throbber
JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`Published online 7 May 2002 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jms.316
`
`Identification of phenylbutyrylglutamine, a new
`metabolite of phenylbutyrate metabolism in humans
`
`Blandine Comte,1 Takhar Kasumov,1 Bradley A. Pierce,1 Michelle A. Puchowicz,1
`Mary-Ellen Scott,1 Williams Dahms,2 Douglas Kerr,2 Itzhak Nissim3 and
`Henri Brunengraber1∗
`
`1 Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
`2 Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
`3 Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
`
`Received 26 December 2001; Accepted 1 March 2002
`
`Phenylbutyrate is used in humans for treating inborn errors of ureagenesis, certain forms of cancer, cystic
`fibrosis and thalassemia. The known metabolism of phenylbutyrate leads to phenylacetylglutamine,
`which is excreted in urine. We have identified phenylbutyrylglutamine as a new metabolite of
`phenylbutyrate in human plasma and urine. We describe the synthesis of phenylbutyrylglutamine
`and its assay by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry as a tert-butyldimethylsilyl or methyl derivative,
`using standards of [2H5]phenylbutyrylglutamine and phenylpropionylglutamine. After administration of
`phenylbutyrate to normal humans, the cumulative urinary excretion of phenylacetate, phenylbutyrate,
`phenylacetylglutamine and phenylbutyrylglutamine amounts to about half of the dose of phenylbutyrate.
`Thus, additional metabolites of phenylbutyrate are yet to be identified. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley &
`Sons, Ltd.
`
`KEYWORDS: phenylacetate; phenylbutyrate; phenylacetylglutamine; phenylbutyrylglutamine; liver conjugation
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Phenylbutyrate (PB) has been used as a pro-drug of
`phenylacetate (PA) in the treatment of hyperammonemia
`related to inborn errors of urea synthesis1 and as a drug
`in the treatment of a number of malignancies,2 – 4 cystic
`fibrosis5 and sickle cell anemia.6 The main fate of PA in
`primates and humans is its conjugation as phenylacetyl-CoA
`with glutamine in the liver to form phenylacetylglutamine
`(PAGN), which is excreted in urine.7 – 9 The labeling pattern
`of PAGN has been used for the non-invasive probing of the
`labeling pattern of citric acid cycle intermediates in human
`and primate liver.10 – 14 Compared with PA, PB has a more
`acceptable taste and smell and is less toxic.2 However, after
`administration of PB, the combined urinary excretion of PB,
`PA and PAGN is less than half of the ingested amount
`of PB.15 We hypothesized that by analogy with PA, PB
`is activated in the liver to phenylbutyryl-CoA (PB-CoA),
`

`Correspondence to: Henri Brunengraber, Department of
`Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
`44106-7139, USA. E-mail: hxb8@po.cwru.edu
`Contract/grant sponsor: NIH.
`Contract/grant sponsor: Cleveland Mt Sinai Health Care
`Foundation.
`Abbreviations: EI, electron ionization; GC/MS, gas
`chromatography/mass spectrometry; PA, phenylacetate; PAGN,
`phenylacetylglutamine; PAG, phenylacetylglutamate; PB,
`4-phenylbutyrate; PBGN, 4-phenylbutyrylglutamine; PBG,
`4-phenylbutyrylglutamate; PCI, positive chemical ionization; PP,
`3-phenylpropionate; PPG, 3-phenylpropionylglutamate; PPGN,
`3-phenylpropionylglutamine; TBDMS, tert-butyldimethylsilyl.
`
`581
`
`which could either undergo ˇ-oxidation to PA-CoA (the
`precursor of PAGN), or be conjugated with glutamine to
`form a new compound, phenybutyrylglutamine (PBGN).
`The latter would be excreted in urine with PAGN.
`We synthesized unlabeled and 2H-labeled PBGN, and
`present sensitive methods for its determination in biological
`fluids by GC/MS. Further, we assayed PB and its metabolites
`in plasma and urine from seven humans after an oral bolus
`of Na-PB. We demonstrated the formation and urinary
`excretion of PBGN.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`Materials
`Chemicals and solvents were obtained from Sigma-
`Aldrich Chemicals (Milwaukee, WI, USA). [2H7]Phenylacetic
`acid (99%) and [2H6]benzene were purchased from Isotec
`(Miamisburg, OH, USA). The derivatization agents N-
`methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MtB-
`STFA) and Methyl-8 (dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal)
`were supplied by Regis Chemical (Morton Grove, IL, USA)
`and Pierce (Rockford, IL, USA), respectively. All aqueous
`solutions were made with water purified with a Milli-Q
`system (Millipore).
`
`Preparation of unlabeled and deuterated standards
`(Table 1)
`PAGN and [2H7]PAGN were synthesized16 by reacting
`unlabeled or [2H7]phenylacetyl chloride with glutamine, as
`
`P LUPIN
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`EX. 1025
`
`

`
`(1C,Cg3)
`(2C,Cb2,Cb4),31.54(1C,Cg4),27.11(1C,Cb3),26.98
`141.57(1C,Cipso(cid:2)ar),51.72(1C,Cg2),34.80,34.75
`174.5,173.65,178.46(3C,3C(O),Cg1,Cg5,Cb1),
`
`CH2b4),2.30(m,4H,2CH2),1.92(m,4H,2CH2)
`7.50(d,1H,NH),6.30(bs,2H,NH2),2.65(m,2H,
`
`127–128
`
`OH
`
`CHC
`
`HN
`
`O
`
`O
`
`H2
`
`C N
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`O
`
`D
`
`D
`
`D
`
`D
`
`D
`
`582
`
`B. Comte et al.
`
`27.02(1C,Cg3)
`34.99(2C,Cb2,Cb4),31.72(1C,Cg4),27.46(1C,Cb3),
`Cmeta(cid:2)ar),125.66(1C,Cpara(cid:2)ar),51.78(1C,Cg2),35.24,
`141.57(1C,Cipso(cid:2)ar),128.33,128.15(4C,2Cortho(cid:2)ar,
`175.26,173.73,173.00(3C,3C(O),Cg1,Cg5,Cb1)
`
`(m,4H,CH2b2,CH2g4),1.90(m,4H,CH2b3,CH2g3)
`NH2),4.4(m,1H,CHg2),2.62(m,2H,CH2b4),2.28
`7.48(d,1H,NH),7.23(m,5H,Ph),6.28(s,2H,
`
`13CNMR(50MHz,υppm,CDCl3)b
`
`1HNMR(200MHz,υppm,CDCl3)a
`
` (PBGN)
`
`4-Phenylbutyrylglutamine
`
`NH2
`
`O
`
`C
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`O
`
`126–127
`
`M.p.(°C)
`
`OH
`
`CHC
`
`HN
`
`O
`
`Compound
`
`1
`
`Row
`
`Table1.Characteristicsofsynthesizedcompounds
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`
`Ccycle),20.84(1C,Cb3)
`Cb2),35.12(1C,Ccycle),31.97(1C,Ccycle),25.70(1C,
`125.96(1C,Cpara(cid:2)ar),57.70(1C,Ccycle),36.07(1C,
`Cipso(cid:2)ar),128.55,128.37(4C,2Cortho(cid:2)ar,2Cmeta(cid:2)ar),
`176.19,174.19,174.15(3C,3C(O),),141.88(1C,
`
`1.96(m,2H,CH2b3)
`CH2cycle),2.7–2.18(m,6H,CH2cycle,CH2b2,CH2b4),
`7.25(m,5H,Ph),4.76(m,1H,CHcycle),2.98(m,2H,
`
`57–58
`
`21.24(1C,Cb3)
`36.08(2C,Cb2,Cb4),35.1(1C,Cg4),25.71(1C,Cg3),
`2Cmeta(cid:2)ar),125.80(1C,Cpara(cid:2)ar),51.74(1C,Cg2),
`141.60(1C,Cipso(cid:2)ar),128.50,128.30(4C,2Cortho(cid:2)ar,
`175.03,173.70,172.92(3C,3C(O),Cg1,Cg5,Cb1),
`
`2.38–1.90(m,8H,2CH2b,2CH2g)
`NH),4.58(m,1H,CHg2),2.61(m,2H,CH2b4),
`8.5(bs,2H,2COOH),7.22(m,5H,Ph),6.92(d,1H,
`
`acid
`
`N-(4-Phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic
`
`O
`
`O
`
`COH
`
`O
`
`N
`
`(PBG)
`
`4-Phenylbutyrylglutamate
`
`O
`
`H
`C O
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`O
`
`OH
`
`CHC
`
`HN
`
`69–70
`
`O
`
`4-[2H5]Phenylbutyrylglutamine
`
`([2H5]PBGN)
`
`

`
`Identification of phenylbutyrylglutamine
`
`583
`
`b13CNMRspectrumofPPGNwasmonitoredinDMSO-d6.
`moietiesoftheappropriatecompound.
`aChemicalshiftsareassignedtocarbonsoftheglutamineandglutamate(g1–g5),pyroglutamate(cycle),butyryl(b1–b4),propionyl(p1–p3)orphenyl(ortho-ar,meta-ar,para-arandipso-ar)
`
`26.98(1C,Cg3)
`Cg2),36.76(C,Cp3),31.39(1C,Cg4),31.06(1C,Cp2),
`2Cortho(cid:2)ar,Cmeta(cid:2)ar),125.90(1C,Cpara(cid:2)ar),51.59(1C,
`141.35(1C,Cipso(cid:2)ar),128.32,128.23(4C,
`173.59,173.45,171.55(3C,3C(O),Cg1,Cg5,Cp1),
`
`2H,CH2g3)
`(t,2H,CH2p2),1.92(m,2H,CH2g4),1.84–1.65(m,
`NH2),4.16(m,1H,CHg2),2.62(t,2H,CH2p3),2.26
`7.26(d,1H,NH),6.95(m,5H,Ph),6.68(bs,2H,
`
`Cb2),30.12(1C,Cg4),27.29(1C,Cb3),27.02(1C,Cb3)
`Cg2),51.86,51.55(2C,2C3),35.57,35.14(2C,Cb4,
`2Cortho(cid:2)ar,2Cmeta(cid:2)ar),126.00(1C,Cpara(cid:2)ar),52.53(1C,
`141.46(1C,Cipso(cid:2)ar),128.53,128.42(4C,
`173.34,172.83,172.49(3C,C(O),Cg1,Cg5,Cb1),
`
`2H,CH2b4),2.35–1.9(m,8H,2C2g3,2,2C2b3,2).
`HCg2),3.70(s,3H,CH3),3.60(s,3H,CH3),2.62(t,
`7.21(m,5H,Ph),6.32(d,1H,NH),4.60(m,1H,
`
`(PPGN)
`
`3-Phenylpropionylglutamine
`
`O
`
`H2
`
`C N
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`O
`
`OH
`
`CHC
`
`HN
`
`129–130
`
`O
`
`N-(4-phenylbutyryl)glutamate
`
`Dimethyl
`
`O
`
`Me
`
`C O
`
`CH2
`
`CH2
`
`O
`
`OMe
`
`CHC
`
`HN
`
`38–39
`
`O
`
` N-(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamate
`
`Methyl
`
`O
`
`O
`
`37.75,25.81,22.80,20.84(5C,3Cb,2Ccycle)
`Cpara(cid:2)ar),57.84(1C,Ccycle),52.36(1C,CH3),38.08,
`Cipso(cid:2)ar),128.36(4C,2Cortho(cid:2)ar,2Cmeta(cid:2)ar),125.95(1C,
`174.08,174.02,171.85(3C,3C(O)),141.07(1C,
`
`CH3),2.98–1.98(m,10H,2C2cycle,3C2b)
`7.23(m,5H,Ph),4.75(m,1H,CHcycle),3.78(s,3H,
`
`45–46
`
`COMe
`
`O
`
`N
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`
`

`
`584
`
`B. Comte et al.
`
`described previously. Other compounds, listed in Table 1,
`were prepared as follows. [2H5]PB was prepared by alu-
`minum chloride-catalyzed condensation of ((cid:3)-butyrolactone
`with a twofold excess of [2H6]benzene.17 The yield was
`94% based on 0.125 mol of ((cid:3)-butyrolactone. The mass iso-
`topomer distribution of [2H5]PB was 67% M5, 27% M4, and
`5.4% M3 (the mass isotopomer distribution of [2H6]benzene
`used for the synthesis was 88%M6, 11% M5, and 0.8%
`M4). PBGN, [2H5]PBGN and 3-phenylpropionylglutamine
`(PPGN) were synthesized by conjugation of glutamine with
`4-phenylbutyryl chloride, 4-[2H5]phenylbutyryl chloride and
`3-phenylpropionyl chloride, respectively. Unlabeled stan-
`dards of glutamate conjugates (formed during the analytical
`processing of the glutamine conjugates), i.e. phenylacetyl-
`glutamate (PAG), 3-phenylpropionylglutamate (PPG) and
`4-phenylbutyrylglutamate (PBG), were prepared by reacting
`the corresponding acid chlorides with glutamate. Note that
`other procedures have been described for the syntheses of
`PBGN, PBG, and PPG.18 – 20 Except for commercial pheny-
`lacetyl chloride, the unlabeled and labeled acid chlorides
`used in the above syntheses were prepared by reacting the
`acids with freshly distilled dichloromethyl methyl ether and
`distilled under vacuum. The yields of [2H5]phenylbutyryl
`chloride and [2H5]phenylbutyrylglutamine synthesis were
`98% and 45%, respectively.
`For the synthesis of N-(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic
`acid and its methyl ester, procedures described for the
`phenylacetyl analogs were adapted.21 Pyroglutamic acid
`was converted to its ditrimethylsilyl derivative, which
`was
`reacted with 4-phenylbutyryl
`chloride. Removal
`of
`the
`carboxyl
`trimethylsilyl group yielded N-(4-
`phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic acid. For the synthesis of
`the methyl ester of N-(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic acid,
`pyroglutamic acid was converted to its methyl ester, which
`was activated by NaH before reaction with 4-phenylbutyryl
`chloride.22 Dimethyl N-(4-phenylbutyryl)glutamate was
`prepared by reacting 4-phenylbutyryl
`chloride with
`commercial L-glutamate dimethyl ester hydrochloride.
`
`Sample preparation
`For the determination of the concentrations of the free
`acids (PA and PB)
`in blood, plasma samples (0.5 ml)
`were spiked with 0.17 μmol of [2H7]PA, [2H5]PB and 3-
`phenylpropionate (PP) before deproteinization with 25 μl
`of saturated sulfosalicylic acid. The slurries were saturated
`with NaCl, acidified with one drop of 6 M HCl and extracted
`three times with 5 ml of diethyl ether. For the assays in urine,
`0.2 ml samples were spiked with 0.68 μmol of [2H7]PA and
`0.16 μmol [2H5]PB, acidified to pH 3 with HCl, saturated with
`NaCl and extracted three times with 3 ml of diethyl ether. The
`combined extracts were dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated
`before reacting the residues with 70 μl of MtBSTFA or
`Methyl-8 at 60 °C for 20 min. PA and PB were analyzed
`as their TBDMS or methyl derivatives.
`For the assay of
`the glutamine conjugates (PAGN
`and PBGN) in plasma, samples (0.5 ml) were spiked with
`0.8 μmol of PPGN, alkalinized to pH 12 and incubated at
`75 °C for 4 h to convert the glutamine conjugates to the
`glutamate derivatives. After the addition of 25 μl of saturated
`
`sulfosalicylic acid and 50 μl of 6 M HCl, the slurries were
`saturated with NaCl and extracted three times with 5 ml of
`ethyl acetate. The extracts were pooled, dried with Na2SO4,
`evaporated and the residues were reacted with 70 μl of
`Methyl-8 and incubated at 60 °C for 20 min.
`For the assay of PAGN and PBGN in urine, we tested two
`different methods. In the first assay, samples (0.2 ml) were
`adjusted at pH 12 with 1 M NaOH, spiked with 0.5 μmol
`of [2H7]PAGN and 0.25 μmol of [2H5]PBGN and incubated
`at 75 °C for 4 h to convert PAGN and PBGN to their respective
`glutamate conjugates (PAG and PBG).12 Then, the samples
`were acidified with 50 μl of 6 M HCl, saturated with NaCl
`and extracted three times with 5 ml of ethyl acetate. As
`previously described,23 the extracts were dried with Na2SO4
`and reacted with 70 μl of MtBSTFA at 60 °C for 20 min and
`analyzed as their TBDMS derivatives. In the second assay,
`samples (0.2 ml) were spiked with 1 μmol of PPGN and
`treated as for the first assay, except that PAG and PBG were
`derivatized with Methyl-8.
`
`GC/MS methods
`All the metabolites were analyzed as their TBDMS or methyl
`derivatives on a Hewlett-Packard Model 5890 gas chro-
`matograph equipped with an HP-5 capillary column (30 mð
`0.2 mm i.d., 0.5 mm film thickness; Hewlett-Packard) and
`coupled to a Model 5989A mass-selective detector. Sam-
`ples (0.2–1 μl) were injected with a splitting ratio of 20–50 : 1.
`(cid:2)1) and the column
`The carrier gas was helium (1 ml min
`head pressure was 32 kPa. The injector port temperature
`was at 250 °C, transfer line at 305 °C, source temperature
`at 230 °C and quadrupole at 150 °C. For the analysis of
`the TBDMS derivatives, the column temperature program
`(cid:2)1 to
`was initial temperature 150 °C, increased at 10 °C min
`(cid:2)1 to
`240 °C, held for 1 min at 240 °C, increased at 30 °C min
`305 °C and held for 18 min at 305 °C. After automatic cali-
`bration, the mass spectrometer was operated in the electron
`ionization (EI) mode (70 eV). Appropriate ion sets were
`monitored with a dwell time of 25–45 ms per ion, at
`m/z 193/200 (PA/[2H7]PA), 221/226 (PB/[2H5]PB), 304/311
`(PAG/[2H7]PAG cyclic form), 436/443 (PAG/[2H7]PAG lin-
`ear form), 332/337 (PBG/[2H5]PBG cyclic form) and 464/469
`(PBG/[2H5]PBG linear form).
`For the analysis of the methylated derivatives, the column
`program was slightly modified to initial temperature 90 °C
`(cid:2)1 to 190 °C, then at
`held for 1 min, increased at 15 °C min
`(cid:2)1 to 225 °C, then at 25 °C min
`(cid:2)1 to 305 °C and held
`5 °C min
`for 6 min at 305 °C. The injector port was at 280 °C, transfer
`line at 305 °C, source temperature at 200 °C and quadrupole at
`100 °C. The mass spectrometer was operated in the positive
`chemical ionization mode (CI, ammonia, 133 eV) with the
`appropriate selected ions at m/z 168/175 (PA/[2H7]PA), 182
`(PP), 196/201 (PB/[2H5]PB), 279/311 (PAG cyclic and linear
`form, respectively), 293/325 (PPG cyclic and linear) and
`307/339 (PBG cyclic and linear forms). All samples were
`injected two or three times.
`
`Clinical investigation
`The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional
`Review Board of Case Western Reserve University and Uni-
`versity Hospitals of Cleveland. All subjects were free from
`
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`
`

`
`Identification of phenylbutyrylglutamine
`
`585
`
`any chronic or acute illness. Women had a negative preg-
`nancy test and were not breastfeeding. Seven subjects (three
`men, four women; age 31.7 š 5.0 years; height 171.3 š 3.4 cm;
`weight 79.5 š 5.9 kg) received detailed information on the
`purpose of the investigation and signed an informed consent
`form. After an overnight fast, the subjects were admitted
`to the Clinical Research Center at 7.30 a.m. They remained
`fasting until completion of the study. An intravenous line
`(cid:2)1)
`was installed in the forearm with a saline infusion (20 ml h
`and a short blood sampling catheter was inserted in a super-
`ficial vein of the contra-lateral hand. The hand was placed
`in a heating box at 60 °C for sampling of arterialized venous
`blood. At 8.00 a.m, after baseline blood and urine sam-
`(cid:2)1 (5 g per 75 kg)
`pling, each subject ingested 0.36 mmol kg
`of Na-PB. This dose corresponds to 15–25% of the dose com-
`monly used in the treatment of patients with inborn errors
`(cid:2)1 per day). Water intake was
`of urea synthesis (0.2–0.4 g kg
`adjusted to induce a diuresis of at least 100 ml in 30 min.
`Heparinized blood (10 ml) and urine samples were collected
`at 30 min intervals for the first 3 h and then every hour
`until 8 h. Plasma and urine samples were quickly frozen and
`stored at (cid:2)80 °C until analysis.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Synthesis and assay of PBGN
`To test our hypothesis that PBGN is formed in human
`subjects who have ingested PB, we synthesized unlabeled
`and [2H5]PBGN (see above). PBGN is a white, crystalline
`solid, with a melting-point of 126–127 °C (103–104 °C for
`PAGN). The structure of PBGN and [2H5]PBGN were
`confirmed by NMR spectroscopy (1H and 13C, Table 1, rows 1
`and 2).
`When planning our analytical strategy, we took into
`account that PBGN would probably have characteristics
`similar to those of the previously known PAGN. The lat-
`ter can be isolated from biological fluids either (i) as
`such by ion-exchange chromatography or (ii) more con-
`veniently by solvent acid extraction following mild alka-
`line hydrolysis to PAG. This is why we also synthesized
`PBG (Table 1, row 3). In addition, since methyl deriva-
`tization of PAG yields the methyl derivative of cyclic
`N-(phenylacetyl)pyroglutamic acid, and also the open-
`chain dimethyl N-(phenylacetyl)glutamate, we synthesized
`(Table 1, rows 4–6) N-(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic acid,
`methyl N-(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamate and dimethyl N-
`(4-phenylbutyryl)glutamate. Lastly, we synthesized PPGN
`(Table 1, row 7) to serve as an analytical standard in addition
`to [2H7]PAGN and [2H5]PBGN.
`When PBGN was reacted with MtBSTFA or Methyl-
`8, each reagent yielded one derivative which, by analogy
`with PAGN, was tentatively identified as the TBDMS and
`methyl derivative, respectively, of the cyclic compound N-
`(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic acid (Table 1, row 4; Table 2,
`row 1). The formation of the cyclic compound was confirmed
`by reacting PBG with the same reagents, leading to the
`formation of the same cyclic derivatives (Table 2, compare
`row 1 with the first line of row 3). However, reaction of
`PBG with MtBSTFA or Methyl-8 also yielded non-cyclic
`
`derivatives, i.e. a di-TBDMS, a tri-TBDMS and a dimethyl
`derivative (Table 2, row 3, lines 2 and 3). Similar cyclic and
`open derivatives were obtained starting from [2H5]PBGN
`and [2H5]PBG (the latter derived from mild hydrolysis of the
`former; see Table 2, rows 2 and 4).
`cyclic
`the
`To confirm further
`the
`identity of
`derivatives of PBGN and PBG, we reacted the N-(4-
`phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic acid that we had synthesized
`(Table 1, row 4) with MtBSTFA and with Methyl-8 and
`obtained the same cyclic derivative (Table 2, compare row 5
`with rows 1 and 3). In addition, we prepared the methyl ester
`of N-(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic acid (Table 1, row 5),
`which after injection without further processing into the
`GC/MS system yielded the same spectrum as PBGN, PBG
`and N-(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamic acid derivatized with
`Methyl-8 (Table 2, compare row 6 with rows 1, 3 and
`5). Lastly, to confirm the identity of the linear dimethyl
`derivative obtained by reacting PBG with Methyl-8, we
`prepared dimethyl N-(4-phenylbutyryl)glutamate (Table 1,
`row 6), which after injection without further processing into
`the GC/MS system yielded the same spectrum as PBG
`derivatized with Methyl-8 (Table 2, compare row 7 with
`line 2 of row 3 in the methyl derivative column).
`The combination of
`information obtained from the
`derivatives listed in Table 2, rows 1–11, confirms the identity
`of the ions used to assay the concentration of PBGN in
`biological fluids.
`Table 2 (rows 10 and 11) also presents the derivatives
`used to assay the concentration of phenylacetylglutamine
`using [2H7]PAGN as internal standard. Mild hydrolysis of
`the analyte and internal standard yielded the corresponding
`unlabeled and deuterated PAG.
`In addition to the use of deuterated internal standards,
`we used unlabeled PPGN to compute the concentrations of
`PAGN and PBGN. Mild hydrolysis of PPGN yielded PPG
`which, after reaction with MtBSTFA and with Methyl-8,
`yielded the derivatives listed in Table 2, row 13. Figure 1(A)
`shows the ion chromatogram of a mixture of cyclical
`methylated derivatives of PAG, PPG and PBG resulting
`from the hydrolysis of the corresponding standards of
`glutamine conjugates before derivatization with Methyl-8.
`Figure 1(B) and (C) show similar ion chromatograms of
`identical derivatives formed by treatment of the urine from a
`subject who had ingested phenylbutyrate. The urine sample
`was spiked with a standard of phenylpropionylglutamine.
`The calibration graphs were linear from 10 to 700 nmol for
`both derivatives (r2 D 0.99).
`PA and PB were assayed using deuterated analogs and
`PP as standards. The derivatives are listed in Table 2, rows
`14–18. The calibration graphs of PA and PB concentrations
`were linear in the range 0.4–500 nmol. Assays of methylated
`PA and PB in 84 samples of plasma yielded identical data
`when computed using the deuterated internal standards
`versus the PP standard. The correlation slopes were 1.06 and
`1.05 with r2 D 0.99 and 0.97 for PB and PA, respectively.
`
`Clinical investigation
`In seven normal adults, the baseline plasma concentrations
`of PA (0.09 š 0.07 (SE) mM) and PAGN (0.6 š 0.6 μM) were
`
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`
`

`
`586
`
`B. Comte et al.
`
`269/286
`
`262/279
`322/339
`290/307
`
`290/307
`
`327/344
`
`295/312
`
`322/339
`
`290/307
`
`295/312
`
`290/307
`
`m/z
`
`AmmoniaPCI
`
`268
`
`261
`321
`289
`
`289
`
`326
`
`294
`
`321
`
`289
`
`294
`
`289
`
`m/z
`
`12.9
`
`12.9
`18.7
`16.0
`
`16.0
`
`18.7
`
`16.0
`
`18.7
`
`16.0
`
`16.0
`
`16.0
`
`RT(min)
`
`EI
`
`Methylderivatives
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`LinearDimethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`LinearDimethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`311
`
`304
`
`332
`583
`469
`
`337
`578
`464
`
`332
`
`337
`
`332
`
`m/z
`
`12.1
`
`12.1
`
`13.8
`17.5
`17.0
`
`13.8
`17.5
`17.0
`
`13.8
`
`13.8
`
`13.8
`
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`Tri-TBDMS
`Di-TBDMS
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`Tri-TBDMS
`Di-TBDMS
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`
`[2H7]Phenylacetylglutamine
`
`Phenylacetylglutamine
`DimethylN-(4-phenylbutyryl)glutamate
`MethylN-(4-phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamicacid
`
`N-(4-Phenylbutyryl)pyroglutamicacid
`
`3-[2H5]Phenylbutyrylglutamate
`
`4-Phenylbutyrylglutamate
`
`4-[2H5]Phenylbutyrylglutamine
`
`Phenylbutyrylglutamine
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`RT(min)
`
`EI
`
`TBDMSderivatives
`
`Compound
`
`Row
`
`Table2.GC/MSanalysesa
`
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`
`

`
`Identification of phenylbutyrylglutamine
`
`587
`
`initaliccharactersinrows6and7aremethylesterswhichdonotrequirederivatization.
`toderivatizationofthetwocarboxylsandoftheamidenitrogenlinkingglutamatewitheitherthephenylacetyl,phenylpropionylorphenylbutyrylgroup.Thesynthesizedcompoundslisted
`showstheretentiontimes(RT)andtheionsmonitored(m/z).InthecaseofammoniaPCI,them/zvaluesreportedcorrespondtotheMC1andMC18ions.Thetri-TBDMSderivativesrefer
`aAlltheTBDMSandmethylderivativeswererunon30mHP-5columns(0.2mmi.d.,0.5μmfilmthickness).ThemassspectrometerwasoperatedinEIorammoniaPCImode.Thetable
`
`165/182
`158/175
`151/168
`184/201
`179/196
`
`308/325
`
`276/293
`
`276/293
`
`301/318
`
`269/286
`
`294/311
`
`262/279
`
`164
`157
`150
`183
`178
`
`307
`
`275
`
`275
`
`300
`
`268
`
`293
`
`261
`
`5.41
`4.45
`4.51
`6.33
`6.37
`
`17.0
`
`14.5
`
`14.5
`
`15.0
`
`12.9
`
`15.0
`
`12.9
`
`LinearDimethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`LinearDimethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`LinearDimethyl
`
`Cyclicmethyl
`
`207
`200
`193
`226
`221
`564
`450
`
`318
`
`318
`557
`443
`
`311
`550
`436
`
`304
`
`5.48
`4.25
`4.31
`6.45
`6.49
`16.8
`16.2
`
`13.1
`
`13.1
`16.0
`15.3
`
`12.1
`16.0
`15.3
`
`12.1
`
`Tri-TBDMS
`Di-TBDMS
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`Tri-TBDMS
`Di-TBDMS
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`Tri-TBDMS
`Di-TBDMS
`TBDMS
`Cyclic
`
`3-Phenylpropionate
`[2H7]Phenylacetate
`Phenylacetate
`4-[2H5]Phenylbutyrate
`4-Phenylbutyrate
`
`3-Phenylpropionylglutamate
`
`3-Phenylpropionylglutamine
`
`[2H7]Phenylacetylglutamate
`
`Phenylacetylglutamate
`
`18
`17
`16
`15
`14
`
`13
`
`12
`
`11
`
`10
`
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`
`

`
`Abundance × 104
`
`5.5
`5.0
`4.5
`4.0
`3.5
`3.0
`2.5
`2.0
`1.5
`1.0
`.5
`
`00
`
`A
`
`C
`
`PAG, m/z 279
`
`PBG, m/z 307
`
`PPG, m/z 293
`
`13.0
`
`13.5
`
`14.0
`
`14.5
`
`15.0
`
`15.5
`
`16.0
`
`16.5
`
`17.0
`
`17.5
`
`B
`
`012345678
`
`012345678
`
`Abundance × 106
`
`Abundance × 106
`
`588
`
`B. Comte et al.
`
`13.0
`
`13.5
`
`14.0
`
`14.5
`
`15.5
`15.0
`Time (min)
`
`16.0
`
`16.5
`
`17.0
`
`17.5
`
`Figure 1.
`(A) Ion chromatogram of a mixture of phenylacetylglutamate (PAG), phenylpropionylglutamate (PPG) and
`phenylbutyrylglutamate (PBG) resulting from the hydrolysis of the corresponding standards of glutamine conjugates before
`derivatization with Methyl-8. (B) and (C) similar ion chromatograms of derivatives formed by treatment of the urine from a subject
`who had ingested phenylbutyrate. The urine sample was spiked with a standard of phenylpropionylglutamine.
`
`PA
`PB
`PAGN
`PBGN
`
`100
`
`300
`200
`Time (min)
`
`400
`
`500
`
`1.8
`
`1.5
`
`1.2
`
`0.9
`
`mM
`
`0.6
`
`0.3
`
`0.0
`
`0
`
`Figure 2. Profile over 8 h of phenylacetate (PA), phenylbutyrate (PB), phenylacetylglutamine (PAGN) and phenylbutyrylglutamine
`(PBGN) concentrations in human plasma (mean š SE, n D 7) after an oral ingestion of 0.36 mmol kg(cid:2)1 of Na-PB.
`
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`
`

`
`Identification of phenylbutyrylglutamine
`
`589
`
`0
`
`30
`
`60
`
`240
`90 120 150 180
`Time (min)
`
`300
`
`360
`
`420
`
`480
`
`A
`
`B
`
`20
`10
`0
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`mmol PA
`
`mmol PB
`
`0
`-60
`
`Figure 3. Profile over 8 h of the urinary excretion of phenylacetate (PA) and phenylbutyrate (PB) in the same patients as in Fig. 2.
`
`0
`
`30 60 90 120 150 180
`240
`Time (min)
`
`300
`
`360
`
`420
`
`480
`
`A
`
`B
`
`2.5
`
`2
`
`1.5
`
`1
`
`0.5
`
`0
`
`2.5
`
`2
`
`1.5
`
`1
`
`0.5
`
`mmole PAGN
`
`mmole PBGN
`
`0
`-60
`
`Figure 4. Profile over 8 h of the urinary excretion of phenylacetylglutamine (PAGN) and phenylbutyrylglutamine (PBGN) in the same
`patients as in Fig. 2.
`
`similar to previously published data.23 PB and PBGN were
`not detected in basal plasma. Figure 2 shows the profiles
`of PA, PB, PAGN and PBGN concentrations in plasma
`after an oral bolus of Na-PB. The concentrations of PB and
`PBGN peaked at 50–90 min and those of PA and PAGN at
`150–180 min. The ratios of the areas under the curve were
`2.3 š 0.4 for PB/PA and 2.3 š 0.7 for PBGN/PAGN.
`Figure 3 shows the profiles of the urinary excretion of
`PB and PA. Eight hours following the ingestion of PB,
`the cumulative excretions of PB (278 š 61 μmol) and PA
`(79 š 12 μmol) amounted to 0.97 š 0.23 and 0.26 š 0.06% of
`the dose, respectively.
`Figure 4 shows the profile of urinary excretion of PBGN
`and PAGN. The cumulative excretions of PB metabolites over
`8 h are presented in Table 3. The excretions of PBGN and
`PAGN amounted to 21.5 and 32.6% of the dose, respectively.
`
`By then, excretion of PBGN was terminated, whereas
`excretion of PAGN was still ongoing, albeit at a low rate.
`The total recovery of the ingested dose of phenylbutyrate
`as identified urinary compounds (PACPBCPAGNCPBGN)
`was 53.4 š 4.5% after 8 h.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Methodological considerations
`Isotope dilution mass spectrometric assays are often made
`difficult by the non-availability and/or the high cost of
`internal standards labeled with stable isotopes (2H or 13C). An
`alternate strategy is to use a chemical analog of the analyte,
`preferably commercially available or easy to synthesize at a
`low cost. We were concerned that few laboratories would
`consider synthesizing [2H7]PAGN and [2H5]PBGN as part of
`
`Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
`
`J. Mass Spectrom. 2002; 37: 581–590
`
`

`
`590
`
`B. Comte et al.
`
`Table 3. Recovery of PB and its metabolites in
`human urine (n D 7) after the oral ingestion of
`0.36 mmol kg(cid:2)1 of Na-PB
`
`Metabolite
`
`PA
`PB
`PAGN
`PBGN
`Total
`
`Amount (mmol)
`0.079 š 0.012
`0.278 š 0.061
`9.63 š 0.74
`6.39 š 0.50
`16.33 š 1.32
`
`Percentage
`0.26 š 0.06
`0.97 š 0.23
`32.6 š 1.9
`21.5 š 2.4
`53.4 š 4.5
`
`a study of the metabolism of PB, which is why we conducted
`our assays using the deuterated species and the chemical
`analog PPGN as standards. Similarly, we assayed PA and
`PB with [2H7]PA and [2H5]PB and also with the analog PP.
`Since the two types of standardization procedures yielded
`identical concentrations, investigators can select either type
`of standardization of the assays.
`We also showed that the analytes studied can be assayed
`as either methyl or TBDMS derivatives. Although TBDMS
`derivatives are more stable than methyl esters, the latter
`are more sensitive. Hence a decision between derivatives
`should be made depending on the expected concentrations
`and instrument availability.
`
`Physiological considerations
`PA has been used for many years for the treatment of inborn
`errors of the urea cycle.1,24 – 26 Patients treated with PA excrete
`waste N as PAGN instead of urea. This conjugation occurs
`only in humans and primates. The conjugation of PA with
`glutamine represents by far the main fate of exogenous PA.
`Indeed, in rhesus monkeys infused intravenously with PA
`for 5 h, the cumulative excretion of PAGN amounted to
`about 95% of the dose of PA infused.12
`The formation of PAGN has been used in clinical
`investigations using radioactive and stable isotopic tracers
`to probe non-invasively the labeling pattern of citric acid
`cycle intermediates in the livers of normal and diabetic
`humans.11,13,14,27 When 14C- or 13C-labeled lactate or pyruvate
`are administered, the labeling pattern of urinary PAGN is
`identical to that of ˛-ketoglutarate in the liver12.
`In recent years, the foul-smelling PA was replaced by
`PB for the treatment of inborn errors of the urea cycle.25,26
`It was assumed that PB undergoes one cycle of ˇ-oxidation
`forming PA-CoA and PA, the former being the substrate
`that actually conjugates with glutamine. In addition, PB
`was used extensively as (i) a cytostatic which potentiate the
`effect of cytotoxic agents such as fluorouracil on malignant
`tumors, probably via inhibition of histone deacetylases,2,3
`and (ii) an experimental drug for the treatment of cystic
`fibrosis,5 peroxisomal biogenesis disorders28 and sickle-cell
`anemia.6
`Investigators at the US National Cancer Institute pointed
`out to us that, following ingestion of PB, the cumulative
`excretions of PB C PA C PAGN amounted to less that
`half of the ingested dose of PB (L. Grochow, personal
`
`communication, 1999). This is why we postulated the
`formation of PBGN, an analog of PAGN. The data from
`our clinical investigation clearly demonstrate that PBGN is
`formed and excreted by normal humans who have ingested
`PB. A substantial amount (21.5 š 2.4%) of the Na-PB load
`was converted to PBGN. However, the cumulative excretions
`of PA, PB, PAGN and PBGN still account for only about half
`of the amount of PB ingested. Therefore, part of the ingested
`PB is converted to metabolite(s) which have not yet been
`identified.
`
`Acknowledgements
`This work was supported by grants from the NIH and the Cleveland
`Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Brusilow SW. Pediatr. Res. 1991; 29: 147.
`2. Gore SD, Carducci MA. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2000; 9: 2923.
`3. Gilbert J, Baker SD, Bowling MK, Grochow L,
`Figg WD,
`Zabelina Y, Donehower RC, Carducci MA. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001;
`7: 2292–2300.
`4. Bar-Ner M, Thibault A, Tsokos M, Magrath IT, Samid D. Clin.
`Cancer Res. 1999; 5: 1509.
`5. Rubenstein RC, Zeitlin PL. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2000; 278:
`C259.
`6. Dover GJ, Brusilow S, Charache S. Blood 1994; 84: 339.
`7. Ambrose AM, Sherwin CP. J. Biol. Chem. 1933; 101: 669.
`8. Moldave K, Meister A. J. Biol. Chem. 1957; 229: 463.
`9. Webster LL Jr, Lucas SV, Strong JM, Mieyal JJ. J. Biol. Chem. 1976;
`251: 3352.
`Ekberg K,
`Schumann WC,
`10. Landau BR, Chandramouli V,
`Kumaran K, Kalhan SC, Wahren J. Diabetologia 1995; 38: 831–838.
`11. Magnusson I, Schumann WC, Bartsch GE, Chandramouli V,
`Kumaran K, Wahren J, Landau BR. J. Biol. Chem. 1991; 266:
`6975–6984.
`12. Yang D, Previs SF, Fernandez CA, Dugelay S, Soloviev MV,
`Hazey JW, Agarwal KC, Levine WC, David F, Rinaldo P,
`Beylot M, Brunengraber H. Am. J. Physiol. 1996; 270: E882–E889.
`13. Cline GW, Rothman DL, Magnusson I, Katz LD, Shulman GI. J.
`Clin. Invest. 1994; 94: 2369.
`14. Jones JG, Solomon MA, Cole SM, Sherry AD, Malloy CR. Am. J.
`Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001; 281: E848.
`15. Piscitelli SC, Thibault A, Figg WD, Tompkins A, Headlee D,
`Lieberman R, Samid D, Myers CE. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1995; 35:
`368–373.
`16. Williams CM, Porter AH, Greer M, Scott KN, Sweeley CC.
`Biochem. Med. 1969; 3: 164.
`17. Truce WE, Olson CE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952; 74: 4721.
`18. Garyaev AP, Kononov OV, Dumpis MA, Piotrovskii LB. Khim.
`Farm. Zh. 1990; 24: 20.
`19. Gunther R, Bordusa F. Chem. Eur. J. 2000; 6: 463.
`20. Goldman VS, Laney JW, Slife CW. US Patent 5, 932, 198, 1999.
`21. Rigo B, Lespagnol C, Pauly M. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1988; 25: 49.
`22. Rigo B, Lespagnol C, Pauly M. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1988; 25: 63.
`23. Yang D, Beylot M, Agarwal KC, Soloviev MV, Brunengraber H.
`Anal. Biochem. 1993; 212: 277.
`24. Batshaw ML, Thomas GH, Brusilow SW. Pediatrics 1981; 68: 290.
`25. Berry GT, Steiner RD. J. Pediatr. 2001; 138: S56.
`26. Burlina AB, Ogier H, Korall H, Trefz FK. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2001;
`72: 351.
`27. Diraison F, Large V, Bru

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket