throbber
Filed: February 26, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________
`
`
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MONOSOL RX, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`______________
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00281
`Patent 8,603,514 B2
`______________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Petitioner submits the following current
`
`exhibit list:
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`Description
`U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514 (filed July 10, 2007)
`
`File History, U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514
`
`Expert Declaration of Jayanth Panyam, Ph.D., Relating to U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,603,514
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,067,116 (filed Mar. 23, 2000) (“Bess”)
`
`WO 00/42992 (published July 27, 2000) (“Chen”)
`
`CA 2,274,910 (published June 25, 1998) (“Cremer”)
`
`File History of Reexam No. 95/002,170
`
`Alfred Martin, Physical Pharmacy (4th ed. 1993) (“Physical
`
`Pharmacy”)
`
`Joint Claim Construction Chart, Reckitt Benckiser Inc. v. Teva
`
`Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., CA. No. 14-01451-RGA (Nov. 17,
`
`2015), D.I. 91
`
`Trial Transcript, Reckitt Benckiser Inc. v. Watson Labs., Inc.,
`
`CA No. 14-1574-RGA (Nov. 3-4, 2015) (“Trial Tr.”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,221,402 (issued April 24, 2001)
`
`C.S. Fuller et al., Interactions in poly(ethylene oxide)—
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`hydroxypropyl methylcellulose blends, 42 Polymer 9583 (2001)
`
`Leon Lachman et al, The Theory and Practice of Industrial
`
`Pharmacy (1986) (“The Theory and Practice of Industrial
`
`Pharmacy”)
`
`J. Thuro Carstensen, Theory of Pharmaceutical Systems Volume
`
`II: Heterogenous Systems (1973) (“Theory of Pharmaceutical
`
`Systems”)
`
`Remington’s Pharmaceutical Sciences (Alfonso R. Gennaro, ed.,
`
`18th ed., 1990)
`
`Mixing in the Process Industries (N. Harnby et al., eds., 2nd ed.,
`
`1997)
`
`Sevim Kaya & Ahmet Kaya, Microwave drying effects on
`
`properties of whey protein isolate edible films, 43 Journal of
`
`Food Engineering 91 (2000)
`
`X.Z. Shu et al., Novel pH-sensitive citrate cross-linked chitosan
`
`film for drug controlled release, 212 International Journal of
`
`Pharmaceutics 19 (2001)
`
`T.J. Bowser & L.R. Wilhelm, Modeling Simultaneous
`
`Shrinkage and Heat and Mass Transfer of a Thin, Nonporous
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`Film During Drying, Vol. 60 No. 4 Journal of Food Science 753
`
`(Nov. 4, 1995)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,596,298 (filed September 14, 1999)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,099,865 (filed June 11, 1999)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,166,233 (filed January 31, 1990)
`
`Jian-Hwa Guo & Horst Zerbe, Water Soluble Film for Oral
`
`Administration, The 24th International Symposium on
`
`Controlled Release of Bioactive Materials 227 (1997) (“Guo”)
`
`J.P. Cassidy et al., Controlled buccal delivery of buprenorphine,
`
`25 Journal of Controlled Release 21 (1993)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,849,246 (issued July 18, 1989)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,393,528 (filed June 1, 1993)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,948,430 (filed August 1, 1997) (“Zerbe”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,629,003 (filed September 2, 1994)
`
`EP No. 0,090,560 (published May 3, 1989) (“Mitra”)
`
`Remington’s Pharmaceutical Sciences (John E. Hoover ed., 15th
`
`ed. 1975)
`
`Arlene Weintraub, It's On The Tip Of Your Tongue, Bloomberg
`
`(July 30, 2006),
`
`4
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/20060730/
`
`itsonthetipofyourtongue
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,552,024 (filed Nov. 5, 1999)
`
`WO 2001/70194 (published September 27, 2001)
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Jayanth Panyam, Ph.D.
`
`Materials Considered by Jayanth Panyam, Ph.D.
`
`S. Le Person et al., Near Infrared Drying of Pharmaceutical Thin
`
`Films: Experimental Analysis of Internal Mass Transport, 37
`
`Chemical Engineering & Processing 257 (1998) (“Le Person”)
`
`Decision on Appeal Regarding U.S. Patent 7,666,337, Appeal
`
`2014-00893
`
`Decision on Appeal Regarding U.S. Patent 7,824,588, Appeal
`
`2014-000547
`
`Decision on Appeal Regarding U.S. Patent 7,897,080, Appeal
`
`2014-007671
`
`Telephone Conference Transcript, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA,
`
`Inc. v. Monsol RX LLC and Indivior, IPR2016-00280,
`
`IPR2016-00281, and IPR2016-00282 (Feb. 17, 2016)
`
`5
`
`

`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s directive during the parties’ February 17, 2016 call
`
`with the Board, Petitioner herewith files Exhibit 1040, Telephone Conference
`
`Transcript, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Monsol RX LLC and Indivior,
`
`IPR2016-00280, IPR2016-00281, and IPR2016-00282 (Feb. 17, 2016).
`
`
`
`Dated: February 26, 2016
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Elizabeth J. Holland/
`Elizabeth J. Holland (Reg. No. 47,657)
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`Tel: 212-813-8800
`Fax: 212-355-3333
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing: PETITIONER’S
`
`UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST and accompanying Exhibit 1040 were served
`
`electronically via e-mail on February 26, 2016 on the following:
`
`Daniel A. Scola, Jr.
`
`dscola@hbiplaw.com
`
`Michael I. Chakansky
`
`mchakansky@hbiplaw.com
`
`514ipr@hbiplaw.com
`
`By: /Cynthia Lambert Hardman/
` Cynthia Lambert Hardman
`(Reg. No. 53,179)
`
`7
`
`
`Dated: February 26, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket