throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`RESEARCH CORPORATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00204
`Patent No. RE 38,551
`
`DECLARATION OF CARL W. BAZIL, M.D., Ph.D., IN SUPPORT OF
`PATENT OWNER RESPONSE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.120
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` DC: 6105540-8
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 1/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1
`
`Professional Background and Education ........................................................ 2
`
`III. The ’551 Patent and My Experience with Lacosamide .................................. 6
`
`IV. Background ..................................................................................................... 8
`
`A. Definition and Types of Epilepsy ........................................................ 8
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Effects of Epilepsy ............................................................................. 13
`
`Categories of Epilepsy Treatment ...................................................... 18
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Diet, Devices, and Surgery ...................................................... 18
`
`Antiepileptic Drugs .................................................................. 20
`
`D.
`
`Challenges with Treatment of Epilepsy ............................................. 26
`
`V.
`
`Lacosamide is a Valuable Addition to the Armamentarium of AEDs
`That Had Long Been Needed in 1996 .......................................................... 33
`
`A.
`
`Lacosamide Satisfies a Long-Felt Need for an AED with
`Lacosamide’s Unique Combination of Properties ............................. 35
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Need in 1996 for Various Properties of AEDs ........................ 35
`
`Lacosamide Meets the Need Recognized in 1996 ................... 44
`
`B.
`
`Lacosamide’s Success Was Unexpected ............................................ 62
`
`C. Other AEDs Failed ............................................................................. 62
`
`D.
`
`Lacosamide Has Been Praised ........................................................... 65
`
`VI. Conclusion .................................................................................................... 68
`
`
`
`- i -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 2/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`I, Carl W. Bazil, M.D., Ph.D., declare as follows:
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`1.
`
`
`I have been retained by Patent Owner Research Corporation
`
`Technologies, Inc., (“Patent Owner”) in the present inter partes review. I
`
`understand that the petition names Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC as the
`
`petitioner, and that Intelligent Pharma Research LLC, APS GP LLC, and APS GP
`
`Investors LLC have been identified as real parties-in-interest. I further understand
`
`that KVK-TECH, Inc. has also been identified as a potential real party-in-interest.
`
`I have no financial interest in, or affiliation with, the petitioner, the identified
`
`actual or potential real parties-in-interest, or the patent owner. I am being
`
`compensated at my usual and customary hourly rate, and my compensation is not
`
`dependent upon the outcome of, or the content of my opinions in, this proceeding
`
`or in any other proceeding. The opinions I set forth herein are my own and are
`
`based on my review of materials in this matter and the education, experience,
`
`training, and skills I have accumulated.
`
`2.
`
`
`I am a clinical epileptologist with decades-long experience in treating
`
`patients with epilepsy, in publishing and reviewing literature regarding epilepsy,
`
`teaching students, residents, and other doctors regarding epilepsy, and in
`
`conducting studies regarding epilepsy. In this Declaration, I offer my opinions on
`
`the effects of epilepsy on patients, the treatment of epilepsy, the need for improved
`
`- 1 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 3/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`antiepileptic drugs (“AEDs”) particularly as of 1996, a failure to meet that need,
`
`and also the contributions of lacosamide to the armamentarium of practicing
`
`epileptologists such as myself.
`
`3.
`
`
`I have reviewed the articles and documents cited in this Declaration. I
`
`am aware of information generally relied upon by physicians and others treating
`
`people with epilepsy at the relevant times, and my opinions below are based on
`
`such awareness.
`
`II.
`
`Professional Background and Education
`
`4.
`
`
`I am the Caitlin Tynan Doyle Professor of Neurology at the College of
`
`Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University. I am also the Director of the
`
`Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia.
`
`Additionally, since 1996, I have been an attending neurologist at New York
`
`Presbyterian Hospital, specializing in epilepsy. Since 2006, I have also taught at
`
`the City University of New York. Before joining the medical faculty at Columbia
`
`University in 1996, I served on the faculties at Long Island University (adjunct)
`
`and Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
`
`
`
` My primary research interests are in the areas of epilepsy and sleep 5.
`
`disorders.
`
`6.
`
`
`I received an undergraduate degree in 1983 from the Massachusetts
`
`Institute of Technology. I also have a M.S. in pharmacology and Ph.D. in
`
`- 2 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 4/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`pharmacology from Emory University, and an M.D. from Emory University. After
`
`medical school, I was an intern in internal medicine at Emory University from
`
`1989 to 1990 and then completed a residency in neurology at New York University
`
`from 1990 to 1993. Thereafter, from 1993 to 1995, I completed a clinical
`
`fellowship in epilepsy/EEG at the Neurological Institute, Columbia Presbyterian
`
`Medical Center.
`
`7.
`
`
`I received Board Certification from the National Board of Medical
`
`Examiners in 1990, from the American Board of Clinical Neurophysiology in
`
`1996, and from the American Board of Sleep Medicine in 2005. Additionally, I
`
`received Board Certification from the American Board of Neurology and
`
`Psychiatry in 1995 (last recertified in 2015), with added qualifications in Clinical
`
`Neurophysiology (1999), Sleep Medicine (2009), and Epilepsy (2013).
`
`8.
`
`
`I am the author of more than 160 scientific papers, scholarly reviews,
`
`and book chapters on neurology, including articles on epilepsy, as well as three
`
`books on epilepsy. See, e.g., Carl W. Bazil et al., What Do I Do Now? Epilepsy
`
`(2011) (Ex. 2077) (“What Now?”); Carl W. Bazil et al., Epilepsy, 13 Merritt’s
`
`Neurology 468 (2016) (Ex. 2078); Carl W. Bazil & Timothy A. Pedley, Epilepsy,
`
`12 Merritt’s Neurology 927 (2010); Carl W. Bazil et al., Epilepsy, 11 Merritt’s
`
`Neurology 990 (2005); Carl W. Bazil, Living Well with Epilepsy and Other Seizure
`
`Disorders (2004) (Ex. 2079) (“Living Well”); Carl W. Bazil, Epilepsy:
`
`- 3 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 5/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`Management, 6 Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 487, 487-94 (2002); Carl W. Bazil
`
`et al., Epilepsy, 10 Merritt’s Neurology 813 (2000); Carl W. Bazil & Timothy A.
`
`Pedley, Neurophysiology of antiepileptic drugs. 4 Antiepileptic Drugs 79-89
`
`(1995). I have conducted clinical trials on several antiseizure drugs, including
`
`phase-III trials (pivotal trials used for the approval of drugs for the FDA) for
`
`lacosamide (Vimpat®), pregabalin, and rufinamide, and phase-IV trials (trials
`
`conducted after approval to address additional questions that are of clinical
`
`importance) for zonisamide, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, and diazepam rectal gel.
`
`9.
`
`
`Over the past 21 years, I have held additional professional positions.
`
`From 1995-2008, I served as the Director of Clinical Anticonvulsant Drug Trials at
`
`Columbia University. From 1997-2004, I served as an Examiner for the American
`
`Board of Clinical Neurophysiology. Since 2003, I have served as the Epilepsy
`
`Section Editor for Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. I have served as
`
`a Reviewer for Epilepsia; European Journal of Neurology; Physiology and
`
`Behavior; Annals of Neurology; Archives of Neurology; Sleep; Brain; Clinical
`
`Therapeutics; Neuroscience Letters; Neuropediatrics; Epileptic Disorders; Journal
`
`of Clinical Sleep Medicine; Neuropharmacology; JAMA; JAMA Neurology; and
`
`Epileptic Disorders. I have been a Contributing Editor for Epilepsy Currents and
`
`The Medical Letter. I served as a grant reviewer for Citizens United for Research
`
`in Epilepsy (CURE). I am on the Editorial Board for JAMA Neurology and
`
`- 4 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 6/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`Epilepsy.com and was previously on the Editorial Board for Epilepsy Research. I
`
`also previously served on the Board of Directors for the American Clinical
`
`Neurophysiology Society, the NIH peer review panel, and the AAN Practice
`
`Parameter Guideline Committee on New AEDs.
`
`
`
` Since 2008, I have served as the Director of the Comprehensive 10.
`
`Epilepsy Center at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia, which serves
`
`several thousand patients each year. As director, I am responsible for all activities
`
`of the epilepsy center, which includes nine other neurologists specializing in
`
`epilepsy in addition to myself, three nurse practitioners, between four and seven
`
`epilepsy fellows in training in any given year, as well as neurology residents. In
`
`my role as director, I oversee the clinical care of all of the patients in the Center
`
`seen not only by me, but also the other attending physicians, fellows, and residents.
`
`I also oversee the clinical research performed on anticonvulsant drugs at the
`
`Center.
`
`
`
` Moreover, my group performs an advisory role to the approximately 11.
`
`one hundred other attending neurologists in the neurology department at Columbia.
`
`Epilepsy is a common condition, and it may affect patients who are seeing a
`
`neurologist for another reason. Sometimes, the patent’s caretaker will feel
`
`comfortable with the patient’s epilepsy treatment. However, if they have a
`
`question about a challenging or difficult case of epilepsy, such as epilepsy that is
`
`- 5 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 7/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`difficult to control or instances where the patient experiences problems associated
`
`with other drugs, they come to me and my group for advice on treatment.
`
`12.
`
`
`I have also been invited many times to give lectures and speeches
`
`about epilepsy and the drugs that are available to treat it. For example, for the past
`
`four years I have directed the course in epilepsy therapy at the American Academy
`
`of Neurology annual meeting, the largest meeting in the country for neurologists.
`
`The course I direct is specifically designed to instruct practicing neurologists in the
`
`treatment of epilepsy. The status of available antiseizure drugs (“AEDs”) is an
`
`important topic discussed in this course.
`
`13.
`
`
`I have been caring for patients with epilepsy since medical school in
`
`the 1980s and regularly and consistently since 1990. I currently see approximately
`
`125 patients per month, and approximately 700–1000 patients per year. I have seen
`
`many thousands of patients during my career.
`
`14.
`
`
` A copy of my curriculum vitae is submitted as Ex. 2039 with this
`
`Declaration.
`
`III. The ’551 Patent and My Experience with Lacosamide
`I understand that U.S. Patent No. RE38,551 (“the ’551 Patent”) is
`15.
`
`
`involved in this proceeding. I understand that the claims the ’551 Patent are
`
`directed to the compound of an AED known as lacosamide, and methods of
`
`treatment involving lacosamide. Specifically, I understand (a) that Dr. William
`
`- 6 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 8/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`Roush has opined that the compounds of claims 1–9 encompass lacosamide; (b)
`
`that claim 10 is directed to a “therapeutic composition” containing an
`
`“anticonvulsant effective amount” of any of the compounds of claims 1–9; and (c)
`
`that claims 11–13 are directed to methods of using the compounds of claims 1–9 in
`
`treating central nervous system disorders. I further understand that the Patent Trial
`
`and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) has construed “therapeutic composition” to mean
`
`“suitable for use as a treatment regimen over an extended period of time (chronic
`
`administration)” in this proceeding. I also understand that the year 1996 is the
`
`relevant time in determining the alleged obviousness of the claims of the ’551
`
`patent, although later publications may be relevant to the issues of long-felt need,
`
`failure of others, unexpected results, skepticism, and praise, which I have
`
`addressed in this Declaration.
`
`16.
`
`
`I have had experience prescribing lacosamide since the early 2000s. I
`
`was involved in the clinical trials for lacosamide, and I treated patients using
`
`lacosamide in furtherance of those clinical trials. I have prescribed lacosamide
`
`continuously since then to patients for whom it is appropriate. Lacosamide is the
`
`active ingredient in a composition sold under the trade name, Vimpat®. See FDA
`
`Approved Label for Vimpat® (Ex. 2013).
`
`
`
` As of today, I prescribe Vimpat for patients with partial-onset 17.
`
`epilepsy and I teach others this practice. I have prescribed Vimpat both as a
`
`- 7 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 9/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`primary and as an add-on drug, and have used it in both monotherapy and
`
`polytherapy and over extended periods of time. Based on this practice, I
`
`understand that Vimpat is a “therapeutic composition” as that term has been
`
`construed by the PTAB, suitable for chronic treatment of patients with epilepsy. I
`
`also understand that the administration of an anticonvulsant effective amount of
`
`Vimpat is a method of treating patients with epilepsy (which is a central nervous
`
`system disorder), and I regularly prescribe Vimpat to my patients for this use.
`
`Accordingly, claims 10–13 of the ’551 Patent encompass Vimpat.
`
`IV. Background
`A. Definition and Types of Epilepsy
` Epilepsy is a neurological condition defined as two or more 18.
`
`
`unprovoked seizures occurring more than 24 hours apart. A seizure is defined as a
`
`behavioral change caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain. Seizures can
`
`be caused by many conditions other than epilepsy including very high fever,
`
`infection in the brain, severe hypoglycemia, or certain drugs. A person who has
`
`two, or five, or sixteen seizures due to hypoglycemia does not have epilepsy, as
`
`these would all be considered provoked. The definition of epilepsy mainly arises
`
`from research showing that someone with an isolated, unprovoked seizure has a
`
`good chance of never having another, but that if two or more seizures occur, they
`
`are likely to continue if the person is not treated. Many clinicians will also
`
`- 8 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 10/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`diagnose a person with epilepsy if there is a single seizure plus an EEG
`
`(electroencephalogram) showing risk of epilepsy.
`
`
`
` Epilepsy is one of the most common nervous system disorders, 19.
`
`affecting about 1% of the population. What Now? (Ex. 2077), at 54. It is
`
`estimated to affect 2.5-3 million Americans and 65 million persons worldwide.
`
`See, e.g., “About Epilepsy: The Basics,” Epilepsy Foundation, at
`
`http://www.epilepsy.com/learn/about-epilepsy-basics (last visited July 11, 2016)
`
`(Ex. 2080). Approximately 200,000 new cases of epilepsy are diagnosed each
`
`year.
`
`
`
` Epilepsy is a very heterogeneous condition: it is not a single disease; 20.
`
`rather, it varies considerably between individuals. Epilepsy is sometimes
`
`associated with a condition affecting the structure of the brain: stroke, tumor, or
`
`abnormal blood vessels (arteriovenous malformations), for example. The
`
`spontaneous seizures of epilepsy are more likely to occur following an infection to
`
`the brain, brain trauma (even without a clear structural injury), or repeated febrile
`
`seizures. In the vast majority of individuals, however, no specific cause can be
`
`identified. These are termed “idiopathic,” meaning no definite cause; there is,
`
`however, increasing evidence that many of these people may have a genetic
`
`difference resulting in a predisposition to epilepsy.
`
`- 9 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 11/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`
`
`
` Not only do the causes of epilepsy differ, but the seizures themselves 21.
`
`also vary in manifestations, duration, and severity. The two broadest categories of
`
`epilepsy are “generalized” and “partial” epilepsy. Those categories are
`
`characterized by the electrical pattern in the brain during a given seizure, rather
`
`than by the severity of the seizure. That is, partial seizures can be as severe as, or
`
`even more severe than, generalized seizures, and vice versa.
`
`22.
`
`
`In generalized epilepsy, the brain as a whole seems to be overly
`
`sensitive to seizures. These individuals most commonly experience a “grand mal”
`
`or generalized tonic-clonic seizure (“GTC”). A GTC is what most people think of
`
`as a seizure: the person suddenly loses consciousness; if standing, the person will
`
`fall, typically with a loud outcry followed by diffuse convulsive movements of the
`
`arms and legs. The convulsion will last a minute or two, after which the
`
`movements stop but the person may be unresponsive for minutes or even hours
`
`afterward as the brain recovers. There are still other types of generalized epilepsy,
`
`including absence or “petit mal” seizures, where the person (usually a child)
`
`simply pauses for a few seconds. Sudden increase in muscle tone is called a
`
`“tonic” seizure; sudden loss of muscle tone is called an “atonic” seizure, and
`
`isolated or repetitive muscle jerks with retained awareness is called a “myoclonic”
`
`seizure. These are all generalized seizure types.
`
`- 10 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 12/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`
`
`
` Partial or focal seizures are more common, and result from abnormal 23.
`
`electrical activity beginning in a specific area or areas of the brain. The
`
`manifestations of these seizures depend on the area involved. A seizure beginning
`
`in the visual areas, for instance, may manifest as swirling lights or a specific
`
`hallucination. One of my patients reported usually seeing an image of a cartoon
`
`character as the seizure began. A partial seizure beginning in the area of the brain
`
`that controls movement may start with repetitive, uncontrolled jerking of an arm or
`
`a leg. The most common area for partial seizures to begin is the temporal lobe, an
`
`area closely associated with memory and with emotion. Seizures beginning in that
`
`area therefore can start with an intense feeling of déjà vu, jamais vu (a feeling that
`
`the familiar is somehow unknown), fear, or ecstasy. The Russian author Fyodor
`
`Dostoyevsky famously described his own ecstatic aura through some of the
`
`characters in his novels. Partial seizures, then, can manifest as changes in virtually
`
`any of the functions of the brain. In a given individual, however, seizures tend to
`
`be extremely stereotyped—an electrical fingerprint of sorts for that particular
`
`person.
`
`
`
` Partial seizures also vary in severity. Small partial seizures have been 24.
`
`called “simple partial” when there is no alteration in awareness. A person who
`
`experiences intense déjà vu or sudden jerking movements but remains fully aware,
`
`after which the feeling or movement simply resolves, is experiencing a “simple
`
`- 11 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 13/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`partial” seizure. Simple partial seizures with no outward manifestations—déjà vu
`
`or isolated fear—have also been termed “auras.” If the seizure then spreads to
`
`involve a larger area of the brain, however, the person may become confused and
`
`not remember what had occurred. That is called a “complex partial” seizure.
`
`Partial seizures can spread further to involve the entire brain, resulting in a
`
`convulsion similar to that seen in some people with generalized epilepsy. This is
`
`termed a “secondarily generalized” seizure. For this type of partial seizure, the
`
`seizure could begin with a feeling of déjà vu, for example, followed by staring and
`
`loss of awareness as it spreads, and then result ultimately in the person falling and
`
`experiencing generalized convulsive movements.
`
`
`
` The effects during and after a seizure also vary considerably. A 25.
`
`person who has only a simple partial seizure consisting of an isolated visual change
`
`with no impairment of activity may be able to continue meeting with a client,
`
`taking care of her children, or even driving, with no adverse consequences. During
`
`complex partial seizures, because of impairment, the person is at risk for injury.
`
`For example, a person experiencing confusion during a temporal lobe seizure may
`
`not be aware of oncoming traffic and step in front of a bus, or if cooking, may
`
`place his hand on a hot burner, resulting in a serious burn. During convulsions,
`
`injuries—particularly lacerations, head trauma, or bone fractures—are even more
`
`common due to falling and violent movements. After the seizure stops, the person
`
`- 12 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 14/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`may still be impaired for a period of minutes to hours. For some patients,
`
`particularly those who experience a GTC seizure, once consciousness returns they
`
`may be able to get up and walk, but still be very confused and not remember what
`
`had happened. They may fail to recognize even family members, and may feel
`
`threatened. One of my patients repeatedly was arrested after seizures because he
`
`would act confused and impaired, police would be called, and as he did not
`
`understand questions that the police asked, he would become violent towards them.
`
`Behavioral changes do not just happen immediately after a seizure. Some patients
`
`enter a psychotic state a day or two after a seizure; in those instances, the patient
`
`exhibits schizophrenia-like behavior, including paranoia and delusional thinking,
`
`which can last one to two weeks before resolving. A Christian patient of mine
`
`believed in her postictal state that she had died and was waiting for Jesus to take
`
`her. She refused to eat or take her medications, saying repeatedly “I am dead.
`
`Why should I do that?” Of course, the best treatment of this postictal psychosis is
`
`prevention of all seizures, though it can also be treated with a brief course of
`
`antipsychotic medication.
`
`Effects of Epilepsy
`
`B.
` Epilepsy presents a wide-range of life-altering and potentially long-26.
`
`
`
`standing physical, emotional, psychological, and social effects on those affected.
`
`Epilepsy can take a high toll on both patients and their families. Epilepsy is not a
`
`- 13 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 15/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`benign condition. It can be fatal. Each year, at least 1 in 1000 patients with
`
`epilepsy will die suddenly. See, e.g., Carl W. Bazil, Epilepsy: Management, 6
`
`Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 487, 490 (2002) (Ex. 2081). The causes of such
`
`sudden death cases are poorly understood. See, e.g. id. (Ex. 2081) In patients
`
`with uncontrolled epilepsy (e.g., refractory patients), the death rate is even higher,
`
`at 1 in 100 each year. Stated another way, if a refractory patient is prescribed an
`
`antiepileptic drug that effectively controls his seizures with no serious adverse
`
`effects, he is ten times more likely to live another year. Additionally, patients can
`
`suffer neurological disability or death due to a single prolonged severe seizure
`
`(status epilepticus). The long-term effects of smaller seizures are controversial.
`
`While some patients with partial seizures over many years demonstrate cognitive
`
`impairment, it is unclear whether that is caused by the seizures themselves, or
`
`whether the underlying condition causing epilepsy causes cognitive decline.
`
`
`
` Epilepsy can dramatically curtail the lifestyle and quality of life of 27.
`
`those afflicted. Personal safety is a major concern with patients suffering from
`
`epilepsy also because of the risk of sudden loss of consciousness and other injuries
`
`during seizures—seizures which occur at random and unpredictable times. For any
`
`activity, it is important for a patient with epilepsy to consider the following
`
`question: “What would happen if I had a seizure while doing this?” See, e.g., What
`
`Now? (Ex. 2077), at 185–86.
`
`- 14 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 16/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`
`
`
` Common, everyday activities that a person might otherwise take for 28.
`
`granted, such as driving, climbing stairs, bathing, and cooking, therefore pose a
`
`substantial risk to the epilepsy patient’s health, and avoiding these activities often
`
`decreases their quality of life. Patients with uncontrolled epilepsy are told to
`
`shower instead of bathe to minimize the risk of drowning. Those prone to falls
`
`during seizures may be required to install a shower seat in the shower and replace
`
`glass shower doors with shatterproof doors. Epilepsy patients are advised to cook
`
`when someone else is nearby, if possible; to use the back burners of the stove to
`
`prevent accidental burns; to use shatterproof containers as much as possible (which
`
`may require the transfer of store-bought sauces from glass bottles or jars to plastic
`
`containers); and to try to buy foods that are already cut or otherwise limit time
`
`required using knives or other sharp objects. Under most state driving laws, those
`
`with epilepsy cannot drive unless they demonstrate they have been seizure-free for
`
`a required minimum period of time (3-12 months) and/or submit necessary
`
`physician reports. Furthermore, many patients with epilepsy who are licensed to
`
`drive may still choose not to, so as to minimize the risk of injuring themselves or
`
`others should they suffer a seizure while driving. Restrictions are even more
`
`severe for commercial driving licenses and pilots licenses. This may lead to
`
`unemployment and social isolation, making it difficult for an epilepsy patient to
`
`make friends, buy groceries, get and maintain a job, or find a place to live.
`
`- 15 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 17/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`Epileptic parents are advised to feed, nurse, dress, and change infants while sitting
`
`on the floor, in a well-protected area, and to use a safe play area or playpen if alone
`
`with a child at home, to prevent the child from falling down the stairs or wandering
`
`into an unsafe situation if the parent experiences a seizure. See, e.g., Living Well
`
`(Ex. 2079), at 181–88; 211. Stress and lack of sleep are known to trigger epileptic
`
`seizures, which may further limit the career and lifestyle choices and experiences
`
`available to people with epilepsy.
`
`
`
` Epilepsy not only poses a threat to the personal safety of both those 29.
`
`afflicted and those around them, but it also may cause emotional, psychological,
`
`and social effects. The unpredictable and bizarre nature of seizures may lead to
`
`prejudice and fear in onlookers, as well as to embarrassment in patients. Although
`
`the social stigma of epileptic seizures has declined over the years, it is not gone.
`
`Patients may experience discrimination at work. Employers often have unrealistic
`
`fears about the effects of seizures on employees with epilepsy, the potential for
`
`liability for any work-related incidents, and higher insurance costs.
`
`
`
` Because of the unpredictable nature of epilepsy, those with epilepsy 30.
`
`may choose to avoid certain professions or alter their life goals. They may also
`
`fear and/or avoid being in public places or social settings, which may lead to social
`
`isolation. I have had patients with epilepsy who became completely isolated in
`
`their homes, and even years after their seizures were completely controlled
`
`- 16 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 18/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`continued to have a persistent fear of leaving their house or interacting with
`
`strangers. Epilepsy impacts both the patients themselves and also the family or
`
`friends who care for them. People with epilepsy often must depend on others for
`
`assistance with routine aspects of daily life, and may feel a loss of independence.
`
`
`
` Epilepsy affects people of all ages, races, ethnic, and socioeconomic 31.
`
`backgrounds. It begins most often, however, among the very young and the very
`
`old. One out of every one hundred children in the United States is diagnosed with
`
`epilepsy. The most common cause of epilepsy in children is congenital
`
`malformations. See, e.g., Carl W. Bazil, Epilepsy: Management, 6 Encyclopedia
`
`of Life Sciences 487, 488 (2002) (Ex. 2081). Epilepsy may significantly impact a
`
`child’s education. Absence seizures in children may be mistaken for
`
`inattentiveness, and can contribute to academic underachievement.
`
`
`
` Common causes of epilepsy in the elderly are cerebrovascular and 32.
`
`degenerative diseases. Id. (Ex. 2081) Elderly epilepsy patients may face
`
`additional challenges with respect to treatment and management of their disorder.
`
`Many elderly epilepsy patients have other medical conditions and, therefore, must
`
`be mindful of potential interactions with or effects of their epilepsy medication on
`
`other medications. Additionally, elderly epilepsy patients may be particularly
`
`vulnerable to falls or physical injuries during a seizure and to the cognitive adverse
`
`- 17 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 19/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`effects of some epilepsy medications. Approximately 300,000 senior citizens in
`
`the United States have epilepsy.
`
`33.
`
`
`In addition to children and the elderly, another patient population who
`
`faces special considerations and risks relating to treatment and management of
`
`epilepsy are women of childbearing age. Women of childbearing age must
`
`consider the potential and, in many cases, presently unknown, risks of epilepsy
`
`drug treatments on the developing infant or on fertility and on effectiveness of oral
`
`contraceptive agents.
`
`C. Categories of Epilepsy Treatment
` There is no known medical cure for epilepsy. There are two major 34.
`
`
`approaches to the management of epilepsy: medical and surgical. Medical
`
`approaches include drug therapy and the ketogenic diet. For the overwhelming
`
`majority of epilepsy patients, treatment consists of the long-term—and often life-
`
`long—administration of drugs (commonly referred to as anticonvulsant drugs,
`
`antiseizure drugs, or AEDs) for the prevention of epileptic seizures.
`
`1.
`
`Diet, Devices, and Surgery
`
`35.
`
`
`In rare cases, particularly with children in whom drug treatment has
`
`failed, the ketogenic diet is used. The ketogenic diet is typically used for only 1–2
`
`years in a given patient, but sometimes is used longer. This diet is designed to
`
`mimic a state of starvation in patients, which in some individuals can improve
`
`- 18 -
`
`Argentum Pharm. v. Research Corp. Techs., IPR2016-00204
`RCT EX. 2038 - 20/72
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00204
`
`seizure control. The ketogenic diet severely restricts carbohydrates, such that the
`
`majority of calories are from protein and fat. Under these circumstances, the brain
`
`is forced to use ketone bodies (derived from fat and protein) rather than glucose as
`
`fuel. As this is difficult to administer and maintain, and can severely interfere with
`
`a patient’s lifestyle, it is usually not a good option, particularly in adults. See, e.g.,
`
`What Now? (Ex. 2077), at 147.
`
`
`
` Additionally, there are two surgically implanted devices approved in 36.
`
`the United States for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. The vagus nerve
`
`stimulator is a FDA-approved device that consists of a cuff surgically placed over
`
`one of the major cranial nerves, the vagus. Wires lead into a battery placed in t

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket