throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`SL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ADAPTIVE HEADLAMP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`________________
`
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,241,034
`
`Issue Date: July 10, 2007
`
`Reexamination Certificate Issue Date: June 14, 2013
`
`Title: Automatic Directional Control System for Vehicle Headlights
`
`________________
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-00193
`
`DECLARATION OF ADAM P. SAMANSKY
`
`Page 1 of 5
`SL Corporation v. Adaptive Headlamp
`
` Technologies, Inc.
`
` SL Corporation Exhibit 1028
` Case IPR2016-00193
`
`

`

`I, Adam P. Samansky, do hereby declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in the law firm of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
`
`and Popeo P.C. (“Mintz Levin”). Current lead counsel in this inter partes review
`
`proceeding is Peter Cuomo, who is Of Counsel and is registered to practice before
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office and holds Registration No. 54,481.
`
`The back-up counsel Kongsik Kim and Serge Subach are also registered to practice
`
`before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and hold Registration Nos.
`
`63,867 and 74,652, respectively. During this proceeding, I will work closely with
`
`Mr. Cuomo and back-up counsel.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the Commonwealth of
`
`Massachusetts and the State of New York. My Massachusetts Bar membership is
`
`661123. My New York Bar membership is 493582. I am admitted to practice
`
`before the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States Court of Appeals
`
`for the Federal Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, United
`
`States District Court for the District of Columbia, United States District Court for
`
`the District of Massachusetts, United States District Court for the Eastern District
`
`of New York, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York,
`
`and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 5
`SL Corporation v. Adaptive Headlamp
`
` Technologies, Inc.
`
` SL Corporation Exhibit 1028
` Case IPR2016-00193
`
`

`

`3.
`
`I am admitted, pro hac vice, and am lead trial counsel in the
`
`underlying litigation before the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware,
`
`Case No. 1:15-cv-0565.
`
`4.
`
`In addition, my 12 years of litigation practice I currently represent or
`
`have represented clients in numerous, electrical, mechanical and chemical, patent
`
`litigation cases in various United States courts. Those actions include among
`
`others:
`
`Inline Plastics Corp. v. EasyPak, LLC, Appeal No. 14-1305 (Fed. Cir.)
`
` MeadWestvaco v. Rexam, Appeal No. 12-1518 (Fed. Cir.)
` UbiComm v. Bulbs.com, 1;13-cv-00872-RGA (D. Del.)
` Dallakian v. IPG Photonics, 3:14-cv-11863-TSH (D. Mass.)
`Select Retrieval v. Bulbs.com, 4:12-cv-10389-TSH (D. Mass.)
`
`Samson Manufacturing v. Austin Precision Products, 1:09-cv-30027 (D. Mass.)
`
`Superior Shooting Systems v. Cole, 3:10-cv-01226 (N.D. Tex)
`
` Mitsubishi Chem. Co. v. Barr Labs., Inc., 718 F. Supp. 2d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2010), aff’d,
`435 Fed. Appx. 927 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 2, 2011)
` Wellman, Inc., v. Eastman Chem. Co., 642 F.3d 1355 (2011), reh’g and reh’g en banc
`denied (Aug. 11, 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1541 (2012)
`Takeda Chem. Indus., Ltd. v. Alphapharm Pty., Ltd., 492 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2007), cert.
`denied, 552 U.S. 1295 (2008)
`Takeda Chem. Indus., Ltd. v. Mylan Labs. Inc., 417 F. Supp. 2d 341 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)
`Takeda Chem. Indus., Ltd. v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 549 F.3d 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2008), cert.
`denied, 552 U.S. 1295 (2009)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`In addition to my J.D. obtained from Suffolk University, I hold a B.S.
`
`in Politics from Brandeis University. Accordingly, I am comfortable and
`
`experienced with technically and legally complex matters such as those raised in
`
`this inter partes review proceeding. In particular, I am experienced with
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 5
`SL Corporation v. Adaptive Headlamp
`
` Technologies, Inc.
`
` SL Corporation Exhibit 1028
` Case IPR2016-00193
`
`

`

`technically and legally complex matters in the fields of electrical and mechanical
`
`engineering.
`
`6.
`
`I am familiar with U.S. Patent No. 7,241,034 (“the ‘034 patent”), its
`
`prosecution history, and the legal subject matter, technical subject matter, and prior
`
`art discussed in Petitioner’s request for inter partes review of the ‘034 patent.
`
`7.
`
`I was substantially involved with the preparation of the Petition filed
`
`in this proceeding. In particular, I have worked with former lead counsel David
`
`Cotta and pending replacement lead counsel Peter Cuomo on scientific and
`
`strategic matters pertaining to the instant Petition and now-instituted IPR
`
`proceeding. As a result, I anticipate being significantly involved in the deposition
`
`and trial phase of this proceeding.
`
`8.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body, nor has a court or administrative body denied my
`
`application for admission to practice. I have not been sanctioned or cited for
`
`contempt by any court or administrative body.
`
`9.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Patent Office Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`10.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 5
`SL Corporation v. Adaptive Headlamp
`
` Technologies, Inc.
`
` SL Corporation Exhibit 1028
` Case IPR2016-00193
`
`

`

`11. I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements are made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
` Respectfully bm tted,
`
`Adam P. Sarnansky
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
`GLOVSKY AND POPEO P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`(617) 542-6000
`
`Dated: June 24, 2016
`
`49654654v.1
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 5
`SL Corporation v. Adaptive Headlamp
`
` Technologies, Inc.
`
` SL Corporation Exhibit 1028
` Case IPR2016-00193
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket