throbber
11/14/2016
`
`157911-172
`
`Published on Meeting Library (http://meetinglibrary.asco.org)
`Home > 157911-172
`
`Prospective evaluation of the response to prednisone-dexamethasone switch in castration-resistant prostate
`cancer patients treated with abiraterone pre- and post-docetaxel.
`
`Meeting:
`2016 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
`
`Category:
`Genitourinary Cancer
`
`Subcategory:
`Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease
`
`Session Type and Session Title:
`Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers
`
`Abstract Number:
`327
`
`Citation:
`J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl 2S; abstr 327)
`
`Author(s):
`Nuria Romero-Laorden, Elena Castro, Rebeca Lozano, M Isabel Sáez, Jeannette Valero, Floortje Van de Poll, M
`Paz Nombela, Juan Francisco Rodriguez-Moreno, A. Montesa, Gala Grau, Leticia Rivera, David Olmos;
`Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain; Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid,
`Spain; IBSAL, Servicio Oncología Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; CNIO-IBIMA
`Genitorurinary Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen de la Victoria & Regional de
`Málaga, Malaga, Spain; Clara Campal Comprehensive Cancer Center, HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain; Prostate
`Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
`
`Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) administered with prednisone (P) to reduce mineralocorticoid-related
`adverse events improves survival in CRPC with a favourable tolerance profile. However, in the phase I/II of AA
`without steroids, dexamethasone 0,5mg/day was added after biochemical progression reaching a 25% of PSA
`decline. Lorente et al (BJC, 2014) showed durable biochemical responses in 40% of cases treated with AA and
`steroid switch in the post-docetaxel setting. We hypothesize that P to D switch in patients with biochemical
`progression to AA+P would lead to secondary responses also in the pre-docetaxel setting. Methods: Change of
`P 5mg/12h to D 0.5mg/24h was prospectively tested in clinically stable CRPC with biochemical progression ( >
`25% PSA rise over nadir, confirmed in a second determination) and/or limited radiological progression ( < 3
`new bone/lymphatic metastasis, non-bulky), after ³12 weeks of AA+P. PSA was monitored q4wks. CT- & bone-
`scans were performed every 12-16 weeks. Biochemical and radiological responses were evaluated by PSAWG2
`and RECIST criteria. Survival outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 18 patients were
`included (11 pre- & 7 post-docetaxel). Median age 72 (60-85); visceral, bone and/or lymph metastasis were
`present in 17%, 83% and 50% of patients. Median PSA at AA+P and AA+D commencement was 81 ng/ml and
`100ng/ml, respectively. Biochemical response was observed in 83% of patients: 56% with a PSA decrease ≥
`30%, and 28% with PSA decrease ≥ 50%. Median biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) with AA+P
`was 5.7 months (CI95% 2.9-9.1) and 3.8m (CI95% 1.4-6.5) in the pre- and post-docetaxel setting, respectively.
`Median bPFS with AA+D was 5.4m (1.2-8.8) and 2.5 (CI95% 1.1-2.9) in the pre- and post-docetaxel settings.
`Two radiological partial responses were observed with AA+D. Conclusions: Clinically stable patients with
`Amerigen Exhibit 1130
`Amerigen v. Janssen IPR2016-00286
`
`http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/print/2132571
`
`1/2
`
`

`
`11/14/2016
`
`157911-172
`
`limited disease progression after AA+P may benefit from steroid switch in both the pre- and post-docetaxel
`settings.
`
`Source URL: http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/content/157911-172
`
`http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/print/2132571
`
`2/2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket