throbber
Legaltranslations. biz
`
`
`
`
`
`(Division of Nelles Translations)
`
`
`
`
`
`20 N. Wacker Drive -Suite 1408 -Chicago, IL 60606 -312-977-9772 Fax-866-61 5-8606
`
`
`
`Certification
`
`VERIFIED TRANSLATION OF DOCWt,fENT & DECLARATION
`Tlte undersigned, oftlie below address, hereby certifies and declares tlzat he/she knows well both tl,e
`
`
`
`
`
`of tile document and Fre11cJ, languages, and that the a/Jaclted is mt accurate translation
`English
`
`
`listed below:
`
`• Anna/es Francaises
`
`Anesthesie
`du Diprivan
`
`
`
`
`
`Reanimation-Interactions physicochimiques et mode de conservation
`
`I hereby declare tlzat all stateme11ts ill lite tn111slatioll made herein of my own kllowledge are true and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that all statements made i1t the tra11s/atio11 011 information and belief are believed IQ he true. Further,
`
`
`
`
`and the tliat willful false stat.eme/lts these statements i11 tlze trans/atiott were malle with lite knowledge
`
`
`
`like so made are punishable byfine, imprisomne11t, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 oftlie
`
`
`United States Code.
`
`
`
`Signed tliis 6th day of Febrllluy, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`Signatm�
`Name: Lisa Lapl,m e
`
`
`Address: Newtow11, CT 06470
`
`
`
`
`
`Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the County of Cook, State of Illinois, on
`
`
`
`February 6, 2015.
`
`Marigr ace Clark,
`Notary
`
`CfflCW. .SfAL
`�a.ARK
`NOTMY ,ueuc ·� STATE� lll.ftOIS
`MY CCWSSION
`EXPIRES:10/29/18
`
`Bass and Spangenberg
`v.
`Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,476,010
`Exhibit 1007
`
`Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`©Masson, Paris.
`Ann FrAnesth Rea11im 13:453-456 1994
`
`WORKSHOP: DIPRIVAN®
`
`Physio-Chemical Interactions and Storage of Diprivan®
`
`Physio-Chemical Interactions and Storage ofDiprivan®
`
`R. FARJNOTTI
`Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Bichat-Cfaude-Bernard Hospital, 46, me Henri-Huchard, 75878 Paris Cede.x 18
`
`ABSTRACT I RECOMMENDATIONS
`
`There is very little literature available that addresses the physio-chemical interactions and stability of Diprivan®.
`On the basis of current experience, this agent is safe for use in polypropylene or polypropylene/polyethylene
`syringes, diluted I to 5 in 5% glucose if necessa1y. The potential hazards are as follows:
`
`I) Propofol may undergo oxidation when not stored in nitrogen, or when in contact with oxidizing agents
`(active ingredients or excipients of other preparations).
`2) The emulsion may be destabilized by contact with mineral or organic cations (calcium, magnesium, dibasic
`amino acids, etc.) or acids (citric acid, etc.);
`3) Losses ofpropofol may occur by adsorption-diffusion (surface adherence combined with penetration of
`plastic material) during storage in PVC bags or during administration by means of PVC infusion sets.
`Most of these hazards still have to be evaluated under controlled situations.
`
`Key word~: MFJJ!!.AT!()NS: storage, physio-chemical interactions; PR()P()F()f.
`
`Diprivan® is an injectable emulsion of propofol at l%
`weight/volume. Propofol or diisopropyl 2.6-phenol has
`low solubility in water at physiological pH. On the other
`hand, its octanol-water partition coefficient is high ( 15 with
`pH = 7.4). TI1is property has directed its galenic form of
`application to incorporation into a water/oil emulsion
`(W/0) in
`the oil phase:
`lntralipid® at 10% (Kabi
`Pharmacia). TI1e definition of the physio-chemical
`interactions and the way Diprivan® is stored must
`therefore be considered whilst taking into account the
`methods of administration, and the dmg combinations and
`their effect on the stability of propofol and on the stability
`of the excipient.
`
`CHEMICAL STABILITY OF PROPOFOL
`
`the identification of two degradation products:
`a dimer or tetraisopropyl 3.3',5.5' - dihydroxy
`4.4' biphenyl
`a quinone or diisopropyl 2.6- quinone
`
`These two compounds are formed in the presence of
`oxygen, which has made packaging and storage for
`Diprivan® (in nitrogen) necessary.
`Propofol's redox potential is lower than +0.60 V [6],
`likelihood of interactions with
`which suggests
`the
`oxidizing molecules. This property excludes the use of
`preservatives in the Diprivan® fonnula, whose sterility
`can be maintained only through the integrity of the final
`container.
`
`PHYSIO-CHEMICAL
`INTRALIPID®
`
`STABILITY OF
`
`10%
`
`Propofol is a phenol. As such, it is an electron donor, Intralipid® is an oil-in-water emulsion of soybean oil, egg
`lecithin,
`which, when exposed to an acceptor, may oxidize. This
`reducing nature of propofol has been demonstrated by
`
`Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`454
`
`glycerol and water for injection. The stability of the emulsion
`is achieved mainly tJu·ough the negative charges carried by
`the lecithin around dispersed lipid droplets. These charges
`maintain
`repelling
`forces between
`the droplets and
`counteract flocculation, creaming and coalescence. [3).
`The addition of various components, i.n an aqueous solution
`in
`the continuous phase of the emulsion, represents a
`potential destabilization factor by neutralizing the charges.
`This neutralization leads to an increase in the size of the
`lipid droplets. In this way, U1e cations, and in particular the
`trivalent and divalent cations such as caJcium at 7mmol
`L 1
`, lead to the creaming of the 20% Intra lipid® in 24 hours.
`This same phenomenon is observed in the presence of acid
`compounds. Glucose solutions contain traces of acids
`formed during heat sterilization. These traces neutralize the
`(negative) phosphate functions of the lecithin and can
`destabilize the emulsion. Consequently,
`the maximum
`accepted dilution of Oiprivan® in glucose solution at 5% is
`to 5
`I
`(one
`part Diprivan®
`to
`four
`parts
`
`of5% glucose solution).
`All sn1dies on the stability and storage of the pre-mix of
`Dipravan and another dmg must take into account the criteria
`for the stability of the emulsion. One must check, in
`particular, U1at there is no creaming due to a coalescence of
`the lipid globules; the average size of the globules (0.2 11m)
`and the size distribution; the number of globules larger than
`2 11111 (nonnal < 5000/mL of emulsion); and the pH of the
`aqueous phase, whose reduction reveals the production of
`free fatty acids through hydrolysis of ilie soybean oil and U1e
`egg phosphatides.
`
`STABILITY OF DIPRIVAN®
`
`Storage in diverse conditions (ampoules, vials) at an
`ambient temperature (25°C) for three years did not show
`any changes in the characteristics of the dmg. It is simply
`specified that it should not be frozen as this will obviously
`destroy the emulsion.
`
`Studies of Compatibility with U1e Container
`
`R. FARINOTTI
`
`Glass Vial
`
`In Type I glass vial packaging, we note good stability of
`Diprivan® and a lack of adsorption of propofol on ilie
`brornobutyl stopper. There is no interaction between the
`stopper and the lipid emulsion.
`
`Sy1inges.: Administration in a Bolus or Using a Syringe
`Pump
`
`The studies [4] were condu.cted with 20 mL and 50 mL
`syringes
`made
`from
`polypropylene
`or
`polypropylene/polyethylene
`for
`the purpose of
`understanding the stability of Diprivan® and its effect
`on ilie syringe.
`A static model (20 mL and 50 mL syringe over 24 hrs.)
`and a dynamic model (50 mL syringe, four hrs. of rest -1
`then 20 Ius. of administration at 2 mL * hr.
`) were
`implemented. The usual physio-chemical measures show
`that iliere are no changes in the emulsion's characteristics.
`We note a loss ofpropofol (< 5%), with no appearance of
`degradation products, which suggests an adsorption with
`or without associated diffusion in plastic materials.
`Propofol does not alter the mechanical properties of the
`syringe (which must not be refilled repeatedly).
`
`Bacterial Filters
`
`8JORAKER (2] has studied changes in ilie distribution of
`lipid vesicles induced through filtration of Diprivan® on
`0.22 ~m bacterial filters. Filtration on 19-mm diameter
`MSf cameo riS filters does not change ilie emulsion's
`characteristics, whereas vesicles larger U1an 0.72 ~m are
`partially retained on the 28-mm diameter Baxter®
`2C5662 filter. Filtration on a bacterial fi lter cannot be
`reconunended in a clinical setting, due to ilie weak
`surfaces of available filters (which limit the flow) and to
`possible changes in the emulsion's properties due to the
`type of filter used [2].
`
`BASIS: Equipment Required for Adtninistration
`DAILY
`A
`ON
`DIPRIVAN®
`COMPATffifLITIES AND INCOMPATIBILITIES
`
`Studies published on the topic are virtually non- existent.
`The only data available come from the manufacntring
`laborntory. The compatibility of Diprivan® with
`its
`container (the S)'linge necessary for adnlinistration), with
`solid solutes and with other active ingredients must be
`explored one by one.
`
`The study by BA1LEY and colleagues [I], which was
`conducted using dilutions at I to 5 of Diprivan® in the
`5% glucose solution, found that:
`The passage ofDiprivan® through a 5 ~m filter
`in
`does not cause any modifications
`the drug's
`composition, which authorizes this practice for retaining
`particles emanating from the packaging;
`Propofol coats (adsorption) and eventually
`penetrates (diffusion) polyvinyl chloride tubing: a static(cid:173)
`mode study (a 2-m line for 2 hrs.) reveals a 31 to 35%
`loss
`
`Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`DIPRNAN®
`
`455
`
`of propofol after 2 hrs. (with no appearance of degradation
`products).
`This model likely encourages the diffusion of propofol,
`given that the dynamic model (flow = 1.75 mL · min ·1
`corresponding to a dose of 0.05 mg · kg ·1 · min ·1 for a
`patient weighing 70 kg) does not show any quantifiable
`losses after one hour. A loss of 8% is observed after two
`hours.
`These results are easily explained by the hydrophobic
`characteristics of propofol and PVC [polyvinyl chloride].
`They suggest that the adsorption-diffusion phenomenon
`depends on the speed of administration. In the absence of
`studies on interactions between containers and their
`contents, these results suggest that the greatest caution
`should be exercised with regard to PVC bags.
`The trials perfonned by Zeneca Phanna laboratories show
`that the premix of Diprivan® and 5% glucose solution
`at a ratio of I : 4v/v in a PVC bag must be limited to a
`total volume of 500 rnL and kept for a maximum of six
`hours.
`
`Compatibility ofDiprivan® with Injectable Solutions
`
`Extemporaneous Mixture
`Diprivan® can be administered in a Y-tube
`without risk of mptming the emulsion with 5% glucose
`solution, 0.9% sodium. chloride, mixtures (5% glucose -
`0.45% sodium chloride or 5% glucose - 0.2% sodium
`chloride) or Ringer's lactate.
`
`Compatibility with Other A.ctive Ingredients [5]
`A 20-mL dose of propofol was mixed with I mL of
`lidocaine (1% xylocainc), mixed and stored for two hours
`in a syringe (Gillette Sabre polyethylene/polypropylene)
`at room temperature and ambient light. We did not
`observe any changes
`in physicochemical stability.
`However, the emulsion is unstable under continuous
`agitation. Thus, the mixture can be created to reduce pain
`upon inj ection. Nevertheless, it must be used immediately.
`
`Motphine-Like Substances, Curare-Like Substances and
`Atropine-Like Substances
`There are no published studies regarding the stability of
`Diptivan® with these dmgs.
`Analysis of the structure of active ingredients and the
`composition of galenical forms used suggests that there is
`a risk of destabilization of the emulsion in the presence of
`quatemary ammonias (curares) and citric acid (sufentanil
`excipient). This risk is perhaps negligible due to the weak
`concentrations used. Trials conducted by Zeneca Pharma
`laboratories show that it is possible:
`To mix Diprivan® and alfentanil in ratios of 20
`p.l and 50 p.l. The emulsions obtained must be
`administered within a maximum of six hours. The
`mixhtres created in ratios of less than 20 : I must be
`administered immediately.
`To simultaneously administer, by means of a Y(cid:173)
`connector, Diprivan® and pancuronium or
`suxamethonium hydrochloride, vecuronium, atropine,
`fentanyl and alfentanil.
`However, alracurium and mivacurium must not be
`extemporaneously mixed with or added to Dip1·ivan®.
`
`BrBLIOGRAPHY
`
`ll1e references are preceded:
`by a • when they are of particular interest,
`by • • in case of major interest.
`
`PremLt: Use in Administration
`The compatibility of Diprivan® with different injectable
`solutions, in variable proportions, was studied over a
`period of24 hours.
`The evolution of parameters, i.e. chemical (propofol
`content, pH) and physical (appearance, absence of an oily
`surface, average size of globules, number of globules larger
`than 2 Jlm) shows that Diprivan® can be mixed with a 5%
`glucose solution (neutral glass containers).
`The maximum acceptable dilution is I to 5 (I : 4 v/v). It
`must be used within six hours after its preparation, a factor
`Propofol
`that must be taken into account when it is to be used in
`PVC.
`sedation.
`2.
`Prernixing Diprivan® with 0.9% sodium chloride is •
`unstable and must not be done.
`There is no published study that refers to the stability of
`Diprivan® premixed in Ringer's lactate. The sodium and
`calcium ion content of this solution does not lead to a
`theoretical risk of destabilization of the emulsion within
`six hours. However, an experimental study is necessary,
`and premixing Diprivan® with Ringer's lactate is not
`recommended.
`
`I.
`•
`
`BAILEY LC, TANG KT, RoGOZISKI BA. Effect
`of syringe filter and IV administration set on delivery
`of propofol emulsion. Am J Hosp Pharm, 48: 2627-
`2630, 199 1.
`is adsorbed imo PVC; it may diffuse intensely in
`
`8JORAKER DG. Lipid emulsion changes induced
`by 0.22 ~tm filtration of propofol. Anesthesiology,
`79: A 1099, 1993.
`TI1e nature of 1he filter interferes with the emulsion's specific
`distribution.
`3.
`CHAUMElLJC, BROSSARD D. Stabili1y oflipid
`• •
`emulsions used in parenteral nutrition. Nlllr C/in
`Merabol, 7: 54-64, 1993.
`Lipid emulsions are unstable in the presence of cations and
`acids.
`
`Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`456
`
`DIPRIVAN®
`
`Diprivan® compatibility with plastic syringes.
`4.
`Internal document, Zeneca Phan na_
`• •
`There is no incompatibility of Diprivan® v.~th syringes
`made from polypropylene or polyethylene/polypropylene.
`5.
`Diprivan® injection compatibility with
`• •
`lignocaine injection. Internal document, Zeneca
`Phanna.
`Extemporaneous mixture is possible.
`
`6.
`
`UEBEL RA, WruM CA, HAWTR£ v AO, CoETZ££
`J. Electrochemical determination of 2.6-
`diisopropylpheno[ after high performance liquid
`chromatography of extracts from serum.
`J Chromatogr Biomed Appl, 526 : 293-295,
`1990.
`Propofol 's oxidation potential is less than + 0.6 volts.
`
`ABSTRACT I RECOMM.ENDATlONS
`
`There is very little literature available that addresses the physio-chemical interactions and stability of Diprivan®.
`On the basis of current experience, this agent is safe for use in polypropylene or polypropylene/polyethylene
`syringes, diluted I to 5 in 5% glucose if necessary. ll1e potential hazards are as follows:
`
`l) Propofol may undergo oxidation when not stored in nitrogen, or when in contact with oxidizing agents
`(active ingredients or excipients of other preparations).
`2) The emulsion may be destabilized by contact with mineral or organic cations (calcium, magnesium, dibasic
`amino acids, etc.) or acids (citric acid, etc.);
`3) Losses of propofolmay occur by adsorption-diffusion (surface adherence combined with penetration of
`plastic material) during storage in PVC bags or during administration by means of PVC infusion sets.
`Most of these hazards still have to be evaluated under controlled situations.
`
`Exh. 1007

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket