throbber
Downloaded from Downloaded from
`
`
`
`journal.pda.orgjournal.pda.org
`
`
`
` on December 3, 2015 on December 3, 2015
`
`The Effect on Syringe Performance of Fluid Storage and
`epeated Use: Implications for Syringe Pumps
`avid F. Capes, Dennis Herring, V. Bruce Sunderland, et al.
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`(cid:160)D
`
`
`
` PDA J Pharm Sci and Tech
`
`1996
`
`50,
`
` 40-50
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2005
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`journal.pda.org
`
` on December 3, 2015
`
`RESEARCH ARTICLE
`
`The Effect on Syringe Performance of Fluid Storage and Repeated Use:
`Implications for Syringe Pumps
`
`DAVID F. CAPES*†, DENNIS HERRING*, V. BRUCE SUNDERLAND*, DALE McMILLAN†and
`CHARLES MCDONALD†
`
`†School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Bentley and ‡Chemistry Centre of Western Australia, East Perth, Western Australia.
`
`ABSTRACT: Syringe stiction has been reported to cause syringe pump malfunction, hence the effect on syringe
`performance of syringe use and the formulations used in the syringe were investigated. The force required for
`syringe plunger motion (at 2.5 mm min -1), when filled with soybean oil emulsion (SBOE) and with water, and the
`extraction of silicone oil from syringes by these fluids, were measured for Primo®, Talus and Terumo® 10 mL, and
`Terumo 50 mL syringes. The breakloose, average extrusion and maximum force required to maintain plunger
`motion increased after storage ofSBOEfor7days in all syringes tested (p < 0.05). The storage of water increased
`the breakloose force of all syringes, but only increased the maximum force of Talus syringes, and both the average
`extrusion and maximum forces of Terumo 10 mL syringes. The mechanism for this is most likely swelling of the
`elastomer of the piston due to sorption of fluid. The force was found to increase logarithmically with repeated
`syringe use. Electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectroscopy was used to measure the silicone oil
`content of syringe extractions. Three extractions were performed: repeated flushing, vigorous washing, and storage
`for 7 days with occasional agitation. Up to 69.4% of the silicone oil present in the syringes was extracted with both
`water and SBOE when they were stored or washed. In contrast to water, SBOE also extracted the lubricant when
`the syringe was filled and flushed immediately. If syringes are refilled, stored filled before use, or used over a
`prolonged period, particularly with a SBOE formulation, syringe stiction may occur during infusion with a syringe
`pump.
`
`Introduction
`
`Syringe pumps have become popular for intravenous
`drug infusion in intensive care, coronary care, and
`neonatal units because of the need for accurate infusion
`rates while administering minimal volumes. Drugs com(cid:173)
`monly given by syringe pumps are those for short-term
`and prolonged anesthesia and sedation including hypnot(cid:173)
`ics such as midazolam and propofol, opioid analgesics,
`neuromuscular blocking agents such as atracurium and
`vecuronium, and those for hemodynamic support such
`as dopamine and epinephrine. These drugs are pre(cid:173)
`sented as aqueous solutions except propofol, which, due
`to low solubility in water, is formulated in a 10% soybean
`oil emulsion (1). Diazepam is also available formulated
`in a 15% soybean oil emulsion (2) and may be infused by
`syringe pump. The emulsion may be infused by syringe
`pump for parenteral nutrition of neonates (3,4).
`In medical practice-syringe pumps are used with
`commercially available disposable syringes that have
`been primarily designed for manual use. There have
`been reports of syringe pump malfunction due to so
`
`Received November 11, 1994. Accepted for publication July 21, 1995.
`* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: School of
`Pharmacy, Curtin University of Technology, GPO BoxU1987, Perth
`6001, Australia.
`This work was supported by Go Medical Industries Pty. Ltd. and in
`part by ICI Australia Hospital Products Pty. Ltd.
`
`called syringe "stiction," sticking of the piston during
`movement down the barrel (5, 6). Stiction occurs when
`the syringe pump fails to overcome the friction between
`the syringe piston and barrel, causing uneven, jerky
`movements and hence fluctuating flow rates. The resul(cid:173)
`tant boluses and periods of no flow have been associated
`with hemodynamic fluctuations during dopamine infu(cid:173)
`sion in neonates (7). Stiction may also activate pump
`occlusion or run-away alarms and was the reason for the
`recent recall of more than a million syringes (8).
`Commercial syringes are generally made of polypropyl(cid:173)
`ene with an elastomer piston on the end of the syringe
`plunger. The barrel is lubricated with silicone oil to
`reduce the coefficient of friction of the piston, while
`maintaining a seal to prevent solution leakage past the
`piston (9). Plunger movement is determined principally
`by the type and amount of lubricant, the interference or
`squeeze between the piston and barrel, and the amount
`of compression set (deformation) a constrained piston
`takes during sterilization and subsequent storage (10).
`Water washes have been shown to flush a proportion of
`the silicone lubricant from syringes (11) which may
`contribute to the reported syringe stiction problem, but
`the effect of soybean oil emulsion has not been docu(cid:173)
`mented. Syringe performance may also be influenced by
`the way the syringe is used. Syringes may be used after
`being filled and stored in a refrigerator for periods up to
`seven days (up to a month if frozen) particularly for
`
`40
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2005
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`journal.pda.org
`
` on December 3, 2015
`
`patients at home, depending on drug stability, microbial
`quality assurance, convention and supply practicalities
`at the institution (12, 13). Syringes may also be used
`multiple times. For example, one may be used to draw
`up the solvent, inject it into the vial for reconstitution of
`the powder, draw the drug solution out of the vial once
`dissolved, and then to inject the drug solution into the
`patient or infusion device.
`The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on
`syringe performance of syringe use, and the influence of
`water and of soybean oil emulsion when used in the
`syringe. In order to achieve this, the force required for
`syringe plunger motion and the extraction of silicone oil
`from syringes were evaluated.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Syringes
`The following syringe brands and sizes were chosen
`for evaluation: Terumo® 10 mL (Terumo Australia Pty
`Ltd, Melbourne, Australia, B: 2F205), Terumo 50 mL
`(B: 2B626), Talus 10 mL (Livingston, Sydney, Australia,
`B: 23E for extrusion rates and extraction, and B: 18E for
`storage and repeated use) and Primo® 10 mL (Asik,
`Rodby, Denmark, B: 0191019691A18 for syringe plunger
`motion and B: 200289 for silicone oil extraction). Primo
`brand is known as Pharmaplast®, Once®, Steriseal® and
`Ersta® in other countries.
`Primo syringes have a unique plunger piston consist(cid:173)
`ing of a thin ring made of silicone elastomer (Fig. 1)
`designed to minimize contact with the barrel and con(cid:173)
`tents in the syringe. The pistons of Talus, Terumo 10 mL
`and Terumo 50 mL syringes consisted of bromobutyl
`rubber, Santoprene® rubber (Monsanto Polymer Prod-
`
`Figure 1—Photograph of the plunger and piston of a conventional
`syringe (left) and a Primo® brand syringe (right) illustrat(cid:173)
`ing the difference in piston design. The piston of the
`Primo® brand is ring shaped and fits around, rather than
`over the top of the plunger, to reduce the contact area
`with the contents of the syringe.
`
`ucts Co., Akron OH), and an unspecified rubber respec(cid:173)
`tively.
`Approximate quantities of silicone oil (polydimethylsi-
`loxane) claimed to be sprayed into the syringes by the
`manufacturers (personal communication) are Terumo
`50 mL—12 mg, Terumo 10 mL—6 mg, Talus 3.5 mg and
`Primo 2.7 mg. Oil of viscosity 12,500 mm2 s_1 was used
`for the Terumo and Primo brands and 350 mm2 s_1 for
`Talus brand.
`
`Force Required for Syringe Plunger Motion
`
`The force required to initiate and maintain syringe
`plunger motion was measured with an adaptation of the
`methods specified by the Australian Standard (14) and
`Parenteral Drug Association (10). Syringes were tested
`at three speeds using two types of apparatus. The speed
`recommended by the Australian Standard is 50 mm
`min-1 and the others are factors of approximately 20-30
`times slower (as practical according to the equipment
`settings). Nominal speeds were 50, 2.5 and 0.08 mm
`min-1.
`With the apparatus used for testing at 50 mm min-1
`the syringe was stationary and the force gauge (Accu-
`force Cadet 0-90 N, resolution 0.1 N, Ametek, Largo FL,
`U.S.A.) was driven down onto the syringe plunger
`button. In contrast, with the apparatus used for the 2.5
`and 0.08 mm min-1 speeds, the force gauge was station(cid:173)
`ary and the syringe plunger button was driven up against
`the force gauge. The net effect of both apparatus was the
`same, the syringe plunger was driven down the barrel at
`a controlled speed with the force required to do so being
`continuously measured and recorded. When checked in
`triplicate with a stopwatch the actual speeds were found
`to be 47.22 (CV ± 1.38%), 2.53 (CV ± 0.01%) and
`0.079 (CV ± 0.04%) mm min-1. The force gauge was
`calibrated regularly with weights and the error was
`found to be ±0.2 N in the range used. However,
`temperature fluctuations during the prolonged runs at
`the slowest speed, caused drift of zero resulting in errors
`up to ±1.0 N with the 0.08 mm min-1 results.
`At least three new syringes were used for each test.
`When the syringe was filled with liquid, the plunger was
`drawn a minimal distance past the graduated capacity
`line, sufficient only to expel the air. With a new, dry
`syringe the plunger was first fully inserted. The piston
`seal was then aligned with the nominal capacity line,
`except for Talus brand which was tested from the
`graduated capacity line of 12 mL. The syringe was
`positioned vertically in the apparatus with the nozzle
`downwards and supported only by the flange. The
`plunger was straightened in the barrel so that the major
`axes of the plunger, barrel and force gauge were parallel
`to prevent lateral forces or rocking of the piston during
`operation. A fluid collection vessel was positioned under
`the syringe when required, so that the fluid height did
`not reach the syringe nozzle during operation.
`Data from the force gauge were available and re(cid:173)
`corded every 0.6 s by an IBM compatible PC on
`specifically written software. A typical data print-out is
`shown in Figure 2. Information derived from these data
`
`Vol. 50, No. 1 / January-February 1996
`
`41
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2005
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`journal.pda.org
`
` on December 3, 2015
`
`Figure 2—Example of a data printout from a Talus syringe at an extrusion rate of 2.5 mm min- 1, illustrating (A) breakloose force, (B) start of
`average extrusion force, (C) end of average extrusion force, (D) maximum force and (E) piston compressed against end of barrel.
`
`included the breakloose force, average extrusion force,
`and maximum force. The breakloose force is denned as
`the force required to commence movement of the
`plunger, and the extrusion force as that required to
`maintain plunger movement (9, 10). The average extru(cid:173)
`sion force excludes the breakloose force and the sharp
`increase in force at the end when the piston is com(cid:173)
`pressed against the end of the barrel. An average was
`taken of all readings recorded between these exclusions.
`The maximum force is simply the highest force recorded
`during the experiment.
`To establish the effect of extrusion rate, Talus syringes
`were tested at each rate, when used unfilled (i.e., dry),
`and when filled and used immediately with both milli-Q
`water and 10% w/v soybean oil emulsion (Intralipid®,
`KabiVitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden). All other experi(cid:173)
`ments were subsequently performed at 2.5 mm min-1.
`The linear least-squares regression method was used to
`curve fit the data.
`The force required to maintain plunger motion after
`storage filled with water and with soybean oil emulsion
`was compared with the force when filled and used
`immediately. Talus syringes were tested after storage
`filled for one, seven and 91 days prior to use, but Primo
`and Terumo syringes were tested only after storage for
`seven days. Differences were evaluated by analysis of
`variance, and Fisher's protected least significant differ(cid:173)
`ence test for multiple comparisons was used to ascertain
`the origins of any significant (p < 0.05) differences.
`
`The effect of repeated use of syringes was investigated
`by re-using each syringe 12 times when unfilled and also
`immediately after filling. Talus brand was also tested
`after storage filled for 91 days prior to repeated use. The
`linear least-squares regression method was used to curve
`fit the data.
`
`Silicone Oil Extraction from Syringes
`
`Silicone oil extracted from syringes was measured as
`silicon using electrothermal atomization atomic absorp(cid:173)
`tion spectrometry. It was considered the most appropri(cid:173)
`ate method to achieve the low detection limits required
`by this study, with minimal sample handling to avoid
`contamination. Other techniques, notably inductively
`coupled plasma, have silica components that are likely to
`produce relatively high background levels when measur(cid:173)
`ing low concentrations of silicon. The silicone oil concen(cid:173)
`tration was calculated on the basis that silicon is 37.91%
`of the molecular weight of silicone oil of viscosity 12,500
`mm2s"l(9).
`A Varian SpectrAA 40 Zeeman atomic absorption
`spectrometer equipped with an auto sampler and con(cid:173)
`trolled by an Epson PCAX2 computer was used to
`quantify silicon concentrations. Apyrolytic coated graph(cid:173)
`ite tube was used for all measurements. The silicon
`hollow cathode lamp was operated at a current of 10
`mA. Absorbance was measured at 215.6 nm with a slit
`width of 0.2 nm. All absorbances were measured in peak
`
`42
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2005
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`journal.pda.org
`
` on December 3, 2015
`
`height. The furnace was operated in ten steps at tempera(cid:173)
`ture settings from 85 to 2900°C.
`To avoid potential silicon contamination from the
`environment all syringe manipulations were carried out
`in a class 10 horizontal laminar air flow cabinet. All
`equipment was rinsed thoroughly with milli-Q water and
`allowed to dry under the laminar flow cabinet. Non-
`lubricated plastic equipment was used for water and
`soybean oil emulsion to avoid silicon contamination
`from glassware, but glassware was used with carbon
`tetrachloride solutions. Care was taken to avoid the use
`of glassware to store samples and reagents; plasticware
`was used, and the graphite tube was given a number of
`"tube cleans" to remove contaminating silicon from the
`workings of the furnace and establish a suitable base
`line.
`Calibration curves were produced automatically by
`dilution of a 0.1 mcg mL"1 silicon standard solution to
`15 x 10_6L,with5 x 10-6L of palladium modifier plus 5
`or 10 x 10-6 L of standard solution and 5 or 10 x 10-6 L
`of blank solution. The standard solution was prepared
`from a 1 mg mL-1 silicon bulk solution (Alpha Re(cid:173)
`sources Inc., Stevensville, U.S.A.). The palladium modi(cid:173)
`fier was used to improve sensitivity and also to facilitate
`a high ashing temperature (700°C) for the removal of
`interfering matrix species prior to atomization. The
`modifier was a 500 mg mL-1 palladium solution in 1%
`v/v hydrochloric acid, that was prepared from palladium
`metal (Johnson-Matthey, Royston, England) and
`deionised water was used as the blank. Samples of
`soybean oil emulsion were spiked with the silicon calibra(cid:173)
`tion solution to examine the effect of that matrix on the
`atomization of silicon (compared to the aqueous me(cid:173)
`dium). It was revealed that there was no significant
`enhancement or suppression of silicon atomization by
`the soybean oil emulsion matrix under these conditions.
`The silicon concentration measured in the fluids before
`use with the syringes was 182 meg L_1 (SD ± 10) for the
`soybean oil emulsion and 2 meg L_1 (SD ± 0) for water,
`and the limit of detection was 2 meg L-1. Any drift due
`to degradation of the graphite tube was compensated for
`by recalibration after every ten samples. Containers with
`airtight lids were used, and immediately prior to sam(cid:173)
`pling for analysis the sample container was vigorously
`shaken to disperse the silicone oil.
`Three different extractions were performed (three
`syringes of each brand and size were used) with the
`soybean oil emulsion (B: 77934-51) and water:
`1. Flushing—syringes were filled and emptied repeat(cid:173)
`edly with each successive flush being expelled into
`a separate container. Ten flushes were performed
`but not all were analyzed to rationalize the number
`of measurements required.
`2. Storage with occasional agitation—syringes were
`filled, stored for seven days, inverted 180° three
`times for five out of the seven days, and then
`emptied. For both of the above, the syringes were
`filled to the nominal volume mark (care was taken
`not to draw back past this mark to avoid extracting
`
`"extra" silicone lubricant from beyond the mark)
`and inverted 180° three times.
`3. Washing—syringes were washed by shaking vigor(cid:173)
`ously (piston aligned with nominal volume mark)
`with five separate quantities of 1 mL, and the
`washings were pooled for analysis.
`
`In an effort to extract all the silicone oil present, an
`adaptation of a method for extraction from elastomeric
`closures was used (6). Because of the higher concentra(cid:173)
`tions, flame atomic absorption spectrometry was used to
`determine the silicone oil concentration. Three syringes
`of each brand and size were washed five times with 1 mL
`of carbon tetrachloride (AnalaR, BDH Chemicals Ltd,
`Poole, England) and the washings pooled. The carbon
`tetrachloride was evaporated and the residue dissolved
`in methyl iso butyl ketone (MIBK, AR Ajax Chemicals,
`Auburn, Australia). A Varian 475 flame atomic absorp(cid:173)
`tion spectrometer with a nitrous oxide/acetylene flame
`was used. The silicon hollow cathode lamp was operated
`at a current of 10 mA with a slit width of 0.2 nm. A stock
`solution of silicone oil 20 mg mL-1 (12,500 mm2 s_1 Dow
`Corning 200 Silicone Fluid, Dow Corning, Midland MI,
`U.S.A.) in MIBK was used to prepare calibration
`solutions of 0, 5 and 10 mg mL-1. The efficiency of
`silicone oil extraction with carbon tetrachloride wash(cid:173)
`ings was validated by washing 3 syringes to which 3.5 mg
`of silicone oil had been added. Two mL of a 1.75 mg
`mL-1 solution in hexane (AR Ajax Chemicals, Auburn,
`Australia) were instilled and the hexane evaporated
`using a vacuum rotary evaporator with a stream of hot
`air applied to the syringe.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`The effect of extrusion rate upon the force required to
`maintain the plunger motion of Talus syringes, when
`used unfilled, and filled and used immediately with
`soybean oil emulsion and with water, is shown in Figure
`3. The logarithmic and linear curves of best fit to the
`mean data gave similar results, but the logarithmic curve
`is shown for clarity of data presentation. The average
`extrusion force increased as the extrusion rate de(cid:173)
`creased with soybean oil emulsion (r2 0.898), as did the
`maximum force with water (r2 0.593), but both forces
`decreased as the extrusion rate decreased when used
`unfilled (r2 0.948 and 0.643). The coefficient of determi(cid:173)
`nation was less than 0.2 for the average extrusion force
`with water and the maximum force with soybean oil
`emulsion. Since there was no clear relationship with
`extrusion rate, 2.5 mm min-1 was chosen for all subse(cid:173)
`quent experiments because it provided a manageable
`and convenient time interval (20 minutes compared with
`10.4 hours for the 10 mL size at 0.08 mm min-1).
`The effect of the duration of fluid storage in Talus
`brand syringes prior to use is shown in Figure 4. With
`water, the average extrusion force was significantly
`greater after storage filled for one, seven and 91 days
`when compared to filled and used immediately (0 days),
`but there was no difference between the storage periods
`(i.e., one and seven days, one and 91 days, seven and 91
`
`Vol. 50, No. 1 / January-February 1996
`
`43
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2005
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`journal.pda.org
`
` on December 3, 2015
`
`Figure 3—The effect of extrusion rate on the (A) average extrusion
`force and (B) maximum force (mean ± SD) of Talus sy(cid:173)
`ringes (B: 23E) when used unfilled, and immediately after
`filling with water and with soybean oil emulsion. The
`regression line is not shown if r2 < 0.2, i.e., for the
`average extrusion force with water and maximum force
`with soybean oil emulsion, n = three or four, except for
`unfilled at 2.5 mm min- 1, where n = 12. Nominal extru(cid:173)
`sion rates were 50, 2.5 and 0.08 mm min- 1.
`
`Figure 4—The effect of the duration of storage of water, and of
`soybean oil emulsion on the (A) average extrusion force
`and (B) maximum force of Talus syringes (B: 18E) at an
`extrusion rate of 2.5 mm min-1 (mean ± SD, n =12).
`
`days). However, with soybean oil emulsion it increased
`significantly after storage filled for one day, further after
`seven days, and further again after 91 days. The maxi(cid:173)
`mum force increased four-fold after storage filled with
`water or soybean oil emulsion for one day, and by
`approximately a further 50% when stored for seven
`
`days. There was a further significant increase with water
`between seven and 91 days, but there was not significant
`difference with soybean oil emulsion. Since storage filled
`for seven days was sufficient to achieve near maximum
`effect for both the average extrusion and maximum
`forces, and pharmacy dispensed prefilled syringes are
`
`44
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2005
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`journal.pda.org
`
` on December 3, 2015
`
`often stored for this period, it was the time interval
`chosen for investigation of the other brands.
`Storage of soybean oil emulsion for seven days signifi(cid:173)
`cantly increased the average extrusion, maximum and
`breakloose forces of all syringe brands tested (Table I).
`Storage of water significantly increased the breakloose
`force of all syringe brands tested, but only had a
`significant effect on the maximum force of Talus syringes
`and both the average extrusion and maximum forces of
`Terumo 10 mL syringes. The average extrusion and
`maximum forces of Primo brand (which has a silicone
`elastomer piston) was not affected by water storage.
`Repeated use of the syringes increased both the
`average extrusion force and the maximum force, the
`exceptions being Primo when unfilled, and Terumo 10
`mL maximum force with soybean oil emulsion and with
`water (Fig. 5). The increase in force when the syringes
`were not filled is undoubtedly due to mechanical sweep(cid:173)
`ing of the silicone oil lubricant from the barrel as a result
`of piston movement (9,11). If this were the mechanism,
`then both forces would be expected to plateau in a
`logarithmic fashion, as progressively less silicone lubri(cid:173)
`cant was removed with each sweep. The coefficient of
`determination for the curve of best fit to the logarithmic
`mean data supports this hypothesis in most cases (Table
`II). Although the regression line with the Terumo 50 mL
`syringe had a positive gradient and a reasonable coeffi(cid:173)
`cient of determination (except with soybean oil emul(cid:173)
`sion), the forces seemed to peak during repeated use.
`Primo brand had the lowest gradients, showing it was the
`least affected by repeated use. The decrease in force
`with repeated use of Primo when unfilled and Terumo
`10 mL with soybean oil emulsion may have been due to
`spreading of the silicone oil. The latter may also have
`been due to a lubricating effect from the emulsion.
`When Talus brand was stored filled for 13 weeks (91
`days) the maximum force on the initial use was equal to
`
`the breakloose force, and was much greater than on
`subsequent uses (Fig. 6). Except after storage, the
`maximum force usually occurred at some point other
`than at initiation of plunger motion (Table I). It is
`unlikely to be caused by the nature of the fluid since
`both water and soybean oil emulsion gave the same
`result. When the syringes were first removed from their
`package the plunger piston had been in a fixed position
`for some considerable time since manufacture, and
`when moved, an impression of the piston remained on
`the barrel wall. This is probably due to sorption of
`silicone oil from the barrel wall by the elastomer of the
`piston, which is known to occur (9), and seems to explain
`the elevated maximum force, and correspondence with
`the breakloose force, on initial use after storage. Sweep(cid:173)
`ing of silicone oil over the impression would explain why
`the maximum force was not increased with subsequent
`use. The breakloose force of Terumo and Primo syringes
`was also significantly increased after storage of both
`fluids for seven days (Table I), suggesting that the
`elastomers of these brands also sorb silicone oil from the
`barrel wall. An impression of the piston was obvious on
`the barrel of new Terumo syringes after the piston had
`been moved, but not on the Primo syringe.
`The data in Figures 3 and 5 were compared to
`evaluate for differences between the forces when sy(cid:173)
`ringes were used unfilled or filled and used immediately.
`There would seem to be little difference because the
`only statistically significant difference was in the average
`extrusion force data of Talus in Figure 3, when filled and
`used immediately with water.
`The implication of elevated forces required for sy(cid:173)
`ringe function is that the possibility of the piston sticking
`in the barrel is increased. Sticking of the piston in the
`barrel can affect syringe pump function by causing
`fluctuating flow rates, pump alarm activation, and delay
`in the commencement of infusion. Fluctuations in flow
`
`TABLE 1
`Effect of the Storage of Water and of Soybean Oil Emulsion (SBOE) on Syringe Average Extrusion,
`Maximum and Breakloose Forces (N)"
`
`Syringe
`
`FUP-
`
`7 Days
`
`FUI
`
`7 Days
`
`Water
`
`SBOE
`
`(N)
`
`3.1(1.1)
`1.0 (0.4)
`18.2 (4.6)
`15.1 (2.5)
`
`4.8 (1.0)
`1.9 (0.7)
`26.0 (6.0)
`29.6 (8.3)
`
`Average Extrusion Force
`Primo
`Talus
`Terumo 10 mL
`Terumo 50 mL
`Maximum Force (N)
`Primo
`Talus
`Terumo 10 mL
`Terumo 50 mL
`Breakloose Force (N)
`5.5 (0.3)*
`4.3 (1.0)
`Primo
`6.3 (0.5)*
`2.2 (1.0)
`11.5(2.4)*
`1.2 (0.4)
`Talus
`11.1 (2.3)*
`1.6(1.1)
`5.6 (1.8)
`20.5 (3.4)*
`3,2 (1.7)
`Terumo 10 mL
`19.3 (2.6)*
`14.2 (4.6)
`30.9 (0.6)*
`11.7(4.3)
`Terumo 50 mL
`32.4 (4.0)*
`0 Force is presented as the mean and SD (in parenthesis), n = Primo: 4-7, Talus: 12, Terumo 10 mL: 3-7, and Terumo 50 mL: 3.
`b FUI = filled and used immediately.
`c Force beyond gauge capacity (90 N) during operation, for all but one syringe.
`* 7 days different to FUI, p < 0.05.
`
`4.4 (1.1)
`1.6 (0.8)
`26.1 (1.6)*
`14.2(1.1)
`
`5.6 (0.4)
`11.5(2.3)*
`34.3 (2.8)*
`28.1 (0.9)
`
`2.7(1.1)
`1.4 (0.9)
`21.8 (3.2)
`15.5 (3.1)
`
`3.6(1.1)
`2.5 (1.5)
`30.6 (4.5)
`28.6 (8.1)
`
`5.3 (1.8)*
`6.4 (1.0)*
`32.9 (3.7)*
`41.8C
`
`6.3 (0.6)*
`12.5 (2.5)*
`42.5 (4.4)*
`>90c
`
`Vol. 50, No. 1 / January-February 1996
`
`45
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2005
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`journal.pda.org
`
` on December 3, 2015
`
`A : Average Extrusion Force
`
`B: Maximum Force
`
`Trial Number (log scale)
`Figure 5—The effect of repeated use upon the mean (A) average extrusion force and (B) maximum force. Syringes were used 12 times at an
`extrusion rate of 2.5 mm min-1 when unfilled, or filled and used immediately with water or with soybean oil emulsion, n = three,
`except for Talus with water and soybean oil emulsion where n = 12. The regression line is not shown if r2 < 0.2.
`
`rate can have important consequences when potent
`vasoactive drugs with a short duration of action are
`being infused (7). If the occlusion pressure alarm senses
`force from the drive mechanism, rather than pressure
`from the infusion line, then activation of the alarm is
`dependent on the force applied to the syringe plunger.
`The occlusion alarm pressure of syringe pumps surveyed
`
`TABLE II
`Gradient and Coefficient of Determination of the Curve of
`Best Fit to the Logarithmic Mean Force Data for Repeated
`Syringe Use Presented in Figure 5
`
`Syringe Contents Gradient
`
`Gradient
`
`in 1987 (15) ranged from 390 to 1450 mmHg. Many
`pumps now have the option of setting a low occlusion
`alarm pressure, such as 100 mmHg, in an attempt to
`minimize infiltration and ensure rapid response (16).
`When using a 50-mL Terumo syringe, a force of approxi(cid:173)
`mately 9.0 N would be interpreted by the pump to be a
`pressure of 100 mmHg, and could activate the alarm.
`Similarly, a force of approximately 2.6 N with a 10- mL
`syringe would be interpreted as a pressure of 100 mmHg.
`The data in Table I indicate that if the syringes tested
`were used in pumps with occlusion alarms set at 100
`mmHg (and sensing from the drive mechanism), false
`alarms would occur because the syringe forces measured
`exceeded these alarm limits. The occlusion alarm pres(cid:173)
`sure settings necessary to prevent false alarms would be
`563 and 585 mmHg for the Talus and Primo 10-mL
`syringes, respectively (calculated from 15 N), and 1365
`and 385 mmHg for the Terumo 10- and 50-mL syringes,
`respectively (calculated from 35 N). More than a million
`Becton Dickinson brand syringes were recalled recently
`because their high breakloose force was causing false
`alarms with syringe pumps (8). A high breakloose force
`may also delay the commencement of infusion, particu(cid:173)
`larly at low flow rates. To prevent an elevated break-
`loose force causing these problems after storage of
`syringes prefilled, it may be necessary to move the
`syringe plunger prior to putting it into a syringe pump.
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`Unfilled
`Water
`SBOE
`Unfilled
`Water
`SBOE
`
`Unfilled
`Water
`SBOE
`
`Unfilled
`Water
`SBOE
`
`Primo
`
`Talus
`
`Terumo
`10 mL
`
`Terumo
`50 mL
`
`46
`
`Average
`Extrusion Force Maximum Force
`r2
`r2
`0.799
`0.341
`0.934
`0.901
`0.926
`0.934
`
`-0.488
`1.540
`0.672
`4.817
`3.978
`3.033
`
`0.428
`0.952
`0.923
`0.915
`0.907
`0.902
`
`-1.274
`0.522
`3.872
`7.285
`6.177
`3.872
`
`6.640
`1.866
`2.585
`
`19.299
`24.501
`19.440
`
`0.742
`0.175
`0.366
`
`0.844
`0.901
`0.482
`
`9.440
`-0.034
`-2.835
`
`24.388
`32.922
`13.656
`
`0.657
`0
`0.415
`
`0.578
`0.761
`0.101
`
`Fresenius Ex. 2005
`Bass et al. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, IPR2016-00254
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`journal.pda.org
`
` on December 3, 2015
`
`the 50 mL size is greater than 30 N when stored for seven
`days filled with water or soybean oil emulsion.
`The extraction methods were designed to simulate
`conditions encountered in clinical practice. The flushing
`method subjects the syringe to the same agitation
`conditions encountered during routine use, for example
`syringes are flushed twice during recontitution. Ten
`flushes is unlikely to occur in clinical practice but it was
`extended to this number to establish trends. The storage
`method is analogous to conditions that would be encoun(cid:173)
`tered when a patient is dispensed seven days supply at
`once. The three 180° inversions were only gentle agita(cid:173)
`tion, of the type that could be expected during transport
`home, and taking them out of the refrigerator, and
`replacing them, several times during the week. The
`washing method would not be encountered clinically,
`but was performed to establish the level of extraction
`achievable. The quantity of silicone oil recovered by
`carbon tetrachloride washing is compared with the
`quantity claimed to be sprayed into the syringes by the
`manufacturers in Table III. The efficiency of recovery of
`the silicone oil by carbon tetrachloride washing was
`found to be 99.4% (SD ± 45.8).
`Silicone oil was detected in only three of the 20 water
`flushes, and the proportions extract

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket