throbber
(12) United States Patent
`Itoh et al.
`
`(10) Patent N0.:
`
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 6,221,402 B1
`Apr. 24, 2001
`
`US006221402B1
`
`RAPIDLY RELEASING AND TASTE-
`MASKING PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE
`FORM
`
`Inventors: Akinori Itoh, Taketoyo-cho; Toshiyuki
`Niwa, Handa, both of (JP)
`
`Assignee: Pfizer Inc., New York, NY (US)
`
`Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`Appl. No.:
`PCT Filed:
`
`09/341,312
`
`Nov. 20, 1997
`
`PCT N0.:
`
`PCT/IB97/01471
`
`§ 371 Date:
`
`Sep. 20, 1999
`
`§ 102(e) Date: Sep. 20, 1999
`PCT Pub. N0.: W098/30209
`
`PCT Pub. Date:Jul. 16, 1998
`
`Int. Cl.7 ..................................................... .. A61K 9/14
`U.S. Cl.
`........................ .. 424/494; 424/490; 424/493;
`424/495; 424/497; 514/781; 514/951
`Field of Search ................................... .. 424/489, 464,
`424/465, 451, 452, 455, 458, 459, 461,
`462, 493, 494, 497, 490, 495
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`0409254
`0458751
`63—258809
`6—56700
`2576927
`9601623
`
`(EP)
`
`1/1991
`.............................. .. A61K/9/14
`11/1991
`A61K,/31/195
`10/1988
`..... .. A61K/9/50
`A61K/47/38
`3/1994
`A61K/47/38
`1/1997
`6/1995 (wo) ............................ .. A61K/9/26
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Merck Index, 11th Merck & Co. NJ, 1989, pp. 935.
`Remington farmacia Practica, Second Spanish Ed. pp. 510,
`511, 512 Editorial Utheha 1985.
`Database WPI; Section Ch, Week 9413, Derwent Publica-
`tions, Ltd., London, GB; Class A96, AN 94—106744;
`XP002059781.
`Databasc WPI; Scction Ch, Week 8849, Dcrwcnt Publica-
`tions Ltd., London, GB; Class A96, AN 88—348774,
`XP002059782.
`
`Primary Examiner—James M. Spear
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Peter C. Richardson; Gregg
`C. Benson; Michelle A. Sherwood
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A rapidly-releasing and taste-masking pharmaceutical dos-
`age form and a process for preparing such oral dosage form
`are disclosed.
`
`9 Claims, N0 Drawings
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`RBP_TEVA05022334
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`

`
`US 6,221,402 B1
`
`1
`RAPIDLY RELEASING AND TASTE-
`MASKING PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE
`FORM
`
`This is a National Stage filing under 35 USC §371 based
`on PCT/IB97/01471 which was filed internationally on Nov.
`20, 1997.
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`
`This invention relates to rapidly releasing and taste-
`masking pharmaceutical dosage form, and a process for
`preparation thereof. More specifically, this invention relates
`to a pharmaceutical dosage form which can be orally admin-
`istered without bitter taste, with improved drug release
`properties in a gastrointestinal tract.
`BACKGROUND ART
`
`The bitter taste of many drugs which are orally adminis-
`tered are disadvantageous in several aspects. For example,
`the disagreeable taste of drugs causes difficulties in swal-
`lowing or causes patients to avoid taking their medication,
`whereby resulting in low compliance of patients. Thus,
`taste—masking technologies are considered very important,
`and are being developed by many researchers. The taste-
`masking is usually achieved by forming a taste—masking
`layer on a particle having an active ingredient. However, the
`taste—masking layer may cause poor drug release profiles.
`Thus,
`the formulation design is difficult to provide oral
`dosage forms having good taste—masking properties and
`good drug release properties.
`European Patent Application No. EP 0409254 discloses
`rapid -releasing oral particle pharmaceutical preparation with
`unpleasant taste masked. The oral particle pharmaceutical
`preparation comprises a core and a film layer coating the
`core, the core at least containing a drug having an unpleasant
`taste and a water-swelling agent, and the film layer at least
`containing ethylcellulose and a water-soluble substance.
`However, this technology usually requires the heating of
`final product (e.g., at 60—75° C., 10-20 hr) to attain good
`drug release properties. The heating treatment is not pref-
`erable for heat-sensitive drugs which may be decomposed or
`melt at such high temperature. Further, in this technology,
`the effective masking time is described as more than 20
`seconds. Such time period is not enough to provide complete
`masking effect for some patinets such as those with artificial
`teeth. Also, the previous technology cannot avoid the use of
`acetone and chlorine solvent (e.g., methyene chloride),
`which is harmful to human bodies, to provide the sufficient
`masking effect.
`Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No.
`S63-258809 discloses fine granules prepared by forming 1 to
`10 wt. % of an outer layer on a core particle having a bitter
`active ingredient, and forming 3 to 10 wt. % of a saliva-
`i11soluble layer on the outer layer. However, this technology
`cannot provide fine granules having rapid release properties
`in neutral and alkalic pH media. This is because the polymer
`composed of the outer layer has solubility strongly depen-
`dent on pH in media, and cannot be dissolved and disrupted
`in the neutral and alkalic pH media.
`Accordingly,
`it would be desired if oral dosage form
`having improved drug release properties and taste—masking
`properties were provided.
`BRIEF DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention provides a rapidly releasing and
`taste—masking pharmaceutical dosage form (or pharmaceu-
`
`2
`tical preparation) comprising a core containing a pharma-
`ceutically active ingredient, low-substituted hydroxypropyl
`cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose, the amount of the
`microcrystalline cellulose being at least 26.0 weight percent
`based on the total weight of the core; an inner coating layer
`formed on the core and containing a water-soluble polymer;
`and an outer coating layer formed on the inner coating layer
`and containing a saliva-insoluble polymer. In the dosage
`form of this invention, the core, the inner coating layer and
`the outer coating layer are preferably contained in an amount
`of from 49.9 to 95.1, from 0.1 to 45.3 and from 4.8 to 50.0
`weight percent, respectively, based on the total weight of the
`dosage form. Thc dosage form may further comprises a
`sugar coating layer formed on the outer coating layer. The
`core is preferably in a spherical form and has an average
`particle diameter of 80 to 400 micrometers, more preferably
`100 to 300 micrometers.
`
`Suitable inner coating layer comprises 70.0 to 100 weight
`percent of a water-soluble polymer such as hydroxypropy-
`lmethyl cellulose, and up to 30.0 weight percent of a
`water-insoluble polymer such as (1) an ethyl acrylate/methyl
`methacrylate copolymer,
`(2) an ethyl acrylate/methyl
`methacrylate/trimethylammonioethyl methacrylate copoly-
`mer. Suitable outer coating layer comprises 70.0 to 100
`weight percent of a saliva-insoluble polymer such as (3) a
`buthyl methacrylate/(2—dimethylaminoethyl)
`methacrylatelmethyl methacrylate copolymer, and up to
`30.0 wcight pcrccnt of a water-soluble or watcr-insoluble
`copolymer.
`According to the present invention, oral dosage forms
`having improved drug release properties and taste—masking
`properties (for example, more than 50 seconds) can be
`provided.
`The present invention also provides a process for prepar-
`ing the dosage form as mentioned above, which comprises
`mixing core materials containing a pharmaceutically active
`ingredient,
`low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose and
`microcrystalline cellulose and subject the mixed core mate-
`rials to wet agitation granulation, dry treatment and sieving
`treatment in this order to obtain core particles; forming an
`inner coating layer on the core particles by spraying with an
`aqueous solution containing a water-soluble polymer; and
`then forming an outer coating layer on the inner coating
`layer by spraying with an aqueous solution containing a
`saliva-insoluble polymer. This process can be carried out in
`the absence of a solvent harmful to a human body (e.g.,
`acetone and chlorine solvent such as methylene chloride,
`chloroform and methyl chloride). Thus,
`this process is
`advantageous in view of safety and ecology.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`In the present invention, the oral dosage form comprises
`at least three layers, i.e., a core (also referred to as core
`particle) containing a pharmaceutically active ingredient,
`low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose and microcrystal-
`line cellulose; an inner coating layer containing a water-
`soluble polymer; and an outer coating layer containing a
`saliva-insoluble polymer.
`Active ingredients which usually used in this invention
`have a bitter taste, although those having no bitter taste can
`also be used. Active ingredients useful in this invention
`include, for example, antifungal agents such as fluconazole,
`_ pain relievers such as acetaminophen and acetylsalicylic
`acid, antihistamines such as diphenhydramine, doxylamine
`succinate and meclizine, decongestants such as pse11doephe-
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`RBP_TEVA05022335
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`

`
`US 6,221,402 B1
`
`3
`drine hydrochloride, anti—impotence such as sildenafil, anti-
`biotics such as azithromycin, erythromycin and
`cepholosporin, penicillins such as sultamicillin tosylate and
`amoxicillin trihydrate, enzyme inhibitors such as sulbactam
`sodium, anthihypertensives such as nifedipine, doxazosin
`mesylate and arnlodipine besylate, antidiabetics such as
`glipizide, bronchodilators such as pirbuterol hydrochloride
`and theophyfline, anti—inflammatory agents such as piroxi—
`cam and tenidap, anti-depressants such as sertaraline
`hydrochloride, antacids such as calcium carbonate and mag-
`nesium oxide, and non-sedative antihistamines such as
`cetirizine, cardiotonics such as digitoxin and digoxin.
`As used herein, “microcrystalline cellulose” means
`purified, partially depolymerized cellulose prepared by treat-
`ing alpha cellulose. Examples of the microcrystalline cellu-
`lose are those soled under the tradename of AvicelTM
`(manufactured by Asahi Chemical Industry), Ccolusw
`(manufactured by Asahi Chemical Industry), VivacelTM
`(manufactured by J. Rettenmaier & Sohne GmbH), and
`EmcocelTM(manufactured by Edward Mendell Co. Inc.).
`Suitable microcrystalline celluloses include those sold under
`the trade name of AvicelTM PH-101, PH- 102, PH-301 and
`PH-302 (manufactured by Asahi Chemical Industry), and
`mixtures of two or more of these celluloses. Most preferred
`are Avice'“"‘ PH-101.
`
`As used herein, “low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellu-
`lose” me ans a low-substituted poly (hydroxypropyl) ether of
`cellulose, which contains not less than 5.0% and not more
`than 16.0 % of hydroxypropoxy groups on a dried basis.
`Examples of
`low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose
`include one sold under
`the trade name of LH-31
`
`(manufactured by Shin-Etsu Co. Ltd.)
`If desired,
`the other additives may be added to the
`above—mentioned core materials. Such additives include a
`
`binder such as hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, or hydrox-
`ypropyl cellulose, a masking agent such as calcium
`gluconate, magnesium oxide and a lubricant such as talc and
`magnesium stearate.
`The core particles used in this invention are preferably in
`a spherical form, and has an average particle diameter of 80
`to 400 micrometers, more preferably 100 to 300 microme-
`tcrs. Preferably, the cores may have a sphcricity of 0.85 to
`1.0, more preferably 0.9 to 1.0. The spherical core particles
`used in this invention are advantageous in that coating
`efficiency can be improved in subsequent coatings of an
`inner layer and an outer layer.
`Suitable cores (also referred to as core particles) used in
`the present invention comprises 0.1 to 73.5, more preferably
`20.0 to 40.0 of the active ingredient; 26.0 to 99.4, more
`preferably 28.0 to 80.0, most preferably 30.0 to 60.0 weight
`percent of the microcrystalline cellulose; and 0.5 to 34.0,
`more preferably 3.0 to 30.0 weight percent of the low-
`substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose,
`the weight percent
`being based on the total weight of the core material. Use of
`core particles with these component ratios may give good
`drug release profiles. When the amount of the microcrys-
`talline cellulose is outside of the above—mentioned level, the
`sphericity of the resultant core particles may be decreased,
`resulting in decrease in coating efficiency.
`In the present invention, an inner coating layer is formed
`on the above—mentioned core particles. The purpose of
`formation of the inner coating layer is smoothing of core
`surface and easy separation of the outer coating layer from
`an acidic solution of an active ingredient such as sildenafil
`citrate (about pH3.85). Suitable inner coating layer com-
`prises 70.0 to 100 weight percent of a water-soluble
`polymer, and up to 30.0 weight percent of a water-insoluble
`polymer.
`
`4
`As used herein, the term “water-soluble polymer” means
`a conventional polymer for pharmaceutical use, having a
`solubility of more than 10 mg/ml in water. Suitable water-
`soluble polymers include, for example, hydroxypropylm-
`ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, polyvinyl pyroli—
`dore and polyvinyl alcohol. Most preferred water-soluble
`polymers used in this invention are hydroxypropylmethyl
`cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose. As used herein, the
`term “Water-insoluble polymer” means a conventional poly-
`mer for pharmaceutical use, having a solubility of not more
`than 10 mg/ml in water. Suitable watcr-insolublc polymers
`include, for example, ethylcellulose, methacrylate copoly-
`mcrs and aminoalkyl mcthacrylatc copolymcrs such as an
`ethyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate copolymer and an ethyl
`acrylate/methyl methacrylate/trimethylammonioethyl meth-
`acrylate copolymer. Commercially available water-insoluble
`polymers may be used. Such water-insoluble polymers are
`those sold under the trade name of Aquacoat (manufactured
`by Asahi Chemical Industry) Eudragit NE and Eudragit RS
`(manufactured by Rohm Pharma).
`If desired, the other additives may be added to the inner
`coating materials. Such additives include, for example, a
`lubricant such as magnesium stearate or talc.
`Then, an outer coating layer is formed on the above-
`mentioned inner layer. The outer coating layer mainly has a
`taste-masking effect to prevent an active ingredient from
`being released when a patient hold a coated drug in his
`mouth. Suitable outer coating layer comprises 70.0 to 100
`weight percent of a saliva—insoluble polymer and up to 30.0
`weight percent of a water-soluble or water-insoluble
`polymer, the weight percent being based on the total weight
`of the outer coating layer. As used herein, the term “saliva-
`soluble polymer” means a conventional synthetic polymer
`for pharmaceutical use, having a solubility of less than 10
`mg/ml in neutral pH (6.0—7.5) and more than 10 mg/ml in
`acidic pH (1.2—5.0). Suitable saliva—insoluble polymers
`include, for example, aminoalkyl methacrylate copolymers
`such as a buthyl methacrylate/(2-dimethylaminoethyl)
`methacrylate/methyl methacrylate copolymer and polyviny-
`lacetal diethylaminoacetate. Commercially available poly-
`mers may be used. Such polymers are those sold under the
`trade name of Eudragit E (manufactured by Rohm Pharma)
`and the trade name of AEA (Sankyo) (manufactured by
`Sankyo). Suitable water-soluble polymers used as outer
`coating materials include, for example, hydroxypropylm-
`ethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose. Suitable water-
`insoluble polymers used as inner coating materials include,
`for example, ethylcellulose and Eudragit RS.
`In the oral dosage forms of the present invention, the core,
`the inner coating layer and the outer coating layer may be
`contained in an amount of from 49.9 to 95.1 (more prefer-
`ably from 60.0 to 87.0), from 0.1 to 45.3 (more preferably
`from 4.0 to 31.0, most preferably from 4.0 to 10.0) and from
`4.8 to 50.0 (more preferably from 9.0 to 36.0) weight
`percent, respectively, based on the total weight of the dosage
`form. The component ratio may be determined depending on
`the kind of active ingredient used, the kind of polymers used,
`desired drug release profile and the like. In general,
`the
`resultant coated drugs with the above component ratio, may
`give good drug release profiles and taste-masking elfects.
`The process for preparing the above—mentioned oral dos-
`age forms will be described below.
`Firstly, a core or core particles may be prepared by mixing
`_ core materials containing a pharmaceutically active
`ingredient,
`low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose and
`microcrystalline cellulose and subject the mixed core mate-
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`RBP_TEVA05022336
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`

`
`US 6,221,402 B1
`
`5
`rials to wet agitation granulation, dry treatment and sieving
`treatment
`in this order. Methods for preparing the core
`particles, which can be used in this invention, are well
`described in Kokai H06-5 6700. For example, powders of an
`active ingredient such as sildenafil citrate is mixed with
`microcrystalline cellulose, L-IIPC and other additives such
`as a masking agent (e.g., calcium gluconate), binder (e.g.
`hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose), lubricant (e.g., tale), in a
`vessel of the granulator. Then, the mixture is granulated for
`10 to 60 minutes after addition of water at room temperature
`by a wet agitation granulation method known to those
`skilled in the art. The granulated core particles may be dried
`with a fluidized bed dryer and sieved, to obtain substantially
`spherical core particles. Preferably, the core particles may be
`fractionated to obtain fine particles having an average par-
`ticle size of 80 to 400, preferably 100 to 300 micrometers.
`Then, the core particles thus prepared may be coated with
`an inner coating layer on the core particles by spraying with
`an aqueous solution containing a water-soluble polymer; and
`then coated with an outer coating layer on the inner coating
`layer by spraying with an aqueous solution containing a
`saliva-insoluble polymer.
`The core particles may be coated by spraying with an
`aqueous solution composed of a water-soluble polymer,
`water-insoluble polymer, water and other additives such as
`tale in a centrifugal
`fluidizing granulator
`(e.g.,
`C14-Granulator under the trade name of CF-360 manufac-
`
`tured by Freund, Inc.). The coating conditions may be
`determined depending on the kind of granulator used, the
`kind of ingredients, component ratio and the like. Suitable
`conditions, when using the above CF-Granulator, may be a
`slit air temperature of 30 to 70° C.; a slit air rate of 200 to
`3501/min; a rotating speed of 100 to 200 rpm; a spray speed
`of 2 to 7 g/min; and a spray air pressure of 2 to 4 kg/C1112.
`After spray, the particles may be dried with, for example, a
`fluidized bed dryer or tray dryer.
`Further, the core particles maybe coated by spraying with
`an aqueous ethanolic solution (e.g., 80% EtOH) composed
`of a saliva-insoluble polymer, ethanol, water and other
`additives such as tale in a centrifugal fluidizing granulator
`(e.g., CF—Granulator under the tradename of CF—360 manu-
`factured by Freund, Inc.). The coating conditions may be
`determined depending on the kind of granulator used, the
`kind of ingredients, component ratio and the like. The
`similar conditions as mentioned above may be used. After
`spray,
`the particles may be dried with, for example, a
`fluidized bed dryer, and then oven—cured, to obtain three-
`layer core particles of this invention.
`In addition, to achieve a good taste and mouth feeling, a
`sugar coating layer may be formed on the outer coating layer
`of the three layer particles thus prepared. A known coating
`method can be used to form such sugar coating layer. For
`example,
`the three layer particles may be fed by spray
`solution composed of sucrose and D-mannitol dissolved in
`water under reasonable conditions. Xanthan gum (a polysac-
`charide generated from natural source) may be added to
`provide a good mouth feeling. The amount of the sugar
`coating layer may be in a range of 15.0 to 270.0 weight
`percent based on the total weight of the coated particle
`composed of the core, the inner and outer coating layers. The
`pharmacological dosage forms of this invention can be used
`in the form of fine granules, tablets, POS (powder for oral
`suspension), capsules or the like.
`
`6
`EXAMPLES AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES
`
`The present invention will be described in more details
`with reference to the following Working and Comparative
`Examples.
`(Materials Used)
`The following materials were used in the Working and
`Comparative Examples.
`Core Material
`Active Ingredient: Sildenafil citrate
`L-HPC: Low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose (LH-
`31; Shin-Etsu)
`MCC: Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH101, Asahi
`Chemical Industry)
`HPMC: Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose2910 as a binder
`(TC-5E, Shin-Etsu)
`Calcium gluconate (Tomita Pharmaceuticals).
`Inner Coating Layer
`Water-Soluble polymer:
`MPMC: Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose2910 (TC-5E,
`Shin-Etsu)
`Water-insoluble polymer: methacrylate copolymer
`(Eudragit NE30D, Rohm Pharma)
`Outer Coating Layer
`Saliva-insoluble polymer: aminoalkyl methacrylate
`copolymer under the trade name of Eudragit E100, (Rohm
`Pharma).
`When needed, other excipients such as talc and magne-
`sium stearate, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose and
`ethylcellulose, are added.
`
`Example 1
`(1) Manufacturing of Core Particles
`An active ingredient (sildenafil citrate, 210.66 g) was
`mixed with microcrystalline cellulose(300 g), L-HPC(97.2
`g), calcium gluconate(64.8 g), and hydroxypropyl methyl
`cellulose2910(7.2 g) as a binder in a vessel of the granulator.
`The amount ratio of the components used are indicated in
`Table 1. Then, the mixture was granulated by a wet agitation
`granulation method (Vertical Granulator, VG—05, Powrex)
`for 30 min after addition of water (699.0 g) at room
`temperature (blade speed, 200 rpm; cross screw speed, 3600
`rpm). The granulated cores were dried with a fluidized bed
`dryer (FBD) (Multiplex, MP-01, Powrex, Japan) and sieved
`to obtain core particles having an average diameter of
`177-297 micrometers.
`
`The fractionated core fine particles (177-297 mm) were
`coated with three layers (inner layer, outer layer, sugar layer)
`by using a centrifugal fluidizing granulator (CF—Granulator,
`CF-360, Freund).
`(2) Coating of Inner Layer
`The core particles (360.0 g) prepared in the above Step (1)
`were coated by spraying with the coating solution composed
`of TC-5E(30.2 g), Eudragit NE30D(20.1 g) and 378.2 g of
`water in a centrifugal fluidizing granulator (CF-Granulator,
`CF-360, Freund). Talc and magnesium stearate were added
`to protect the electrostatic aggregation of each particles. The
`amount ratio of the components used are indicated in Table
`1. The conditions used were as follows: slit air temperature,
`70° C.; slit air rate, 2501/min; rotating speed, 150 rpm, spray
`speed, 3.4 g/min; and spray air pressure, 3.0 kg/cmz. After
`spray,
`the particles were dried with fluidized bed dryer
`(Multiplex, MP-01, Powrex) for 25 min (inlet, 80° C. outlet,
`50° C.).
`
`_
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`RBP_TEVA05022337
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`

`
`US 6,221,402 B1
`
`7
`
`(3) Coating of Outer Layer
`Eudragit El00( 66.5 g), which was dissolved in 950.2 g of
`aqueous ethanolic solution (80% EtOII), was applied to coat
`on the inner
`layer-coated particles (190.0 g) with a
`CF-Granulator (slit air temperature, 34° C.; slit air rate, 300 5
`l/min; rotating speed, 140 rpm; spray speed, 5.0 g/min). The
`coating level of the outer layer was adjusted as indicated in
`Table 1. After spray, the particles were transferred to FBD
`and oven-cured at the same conditions described above to 10
`increase the protect effect to obtain three layer products.
`(4) Coating of Sugar Layer
`In some Examples and Comparative Examples, an addi-
`tional sugar layer coating was formed on the three-layer
`products as prepared in the above Step
`More 15
`specifically, the coated particles (137.8 g) were fed by spray
`solution composed of sucrose (170.5 g) and D—mannitol
`(55.0 g) dissolved in water (138.0 g) to the CF-Granulator to
`
`8
`form the sugar layer for adjustment of taste. The conditions
`used were same as those at protect coating except slit air
`temperature, 50° C. Aspartame (11.5 g) was added to
`provide the sweet taste for fine particles. Xanthan gum (0.4
`g) which is a polysaccharide generated from natural source
`is useful for good mouth feeling. During spraying titanium
`dioxide (7.7 g) and flavor(0.4 g) were supplied in a powder
`state. After drying in FBD (outlet air : 67° C.) and sieving
`(<500 mm), the sugar layer coated product was obtained.
`The amount of each ingredient used are as indicated in Table
`1(a).
`
`Examples 2 to 5 and Comparative Example
`
`The oral dosage forms were prepared in the same manner
`as indicated in Example 1 except that the amount of each
`ingredient was changed as shown in Tables 1(a) to 1(c).
`
`Cure Material
`
`Sildenafil
`talc
`L-HPC
`MCC
`HPMC
`Ca gluconate
`
`Total
`Inner Layer
`
`HPMC
`NE—30D
`Mg—St
`Tale
`
`Total
`Out Layer
`
`E100
`TC-SE
`Talc
`Mg-St
`
`Total
`Sub-total
`Sugar Layer
`
`Sucrose
`D—mannitol
`Primojel
`Xantan gum
`Asparteme
`Flavor
`TiO2
`
`Total
`
`Grand Total
`
`TABLE 1(a)
`
`Example 1
`
`Example 2
`
`Amount of
`Ingredient
`(myg)
`
`% of
`Core
`Ingredient
`
`Product % Amount of
`of
`Ingredient
`Coated
`(mg/g)
`
`% of
`Core
`Ingredient
`
`% of
`Coated
`Product
`
`210.220
`
`100.000
`
`1.200
`
`23.930
`245.739
`
`0.488
`
`9.738
`100.000
`
`444.96
`143.50
`
`1.00
`30.00
`1.00
`20.00
`
`640.46
`
`1000.00
`
`23.758
`39.912
`
`0.278
`8.344
`0.278
`5.563
`
`178.133
`
`278.134
`
`16.904
`
`116.904
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`RBP_TEVA05022338
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`

`
`US 6,221,402 B1
`
`TABLE 1(b)
`Example 3
`% of
`Core
`Ingredient
`
`% of
`Coated
`Product
`
`Amount of
`Ingredient
`(mg/g)
`
`Example 4
`% of
`Core
`Ingredient
`
`Amount of
`Ingredient
`(mg/g)
`
`% of
`Coated
`Product
`
`.
`
`100.000
`
`.
`
`.
`
`100.000
`
`24.065
`—
`6.877
`0.299
`31.241
`100.000
`
`112.090
`36.748
`—
`0.263
`7.875
`0.263
`5.250
`162.49
`
`262.489
`
`Core Material
`
`Sildenafil
`talc
`L—HPC
`MCC
`HPMC
`Ca gluconate
`Total
`Inner Layer
`HPMC
`NE-30D
`Mg-St
`Tale
`
`Total
`Out Layer
`E100
`TC-5E
`Talc
`Mg—St
`Total
`Sub Total
`Sugar Layer
`Sucrose
`D-mannitol
`Primojel
`Xantan gum
`Asparteme
`Flavor
`TiO2
`Total
`
`—
`—
`0.30
`36.11
`274.85
`
`533.15
`140.00
`—
`1.00
`30.00
`1.00
`20.00
`725.15
`
`—
`—
`0.110
`13.140
`100.000
`
`193.979
`50.937
`—
`0.364
`10.915
`0.364
`7.277
`263.836
`
`427.03
`140.00
`—
`1.00
`30.00
`1.00
`20.00
`619.03
`
`Grand Total
`
`1000.00
`
`363.836
`
`1000.00
`
`TABLE 1(c)
`
`EXamEle 5
`% of
`Core
`Ingredient
`
`Amount of
`Ingredient
`(mg/g)
`
`% of
`Coated
`Product
`
`ComEaratiVe EXamEle 1
`Amount of
`% of
`% of
`Ingredient
`Core
`Coated
`(mg/g)
`Ingredient
`Product
`
`.
`
`.
`
`..
`
`.
`
`100.000
`
`.
`
`.
`
`100.000
`
`Core Material
`
`Sildenafil
`talc
`L-HPC
`MCC
`HPMC
`Ca gluconate
`polysorbate 80
`Citric acid
`
`Total
`Inner Layer
`
`HPMC
`NE-30D
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`RBP_TEVA05022339
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`

`
`11
`
`US 6,221,402 B1
`
`TABLE 1(c)-continued
`Example 5
`%of
`Core
`Ingredient
`
`% of
`Coated
`Product
`
`Comparative Example 1
`Amount of
`‘.70 of
`% of
`Core
`Coated
`Ingredient
`Product
`Ingredient
`(mg/g)
`—
`1.37
`
`43.053
`100.000
`
`82.558
`31.631
`—
`0.226
`6.778
`0.226
`4.519
`
`125.94
`
`225.938
`
`Amount of
`Ingredient
`(mg/g)
`0.16
`i
`26.65
`
`441.26
`140.00
`—
`1.00
`30.00
`1.00
`20.00
`
`633.26
`
`Mg-St
`Tale
`
`Total
`Out Layer
`E100
`TC-5E
`Talc
`Mg-St
`Total
`Sub-total
`Sugar layer
`Sucrose
`D-mannitol
`Primojel
`Xantan gum
`Asparteme
`Flavor
`TiO2
`
`Total
`
`0.044
`1.033
`
`7.266
`
`28.574
`100.000
`
`120.320
`38.174
`—
`0.273
`8.180
`0.273
`5.453
`
`172.673
`
`24.07
`
`—
`—
`1.50
`190.55
`442.60
`
`365.40
`140.00
`—
`1 .00
`30.00
`1.00
`20.00
`
`557.40
`
`(jrand Total
`
`1000.00
`
`272.673
`
`1000.00
`
`EXPERIMENTS
`
`(1) Bitterness Test
`Five (5) panelists held 1 g of the three or four layered
`products prepared by the above procedures in their mouth
`for 1 min, and measured a time period until
`they felt
`bitterness. The average time (in seconds) was used for
`evaluation. The desirable masking time period is more than
`50 seconds. The results are indicated in Table 2.
`
`(2) Drug Release Test
`According to the guideline published by Minister of
`Health and Welfare (MHW) in Japan, the dissolution test
`were conducted in each three media (pH 1.2, 4.0, and 6.5).
`Further, the dissolution tests in media of pH5.0, 5.5, 6.0
`
`were also investigated to predict the in vivo dissolution of
`lower- and non-gastric acidity humans. The release experi-
`ments from the particles were performed by the Japanese
`Pharmacopeia (JP) paddle method in 900 ml of media at 37°
`C. The three or four layered products prepared in the above
`procedures were spread over the media with constant stirring
`at 100 rpm. The media used in this study were the 1st fluid
`(disintegration test
`fluid, Japanese Pharmacopoeia 13,
`pH1.2), 0.1M acetate buffer (pH4.0), and 0.05M phosphate
`buffers (pH5.5, 6.0, 6.5). The drug release properties were
`evaluated as the amount of the drug released after 5, 10 and
`15 minutes from the introduction of the drugs into each
`media. The results are indicated in Table 2.
`
`TABLE 2
`
`Examples
`
`Comp. Desirable
`
`1
`
`>120
`
`2
`
`>55
`
`3
`
`>75
`
`4
`
`>120
`
`5
`
`>53
`
`Example Value
`
`>120
`
`>50 sec.
`
`Bitterness Test (sec.)
`(Drug Release Test)
`RA (%, pH 1.2 after 5 min.)
`RA (%, pH 1.2 after 10 min.)
`RA (%, pH 1.2 after 20 min.)
`RA (%, pH 4.0 after 5 min.)
`RA (%, pH 4.0 after 10 min.)
`RA (%, pH 4.0 after 20 min.
`RA (%, pH 5.5 after 5 min.)
`RA (%, pH 5.5 after 10 min.)
`RA (%, pH 5.5 after 20 min.)
`RA (%, pH 6.0 after 5 min.)
`RA (%, pII 6.0 after 10 min.)
`RA (%, pH 6.0 after 20 min.)
`RA (%, pH 6.5 after 2.5 min.)
`RA (%, pH 6.5 after 5 min.)
`RA (%, pH 6.5 after 20 min.)
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`RBP_TEVA05022340
`
`TEVA EXHIBIT 1011
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. MONOSOL RX, LLC
`
`

`
`US 6,221,402 B1
`
`13
`As shown in Table 2, it was confirmed that the oral dosage
`forms of this invention (Examples 1 to 5) have good taste
`masking properties and good drug release profiles.
`More specifically,
`the time period until panelists felt
`bitterness showed more than 50 sec. in all examples. Further,
`it was found that the oral dosage forms of this invention have
`fast onset release profiles in media within a range of pH1.2
`to pH5.5 (gastric juice). It was reported that pH values of the
`empty stomach in thirty subjects varied from less than 2 to
`5.5. It was also confirmed that the release profiles, of the
`products of this invention, in media of pH value ranging 1.2
`to 5.5 were satisfactory even in the case of lower- and
`non-acidity humans.
`Further, normal humans have a saliva with a pH value of
`about 6.5, and thus small drug release amount after 2.5
`minutes stirring from administration in the media with pH
`6.5 is preferable. The release profiles, at pII6.5, of the
`products of this invention showed the sigmoidal release
`pattern, that is, the rapid release profile after the time lag for
`a few minutes. This is a good drug release profile since some
`aged patients have a gastric juice with a pH value of about
`6.5. In this case, preferably the drug should be released in an
`amount of more than 30% after 20 minutes stirring. The
`desirable dissolution value at 20 min, was 30% (pH6.5)
`rather than 75% (pH 1.2, 4.0, 5.5, 6.0), since the solubility
`of sildenafil at pH6.5 is low. All
`the products of this
`invention showed a drug release percentage, at pH 6.5 after
`20 minutes stirring, of more than 30% although the product
`prepared in the Comparative Example showed a drug release
`percentage of only 5 .4.
`In summary, it was substantiated that the oral dosage
`forms of this invention have good drug release properties
`and good taste-masking properties.
`What is claimed is:
`
`1. A rapidly releasing and taste-masking pharmaceutical
`dosage form comprising a core containing a pharmaceuti-
`cally active ingredient, low-substituted hydroxypropyl cel-
`lulose containing not less than 5.0% and not more than
`16.0% hydroxypropoxy groups on a dried basis, and micro-
`crystalline cellulose,
`the amount of the microcrystalline
`cellulose being at least 26.0 weight percent based on the
`total weight of the core; an inner coating layer formed on the
`core and containing a water-soluble polymer; and an outer
`coating layer formed on the inner coating layer and con-
`taining a saliva-insoluble polymer, wherein the core, the
`inner coating layer and the outer coating layer are contained
`in an amount of from 60.0 to 87.0, from 4.0 to 31.0 and from
`9.0 to 36.0 weight percent, respectively, based on the total
`weight of the dosage form.
`2. A dosage form according to claim 1, which is further
`coated by a sugar coating layer formed on the outer coating
`layer in an amount of 15.0 to 270.0 weight percent based on
`
`14
`the total weight of a coated particle composed of the core,
`the inner and outer coating layers.
`3. A dosage for

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket