throbber
UCB Heralds Successor to Keppra as EU Approves Vimpat for Epilepsy (cid:9)
`
`10/12/16, 2:45 PM
`
`Otniseralds Successor to Keppra
`as EU Approves Vimpat for Epilepsy
`
`Published: 9/3/2008
`Subscribe I Archives
`
`The approval marks an important step on the road to rebuilding
`UCB's fortunes, but a regulatory nod from the United States will
`prove to be even more critical.
`
`Related Content
`Healthcare & Pharma
`Industry Analysis
`
`Global Insight Perspective
`
`Significance
`
`Implications
`
`The European Commission
`has approved UCB's drug
`Vimpat (lacosamide) as an
`adjunctive treatment for
`partial-onset seizures with or
`without secondary
`generalisation in epilepsy
`patients aged 16 or over.
`
`The approval is the first
`regulatory green light for
`Vimpat, which UCB has
`developed as a follow-on to
`current blockbuster Keppra
`(levetiracetam). UCB is still
`awaiting a decision on
`marketing from the FDA in the
`United States.
`
`ARGENTUM Exhibit 1080
` Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2016-00204
`
`Outlook Keppra's U.S. patent will
`
`https://www.ihs.com/country-industry-forecasting.html?1D=106596415
`
`I147-1-714410
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Page 00001
`
`

`
`UCB Heralds Successor to Keppra as EU Approves Vimpat for Epilepsy (cid:9)
`
`10/12/16, 2:45/PM
`
`expire next year, and Vimpat's
`success in both the United
`States and Europe will be
`crucial to UCB's fortunes in
`years to come. The drug faces
`stiff competition, however,
`from the likes of Lamictal,
`Lyrica and Topamax, and UCB
`will need to invest in proving
`Vimpat's therapeutic
`advantages over these rivals.
`
`EU Green Light for Vimpat
`
`The European Commission has granted marketing approval to
`Vimpat (lacosamide), produced by Belgian drug-maker UCB, as an
`adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures with or without
`secondary generalisation in patients aged 16 and above. The
`approval comes just over two months after a committee from the
`European Medicines Agency (EMEA) gave its support for the drug,
`and therefore has not come as a surprise. Vimpat will now be
`available across the European Union (EU) in several doses and
`formulations, which UCB says will offer patients a broader range of
`dosage options:
`
`• Oral tablets (50, 100, 150 or 200 mg)
`• Oral syrup (15 mg/mL)
`• Solution for infusion (10 mg/mL)
`
`Vimpat's imminent European launch will see the drug prescribed in
`tandem with at least one other epilepsy treatment, as its approval
`was based on clinical trials which examined Vimpat's use in patients
`whose partial-onset seizures were not adequately controlled with
`between one and three other epilepsy medicines. UCB's existing
`epilepsy blockbuster Keppra (levetiracetam) is also approved for
`adjunctive treatment, and saw blockbuster sales of just over 1 billion
`euro (US$1.5 billion)—up 43% year-on-year in comparable terms—
`in 2007. Keppra is due to lose patent protection in the United States
`next year, and UCB has already filed regulatory applications with the
`U.S. FDA, seeking marketing approval for Vimpat as an adjunctive
`epilepsy therapy as well as a treatment for diabetic neuropathic
`pain. The Belgian pharma giant also sought European marketing
`approval for Vimpat in this second indication back in August 2007,
`and is currently awaiting a verdict from the EMEA.
`
`Outlook and Implications
`
`https://www.ihs.com/country-industry-forecasting.html?ID=106596415 (cid:9)
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Page 00002
`
`

`
`UCI3 Heralds Successor to Keppra as EU Approves Vimpat for Epilepsy (cid:9)
`
`10/12/16, 2:45 PM
`
`European marketing approval for Vimpat in the most potentially
`lucrative of its two developed indications is a much-needed sign of
`encouragement for UCB, which recently revealed plans to axe 17%
`of its staff in order to optimise costs at a time of financial uncertainty
`(see Belgium: 28 August 2008: UCB Unveils SHAPE
`Restructuring Programme, Prepares to Downsize 17% of Staff).
`What the company needs now is for the U.S. FDA to follow suit and
`approve Vimpat for epilepsy in the United States, where UCB stands
`to lose revenue most heavily once Keppra's patent protection
`expires.
`
`In the past, UCB has said that between 20-30% of epileptic patients,
`equivalent to 10-15 million people globally, are inadequately treated
`by existing epilepsy treatments, offering a potentially large patient
`population that could benefit from Vimpat. However, the treatment
`will be competing against other well-established adjunctive epilepsy
`drugs, including Lamictal (lamotigrine; GlaxoSmithKline, U.K.),
`Topamax (topamirate; Johnson & Johnson, U.S.), and Neurontin
`(gabapentin; Pfizer, U.S.). On the U.S. market, Vimpat will also be
`competing against Pfizer's formidable blockbuster Lyrica
`(pregabalin), which has been approved as an adjunctive treatment
`for partial-onset seizures in adult epilepsy patients since 2005.
`
`In order to make Vimpat stand out from rival products, UCB will
`need to employ aggressive marketing tactics, but will also need to
`invest in further studies examining the drug's unique mode of action.
`UCB claims that Vimpat has shown to modulate the activity of
`sodium channels—which help regulate activity in the nervous
`system—differently to other epilepsy drugs, and that it is the only
`epilepsy treatment known to bind to the collapsing response
`mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2). How this distinguishes Vimpat in
`terms of therapeutic effect is not yet fully understood, but
`demonstrating this through further clinical trials could help improve
`the drug's fortunes in years to come.
`
`Subscribe I Archives
`
`IHS Markit'
`
`Copyright ©2016 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved
`
`https://www.ihs.comicountry-industry-forecasting.html?10.106596415
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Page 00003
`
`(cid:9)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket