throbber
REVIEW ARTICLE
`
`Newer Anti-epileptic Drugs
`
`SATINDER ANEJA AND SUVASINI SHARMA
`From Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College and associated Kalawati Saran Childrens Hospital, New Delhi,
`India.
`Correspondence to: Dr Satinder Aneja, Director Professor and Head, Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College
`and associated Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital, New Delhi, India. drsaneja@gmail.com
`
`Need and Purpose of review:A number of newer anti-epileptic drugs have been developed in the last few years to improve the treatment
`outcomes in epilepsy. In this review, we discuss the use of newer anti-epileptic drugs in children.
`Methods used for locating, selecting, extracting and synthesizing data: MEDLINE search (1966-2013) was performed using terms
`"newer anti-epileptic drugs", "Oxcarbazepine", vigabatrin", topiramate", "zonisamide", "levetiracetam", "lacosamide", "rufinamide",
`"stiripentol", "retigabine", "eslicarbazepine", "brivaracetam", "ganaxolone" and "perampanel" for reports on use in children. Review
`articles, practice parameters, guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case
`series were included. The main data extracted included indications, efficacy and adverse effects in children.
`Main conclusions: Oxcarbazepine is established as effective initial monotherapy for children with partial-onset seizures. Vigabatrin is
`the drug of choice for infantile spasms associated with tuberous sclerosis. Lamotrigine , levetiracetam and lacosamide are good add-on
`drugs for patients with partial seizures. Lamotrigine may be considered as monotherapy in adolescent females with idiopathic generalized
`epilepsy. Levetiracetam is a good option as monotherapy for females with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Topiramate is a good add-on drug
`in patients with epileptic encephalopathies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and myoclonic astatic epilepsy.
`Keywords: Refractory epilepsy; Epileptic encephalopathies; Oxcarbazepine; Vigabatrin; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam.
`
`About 65% of children with newly diagnosed
`
`epilepsy achieve sustained freedom from
`seizures with the initially prescribed
`ntiepileptic drug (AED). An additional 15-
`20% become seizure free with subsequently prescribed
`AEDs, while the remainder cannot achieve seizure
`control with available medications. There is an unmet
`need for efficacious AED with good safety profile in this
`group, and there is a continued research in this field for
`an ideal AED. After the introduction of sodium
`valproate in 1967, there was hiatus of two decades after
`which ten new AEDs were launched during the so called
`"decade of Brains". These expanded the armamentarium
`of therapeutics for intractable epilepsy.
`These newer AEDs are used as an adjunct to
`conventional AEDs in children with intractable epilepsy.
`However, more studies are required to evaluate their use as
`first line AED for children with epilepsy. These newer
`drugs are more efficacious and have a better safety as
`compared to conventional AED. However, caution must
`be exercised for possible drug interactions with
`conventional AEDs before using them as an adjunct.
`Moreover, many of these newer AEDs have been recently
`launched in Indian market and cost of some them are
`largely prohibitive.
`
`Intractable epilepsy refractory to appropriate
`conventional AED is an indication for the newer drugs.
`Among children presenting with refractory epilepsy, one
`must always look for causes of psuedointractability
`including possibility of non epileptic event, misdiagnosis
`of seizure type, and wrong choice of conventional AEDs.
`These causes must always be thought before using newer
`AEDs as an adjunct.
`
`These medications should be prescribed by
`pediatricians with an in-depth knowledge of the
`pharmacokinetics of the drug, its indications, dosage, side
`effects and possible drug interactions. The present review
`intends to provide an insight to these aspects of use of
`antiepileptic drugs. We discuss the pediatric use of newer
`anti-epileptic drugs, both the ones which are already in the
`market (lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam,
`oxcarbazepine, zonisamide, vigabatrin, lacosamide,
`eslicarbazepine), and the newer ones in development and
`which are likely to be available soon (rufmamide,
`stiripentol, retigabine, brivaracetam, ganaxolone, and
`perampanel). The use of gabapentin and pregabalin will
`not be discussed in this review as these are used
`predominantly for the management of neuropathic pain,
`and not epilepsy.
`
`INDIAN PEDIATRICS
`
`1033 (cid:9)
`
`VOLUME 50—NOVEMBER 15, 2013
`
`ARGENTUM Exhibit 1058
` Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2016-00204
`
`Page 00001
`
`

`
`ANEJA AND SHARMA (cid:9)
`
`NEWER ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`THE NEWER ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`consider stopping the drug after 6 months.
`
`Vigabatrin
`
`Levetiracetam
`
`Vigabatrin is a structural analogue of gamma-
`aminobutyric acid (GABA), which irreversibly inhibits
`the enzyme GABA transaminase.
`Indications: It is used as a first line drug for treatment of
`infantile spasms in children with tuberous sclerosis [1].
`As there is insufficient evidence for the use of other AEDs
`in infantile spasms [2], it may be considered as a first line
`treatment in other patients with infantile spasms in whom
`the use of hormonal treatment (corticosteroids, ACTH) is
`contraindicated.
`Efficacy: Clinical trials have shown that spasm cessation
`is greatest in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex
`(74%) compared with other symptomatic etiologies
`(50%) [3]. In a large randomized controlled trial, it was
`shown that hormonal treatment (ACTH and
`prednisolone) was associated with better outcome at 2
`weeks (73%) when compared to vigabatrin (54%) [4].
`Advantages: It has good oral bioavailablity and the drug
`is excreted unchanged by kidney. Drug interactions are
`minimal with conventional AEDs.
`Side effects: The major concern with the use of vigabatrin
`is the development of bilateral concentric peripheral
`visual field constriction, which has been seen in one third
`of adults and 20% of children treated with vigabatrin [5].
`Because of the difficulties and inconsistencies with
`formal visual field testing in young infants and children,
`visual fields in children have been tested using highly
`sensitive electroretinograms. The earliest finding of the
`first abnormal field examination in adults was after 9
`months of treatment; in children, the earliest sustained
`onset of the vigabatrin induced retinal defect in infants
`was 3.1 months [6]. Most patients with abnormalities
`received treatment for at least 6 months, and even those
`treated for more than 2 years have been reported to have
`stable visual fields [7]. As infantile spasms comprise a
`severe epileptic encephalopathy with poor develop-
`mental outcome if uncontrolled, the risks and benefits
`should be weighed before starting vigabatrin treatment.
`Myoclonic seizures and abscence seizures are known to
`be precipitated by vigabatrin.
`Dosage: Pediatric doses range from 50 mg/kg/day to 150
`mg/ kg/day [8]. The dose may be increased by 30-40 mg/
`kg/day every 4-5 days till the maximum dose is reached.
`The time to response with vigabatrin is quite short,
`usually within 2 weeks. If the infant has not shown
`improvement in spasms within 2 weeks, vigabatrin
`should be discontinued [9]. In infants with good response
`
`Levetiracetam is a broad spectrum AED which
`selectively inhibits high-voltage-activated calcium
`channels and reduces calcium release from intraneuronal
`stores [10]. It also binds to a specific target in the brain,
`the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), an integral
`membrane glycoprotein, which is involved in the control
`of vesicle fusion and exocytosis.
`Indications: Levetiracetam is effective as adjunctive
`therapy in pediatric patients with partial onset seizures
`and in primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures [II].
`Intravenous preparation has recently shown efficacy in
`neonatal seizures [12] and status epilepticus [13].
`Efficacy: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
`controlled, multicenter trial in 101 children with
`refractory partial seizures, >50% seizure reductions was
`seen in 44.6% receiving levetiracetam and 19.6% in
`patients receiving placebo [14]. Levetiracetam has been
`evaluated in childhood epilepsy syndromes including
`rolandic epilepsy [15], electrical status epilepticus in
`slow sleep, myoclonic and tonic clonic seizures of
`Lennox Gastaut syndrome [16] and as an alternative to
`valproate in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in adolescent
`girls [17]. Beneficial effects on language development
`have been reported [18].
`
`Advantages: Levetiracetam has a favourable
`pharmacokinetic profile in terms of safety inpatients with
`liver disease and minimal drug interaction with other
`AEDs.
`Side effect: Levetiracetam is well tolerated in children
`with minor adverse events like headache, anorexia, and
`somnolence. However, there are concerns of behavioural
`side effects like aggression, emotional lability,
`oppositional behavior, and psychosis in children [19].
`Dosage: Pediatric dose start from 10 mg/kg/day (divided
`tweice daily) to be hiked by 10-20 mg/kg every two
`weeks to a maximum dose of 40-60 mg/kg/day.
`
`Topiramate
`
`Topiramate is a sulphamate substituted monosaccharide,
`a broad spectrum AED acting on voltage dependent
`sodium channels, enhancement of GABA, decrease in
`glutamate and inhibition of carbonic anhydrase.
`Indications: Topiramate is a useful adjunct in refractory
`partial or generalized epilepsy and other epileptic
`syndromes.
`Efficacy: Topiramate has demonstrated efficacy as an
`
`INDIAN PEDIATRICS
`
`1034 (cid:9)
`
`VOLUME 50—NOVEMBER 15, 2013
`
`Page 00002
`
`(cid:9)
`

`
`ANEJA AND SHARMA (cid:9)
`
`NEWER ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`adjuctive therapy in partial epilepsy [20], intractable
`epilepsy [21], Lennox Gastaut syndrome [22], infantile
`spasms [23], generalized epilepsy of infancy and
`myoclonic—astatic epilepsy [24]. Pooled data from two
`randomized, double-blind studies found that topiramate
`adjunctive therapy may be efficacious for juvenile
`myoclonic seizures in adults and children [25].
`
`Side effects: Topiramate has good safety with no evidence
`of life threatening adverse effects or organ toxicity. The
`most frequently reported side effects are dizziness,
`mental slowing, somnolence, ataxia, impaired
`concentration and confusion [24]. Most of these are
`transient and observed during the initial weeks of therapy
`and can be reduced by slow titration of the dose. Anorexia
`and mild weight loss has been observed during the
`therapy. Other reported side effects include metabolic
`acidosis, nephrolithiasis, decreased sweating and
`resultant hyperthennia [26]. Children on combination of
`topiramate and valproate should be monitored for signs
`of encephalopathy resulting from hyperammonemia [27].
`
`Dosage: Pediatric dosage is 1-3 mg/kg/day (divided
`twice daily) hiked bi-weekly to 3-8 mg/kg/day.
`
`Lamotrigine
`
`Lamotrigine is another broad spectrum AED which acts
`by blocking the voltage dependent sodium channels and
`thus blocks the release of glutamate through stabilization
`of presynaptic membrane. Enzyme inducing drugs like
`phenytoin and carbamazepine may shorten the half life of
`Lamotrigine.
`
`Indications and efficacy: It is an effective adjunct to
`refractory partial and generalized epilepsy [28]. It is
`particularly useful in typical and atypical absence seizure
`in Lennox Gastaut syndrome and in children with
`myoclonic-astatic epilepsy [22, 29]. It is also useful as a
`first line agent in children with idiopathic generalized
`epilepsy.
`
`Side effects: Common dose related side effectsinclude
`somnolence, sleep disturbances, dizziness, diplopia,
`ataxia, nausea and vomiting. Serious side effects of
`lamotrigine which often require drug withdrawls include
`skin rash and rarely Steven Johnson syndrome and toxic
`epidermal necrolysis [30]. The neurotoxicity and skin
`rash is more often seen when lamotrigine is administered
`with valproate or when the dose is titrated rapidly.
`Lamotrigine may exacerbate myoclonic seizures in
`patients with Dravet syndrome [31].
`
`valproate as the latter prolongs the half life of
`lamotrigine.
`
`Oxcarbazepine
`
`Oxcarbazepine is the 10-keto analogue of carbamazepine
`which blocks high frequency voltage dependent
`repetitive firing of sodium channels.
`
`Indications and efficacy: Oxcarbazepine is used as first
`line drug for partial and secondarily generalized seizures
`[32]. Amongst the newer AED, oxcarbazepine is
`established as evidence-based effective initial
`monotherapy for children with partial-onset seizures and
`focal epilepsy.
`
`Side effects: Unlike carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine is not
`metabolized to epoxide derivative thus minimizing side
`effects like skin rash encountered with carbamazepine.
`Reported side effects of oxcarbazepine include
`hyponatremia, headache, dizziness, and ataxia [33]. The
`advantage of oxcarbazepine over carbamazepine is that it
`does not cause hepatic induction nor does it undergo
`auto-induction [33].
`
`Dosage: Oxcarbazepine can be started with initial dose of
`5 to 8 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses increasing by 5 to 8
`mg/kg after 5 to 7 days up to a maximum of 30 mg/kg.
`The usual effective dose ranges from 10 to 30 mg/kg/day.
`Zonisamide
`
`Zonisamide is a sulphonamide derivative, a broad
`spectrum AED that acts through multiple actions:
`facilitation of dopaminergic and serotoninergic
`neurotransmission through the blockade of T-type
`calcium channels, prolongation of sodium channel
`inactivation and as a weak inhibitor of carbonic
`anhydrase.
`
`Indications: Zonisamide has also been found useful in
`progressive myoclonic epilepsy syndromes such as
`Unverricht-Lundborg disease and Lafora body disease
`[36]. Useful as a second-line agent for infantile spasms,
`Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and juvenile myoclonic
`epilepsy [35].
`
`Side effects: Somnolence, poor appetite, weight loss,
`headache, pruritus, and skin rash are commonly observed
`adverse effects [37]. Other rare side effects include
`kidney stones, oligohydrosis and hyperthennia [38].
`Higher doses (6-8 mg/kg) has been associated with
`problems of language development like vocabulary
`acquisition [39].
`
`Dosage: Lamotrgine is started at 1-2 mg/kg followed by
`slow hiking biweekly to 3-8 mg/kg/day. The drug dosage
`is reduced to half when used in combination with
`
`Dosage: The usual starting dose is 2-4 mg/kg/day, and
`the maintenance dose is 4-8 mg/kg/day;divided once or
`twice daily.
`
`INDIAN PEDIATRICS (cid:9)
`
`1035 (cid:9)
`
`VOLUME 50—NOVEMBER 15, 2013
`
`Page 00003
`
`

`
`ANEJA AND SHARMA
`
`Lacosamide
`
`Lacosamide is a functionalized amino acid that
`selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated
`sodium channels, increasing the proportion of sodium
`channels unavailable for depolarization.
`Indication: Lacosamide is used in children with
`refractory epilepsy with 30-50% of children having more
`than 50% reduction in seizure frequency [40].
`Efficacy: Lacosamide is available in both oral and as an
`injection for intravenous preparation, which may have a
`role in status epilepticus. Pediatric experience with
`lacosamide has been limited [40]. Most of the available
`literature are retrospective data on small number of
`patients with an efficacy rate of 30-50% [41-43].
`Side effect: Lacosamide is generally well tolerated with
`reports of irritability, oral tics, and prolonged crying as
`adverse effects in children [40].
`
`Rufinamide
`
`Rufinamide is a triazole derivative that was approved by
`FDA in 2008 for adjunctive use in the treatment of
`seizures associated with Lennox—Gastaut syndrome in
`children aged above 4 years [44]. Its mechanism of action
`is not completely understood but it is believed to work by
`prolonging the inactive state of sodium channels and
`therefore limiting excessive firing of sodium-dependent
`action potentials.
`Indication: The only approved indication in children (>4
`yrs) is with refractory Lennox Gastaut syndrome].
`Efficacy: In Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, rufinamide was
`studied in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group,
`placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in patients aged 4 to
`37 years with multiple seizure types [45]. At the end of 12
`weeks of therapy, median total seizure frequency was
`decreased by 32.7% in the rufinamide group compared to
`11.7% in the placebo group. Rufinamide has
`demonstrated efficacy in partial onset seizures in older
`adolescents and adults [46]. Rufinamide has also been
`evaluated in a prospective study for the treatment of
`refractory partial onset seizure and childhood onset
`refractory epileptic encephalopathy [47, 48].
`Side effect: The most commonly observed adverse are
`headache, dizziness, fatigue, somnolence, and nausea.
`
`Stiripentol
`
`Stiripentol is an AED used as an adjunctive to clobazam
`and valproate in the treatment of refractory generalized
`tonic-clonic seizures in patients with severe myoclonic
`epilepsy in infancy i.e., Dravet syndrome [49]. It
`
`NEWER ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`enhances central gamma-aminobutyric acid transmission
`and inhibits the metabolism of concurrently administered
`anticonvulsants that are substrates for various
`cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, such as clobazam [50]. In
`a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial
`conducted in France, stiripentol was used as an
`adjunctive therapy in children with Dravet syndrome who
`failed to respond to valproate and clobazam and was
`shown to have better response rate (71%) as compared to
`placebo (5%) [51] .
`Other Newer AEDs
`Retigabine (ezogabine) is a novel investigational AED
`developed as an adjunctive treatment for partial epilepsy.
`Retigabine opens voltage-gated KCNQ2/3 and
`KCNQ3/5 potassium channels leading to cellular
`membrane hyperpolarization (52). In a pooled analysis of
`three randomized controlled trials, 1240 patients were
`included, with 813 patients randomized to retigabine and
`427 to placebo (53). Responder rates (>50% reduction in
`seizure frequency) were 35% and 45% for retigabine
`dose at 600 and 900 mg/day, respectively. There is no
`pediatric experience so far, but retigabine may potentially
`be a useful agent in the treatment of benign familial
`neonatal convulsions which is caused by loss of function
`mutations involving the KCNQ2/3 genes [54].
`Brivaracetam is an analogue of levetiracetam, which has
`been found useful in adults with photosensitive epilepsy,
`and as an adjunctive treatment in refractory partial-onset
`epilepsy. There is no pediatric experience till now.
`Ganaxolone is a synthetic analogue of allopregnenolone,
`a neurosteroid, which is an allosteric modulator of the
`GABA-A receptor complex. In a 3-month pediatric add-
`on study, 20 subjects aged 6 months to 7 years with
`refractory infantile spasms, or with continuing seizures
`after a prior history of infantile spasms were titrated up to
`12 mg/kg. Sixteen patients completed the study; 25%
`showed a > 50% reduction in seizures, and one patient
`was seizure free (55). Ganaxolone may also have efficacy
`for catamenial seizures.
`Eslicarbazepine actetate is structurally related to
`carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine and has been used as
`adjunctive therapy for adults with partial seizures. There
`is no pediatric experience so far.
`Perampanel is a selective, non-competitive antagonist of
`a-amino-3-hydroxy 5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
`(AMPA) -type glutamate receptors, currently in clinical
`development as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of
`refractory partial-onset seizures [56]. Efficacy and
`tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in patients aged
`>12 years with refractory partial-onset seizures has been
`
`INDIAN PEDIATRICS
`
`1036 (cid:9)
`
`VOLUME 50—NOVEMBER 15, 2013
`
`Page 00004
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`ANEJA AND SHARMA
`
`NEWER ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`demonstrated in three phase III, randomized, double-
`blind, placebo-controlled trials.
`
`CURRENT STATUS OF THE NEWER AEDs
`
`The dosages and adverse effects of the newer AED
`currently available in India are summarized in Table I.
`Amongst the newer AED, oxcarbazepine is established as
`effective as initial monotherapy for children with partial-
`onset seizures. Vigabatrin is the drug of choice for
`infantile spasms associated with Tuberous sclerosis.
`Lamotrigine may be considered as monotherapy in
`adolescent females with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.
`Certain newer AEDs such as lamotrigine and vigabatrin
`are known to worsen myoclonic seizures. There is paucity
`of data on the use of newer AEDs in children from India.
`Indian Guidelines for diagnosis and management of
`childhood epilepsy were recently published [57]. As per
`these guidelines, the only newer AED which are
`recommended for use as monotherapy in new-onset
`epilepsy are lamotrigine in partial and generalized
`seizures, and oxcarbazepine in partial seizures. The
`others are recommended as adjunctive treatment in
`children who have failed conventional AED.
`
`Levetiracetam is a good option as monotherapy for
`females with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Topiramate and
`
`zonisamide are good options in patients with infantile
`spasms who have failed hormonal therapy and vigabatrin.
`Topiramate is a good add-on drug in patients with epileptic
`encephalopathies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and
`Myoclonic astatic epilepsy. Lamotrigine, levetiracetam
`and lacosamide are good add-on drugs for patients with
`refractory partial seizures. Lamotrigine is also effective in
`tonic seizures seen in children with Lennox-Gastaut
`syndrome.
`
`Rare but serious side effects must always be borne in
`mind while prescribing newer AEDs: irreversible
`peripheral field defect with vigabatrin, allergic rash/Steven
`Johnson syndrome with lamotrigine, arrhythmias with
`rufinamide (short QT interval) and lacosamide (prolonged
`PR interval) and fatal hyperammonemic encephalopathy
`with topiramate. Role of monitoring serum levels of newer
`AEDs are limited as the recommended levels are not well
`defined.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Most of these newer AED have been tested as add-on
`therapy in drug resistant epilepsy and are not superior to
`the first generation AEDs in efficacy. The main
`advantage of some of the newer agents was their better
`tolerability and pharmacokinetic profiles compared to
`
`Drug
`
`Lamotrigine
`Monotherapy
`
`TABLE I CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NEW ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`Initial dose
`(mg/kg/day)
`
`Maintenance (cid:9) Daily (cid:9)
`(mg/kg/day) (cid:9)
`doses no
`
`Side effects (cid:9)
`
`Formulation
`
`0.5
`
`2-10
`
`2
`
`Skin rash, somnolence, dizziness, (cid:9) Tab 5 mg; 25 mg, 50 mg
`nausea, diplopia
`
`With enzyme
`inducing AEDs
`With valproate
`Vigabatrin
`
`2
`0.2
`20-50
`
`Oxcarbazepine
`
`Topiramate
`
`Zonisamide
`
`Levetiracetam
`
`Lacosamide
`
`5-8
`
`1
`
`1-2
`
`10
`
`1-2
`
`5-15
`1-5
`50-150
`
`10-30
`
`6-9
`
`8-12
`
`20-60
`
`6-9
`
`2
`1-2
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`Tab 150 mg, 300 mg,
`Syrup 300 mg/5 mL
`Tab 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg
`
`Cap 25mg, 50 mg, 100 mg
`
`Tab 500 mg
`
`Hyperkinesia, weight gain, (cid:9)
`insomnia, visual field defects
`Dizziness, ataxia, somnolence (cid:9)
`hyponatremia (cid:9)
`Wt. loss, lethargy, anorexia, (cid:9)
`hyperpyrexia, renal calculi
`Ataxia, renal (cid:9)
`calculi hyperpyrexia
`Headache, anorexia, somnolence, (cid:9) Tab 250 mg, 500 mg,
`behavioral problems (cid:9)
`Syrup 500 mg/5 mL
`Dizziness, headache, diplopia, (cid:9)
`Tab 50 mg, 100 mg
`nausea
`
`INDIAN PEDIATRICS
`
`1037 (cid:9)
`
`VOLUME 50—NOVEMBER 15, 2013
`
`Page 00005
`
`(cid:9)
`

`
`ANEJA AND SHARMA (cid:9)
`
`NEWER ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`TABLE H PHARMACOKINETIC PROPERTIES OF NEWER ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`Drug
`
`Oral bioavailability Elimination t1/2
`
`Protein binding
`
`Metabolism
`
`Vigabatrin
`Levetiracetam
`Topiramate
`Lamotrigine
`Oxcarbazepine
`Zonisamide
`Lacosamide
`Rufinamide
`Stiripentol
`
`80-100%
`100%
`>80%
`<100%
`>95%
`100%
`100%
`Dose dependent
`Quick absorption
`
`5-8 hrs
`6-8 hrs
`21 hours
`29 hours
`8-10 hours
`60 hours
`13 hours
`6-10 hours
`4.5 hours
`
`Nil
`<10%
`15-40%
`55%
`38%
`40-60%
`<15%
`34%
`99%
`
`Renal
`2/3° renal1/3° enzymatic hydrolysis
`30% metabolised70% excreted unchanged
`Metabolized in liver
`Metabolized in liver to active metabolite
`Metabolized in liver
`Metabolized in liver
`Metabolized in liver
`Metabolized in liver
`
`TABLE HI MECHANISM OF ACTION, INDICATIONS AND MAIN ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NEWER ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`Principal mechanism (cid:9)
`of action (cid:9)
`
`Indications in pediatric (cid:9)
`epilepsy
`
`Main adverse effect (cid:9)
`
`Remarks
`
`Drug
`
`Vigabatrin (cid:9)
`
`Inhibition of GABA (cid:9)
`transaminase (cid:9)
`
`Levetiracetam (cid:9)
`
`Inhibition of N- type (cid:9)
`calcium channel (cid:9)
`
`Topiramate (cid:9)
`
`Lamotrigine (cid:9)
`
`Blockage of voltage
`dependent Na+
`channel, inhibition
`ofGABA
`Inhibition of voltage
`gated sodium channel
`
`Oxcarbazepine Inhibition of voltage
`sensitive sodium
`channel
`
`Zonisamide
`
`Lacosamide
`
`Rufinamide
`
`Stiripentol
`level
`
`Acts on sodium and
`voltage dependent
`calcium channel
`Enhances slow inacti-
`vation of voltgage gated
`sodium channel
`Reduces recovery
`capacity of sodium
`channel inactivation
`Increase in GABA (cid:9)
`refractory seizures in (cid:9)
`
`Visual field defects (cid:9)
`
`Behavioural
`disturbances
`
`Monotherapy in infantile (cid:9)
`spasm (tuberous sclerosis); (cid:9)
`adjuctive therapy in
`resistant partial epilepsy
`Adjunctive therapy in
`partial onset seizure;
`Myoclonic seizure 'AIME;
`GTCS in IGE
`Behavioural and
`Adjunctive therapy
`(>2 yrs) in refractory (cid:9)
`cognitive problem;
`weight loss; metabolic
`partial, generalized and
`seizures associated with LGS acidosis; nephrolithiasis
`Allergic rash/Steven
`Adjunctive treatment for (cid:9)
`focal or generalized seizures Johnson syndrome
`and seizures of LGS
`
`Monotherapy or adjunctive CNS side effects,
`therapy (>4 yr) for focal (cid:9)
`hyponatremia
`seizure with or without
`secondary generalization
`Adjunctive therapy in (cid:9)
`refractory focal seizures (cid:9)
`
`CNS side effects,
`cognitive effect,
`weight loss
`Frequent CNS effects,
`prolongation of PR
`interval
`Occasional CNS side
`effects
`
`Few minor CNS effects (cid:9)
`of drug interaction
`
`Adjunctive therapy in (cid:9)
`refractory focal and (cid:9)
`generalized epilepsy (cid:9)
`Adjunctive treatment in (cid:9)
`refractory seizures in LGS (cid:9)
`
`Adjunctive therapy for (cid:9)
`
`dravet syndrome
`
`It can aggravate absence
`and Myoclonic seizure
`
`No drug interaction;
`good safety profile; safe
`in liver disease
`
`Slow titration mandatory;
`never withdraw drug
`abruptly
`
`Slow titration; half dose
`when used with valpraote;
`can precipitate
`Myoclonic seizures
`Can worsen absence and
`Myoclonic seizure,
`
`Drug interactions with
`otherAEDs
`
`Limited experience in
`children; more studies
`required
`Avoid in patients with
`familial short QT
`syndrome
`Limited experience;
`
`(GABA- Gamma amino butyric acid, CNS-Central nervous system, IGE- idiopathic generalized epilepsy, JME- juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, GTCS-
`generalized tonic clonic seizure, LGS- Lennox Gastaut syndrome).
`
`INDIAN PEDIATRICS (cid:9)
`
`1038 (cid:9)
`
`VOLUME 50—NOVEMBER 15, 2013
`
`Page 00006
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`ANEJA AND SHARMA
`
`NEWER ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS
`
`the earlier AED. Other than Oxcarbazepine for partial
`epilepsy, there is no evidence for the use of the newer
`AED as monotherapy in new-onset epilepsy in children.
`Some of the newer AEDs have proven efficacy for some
`childhood epileptic syndrome e.g. vigabatrin for infantile
`spasms, levetiracetam for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy,
`rufinamide for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and stiripentol
`for Dravet syndrome. The current choice of available
`AEDs also allows for options for children with
`concomitant systemic illnesses and co-morbidities based
`on the pharmacokinetic profiles of these drugs.
`
`However, the cost of these drugs increases the cost of
`therapy and limits their use in low and middle income
`countries.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Mackay MT, Weiss SK, Adams-Webber T, Ashwal
`S, Stephens D, Ballaban-Gill K, et al.Practice parameter:
`medical treatment of infantile spasms: report of the
`American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology
`Society. Neurology. 2004; 62:1668-81.
`2. Go CY, Mackay MT, Weiss SK, Stephens D, Adams-
`Webber T, Ashwal S, et al. Evidence-based guideline
`update: medical treatment of infantile spasms. Report of the
`Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American
`Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the
`Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2012;78:1974-80.
`3. Elterman RD, Shields WD, Mansfield KA, Nakagawa J.
`Randomized trial of vigabatrin in patients with infantile
`spasms. Neurology. 2001;57:1416-21.
`4. Lux AL, Edwards SW, Hancock E, Johnson AL, Kennedy
`CR, Newton RW, et al. The United Kingdom Infantile
`Spasms Study (UKISS) comparing hormone treatment
`with vigabatrin on developmental and epilepsy outcomes to
`age 14 months: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet
`Neurol. 2005;4:712-7.
`5. Plant GT, Sergott RC. Understanding and interpreting
`vision safety issues with vigabatrin therapy. Acta Neurol
`Scand Suppl. 2011:57-71.
`6. Willmore LI, Abelson MB, Ben-Menachem E, Pellock JM,
`Shields WD. Vigabatrin: 2008 update. Epilepsia.
`2009;50:163-73.
`7. Krauss GL. Evaluating risks for vigabatrin treatment.
`Epilepsy Curr. 2009;9:125-9.
`8. Cannant L. Vigabatrin therapy for infantile spasms: review
`of major trials in Europe, Canada, and the United States;
`and recommendations for dosing. Acta Neurol Scand
`Suppl. 2011:36-47.
`9. Pellock JM, Hrachovy R, Shinnar S, Baram TZ, Bettis D,
`Dlugos DJ, etal. Infantile spasms: a U.S. consensus report.
`Epilepsia. 2010;51:2175-89.
`10. Lukyanetz EA, Shkryl VM, Kostyuk PG. Selective
`blockade of N-type calcium channels by levetiracetam.
`Epilepsia. 2002;43:9-18.
`11. Verrotti A, D'Adamo E, Parisi P, Chiarelli F, Curatolo P.
`Levetiracetam in childhood epilepsy. Paediatr Drugs.
`
`2010;12:177-86.
`12 . Ramantani G, Ikonomidou C, Walter B, Rating D, Dinger
`J. Levetiracetam: safety and efficacy in neonatal seizures.
`Eur J Pediatr Neurol. 2011;15:1-7.
`13. McTaque A, Kneen R, Kumar R, Spinty S, Appleton R.
`Intravenous levetiracetam in acute repitive seizures and
`status epilepticus in children: experience from a children's
`hospital. Seizure. 2012;21:529-34.
`14. Kossoff EH, Bergey GK, Freeman JM, Vining EP.
`Levetiracetam psychosis in children with epilepsy.
`Epilepsia. 2001;42:1611-3.
`15. Verrotti A, Coppola G, Manco R, Ciambra G, lannetti P,
`Grosso S, et al. Levetiracetam monotherapy for children
`and adolescents with benign rolandic seizures. Seizure.
`2007;16:271-5.
`16. De Los Reyes EC, Sharp GB, Williams JP, Hale SE.
`Levetiracetam in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut
`syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2004;30:254-6.
`17. Verrotti A, Cerminara C, Coppola G, Franzoni E, Parisi P,
`'anneal P, et al. Levetiracetam in juvenile myoclonic
`epilepsy: long-term efficacy in newly diagnosed
`adolescents. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:29-32.
`18. Kossoff EH, Los JG, Boatman DF. A pilot study
`transitioning children onto levetiracetam monotherapy to
`improve language dysfunction associated with benign
`rolandic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behay. 2007;11:514-7.
`19. Kossoff EH, Bergey GK, Freeman JM, Vining EP.
`Levetiracetam psychosis in children with epilepsy.
`Epilepsia. 2001;42:1611-3.
`20. Coppola G, Caliendo G, Terracciano MM, Buono S,
`Pellegrino L, Pascotto A. Topiramate in refractory partial-
`onset seizures in children, adolescents and young adults: a
`multicentric open trial. Epilepsy Res. 2001;43:255-60.
`21. Sreenivasan P, Kunju PA. Efficacy of Topiramate as an
`add-on drug in seizures in Indian children-an
`observational study. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78:1221-4.
`22. Hancock EC, Cross JH. Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut
`syndrome. (cid:9)
`Cochrane (cid:9)
`Database (cid:9)
`Syst (cid:9)
`Rev.
`2013;2:CD003277.
`23. Zou LP, Lin Q, Qin J, Cai FC, Liu ZS, Mix E. Evaluation of
`open-label topiramate as primary or adjunctive therapy in
`infantile spasms. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2008;31:86-92.
`24. Mikaeloff Y, de Saint-Martin A, Mancini J, Peudenier S,
`Pedespan JM, Vallee L, et al. Topiramate: efficacy and
`tolerability in children according to epilepsy syndromes.
`Epilepsy Res. 2003;53:225-32.
`25. Biton V, Bourgeois BF. Topiramate in patients with
`juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1705-
`1708.
`26. Ben-Zeev B, Watemberg N, Augarten A, Brand N, Yahav
`Y, Efrati 0, et al. Oligohydrosis and hyperthermia: pilot
`study of a novel topiramate adverse effect. J Child Neurol.
`2003;18:254-7.
`27. Yamamoto Y, Takahashi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket