`
`Lacosamide Induced Psychosis: Case Report, Review of Differential Diagnosis and Relevant Pharmacokinetics. - PubMed - NCBI
`
`PubMed
`
`Format: Abstract
`
`Full text links
`
`Clin Neuropharmacol. 2015 Sep-Oct;38(5):198-200. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000097.
`Lacosamide Induced Psychosis: Case Report, Review of Differential
`Diagnosis and Relevant Pharmacokinetics.
`1
`Pinkhasov A , Lam T, Hayes D, Friedman M, Singh D, Cohen H.
`Author information
`
`Abstract
`Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic medication used as an adjunctive treatment for partial
`seizures. Psychosis associated with LCM use is a rarely documented phenomenon, which may be
`difficult to detect in the context of the often complicated clinical presentation of epilepsy. We report
`the development of psychosis in a young woman after the use of LCM, which subsequently resolved
`with its discontinuation. The possible differential diagnosis and pharmacokinetic nuances are
`discussed. This is the first case report of LCM-induced psychosis in the United States.
`
`PMID: 26366962 DOI: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000097
`[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
`
`Publication Types, MeSH Terms, Substances
`
`LinkOut - more resources
`
`PubMed Commons
`
`0 comments
`
`PubMed Commons home
`
`How to join PubMed Commons
`
`https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366962
`
`1/1
`
`ARGENTUM Exhibit 1133
` Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2016-00204
`
`Page 00001
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
