throbber
VEMBER I DECEMBER 1988 VOLUME 29
`
`NUMBER 6
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2093 - 1/8
`
`

`
`29(6):787-793, 1988
`press, Ltd., New Yo~k
`.
`International League Agamst Epilepsy
`
`Adverse Reactions to Antiepileptic Drugs: A Follow-Up
`Study of 355 Patients with Chronic Antiepileptic
`Drug Treatment
`
`Collaborative Group for Epidemiology of Epilepsy*
`
`Institute fo,r Pharmacological Research "Mario Negri," Milan, Italy
`
`'• tes.
`:uaJes
`droe.
`igeno
`:ibfan
`en 19
`:vaJu.
`lobre
`l con
`:n los
`rmos
`1ente
`:s de
`~2 en
`10 se
`cam.
`
`. Three hundred fifty-five patients receiving

`· drug (AED) treatment were followed
`nnt\!Pl"~lty and hospital centers for an average of 11
`to assess the effects of intensive monitoring of
`drug reactions (ADRs) on the frequency of re(cid:173)
`on the overall management of epilepsy. One
`forty-eight patients (41.6%) had one or more
`during the entire follow-up period. ADRs were re(cid:173)
`by 31% of patients at admission and by 20% at last
`with a downward trend in the number of reports.
`mcttrre:ntJV, the number of patients who were seizure(cid:173)
`rose from 24.5 to 42.8%. During the observation pe-
`
`riod, the number of prescriptions fell from 640 to 568,
`mostly for phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), and val(cid:173)
`proate (VPA). The outcome of the most common ADR was
`only partially related to drug changes. Even with the lim(cid:173)
`itations of the unstandardized criteria used for ADR re(cid:173)
`porting, the present study shows that intensive monitor(cid:173)
`ing of drug-related clinical events is not only a valuable
`tool to provide a comprehensive survey of drug toxicity in
`clinical practice, but is also an educational effort to im(cid:173)
`prove the quality of care for patients with epilepsy. Key
`Words: Anticonvulsants-Epidemiology-Epilepsy(cid:173)
`Drug-induced abnormalities-Italy.
`
`The problem of drug toxicity in patients receiving
`· antiepileptic drug treatment has been re(cid:173)
`y emphasized (for reviews see: Reynolds,
`; Schmidt, 1982; Beghi et al., 1986b). However,
`commonest sources of information on drug tax(cid:173)
`are case reports and clinical trials (Beghi et al.,
`). In both, the reported events do not repre(cid:173)
`the ideal situation for a meaningful assessment
`the prevalence and characteristics of adverse
`reactions (ADRs) seen in daily practice. Case
`s are drawn from populations at unknown
`
`Received August 1987; revision accepted May 1988.
`*Coordinators: Ettore Beghi, Daniela Trevisan, and Gianni
`·. Members: Sonia Arrigoni, Giovanni Beretta, Ugo
`Sergio Borgheresi, Daniela Buti, Maura Buttiglione, Gio(cid:173)
`Cagnin, Cesare Cardinali, Giuseppina Chiodelli, Chiara
`·, Umberto Colangelo, Carlo A. De Fanti, Elena Gambini,
`Giuliani, Angela La Neve, Carlo Lenti, Vito Lepore,
`Lini, Manuela Molteni, Maria Luisa Monticelli, Feder(cid:173)
`Cristina Musetti, Giuseppe Olivieri, Andrea Or(cid:173)
`Perniola, Luigi Piattella, Daniele Porazzi, An-
`......... L . . uu. Maria R. Rottoli, Raffaella Silvestri, Luigi M.
`, Franco Spinogatti, Vito Toso. Marta Trizio, Gaetano
`Piergiuseppe Zagnoni, and Nelia Zamponi.
`correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. E. Beghi
`for Pharmacological Research "Mario Negri," Via
`62, 20157 Milan, Italy.
`
`risk, and patients recruited in clinical trials are not
`entirely representative of the epilepsy population at
`large. The frequency and types of ADRs recorded
`in studies dealing with intensive monitoring of clin(cid:173)
`ical practice are a better reflection of the prevalence
`and clinical implications of drug toxicity as they are
`perceived in routine health care delivery frame(cid:173)
`works. In a multicenter survey of clinical practice
`conducted in our country with 509 patients receiv(cid:173)
`ing chronic antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment
`(Collaborative Group for Epidemiology of Epi(cid:173)
`lepsy, 1986), 31% had one or more ADRs, with a
`wide range of occurrence between centers. Of the
`232 recorded events, 109 were definite, 84 were
`possible, and 26 were doubtful. Symptoms and/or
`signs of drug toxicity were ·reported by the patient
`in 54.5% of the cases, were clinically important in
`52.5%, permanent in 49.5%, and intolerable in
`13.5%. ADRs were present in 22% of monotherapy
`patients, in 34.2% of patients treated with two
`drugs, and in 44.4% of patients receiving three or
`more drugs. Occurrence of ADRs varied by drug:
`phenytoin (PHT) (33%), phenobarbital (PB) (23%),
`carbamazepine (CBZ) (15%), and valproate (VPA)
`(12%). Somnolence was the most common com-
`
`71<7
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2093 - 2/8
`
`

`
`788
`
`COLLABORATIVE GROUP FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF EPILEPSY
`
`plaint, followed by gingival hyperplasia, nystag(cid:173)
`mus, and ataxia.
`A random sample of 355 cohort cases was fol(cid:173)
`lowed to assess the effects of prolonged monitoring
`of drug toxicity on frequency of ADRs and on overall
`management of the disease. We report the results of
`that follow-up study.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`
`A cohort of 509 patients receiving AED treatment
`for > 3 months was recruited in the outpatient ser(cid:173)
`vices of 15 Italian university and hospital depart(cid:173)
`ments, including six epilepsy centers. Patient data,
`general characteristics of the epilepsy, drug treat(cid:173)
`ment, and ADRs have been previously reported
`(Collaborative Group for Epidemiology of Epi(cid:173)
`lepsy, 1986). Three hundred fifty-five unselected
`patients were then followed for an average period of
`11 months (range 1-36 months). The number of fol(cid:173)
`low-up visits varied between patients depending on
`the number and types of requests and on the length
`of the observation period. During each follow-up
`visit, seizure frequency and types, data relevant to
`the diagnosis or drug, and ADRs (including new oc(cid:173)
`currences) were recorded. Seizure frequency at ad-
`
`mission was calculated based on the previou
`months. All data collected during the follow~ 6
`were processed using a Statistical Package for t~p
`Special Sciences (SPSS) and, where indicated st e
`tistical analysis was done using the chi-squar~ tt
`for independent variables.
`st
`
`RESULTS
`The characteristics of the 355 follow-up patient
`generally overlapped those of the original cohort (Ta~
`ble 1). Only a significant change in seizure distribu(cid:173)
`tion was found, with a relative decrease of mixed
`and unclassified seizures and an increase of com(cid:173)
`plex partial, tonic/clonic, and absence seizures.
`One or more ADRs were reported in 148 patients
`(41.6%) during the observation period. Adverse re(cid:173)
`actions are reported in Table 2. ADRs were 284
`with 207 cases reporting none; 67 cases, one; 4g
`cases, two; 17 cases, three; and 15 cases, four or
`more. The average number of ADRs per subject
`was 1. 7 among mono therapy patients, 2 among pa(cid:173)
`tients treated with two drugs, and 2.5 among pa(cid:173)
`tients taking three or more drugs. At admission, 110
`(31%) of patients reported ADRs. The number fell to
`71 (20%) at the last follow-up visit. When the per(cid:173)
`centage of patients with ADRs was plotted against
`time (Fig. 1), there was a downward trend in the
`
`TABLE 1. Characteristics of the 355 follow-up patients with comparison to the original cohort of 509 cases
`
`Variable
`
`No. of cases
`
`A. Age distribution (yr) mean (±SE)
`B. Percent with disease duration of
`<1 yr
`1-3 yr
`4-10 yr
`>10 yr
`Not specified
`C. Percent with seizures in the previous 6 months
`None
`1-3
`4-10
`>10
`Not specified
`D. Percent with associated disordera
`None
`Anoxia/birth trauma
`Head trauma
`Infection
`Hereditary disease
`Metabolic/toxic
`Malformations
`Othersb
`E. Percent with seizure pattern (in%)
`Partial
`Generalized
`Mixed and unspecified
`Unilateral
`
`21
`66
`97
`165
`6
`
`87
`74
`54
`106
`34
`
`186
`66
`35
`21
`14
`9
`8
`40
`
`172
`131
`50
`1
`
`Follow-up
`
`24.8 (±0.9)
`
`Original
`
`23.7 (±0.7)
`
`6.0
`18.5
`27.0
`46.5
`2.0
`
`24.5
`21.0
`15.0
`30.0
`9.5
`
`52.3
`18.5
`9.8
`5.9
`3.9
`2.5
`2.2
`11.2
`
`48.0
`37.0
`14.0
`0.5
`
`7.0
`21.5
`26.5
`43.5
`1.5
`
`29.5
`20.0
`14.0
`28.0
`8.5
`
`50.5
`20.5
`11.0
`6.0
`3.5
`2.7
`2.7
`12.0
`
`49.0
`24.0
`26.0
`1.0
`
`a Percentages do not equal 100% because two or more associated disorders were concurrently present in some patients.
`b Including vascular, neoplastic, and degenerative disorders.
`
`Epilepsia, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1988
`
`--------
`
`central nel
`Somnole
`Nystagn·
`Ataxia
`Vertigo.
`Diplopia
`Tremor
`Slownes
`Head ad
`Irritabili
`Mental l
`Other"
`Skin and c
`Gingiva'
`Rash
`Acne
`Hirsutis
`Alopeci
`Enamel
`Other
`Gastrointi
`Nausea
`Liver d
`Other
`Weight
`Hypo to
`Blood<
`As then
`Early s
`Hypote
`Flushir
`Dyspni
`Total
`
`"Stupe
`(2); hype
`chosis ( l•
`b The s
`patients'
`concurre
`
`Patients w
`
`%
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2093 - 3/8
`
`

`
`MONITORING ADVERSE AED REACTIONS
`
`789
`
`TABLE 2. Adverse drug reactions
`
`unsteadiness
`' and other ocular disorders
`and other extrapyramidal signs
`of mentation
`
`development
`
`Total
`
`181
`
`50
`
`26
`
`27
`
`62
`23
`21
`18
`12
`9
`7
`5
`5
`4
`15
`
`28
`6
`6
`5
`2
`2
`1
`
`24
`2
`
`8
`6
`6
`3
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`dysmetria (2); depression, anxiety (2); enuresis
`hYrlert~oni<~ity (1); dysarthria (1); coma (1); hiccup (1); psy(cid:173)
`); status epilepticus (1); insomnia (1).
`sum of the adverse reactions is more than the number of
`with ADRs because in 81 cases two or more ADRs were
`
`-
`
`r--_
`
`,____
`
`-
`
`r--
`
`-~---
`
`number of reports (27% at 6 months, 20% at 12
`months, and 11.5% at 16 months).
`Seizure frequency and treatment regimens at ad(cid:173)
`mission and at last visit are illustrated in Table 3.
`The proportion of seizure-free patients rose from
`24.5% at admission to 42.8% at last visit. The num(cid:173)
`ber of patients with > 20 seizures decreased from 20
`to 8. 7%. Among the 87 seizure-free patients at ad(cid:173)
`mission, 26% had ADRs, as compared to 32% of
`cases with uncontrolled seizures (chi-square: 1.11;
`p = NS). Conversely, at the last visit, the percent(cid:173)
`ages of patients with ADRs in the two groups were
`15 and 24%, respectively (chi-square: 3.93; p <
`0.05). Overall, previously recorded ADRs had dis(cid:173)
`appeared at last visit in 62.2% of seizure-free pa(cid:173)
`tients and in 22.2% of cases with relapses.
`During the follow-up, there was a slight increase
`of the number of monotherapy cases ( 40.5-50%)
`and a concurrent decrease of patients taking three
`or more drugs (18-10%). The number of prescrip(cid:173)
`tions fell from 640 to 568, mostly for PB, PHT, and
`VP A. The drug most frequently prescribed at the
`last visit was CBZ. Drugs containing fixed combi(cid:173)
`nations of PHT and PB were withdrawn in 25 of 38
`patients (66%).
`The percentage of adverse reactions varied ac(cid:173)
`cording to the number of drugs concurrently taken,
`although a lower percentage of patients had ADRs
`at the last visit than at admission (Table 4). There
`were also fewer ADRs for the individual drugs, ex(cid:173)
`cept for barbiturates and benzodiazepines.
`At last visit, drug plasms levels were assayed in
`23% of patients with ADRs (37 of 161) and in 18% of
`patients without ADRs (34 of 194) (chi-square: 1.31;
`p == NS). Overall, plasma levels values were within
`
`FIG. 1. Percentage of adverse
`drug reactions (ADRs) during
`follow-up. Numbers in paren(cid:173)
`theses refer to patients in each
`interval. Patients seen for >16
`months were not considered
`because they were few. A: first
`study visit.
`
`r--
`
`r---
`
`-
`
`1--
`
`'-
`16
`14 · 15
`l3
`12
`11
`10
`9
`8
`7
`6
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`A
`(355) (355) (352) (336) (308) (297) (284) (273) (263) (255) (242) (234) (201) (115) ( 76) (55) ( 35)
`
`months
`
`Epilepsia, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1988
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2093 - 4/8
`
`

`
`790
`
`COLLABORATIVE GROUP FOR 1:-r>IDEMIOLOGY OF EPILEPSY
`
`TABLE 3. Seizure frequency and treatment at first study visit and at last study visit in
`355 patients with chronic AED treatment
`
`Variable
`
`No. of cases
`
`%
`
`No. of cases
`
`%
`
`disappe
`
`First visit
`
`Last visit
`
`Seizure frequencya
`None
`1-3
`4-10
`11-20
`>20
`Not specified
`Antiepileptic treatment
`No. of drugs
`None
`1
`2
`3+
`Drug
`Phenobarbital and other barbiturates
`Carbamazepine
`Phenytoin
`Valproate
`Primidone
`Benzodiazepines
`Ethosuximide
`Other
`Total no. of prescriptions
`
`AED, antiepileptic drug.
`a See text for explanation.
`
`87
`74
`54
`35
`71
`34
`
`144
`147
`64
`
`219
`124
`102
`99
`38
`33
`18
`7
`
`640
`
`(24.5)
`(20.8)
`(15.2)
`(9.9)
`(20)
`(9.6)
`
`(-)
`(40.5)
`(41.5)
`(18)
`
`(34)
`(19.5)
`(16)
`(15.5)
`(6)
`(5)
`(3)
`(1)
`
`(100)
`
`152
`39
`76
`45
`31
`12
`
`3
`177
`137
`38
`
`176
`140
`88
`77
`40
`29
`12
`6
`
`568
`
`(42.8)
`(11)
`(21.7)
`(12.7)
`(8.7)
`(3.4)
`
`(1)
`(50)
`(50)
`(10)
`
`(31)
`(25)
`(15.5)
`(13.5)
`(7)
`(5)
`(2)
`(1)
`
`(100)
`
`normal limits in 78% of cases with and in 81% of
`cases without ADRs (chi-square: 0.04; p = NS). Of
`31 patients with abnormal plasma level values, only
`one had a toxic plasma drug concentration.
`The most common ADRs (i.e., those with 10 +
`reports) are shown in Fig. 2 along with the clinical
`decision on whether treatment was altered. Somno(cid:173)
`lence disappeared during follow-up in two-thirds of
`cases, 47% of which had changes in treatment. Gin(cid:173)
`gival hyperplasia improved in one-third of cases,
`56% without change in treatment. Ataxia evolved
`
`TABLE 4. Percentage of patients with ADRs by
`number of drugs and drug at first and last study visit
`
`Variable
`
`No. of drugs
`1
`2
`3+
`Druga
`ESM
`PHT
`VPA
`BZD
`PB and other barbiturates
`CBZ
`PRM
`
`First visit
`(% ADRs)
`
`Last visit
`(% ADRs)
`
`20.0
`37.5
`40.5
`
`50.0
`36.0
`31.5
`20.0
`17.0
`15.5
`
`15.0
`22.0
`34.0
`
`29.0
`7.0
`33.0
`19.0
`7.0
`
`ESM, ethosuximide; PHT, phenytoin; VPA, valproate; BZD,
`benzodiazepines; PB, phenobarbital; CBZ, carbamazepine;
`PRM, primidone.
`- a Only monotherapy patients were considered.
`
`Epilepsia, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1988
`
`favorably in 86% of cases, mostly after changes in
`treatment. Drug changes were made in the majority
`of patients with diplopia, all of whom had complete
`recovery. Both vertigo and nystagmus disappeared
`in 61% of cases, mostly without changes in treat(cid:173)
`ment. Treatment modifications were recorded in
`50% of cases with gastrointestinal (Gl) distur(cid:173)
`bances, and symptoms did not recur in the majority
`of patients.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Patients receiving chronic treatment with AEDs
`are at high risk of developing symptoms and/or
`signs of drug toxicity. In the present survey, ADRs
`were present in 41.6% of patients surveyed for an
`average period of 11 months. The high frequency of
`reports can be due in part to incorrect use of AEDs.
`Our findings indicate that intensive surveillance of
`ADRs can lead to a progressive decrease in ADRs,
`resulting in a better diagnostic assessment (a.s
`shown by the decreasing number of unclassified sei·
`zures) and an improved therapeutic approach (as
`shown by the smaller percentage of cases with un·
`controlled seizures).
`There are a number of reports on the improve·
`ment of the quality of care to patients with epilepsY
`after intensive surveillance, with concurrent reduc·
`tion in the number of seizures in the so-called ''re·
`
`'~ unchan g
`
`fractor:
`rative 1
`thorne
`studies
`ment i1
`signs o
`Theod<
`lation 1
`tient, a
`expost
`stresse
`ticularl
`dition
`(Reyn<
`may h
`drawal
`edly n
`(CNS)
`pie), e
`selli et
`Sauer
`' Con
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2093 - 5/8
`
`

`
`MONITORING ADVERSE AED REACTIONS
`
`791
`
`Therapy changed
`
`0
`rz:zJ Therapy unchanged
`
`FIG. 2. Outcome of most com(cid:173)
`mon adverse drug reactions
`(ADRs) (i.e., with 10 + reports)
`and related clinical decisions.
`Number of reports for each ADR
`is given in Table 2. Outcome of
`ADR was unknown in some
`cases: somnolence, 2; gingival
`hyperplasia, 1; gastrointestinal
`disturbances, 1; nystagmus, 1;
`vertigo, 3; and diplopia, 4.
`
`V"'
`:::::>
`::e
`(,!)
`<
`1-
`V"'
`>-
`z
`
`<
`X
`<
`1-
`<
`
`0
`(,!)
`i=
`0::
`UJ
`>
`
`<
`a:
`0
`...J
`a.
`0
`
`...J
`
`< z
`
`i=V"'
`V"'UJ
`UJU
`1-Z
`z<
`-co
`Oa::
`a::=>
`!;;t;
`<-
`(.!)0
`
`~disappeared
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`so
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`so
`
`60
`
`UJ u
`z
`UJ
`...J
`0 z
`::e
`0
`V"'
`
`<
`v;
`<
`...J...J
`<a.
`>O::
`-w
`<.!>a.
`~>-
`<.!>:X:
`
`epilepsies" (Lund, 1974; Milano Collabo-
`Group for Studies on Epilepsy, 1977; Caw(cid:173)
`and Silas, 1981; Beghi et al., 1987). Other
`have shown that optimization of drug treat(cid:173)
`is followed by a reduction of symptoms and
`of drug toxicity (Shorvon and Reynolds, 1979;
`et al., 1983). We found a positive corre(cid:173)
`between ADRs and number of drugs per pa(cid:173)
`and an overall decrease in the number of drug
`s during follow-up. This finding further
`the appropriateness of monotherapy, par(cid:173)
`because the benefit expected from the ad(cid:173)
`of a second drug is small in most instances
`~p,,~,.,.·~-~~ and Shorvon, 1981). Another factor that
`have reduced the number of ADRs is with(cid:173)
`al of drugs like PHT or PB, which are report(cid:173)
`more toxic to the central nervous system
`(a common site of involvement in our sam-
`' especially when given in combination (Mor(cid:173)
`et al., 1971; Lambie et al., 1976; Windorfer and
`' 1977).
`Control of ADRs was more difficult among pa-
`
`tients who had recurrent seizures during the obser-
`;
`vation period. This finding may be due to the much
`more complex management problems of patients
`with more severe epilepsy, with a higher risk of
`drug toxicity (Shorvon and Reynolds, 1979).
`The lack of correlation between ADRs and toxic
`PL values is worth noting. This is a limitation to use
`of PL measurement, even in the presence of symp(cid:173)
`toms or signs of drug toxicity, and confirms that
`clinical judgment still provides the most valid basis
`for the evaluation of drug toxicity.
`However, we do not know to what extent clinical
`judgment may have influenced ADR reporting dur(cid:173)
`ing follow-up. In an uncontrolled setting, drug
`changes may have influenced physicians' expecta(cid:173)
`tions about the outcome of the reported events.
`Likewise, an ADR may be thought to persist in the
`absence of any clinical decision. However, the ev(cid:173)
`olution of ADRs did not invariably follow physi(cid:173)
`cian's intervention, as in a remarkable percentage
`of cases the two events were totally independent.
`The synoptic presentation of the interplay between
`
`Epilepsia, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1988
`
`ler changes in
`in the majority
`t had complete
`1s disappeared
`anges in treat(cid:173)
`·e recorded in
`.1 (GI) distur·
`in the
`
`survey,
`Jrveyed for
`:h frequency of
`t use of AEDs.
`surveillance of
`·ease in ADRs,
`ssessment (as
`tnclassified sei~
`; approach (as
`cases with un·
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2093 - 6/8
`
`

`
`792
`
`COLLABORATIVE GROUP FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF EPILEPSY
`
`an expectant attitude and a change in treatment pro(cid:173)
`vides in this sense a highly suggestive and provok(cid:173)
`ing picture. Several explanations can be given for
`this discrepancy. First, a spontaneous regression of
`symptoms or signs of drug toxicity is frequently re(cid:173)
`ported with AEDs (Schmidt, 1982). This is particu(cid:173)
`larly true for somnolence in patients taking PB or
`benzodiazepines, and for GI disturbances ·with
`VPA. Tolerance or sometimes simple modifications
`of the daily schedule may account for the improve(cid:173)
`ment or disappearance of the symptoms in the ab(cid:173)
`sence of apparent drug, changes. Second, the per(cid:173)
`sistance of ADR despite treatment changes and
`even after withdrawal of the offending drug can be
`explained by the assumption that some aspects of
`chronic drug toxicity probably reflect structural
`changes. For instance, experimental evidence
`shows that PHT has marked effects on the chemical
`composition of skin through increased deposition of
`insoluble dermal collagen and insoluble scleropro(cid:173)
`tein with concurrent loss of fat (Houck et al., 1972).
`This may explain in part the occurrence of persis(cid:173)
`tent gum hyperplasia, facial skin changes, and Du(cid:173)
`puytren's contracture with PHT, even after drug
`cessation. Third, since our physicians used un(cid:173)
`standardized and often subjective criteria for the
`definition of drug toxicity (Collaborative Group for
`Epidemiology of Epilepsy, 1986), a clear-cut cause(cid:173)
`effect relationship between drugs and events in(cid:173)
`tended as ADRs could not be invariably stated, thus
`raising the suspicion that some of those reports may
`be independent events. Up to 80% of symptoms and
`signs commonly interpreted as ADRs have also
`been reporteciin untreated patients (Reidenberg and
`Lowenthal, 1968).
`1 Even with these limitations, the prospective re(cid:173)
`porting of drug-related clinical events appears to be
`a valuable tool to provide a comprehensive survey
`of drug toxicity in routine clinical practice. In addi(cid:173)
`tion, investigation and reporting of ADRs to AEDs
`becomes an educational effort for the practicing
`physicians which leads not only to less drug toxicity
`but also to overall improvement in the quality of the
`care for patients with epilepsy.
`
`Acknowledgment: This study was supported by Na(cid:173)
`tional Research Council Grant No. 85/00447.56 on Pre(cid:173)
`ventive and Rehabilitative Medicine.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Beghi E, DiMascio R. Antiepileptic drug toxicity: definition and
`mechanism of action. !tal J New·ol Sci 1986a;7:209-22.
`Beghi E, Di Mascio R, Tognoni G. Adverse effects of anticon(cid:173)
`vulsant drugs-a critical review. Adv Drug React Ac Pais
`Rev 1986b;2:63-86.
`Beghi E, Bellini P, DiMascio R, Cerisola N, Merloni T, Manghi
`
`Epilepsia, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1988
`
`Pal
`]as n
`cuen
`epile
`tami€
`cient
`pleto
`admi
`seen
`nuffij
`a 42.
`recel
`to ina
`estat
`icaci
`rizad
`actuc
`cimij
`strur
`su tc
`ucac
`con 1
`
`.
`E. Effects of rationalizing drug treatment of patient
`epilepsy and mental retardation. Dev Med Child ~ \Vith
`1987;29:363-9.
`eurof
`Cawthorne IF, Silas JH. Impact of therapeutic audit on h
`oin prescribing. Br Med J 1981 ;282: 1278.
`p enyt.
`Collaborative Group For Epidemiology of Epilepsy. Adve
`actions to antiepileptic drugs: a multicenter survey of c~~e_re.
`101
`practice. Epilepsia 1986;27:323-30.
`Ca]
`Houck JC, Cheng RF, Waters MD. Dyphenylhydantoin· eff
`on connective tissue and wound repair. In: Woodb~ry ~~ts
`Penry JK, Schmidt RP, eds. Antiepileptic drugs. New y 11k1:
`Raven Press, 1972:267-74.
`or .
`Lambie DG, Nanda RM, Johnson RH, Shakir RA. Therap
`.
`and pharmacokinetic effects of increasing phenytotut.Ic
`chronic epilepsies on multiple drug therapy. Lancet 1~7~~
`2:386-9.
`.
`Lund L. Anticonvulsant effect of diphenylhydantoin relative 10
`plasma levels. Arch Neural 1974;31:289-94.
`Milano Collaborative Group for Studies on Epilepsy. Long-ter
`intensive monitoring in the difficult patient. Preliminary r~
`s_ults of 16 months of observations-us~fuln~ss and limita(cid:173)
`tions. In: Gar~ne:-Th?rpe C, Janz ~' ~emardt H, Pippenger
`CE, eds. Antlepzleptzc drug monztorzng. Tunbridge Wells·
`Pitman Medical, 1977:197-213.

`Morselli PL, Rizzo M, Garattini S. Interaction between pheno(cid:173)
`barbital and diphenylhydantoin in animals and in epileptic
`patients. Ann NY Acad Sci 1971 ;179:88-107.
`Reidenberg MM, Lowenthal DT. Adverse non drug reactions. N
`Eng/ J Med 1968;279:678-9.
`Reynolds EH. Chronic antiepileptic toxicity: a review. Epilepsia
`1975;16:319-52.
`Reynolds EH, Shorvon SD. Monotherapy or polytherapy for
`epilepsy? Epilepsia 1981 ;22: 1-10.
`Schmidt D. Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs. New York:
`Raven Press, 1982.
`-
`Shorvon D, Reynolds EH. Reduction in polypharmacy for epi(cid:173)
`lepsy. Br Med J 1979;2:1023-5.
`Theodore WH, Schulman EA, Porter RJ. Intractable seizures:
`long-term follow-up after prolonged inpatient treatment in an
`epilepsy unit. Epilepsia 1983;24:336-43.
`Windorfer A Jr, Sauer W. Drug interactions during anticonvul(cid:173)
`sant therapy in childhood: diphenylhydantoin, primidone.
`phenobarbitone, clonazepam, nitrazepam, carbamazepine
`and dipropylacetate. Neuropediatrie 1977;8:29-41.
`
`RESUME
`
`355 patients traites de fa<;:on chronique par medicaments anti·
`epileptiques ont ete suivis dans 15 centres universitaires ethos·
`pitaliers pendant une moyenne de 11 mois afin de determiner les
`consequences d'une surveillance intensive des effets collateraux
`aux medicaments (ECM) sur la frequence des phenomenes rap·
`partes et sur la prise en charge globale de l'epilepsie. Au total.
`148 patients (41.6%) ont presente au mains 1 ECM pendant l'en·
`semble du sui vi. Des ECM ont ete signales par 31% des patient.s
`au moment de I' entree dans l'etude, et par 20% lors de Ia derm·
`ere consultation, avec une tendance a Ia decroissance dans k
`nombre de signalisations. Parallelement, Ie nombre de patients
`ne presentant plus de crises s'est eleve de 24.5 a 42.8%. Pendant
`la periode d'observation, le nombre total des prescriptions a
`chute de 640 a 568, avec le plus souvent phenobarbital, pheny(cid:173)
`toi:ne et valproate. L'evolution des ECM Ies plus frequents n 3
`ete que partiellement liee aux changements de traitement. ~~al·
`gre les limites entrainees par }'utilisation de criteres non standar·
`dises pour la signalisation des ECM, cette etude montre qu'une
`surveillance intensifiee des effets secondaires cliniques d~'
`medicaments est un outil utile pour obtenir un panorama de 3
`toxicite medicamenteuse en pratique clinique, mais represet
`aussi un effort educatif d'amelioration dans la prise en charge e)
`patients epileptiques.
`
`(P. Genton, Marseillei
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2093 - 7/8
`
`

`
`MONITORING ADVERSE AED REACTIONS
`
`793
`
`RESUMEN
`
`ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
`
`determinar los efectos de una monitorizacion intensiva de

`adversas de las medicaciones (ADR) y de su fre(cid:173)
`en las publicaciones que tratan del manejo general de Ia
`se han estudiado 355 enfermos que estaban en tra(cid:173)
`cronico con drogas antiepilepticas. Un total de 148 pa-
`41.6%) tenfan una o mas ADR durante el periodo com-
`seguimiento. Las ADR se identificaron en un 31% en Ia
`y en un 20% en la ultima visita con una tendecia de(cid:173)
`te en el numero de informes. Simultaneamente el
`de enfermos que estaban sin ataques aumento de 24.5%
`Durante el periodo de observacion el numero total de
`bajo de 640 a 568 sobre todo del Fenobarbital, la Feni(cid:173)
`el Valproato. Los resultados de las ADR mas comunes
`relacionados, solo parcialmente con los cambios de med(cid:173)
`incluso con las limitaciones de los criterios no estanda(cid:173)
`utilizados para Ia publicacion de las ADR. El estudio
`stra que Ia monitorizacion intensiva de los aconte-
`clfnicos relacionados con la droga no solo es un in(cid:173)
`valido para proporcionar una vision comprensiva de
`en Ia practica clfnica, sino tambien un esfuerzo ed(cid:173)
`para mejorar Ia calidad de Ia asistencia de los pacientes
`epilepsfa.
`
`355 Patienten mit chronischer Antiepileptika-Therapie wurden
`von 15 UniversiUitskliniken und anderen Zentren im
`Durchschnitt 11 Monate lang beobachtet, urn den Effekt der in(cid:173)
`tensiven Medikamenteniiberwachung beziiglich der Haufigkeit
`von Nebenwirkungen (ADR) und allgemeiner Auswirkung auf
`die Epilepsie festzustellen. Insgesamt hatten 148 Patienten
`(41.6%) eine oder mehrere ADR wahrend des Beobachtungszei(cid:173)
`tral)mes. ADR wurden in 31% zu Beginn und in 20% bei der
`letzten Vorstellung gefunden, allerdings mit deutlichem Abwart(cid:173)
`strend. Im Verlauf stieg die Zahl der anfallsfreien Patienten von
`24.5% auf 42.8%. Wahrend der Studie fiel die Verordnungshau(cid:173)
`figkeit von 640 auf 568 ab, meist Phenobarbital, Phenytoin oder
`Valproat. Der Verlauf der haufigsten ADR war z.T. durch
`Medikamentenanderung bedingt. Unter Beriicksichtigung der
`Grenzen unstandardisierter Kriterien zum Erfassen von ADR,
`zeigt die vorliegende Studie doch, daf3 intensives 'drug(cid:173)
`monitoring,' orientiert an klinischen Ereignissen, ein brauch(cid:173)
`bares Werkzeug darstellt, urn Arzneimitteltoxizitat im klinischen
`Alltag umfassend darzustellen. Zusatzlich wird die Qualitat der
`Betreuung von Patienten mit Epilepsie verbessert.
`
`(A. Portera-Sanchez, Madrid)
`
`(C. G. Lipinski, Heidelberg-Neckargemiind)
`
`Epilepsia, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1988
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2093 - 8/8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket