throbber
ophthalmoplegia, and ptosis developed in 20% of cases of
`cavernous sinus thrombosis,6 but prompt treatment has
`eradicated these complications. Occasionally, traumatic
`carotid cavernous fistulas produce bilateral acute signs,
`including orbital bruits and visual loss. The history usually
`makes the diagnosis obvious.’ Inflammatory causes include
`pseudotumour and Wegener’s granulomatosis, which are less
`acute than cellulitis and respond dramatically to steroids.
`Blodi and Gass8 emphasised that pseudotumour is rarely
`bilateral and that this finding may indicate underlying
`systemic disease.9 Metastatic disease, usually from breast,
`lung, or kidney, may present with orbital signs, but in a series
`of 227 patients only 2 were bilatera1.lO
`The cardinal features of dysthyroid eye disease are orbital
`lid
`and
`and
`retraction,
`congestion,
`proptosis,
`lag
`ophthalmoplegia. The condition is usually chronic and
`bilateral and accompanied by ocular discomfort. Optic
`neuropathy occurs in only 5% of patients with Graves’
`disease." Visual loss is usually insidious, the symptoms and
`signs suggesting compression of the optic nerve. Symptoms
`include visual loss, flashing lights, and constricted fields.
`Poor colour vision and an afferent pupillary defect confirm
`optic nerve dysfunction. The visual fields may show central
`scotomas (94%) or arcuate defects, usually inferior (61%), but
`occasionally superior as well, to produce constricted fields. 12
`Optic disc swelling is an important sign. Most patients with
`dysthyroid eye disease have general clinical evidence of
`thyroid dysfunction.13-19 However, in one series 5% of
`patients with an ophthalmopathy were clinically euthyroid,
`though investigation of these patients showed evidence of
`disordered thyroid regulation. 17,20,21
`The orbital CT22 scan is a vital investigation in the diagnosis
`ofthese patients. Although patients with pseudotumour may
`have orbital myositis the affected muscles are diffusely
`thickened near their insertions. In dysthyroid eye disease
`generalised extraocular muscle enlargement is common, and
`Moseley and Sanders18 have emphasised that this occurs
`mainly towards the orbital apex, accounting for optic nerve
`involvement. The orbital CT scan appearances of grossly
`enlarged extraocular muscles prompted revision of the
`diagnosis to dysthyroid eye disease in the two cases reported
`here, even though the patients were clinically euthyroid. The
`scan also distinguished dysthyroid disease from invasive or
`other inflammatory conditions of the orbit and confirmed
`that the paranasal sinuses were clear.
`The immunology of dysthyroid eye disease is complex.
`Kodarma et a123 have reported a circulating autoantibody
`against soluble ocular muscle antigen in patients with
`ophthalmic Graves’ disease but not in those with thyrotoxicosis
`or goitre.
`Both patients had high titres of thyroglobulin and
`microsomal antibodies, and one had the haplotype B35,
`previously reported with severe dysthyroid ophthalmopathy.24
`A dramatic response to steroids occurred in both patients,
`consistent with their known effect on immunoglobulin
`production and release oflysosomal enzymes. Although auto-
`antibodies are usually not thought to cause tissue damage in
`dysthyroid eye disease it is tempting to postulate such a role in
`these patients with acute ophthalmopathy and to speculate
`about a viral infection as a precipitating factor.
`We thank Dr D. Croft, under whose care patient 2 was admitted, and Mr N.
`Sarkies who referred patient 1; Miss Josephine Lace for secretarial assistance;
`and Mr Richard Dewhirst for preparing the figures.
`
`Correspondence should be addressed to M. D. S., Medical Eye Unit, St
`Thomas’ Hospital, Shel.
`
`433
`
`Preliminary Communication
`
`KETOCONAZOLE THERAPY FOR ADVANCED
`PROSTATE CANCER
`
`JOHN TRACHTENBERG
`
`ALLAN PONT
`
`Department of Surgery/Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto,
`Canada; and Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of San
`Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
`
`Summary
`
`Fifteen patients with biopsy-proven prostate
`cancer were treated with ketoconazole
`400 mg every 8 h. Two patients withdrew from therapy, one
`for personal reasons and one because a paraspinal mass
`developed. The other thirteen patients completed at least 6
`months of therapy. Ketoconazole greatly reduced the need
`for analgesics; serum prostatic acid phosphatase levels fell to
`normal, and testosterone levels were reduced. After 6 months
`thirteen of fourteen evaluable patients were in remission. The
`side-effects of ketoconazole therapy were limited.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`PROSTATE cancer accounts for 18% of all clinically
`detected cancers and for 10% of all cancer-related deaths in
`
`T. J. K. LEONARD AND OTHERS: REFERENCES
`
`1. Docherty PTC. Acute endocrine exophthalmos. BrJ Ophthalmol 1976; 60: 482-85.
`2. Falta W. Die Erbrankungen d Blutdrussen Berlin Springer, 1913; 50.
`3. Dock G Diseases of the thyroid gland: Eyes. In: Osler W, McCrae T, eds System of
`medicine London: Oxford University Press, 1915; 862.
`4. Snow IE. Jakobiec FA, Nolan BT. Patient examination and introduction to orbital
`disease. In: Duane TD, Jaeger EA, eds. Clinical ophthalmology vol 2. Philadelphia:
`Harper and Row, 1982: 1-30.
`5. Watters EC, et. al Acute orbital cellulitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 94: 785-88
`6. Jakobiec FA. Orbital inflammations. In. Duane TD, Jaeger EA, eds. Clinical
`ophthalmology vol 2 Philadelphia: Harper and Row, 1982: 51-53.
`7. Jakobiec FA, Jones IS. Vascular tumours, malformations and degenerations. In: Duane
`TD, Jaeger EA, eds. Clinical ophthalmology vol 2. Philadelphia: Harper and Row,
`1982: 35-37
`8. Blodi FC, Gass JDM. Inflammatory pseudotumour of the orbit Br J Ophthalmol 1968;
`52: 79-93
`9. Spalton DJ, Graham EM, Page NGR, Sanders MD. Ocular changes in limited forms of
`Wegener’s granulomatosis Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 553-63.
`10. Ferry A, Font R. Carcinoma metastatic to the eye and orbit. 1. A clinicopathologic
`study of 227 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1974; 92: 276-86.
`11. Werner SC, Ingbar SH. The thyroid. A fundamental and clinical test, 3rd ed. New
`York Harper and Row, 1971; 536.
`12. Trobe JD, Glaser JS, La Flamme P. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol
`1978, 96: 1199-209.
`13. Munro RE, Lamki L, Row VV, Volpe R. Cell mediated immunity in the exophthalmos
`of Graves’ disease as demonstrated by the migration inhibiting factor (MIF) test. J
`Clin Endocrinol Metab 1973, 37: 286-92.
`14 Solomon DH, Chopra JJ, Chopra U, Smith FJ. Identification of subgroups of euthyroid
`Graves’s ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 181-86.
`15. Volpe R. The role of autoimmunity in hypoendocrine function; with special emphasis
`on autoimmune thyroid disease Ann Intern Med 1977, 87: 86-99.
`16 Hamilton RD, Mayberry WE, McConahey WM, Hanson KC. Ophthalmopathy of
`Graves’ disease: a comparison between patients treated surgically and patients
`treated with radioiodide. Mayo Clin Proc 1967; 42: 812-18.
`17. Hesch D, Huefner M, Von Zurmuhlen A, Emrich D Truodothyronine levels in
`patients with euthyroid endocrine exophthalmos and during treatment of
`thyrotoxicosis. Acta Endocrinol 1974; 75: 514-22.
`18. Wyse EP, McConahey WM, Woolner LB, Scholz DA, Kearns TP. Ophthalmopathy
`without hyperthyroidism in patients with histological Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. J
`Clin Endocrinol Metab 1968; 28: 1623-29.
`19 Schultz RD, Van Allen MW, Blodi FC Endocrine ophthalmoplegia. Arch Ophthalmol
`1960; 63: 217-25
`20 Morney R, Fournier G, Berthezene F. Ophthalmic Graves’ disease. Mod Prob
`Ophthalmol 1975; 14: 426-31
`21. Adams DD, Kennedy TH. Evidence to suggest that LATS protector stimulates the
`human thyroid gland J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1971; 33: 47-51.
`22. Sergott RC, Feldberg NT, Savino PJ. Association of HLA antigen with severe Graves’
`ophthalmopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1983; 24: 124.
`23. Kodarma K, Sikorsk AH, Bandy Defoc P, et al. Demonstration of circulating auto-
`antibody against soluble eye muscle antigen in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Lancet 1982;
`ii: 1353-56
`24. Moseley IF, Sanders MD Computerised tomography in neuro-ophthalmology.
`London Chapman and Hall, 1982; 21-23.
`
`Amerigen Exhibit 1097
`Amerigen v. Janssen IPR2016-00286
`
`

`
`434
`
`TABLE I-ADMISSION STATUS OF PATIENTS
`
`*Measured by radioimmunoassay and expressed in ng/ml III patients 1-5
`ng/ml); measured by enzymic assay and expressed in IU/1 in
`(normal <3-4
`patients 6-15 (normal <I -1 IU/1).
`
`males.’
`1941, Huggins and Hodges reported that
`In
`hormonal manipulation could benefit patients with prostate
`cancer.2 It is now established that in 70-80% of patients with
`metastatic prostate cancer the disease regresses or stabilises
`when serum testosterone levels are lowered. 1,4 In clinical
`practice, testosterone levels are reduced by orchidectomy or
`by diethystilboestrol treatment. Bilateral orchidectomy may
`be psychologically unacceptable; and diethylstilboestrol can
`have side-effects such as gynaecomastia, fluid retention,
`thromboembolism, and myocardial ischaemia.6 Thus, other
`methods of lowering testosterone levels are being sought.
`Ketoconazole (’Nizoral’, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse,
`Belgium) is an imidazole derivative which is active after oral
`administration against various pathogenic fungi in man.’ It is
`inhibitor of testicular and adrenal
`steroid
`potent
`synthesis.8,9 In patients taking ketoconazole for serious
`fungal disease high doses and frequent administration of the
`drug suppressed testosterone levels throughout the day. 10
`Therefore, ketoconazole seemed to have a potential use in the
`management of prostate cancer. It has the advantage over
`of also
`used
`adrenal
`lowering
`currently
`treatments
`androgens. 11 Our
`initial
`showed
`that
`case-report
`ketoconazole was objectively and subjectively beneficial in a
`patient with advanced disease. 12
`This study was designed to define the efficacy of high-dose
`ketoconazole in patients with stage D-2 previously untreated
`prostate carcinoma.
`
`a
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`,
`
`Patients were eligible for study if they had biopsy-proven prostate
`cancer; pain; extrapelvic metastases as shown by bone scan or
`radiographs, high prostatic acid phosphatase level, or both; and no
`previous endocrine manipulations, chemotherapy, steroid therapy,
`or radiotherapy. All patients gave written informed consent. The
`
`study was approved by local’ and federal human research
`committees.
`Ten patients were studied in Toronto and five in San Francisco
`(table I). All fifteen had bony metastases and patients 4, 12, and 13
`took 400 mg
`All
`had urinary-tract
`patients
`obstructions.
`ketoconazole every 8 h by mouth. They were assessed clinically and
`biochemically every week for 4 weeks and once a month for 6
`months. Clinical evaluation included assessment of pain, activity,
`urological symptoms, and side-effects. Blood was drawn for
`blood count,
`determination of prostatic
`acid phosphatase,
`electrolytes, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, calcium, phosphorus,
`liver and kidney function tests, and serum testosterone and
`Serum
`androstenedione,
`ketoconazole
`concentrations.
`dehydroepiandrosterone, luteinising hormone (LH), corticotropin,
`and 24 h urine cortisol results have been reported elsewhere. 13
`Serum prostatic acid phosphatase was determined by enzymic
`assay14 in the Toronto patients and by radioimmunoassay (Roche
`Biochemical, Columbus, Ohio) in the San Francisco patients.
`Serum biochemistry tests were done with the multichannel analyser
`in the clinical laboratory. Serum testosterone was measured by
`radioimmunoassay. Results in San Francisco were originally
`expressed in ng/dl and have been converted to nmol/1 by multiplying
`by 0-03467. Normal testosterone levels for this population are
`10-35 nmol/1. Bone scans and electrocardiograms were repeated
`after 6 months of therapy.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Thirteen of the fifteen patients completed at least 6 months
`of therapy. One patient who experienced pain relief and a
`drop in prostatic acid phosphatase withdrew after 1 month
`for personal reasons. The other patient who withdrew
`initially had a normal prostatic acid phosphatase level and a
`histologically undifferentiated tumour; he had excellent pain
`relief for 3 months. A paraspinal mass, presumably from
`prostate cancer, then developed and the patient was assigned
`to conventional therapy.
`After 2 weeks of therapy, pain which had previously
`required narcotic analgesics had greatly diminished in all
`fifteen patients. Most patients had no further pain after 3
`Eight patients have completely stopped taking
`days.
`analgesics; three take acetominophen occasionally, and three
`require acetominophen-codeine preparations intermittently.
`After 1 month, three patients who had needed help with
`Severe
`ambulation could walk unaided.
`urinary-tract
`in
`the
`obstruction was relieved
`with
`three
`patients
`obstructions. Digital rectal examinations showed softening of
`prostatic tissue in all patients and disappearance of evidence
`of primary tumour in six patients.
`Prostatic acid phosphatase fell rapidly in the thirteen
`patients with initially raised levels (table II). After 6 weeks of
`therapy, the level was normal in nine of the thirteen. The
`level varied greatly in patient 1, who had difficulty in
`complying with therapy.
`After 1 week of ketoconazole therapy testosterone levels
`had declined to <3 - 5 nmol/1 in thirteen patients in multiple
`samples measured throughout the day. At 1 month, the levels
`
`-
`
`TABLE II-EFFECT OF KETOCONAZOLE
`
`n=15 to day 30, 14 for days 60 and 90, 13 for day 180.
`*Normal values for prostatic acid phosphatase by radioimmunoassay <3’4 4 ng/ml, by enzymic assay < I -1 1 IU/1.
`t In five San Francisco patients; normal=4-18 mIU/ml.
`
`

`
`had generally risen slightly but remained below 3 - 5 nmol/1 in
`seven of twelve patients in whom they were measured.
`Adrenal androgens were suppressed or undetectable in
`thirteen patients. LH levels rose with therapy in all patients
`(table II).
`Bone scans done after 6 months’ therapy showed that no
`patient had any new lesions. Nine of the thirteen patients had
`regression of some but not all lesions. In the one patient who
`had apparent progression of disease (paraspinal mass), no
`new lesions were visible on the bone scan at 3 months. No
`cardiac or thromboembolic events occurred during therapy
`and electrocardiograms did not change. Electrolytes, serum
`calcium and phosphorus, and blood count remained normal
`or improved. Transient rises in aspartate aminotransferase
`were seen in six patients, but all patients had normal liver
`function at 2 months despite continuing therapy. Serum
`cholesterol fell significantly in all patients (mean before
`treatment 176&plusmn;8 mg/dl, 139&plusmn;6 mg/dl at6 months).
`Mild transient nausea occurred in two patients and all
`patients experienced diminished libido or impotence, but the
`side-effects did not require that therapy be stopped in any
`patient. Slight non-tender gynaecomastia developed in three
`patients. After 3 months of ketoconazole therapy, two
`patients had symptoms suggesting mild Addison’s disease
`(darkening of skin and weakness). Urinary cortisol was
`borderline low and corticotropin raised in both patients.
`in amelioration of
`resulted
`Prednisone (5 mg daily)
`symptoms.
`
`. DISCUSSION
`
`Responses to androgen-ablative therapy, the primary
`treatment for advanced prostate cancer, average 18 months,
`and 25% of patients live 3 years. Several aspects of
`endocrine therapy remain controversial. Should only patients
`with symptoms be treated? Is reduction of adrenal androgens
`important? How can testosterone levels best be lowered?
`Both orchidectomy and diethylstilboestrol
`effectively
`lower testosterone levels. However, neither affects adrenal
`androgen production. Diethylstilboestrol therapy can be
`effects,6, 16 and
`associated with serious
`cardiac
`toxic
`orchidectomy is psychologically unacceptable to many
`patients. Thus, other means of lowering or blocking
`have been explored-gonadotropin-releasing
`androgens
`hormone agonists,17 aminoglutethimide,18 and flutamide.19
`testicular and adrenal steroid
`Ketoconazole inhibits
`synthesis by blocking a variety of P-450 enzyme systems.20,21
`At doses currently licensed for the treatment of fungal disease
`(200-400 mg daily), the antisteroid effects are clinically
`minor.8,9
`with
`doses
`and
`high
`frequent
`However,
`administration, ketoconazole suppresses testosterone levels
`azoospermia.10
`and
`400 mg
`induces
`In
`study
`our
`ketoconazole every 8 h persistently lowered testosterone and
`adrenal androgens13in patients with prostate cancer;
`testosterone fell to anorchid levels (<2
`nmol/1) within 72 h.
`Some patients subsequently experienced a moderate rise in
`testosterone, but the level generally remained below 3.55
`nmol/1. Initial analysis suggests that the slight rise in
`testosterone is LH-mediated (table II).
`The clinical response to ketoconazole has been exciting.
`After 6 months of therapy, thirteen of fourteen evaluable
`patients are in remission. The side-effects of therapy have
`been limited, but supplementary steroid therapy may be
`for some patients
`this
`of
`taking
`dosage
`necessary
`ketoconazole. Further research will define which patients
`with prostate cancer will derive greatest benefit from
`ketoconazole. The drug may be useful as sole therapy for
`
`435
`
`especially those with cardiac disease.
`many patients,
`Ketoconazole may also be beneficial in combination with
`gonadotropin-releasing-hormone agonists.22 It could help
`prevent the transient rise in testosterone levels induced by
`these agents22 and reduce adrenal androgen production.
`We thank Jane Loosli, San Francisco, and Kathleen Bryan, Toronto, for
`coordinating the study; and Dr Andrew Bruce, Dr William Kerr, Dr Norman
`Struthers, Dr Michael Robinette, Dr Williams Rider, Dr Richard Cohen, Dr
`Ira Sharlip, Dr David A. Stevens, Dr Richard Williams, and Dr John
`Masterson for helpful suggestions and referral of patients. Mr Robert
`Legendre and Dr Alain Raoult of Janssen Pharmaceutica (USA and Canada)
`provided encouragement and financial support for this study.
`
`Correspondence should be addressed to A. P., 3905 Sacramento Street, Suite
`101, San Francisco, California 94118, USA.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Cancer Statistics, 1984. American Cancer Society. Ca 1984; 34: 7-23.
`2. Huggins C, Hodges CV. Studies in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1941; 1: 293-97.
`3. Robinson MRG, Shearer RG, Ferguson JD. Adrenal suppression in the treatment of
`prostate carcinoma. Br J Urol 1974; 46: 555-59.
`4. Resnick MI, Grayhack JT. Treatment of stage IV carcinoma of the prostate. Urol Clin
`North Am 1975; 2: 141-61.
`5. Alder A, Burger H, Davis J, et al. Carcinoma of prostate: response of plasma luteinising
`hormone and testosterone to oestrogen therapy. Br Med J 1968; i: 28-31.
`6. Veteran’s Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group. Treatment and
`survival in patients with carcinoma of the prostate. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1967; 124:
`1011-17.
`7. Restrepo A, Stevens DA, Utz JP, eds. First International Symposium on Ketoconazole.
`Rev Infect Dis 1980; 2: 519-699.
`8. Pont A, Williams PL, Azhar S, et al. Ketoconazole blocks testosterone synthesis. Arch
`Intern Med 1982; 142: 2137-40.
`9. Pont A, Williams PL, Loose DS, et al. Ketoconazole blocks adrenal steroid synthesis.
`Ann Intern Med 1982; 97: 370-72.
`10. Pont A, Graybill JR, Craven PC, et al. Effect of high dose ketoconazole on adrenal and
`testicular function Clin Res 1983; 31: 91 (abstr).
`11. Pont A, Williams PL, Loose DL, et al. Ketoconazole inhibits adrenal steroid synthesis.
`Clin Res 1982; 30: 99 (abstr).
`12. Trachtenberg J, Halpern N, Pont A. Ketoconazole: a novel and rapid treatment for
`advanced prostatic cancer. J Urol 1983; 130: 152-53.
`13. Pont A, Trachtenberg J. Hormonal changes in patients on chronic high dose
`ketoconazole. Clin Res 1984; 32: 271 (abstr).
`14. Li CY, Chuda RA, Lamb WKW, Yam LT. Acid phosphatase in human plasma. J Lab
`Clin Med 1973; 82: 446-48.
`15. Walsh PC. Physiologic basis for hormonal therapy in carcinoma of the prostate. Urol
`Clin North Am 1975; 2: 125-40.
`16. Byar DP. Veterans Administration Cooperative Urologic Research Group. Treatment
`and survival of patients with cancer of the prostate. Cancer 1973; 32: 1126-30.
`17. Trachtenberg J. The treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with a potent luteinizing
`hormone releasing hormone analogue. J Urol 1983; 129: 1149-52.
`18. Worgul TJ, Santen RJ, Samojlik E, et al. Clinical and biochemical effect of
`aminoglutethimide in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1983;
`129: 51-55.
`19. Sogani PC, Whitmore WF Jr. Experience with flutamide in previously untreated
`patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. J Urol 1979; 122: 640-43.
`20. Loose DS, Kan PB, Hirst MA, et al. Ketoconazole blocks adrenal steroidgenesis by
`inhibiting cytochrome P-450 enzymes. J Clin Invest 1983; 71: 1495-99.
`21. Santen RJ, Van den Bossche H, Symoens J, et al. Site of action of low dose ketoconazole
`on androgen biosynthesis in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983; 57: 732-36.
`22. Allen JM, Kerle DJ, Ware H, et al. Combined treatment with ketoconazole and
`luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue: a novel approach to resistant
`progressive prostate cancer. Br Med J 1983; 287: 1766.
`
`"A physician treating a colleague needs to give time and to deliver his
`normal standard of good care; he may have to state clearly that
`normal routine management is being observed. Where several
`physicians are involved communication between them must be
`excellent so that the doctor-patient is assured that all are agreed on
`the plan of management. The doctor-patient knows that there is
`often a high degree of personal judgement in clinical decisions and he
`needs to understand the logic behind them. For a full understanding
`of the disorder, the concept of disease has to be discussed; detailed
`education about the condition might be necessary, just as for any
`other patient. Explanations must be honest and full. As for any
`patient, however, only a few new opinions should be introduced at a
`time so that self-esteem is not undermined. All doctors ought to
`know a general practitioner with whom they can have a professional
`is
`confidentiality
`that
`relationship,
`physician-to-patient
`so
`safeguarded, emotional problems can be aired and better long-term
`care can be provided. The ’corridor-consultation’ should be avoided
`because the doctor-patient is then denied the physician’s full
`attention, and poor communication could be the result."-I. G.
`FINLAY. Doctors as patients. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 1984; 34: 416.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket