throbber
10'3f2016
`
`AtjraiBrona: a stay r:lsclrillc lni"'CPo'allcn and commti'Cial partnership- The llllllllut& cf Cmcer RIIIMRch, L.cndon
`
`I C R The Institute of
`--
`
`Cancer Research
`
`Making the discoveries that defeat cancer
`
`---
`
`Donate now)
`
`Abiraterone: a story of scientific innovation and
`commercial partnership
`
`-11
`2014 -
`
`MAY
`
`Abiraterone is one of the ICR's biggest success stories - the first treatment shown to be effective in men
`with advanced prostate cancer. In 2012 it was made available on the NHS, at a stroke transforming the
`options available for the 10,000 men each year diagnosed with aggressive forms of prostate cancer. In
`the current financial year alone, abiraterone is forecast to earn the ICR £10m in royalties, all of which will
`be ploughed back into our research.
`
`But the road from abiraterone's initial concept to today's life-extending treatment was not always smooth
`and highlights the importance of maintaining focus on a critical stage in the ICR's work- the
`commercialisation of the cancer drugs we discover. Without commercialisation, we would fail in an
`essential part of the ICR's mission, in delivering new cancer treatments to patients.
`
`This article details the key stages in abiraterone's almost 20-year history from initial idea to cancer drug
`in the clinic. It draws out some of the key learning points from its discovery and development, so that the
`ICR can not only reproduce the success of abiraterone, but can speed the journey from our next major
`discovery to the clinic.
`
`The initial idea
`
`Abiraterone's journey began in the 1990s, when a team of ICR scientists began to look for ways of
`shutting off production of male androgen sex hormones. Prostate cancer relies on testosterone to grow,
`so one of the main ways doctors treat the disease is by blocking its action. Over time most patients'
`cancers stop responding to standard hormone treatments and many scientists believed the cancers had
`learned how to grow without testosterone. The ICR's Professor Mike Jarman, and colleagues Dr Elaine
`Barrie and Professor Gerry Potter, began investigating an alternative theory - that these prostate
`cancers were using testosterone from elsewhere in body to grow, and might therefore still be treated by
`disrupting testosterone synthesis.
`
`The team, working in what is now the cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, started with a drug
`called ketoconazole, which they noticed prevented the growth of prostate cancer cells. The drug worked
`by inhibiting an enzyme called CYP17, which is important in the production of male sex hormones.
`Ketoconazole proved to be not very potent, not sufficiently specific and quickly broken down by the body,
`so the team set out to design new more effective inhibitors of the CYP17 enzyme.
`
`We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use this website,
`you are agreeing to our use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie oolicy. You can change your
`cookie setlinas at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
`
`)(
`
`htlp:/!Www.la-.ac.LJclnews...feeUeellaiBst-faahn&lablraiBrona-a-stay-r:l-aclantlftc-IIYICMI!Icn-and-commerclal-partnershlp
`
`119
`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2097
`Amerigen v. Janssen IPR2016-00286
`
`

`

`Abi raterone: a stay of scientific inmwalion S'ld can mercial partnership - The Institute cl Cancer Research, Londoo
`
`101312016
`The search was rewarded when Professor Potter and Dr Barrie designed and evaluated a chemical
`called CB7598, which they called abiraterone. The drug specifically and irreversibly blocked CYP17, and
`prevented testosterone being made anywhere in the body.
`
`Patenting and early commercialisation
`
`The ICR team filed the first of its patents on abiraterone in 1992, on the usefulness of the compound as a
`potential cancer treatment, and followed that with a second patent the following year covering its
`synthesis. A year later the team published the first paper describing the drug, its rationale as a cancer
`treatment and how it was synthesised.
`
`The decision to patent and its timing were key to the abiraterone success story, and opened the door to
`the drug's commercialisation. The ICR assigned rights for the development of abiraterone to British
`Technology Group, an international specialist healthcare company. Jennifer Hodgson, Business
`Development Manager in the ICR's Enterprise Unit, explains: "The critical step in commercialisation of
`abiraterone was the filing of the two patents from this initial research. A key role for the ICR's Enterprise
`Unit is in deciding when to file a patent. Patents only last for 20 years. If we file too early we reduce the
`number of years we can receive royalties because it takes a while for commercialisation to occur. It is
`because of these initial patents that we are now entitled to royalties from abiraterone. Protecting our
`intellectual property for licensing is one of the most important roles of the Enterprise Unit and we
`encourage researchers doing work with commercial implications to get in touch at an early stage."
`
`Early studies
`
`The next step for the ICR team was to turn the chemical they had designed into a medicine that could be
`taken by patients. Professor Mitch Dowsett, Dr Barrie and others showed in animal and cancer cell
`models that the drug worked as expected, blocking synthesis of androgens and reducing their levels in
`the body and the size of androgen-dependent organs. These and other early studies were important as
`they demonstrated the drug was safe, effective and ready to be evaluated in patients. Professor Potter
`and Dr lan Hardcastle then scaled up the small amounts of the drug used in the lab into a quantity and
`purity suitable for patient use.
`
`In 1996 BTG out-licensed abiraterone to the German pharmaceutical company Boehringer lngelheim,
`and initial Phase I clinical trials began. Early-stage clinical trials in prostate cancer led by Professor lan
`Judson, with pharmacodynamic studies carried out by Dr Florence Raynaud, showed that abiraterone did
`hit the correct target and lower levels of male hormones. However, early in the drug's development
`concerns were raised about the possible side-effects of blocking CYP17 - in particular about the risk of
`adrenal insufficiency, a potentially life-threatening complication. The developmental progress was further
`hampered by a lack of interest in hormone treatments for prostate cancer. Part of the problem lay in the
`name of late-stage prostate cancer, which was often referred to as 'refractory' disease, implying the
`cancer became resistant to androgens and could progress without them. Many scientists and clinicians
`argued that blocking androgen production at this late stage would be ineffective. These concerns led to
`Boehringer withdrawing from the development of abiraterone, with the licence returning to BCG.
`
`But the scepticism surrounding the drug was challenged when Professor Johann de Bono joined the ICR
`from San Antonio, Texas, in 2003. Professor de Bono recognised the potential of abiraterone as a
`treatment for men with advanced prostate cancer, and reasoned that late-stage prostate cancer was not
`
`We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use this website,
`you are agreeing to our use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie policv. You can change your
`cookie settinas at anytime but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
`
`X
`
`ht!p:llwww.icr .ac.IJ</nB'Ns-featuresllatast-features/abi raterone-a-stay-ct-scienlific-i nrJOVali!ll-and-com mercial-partnership
`
`2J9
`
`

`

`Abi raterone: a stay of scientific inmwalion S'ld can mercial partnership - The Institute cl Cancer Research, Londoo
`101312016
`Licensing and clinical trials
`
`In 2004, BTG licensed abiraterone to Ortho Biotech Oncology Research and Development, a unit of
`Cougar Biotechnology Inc., granting worldwide exclusive rights to develop and commercialise
`abiraterone. In doing so the ICR gained the financial backing it needed to run the clinical trials now
`required to prove the drug's efficacy and safety.
`
`"Licensing is a critical step in the commercialisation process," explains Toby Richardson, Senior Business
`Development Manager in the Enterprise Unit. ·ucensing gives a company permission to own our
`property. Our number one goal is to ensure patients benefit as quickly as possible from our innovations.
`The Enterprise Unit has good links with a range of companies and has cover 40 years of collective
`experience and expertise in negotiating. Collaborations can take a long time but the ICR has strong
`record of success.
`
`"The ICR has the highest amount of invention income per faculty head in the UK- more than twice the
`organisation in second place. But it's not only the ICR who benefits. The Rewards for Innovators Scheme
`means that the researchers involved in the development of abiraterone are also entitled to a share of the
`royalties.
`
`With support from Cougar, Professor de Bono, Dr Gert Attard and colleagues began phase I clinical trials
`to test abiraterone's safety and anti-tumour activity.
`
`The first phase I study of abiraterone in patients with advanced prostate cancer was run by the ICR and
`The Royal Marsden. The small study involved 21 men and found that the drug appeared safe in humans
`and that the majority of patients who took it experienced both significant tumour shrinkage and dramatic
`falls in PSA levels.
`
`Less than a year later, the results of a larger phase 1/11 study were reported. This study of 54 patients
`confirmed the phase I results, and showed that up to 70 per cent of men responded to abiraterone.
`These men experienced significant benefits for an average of eight months, with scans showing their
`tumours decreased in size and their PSA levels dropped substantially.
`
`Following these very positive results, the giant US pharmaceutical company Johnson & Johnson agreed
`to buy Cougar for just under £600million, gaining access to the drug as it progressed through phase Ill
`evaluation. And in 2010, a pivotal phase Ill trial showed that patients given abiraterone lived on average
`15.8 months longer, compared with 11.2 months for men taking a placebo. This part of abiraterone's
`story is an exemplar of how basic molecular studies, followed by collaborations between researchers,
`doctors and industry, can lead to the successful development of effective drugs that can transform lives.
`
`We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use this website,
`you are agreeing to our use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie policv. You can change your
`cookie settinas at anytime but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
`
`X
`
`ht!p:llwww.icr .ac.IJ</nB'Ns-featuresllatast-features/abi raterone-a-stay-ct-scienlific-i nrJOVali!ll-and-com mercial-partnership
`
`

`

`100120'16
`
`Abiral8r<lne: a sby r:l scinfic imwation and ccmmercial partnership- The lnsti . . r:l Cancer R...-ch, London
`
`Approval and acceptance by NICE
`
`There was now strong clinical trial evidence for the effectiveness of abiraterone, but there remained
`some significant hurdles in gaining regulatory approval for the drug. The ICR had to play an active role in
`the regulatory process to make sure abiraterone was made available to as many patients as possible.
`
`The first step was the submission to a new drug application to the US Food and Drug Administration,
`leading to the approval of abiraterone in the US.
`
`Hodgson says: "Approval in the US was a significant step in abiraterone's development. Both the ICR and
`BTG received a milestone payment, together with the royalties that followed on worldwide sales of
`abiraterone. •
`
`Later in 2011, the European Medicines Authority also licensed abiraterone. That opened the door to the
`drug being made available in the UK, but accessing it on the NHS continued to rely on local decisions by
`primary care trusts, or access via the Govemmenfs new NHS Cancer Drugs Fund. Abiraterone became
`one of the most requested drugs on the Cancer Drugs Fund, as anticipation grew that it would shortly be
`accepted by NICE.
`
`However, in February 2012, NICE announced that it was minded to reject abiraterone on cost grounds
`unless more data were forthcoming or a better price was offered. The decision came as a significant
`blow to the ICR and to men with prostate cancer across the UK We responded to the NICE appraisal
`
`We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use this website,
`you are agreeing to our use of cookies on your device as desaibed in our cookie policy. You can change your
`cookie seUJngs at any 1fme but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
`
`X
`
`

`

`Abiraterone: a story of scientific innovation and commercial partnership- The Institute of Cancer Research, London
`1013.12016
`The end-of-life criteria are more lenient guidelines, developed by NICE, which should be followed when
`reviewing treatments which may extend the lives of patients who are terminally ill. The guidelines cover
`drugs which would normally be deemed too expensive for standard NHS use and which are licensed for
`a terminal illness affecting a small number of patients with less than two years to live. Cancer Research
`UK estimated 7,000 men would be eligible for abiraterone and thought this number low enough for the
`drug to be assessed under the end-of-life guidance.
`
`In IVIay 2012, NICE and Janssen finally reached an agreement over cost, and the drug was made
`available on the NHS in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Since then, abiraterone has gained a
`further licence for the treatment of prostate cancer before chemotherapy, opening up the prospect that it
`will be made available for even more men.
`
`The path from abiraterone's discovery to its commercialisation was long and winding, but it was ultimately
`a major success story for the ICR demonstrating how partnership with industry can deliver real benefits
`for patients.
`
`)I Twoot g+ Snare J
`
`11 Comments
`
`The ICR
`
`• Recommend
`
`12t Share
`
`•
`
`Join the discussion ...
`
`8 Login
`
`Sort by Newest
`
`Alan Meyer • 2 years ago
`We know that patented drugs have huge and increasing price tags. However no one ever
`explains why? Is the drug difficult to manufacture? Does a month's supply of the drug cost
`something close to $7,000 to manufacture? Or is it $700, or even $70? The drug
`manufacturers would never say and would argue that, in addition to manufacturing and
`distribution, the money is needed to pay for the high cost of clinical trials and research.
`
`The drug company argument is at least partially valid. Clinical trials and other startup costs
`are expensive, though in more and more cases the actual research is paid for by government
`agencies like the NCI in the US and ICR in the UK, from taxes on all of us. But drug
`companies, like computer companies and car companies and all other commercial
`companies, are in business to make money -which requires charging the highest price that
`the market will bear. This is normal capitalism and it works well for computers and cars, but it
`doesn't work so well when the product is not something that people can elect to buy or not, or
`to buy from this vendor or that. What is being sold is life. The alternative is death.
`
`We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use this website,
`you are agreeing to our use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie oolicv. You can change your
`cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
`
`X
`
`htlp:llwww.icr.ac.uk/news-faah.lresllatest-fealureslabiraterone-a-story-of-scientifio-innovalion-and-commercial-partnership
`
`

`

`101312016
`
`Abi raterone: a stay of scientific inmwalion S'ld can mercial partnership - The Institute cl Cancer Research, Londoo
`
`they could come up with something better than an unregulated free market.
`3 ""
`• Reply • Share>
`v
`
`Stephen B. Strum • 2 years ago
`,.
`I agree with DavidS. As a medical oncologist in the PC {prostate cancer) field since 1983,
`there is also a glaring omission of a trial that compares the efficacy of HDK {high-dose
`ketoconazole) at a cost of $180 per month with abiraterone acetate {Zytiga) at a monthly cost
`on average of $7,700. Both work on the adrenal axis, both lower testosterone, but HDK also
`has been shown to have a direct cytotoxic effect, whereas I do not believe any study
`involving Zytiga has shown this. Moreover, there are publications showing that ketoconazole
`blood levels are associated with tumor response. It always amazes me how the "almighty"
`dollar seems to dominate so much of our "civilized" world.
`1 ""
`• Reply • Share>
`v
`
`Lucy Mendoza~ Stephen B. Strum • 2 years ago
`,.
`I am writing you from Mexico City. My husband is 81 years old with prostate cancer
`since 2001. He has good quAlity life now, but is what they call refractary to the
`ZOLADEX treatment he was having before. this drug Zytiga was recommended for
`the future. It is TERRIBLY expensive I understand. Perhaps the Insurance Co., might
`pay for it but in your commentary you talk about HDK which perhaps sounds much
`more amicable to his system. I will keep your information Stephen and give it to our
`doctor. I agree with you and with David B, it is amazing what the costs of these
`medicines amount to. God bless you all. Lucy Mendoza.
`1 ""
`• Reply • Share >
`
`v
`
`DavidB • 2 years ago
`,.
`The issue that this article does not discuss is the high price of abiraterone. I'm immensely
`lucky that my health insurer is paying for me, but I believe that others (especially people
`without insurance) have not been so fortunate. What's the point of having such a great
`treatment if it's restricted to a fortunate few?
`2 ""
`• Reply • Share>
`
`v
`
`,.
`
`willstai n ~ DavidB • 1 0 months ago
`Especially as it was developed by public contributions to the ICR from the British
`public. Medicine is no longer the caring institution that it once was, now it's all about
`cost & profit. (I'm on abiraterone by the way, it's just starting to be ineffective after 22
`months.)
`• Reply • Share >
`
`""
`
`v
`
`DavidB ~ willstain • 10 months ago
`
`,.
`
`We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use this website,
`you are agreeing to our use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie policv. You can change your
`cookie settinas at anytime but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
`
`X
`
`ht!p:llwww.icr .ac.IJ</nBW"s-featuresllatast-features/abi raterone-a-stay-ct-scienlific-i nrJOVali!ll-and-com mercial-partnership
`
`

`

`101312016
`
`Abi raterone: a stay of scientific inmwalion S'ld can mercial partnership - The Institute cl Cancer Research, Londoo
`How long did it take to stop working?
`• Reply • Share >
`
`v
`
`A
`
`DavidB ~The Guv • 9 months ago
`Abiraterone worked for about a year before my PSA started to rise,
`which is better than the 8 months average in the trials.
`• Reply • Share >
`v
`
`A
`
`Alan Meyer~ The Guv • 9 months ago
`Guv,
`
`,.
`
`,.
`
`The article above says that clinical trials demonstrated an average
`response of eight months to the drug. Individual responses however
`can vary quite a bit. Some men get no benefrt at all while others may
`benefit for a year or several years. I have seen reports by several men
`that Zytiga seemed to stop working for them Their PSA went up but
`they kept taking the drug and, to their surprise, the PSA went down
`again. Different patients can have quite different tumor characteristics
`and drugs have different effects on them.
`
`As I understand it, Zytiga interferes with a chemical reaction that is
`involved in testosterone synthesis in all of the known pathways in all of
`the different cells that can synthesize testosterone. It is therefore more
`effective than the older LHRH agonists like Lupron, Zoladex, Eligard,
`etc. However, some scientists hypothesize that prostate tumor cells
`can and, given a long enough time, will, mutate to resume cell division
`and metastasis even in the absence of all testosterone.
`
`Hopefully, we will continue to develop anti-cancer drugs that work in
`ways other than testosterone suppression, thus extending life for men
`who have become "castration resistant".
`
`Best of luck to you.
`• Reply • Share >
`v
`
`A
`
`The Guv ~Alan Meyer • 9 months ago
`Thanks for the info. I am 2 months into Abiraterone treatment for
`mCRPC and was just curious how long it can be effective before one
`has to switch to other treatments. As you say it seems to depend on
`the person. The experience of others in the same boat would be
`welcome
`• Reply • Share >
`v
`
`A
`
`,.
`
`We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use this website,
`you are agreeing to our use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie policv. You can change your
`cookie settinas at anytime but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
`
`X
`
`ht!p:llwww.icr .ac.IJ</nB'Ns-featuresllatast-features/abi raterone-a-stay-ct-scienlific-i nrJOVali!ll-and-com mercial-partnership
`
`719
`
`

`

`M,._.at~~~ycl.-.,.,,~~-ooaai•.W•swll ... n...._fiC...P 4,....,
`•
`•
`dclwn 1lle In&. By th& wt1t 1lle . . . <llln't stop~. h eatlCei' Just
`gat snwrted Goad Ulc*.
`• ~ • Shere.
`v
`
`A
`
`Naxl D
`
`Related features articles
`
`Moving away from the 'one fraction alze fits all' approach to
`nsdiotherapy
`
`w.- c: :Ill et>..,...relhltw.~!Ye)'OU~I>Mtelq>Me-onoii'Melii>.By~ulntll>-tlle•ublb,
`)'Qll..,.....,,.. to our~A~~~e.ofaoaHMon )'Dllr...- • de
`l:sr:f l'\<:U' ~a DQif'N. You Q!n Wng• )'Dllr
`
`---<llfllf'/-butpo111 otoo.rllta wll noltllalon ooi!'ICIIIY - I t om.
`
`X
`
`ltp:f
`
`.tr.••''
`
`'wb
`
`' w •••o '*• at_. Glool:u
`
`• vlf "*
`
`c ••¥lip
`
`

`

`10012016
`
`AblraarClfl8: a sb-y ar sdanllllc lrnMIIIon and commS'Cial partnership· Tha lnslltutB r:l Canca' Raselrch, l..ondcn
`
`-------------->~----------------------------------------------------
`Re-inventing the finger
`
`In the first of five articles short-listed for the ICR's Mel Greaves Science Writing Prize 2015, the winner Dr
`Hugh Harvey writes about re-inventing an age-old test for prostate cancer.
`
`Find out more >
`
`Using the seeds of cancer to guide treatment strategies
`
`Circulating tumour cells can act as 'seeds' - breaking away from the primary tumour and colonising other
`sites in the body. But they are also becoming an increasingly useful tool in cancer medicine - measuring
`a patient's state of disease.
`
`Find out more >
`
`-f W
`-
`
`in
`
`Contacts
`Terms and conditions
`Privacy
`Cookies
`Accessibility
`Staff access
`Site map
`
`In partnership w ith
`The f\OYAL MAf\SDEN
`NHS foundation Trust
`
`We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By conUnulng to use this website,
`you are agreeing to our use of cookies on your device as desa1bed In our cookie policy. You can change your
`cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.
`
`X
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket