throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 13
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 8,2003
`
`Sheet 1 of 5
`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`140
`
`14d
`
`FIBER NODES
`
`
`
`
`RF AMPLIFIERS
`
`FIG.
`
`1a,
`
`Page2of13
`
`Page 2 of 13
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 8,2003
`
`Sheet 2 of 5
`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`.|E”NRw_LLETmm.
`Ic
`
`\\\\\\\\\\\§\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\MDTl.
`
`mmmw
`
`CT.AI
`
`EVILTA
`
`VIDEO
`SERVER
`
`FIG.
`
`1‘
`
`20
`
`Page 3of13
`
`Page 3 of 13
`
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 8, 2003
`
`Sheet 3 of 5
`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`79 AM-VSB CHANNELS
`
`256~QAM SIGNALS AT 40 Mb/s
`
`55.25 MHZ
`
`547.25 MHz
`
`FREQUENCY
`
`FIG. 2a
`
`SOURCE
`
`2
`
`55
`
`SPECTRUN0
`ANALYZER
`
`‘
`
`20
`
`
`
`
`I
`|
`
`70
`64/256-QAM
`DEMODULATOR
`
`—4——L—4——L—+—4——L—4——L—
`TRIGGER LINE:
`
`— — — —.TRACEl 3- —I—
`
`TRACE A
`“_|‘—T“'I__I——'I‘_“‘|—"T’_‘T_‘l’—
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`CENTER 572.500 IIHZ
`#RES BW 3.0 MHz
`
`fvaw 3 MHz
`
`SPAN 0 Hz
`fswp 1oo ILSEC.
`
`Page4of13
`
`Page 4 of 13
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 8,2003
`
`Sheet 4 of 5
`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`TE-4
`
`‘H
`
`1E—6
`
`1E—7
`
`1E—8
`
`1E-9
`
`1E-10
`
`256-QAM
`CODED BER
`
`SNR=30 as
`cso= 56.8 dBc
`
`QAN CHANNEL FREQUENCY:
`
`
`
`0.3
`
`100
`30
`10
`3
`1
`INTERLEAVER BURST TOLERANCE (I1 3)
`
`300
`
`FIG. 4
`
`CENTER 569.50 MHz
`#RES BW 30 KHz
`
`#VBW 1 KHz
`
`SPAN 10.00 MHZ
`SWP 1.00 SEC
`
`Page 5of13
`
`Page 5 of 13
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 8, 2003
`
`Sheet 5 of 5
`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`1E-4
`
`IE-5
`
`QAM SNR=30dB
`
`256-0AM
`CODED BER ‘E'7
`
`1E—6
`
`1E—8 1E-9
`
` 1E—10
`—65
`-so
`-55
`-50
`
`cso DISTORTION (dBc)
`
`FIG.
`
`6
`
`Page6of13
`
`Page 6 of 13
`
`

`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`1
`METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENHANCING
`DIGITAL VIDEO TRANSMISSION TO A SET-
`TOP BOX
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates generally to a method and
`system for enhancing digital video transrnission to set-top
`boxes in the presence of burst noise and, more particularly,
`to a method for enhancing the performance of multichannel
`systems providing analog and digital programming to
`subscribers, and most particularly, to a method for enhanc-
`ing the performance of multichannel AM-VSB (amplitute
`modulated vestigial sideband)/QAM (quadrature amplitude
`nodulation) video transmission system.
`Video signals sent to set-top boxes of cable TV networks
`are often subject to “burst/impulse noise”, originating from
`3eak Composite-Second-Order (CSO),/Composite-'l‘riple-
`Beat
`(CTB) distortions (CSO/CTB) and/or electrical
`interference, leading to both video “blocking” and visually
`degraded areas in the video picture. Recently, there have
`ween many studies on the performance of 64/256-QAM
`channels (as known to those skilled in the art, “quadrature
`amplitude modulation” is a system which greatly increases
`he amount of information which can be carried within a
`given bandwidth; the technique is essentially a combination
`of phase and amplitude modulation, where, for example,
`64-QAM has 8 amplitude states and 8 phase states) in the
`aresence of nonlinear distortions in hybrid analog/digital
`(e.g., AM/QAM) video transmission systems. Most of these
`studies have analyzed the effect of clipping distortion on the
`3it-error-rate (BER) of a QAM channel using CW carriers
`from a multitonc gcncrator. However, a method of climi-
`iating the negative effect of bursty CS0 and CTB
`distortions, on the bit-error-rate (BER) of the QAM channel
`using modulated video carriers, has not been determined.
`In fact, the problems associated with burst noise gener-
`ated errors have been addressed only by using a convolu-
`tional interleaver as part of the error-correction scheme in a
`quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) modem or
`receiver. In particular, a convolutional interleaver may be
`inserted between the channel encoder and the channel and is
`
`typically characterized by the number of shift registers,
`which is also called the “depth” I (symbols), and by the
`symbol delay increment per register J. Due to memory cost
`and end-to-end delay for the transmitted symbols, in certain
`applications it is advantageous to limit the interleaver (I, J)
`values.
`
`More specifically, robust transmission of 64/256-QAM
`channels over current hybrid fiber/coax cable TV networks
`is achieved with the use of a forward—error—correction (FEC)
`scheme in the QAM modem or receiver. For some digital
`video broadcast (DVB) applications, the FEC scheme con-
`sists of a FEC code, such as Reed-Solomon (R-S) T=8
`(204,188) code, a convolutional interleaver, and a random-
`izer. Interleaving the R-S symbols before transmission, and
`deinterleaving after reception, evenly disperses the burst
`crrors in time, thus cnabling thc burst crrors to bc corrected
`by the FEC in the QAM modem or receiver as if the errors
`were randomly distributed.
`in the article entitled
`As described in greater detail
`“Realization of Optimum Interleavers”, by John L. Ramsey
`(Ramsey, J. L., ‘“‘Realization of Optimum Interleavers”,
`IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, IT16, 338-345 (1970)), an inter-
`leaver redistributes the channel symbols such that the sym-
`bols from a codeword are mutually separated by somewhat
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`thus
`more than the length of a typical burst of errors,
`effectively making the channel appear to the decoder as a
`random-error channel. Ramsey further describes four real-
`izations of interleavers that reorder a sequence of symbols
`such that no contiguous sequence of n2 symbols in the
`reordered sequence, contains any pair of symbols that were
`separated by fewer than n, symbols in the original ordering.
`Although the R-S code in the QAM modem cannot
`correct generated CSO/CTB burst errors without an
`interleaver, implementation using a larger interleaver in the
`modem or receiver, to address the problems associated with
`burst noise-generated errors, greatly increases the cost and
`thus, by itself, may not provide the optimal solution.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention is therefore directed to the problem
`of reducing the effect of CSO/CTB distortions and burst/
`impulse noise on a transmitted digital signals, such as a
`QAM channel over a cable TV network.
`In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a method to
`improve the performance of a hybrid analog and digital
`video transmission system selects a digital channel map
`based on the relative magnitude and frequency locations of
`nonlinear distortions and thc analog channcl frcqucncy plan.
`In a particular embodiment of the invention, the hybrid
`analog and digital is a multichannel AM-VSB/QAM video
`transmission system. And the digital channel map is selected
`based on the relative magnitude and frequency locations of
`CS0 and CTB distortions and based on the analog channel
`frcqucncy plan. In one particular embodiment, thc rclativc
`magnitude and frequency locations of CS0 and CTB dis-
`tortions are determined based on a type of laser transmitter
`in the video lightwave transmission system, which can be
`either a Directly Modulated (DM) laser transmitter or an
`Externally Modulated (EM) laser transmitter.
`In yet a further embodiment,
`the digital channel map
`selected downshifts each QAM channel center frequency to
`reduce the CS0 and CTB distortions.
`In yet a further
`embodiment,
`the selected digital channel map is down-
`loaded to the set-top box.
`In another aspect of the invention, the determination of
`analog frequency plan indicates a harmonic related carrier
`(HRC) channel frequency plan or an interval related carrier
`(IRC) channel frequency plan. If the HRC plan is indicated,
`in accordance with one embodiment, the digital channel map
`selected downshifts each QAM channel center frequency by
`3-MHz relative to the picture carrier frequency. If the IRC
`plan is implemented, again in accordance with one
`embodiment, when the CS0 distortions are dominant, the
`digital channel map selected downshifts each QAM channel
`center frequency by 1.75 -MHz relative to the picture carrier
`frequency; while when the CTB distortions are dominant,
`the digital channel map selected downshifts each QAM
`channel center frequency by 3-MHz relative to the picture
`carricr frcqucncy.
`In yet a further embodiment of the invention, a QAM
`modem in the video transmission system includes an
`interleaver, which may be variable, and the depth of the
`variable interleaver may be adjusted based on the CS0 and
`CTB distortions.
`
`In still a further embodiment of the invention, the he adend
`of a hybrid analog and digital video transmission system, for
`enhancing digital video transmission, includes generating
`means, for generating a composite analog, digital and/or
`data signal, and transferring means, for transferring the
`generated signal. In the system,
`the transferring means
`
`Page7of13
`
`Page 7 of 13
`
`

`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`3
`determines the relative magnitude and frequency locations
`of nonlinear distortions, identifies the analog channel fre-
`quency plan, and selects a digital channel map based on the
`determination and identification.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1(a) shows the architecture of a conventional Hybrid
`Fiber/Coax (HFC) cable system; FIG. 1(b) shows the archi-
`ture of a conventional Fiber To The Curb (FTTC) cable
`system.
`FIG. 2(a) shows the channel plan implemented for an
`experimental simulation, FIG. 2(b) illustrates an experimen-
`tal simulation hybrid multichannel AM—VSB/256 QAM
`video transmission system used to test the principles of the
`present invention.
`FIG. 3 shows traces of the average (trace A) and the peak
`(trace B) CSO distortions at 572.5-MHZ from the experi-
`mental simulation setup of FIG. 2.
`FIG. 4 illustrates the measured BER versus the maximum
`interleaver burst tolerance, with and without QAM channel
`frequency offset from the experimental simulation setup of
`FIG. 2.
`
`FIG. 5 shows the RF frequency spectrum, with a bandpass
`filter and without a bandpass filter, where the dominant CSO
`distortions are outside the shifted 569.5 -MHZ 256-QAM
`channel band, illustrating the principles of the present inven-
`tion.
`
`FIG. 6 illustrates the measured 256-QAM Coded BER
`versus the average CSO distortion for (A) no interleaver; (B)
`I=68, J=3 interleaver and (C) I=204, J=1 interleaver, each
`with the QAM channel center frequency downshifted
`3-MHZ,
`in accordance with the principles of the present
`invention, to 569.5-MIIZ.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`Various braodband network architectures may be used to
`deliver analog/digital video, analog/digital audio, and high
`speed data to cable subcribers. The network architectures
`primarily implemented in the United States are the “Hybrid
`Fiber/Coax (_HFC)” network,
`the “Fiber To The Curb
`(FTTC)” network and the “Fiber To The Home (FTTH)”
`network.
`The conventional HFC architecture is illustrated in FIG.
`
`1(a). As shown, the signals from the master headend 10 to
`the primary (12a, 12b and 12c) and the secondary (1451, 14b,
`14c and 14d) hubs are transmitted over single-mode fiber
`(SMF) using, for example, 1550-nm externally modulated
`(EM) DFB laser transmitters. The composite signal may be,
`for example, a mixture of traditional broadcast analog sig-
`nals with MPEG compressed digital video. At the primary
`and secondary hubs, which may house Synchronous Optical
`Network (SONET) equipment as well as modems, routers,
`and servers for high-speed data, the optical signals may be
`converted to RF signals and then back to optical signals for
`transmission to various fiber nodes (16a, 16b, 16c and 16a)
`using, for example, 1310-mn DFB laser transmitters.
`The coaxial portion of the network architecture illustrated
`in FIG. 1(a), consists of for example, RF amplifiers, taps,
`and coaxial cables, and spans from each fiber node (16a—a)
`to the corresponding subscriber’s home(s), where the digital
`set-top box is placed.
`FIG. 1(b) illustrates a conventional architecture for a
`Fiber-To-The-Curb (FTTC) Network.
`In this network,
`broadcasted analog video signals, interactive digital video
`signals, and high-speed data are transmitted over single-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`mode fiber (SMF) network to a switched digital access
`system 10, which may be located at a central oflice (C0) of
`a telephone company or a headend of a cable TV company.
`The switched access system may be also connected to public
`switched telephone network 20, as shown in FIG. 1(b). The
`combined signal, which consists of video, data, and tele-
`phony signals, is then transmitted via a SMF to a Broadband
`Network Interface 30 11 nit (BNI), which is typically located,
`for example, in the vicinity of a small serving area (20-50
`homes). The BNI may be connected to the Broadband
`Gateway Interface 40 unit (BGI) at the side of the home via
`coaxial cable or twisted cooper wire. The BGI unit distrib-
`utes the video, telephony, and data signals to the appropriate
`information devices as shown in FIG. 1(b). In the Fiber-To-
`The-Home (FTTH) architecture, although not specifically
`illustrated in FIG. 1, the BGI is simply replaced with the
`BN1; and thus the fiber continues to the home rather than
`“the curb”.
`
`While each of the above described architectures vary
`considerably, the inventive concepts described herein are
`applicable to any of the multiple cable system architectures,
`including the HFC system, the FTTC system, and the FTTH
`system, described above.
`For illustrative purposes, an AM-VSB/256-QAM video
`transmission system will specifically be described and dis-
`cussed. However, one skilled in the art will recognize the
`specific embodiments described herein are illustrative pre-
`ferred embodiments, and that, for example,
`the “QAM”
`system could in fact be any known modulation system,
`including QPSK for example.
`In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present
`invention,
`the effect of burst/impulse noise on a QAM
`channel is significantly reduced by carefully selecting the
`QAM channel frequency plan based on the relative magni-
`tude and frequency locations of the CS0 and CTB distor-
`tions and on the analog channel frequency plan utilized by
`the system.
`First, the relative magnitude of the CS0 distortions as
`compared with the CTB distortions can be determined by the
`particular type of laser transmitter and receiver used by the
`cable operators. Specifically, the relative magnitude of the
`distortions depends on whether the laser transmitter
`is
`Directly Modulated (DM) or Externally Modulated (EM)
`and the type of pre-distortion circuitry. For downstream
`transmission, three types of laser transmitters are typically
`used:
`(1) a 1310-nm DM-DFB laser transmitter,
`(2) a
`1550-nm EM-DFB laser transmitter, and (3) a 1319-nm EM
`YAG laser transmitter. The CSO distortions are typically the
`dominant distortions in the QAM channel when using a
`1310-nm DM-DFB laser transmitter. However,
`the CTB
`distortions are typically the dominant distortions when using
`a 1550-nm EM-DFB laser transmitter. In order to reduce
`equipment cost, cable operators are likely to use either a
`1310-nm DM-DFB laser transmitter or a 1550-nm EM-DFB
`
`lascr transmittcr over a given local network from a single
`vendor. Thus, a determination of which distortions, i.e., the
`CS0 or CTB distortions, are dominant in the QAM channels
`may be made based on the type of laser transmitter.
`In addition, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of
`the invention, the type of cable TV frequency plan utilized
`must be determined. The two most widely used cable TV
`frequency plans are the HRC, harmonically related carrier
`plan, and the IRC, incrementally related carrier plan. In the
`IIRC frequency plan, the picture carrier frequencies in the
`different cable channels are forced to have a strictly propor-
`tional and phase-locked relationship, thereby concentrating
`
`Page8of13
`
`Page 8 of 13
`
`

`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`5
`the distortions at the carrier frequencies. In the HRC system
`the picture carrier frequencies are downshifted 1.25-MHz,
`compared with the corresponding picture carriers in the IRC
`plan. One advantage of the HRC plan is that the CS0 and
`CTB distortion products fall on the picture carrier
`frequencies, and thus, their affect is less disturbing and if
`fact, becomes almost invisible. However, some converters
`and TV sets are incompatible and cannot detune to the new
`carrier frequencies.
`the first picture carrier frequency is
`In the IRC plan,
`located at 55.2625-MHz with successive picture carriers
`located at 6-MHz apart, up to 1-GHz. The IRC plan elimi-
`nates the detuning problem, however, the CS0 distortions
`are located at 11.25-MHz from the corresponding picture
`carrier frequency, and thus can become visible.
`If the IRC plan is used, and the dominant distorions are
`the CS0 distortions, each QAM channel center frequency
`will be downshifted by 1.75-MHz relative to the picture
`carrier frequency. If however, the dominant distorions are
`the CTB distortions, each QAM channel center frequency
`will be downshifted by 3-MHz relative to the picture carrier
`frequency.
`If the HRC plan is used, each QAM channel center
`frequency will be downshifted by 3-MHz relative to the
`picture carrier frequency regardless of whether the dominant
`distortions are the CS0 or CTB distortions.
`
`In one particular method of providing an offset to the
`QAM carrier frequency, implemented by the assignee Gen-
`eral Instrument, a full frequency plan table is constructed
`from one or more Carrier Definition Table (CDT) structures,
`each defining a starting frequency, number of carriers, and
`frequency spacing for carriers in the group. The specified
`carrier represents the nominal band for all modulation
`methods including AM and QAM. The CDT and a Virtual
`Channel Table (VCT) are broadcasted from the headend, to
`the set-top box at the subscriber, through an Out-Of-Band
`(OOB) channel. The VCT informs the set-top box if the
`tuned channel is MPEG-2, the type of modulation mode
`(QAM or AM), the full frequency plan using the CDT, and
`other parameters.
`the bursty behaviors of the CS0
`As noted above,
`distortions, which are produced by the modulated analog
`video signals at the directly modulated laser transmitter
`(e.g., 1310-nm DM-DFB), are responsible for the Bit-Error-
`Rate (BER) degradation of the 256-QAM channel.
`However, as described in further detail below, in addition to
`offsetting the frequency of the QAM channel relative to the
`dominant distortions,
`in a preferred embodiment of the
`invention, the interleaver depth in a QAM modem may also
`be adjusted so as to combat burst-errors generated by
`time—varying CSO distortions in a hybrid multichannel
`AM-VSB (amplitude modulated vestigial-sideband)/256-
`QAM video lightwave transmission system. In particular, in
`the experimental simulation setup described below, when an
`I=204, J=1 interleaver was used together with QAM channel
`frequency offset with respect
`to the dominant CSO
`distortions,
`the 256-QAM coded bit-error-rate BER was
`rcduccd by more than 500 times as compared with thc case
`where QAM frequency offset was implemented but no
`interleaver was utilized, even in the presence of large CSO
`distortion levels (>—60—dBc).
`Finally, an additional aspect of the invention further
`reduces the CSO/CTB distortions to the cable plant by
`providing a switch, outside the AGC circuitry, which lowers
`the operating point by 3.0-3.4-dB by switching between
`continuous wave (CW) carriers and analog video signals. In
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`the AM CNR and
`in the proposed method,
`particular,
`CSO/CTB distortions are measured with modulated
`AM-VSB video signals and 0-dBm optical power at the fiber
`node receiver. The average RF input
`level
`to the laser
`transmitter, outside the AGC circuitry, is then reduced by
`approximately 3.4-dB and the AM CNR and CSO/CTB
`distortions are once again measured. The results then rep-
`resent an “optimum” operating point for the laser transmitter
`when using modulated video signals.
`FIG. 2(b) provides an experimental simulation setup, of a
`hybrid multichannel AM-VSB/256-QAM video lightwave
`transmission system,
`that was used to test tl1e proposed
`method. As shown in the channel plan of FIG. 2(a), the
`channel plan for the simulated system consisted of seventy-
`nine AM-VSB (amplitude modulated vestigial sideband)
`broadcast TV video channels 10, from a cable TV headend,
`which were combined with two 256-QAM digital channels
`(MPEG sources 20 and 24, and QAM modulators 22 and
`26), operating at 40.5 Mb/s (for compressed digital video
`and high speed data services) at a RF frequency of 571.25-
`MHz and 643.25—MHz,
`to directly—modulate a 1310—nm
`DFB laser transmitter 40. Once again it is noted that the
`channel plan shown in FIG. 2(a) was used for a simulation
`and is exemplary only and could in fact consist of any analog
`and/or digital requirements including digital audio.
`A broadband white Gaussian noise source 30 was also
`used in the QAM link for BER-SNR measurements. After
`transmission through 10.6-km of a standard single-mode-
`fiber, the combined signal was detected at 0-dBm received
`optical power at the cable TV receiver 50. The CNR, CTB
`and CS0 of the AM band were measured on a spectrum
`analyzer 60. The 256-QAM signals were down-converted to
`IF frequency, demodulated by 64/256-QAM demodulator
`70, and then fed to an error-detector 80. The peak modulated
`video power to the average QAM channel power ratio was
`5.6 dB.
`The measured AM-VSB CNR at the cable TV receiver
`
`was 51.8 dB with an average CSO distortion of -56.8-dBc
`and CTB distortion of -60-dBc in the 256-QAM band. As
`expected, tl1e CSO distortion at 572.5-MHz was the domi-
`nant non-linear distortion in the QAM channel band. The
`1310-nm DFB laser transmitter was operating at AM modu-
`lation index of 3.5% per channel with a clipping index
`y=4-10‘4.
`FIG. 3 shows typical 100-ys time-traces of the average
`(trace A) and the peak (trace B) CSO distortion at 572.5-
`MHz on a spectrum analyzer (SA) in a zero span mode. The
`SA trigger was setup to start the sweep for any event of the
`peak CSO distortion, which is above the solid line. The line
`represents the threshold level for impulses with higher
`amplitudes that would degrade the coded BER.
`The observed bursty behavior of the CS0 distortion,
`which has a non-Gaussian statistics, can be explained by the
`fact
`that
`the peak envelope power of modulated video
`signals (unlike CW carriers) can vary by as much as 18-dB,
`depending on the picture content. Specifically, the synchro-
`nization pulses of the modulated video signals may tempo-
`rarily align with cach othcr, causing thc corrcsponding vidco
`carriers to be at their maximum power at the same time,
`resulting in increased CSO/CTB distortions. Thus, the use of
`CW carriers to simulate modulated video carriers does not
`
`accurately represent the time-dependence of the peak CSO/
`CTB distortions.
`
`the use of CW carriers from a multitone
`In addition,
`generator to simulate modulated video carriers also affects
`the laser clipping distortion. In particular,
`the Automatic
`
`Page9of13
`
`Page 9 of 13
`
`

`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`7
`Gain Control (AGC) circuitry in the directly modulated
`(DM) DFB laser transmitter maintains the average RF input
`power at a fixed level. Under these conditions, when CW’
`carriers are used, the AGC circuitry reduces the AM modu-
`lation index by a factor of \/[3, and the CNR is lowered by
`a factor of [3 (approximately 3.4-dB), as compared with
`using modulatcd vidco carricrs, resulting in rcduccd CSO/
`CTB distortions.
`
`In order to combat the generated burst errors, a variable
`interleaver in the QAM modern, with depth I up to 204
`symbols, and J=204,T symbols, was used with R-S T=8
`(204,188) code. The maximum burst length that can be
`corrected by the variable interleaver and deinterleaver com-
`bination is given by:
`
`N.’
`_(J-1-+1)-T_|1—
`Rs
`
`(1)
`
`where I and J are the interleaver parameters, N=204 symbols
`is the R-S block size, R5=5.056 Mbaud is the transmitted
`symbol rate, and T=8 symbols.
`FIG. 4 shows the mcasurcd 256-QAM codcd BER versus
`the maximum interleaver burst tolerance ‘U (us) for QAM
`channel center frequencies of 571.25-MHZ (solid line) and
`569.5—MHz (dotted line). The 256-QAM SNR was set to
`30-dB, corresponding to a coded BER of 1.5~10‘9 with no
`AM-VSB channel loading (CSO=—56.8 dBc). Since the
`interleaver was used with I~J=204 symbols,
`increasing I
`according to the above equation results in increasing the
`burst tolerance as shown in FIG. 4. For an I=204, J=1
`interleaver, a nearly four times reduction in the 256-QAM
`BER was obtained by the QAM channel frequency offset
`alone.
`
`As illustrated in FIG. 4, at a burst duration of 30-ys, the
`256-QAM coded BER slowly decreases as the interleaver
`depth is increased since the average burst length is larger
`than the maximum burst tolerance of the interleaver and
`deinterleaver combination. However, as the maximum inter-
`leaver burst tolerance becomes significantly larger than a
`burst duration of about 30-us (~3X), most of the generated
`burst errors are effectively corrected by the interleaver,
`resulting in a steeper reduction in the coded BER. In fact, the
`256-QAM coded BER was reduced by two orders of mag-
`nitude in comparison to the “BER without implementation
`of an interleaver” case.
`
`The results illustrated in FIG. 4 also indicate that using an
`I=68, J=3 interleaver with QAM channel frequency offset
`will provide the same coded BER as a three times longer
`interleaver (I=204, J=1) without QAM channel frequency
`offset. From implementation cost point of view, it can be
`significantly less expensive to keep the depth and the symbol
`delay (I, J) of the convolutional interleaver as short as
`possible, as it requires the addition of Static Random Access
`Memory (SRAM) in the QAM receiver.
`In addition, by shifting the QAM channel center fre-
`quency down to 569.5 -MHZ, FIG. 5 shows that the dominant
`CSO distortions at 572.5-MHZ and at 566.5-MHZ (trace 2)
`are now located outside the downshifted QAM channel
`band. The other nonlinear distortions in the downshifted
`
`QAM band, namely, the CS0 distortion at 570-MHz and the
`CTB distortion at 571.25-MHZ, have smaller magnitudes
`relative to the QAM carrier. If the CTB distortion becomes
`the dominant distortion in the QAM band, then a 3-MHZ
`downshift of the QAM channel frequency to 5 68.25 -MHZ is
`required to improve the 256-QAM coded BER.
`Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the proposed
`fixed QAM channel frequency offset method can also be
`
`8
`applied to multiple contiguous digital (e.g., QAM) channels,
`where the dominant non-linear (e.g., CSO or CTB) distor-
`tions will fall in, the small gaps between the digital channels.
`Finally, FIG. 6 provides an illustration which indicates
`that an I=204, J=1 interleaver in a QAM receiver will also
`work as well at higher CSO distortion levels. To obtain the
`mcasurcmcnts illustrated in FIG. 6,
`the AM modulation
`index per channel at the laser transmitter was changed while
`keeping the power ratio between the QAM and the AM-VSB
`channels constant. Specifically, FIG. 6 shows the measured
`256-QAM coded BER, with the QAM channel at 571.25-
`MHZ, versus the average CSO distortion at a frequency of
`572.5-MI-I7 for (A) no interleaver, (B) I=68, J=3 interleaver,
`and (C) downshiftcd QAM channel to 569.5-MHZ with 30
`dB SNR and I=204, J=1 interleaver. The I=68, J=3 inter-
`leaver (trace B) works best at CSO distortion levels less than
`—60—dBc. At higher CSO distortion levels however, the I=68,
`J=3 interleaver is overwhelmed with burst errors, resulting
`in a BER performance that approaches the no interleaver
`case. As illustrated by trace C, the I=204, J=1 interleaver,
`together with tl1e QAM channel frequency offset method,
`provides robust transmission, even in the presence of large
`CSO distortions (2-55 dBc).
`As is clcarly shown, by frcqucncy offsctting a QAM
`channel relative to the dominant bursty CSO distortions, and
`implementing a variable interleaver (i.e., in this case, an
`I=204 J=1 interleaver), nearly error—free transmission was
`achieved, even in the presence of large CSO distortions
`(>—55-dBc) in a hybrid AM-VSB/256-QAM video light-
`wave transmission system. Accordingly, based on (1) the
`magnitude and frequency locations of the CS0 and CTB
`distortions in the cable TV network and on (2) the analog
`channel frequency plan, the selection of the proper inter-
`leaver depth as well as the proper shifting of QAM channel
`frequency plan may be made.
`Applicant notes that while the detailed description of the
`invention corresponding to FIGS. 2-6 is related only to a
`preferred embodiment of a multichannel AM-VSB/256
`QAM video lightwave transmission system, several different
`transmission systems are used internationally, and the inven-
`tive concepts described herein are equally applicable to all
`hybrid analog/digital video transmission systems.
`In addition, it will be appreciated that modifications and
`variations of the present invention are covered by the above
`teachings and within the purview of the appended claims
`without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the
`invention.
`What is claimed is:
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`1. Amethod to improve the performance of hybrid analog
`and digital video transmission systems comprising the step
`of:
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`determining the relative magnitude and frequency loca-
`tions of nonlinear distortions;
`identifying an analog channel frequency plan used in said
`transmission system; and
`selecting a digital channel r11ap based on said determining
`step and said identifying step,
`wherein a frequency band of a first digital channel is
`selected in said selecting step such that dominant linear
`distortions fall outside said frequency band.
`2. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the
`method is applied to multiple contiguous digital channels,
`and wherein the nonlinear distortions fall in gaps between
`the multiple contiguous digital channels.
`3. A method in accordance with claim 1, further compris-
`ing the step of downloading the selected digital channel map
`to the set-top box.
`
`Page10of13
`
`Page 10 of 13
`
`

`
`US 6,546,557 B1
`
`9
`4. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the
`digital channel map selected in said selecting step down-
`shifts each channel center frequency to reduce the nonlinear
`distortions.
`5. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the
`hybrid analog and digital video transmission system is a
`multichannel AM-VSB/QAM system.
`6. A method in accordance with claim 5, wherein the
`nonlinear distortions determined in said determining step are
`CS0 and CTB distortions.
`7. A method in accordance with claim 6, wherein the
`digital channel map selected in said selecting step down-
`shifts each QAM channel center frequency to reduce the
`magnitude of the CS0 and CTB distortions.
`8. A method in accordance with claim 6, wherein said
`determining step determines the relative magnitude and
`frequency locations of CS0 and CTB distortions based on a
`type of laser transmitter in the video transmission system.
`9. A method in accordance with claim 8, wherein the laser
`transmitter of the video transmission system is a Directly
`Modulated (DM) laser transmitter.
`10. A method in accordance with claim 8, wherein the
`laser transmitter of the video transmission system is an
`Externally Modulated (EM) laser transmitter.
`11. A method according to claim 5, wherein a QAM
`modem in said video transmission system includes an inter-
`leaver.
`12. Amethod according to claim 11, wherein the depth of
`the interleaver is variable.
`
`13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the depth of
`the interleaver may be adjusted based on the CS0 and CTB
`distortions determined in said determining step.
`14. A method according to claim 12, wherein increasing
`the depth of the interleaver reduces the magnitude of the
`CS0 and CTB distortions.
`15. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
`identifying step identifies a harmonic related carrier (HRC)
`channel frequency plan.
`16. A method in accordance with claim 15, wherein the
`digital channel map selected downshifts each QAM channel
`center frequency by 3-MHZ relative to the picture carrier
`frequency.
`17. A method in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
`identifying step identifies an interval related carrier (IRC)
`channel frequency plan.
`18. A method in accordance with claim 17, wherein when
`said determining step determines that the CS0 distortions
`are dominant, the digital channel map selected downshifts
`each QAM channel center frequency by 1.75-MHz relative
`to the picture carrier frequency.
`19. A method in accordance with claim 17, wherein when
`said determining step determines that the CTB distortions
`are dominant, the digital channel map selected downshifts
`each QAM channel center frequency by 3-MHZ relative to
`the picture carrier frequency.
`20. A method according to claim 1, wherein continuous
`wave (CW) carriers are used to simulate modulated video
`carriers.
`
`21. A method according to claim 20, wherein Automatic
`Gain Circuitry (AGC) maintains an average RF input power
`at a fixed level.
`
`22. A method according to claim 21, wherein a laser
`transmitter of the video lightwave transmission system is a
`Directly Modulated (DM) laser tran

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket