`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 22
`Entered: July 15, 2016
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`NEPTUNE GENERICS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ELI LILLY & COMPANY
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00240
`Patent 7,772,209 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, and
`TINA E. HULSE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Adam L. Perlman
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00240
`Patent 7,772,209 B2
`
`
`
`
`Having considered Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac
`
`Vice Admission of Mr. Perlman (Paper 20) and its respective declaration in
`
`support (Ex. 2018), it is:
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s unopposed motion for pro hac vice
`
`admission of Mr. Perlman is granted; Mr. Perlman is authorized to represent
`
`Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Perlman is to comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Perlman is to be subject to the
`
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et.
`
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00240
`Patent 7,772,209 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Sarah Spires
`Parvathi Kota
`Skiermont Derby LLP
`240neptune@skiermontderby.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Dov Grossman
`David Krinsky
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`dgrossman@wc.com
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`
`James Leeds
`Eli Lilly & Company
`leeds_james@lilly.com
`
`
`3
`
`