throbber
Sony Corp. v. Raytheon Co.
`IPR2016-00209
`
`Raytheon2018-0001
`
`

`
`dates follow. Operatorskilsl rc:,11paeidn;aandq-.::n°°k'“‘” P"°°¢'
`
`.
`
`on
`
`es: open.
`
`“W91! '4N'C). the seed ' di
`
`-
`
`.9305
`
`Raytheon2018-0002
`
`Raytheon2018-0002
`
`

`
`OONORA ON QYSTAL GROWTH AND PlIO0E$lNO TECIIIOLOGY
`
`7
`
`tions. Once the crystal teaches the diameter desired. the autotnatic-diatneter-
`control (ADC) system is turned on and closed-loop controls regulate the
`diatnaer.
`
`'l'he process continues through body growth. As the crystal is pulled. the
`melt level in the crucible drops relative to other hot-zone components. Be-
`cause this changing melt level creates undesirable changes in thermal profiles
`at the growth interface. an electromechanical crucible-lifl system is normally
`provided to elevate the crucible continuously during the growth procus. The
`rate of lifl. in turn. affects other growth parameters. so the furnace operator
`must monitor visual indiations of structure on the growing crystal to assure
`that crystal pull speed and crucible lift rate are appropriate.
`Body growth proceeds at pull speeds ranging from 50 to |00 tum/It. until
`only a small volume of melt remains in the cntcible: at this point the round-
`off procedure begits. Structure must be maintained tnetieulously during
`round-off. because crystal defects such as “slip" can propagate up through
`the still-plastic crystal body. After round-off‘. power to the furnace is turned
`offand the crystal is allowed to cool. The crystal may later be heat treated to
`stabilize electrially active oxygen.
`
`Crystal Evaluation
`
`The completed crystal is imrnetsed in an etchant designed to highlight de-
`fects such as slip. When the shoulder and round-off portions lave been
`cropped with a diamond saw. resistivity and type measurements are made
`and recorded for the crystal ends. The cropped ingot is ground to the desired
`dillnctcr. and may be rechecked for atrial profile by taking resistivity read-
`ings along the length of its cylindrical surface.
`At a location determined by atomic orientation. a flat is ground along the
`length of the ingot: th's will serve as a reference plane for later operations.
`The crystal may now be sliced into wafers or cropped into segments for spe-
`cific end users.
`
`CZ Materiel Cltcmerertk-rt‘a
`
`Muchofthccurtent tesearchonsiliconisfocusedontheexccedingy
`complex relationships among certain impurities and defects in silicon crys-
`tals. benuse point defects in wafersubstratcs exert an increasingly strong in-
`lluence on final die yields. This surge of interest in crystal defect formation
`arises from the shrinking die and circuit-element size used in ver'y-large-ocale-
`integration (VLSI) technology. ‘nae complexities lie partially in the fact that
`impurity concentration alone does not constitute defect formation: other de-
`termining factors include thermal gradients at the time of solidification. lo-
`calized melt convection. instantaneous growth rates. melt—temelt phe-
`nomena. and thermal conditions after solidification.
`
`Raytheon2018-0003
`
`
`
`Raytheon2018-0003
`
`

`
`
`, l§o
`
`
`8
`
`SILICON PROCESING
`
`Current technial literature on the subject of crystal defects is plentiful.
`but its utilintion in production practices presents many challenges. To de-
`termine accurately the influence of process changes in crystal growth upon
`device yields in a particular fabrication line may involve an elapsed time of
`three to six months. and requires detailed communication between water
`supplier and user.
`
`Oxygen and Carbon
`
`Control of oxygen and carbon in the growing crystal is an active area of
`research. Oxygen is prwent in C2 silicon as a result ofdissolution of the sil-
`ica crucible wall. and generally is higher in concentration at the top end ofan
`ingot. Reported concentrations-range from <10 to >40 ppm. Oxygen influ-
`ences wafer strength. resistance to thermal warping. minority-carrier life-
`time. and intrinsic impurity gettering. There is evidence that the level of oxy-
`gen content influences die yields. and that appropriate levels for maximum
`yield depend upon the particular device production technology.
`Carbon is present in C2 silicon as a result ofcontributions from the origi-
`nal polycrystalline material and from graphite components of the hot zone.
`Reported concentrations range front 0.1 to 7 ppm. with levels usually rising
`throughout the length of the ingot. Carbon is strongly implicated in the gen-
`eration of point defects: its role appears to be interrelated to the presence cl‘
`oxygen.
`
`Carbon and Oxygen Aleastrrentenl/Control
`
`Control of carbon and oxygen must be achieved primarily by the materials
`producer. and substantial efiort is being expended in related applied re-
`searehoxygeneanbepartiallycontrolledbytneansofgrowth techniques
`that minimize the rate of crucible-wall dissolution and reduce the incorpora-
`tion of dissolved oxygen into the growing crystal. Control of carbon is re-
`lated to gas now patterns. hot zone materials. furnace leak integrity. and
`starting material.
`The primary technique for measuring oxygen and carbon concentrations
`employs a transmission/absorption-type infrared spectrophotometer.
`Lengthyandcareful samplcprocessingisnecessary toobtain usableresttlts.
`although the recent introduction of Fourier transform infused equipment
`facilitates rapid rneasuretnent of oxygen and urban on polished slices.
`A subjective indication ofthe influence ofearbon and oxygen on C2 mate-
`rial is provided by a variety of
`tests. This technique employs high-
`temperature oxidation of a polished sample. followed by decoration etching
`and visual examination. Swirl is evidenced as a cloudy appearance. often
`havingastvirled l'orm.that iseatuedbythehigh-densityformationot‘nti-
`croscopic etch pits at sites where concentrated mierodefects occur. Because
`
`Raytheon2018-0004
`
`Raytheon2018-0004
`
`

`
`BONORA ON CRYSTAL GROWTH ADI) PflOCE%lN6 TECFNOLOGY
`
`9
`
`swirl has been correlated to areas of high device-yield loss. CZ growth tech-
`nologies that provide low or zero swirl may improve die yields.
`
`New Developments in Crystal Growing
`
`The field of (‘Z growth is experiencing the emergence of several new tech-
`nologies in such diverse areas as control of oxygen by magnetic lields. liquid-
`silicon recharging. high resistivity. and furnace automation. An overview of
`these areas will provide a general idea of work currently tmder way.
`
`Magnetic (‘Z
`
`In ordinary CZ growth. thermal gradients set up convection currents that.
`when combined with crucible and crystal rotation. give rise to a general flow
`pattern such as that in Fig. 2. This convection-induced flow transports oxy-
`gen through the melt into the liquid-crystal interface via dissolution of the
`quartz crucible.
`The convection currents also give rise to regularly occurring temperature
`transients at the melt-crystal interface. creating what is termed the melt-
`remclt phenomenon. This repetition of incremental solidification and melt-
`ing is implicated in the development of mierodefects.
`Standard CZ pullers afford limited capability for oxygen control through
`such processes as changing rotation and pull speeds and hot-zone geometry.
`Recently it has been found that oxygen content and crystal striations may be
`reduced significantly by applying a transverse magnetic field to the silicon
`melt area in order to damp the liquid convection currents.‘ Several silicon
`
`
`
`FIG. 2—.\'rAn-mlie reprerenuuon ofnrrll/low pamnu induced by thermal mvrrrt-rim and cru-
`athlr nualion.
`
`'Suruki. 'l‘.. lsawa. N.. Otubo. Y..and Hashi. K. in Seauroadurmr Silicon 1981. II. R. Hall’
`at al. Eds . Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Silicon Materials Science and
`Technology. The Electroelueutieal Society. Pennington. N. J.. l98l.
`
`Raythe0n2018-0005
`-F
`
`
`Raytheon2018-0005
`
`

`
`10
`
`SILICON Pnocsssme
`
`
`
`FIG. 3—Di4i;raiir ofiluumerk flair mini and
`
`rbenld eolmeerloiu.
`
`producers are investigating the effects of this technique. known as magnetic
`CZ (MCZ).
`
`The MC2 effect offers a direct means of regulating oxygen transport and
`temperature transients. In principle. any motion of the highly conductive
`molten silicon is impeded when it crosses the magnetic flux field (Fig. 3).
`This provides a thick. stable boundary layer between the crucible wall and
`the bulk silicon melt. so that oxygen transport is limited to diffusion through
`a stable liquid medium. At the same time. the temperature transients at the
`growth interface are suppressed: the result is a relatively steady instantane-
`ous growth rate.
`
`Courlnuous Liquid-filieon Feed
`
`The concept of continuous liquid-silicon feed (CLF) has been under de-
`velopment for several years. CLF employs a heated qtnrt7 tube to transfer
`liquid silicon from a meltdown chamber to a growth chamber. allowing for
`control of dopant concentration in the feed material. and for semicontinuous
`replenishment of polycrystalline material and crystal solidification. Advan-
`tages include axially uniform crystal properties. improved productivity. and
`decreased crucible and power costs. Individual crystal sizes up to 65 kg have
`been achieved. and the process has shown capability for growing zJero-defect-
`quality material. Operation of the C Li’ system is tedinically complex. how-
`ever. and additional furnace automation is required for production feasibil-
`ity. A schematic representation of a CLF system is shown in Fig. 4.
`
`High-Resistivity cz
`
`Historically. most requirements for resistivities greater than 25 0-cm
`have been filled with material grown by the float-zone
`which uses no
`crucible. Increasing demands for resistivities as high as 70 0-em have re-
`
`Raytheon2018-0006
`
`
`
`..9.Jouuff
`
`Raytheon2018-0006
`
`

`
`BONOBA ON CRYSTAL GROWTH AND PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
`
`11
`
`
`
`FIG. 4—(‘rm.s srrunn o/future inwrpomtntg ronrtmravs Ir‘¢rn'dfrd of.rt'!aimn olvring groi--tit.
`
`ocntly been satisfied with C2 material. Production experience to date indi-
`cates that extra care in doping and charge preparation can lteep yields close
`to levels expected for standard product. provided that high-purity polycrys-
`talline rnatenal is used. General availability of the product may afford addi-
`tional flexibility in the design of high-speed memory devices.
`
`Furnace Automation
`
`To free the crystal growth process from operator judgment. it is desirable
`to have a computer monitor the process status and effect necessary changes.
`Improved furnace mechanical design. coupled with the uniform consistency
`of digital control and new process transducers. will lead to substantial auto-
`mation. and preprogrammed process changes will give better run-to-run
`uniformity.
`Present activities emphasize effective use of linked automation and devel-
`opment of “recipe“ loading systems that will facilitate end-user process de-
`velopment without the need for software and computer system skills. Figure
`5 shows a state-of-the-art computer-controlled furnace.
`
`Crystal Processing
`
`Slicing
`
`Conversion of ground ingots into slices (wafers) is accomplished primarily
`by inside-diameter (ID) diamond sawing. Machine technology has changed
`to accommodate larger ingots as well as new accuracy requirements. Typical
`
`Raytheon2018-0007
`
`Raytheon2018-0007
`
`

`
`-'12
`
`SIUOON PROCESSING
`
`new machines incorporate hydraulitztlly or mechanically tensioned blade
`heads in the 685.6— to 762-mm-diameter range. using blades with 12- and IS-
`mil lterf widths and 203.2- to 254-mm bores. Machine types currently avail-
`able include horizontal and vertical spindles with rollingclement and air-
`bearing construction. All types are successfully in use by leading silicon
`producers. and automatic control-feedback features are becoming available.
`All saws allow adjustment of the ingot axis to permit cutting on the desired
`crystal orientation. Typical productivity figures for I00-mm wafers are 150
`to 23) wafers per 8-h shift. and blade life is in the range of 3500 to 7000 cuts.
`Control of planarity during the slicing process has become critical in the
`last three years. since repeated thermal processing of wafers has been found
`to exaggerate the distortions of wafer bow. Flatness of the polished wafer
`product also is influenced by bow. because the subsequent grinding/lapping
`
`Raytheon2018-0008
`
`Raytheon2018-0008
`
`

`
`eouonn on CRYSTAL Gnown-t mo mocessme TECHNOLOGY
`
`13
`
`
`
`I-16. b—('kur-up View ofll) nrw. skewing atnonnuit Male drnnrgfunve.
`
`processes remove material from bowed wafers in an unpredictable manner.
`Most saws incorporate a means to facilitate bow control by measuring the
`deflection of the blade during each wafer cut.
`Generally. a blade that cuts without lateral deflection will deliver slices
`with minimal “cut-in“ how. but how induced by nonsymmetrical surface
`stresses on opposing laces may still exist. The saw operator normally moni-
`tors both blade deflection and general wafer bow trends. and will correct the
`cutting action by a combination of blade-dressing techniques and blade
`tensioning.
`Figure 6 shows a prototype saw that allows the cut ingot face to be auto-
`matically raised during slicing. This semiautomatic device also allows the
`measurement for cut-in bow. and for initiation of a programmed blade-
`dressing sequence indicated by the direction and magnitude of the bow.
`Another feature that is becoming prevalent is “single-slice recovery".
`wherein a retrieval mechanism recovers each wafer and loads it into a con-
`
`ventional cassette. This feature eliminates drag of the blade on the return
`stroke. with improved safety and ease of operation.
`Wafer slicing and cleaning remain critical first fabrication steps. and a
`wafer with excessive bow. lack of planarity. or work damage crates prob-
`Iems in further processing,
`
`l i I
`
`Raytheon2018-0009
`
`bwin:
`
`Typically. the as-cut slice from an ID saw is not flat enough to meet pol-
`ished slice requirements. and a free-abrasive double-sided machining process
`(lapping) is used to planar-ire both slice surfaces and provide uniform finish.
`
`Raytheon2018-0009
`
`

`
`
`
`.....—......n.r_—.'.:___'51
`
`Some difficttlties associated with edge contouring have included:
`
`1. Loss of diatnetral accuracy.
`2. Rounding of the fill cusps.
`3. Angular shining of the wafer an.
`4. Random sulloping of the wafer edge.
`5. lnsullicient control or top and bottom contours.
`
`grinding. and higlvspeed grinding with a preformed wheel. A common meth-
`od ttsesagrooved wheel rotating at high speed. which isheldauinst thepe-
`riphery of a slowly rotating wafer by a constant-force mechanism. An alter-
`native method (Fig. 7) uses a multistep sequence to wind the outside
`diameter. top edge. and bottom edge on a am-controlled profile grinder.
`Advantages include (I) aecunte final diameter. independent or wafer-statt-
`in; dimensions; (2) accurate primary-flat and secondary-flat generation: and
`(3) independent selection of top and bottom edge contours.
`
`Raytheon2018-0010
`
`Raytheon2018-0010
`
`

`
`15
`
`. . removal rates an 30
`. and more moderate cy-
`- Diflieulties with acid etch-
`xides of nitrogen evolved. operator hazards.
`uniform etch removal which leads to a non-
`
`and a Iendency towards non
`planar wafer surface.
`For these and other reasons. caustic etching in high-lempenlure (70 lo
`
`Raytheon2018-0011
`
`Raytheon2018-0011
`
`

`
`.16
`
`SILIOON FDOCESING
`
`130°C) potassium or sodium hydroxide has become commonplace in the last
`two years. Although time cycles are considerably longer than with acid.
`material removal tends to be more uniform. and the etched wafer flatter.
`Process characteristics are more uniform throughout bath life. and both et-
`chant costs and air pollution are reduced.
`Rinsing is particularly important after caustic etching. and several stages
`of deionized (DI) water rinse may be necessary. 1'he wafer surface tends to
`be grainier or rougher after caustic etch. which leads to occasional problems
`with backside contamination. Residual sodium-potassium contamination
`has not presented problems.
`
`Gerredug
`
`Controlled residual work damage on the backside or at strain sites in the
`silicon lattice acts to “getter" various impurities during thermal processing.
`prevailing their migration upward into active device regions. Common meth-
`ods of introducing controlled backside residual damage include:
`
`1. Abmsiw blesn'ng—-Controlled-diameter particles of alumina or other
`hard material are directed at high velocity against the wafer backside in a
`process similar to sandblasting.
`2. laser beam—A small-diameter focused laser pulse of appropriate
`wavelength and energy strikes the surface and creates localized melting or
`material removal. A matrix of damage sites in the desired pattern is achieved
`by repeated pulsing.
`3. Direct surface abrtm'on—‘l1te wafer is rotated on a vacuum chuclt and
`an abrasive-coated cloth or paper is moved radially in point or line contact
`with the wafer. leaving a series of concentric damage sites.
`4. Liquid ltontrtg—A high-velocity stream of liquid containing abrasive
`particles is traversed across the wafer backside.
`
`In all systems of this type. major considerations are uniformity of damage
`depth and freedom from residual contamination. In addition. certain dam-
`age processes leave deep fissures which tend to pick up contaminants that
`cannot be easily detected or cleaned. and which dilfuse through the wafer at
`subsequent steps. These processes all have different characteristics in terms
`of damage intensity and ease with which damage sites anneal out and lose
`effectiveness.
`
`A variety of thermal and chemical means are also available to improve
`gettering. One technique involves processing a wafer in a manner so as to
`achieve a sharp gradient of oxygen concentration at the polished surface.
`thus creating a “denuded zone“ which contrasts with relatively high oxygen
`content in the bulk of the wafer. Other techniques to achieve oxygen gra-
`dients are being explored experimentally. The concept of the silicon wafer
`
`Raytheon2018-0012
`
`
`
`Raytheon2018-0012
`
`

`
`BONORA ON CRYSTAL GROWTH AND PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
`
`17
`
`substrate as a homogeneous entity. polished on one side. is rapidly giving
`way to the recognition that many desirable properties can be deliberately
`and methodically created.
`Introduction of bacltsurfaoe gcttering is normally done following the etch-
`ing operation. and rigorous cleaning is necessary prior to polishing.
`
`Intermediate Wafer Inspection
`
`After the slice/lap/etch operations. integrated automatic equipment (Fig.
`8) is used to inspect and sort the wafers for resistivity. thiclcna. how. flat-
`ness. and surface appearance. Visual inspection of as-etched wafer surfaces is
`performed to check for etch stains. residual saw marks. flakes and chips.
`edge contour. and uniformity of appearance- Although this operation relies
`heavily on human visual skill and judgment. automatic wafer-handling
`equipment can assure consistency of wafer inspection time and viewing con-
`ditions. Automatic handling also eliminates wafer breakage and chipping
`which occur with coin stacking and with tweezer or vacuum pencil pickup.
`
`Laser Marking
`
`The concept of using a focused laser beam to create alphanumeric or bar
`code identifiation marks on wafers has been in the embryonic stage since
`I975. Commercial equipment with good production capability is awtilable
`from several manufacturers. and some silicon producers are shipping pilot
`quantities of marked wafers. Despite adoption of the Semiconductor
`
`
`
`FIG. 8—l’¢rnw view of rr.st’rn‘vi’I_v/chicken: mm-r. rnzwpomung 24 rrreflrr notions.
`
`_—-—:—jj ‘
`
`Raytheon2018-0013
`
`
`
`Raytheon2018-0013
`
`

`
`Equipment and Materials Institute (SEMI) standard and universal recogni-
`tion that an identification code is desirable. the transition to widespmd use
`is slow because of the many challenges involved in effectively utilizing code
`information.
`
`The marking performed by the silicon manufacturer is normally done as
`pan of. or after. slice sorting. because the correct resistivity will be known at
`that point. Laser marking may raise a entered edge and leave slag on the
`slice surface. and the producer may prefer to mark prior to etching. particu-
`larlyifthemarltistobeon the waterbackside. lntllis¢v¢IIl.Ihesortingsteps
`are repeated prior to polishing.
`During the next several years. it can be expected that equipment manufac-
`turers and device line planners will integrate the use of marked information
`into an overall concept to aid process control and material flow. This ambi-
`tious undertaking will involve the availability of highly reliable code readers
`and wafer-bulfering systems. Truly hands-oil’ material flow in both silicon
`and device plants will require production control systems with computer-
`controllcd feedback to regulate processes and to allow for equipment down-
`time and nonuniform production rates in some operations. Multipurpose
`cassette-type wafer handlers (Fig. 9) probably will be utilized for transient
`inventory (bttffering) as well as for machine loading.
`
`Polirlrlng
`
`For almost two decades. one-sided water polishing has been accomplished
`by caustic colloidal-silica slurry and a rotating pad for stock removal (10 to
`
`
`
`-‘E
`
`l I
`
`i
`
`s.
`
`Raytheon2018-0014
`
` :
`
`Raytheon2018-0014
`
`

`
`aoucmt on CRYSTAL cnawm mo mocessmc recmotoev
`
`19
`
`N um) followed by finishirtg—a two-step chemical-mechaniral syseem de-
`sip:edIoprodnoeahidIlyreflectiveplanarsnrl'aoe.I'reefrom subsurface
`work damage. haze. and microscrarches. Traditional wax-mounting or rain-
`mounting techniques are prone to leave dimples. wave, or surface contami-
`nation, and are being replaced by templates. surface tension. friction, and
`solidlilm bonding. ‘fhesetvaxlesrnountingprocesseshave irnprovedyielfi
`andreducod prooessingeostabutindustry-wideflatnesspoalstornonlinear
`thickness variation remain a clnllenge.
`Flatness requirements are the major driving force and the figure of merit
`for developing polishing technology. Improvements in flatns continue. and
`wafers currently can be produced to is than 3-gun TIR (peak-to-pak total
`indicated reading).'lhecomp|etespectrnmofrequirementsl'orpolished
`wafer quality dictates a highlyengineered system lodeliversatisfactory re»
`sults. Important polished-wafer parameters such as flatness, taper.and qual-
`ity of surface finish are primarily affected by:
`
`l. Composition. flow rate. radial distribution. and temperature of the
`slurry.
`2. Surface speed. temperature distribution. relative diameters. filidity.
`and geometrical contours of the main platen and carriers.
`3. Materials and procedures for wafer mounting.
`4. Comprmsibility and slurry retention of polish pads.
`5. Unit content pressure. cycle times. rinse sequence. and ambient conditions.
`
`The majority of equipment sold today (whether wax or waxlm) uses mul-
`tiple mounting of wafers on acarrier. with variations between manufacturers
`based on the number. type.and size ofcarriers. A commonly used polishing
`machine (Fig. 10) uses four motor-driven carriers. each of which Inndlcs
`seven I00-mm wafers. The main platen for the polishing pad is driven by a
`M-hp motor. and a typical stock removal cycle is ID to 20 min. A similar ma-
`chine. with dilferent pad and run conditions. would be used for finish polish-
`ing in a l- to 5-rnin cycle.
`Automation of nmltiwafer polishing currently focuses on handling and
`loading of wafers onto the carrier. and on demounting. 11:: machine shown
`in Fig. I0 uses a medium-pressure pulsed jet of DI water to demount waters
`at the rate of 2 s per wafer.
`
`Wder Cleaning
`
`The demounted wafers go through precleaning and final cleaning steps.
`The preclean proees is matched to the characteristics of the polishing system
`(wax or tvaxless). When the wafer is removed from preclean. its surface is
`either entirely hydrophilic or hydrophobic. depending on the presence or ab-
`sence of an oxide film on the polished silicon surface. Since the prccleaning is
`
`Raytheon2018-0015
`
`
`
`Raytheon2018-0015
`
`

`
`generally the last‘ cleaning step for the wafer backside. it is important to use
`no chemicals having nonvolatile residues and to control water purity for
`rinsing.
`Final cleaning generally is accomplished on automated wafer scrubbers in
`a clean-room atmosphere. It entails sequential chemical scrubs. rinsing. and
`spin drying.
`
`Finn! Inspection
`
`A rigorous final inspection. in many cases at a lw% level. is performed
`following final cleaning. Parameters to be checked visually include particu-
`lates. haze. stains, waves. and backside cleanliness. In addition. a sample-
`level check is run on measurable parameters. including how. flatness. resis-
`tivity/thiclmess/type. flat length and position. oxygen and carbon content.
`swirl level. and gcttering effect.
`
`Raytheon2018-0016
`
`Raytheon2018-0016
`
`

`
`BONOHA ON CRYSTAL GROW?!-l AND PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
`
`21
`
`
`
`FIG. ll-Gmertrl-pwruu insprrlfon rlaviowfar inisutl Jdcflion of Ivqfiv-lltrfow qtinh'I_i'.
`
`‘Die visual inspection requires experienced production personnel and is
`generally subjective. To diminish subjectivity. etforts are being made to auto-
`mate portions of the process by the use of an incident-angle laser beam scan
`for detecting particulates. haze. and stains.
`Mechanized handling (Fig. ll) is being introduced in a variety of inspec-
`tion operations to ensure consistency of inspection conditions and to reduce
`contamination and breakage.
`Flatness measurement is of special interest because it has a major influ-
`ence on the practical limits for shrinking line widths and increasing circuit
`complexity. The depth of field of optimum yield/pattem definition in protec-
`tion alignment is small. and therefore the degree of precision in predicting
`the surface plane of the wafer directly affects the entire photolitliographic
`process.
`
`In the area of flatness inspection. several different types of equipment are
`in use. each with substantially different principles of measurement:
`
`l. Grazing-angle laser inter'ferometr)' with fixed wafer and chuck.
`2. Ultrasonic probe with spiral scan and mechanical wafer rotation.
`3. Multipoint capacitance probe with fixed wafer.
`4. Single-axis laser scan with mechanical wafer rotation.
`5. Multipoint optical probes with mechanical wafer traverse.
`
`An additional measurement system has been introduced recently that ex-
`pands flatness mcasuremen: to include a new paraineter—loca! slope. ‘Ibis
`
`Raytheon2018-0017
`
`
`
`Raytheon2018-0017
`
`

`
`22
`
`SILICON PROCESSING
`
`FIG. l2-—Su;(«r are-ustrrrtmat system that employ: tr laser-been seat. ¢'i.rple,t-r tr mundan-
`rxuwl Iopogrqpltird readout. andedcttlaaa percentage ofu no/er rlur near 0 rperitielflamest
`rutttdanf.
`
`system (Fig. I2) uses a two-dimensional laser scan with a solid-state sensor
`to determine the angular deviation of the reflected beam. In effect. slope is
`measured directly. with conventional flatness data obtained by the digital in-
`tegration of slope data over distance traversed. In this manner. complete sur-
`face topology is obtained. Tests indiatte reliable operation with both pol-
`ished and patterned wafers.
`The issue of slope-flatness measurement on wafers after several thermal
`processing steps may be of interest. since thermally induced distortion can
`become severe enough to prevent total wafer pulldown on a vacuum chuck.
`Thus a wafer may be perfectly flat at incoming inspection and fail in subse~
`quent lithography steps owing to laelt of flatness.
`A tendency towards thermal distortion is a material variable influenced by
`intrinsic oxygen. grown-in stresses. and backside treatment. as well as by
`oxidation/diffusion temperatures and push/pull rates.
`The interactive effects between silicon wafer manufacturing proctsses and
`device line performance typify the complex issues facing wafer manufacturers
`and users. It is apparent that technology etforts are expanding in the devel-
`opment of silicon materials. New material parameters likely to be studied for
`possible effects on device yield and performance include:
`
`I. Interstitial oxygen (including thickness gradient effects).
`
`Raytheon2018-0018
`
`
`
`Raytheon2018-0018
`
`

`
`aoNoaA on cnvsm. Gaovm-t mo mocessmo 1'EcotNot.ocv
`
`23
`
`2. Nondoplnt tnoo-metal content.
`,3. Nonvistnl surface-state conditions.
`.4. Residual lattice stress.
`
`5. Qrbon. precipitate formation, and point defect distribution.
`6. State of oxygen in the lattice.
`'
`
`Control or that factors may in tum contribute to the dcvolopmeot of nevi-
`.paeration semiconductor end-products.
`
`Raytheon2018-0019
`
`Raytheon2018-0019

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket