-1200
`Fax: (215) 965-1210
`JANS-ZYTIGA@akingump.com
`
`David T. Pritikin (pro hac vice)
`dpritikin@sidley.com
`Paul Zegger (Reg. No. 33,821)
`pzegger@sidley.com
`Alyssa B. Monsen (pro hac vice)
`amonsen@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`787 Seventh Avenue
`New York, NY 10019
`Tel.: (212) 839-5300
`Fax: (212) 839-5599
`ZytigaIPRTeam@sidley.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case: IPR2016-00286
`U.S. Patent No. 8,822,438
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owner’s Motion to Expunge Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.56 was served on counsel of
`
`record on July 16, 2019 by filing this document through the End-to-End System, as
`
`well as delivering a copy via electronic mail to counsel of record for the Petitioners
`
`and Patent Co-Owner at the following addresses:
`
`William Hare - bill@miplaw.com
`Christopher Casieri - chris@miplaw.com
`Renita Rathinam - rathinam@miplaw.com
`
`Teresa Stanek Rea - TRea@Crowell.com
`Shannon M. Lentz - SLentz@Crowell.com
`
`Anthony C. Tridico - anthony.tridico@finnegan.com
`Jennifer H. Roscetti - jennifer.roscetti@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Dianne B. Elderkin/
`Dianne B. Elderkin
`(Reg. No. 28,598)
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Janssen Oncology, Inc.
`
`6
`
`
`
`July 16, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`