throbber
Iiébel In; I
`hm ale:
`"““““ ‘rt
`
`- BREVIBLOU INJ
`(esmolol hydrochloride)
`III lnl Ailplil — 2.5 |: N_iIT_FIIII BIIIECT INTRAVENOUS IIIJEi2TIiIN.,AMPlll Mil
`INFUSION ISEE IIDSAEE ANII -AIIMINISNIATIBN SEBTIONI.
`in rat. Single llm ml —' llill up
`.
`DESCRIPTION
`BHEVlBLOc°'iesmoloi Hcl) is a beta,-selective (cardioselectivel adrenergic receptor blocking agent with a very
`short duration oi action (elimination hail-lite is approximately 9 minutes). Esmolol HGI is:
`i :)-Illethyl p-I2-hydroxy-3-iisopropylaminol propnxy] hydrocinnamale hydrochloride and has the lollowing struc-
`ture:
`'
`.
`'
`
`AUG l 5 1988
`
`APPROVED
`
`Ro'd- i_
`
`
`cH_.02ccii.cH,-QocH‘,cHoHcH.NHcH(cH.l..Hct
`Esmolol ticl has the empirical lormlua C15Hz5ND4CI and a molecular weight at 331 B. it has one asymmetric center
`and exists as an enantiomerlc pair.
`_
`‘
`Esmolol Hcl is-a white to ml-white crystalline powder. It is a relatively hydrophilic compound which is very soluble
`in water and lreely soluble in alcohol. its partition coellicient ioctanollwatert at pit 7.0 is 0.42 compared to 17.0 tor
`proptanolol.
`_
`-
`BHEVl8L0c° iesmoiol licll INJECTION is a clear. colorless to light yellow. sterile. nonpyrogerlic solution tor intrave-
`nousinlusion alter dilution
`‘
`2.5 g. 10 mL Ampul — Each mL contains 250 mg estnolol Hcl in 25% Propylene Glycol. USP. 25% Alcohol. USP and
`water tor injection. USP; buttered with t7.lJ mg Sodium Acetate. USP. and 0.007l5 mL Glacial Acetic Acid. USP.
`Sodium hydroxide andlor hydrochloric acid added. as necessary. to adiust pH to 3.5-5.5.
`too mg. to mL Single Dose Vial
`-— Each m‘L contains 10 mg esmoiol HCI and Water lor injection. USP; buttered
`with 2.8 mg Sodium Acetate. USP. and 0.546 mg Glacial Acetic Acid. USP. sodium hydroxide andlor hydrochloric _
`acid added. as necessary. to adjust pH to 4.5-5.5.
`-
`.
`I
`Blllllliltl PHTIIIIIAGOLIJIIV
`-
`BHEVlB[Oc° (esmolol
`lftcil is a beta.-selective lcardioseicctive) adrenergic receptor blocking agent with rapid
`onset. a very shortduratton of action. and ‘no significant intrinsic sympathorttimeiic or membrane stabilizing activity
`at therapeutic dosages. its elimination hall-lite alter intravenous inlusion is approximately 9 minutes. BHEVIBLOCO
`inhibits the beta, receptors located chielly in cardiac muscle. but this prelerential ettect is not absolute and at
`higher doses it begins to inhibit beta, receptors located cttielly in the bronchial and vascular musculature
`-
`Phlrmacoltlutlc; and liatalrellxu
`.
`.
`—
`BliEVlBLDC' Iesmolo|.HG|) is rapidly metabolized by hydrolysis oi the ester linkage. chietly by. the esterases in the
`cytosoi oi redbiood cells and not by_piasma chollnesterases or red cell membrane acetylcholinesterase Total body
`clearance in man was lound to be.about 20 Ukglhr. which is greater than cardiac output; thus the metabolism ol
`. BREVl8LOc° is not limited
`by the rate ol blood llow to metabolizing tissues such as the liver.or aliected by hepatic
`a
`ut minutes.
`-
`orbgenasl blood llow. BliEVl8LOC° has a rapid distribution hall-tile oi about 2 minutes and an eltminationhall-lite ot
`Using an appropriate loading dose. steady-state blood levels oi BliEVlBLOc° tor dosages lrom 50-300 moglkglmin
`are obtained within live minutes. (Steady-stale is reached in about 30 minutes withutt the loading dose.) Steady-
`state blood levels at BHEVlBLOc° increase linearly over this dosage range and elimination kinetics are dose-
`independenl over this range. steady-state blood levels are maintained during intusion but decrease rapidly alter
`termination of the inlusion. Because at its shirt halt-lite. blood levels at BREVlBLOC° can be rapidly altered by In-
`creasing ordecreasing the inlusion rate and_rapidly'eliminated by discontinuing the inlusion.
`_ Consistent with the high rate at blood-based metabolism ol.BRE\llBLOC', less than 2% ol the drug is excreted un-
`changed in the u'rine._within' 24 hours ofthe end oi inlusion. approximately 73-88% oi the dosage has been account-
`’
`ed lot in the urine as the acid metabolite oi BREVlBLOc'.
`Metabolism oi BHEVIBLOC5 results in the lormatlon oi the corresponding tree acid and methanol. The acid metabo-
`lite has been shown in animals to have about 1I1500th the activity ol esmolol and in normal volunteers its blood
`levels do not correspond to the level at beta-blockade. The acid metabolite has an elimination hall-lite ol about 3.7
`hours and is excreted in the urlnefwith a clearance approximately equivalent to the glomeruiar tiltrationrate. Excre-
`'tion oi the acid metabolite is slgnllicantty decreasedin patients with renal tftsease. with the elimination hall—iile in-
`creased to about ten-told that o normals; and plasma levels considerably elevated.
`.
`Methanol blood levels. monitored in sublects receiving BHEVIBLOCO lor up to 6 hours at -300 mcglkglmin and 24
`met an
`toxicity.
`-
`'
`houas atfll 50 mcglkglmin. approximated endogenous levels and were less than 2% at levels usually associated with
`BHE\_IlBL0(-)0 has bee'n'shown to be 55% bound to human plasma protein. while the acid metabolite is only 10%
`bound.
`'
`'
`'
`-
`
`_
`_
`Phatlucedyaantict
`Clinical pharmacology studies in normal volunteers have conlirmed the beta blocking activity oi BREVlBLOC' (es-
`moioi Hcli. showing reduction in heart rate at rest and during exercise. and attenuation at lsoproterenol-induced in-
`creases in heart rate. Blood levels.ol BREVlBLOc° have been shown to correlate with extent at beta blockade Alter
`termination oi inlusion. substantial recovery trom beta blocltadeis observed in 10-20 minutes
`in humanelectrophysiology studies. BREVIBLOCO produced ettccts typical ot a beta blocker: a decrease in the
`heart rate, increase in sinus cycle length. prolongation oi the sinus node recovery time. prolongation ot the AH inter-
`val during normal sinus rhythm and during atrial pacing. and an increase in antegrade Wenclrebach cycle length.
`in patients undergoing radionuclide angiogtaphy. BREVIBLOCO. at dosages at 200 mcglkglmin.
`reduced reduc-
`tions inheatt rate, systolic blood pressure. rate pressure product. tell and right ventricular election raction and car-
`diac_ index at rest, which were similar in magnitude to those produced by intravenous propranolol (4 mg). During ex-
`ercise. 8HEViBLOC° produced reductions. in heart rate. rate pressure product and cardiac index which were also
`simllarto those produced by propranoloi. but produced a significantly larger tall in systolic blood pressure. in pa-
`tients undetgoingcardiac catheterizatldn. the maximum therapeutic despot soc ltluglhglttiitr ul ont'.vtoi_.oo- plu-
`duced similar etlccts. and, in addition. there were small. ctinicallylnsignrlnztnt. increases In the Ielt ventricular and
`diastolic pressure and
`lmonary capillary wedge pressure. At thirty minutes alter the discontinuation of
`BREVlBi;0C° inlusion. at oi the hemodynamic parameters had returned to pretreatment levels.
`-
`The relative cardloselectivity oi BliEvlBLqc° was demonstrated in _10 mildly_asthm_atic pattenls._lnlustons oi
`BREVlBL_0_C° (100. 200 and 300 mcglkglmtn) produced no significant increases in specttic airway resistance com_—
`pared to placebo. At 300 mcglkglmin. BflEVl_t!L0p° produced slightly enhanced bronchomotor Sel'lSiIiVlIy to dry air
`stimulus. These ettects were not clinically significant. and BHEVlBLOc' was well tolerated by all patients. six oi
`the patients also received intravenous propratiolol. and at a dosage of 1 mg. two experienced significant. _svmo-
`tomatic bionchosliasm reoulfino I>f0iIchod_itator treatment. one other propranoiol-treated patient also experienced
`dry air-induced broncttospasm. No adverse pulmonary ettects were observed ll'llI33I'9"I5 tflilfl 305’? WI“? ’°°°'V_°d
`therapeutic dosagesol BltEVlBLOc° tor treatment ol supraventncular tachycardia (St patients) or in penoptrattve
`settings (32 patients).
`
`MYLAN ET
`
`00001
`AL. — EXHIBIT 1009
`
`MYLAN ET AL. - EXHIBIT 1009
`
`0001
`
`

`
`V
`_
`given with wartarin, but this is'not_like_iy _to b_gctinicaily__irn_port_ant.
`Whemdbexin-oIdifiGliBt!D'€
`(esmoloi HGT) were concomitantly administered intravenously to-normal volunteers.
`ere was-a 10-20% increase i digoxin blood levels at some time points. Digoxin did not aiiect BREVIBLOCO phar-
`acokir1gfi_g‘s,tV]i.fi;firj§,:;Qveno morphine and I3REVIB_LOC' were concomitantly administered in normal subjects.
`eitect ‘on morphine load I
`is was seen, _but BREVlBLOC° steady-state blood levels were‘ increased by 46% in
`presence at morfihine. goo er pharmacokinetic parameters were changed.
`_
`tjem __
`u
`_
`_ _on the duration ot succinylcholine-induced neuromuscularblockade was studied in pa-
`t ndw oitlg s_fli. cry. The onset or neuromuscular blockade byssuccinylchotine was unatlected by
`EEOC‘. but thedu ation oi neuromuscular blockade was prolonged trom Sminutes tu8 minutes.
`B
`Although the interactions observed in these studies do not appear to be or maior clinical importance. BREVIBLOCD
`W3 ar n.
`'
`'
`shorrérldlbe titrated with caution in patients being treated concurrently with oigoxin. morphine, succinylchotine or
`carcinogenesis. flute emit. lII_|IlH'lItbIl at Fertility
`Because or its shon erm usage no carcinogenicity. mutagenlcity or reproductive pertormance studies have been
`conducted with BREVIBLOC‘.
`
`mgnlcy Clllflflfl ti
`. Teratogenicity studies in rats at intravenous dosages oi BREVIBLOCO up to 3000 mcglkglmin Iten times the maxi-
`mum humanmaintenance dosage) lor 30 minutes daily produced no evidence oi maternal toxicity. embryotoxicity
`or teratogenicity. white a dosage ot i_ 0.000 meg/kg/min produced maternal toxicity and lethality. In rabbits. intrave-
`nous dosages up to 1000 rncglltg/min tor 30 minutes daily produced no evidence of maternal toxicity. ernbryotoxici-
`ty or teratogenicity. white 2500 mcg/kglmin produced minimal maternal toxicity and increased ietat resorptions
`There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women. BREVlBLOC° should be used during
`pregnancy only it the potential benefit iustities the potential risk to the lotus.
`luraien flutters
`.
`it is not known whether BREViBLOC° is excreted in human milk, however, caution should be exercised when
`BREVIBLDCO is adrninisteredrto a nursing woman.
`reliable tin
`.
`The safety and eitectiveness or BiiEViBLOC° in children have not been established.
`lt|VEflS_E_ IIEIIITIOIS
`. Supnmtrtcrriar Tachycardia
`The ioiiowing adverse reaction rates are based on use at BREVlBLOC' tesmoloi HCII In almost 400 ctinil trial pa-
`tients with supraventricuiar tachycardia in addition. over 600 patients have been‘ exposed in clinical studies at
`other conditions. The most ‘important adverse‘ etteci has been hypotension (see Warnings). Most adverse eliects
`have been mild and transient.
`-
`'
`‘
`liarrilmlcrrilr - Symptomatic hypotension (diaphoresis. dizziness) occurred in 12% or patients; and therapy was
`discontinued in about tt%. about hail of whom were.symptomatic. Asymptomatic hypotension occurred in about
`25% or patients Hypotension resolved during BREVIBLOCO infusion in 63% or these patients and within 30 minutes
`alter discontinuation oi inlusion in 80% at the remaining patients. Diaphoresis accompanied hypotension in 1076 of
`items Peripheral ischemia occurred in approximately 1% oi patients. Paiior. tlushing. bradycardia (heart rate
`ess than 50 beats per minute); chest pain. syncope. pulmonary edema and heart block have each been reported in‘
`less than 1% at patients. In two patients without supraventricular tachycardia but with serious coronary artery dis-
`ease (post interior myocardial intarction or unstable angina). severe bradycardialslnus pauselasystole has devel-
`oped. reversible in both cases with discontinuation oi treatn_rent.
`-
`-
`clntnt ttenrm 8 tut ,— Dizziness has occurred in 3% or patients; somnolence in 3%. contusion. headache. and agi-
`tation in about 2 , and tatig_ue in about 1% ct patients. Paresthesia. asthenia. depression. abnormal thinking. anxi-
`ety, anorexia. and lightheadedness were reported in less than 1% or patients One briet (30 second) episode or grand
`mat seizure has been reported.
`Iuplralory —— Bronchospasm. wheezing. dyspnea. nasal congestion. rhonchi, and rates have each been reported in
`less than 1% ct patients.
`_
`_
`_
`._
`Intrcietuttni — Nausea was reported In 7% ol patients Vomiting has occurred in about 1% or patients". Dyspepsia.
`constipation. dry mouth. and abdominal discomlort have each occurred in less than 1% at patients. Taste perversion
`has also beenlreported.
`'
`-
`Ilrie Iieiuriee Siirl — inlusion site reactions including intlammation and lnduratlon were reported In about 895 or pa-
`tients Edema. erythema. skin discoloration, and burning at the inlusion site have each occurred in lesslhan iii of
`patients.
`_
`_
`.
`Itirceilroem 7 Each oi the totiowing has been reported in less than 1% oi patients: Urinary retention. speech disor-
`der. abnormat vision, mtdscapuier pain, rigors. and-tever.
`'
`'
`IIIEBIIDSAEE
`Acute Toxicity
`A lew cases oi massive accidental overdosage oi BREVIBLOCP (esmolol .HCit have occurred-due to errors in dilution.
`. These intravenous bolus doses oi BREVIBLOCO oi 5000-6250 mcglkg over 1-2 minutes have produced hypotension.
`bradycardia, drowsiness and loss or consciousness The eilecis have resolved within to minutes, in some cases
`with administiation ot a pressor agent.
`Because of its approximately 9-minute elimination halt-lite. the first step in the management of toxicity should be
`to discontinue the'8REVtBLOC° inlusion. Then. based on the observed clinical ettects. the following general mea-
`sures should also be considered:
`lruycerllr: intravenous administration oi atropine or another anticholinergic drug.
`Ireactespunz intravenous administration or a beta, stimulating agent and/or a theophyiilne derivative.
`tlrllrc Flllm: Intravenous adrninistratian or a diuretic andlor digitalis glycoside. in shock resulling'trorn inade-.
`quate cardiac contractility, intravenous administration oi dopamine, dobutamine. isopraterenal. or amrinone may be
`considered.
`>
`-
`iyupteutie llypotmlee: intravenous administration or iluids andlor pressor agents
`,
`ogs_r%irrro ilorirrirrsrnerrorr
`I
`Ti'lE'2.5 g AMPUL IS NOT FOR DIRECT INTiiAVENOu_s INJECTION. THIS DOSAGE FORM is A CONCENTRATED.
`WI
`0_
`B A
`O ATE. BREVIB 00° SHOULD NOT BE MIXED WITH OTHER DRUGS PRIOR TO DILUTION IN
`Pogfiiy
`%lLisT BE DIL%_TEI_J PRIOR TO ITS INFUSION. BiiEVlBLOC° SHOULD NOT BE ADMIXED
`A SUITABLE INTRAVENOUS FLUID. (See compatibility Section below.)
`Ililtiu: Asepticaily prepare a 10 mgImL intusion. by adding tw_o 2.5 g ampuls to a 500 mL container. or one 2.5 g
`ampul to a 250 mL container. at a compatible intravenous solution listed below. (Remove average prior to dilution as
`appropriate). This yields a iinal concentration or to mgImt.. The diluted solution is stable tor at least 24 hours at
`room temperature. Note: concentrations at BREViBLOC° greater than 10 mgImL are likely to produce irritation on
`,ra v n.
`....— ,...-.' _,a...
`ttnorrtirgled inlusion (see Precautions). BREVlBLOc° has',’however, been welltolerated when administered‘via a cen-
`r-.-in. p-,-.3 .........,
`
`
`
`v-tr-um-_u~o—-_.,
`
`.‘
`
`one so :“’"“""
`-* '“"“'”' '“
`E6
`-no.-. -\~q._..-<-...~-............_‘.. __,,,_ ____‘
`
`[=:‘},'.E:y3=.rE§;.
`
` ooo2
`
`0002
`
`

`
`y
`-
`;
`_
`_
`.
`_
`Stiprmatrlcuiar Tachycardia
`In two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled comparisons oi BREV|BLElC° (esmolol llCli with placebo
`and propranolol. maintenance doses of 50 to 300 mcg/kglmin oi flliEVl8LOC° were lound to be more ellective than
`placebo and about as eilective as propr‘anoiol.'3-G mg given by bolus injections. in the trwtmenl oi supraventricular
`tachycardia. principally atrial lihriilatlon and atrial llulter. the majority ol these patients developed their arrhyth-
`mias posloperativeiy. About 60-70% ol the patients treated with BREViBLOc° had a desired therapeutic ellect
`(either a 20% reduction in heart rate. a decrease in heart rate to less than too bpm. or. rarely. conversion to NSRI
`and about 95% at those who responded did so at a dosage oi 200 mcg/kglmin or less. The average ellective dosage
`oi BREViBLOC° was approximately 100-115 mcglkglmin in the two studies. Other multlcenter baseline-controlled
`studies pave essentially similar results in the comparison with propranoiol. about 50% oi patients in both-the
`BREVlBLOC° and propranoiol groups were on concomitant digoxin Response rates were slightly higher with both
`beta-blockers in the digoxin-treated patients.

`in all studies signilicanl decreases cl blood pressure occurred in 20-50% oi patients, identilied either as adverse
`reaction reports by investigators. or by observation at s stolic pressure ias than 90 mmHg or diastolic pressure
`less than 50 mmHg. The hypotension was symptomatic erlnainiy diaphoresis or dizziness) in about 12% ct patients.
`and therapy was discontinued in about 11% ct patients, about hall oi whom were symptomatic: in comparison to
`propranolol, hypotension was about three times as lrequent with BllEVlBLOC°, 53% vs. 17%. The hypolension was
`rapidly reversible with decreased infusion rate or alter rliscontinuation oi therapy with BllEVlBLOC'. For both
`BflEvl8L0c° and propranoloi. hypotension was reponed less ireoueitly in patients receiving concomitant digoxin.
`IIDIGATIIINSAMII USAGE
`'
`_
`"
`so
`ventricular Tachycardia
`.
`B EViBLOC' (esmolol HCi)' is indirzted tor the rapid control oi ventricular rate in patients with atrial iibriliatton or
`atrial tlut_ter in perioperative. postoperative. or other emergent circumstances where short term control at ventricular
`rate with a shon-acting agent is desirable. BREVIELOC‘ is also indicated in noncompensatory sinus tachycardia
`where. in the physician's judgement. the rapid heart rate requires specific intervention. BliEViBLOC° is not intended
`tor use in chronic settings where transter to another agent is anticipated.
`'
`.
`.
`corrrnntrrotcartons
`_
`BHEVIBLOC“ (esmolol Hcll is contraindicated in patients with sinus bradycardia. heart block greater than lirst
`degree, cardiogenic shock or overt heart lailure (see Wamingsi:
`VRIIIIINGS
`ilypatmianz in clinical trials 20-50% oi patients treated with BREVIBLOCO (esmolol Hcli have experienced hypoten-
`sion. generally dellned as systolic pressure less than 90 mmlig and/or diastolic pressure less than 50 mmHg. About
`12% ol the patients have been symptomatic (mainly diaphoresis or dizziness). llypotension can occur at any dose"
`but is dose-related so that doses beyond 200 mcglkgimln are not recommended. Patients _should be closely moni-
`tored. especially ll_pretreatment blood pressure is low. Decrease oi dose or termination of intusion reverses hypoten-
`slon. usually within 30 minutes
`'
`Carlin Fallm: Sympathetic stimulation is necssary in supporting circulatory function in'congestiva heart lailure,
`and beta blockade carries the potential hazard oi lurther depressing myocardial contractility and precipitating more
`severe lailure. Continued depression at the myorardium with beta blocking agents over a period oi time can. in
`some cases. lead to cardiac lailure. At the first sign or symptom ol impending cardiac lailure. the dosage should be
`reduced or BHEViBLOC' should be withdrawn. Although this dosage adiustment or withdrawal may be sulticient
`aoe— -
`'
`.
`beca)use oi the short elimination hall-lite at BFl£ViBLOG°. speciiic treatment may also be considered. (See Overdos-
`lrmiinxputt: fllnuu: l'AllEliTl Willi Inlillliilltsrlstill IJISEASES slltttllll. II sEilEllAl.
`lllit
`llEt:EllE IEIA
`lltllllili. Because oi its relative beta, selectivity and tltratabiiity. Bi'tEVIBLOc° may be used ‘with motion in pa-
`tients with bronchospastic diseases. However. since beta. selectivity is not absolute, BiiEVlBLOC° should he care-
`luiiy titrated to obtain the lowest possible etleclivc dose. in the event at bronchospasm. the intusion should be ter-
`minaled immediately; a beta, stimulating agent may beadministered it conditions warrant butshould be "used with
`particular caution as patients already have rapid ventricular rates.
`limln lalliln and it aglyunla: BREVIBLOCO should be used with caution in diabetic patients requiring a beta
`blocking agent. Beta b ockers may mask tachycardia occurring with hypoglycemia. but other manilestatlcris such
`as dizliness and sweating may not he signiiicantiy aliected.
`.
`PHEGMITIIIIIS
`.
`.
`General
`intusion concentrations cl 20 rngImi._ were asociated with more venous irritation and thrombophiebltis than con-
`centrations ot 10 mglmL. Concentrations greater than 10 mgImL should, therelore. be avoided.
`.
`.
`Because the acid metabolite oi BltEVlBLOC° is primarily excreted unchanged by the kidney. BREVlBLOc' (esmolol
`HCI) should be administered with caution to patients with impaired renal lunction. The elimination hail-tile oi the
`acid metabolite was prolonged ten-told and the plasma level was considerably elevated in patients with end-stage
`renal disease
`.
`‘
`.
`'
`ling iataractlm
`catecholamine-depleting drugs, e.g., reserpine. may have an additive ellect when given with beta blocking agents
`Patients treated concurrently with BltEVlBLOc' and a catecholamine depletor should therelore be closely observed
`tor evidenm oi hypotension or marked bradycardia. which may result in vertigo. syncope. or postural hypotension.
`it study of interaction between BREWBLOC0 and wartarin showed that concomitant administration oi BHEVtBi.0cI
`and warlarln does not alter wartarin plasma levels BREVlBLOC° concentrations were equivocally higher when
`
`t".'_J
`
`15,5.‘-‘...
`-...Q_un‘\da3'-0-4"‘?
`
`rrmswr rot: “'*'-----------«-
`---~-.. .( ....
`..--...l3003
`
`
`:“"""""” “"””"""”tss ..
`'! ."l'?'It
`
`tlmr
`I"7":i'F'
`
`0003
`
`

`
`
`
`I-‘n:-r-‘aw:-oagana--o-qo-bguu.
`
`..p..¢-.--. -z:14V.--é= ' _
`
`'-.
`
`ii
`
`.‘=1_'§"1'fi.
`
`._.4.n.—.-.-rv~:-.4-4:-.-.w.<-4!-.'I"\"'»‘-“=‘
`
`.
`
`.
`’
`2
`'
`1
`-
`'_
`0'
`roo.'i‘I'iil’_L'""
`This tfosage iorm is prediiuted to provide a ready-to‘-"use l0 mglmt concentration recommended for Brevibior:° in-
`travenous administration. it may be used to administer the appropriate Brevibloc' loading dosage infusions by
`hand-held syringe while the maintenance infusion is being prepared.
`’
`I
`_
`ilolrnvanlrievllr Tachycardia
`in the treatment of supraventricutar tachycardia. responses to BREVIBLOC° usually (over 9596) occur within the
`range of 50 to 200 mcglkglrliin. The average eltective dosage is approximately 100 mcglkglmin although dosages
`as low as 25 mcglkglmin have been adequate in some patients. Dosages as high as "300 mcgllrglmin have been
`used. but these provide little added effect and an increased rate oi adverse "effects. and are not recommended.
`Dosage of BREVlBLOC° in supraventricular tachycardia must be individualized by titration _in which each step _con-
`. sisis of a loading dosage followed by a maintenance dosage.
`To initiate treatment of a patient with supraventricular tachycardia, administer a loading dosage infusion of 500
`mcgikglmin oi BREVIBLOCD for one minute ioiiowed by a-4 min maintenance infusion of 50 mcglkglmin. ii an ade-
`quate therapeutic eliect is not observed within five minutes. repeat the same loading dosage and follow with a main-
`tenance inluslon increased to 100 mcglkglmin.
`Continue titration procedure as above. repeating loading infusion (500 mcgllrglmin for 1 minute}. increasing main-
`tenance intusion by increments of 50 meg/irgl min (for 4 minutes). As the desired heart rate or a salety end-point
`(e.g., lowered blood pressurei is approached. omit the loading intusion and reduce incremental dose in maintenance
`intusion from 50 mcglirglmln to 25 mcg/kglmin or lower. Also. if desired. increase interval between titration steps
`from 5 to 10 minutes.
`This specific dosage regimen has not been studied intraoperatively and. because of the time required for titration.
`may not be optimal for intraoperative use.
`7
`-
`Maintenance dosages above 200 meg/kglmin have not been shown to have signlticantiy increased benefits. and the
`safety of dosages above 300 mcglkglmin has not been studied.
`In the event of an adverse reaction, the dosage of BREVIBLOCO may be reduced or discontinued. it a focal infusion
`site reaction develops. an alternative infusion site should be used. The use of butteriiy needles should be avoided.
`Abrupt cessation of BREVlBLOC° in patients has not been reported to produce the withdrawal effects which may
`occur with abrupt withdrawal of beta blockers following chronic use in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. How-
`ever, caution should still be used-in abruptly discontinuing infusions of BREVlBLOC° in CAD patients.
`After achieving an adequate control of the heart rate and a stable clinical status in patients with supraventricuiar
`tachycardia. transition to alternative antiarrhythmic agents such as propranoioi. digoxin. or verapamii. may beac-
`complished. A recommended guideline for such a transition is given below but the physician should carefully con-
`sider the labeling instructions for the altomative agent-selected:
`.
`.
`Altarnfln mat
`ilmgl
`,
`,
`Propranoiol hydrochloride
`10-20 mg ‘g 4-6 h
`Digoxin _
`O.l25-0.5 mg q 6 h (pp. or i.v.)
`Verapamii
`80 mg q 6 h
`The dosage of BREVIBLOCO should be reduced as follows:
`i. Thin gr’I‘r;utes following the first dose of the alternative agent. reduce the initsion rate‘of BREViBLOC' by one-
`haii 5
`.
`'
`2. Following the second dose of the alternative agent. mmitor the oatlent's response and if satisiactory control is
`maintained for the first hour. discontinue BREViBLOC°
`The use of infusions oi BREVIBLOCO up to 24 hours has been well documented; in addition. limited data irorn 24-48
`hrs iN=4D) indicate that BREViBLOC'- _is'w'eI| tolerated up to 48 hours.
`.
`.
`_
`_
`.
`-
`can ali_Illii1 will count llnl lntrumrrn Fluid:
`-
`BR
`lBLDC' (esrnoloi HCl
`lNJECTiON was tested for compatibility with ten commonly used intravenous fluids _at
`a final concentration of to mg esmolol _HCl per mL BREVIBLOCO INJECTION was found to be ccrnpatibie with the
`ioliowi_n_g solutions and was stable for at least 24 hours at controlled room temp'erature_or under refrigeration:
`’
`y
`'
`Dextrose (5%) Injection. USP
`-
`Dextrose (5%) in Lactated Ringer's injection
`Dextrose (5%) in Ringers in action
`Dextrose (5%) and Sodium hioride (0.45%) injection. USP
`Dextrose (5%)_ and Sodium Chloride (0.9%) iniection. USP
`_-
`Lactated Ringers in ectidn. USP
`"
`_
`_
`Potassium Chloride 40 mEqIlite'r) in Dextrose (5%) injection. use
`Sodium Chloride (0.45%) Injection. USP
`Sodium Chloride (0.9%) injection. USP
`8REVlBLDC' INJECTION was NOT compatible with Sodium Bicarbonate (5%) injection. USP.
`ttato: Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to admin-
`istration. whenever solution and container permit.
`‘
`'
`lfflill SUPPLIED" .
`NDC 0094-0015-7i. lilo mg — 10 mL vial. Box of 20
`.
`NDC 0094-00254 8. 2.5 g -— iii mL ampui. Box of 10
`STORE AT CONTROLLED ROOM TEMPERATURE (59‘-86‘F. l5‘-30‘C). Freezing does not adversely aftect the prod-
`uct. but exposure to elevated temperatures should be avoided.
`.
`' no not Pharmaceuticals
`E. t du Pontdo Nemours and Company .
`lMlrn_ing_ton. Delaware 19898
`--—---
`Date: May. 1988
`.
`
`.
`
`_
`I M3049.
`
`0004
`
`0004

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket