throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS
`INC., BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., AND ALEMBIC
`PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.,
`
`Petitioners,
`
`RESEARCH CORPORATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case No. IPRZO16-002041
`
`Patent No. RE 38,551
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF OFFICE ACTION
`
`IN CO-PENDING EX PARTE REEXAMINATION
`
`1 Case IPR2016—O1101, Case IPR2016—01242, and Case IPR2016—01245 have been
`
`joined with this proceeding.
`
`DC: 62932524
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`Further to the Board’s Decision Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate
`
`(Paper 42), Patent Owner
`
`files herewith an Office Action in Ex Parte
`
`Reexamination dated December 5, 2016 that issued in co-pending reexamination
`
`Control No. 90/013,709 (EX. 2192). The office action makes the following claim
`
`rejections. Rejections (1) and (2) are the same as instituted Grounds 3A and 3B.
`
`(1) Claims 1-9 ofthe ’551 Patent are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
`
`Kohn 1991 and Silvermang
`
`(2) Claims 10-13 of the ’551 Patent are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`over Kohn 1991, Silverman, and U.S. Patent No. 5,378,729;
`
`(3) Claims 1-9 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting
`
`as unpatentable over claim 45 of U.S. Patent No. 5,654, 301 in View of Kohn 1991
`
`and the ‘729 patent;
`
`(4) Claim 10 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as
`
`unpatentable over claim 46 of U.S. Patent No. 5,654, 301 in View of Kohn 1991
`
`and the ‘729 patent; and
`
`(5) Claims 11-—13 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting
`
`as unpatentable over claim 47 of U.S. Patent No. 5,654, 301 in View of Kohn 1991
`
`and the ‘729 patent.
`
`

`
`
`Date: December 7 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`
`
`Andrea G. Reistei
`Registration No.: 36,253
`Jennifer L. Robbins
`
`Registration No.2 61,163
`
`Enrique D. Longton
`
`Registration No.: 47,304
`
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`
`One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW
`
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`(202) 662-6000
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant
`
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6,
`
`I hereby certify that on this 7th day of
`
`December 2016, the foregoing Patent Owner’s Notice of Office Action in Co-
`
`Pending Ex Parte Reexamination was served by electronic mail, by agreement of
`
`the parties, on the following counsel of record for Petitioners.
`
`PETITIONER (IPR2016—00204)
`Matthew J . Dowd (mjdowd@dowdpllc.com)
`DOWD PLLC
`
`William G. Jenks (wjenks@jenksiplaw.com)
`JENKS IP LAW
`
`PETITIONER (IPRZO16-01101)
`Steven W. Parmelee (sparmelee@wsgr.com)
`Michael T. Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Jad A. Mills (jmills@wsgr.com)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`PETITIONER (IPR2016-Ol242)
`Matthew L. Fedowitz (mfedowitz@merchantgould.com)
`Daniel R. Evans (devans@merChantgould.com)
`MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
`
`PETITIONER (IPR20l6—Ol245)
`Gary J . Speier (gspeier@carlsoncaspers.com)
`Jeffer Ali (jali@carlsoncaspers.com)
`CARLSON, CASPERS, VANDENBURGH, LINDQUIST & SCI/I/UMN, P.A.
`s’
`
`
`i'.....»::i2‘./2? ‘C7
`Andrea G. Rye/igster, Esq.
`Reg. No.: 36,253
`
`Date: December 7, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket