`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAID TECHNOLOGIES INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`YODLEE, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00273
`Patent 6,317,783
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MATTHEW MCCULLOUGH IN SUPPORT OF
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`YODLEE 2003
`PLAID TECHNOLOGIES V. YODLEE, INC.
`IPR2016‐00273
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00273
`Attorney Docket No: 12233-0047IP1
`
`DECLARATION OF MATTHEW MCCULLOUGH IN
`SUPPORT OF PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO
`HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`I, Matthew McCullough, declare the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of California, and am
`
`admitted to practice in the United States District Courts for the Northern and
`
`Eastern Districts of California, the United States District Court for the Eastern
`
`District of Texas, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of
`
`Illinois.
`
`2.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of Federal
`
`Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`I have not previously applied to appear pro hac vice before the Office.
`2
`
`
`
`7.
`
`
`
`
`
`I have experience representing clients in patent cases involving a wide range
`
`Case IPR2016-00273
`Attorney Docket No: 12233-0047IP1
`
`
`8.
`
`of products and technology, including cloud-based enterprise software, video game
`
`systems, data compression algorithms, mobile device software and hardware, and
`
`other consumer products. I have litigated patent cases not only before various
`
`federal district courts, but also before the International Trade Commission. I have
`
`represented clients in many phases of litigation. I have also worked extensively
`
`with technical experts and inventors. I have particular experience relevant to the
`
`patent-at-issue, having worked with Yodlee on the inter partes review and covered
`
`business method review petitions involving this patent.
`
`9.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patents issued
`
`3
`
`
`
`thereon.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00273
`Attorney Docket No: 12233-0047IP1
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Matthew McCullough
`Matthew McCullough
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: 650-839-5065
`Email: mccullough@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: 7/7/2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`7/6/2016
`
`Matt McCullough | Attorney Redwood City, CA | Fish
`
`Matt McCullough
`Associate
`
`
`
` Redwood City, CA 650-839-5108
`
`
` mccullough@fr.com
`
`Background
`
`Matt McCullough is an Associate in the litigation group in Fish & Richardson’s Silicon Valley office. He has a background in computer
`engineering, and has represented clients in federal court and in Section 337 investigations before the International Trade Commission.
`Mr. McCullough’s practice emphasizes patent litigation, inter partes review, and intellectual property litigation in venues across the
`country and covering a wide range of products and technology, including cloud-based enterprise software, video game systems, data
`compression algorithms, mobile device software and hardware, and other consumer products. In addition to patent litigation, Mr.
`McCullough also assists clients with trade secret litigation, patent due diligence, trade secret due diligence, and other non-litigation
`related patent analysis.
`
`Services
`• Litigation
`
`Education
`J.D., Harvard Law School 2014
`Submissions Manager, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology
`
`B.S.E., University of Michigan 2011
`Computer Engineering
`summa cum laude, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu
`
`Admissions
`• California 2014
`
`• U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
`
`• U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
`
`• U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
`
`• U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`
`© 2016 - Fish & Richardson
`
`
`
`http://www.fr.com/mattmccullough/
`
`1/1
`
`6
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
