throbber
MW, 1923
`
`AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION
`
`229
`
`THE BIOLOGIC STANDARDIZATION OF LOCAL ANAESTHETICS.
`WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO EFFECT on STERILIZATION ON SOLUTIONS OF COCAINE
`AND PROCAINE.
`
`(Continuation of a Previously Reported Paper.1)
`BY PAUL S. PITTENGER.
`
`In a paper1 read before this section last year, the author described a biologic
`method for the quantitative valuation of local anaesthetics.
`It was shown that
`the method described was sensitive to a variation of 1 mg. of cocaine and to 5 mg.
`of procaine.
`The sensitiveness of the method suggested its adaptability for checking the
`effect of aging and the various forms of sterilization upon solutions of cocaine and
`procaine. Accordingly, a series of experiments were started as follows:
`
`First.——Prepare a solution of "cocaine and one of procaine of such strength that 1 cc will
`contain the minimum amount of salt that will produce local anaesthesia in 5 minutes when tested
`by the foregoing method, reserving a sample of each of the salts used.
`Cocaine 0.6% solution
`
`} based on Experiments Nos. 1 and 2.1
`
`Procaine 7.0% solution
`Second.—Divide each solution into four portions, fill each portion into ampuls as follows:
`(/1) Fill into sterile ampuls without sterilizing or Berkfeldting.
`(B) Add 0.3% Three Cresols, Berkfeldt and fill into sterile ampuls.
`(C) Fill into ampuls and Arnold—sterilize on three consecutive days.
`(D) Fill into ampuls and autoclave for 15 min. at 115° C.
`TIzird.—-Test each lot to determine effect of sterilization.
`
`Fourth.——Test each lot every three months to determine rate of deterioration on standing.
`Fij'th.—At the end of six months make fresh solutions of the reserve salts and test to de-
`termine whether or not the salt deteriorates with age.
`
`The results of the 18 experiments reported last year showed that the amount
`of solution of cocaine or procaine required to produce complete anaesthesia was
`exactly the same before and after the different forms of sterilization, thus indicating
`that sterilization does not aflect the activity of solutions of cocaine or procaine.
`It was also shown that the unsterilized solutions, the solutions sterilized with
`heat, and the solutions sterilized without heat, all possessed exactly the same
`activity after 3 months as immediately after being prepared.
`Each lot of solution has again been tested 14 months after filling and sterilizing.
`results of this final test on each lot as compared with the two previous tests
`
`;Fl]l€
`
`0 lows:
`
`Experiments Nos. 3, 4 and 19.
`
`COCAINE SOLUTION 0.6%.
`Filled into sterile ampuls without sterilizing or Berkfeldting.
`
`Dose.
`0 .7
`0 -8
`
`1-6
`1
`1 -1
`~
`
`.
`
`Imme(i3i:i)£et:ly1\ai(f)te:1;;"fi1ling
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`.
`Sensitive.
`*Not sensitive
`*Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`.
`
`Results.
`3 !.'I1:CE):Sxpaii:t§IT'of:ll‘l1l.I]g'
`.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Very slightly sensitive
`*Not sensitive
`*Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`‘
`
`g_
`
`14 11ili(s»pt'aIf\i:'r 1%-llin
`,
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`' Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`*Not sensitive.
`
` O
`
`1 “The Biologic Standardization of Local Anaesthetics,” JOUR. A. PI-I. A., Vol. X, No, 10,
`ctober 1921.
`
`MYLAN ET AL. - EXHIBIT 1015
`
`MYLAN ET AL. - EXHIBIT 1015
`
`

`
`230
`
`JOURNAL on THE
`
`Vol. xn. No.3
`
`Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc
`for both Experiments Nos. 3 and 4, and 1-1 CC for EXPe1'iment N0‘ 19-
`
`Experiments Nos. 5, 6 and 20.
`
`T'/
`PROCAINE SOLUTIONS 7‘/O.
`_
`Filled into sterile ampuls without sterilizing or Berkfeldting.
`Results.
`
`Dose_
`0 8
`0.9
`0_g
`*1 _0
`as] 0
`1
`1
`
`.
`. N . 5.
`Expt. No. 6._
`Expt. No. 20.
`_
`1
`Immegigifily aiitcr filling.
`3 mos. after filling.
`14 mos. ‘after
`filling.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Slightly sensitive
`5'i‘T15ftfV‘3
`Sensftfve
`Slightly sensitive
`.
`Sensitive.
`.
`Sensitive.
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc
`for Experiments Nos. 5, 6 and 20.
`
`Experiments Nos. 7, 8 and 21.
`
`(
`COCAINE SOLUTION 0.6 (1,.
`
`0.3% Three Cresols, Berkfeldted and filled into sterile ampuls.
`Results.
`
`Dose,
`0 .8
`0.9
`0 ,9
`
`1 .0
`
`1 _0
`I .1
`
`Immegliftteléqgitzi filling.
`Sensitive
`Very slightly sensitive
`Sensitive
`
`*Not sensitive
`
`*Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`3 mgifirgrosfiing.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Slightly sensitive
`
`*Not sensitive
`
`*Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`14 n§§.)t'a1ii:i ziilling.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`
`Sensitive
`
`Slightly sensitive
`*Not sensitive
`
`Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc
`for both Experiments Nos. '7 and 8, and 1.1 cc for Experiment No. 21.
`
`Experiments Nos. 9, 10 and 22.
`
`PROCAINE SOLUTION 7%.
`
`0.3% Three Cresols, Berkfeldted and filled into sterile ampuls.
`
`Results.
`
`,
`
`Expt. No. 9.
`Immediately after filling.
`
`Expt. No. 10.
`3 mos. after filling.
`
`_
`Expt. No. 22.
`14 mos. after
`filling.
`
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not Sensitive
`N01 S€I1SitiV€
`
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`Dosc.-
`
`0 .8
`0 .9
`0 . 9
`*1 .0
`*1 .0
`1 -1
`
`Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 CC
`for Experiments Nos. 9, 10 and 22.
`
`Experiments Nos. 11, 12 and 23.
`
`COCAINE SoLULioN i().6€’('_,
`Filled into ampuls and Arnold—sterilized on 3 consecutive days.
`Results.
`E t_ N 12
`3 mg: afte(i‘ifilli'ng.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`
`14
`
`t N _ 23,
`15:5‘? iaftgr
`filling.
`Sensitive
`’ Sensitive
`
`_
`l)ose.
`0 .8
`0 .9
`
`E_Xpt. NO. 11.
`Immediately after filling.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`
`

`
`March 1923
`
`AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION
`
`231
`
`Dose.
`09
`1' 0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.1
`
`Imme_g:€:jy1:?{e1r1fi11ing_
`Sensitive
`=o=N0t sensitive
`*NOt sensitive
`_
`,
`_
`,
`Not sensitive
`
`. 2.
`
`X
`
`.
`
`3 ‘rgosiatafiig fi1.lli.ng.
`Slightly sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`.
`.
`.
`Not sensitive
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`14 ziiggtag.-ti gging.
`Sensitive
`Slightly sensitive
`‘_"N0t sensitive
`- Slightly sensitive
`*Not sensitive
`
`Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc
`for both Experiments Nos. 11 and 12, and between 1.0 and 1.1 cc for Experiment
`
`No. 23.
`
`Experiments Nos. 13, 14 and 24.
`
`PROCAINE SOLUTION 7%.
`
`Filled into ampuls and Arnold-sterilized on 3 consecutive days.
`
`Results.
`
`Expt. NO. 13.
`Immediately after sterilizing.
`
`Expt. No. 14.
`3 mos. after sterilizing.
`
`Expt. No. 24.
`14 mos. after sterilizing.
`
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`
`Sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`
`Sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`
`Sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Slightly sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Dose.
`
`0 ,8
`0 _9
`
`0 .9
`
`*1 ,0
`
`*1.0
`
`1.0
`
`1.1
`
`Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc
`for Experiments Nos. 13, 14 and 24.
`
`Experiments Nos. 15, 16 and 25.
`
`COCAINE SOLUTION 0.6%.
`
`Filled into airipuls and autoclaved for 15 min. at 115° C.
`
`DOSE.
`0 -8
`0 -9
`:33
`*1'0
`1'1
`-
`
`Immediiiigiy lgrciérl iterilizing.
`Sensitive
`Slightly sensitive
`Not sensitive
`1IjI0t Sensitive
`0t Sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`Results.
`
`3 I110§.xgitelfgteiiilizing.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`_
`Sensitive.
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`14 mtgsxgitgizitgréilizing
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive‘ .
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`f Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc
`OI Experiments Nos. 15, 16 and 25.
`Experiments Nos. 17, 18 and 26.
`
`PROCAINE SOLUTION 7%.
`Filled into ampuls, autoclaved for 15 min. at 115° C.
`EX!” N0- 17-
`R6521:Si No 18
`ImmSedi3~t_€1'Y after Stefiliziflg.
`3 mos. alfftier sterilizing.
`Sfinillgve
`.
`I
`Sensitive
`.
`'
`Sefsitiy Sensltive
`Slightly sensitive
`Not SeI\:€.t.
`SEIISIUVC.
`.
`Not Sen:t}V€
`Not sensitive
`Not SenSitfV9
`Not sensitive
`
`E t No 26
`14 mosfigfter sterilizing.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`.
`Sensitive.
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`We
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Dos
`0.;
`0.9
`0.9
`:10
`#10
`1_1
`
`fOrEx1n1ff1um amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc
`Periinents Nos. 17, 18 and 26.
`
`

`
`232
`
`JOURNAL OF THE
`
`Vol. X11, u.,_3
`
`In order to determine whether or not the salts deteriorate with age, fresh solu-
`tions of the reserve salts were made after a period of 14 months and tested for com-
`parison with the tests of the original solutions.
`
`Experiment No. 27.
`
`COCAINE SOLUTION 0.6%.
`
`Results
`
`Dose
`0 ,7
`0 .8
`0 .9
`0,9
`*1_.0
`*1 .0
`1 .1
`
`Expt_ No 3
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`Expt NO. 27.
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc
`for both Experiments Nos. 3 and 27, showing that no deterioration takes place in
`cocaine during a period of‘ 14 months.
`
`Experiment No. 28.
`
`Made from reserve salt 14 months after solution tested under Experiment No. 5.
`
`PROCAINE SOLUTION 7%.
`
`Dose
`0 .8
`0.9
`0 .9
`*1 .0
`
`*1 .0
`
`1 . 1
`
`Results.
`
`Expt. No: 5.
`Sensitive
`Slightly sensitive
`Slightly sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Expt. No. 28.
`Sensitive
`Slightly sensitive
`Slightly sensitive
`Not sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Not sensitive
`
`Minimum amount required to produce complete local anaesthesia is 1.0 cc for
`both Experiments Nos. .3 and 28 showing that no deterioration takes place in pro-
`caine during a period of 14 months.
`
`EFFECTS OF REPEATED STERILIZATION.
`In the discussion of last year’s paper it was stated that in some operations
`surgeons use solutions of cocaine as high as 20% in strength and that owing to the
`general opinion that resterilization destroyed its activity,
`in most hospitals all
`unused portions of such solutions were discarded.
`Therefore, in order to determine the effects of resterilization upon the activiil)’
`of solutions of cocaine and procaine, I prepared a 20% solution of cocaine and a. 50%
`solution of procaine, and filled each into ampuls. One ampul of each lot was diluted
`to the proper strength and tested on dogs. The remaining ampuls were then au’£0‘
`claved at 115° C. for 15 minutes. Another ampul of each lot was then diluted to
`the proper strength and tested. The remaining ampuls were again autoclaved at
`115° C. for 15 minutes and another ampul tested. This procedure was I‘€Peated
`until each lot was sterilized and tested five times.
`
`The results of
`
`these experiments follow:
`
`

`
`M923
`
`Marc
`
`AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION
`
`.
`
`233
`
`_
`
`S°m.°i1° t- n
`Bef°‘° Sterfllii lotion
`After lst Sterllfaation
`After 2nd Sterliizzation
`After 3r:S:::1iZatiOn
`:31 Eterflization
`
`Solutiom
`Before Sterilization
`After lst sterilization
`After 2nd Sterilization
`After 3rd sterilization
`After 4th sterilization
`After 5th sterilization
`
`COCAINE 20% SOLUTION.
`
`Amount required to produce complete
`local anaesthesia.
`
`1.0 cc (0.6%)
`1 .0 cc (0 .6%)
`1 .0 cc (0 .6_%)
`1.0 cc (0 .6%)
`1 .0 cc (0.6%)
`1 .0 cc (0.6%)
`
`PROCAINE 50% SOLUTION;
`
`Amount required to produce complete
`local anaesthesia.
`1.0 cc (7.0%)
`1 -0 CC (7 -0%)
`1 .0 cc (7.0%)
`1 .0 CC (7 -0%)
`1 .0 cc (7 -0%)
`1 .0 CC (7 -0%)
`
`Physical appearance.
`
`Clear, colorless
`Clear, colorless
`Clear, colorless
`Clear, colorless
`A Clear, colorless
`Clear, colorless
`
`_
`Physical appearance.
`Clear, colorless
`C1931’: amber
`Clear, amber
`C1931‘: amber
`C1931‘, amber
`Clear» amber
`
`These results show that five successive sterilizations produced no apparent
`effect upon the activity of the above solutions of cocaine and procaine.
`It will also be noted that sterilization at 1 15 ° C. changes the procaine solution
`from colorless to an amber color, and that this change is not accompanied by any
`change in activity.
`'
`
`CONCLUSION.
`
`The activity of local anaesthetics can be quantitatively determined by the
`method proposed.
`The activity of solutions of cocaine and procaine is not affected by the addition
`of 0.3% Three Cresols or by sterilization by means of the Arnold sterilizer or auto-
`clave at 115° C. for 15 minutes.
`5,
`Unsterilized solutions of cocaine and procaine, solutions sterilized without heat
`and solutions sterilized with heat apparently lose no activity during a period of
`3months.
`'
`V
`
`~07
`9/0
`
`a
`
`Unsterilized solutions of cocaine and solutions of cocaine sterilized Without
`heat apparently lose about 10% of their activity during a period of 14 months.
`Solutions of cocaine which have been Arnold-sterilized apparently lose about
`0f their activity during a period of 14 months.
`Solutions of cocaine which have been autoclaved for 15 minutes at 115° C.
`pparenfly lose no activity during a period of 14 months.
`ti0nSUIt1Sterilized‘solutions of procaine, solutions sterilized without heat and solu-
`S erilized with heat, lose no activity during a period of 14 months.
`Etocffine fmd procaine in the dry form are apparently stable and show no signs
`emfat19n during 14 months.
`
`old
`
`times at 115° C. with
`out any apparent loss of activity.
`Finau
`Quicifor hy the author wishes to acknowledge his indebtedness to Mr. Arnold '
`1s able assistance in connection with the laboratory work.
`PHARMACODYNA
`MIC LABORATORY,
`H. K. MULFORD COMPANY,
`AUGUST 8, 1922.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket