throbber
© 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com
`
`A R T I C L E S
`
`Glucocorticoids can promote androgen-independent growth
`of prostate cancer cells through a mutated androgen receptor
`
`XIAO-YAN ZHAO1, PETER J. MALLOY1, ARUNA V. KRISHNAN1, SRILATHA SWAMI1,
`NORA M. NAVONE2, DONNA M. PEEHL3 & DAVID FELDMAN1
`
`Departments of 1Medicine and 3Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
`2Department of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,
`Houston, Texas 77030, USA
`Correspondence should be addressed to D.F.; email: feldman@cmgm.stanford.edu
`
`The androgen receptor (AR) is involved in the development,
`growth and progression of prostate cancer1 (CaP). CaP often
`progresses from an androgen-dependent to an androgen-inde-
`pendent tumor, making androgen ablation therapy ineffective.
`However, the mechanisms for the development of androgen-
`independent CaP are unclear. More than 80% of clinically an-
`drogen-independent prostate tumors show high levels of AR
`expression1. In some CaPs, AR levels are increased because of
`gene amplification2 and/or overexpression, whereas in others,
`the AR is mutated3–5. Nonetheless, the involvement of the AR in
`the transition of CaP to androgen-independent growth and the
`subsequent failure of endocrine therapy are not fully under-
`stood. Here we show that in CaP cells from a patient who failed
`androgen ablation therapy, a doubly mutated AR functioned as
`a high-affinity cortisol/cortisone receptor (ARccr). Cortisol, the
`main circulating glucocorticoid, and its metabolite, cortisone,
`both equally stimulate the growth of these CaP cells and in-
`crease the secretion of prostate-specific antigen in the absence
`of androgens. The physiological concentrations of free cortisol
`and total cortisone in men6,7 greatly exceed the binding affinity
`of the ARccr and would activate the receptor, promoting CaP cell
`proliferation. Our data demonstrate a previously unknown
`mechanism for the androgen-independent growth of advanced
`CaP. Understanding this mechanism and recognizing the pres-
`ence of glucocorticoid-responsive AR mutants are important for
`the development of new forms of therapy for the treatment of
`this subset of CaP.
`
`Two CaP cell lines with different karyotypes, MDA PCa 2a and 2b,
`recently established from a bone metastasis from a patient whose
`CaP showed androgen-independent growth, have been character-
`ized8,9. Here, we investigated the mechanism of androgen-
`independent growth of the MDA PCa 2b cells. Initial experiments
`using radioligand binding assays with tritiated dihydrotestos-
`terone (DHT), the main prostatic androgen, showed decreased
`binding by the androgen receptor (AR). Scatchard analyses of the
`binding of 3H-DHT (Fig. 1a) showed that MDA PCa 2b cells ex-
`pressed ARs at levels similar to those seen in LNCaP cells (a well-
`characterized, AR-expressing human CaP cell line derived from a
`lymph node (LN) metastasis10), but had a reduced affinity for
`DHT, to about 2% (dissociation constant (Kd) = 23.3 ± 3.3 nM (n =
`3) for MDA PCa 2b; Kd = 0.5 nM for LNCaP). Correspondingly,
`MDA PCa 2b cells required higher concentrations of DHT for
`growth stimulation (Fig. 1b) than did LNCaP cells, which typi-
`cally have a bi-phasic growth response to androgens10. DHT also
`induced secretion of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in MDA PCa
`
`NATURE MEDICINE • VOLUME 6 • NUMBER 6 • JUNE 2000
`
`2b cells, with an effective concentration for half-maximum re-
`sponse (EC50) of 100 nM DHT (compared with 0.5 nM in LNCaP
`cells) (data not shown). These findings demonstrate that MDA
`PCa 2b cells express a low-affinity AR that is less responsive to
`DHT than the AR in LNCaP cells in promoting growth and
`secretion of PSA.
`Sequencing of the entire coding region of the AR gene from
`MDA PCa 2b cells demonstrated two missense mutations in the
`ligand-binding domain that changed leucine at position 701 to
`histidine (L701H) and threonine at position 877 to alanine
`(T877A). As the AR gene is on the X chromosome and as these
`cells contain only a single X chromosome9, the two mutations
`must be on the same allele. Consistently, sequencing analyses of
`RT–PCR products showed that these two mutations were in the
`same AR mRNA molecule. Thus, this case differs from a pub-
`lished case in which the two mutations were not found in the
`same tissue11.
`The AR T877A mutation has been identified in LNCaP cells13
`and in some advanced CaP cases3–5. The effects of this mutation
`on AR function have been well documented13. Although the AR
`L701H mutation has also been identified in metastatic CaP spec-
`imens11,12, the biological consequences of this mutation, like
`those of most AR mutations discovered in metastatic CaP, have
`not been characterized mainly because of a limited supply of
`tumor tissue and the difficulty in establishing CaP cell lines.
`To determine the individual and combined effects of these
`mutations on AR function, we recreated the singly mutated AR
`cDNAs L701H and T877A and AR cDNA with both mutations,
`L701H&T877A. We expressed the wild-type and mutant AR pro-
`teins in COS-7 and CV-1 cells and assessed their 3H-DHT-bind-
`ing and transactivation properties. The T877A mutant bound
`DHT with high affinity (Kd = 0.38 ± 0.04 nM), similar to the
`wild-type AR (Kd = 0.20 ± 0.07 nM) (Fig. 1c). In contrast, the
`L701H mutant failed to show substantial DHT binding. The
`L701H&T877A double mutant, however, had an affinity for
`DHT of 2% (Kd =11.80 ± 2.00 nM) that of wild-type AR. In trans-
`activation assays using the androgen-responsive luciferase (Luc)
`reporter pMMTV–Luc, the T877A mutant had an EC50 of 0.04
`nM DHT, similar to that of the wild-type AR (Fig. 1d), whereas
`the L701H mutant had an EC50 of 10 nM, and the
`L701H&T877A mutant had an EC50 of 0.4 nM. Western blot
`analyses showed that the expression levels of each mutant AR in
`transfected cells were similar (data not shown). The luciferase
`assay (Fig. 1d) is more sensitive than the radioligand binding
`assay (Fig. 1a and c). Both assays indicate that the L701H muta-
`tion decreases the ability of AR to bind and respond to DHT,
`
`Amerigen Exhibit 1138
`Amerigen v. Janssen IPR2016-00286
`
`703
`
`© 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com
`
`

`
`A R T I C L E S
`
`© 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com
`
`The doubly mutated AR shows decreased androgen binding and
`Fig. 1
`responsiveness. a, Scatchard analysis of 3H-DHT binding in LNCaP cells
`(쑗; Kd = 0.5) and MDA PCa 2b cells (쎲; Kd = 23). b, Growth response to
`DHT. Control levels (100%) correspond to 8.25 µg and 2.96 µg DNA per
`well for LNCaP cells (쑗) and MDA PCa 2b cells (쎲), respectively. Data rep-
`resent means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). c, Scatchard analysis of 3H-DHT binding to
`wild-type AR (쏔), AR T877A (왖) and AR L701H&T877A (쐽) expressed in
`COS-7 cells. d, Transactivation assays. CV-1 cells were transiently trans-
`fected with pMMTV–Luc and AR expression vectors, as well as pRL–SV40
`(Renilla luciferase) to normalize for transfection efficiency. Cells were then
`treated with DHT and relative luciferase activity (RLA) was determined. 쏔,
`wild-type; 왖, T877A; 쏆, L701H; 쐽, L701H&T877A. Data represent ‘fold
`induction’ over control (no added ligand). The s.e.m. did not exceed 10%
`for each treatment.
`
`a
`
`b
`
`c
`
`d
`
`tion response was with cortisol, and the response of the
`L701H&T877A mutant to cortisol was much greater (300%)
`than that of the L701H mutant. Thus, the L701H mutation con-
`fers cortisol responsiveness to the AR, and the unique profile of
`hormone response by the L701H&T877A mutant reflects the
`combined effects of the two mutations.
`As the L701H&T877A mutant showed a greater response to
`cortisol than to DHT in the transactivation assays (Fig. 2a), we re-
`examined the binding properties of this mutant using 3H-cortisol
`as the ligand. The L701H&T877A mutant had a specific, sat-
`urable and high-affinity binding site for cortisol with a Kd of 4.8
`± 0.1 nM (Fig. 2b). This binding affinity was 1,000% greater than
`the affinity showed by the human glucocorticoid receptor α for
`cortisol (Kd = 50 nM), which we assayed at the same time. Our
`value is consistent with the Kd reported before14. In transactiva-
`tion assays using the pMMTV–Luc reporter (Fig. 2c), the
`L701H&T877A mutant had an EC50 of about 1 nM cortisol, and
`the L701H mutant had a substantial response to cortisol at a con-
`centration of 10–50 nM. Neither the T877A mutant nor the wild-
`type AR was responsive to cortisol.
`In competition binding assays using 3H-cortisol as the ligand,
`
`Fig. 2 The recreated AR mutants show broadened ligand specificity. a, CV-1
`cells were transfected with AR expression vectors (above graphs), the
`pMMTV–Luc reporter and pRL–SV40 (Renilla luciferase), and were treated with
`1 nM or 10 nM DHT (DHT1 and DHT10), or 10 nM hydroxyflutamide (Flu),
`progesterone (P4), 17β-estradiol (E2), aldosterone (Aldo) or cortisol. Relative
`luciferase activity (RLA) was assayed. WT, wild-type. b, Specific 3H-cortisol
`binding (left) and Scatchard analysis (right) of the L701H&T877A mutant ex-
`pressed in COS-7 cells, showing total binding (쎲), specific binding (open cir-
`cles) and nonspecific binding (왖). The calculated Kd is 4.7 nM (r2 = 0.969).
`c, Transfected CV-1 cells were treated with cortisol, and relative luciferase ac-
`tivity (RLA) was determined. 쏔, wild-type; 왖, T877A; 쏆, L701H; 쐽,
`L701H&T877A. d, CV-1 cells were co-transfected with pMMTV–Luc and ex-
`pression vectors for human glucocorticoid receptor α pSG5-GRα (cross-
`hatched bars) or the L701H&T877A mutant AR (쐽) along with pRL-SV40. Cells
`were then treated with 10 nM cortisol, cortisone or dexamethasone (DEX).
`Data represent relative luciferase activity (RLA; means ± s.e.m.; n = 3) due to
`cortisone or DEX, as a percent of the cortisol-induced activity (set as 100%).
`
`and that ligand binding and androgen responsiveness can be
`partially restored by the acquisition of the T877A mutation.
`As the T877A mutant has a much broader ligand binding pro-
`file than the wild-type AR (ref. 13), we examined the transacti-
`vation response of each mutant AR to ligands of the class I
`nuclear receptors, including DHT, progesterone, 17β-estradiol,
`aldosterone and hydrocortisone (cortisol), as well as an anti-
`androgen hydroxyflutamide. As predicted from the earlier stud-
`ies13, the T877A mutant had substantial transactivation
`responses to progesterone, 17β-estradiol and hydroxyflutamide
`(Fig. 2a). The L701H mutant responded to DHT and, unexpect-
`edly, to cortisol. The L701H&T877A mutant, however, was acti-
`vated by all of the ligands except aldosterone. Correspondingly,
`aldosterone had low binding affinity for the L701H&T877A mu-
`tant in competition binding assays. The maximum transactiva-
`
`a
`
`b
`
`c
`
`d
`
`© 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com
`
`704
`
`NATURE MEDICINE • VOLUME 6 • NUMBER 6 • JUNE 2000
`
`

`
`© 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com
`
`A R T I C L E S
`
`a
`
`b
`
`c
`
`Fig. 3 Glucocorticoids promote growth and secretion of PSA in MDA
`PCa 2b cells. a, Western blot analyses. MCF-7 cells express both gluco-
`corticoid receptors α and β (ref. 20). Above blot, cell lines. Right mar-
`gin, expected proteins and sizes. GR, glucocorticoid receptor. b and
`c, Cells were grown in the presence of 0, 1, 10 or 100 nM cortisol (0, F1,
`
`F10 and F100) or 10 nM cortisone (E10) in media ‘stripped’ of endoge-
`, LNCaP; 쐽, MDA PCa 2b. b, Growth, measured by de-
`nous steroids.
`termining the DNA content in each sample. c, PSA levels in the
`conditioned media. Data represent means ± s.e.m. (n = 3). *, P < 0.05,
`compared with control.
`
`the L701H&T877A mutant had the highest affinity for cortisol
`(100%) and cortisone (100%), followed by R1881 (a synthetic
`androgen; 65%), DHT (41%), dexamethasone (18%), hydrox-
`yflutamide (16%), 17β-estradiol (11%), progesterone (8%), aldos-
`terone (less than1%) and bicalutamide (an anti-androgen; less
`than1%). Its binding profile for glucocorticoids differs from that
`of the human glucocorticoid receptor α in that the latter had a
`higher affinity for dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid (Kd
`= 2.2 nM) than cortisol, the natural glucocorticoid. The
`L701H&T877A mutant also responded to many C19 and C21
`steroids that circulate in the human bloodstream (data not
`shown), which further distinguishes it from other nuclear hor-
`mone receptors. Cortisone, which is a natural metabolite of cor-
`tisol and is inactive for human glucocorticoid receptor α,
`activated the L701H&T877A mutant as efficiently as cortisol
`(Fig. 2d). This experiment used CV-1 cells, which are deficient in
`11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase15, the enzyme that converts
`cortisone to cortisol. Thus, the combination of the L701H
`and T877A mutations effectively transforms the AR into a corti-
`sol/cortisone receptor (ARccr), allowing glucocorticoids to acti-
`vate androgen-responsive genes in CaP.
`To test the effects of cortisol and cortisone on MDA PCa 2b
`cells, we first determined whether these cells express glucocorti-
`coid receptor, by western blot analysis. Glucocorticoid receptor
`α was undetectable in MDA PCa 2b cells (Fig. 3a); however, these
`cells did express glucocorticoid receptor β (Fig. 3a), a truncated
`form of glucocorticoid receptor that does not bind glucocorti-
`coids or mediate transactivation16. In growth studies using
`androgen-free media (Fig. 3b), both cortisol and cortisone stimu-
`lated MDA PCa 2b cell proliferation in a dose-dependent man-
`ner. In contrast, neither hormone had any growth-stimulatory
`effect on LNCaP cells (Fig. 3b), which do not express glucocorti-
`coid receptor α and do not respond to dexamethasone17.
`Furthermore, secretion of PSA, a marker of androgen action, was
`increased by both cortisol and cortisone in MDA PCa 2b cells but
`not in LNCaP cells (Fig. 3c). MDA PCa 2a cells also responded
`to cortisol and cortisone stimulation (data not shown). Our
`results show that in these CaP cells, cortisol and cortisone, acting
`the doubly mutated ARccr, promote androgen-
`through
`independent growth and PSA secretion.
`Glucocorticoid activation of a mutated AR may be one of
`
`many potential pathways by which CaP cells escape androgen
`dependence. The mutations described here, L701H by itself or
`in combination with T877A, convert the AR into a receptor that
`responds to glucocorticoids by stimulating cell growth and acti-
`vating androgen-responsive genes, including PSA. PSA is an an-
`drogen-dependent marker of CaP progression, and serum PSA
`levels positively correlate with tumor burden in patients18. Our
`findings indicate the possibility that PSA secretion in some an-
`drogen-independent CaPs may reflect glucocorticoid or other
`hormone stimulation instead of androgen stimulation of the
`AR. Glucocorticoids circulate at high levels with most cortisol
`bound to transcortin. In men, the circulating levels of free corti-
`sol (15–45 nM) and total cortisone (39–63 nM) do not decline
`with age6,7. These concentrations exceed the Kd (4.8 nM) of the
`ARccr receptor and are high enough to sufficiently activate both
`the L701H mutant and the double-mutant ARccr in transactiva-
`tion assays. Therefore, these circulating glucocorticoids could
`substantially activate mutant ARs in vivo and promote andro-
`gen-independent growth of CaP. We are now testing this using
`animal models.
`To appreciate the frequency with which glucocorticoids pro-
`mote androgen-independent CaP growth in patients, the preva-
`lence of these AR mutations in metastatic CaP needs to be
`determined. Although the cells in distant metastases, after andro-
`gen ablation fails, often contain AR mutations1–5, metastatic
`tissues are not routinely biopsied, and therefore are not
`readily available.
`In conclusion, we have characterized mutations in the AR that
`may account for a previously unknown mechanism for andro-
`gen-independent growth of CaP. Although AR mutants with a
`variety of ‘promiscuities’ exist, the recognition of these glucocor-
`ticoid-responsive ARs (L701H or L701H&T877A) is an important
`step in the development of new forms of therapy for the treat-
`ment of this subset of androgen-independent CaP.
`
`Methods
`Cell culture, cell proliferation and PSA assays. LNCaP and MDA PCa 2b
`cells were maintained as described8,9. Cell proliferation assays were done 6 d
`after 5 × 104 cells were seeded per 35-mm well and cultured in RPMI-1640
`medium supplemented with 5% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and
`the steroids being studied. Determination of DNA content/well was used as
`an index of cell proliferation, as described8. PSA levels in the conditioned
`
`NATURE MEDICINE • VOLUME 6 • NUMBER 6 • JUNE 2000
`
`705
`
`© 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com
`
`

`
`A R T I C L E S
`
`© 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com
`
`media were determined by the TOSOH assay, an automated immunoenzy-
`mometric assay system (TOSOH Medics, Foster City, California).
`
`Sequencing of genomic DNA. Genomic DNA was isolated from MDA PCa
`2b cells, and each exon of the AR gene was amplified by PCR using intronic
`primers19. The PCR products were cloned and DNA was sequenced by the
`core facility at Stanford University. The data were analyzed using the GCG
`software (GCG, Madison, Wisconsin). Three independent clones from two
`preparations of DNA were tested, and the same mutations were found
`each time.
`
`Sequencing of cDNA after RT–PCR. Total RNA was isolated from MDA PCa
`2b cells and cDNA was made using the MuLV reverse transcriptase and an
`oligo-dT16 primer (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, New Jersey). Two
`gene-specific primers (AR2401, 5′–ACTCTGGGAGCCCGGAAGCTG–3′; and
`AR3294, 5′–AATGCTTCACTGGGTGTGGAA–3′) were used to amplify an in-
`tact AR ligand binding domain (exons D–H) by PCR. The RT–PCR product
`was an 893-base-pair fragment encompassing the AR coding sequence, nu-
`cleotides 2401–3294. The RT–PCR products were inserted into a cloning
`vector, TA-vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, California). A total of 36 clones
`were screened, and 15 had the 893-base-pair insert. Each positive clone was
`sequenced in both directions. Every clone contained both L701H and
`T877A mutations.
`
`Site-directed mutagenesis. Mutations were recreated in the AR cDNA
`in pSG5-AR (from Z. Culig). pSG5–GR was provided by P. Kushner. The
`mutants were generated using the GeneEditor in vitro Site-Directed
`Mutagenesis System (Promega). The mutagenic oligonucleotides (Operon
`Technologies, Alameda, California) used were 5′–GCAGCCTTGCACTC-
`for L701H and 5′–GCATCAGTTCGCTTTTGACCT–3′
`TAGCCTC–3′
`for
`T877A (mutated bases are underlined). Final constructs were sequenced to
`confirm the mutations.
`
`Transfection and luciferase assay. Plasmids were transfected into CV-1
`(for transactivation) or COS-7 (for ligand binding) monkey kidney cells
`using lipofectamine (Life Technologies). After this transfection, the CV-1
`cells were treated with various ligands for 24 h and luciferase activity was
`measured using the dual-luciferase assay system (Promega). The experi-
`ment was done three times using triplicate wells for each treatment.
`Triplicate wells contained 1.25 µg pMMTV–Luc (from R. Evans), 0.625 µg
`expression vectors for AR or glucocorticoid receptor α, and 5 ng pRL-SV40
`(as a control for transfection efficiency).
`
`Radioligand binding, Scatchard analysis and competition binding as-
`says. The recreated AR L701H&T877A mutant was expressed in COS-7
`cells. Binding assays using 3H-DHT, 3H-cortisol and 3H-dexamethasone, as
`well as Scatchard analyses using these steroids, were done as described8.
`High-salt extracts (200 µl at a concentration of 0.5–1 mg protein/ml) were
`incubated with 0–100 nM labeled ligand for 16–20 h at 0 °C. Bound and
`free hormones were separated by hydroxylapatite. Specific binding was cal-
`culated by subtracting nonspecific binding obtained in the presence of a
`250-fold excess of unlabeled ligands from the total binding measured in the
`absence of unlabeled ligands. Competition binding analyses of the double-
`mutant AR were done in the presence of 20 nM 3H-cortisol with unlabeled
`ligands at an excess of 1-fold to 100-fold. The relative ability of various
`compounds to inhibit 50% of 3H-cortisol binding is expressed as the relative
`binding affinity value, with cortisol set at 100%.
`
`Western blot analysis. Cell extracts containing 50 µg of protein were sep-
`arated by 4–12% gradient SDS–PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose
`
`membranes. The blots were probed with polyclonal antibodies against AR,
`glucocorticoid
`receptors
`(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz,
`California), and actin (Sigma). Peroxidase-conjugated goat antibody
`against rabbit IgG (Zymed, South San Francisco, California) was used as
`secondary antibody. The signal was detected using enhanced chemilumi-
`nescence (ECL; Amersham).
`
`Statistical analysis. For Fig. 3b and c, the ANOVA Scheffe’s F test was used
`to assess statistical significance of differences between the treated group and
`the untreated controls, using the StatView 4.5 program (Abacus Concepts,
`Berkeley, California). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
`
`Acknowledgments
`We thank A. Hoffman and T. Stamey for critical reading of the manuscript.
`This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the
`American Institute for Cancer Research and the US Army Medical Research
`Acquisition Activity (to D.F.).
`
`RECEIVED 9 DECEMBER 1999; ACCEPTED 24 APRIL 2000
`
`1. Trapman, J. & Brinkmann, A.O. The androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Path. Res.
`Pract. 192, 752–760 (1996).
`2. Visakorpi, T. et al. In vivo amplification of the androgen receptor gene and progres-
`sion of human prostate cancer. Nature Genet. 9, 401–404 (1995).
`3. Taplin M.E. et al. Mutation of the androgen-receptor gene in metastatic androgen-
`independent prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 332, 1393–1398 (1995).
`4. Gaddipati, J. et al. Frequent detection of codon 877 mutation in the androgen re-
`ceptor gene in advanced prostate cancers. Cancer Res. 54, 2861–2866 (1994).
`5. Gottlieb, B., Beitel, L.K., Lumbroso, R., Pinsky, L., & Trifiro, M. Update of the andro-
`gen receptor gene mutations database. Hum. Mutat. 14,103–114 (1999).
`6. Van Cauter, E., Leproult, R. & Kupfer, D.J. Effects of gender and age on the levels and
`circadian rhythmicity of plasma cortisol. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81, 2468–2473
`(1996)..
`7. Walker, B.R., Best, R., Noon, J.P., Watt, G.C. & Webb, D.J. Seasonal variation in glu-
`cocorticoid activity in healthy men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 4015–4019 (1997).
`8. Zhao X.Y. et al. Two mutations identified in the androgen receptor of the new
`human prostate cancer cell line MDA PCa 2A. J. Urology 162, 2192–2199 (1999).
`9. Navone, N.M. et al. Establishment of two human prostate cancer cell lines derived
`from a single bone metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 3, 2493–2499 (1997).
`10. Horoszewicz, J.S, et al. LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 43,
`1809–1818 (1983).
`11. Suzuki, H. et al. Androgen receptor gene mutations in human prostate cancer. J.
`Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 46, 759–765 (1993).
`12. Watanabe, M. et al. Genetic alterations of androgen receptor gene in Japanese
`human prostate cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 389–393 (1997).
`13. Veldscholte, J. et al. A mutation in the ligand binding domain of the androgen re-
`ceptor of human LNCaP cells affects steroid binding characteristics and response to
`anti-androgens. Biochem. Biophy. Res. Commun. 173, 534–540 (1990).
`14. Roux, S. et al. Mutation of isoleucine 747 by a threonine alters the ligand responsive-
`ness of the human glucocorticoid receptor. Mol. Endocrinol. 10,1214–1226 (1996).
`15. Warriar, N., Page, N. & Govindan, M.V. Transcription activation of mouse mammary
`tumor virus-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase: a model to study the metabolism of
`cortisol. Biochemistry 33, 12837–12843 (1994).
`16. Hollenberg, S.M. et al. Primary structure and expression of a functional human glu-
`cocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature 318, 635–641 (1985).
`17. Cleutjens, C.B. et al. Both androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor are able to
`induce prostate-specific antigen expression, but differ in their growth-stimulating
`properties of LNCaP cells. Endocrinology 138, 5293–5300 (1997).
`18. Stamey, T.A. et al. Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma
`of the prostate. New Engl. J. Med. 317, 909–916 (1987).
`19. Lubahn, D. et al. Sequence of the intron/exon junctions of the coding region of the
`human androgen receptor gene and identification of a point mutation in a family
`with complete androgen insensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 9534–9538
`(1989).
`20. Oakley, R.H., Webster, J.C., Sar, M., Parker, C.R.Jr., & Cidlowski, J.A. Expression and
`subcellular distribution of the beta-isoform of the human glucocorticoid receptor.
`Endocrinology 138, 5028–5038 (1997).
`
`© 2000 Nature America Inc. • http://medicine.nature.com
`
`706
`
`NATURE MEDICINE • VOLUME 6 • NUMBER 6 • JUNE 2000

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket