`
`Attorney’s Docket No.: P-9047-US3
`
`PATENT
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In Re Patent Application of:
`
`Daniel Sclireiber
`Andrew Goldman
`
`Examiner: Beemnet W. Dada
`
`Art Unit:
`
`2135
`
`\.d\./&/\/\/\/%€$/\/\/é%4’
`
`Application No: 09/730,326
`
`Filed: December 4, 2000
`
`For:
`
`COPYRIGHT PROTECTION OF
`DIGITAL IMAGES TRANSMITTED
`OVER NETWORKS
`
`Mail Stop AMENDMENT
`Commissioner for Patents
`P. O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION
`
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. §l.1 1 1
`
`Sir:
`
`pursuant
`
`to
`
`In response to the Office Action dated July 27, 2005 and
`37 C.F.R. §1.1lI,
`applicant‘
`respectfully requests
`that
`the
`
`above-identified application be amended as follows.
`
`Atty. Docket No. I>—9o47-Us3V
`
`.
`
`_‘
`
`-1-
`
`7 .
`
`.'-Pa|oA|toNetworks,"Inc.‘ Exhibit 1614
`
`Page’1
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 1
`
`

`

`IN THE CLAIMS:
`
`Please substitute the following claims for the pending claims
`
`with the same number:
`
`I. (currently amended)
`
`A method for protecting files distributed over a
`
`network, comprising:
`retrieving, at an administrative computer, a site map of folders
`
`and files within a server computer file system, the administrative computer being
`
`remote from the server computer and communicatively coupled therewith;
`
`displaying, by the administrative computer, the site map to a
`
`user;
`
`generating, by the administrative computer, protection status
`information in response to selection by the user of a p1uralit_v_ of the
`files in the site map, the protection status information designating the at-least-eae
`
`plurality of the-files selected by the user as being protected files;
`sending the protection status information from the administrative
`
`computer to the server computer;
`downloading, by a client computer, at least one file from the
`
`server computer; and
`copy-protecting the at least one file by copy—protection software
`running on the client computer, if the at
`least one file is designated by the
`
`protection status information as being protected.
`
`IU
`
`LII-I-‘-bl
`
`N
`
`tv
`
`2-bl
`
`The method of claim 1 wherein said displaying
`2. (currently amended)
`displays the site map together with a corresponding protection status for each file
`in the site map, and wherein the method further comprises modifying protection
`status of a pluralig of the-files, and wherein said sending sends
`
`modified protection status information to the server computer.
`
`3. (original)
`
`The method of claim 1
`
`further comprising recording the
`
`protection status information in a protection status database.
`
`4. (currently amended)
`
`A system for protecting files distributed over
`
`a
`
`network, comprising:
`a user interface within an administrative computer, for displaying
`
`a site map of folders and files in a server computer file system, the administrative
`
`Atty Dc:,é1<etNo.P-9Q347—US3
`
`.
`
`in
`
`_
`
`-2-
`
`Pa|oA|to*Networks,-|nc.. ‘Exhibit1014'
`
`PagAe2
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 2
`
`

`

`computer being remote from the server computer and communicatively coupled
`
`therewith;
`
`a protection status manager within the administrative computer,
`
`for generating protection status information in response to selection by a user ofat
`
`least—ene-a pluraligg of the-files in the site map, the protection status information
`
`designating the at—-least—ene-plurality of t-he—files selected by the user as being
`
`protected files;
`
`a transmitter within the administrative computer, for sending the
`
`protection status information from the administrative computer to the server
`
`computer; and
`
`a copy-protection module residing on a client computer,
`
`_f_o_r
`
`copy-protecting at
`
`least one file downloaded from the server computer to the
`
`client computer if the at
`
`least one file is designated by the protection status
`
`information as being protected.
`
`5. (currently amended)
`
`The system of claim 4 wherein said user interface
`
`displays the site map together with a corresponding protection status for each file
`in the site map, and wherein the protection status manager modifies protection
`status of a plurality of tke~fi1es, and wherein said transmitter sends
`
`modified protection status information to the server computer.
`
`The system of claim 4 further comprising a database
`6. (currently amended)
`manager _f_Ql_” recording the protection status information in a protection status
`database.
`
`7. (currently amended)
`
`A method for protecting files distributed over a
`
`network, comprising:
`
`retrieving, at an administrative computer, a site map of folders
`
`and files within a server computer file system, the administrative computer being
`remote from-the server computer and communicatively coupled therewith;
`
`displaying, by the administrative computer,
`
`the site map to a
`
`user;
`
`generating, by the administrative computer, protection status
`
`information in response to selection by the- user of a plurality‘ of the
`
`files in the site map, the protection status information designating the at—least—ene
`
`plurality of the—flles selected by the user‘ as being protected files;
`
`5 6 7 8
`
`9 0
`
`I
`
`I
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`IS
`
`I6
`
`17
`
`is
`
`1
`IV
`
`U1-X‘—\»J
`
`I
`l\J
`
`3
`
`I
`Ix)
`
`5ooo,\lmu:.:~_:..4
`
`I I
`
`Atty Doc_ke_t No P-90-47—US3_
`
`-3-
`
`‘
`
`‘F-’a|o_A|to Netwo'rks.,-Inc.‘ Exh'ibit1014
`
`Pa'ge_3
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 3
`
`

`

`Iv
`
`U1-E-la)
`
`Iv
`
`¢-Lu
`
`lu
`
`(U
`
`Lu
`
`J?-
`
`©OO\lG\UI
`
`sending the protection status information from the administrative
`
`computer to the server computer; and
`
`encrypting at least one file on the server computer, if the at least
`
`one file is designated by the protection status information as being protected.
`
`8. (previously presented) The method of claim 7 further comprising, in response
`
`to a request from a client computer to download an unencrypted file residing on
`
`the server computer, transmitting an encrypted file to the client computer instead
`
`of the requested unencrypted file, if" the requested unencrypted file is designated
`
`by the protection status information as being protected.
`
`9. (previously presented) The method of" claim 8 further comprising decrypting
`
`the encrypted file by decoding software running on the client computer,
`
`subsequent to the client computer receiving the encrypted file from the server
`
`computer.
`
`10. (previously presented) The method of claim 7 wherein the at least one file on
`
`the server computer is at least one image file..
`
`11. (currently amended)
`
`A system for protecting files distributed over
`
`a
`
`network, comprising:
`
`a user interface within an administrative computer, for displaying
`
`a site map of folders and files in a server computer file system, the administrative
`
`computer being remote from the server computer and communicatively coupled
`therewith;
`
`a protection status manager within the administrative computer,
`
`for generating protection status infomiation in response to selection by a user of at
`least—ene—a plurality of t-he-files in the site map, the protection status information
`designating the pluralig of the—files selected by the user as being
`
`protected files;
`
`a transmitter‘ within the administrative computer, for sending the
`
`protection status information from the administrative computer to the server
`
`computer; and
`
`an encoder‘
`
`for encrypting at
`
`least one file on the server
`
`computer, if the at least one file is designated by the protection status information
`
`as being protected.
`
`Atty Docket No. P-9D,47—US3
`
`_-4-
`
`:
`
`i
`
`,l_3a|oA1toNetworks,‘|nc.
`
`'E$<hibit.1o‘1zi
`
`Pag'e4'
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 4
`
`

`

`1
`
`[xi
`
`Lu
`
`ONUIJD.
`
`Iv
`
`Lu
`
`lu
`
`IQ
`
`.l.‘.L».I
`
`lu
`
`Lu
`
`12. (currently amended)
`
`The system of claim 11 further comprising a file copy
`
`protector on the server computer fig controlling the server computer to transmit,
`
`in response to receiving a request from a client computer to download an
`
`unencrypted file on the server computer, an encrypted file instead of the requested
`
`unencrypted file, if the requested unencrypted file is designated by the protection
`
`status information as being protected.
`
`13. (currently amended)
`
`The system of claim 12 further comprising a decoder
`
`residing on the client computer, for decrypting the encrypted file received by the
`
`client computer from the server computer.
`
`‘
`
`14. (previously presented) The system of claim 11 wherein the at least one file on
`
`the server computer is at least one image file.
`
`15. (currently amended)
`
`method for protecting files distributed over a
`
`network, comprising:
`
`retrieving, at an administrative computer, a site map of’ folders
`
`and files within a server computer file system, the administrative computer being
`
`remote from the server computer and communicatively coupled therewith;
`
`displaying, by the administrative computer, the site map to a
`
`user;
`
`«
`
`generating, by the administrative computer, protection status
`
`’
`
`information in response to selection by the user of' a plurality of the
`
`files in the site map, the protection status information designating the a%—least~—ene
`
`pluralig of t-he-files selected by the user as being protected files;
`
`_
`
`sending the protection status information from the administrative
`
`computer to the server computer; and
`
`in response to a request from a client computer to download an
`
`unencrypted file residing on the server computer, transmitting an encrypted file to
`
`the client computer instead of the requested unencrypted file, if the requested
`
`unencrypted file is designated by the protection statue as being protected.
`
`16. (currently amended)
`
`A system for protecting files distributed over a
`
`network, comprising:
`
`a user" interface within an administrative computer, for displaying
`
`a site map of" folders and files in a server computer file system, the administrative
`
`Atty. Docket No.P—9047—US3
`
`_
`
`_
`
`-5-‘ A
`
`- PaloA|to~N_etworl{s,']nc.,,'E>§hib]t1.044 ,
`
`r'=_age'5 .
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 5
`
`

`

`O\OOO\JO\UI
`
`Ix)
`
`tu
`
`l\J
`
`N
`
`Ix!
`
`IV
`
`lu
`
`computer being remote from the server computer and communicatively coupled
`
`therewith;
`
`a protection status manager within the administrative computer,
`for generating protection status infomiation in response to selection by a user of at
`least—ene-a plurality of _the—files in the site map, the protection status information
`designating the plurality of t-lae—files selected by the user as being
`
`protected files;
`
`a transmitter within the administrative computer, for sending the
`
`protection status information from the administrative computer to the server
`
`computer; and
`
`a file copy protector on the server computer for controlling the
`
`server computer to transmit, in response to receiving a request from a client
`
`computer to download an unencrypted file on the server computer, an encrypted
`file instead of the requested unencrypted file, if the requested unencrypted file is
`
`designated by the protection status information asbeing protected.
`
`17. (previously presented) The method of claim 1 wherein the copy-protection
`software running on the client computer blocks the ability to capture data of a file
`being displayed on a computer screen.
`7
`
`18. (previously presented) The method of claim 17 wherein the file being
`
`displayed is an image file.
`
`19. (previously presented) The system of claim 4 wherein the copy—protection
`
`module residing on the client computer blocks the ability to capture data of a file
`
`being displayed on a computer screen.
`
`20. (previously presented) The system of claim 19 wherein the file being
`
`displayed is an image file.
`
`21. (previously presented) The method of claim 1 wherein said generating
`
`generates protection status information designating all image files within a folder
`
`as being protected, in response to selection by the user of the folder.
`
`22. (previously presented) The method of claim 1 wherein said generating
`
`generates protection status information designating all
`
`image files referenced
`
`Atty. Docket No. P-9047-US3 _
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`56: A
`
`'
`
`,
`
`A
`
`3'
`
`‘Pale’/Alto Networks;1ne'._"Exhibit‘1614 ‘sages '
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 6
`
`

`

`within an web page as being protected, in response to selection by the user of the
`
`web page.
`
`23. (previously presented) The system of claim 4 wherein said protection status
`
`- manager generates protection status information designating all image files within
`
`a folder as being protected, in response to selection by the user of the folder.
`
`The system of claim 4 wherein said protection status
`24. (previously presented)
`manager generates protection status information designating all
`image files
`
`referenced within an web page as being protected, in response to selection by the
`
`user of the web page.
`
`25. (currently amended) A method of protecting files distributed over a
`
`network, comprising:
`
`retrieving, at an administrative computer, a site map of folders
`
`and files within a server computer file system, the administrative computer being
`
`remote from the server computer and communicatively coupled therewith;
`
`displaying, by the administrative computer,
`
`the site map to a
`
`user;
`
`‘generating, by the administrative computer, protection status
`
`information in response to selection by the user of a plurality of the
`
`files in the site map, the protection status information designating the at-least-eae
`
`pluralig oftlae-files selected by the user as being protected files;
`
`sending the protection status information from the administrative
`
`computer‘ to the server computer;
`.
`receiving, by the server computer, a request
`
`from a client
`
`computer for data within a file that
`
`is designated by the protection status
`
`infomiation as being protected; and
`
`sending substitute data from the server computer to the client
`
`computer in response to the request.
`
`26. (currently amended)
`
`A system for protecting files distributed over a
`
`network, comprising:
`
`a user interface within an administrative computer, for displaying
`
`a site map of folders and files in a server computer file system, the administrative
`
`computer being remote from the server computer and comrnunicatively coupled
`
`therewith;
`
`N h
`
`a
`
`IU
`
`&bJ
`
`CU
`
`_C—\OO0\lO\UIJ‘.LcJ
`
`to
`
`O\UI-D-ha
`
`Atty. Docl<etNo. 1>—9oil7—Us3
`
`_
`
`—..
`
`_’ " ',
`
`.‘
`
`'
`
`-V7
`
`-
`
`.
`
`-
`
`-7-
`
`l
`
`_ "'F*a|oA1to‘Networks,‘Inc;
`
`Exhitiit‘10'14
`
`-‘Pager
`
`‘
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 7
`
`

`

`a protection status manager within the administrative computer,
`
`for generating protection status information in response to selection by a user of at
`
`£east—eae—a plurality of t-he-files in the site map, the protection status information
`
`designating the at—least—ene pluralig of tlae—files selected by the user as being
`
`protected files;
`
`a transmitter within the administrative computer, for sending the
`
`protection status information from the administrative computer to the server
`
`computer; and
`
`a file copy protector on the server computer for controlling the
`
`server computer to send substitute data to a client computer,
`
`in response to
`
`receiving a request from the client computer for data within a file that
`
`is
`
`designated by theprotection status information as being protected.
`
`Acryqoocket Nb. P—9l)47—US3
`
`A
`
`-3-
`
`Palo Alto Networks’, ‘Inc; Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 8
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 8
`
`

`

`REMARKS
`
`Applicants have carefully studied the outstanding Office Action.
`
`The present response is intended to overcome all of the objections and rejections
`
`made by the Examiner.
`
`Favorable reconsideration and allowance of the
`
`application are respectfully requested.
`
`Applicants have amended claims 1, 2, 4 - 7, 11 - 13, 15, 16, 25
`and 26. No ‘new matter has been added. Claims 1 - 26 are presented for
`examination.
`
`In Paragraphs 4 - 10 of the Office Action, claims 1 - 6 and 17 ~
`
`26 have been rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Glogau, WO 98/25373 (“Glogau”) in view of Erickson, U.S. Patent No. 5,765,152
`
`(“Ericl<son)_
`
`In Paragraphs 1] - 15 of the Office Action, claims 7 - 16 have
`
`been rejected under 35 U.S.C. §l03 (a) as being unpatentable over Glogau in View
`of Granger et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,480,959 (“Granger”) and further in view of
`Erickson.
`
`In Paragraph 6 of the Office Action,
`
`in rejecting independent
`
`claims 1, 4, 25 and 26, and similarly in Paragraph 12 of the Office Action, in
`
`rejecting independent claims 7, I1, 15 and 16, the Examiner has indicated that (i)
`
`“Glogau does not explicitly teach an admim'stra!ive computer for retrieving a site
`
`map of folclers and files wit'Iu'n a server computer file system ....”; and (ii)
`
`“Erickson teaches a system and method, for
`
`retrieving a sire map offolders and
`
`files within a server computerfile system ...”
`
`In their amendment and response filed on March 24, 2004,
`
`applicants presented arguments showing that Erickson operates on individual
`
`documents, and does not describe retrieving a site map of folders and files within
`
`a computer file system from a server computer to a remote administration
`
`computer. The Examiner has cited elements of FIG; 9 of Erickson and the
`
`discussion thereof" at cols. 25 and 26. Applicant respectively submits that the
`
`locations cited do not disclose sending or receiving a site map of folders and files,
`The communication lines 212 and 218 in FIG. 9 of Erickson are used to transmit
`
`documents 204a-d.
`
`In this regard, an important distinction between the present
`invention and Erickson is that by retrieving a site map of folders and files from a
`
`server computer, the present invention enables a remote administrator to modify
`
`protection settings for an entire site at once,
`
`locally on the administrator’s
`
`computer. As described on page 43, lines 16 - 2] of the present specification,
`
`' Atty. Docl<et.No. P-9047-USS
`
`-9-
`
`‘Palo Alto’ Networks,_ Inc.’
`
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Page 9
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 9
`
`

`

`“Until the user clicks on the ‘Submit’ button, the protection settings he edited are
`
`only displayed within the protection management tool by his local computer.
`
`Only when he clicks the ‘submit’ button are his settings actually applied Ifthe
`
`user does not click on the ‘Submit’ button, then all of the protection settings he
`
`edited will not take eflect, and the protection settings will remain at their ,former
`
`state if"he closes the screen.” Similarly, as described on page 24, lines 11 — 18 of
`
`the present specification, with respect to FIG. 3, “Clicking on the ‘submit’ button
`
`causes protection settings 306 to be transmitted firom remote computer 130 to
`
`server computer 100. When server computer 100 receives the modified protection
`
`.
`
`. settings, it incorporates them into protection status database 118.”
`
`Such capability to remotely set protection settings for an entire
`
`site at once, as set forth in independent claims 1, 4, 7, 11, 15, 16, 25 and 26, is not
`disclosed in Erickson.
`
`In order to fiirther distinguish the independent claims over
`
`Erickson, which operates on one document at a time, applicant has amended these
`
`claims to include the limitation of" setting protection status for a plurality of files.
`
`For ease of reference, applicants are including excerpts from that
`
`March 24, 2004 response hereinbelow.
`
`Distinctions between Claimed Invention and U.S. Patent No. 5,765,152 to
`
`Erickson
`
`The present invention concerns copy protection ofdigital images
`
`stored on a server computer and available for viewing over the Internet. A remote
`
`administration tool provides an explorer-type interface for an administrator to set
`
`protection status of digital image files. Specifically, as disclosed in the present
`
`specification and as illustrated in the user interface of FIG. 13, protection manager
`
`128 (FIG. 1) in remote computer 130 controls protection status of digital image
`
`files 108 and 110 resident on server computer 100. Steps 412 — 434 (FIG. 4)
`
`disclose computer 130 receiving a site map of folders and files from the file
`
`system of computer 100, selecting by a user of computer 130 at least one folder or
`
`file, and editing the at least one folder or file’s protection status. After setting
`
`protection status for selected files, computer 130 sends the protection statuses to
`
`server computer 100, which enforces the protection (original specification / page
`
`line 10; protection manager 128 of FIG. 1 and the
`line 18 — page 17,
`15,
`discussion thereof at page 20, lines 7 —— 14; FIG. 3' and the discussion thereof‘ at
`
`page 22, line 25 — page 24, line 21; FIG. 4 and the discussion thereof at page 24,
`
`line 22 - page 27, line 2; user interface illustrated in FIG. 13 and the discussion
`
`thereof at page 41, line 16 — page 42, lines 22).
`
`Atty. Docket No, P-9047-US3
`
`-10$
`
`‘ x “
`
`7-
`
`Palo Alto Networks,.|nc. ‘ Exhibit T014
`
`Page‘10"-_
`
`i
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 10
`
`

`

`Erickson concerns copyright management of digital media.
`
`Copyright protected media is stored within a document container that includes a
`
`minimum set of permissions granted, such as permission to view an image, for
`
`accessing the media. A user can obtain auxiliary permissions, such as permission
`
`to save, modify and print the image, through an authorization server that controls
`
`licenses to the media (Erickson / col. 2, lines 18 — 44).
`
`Unlike Erickson, which operates on «individual documents, the
`
`present invention operates on an entire file system.
`
`In particular, the document
`
`PACKAGER of Erickson only sets permissions for an individual document
`
`currently being worked on. within the PACKAGER, and does not
`
`include
`
`selection of a list of files for setting protection status. Moreover, Erickson does
`
`not describe sending and receiving a site map of folders and files within a
`
`computer file system from a sewer computer to a remote management computer.
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that the DOCUMENT-packaged
`
`source works in Erickson do not refer to ‘separate files, but instead refer to
`
`derivative works encapsulated within a single document,
`
`in the sense of
`
`copyright. Specifically, at col. 11, line 65, Erickson recites “The Source Works
`
`Extension 24 provides a bibliographic record, or ‘persistence, ’ ofcopyright uses
`
`through generation of derivative work
`
`For example,
`
`information about
`
`successive derivative authors of the DOCUMENT 20 are stored sequentially as a
`
`Source Works Extension 24. By way of another example, one Source Work
`
`Extension 24 can include the release information for any performer whose image
`
`or audio likeness appears in the current DOCUMENT.”
`
`Support for Amended Claims in Original Specification
`
`The limitation of setting protection status for a plurality of files is
`
`described in the original specification at page 23, line 25 - page 24, line 10; page
`
`26, lines 7 — 13; page 42, lines 3 —— 9 and lines 17 - 22; and FIG. 13.
`
`Atty. Docket No. P-904741153
`
`-
`
`-11-
`
`"
`
`Palo A_|to Netvi/orks,.’|n‘c. -‘,E5<h'ibit1.014~-'P'age:1t-' ‘~31;
`
`.
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 11
`
`

`

`For the foregoing reasons, applicant respectfully submits that the
`
`applicable objections and rejections have been overcome and that the claims are in
`condition for allowance"
`
`
`
`Attomey for Applicant(s)
`Registration No. 43,116
`
`Dated: December 5, 2005
`
`Eitan Law Group
`C/O Landon IP Inc.
`
`1700 Diagonal Road, Suite 450
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`Tel: (703) 486-1150
`Fax: (703) 892-4510
`
`
`
`Atty. Docket No. P—9047—US3
`
`A
`
`V
`
`-12-
`
`.x:. ’
`
`-I
`
`I
`
`_. ~F§a_|o A|'to-‘Net—works,J.r.1c.
`
`‘EXbibit1014 "Page1'2
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 12
`
`

`

`4-05)
`PTO/SB/30
`Approved for use through 07/31/2006. OMB 065t~0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number.
`
`-.
`
`
`
`
`
`Application Number
`09/730,326
`REQUEST 0
`FOR P
`°°”T'““E° EXA“"'“‘“'°“ (RCE)E
`TRANSMITTAL
`DAM Beemnet W-
`
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`This is a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) under 37 C.F.R. § 1.114 of the above-identified application.
`Request for Continued Examination (RCE) practice under 37 CFR 1.114 does not apply to any utility or plant application filed prior to June 8.
`1995, or to any design application. See Instruction Sheet for RCEs (not to be submitted to the USPTO) on page 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Submission re uired under 37 C.F.R. _~ 1.114
`Note: If the RCE is proper, any previously filed unentered amendments and amendments enclosed with the RCE will be entered
`in the order in which they were filed unless applicant instructs otherwise. If applicant does not wish to have any previously filed
`unentered amendment(s) entered, applicant must request non-entry of such amendment(s).
`
`a.
`
`['_'] Previously submitted. If a final Office action is outstanding, any amendments filed after the final Office action may
`be considered as a submission even if this box is unchecked.
`
`['_']
`
`[:1
`
`ii.
`
`Consider the amendment(s)/reply under 37 C.F.R. § 1.116 previously filed on
`
`Other
`
`b. E Enclosed
`
`i. E Amendment/Reply
`
`ii.
`
`[I
`
`Affidavit(s)lDeclaration(s)
`
`iii.
`
`iv.
`
`[:1 Information Disclosure Statement(lDS)
`
`El Other
`
`2.
`
`Miscellaneous
`
`a. D Suspension of action on the above-identified application is requested under 37 C.F.R. § 1.103(c)
`for a period of
`months. (Period of suspension shall not exceed 3 months; Fee under 37 C.F.R. §.17(i) required)
`
`b. D Other
`
`3.
`a.
`
`Fee
`The RCE fee under 37 C.F.R. § 1.17 (D) is required by 37 C.F.R. § 1.114 when the RCE is filed.
`S
`>2 The Director is hereby authorized to charge the. following fees, or credit any overpayments, to
`Deposit Account No. 50-3400.
`
`i.
`
`#2
`
`RCE fee required under 37 C.F.R. § 1.17(e)
`
`ii. Q Extension oftime fee (37 C.F.R. §§ 1.136 and 1.17)
`iii.
`[:1
`Other
`
`El Check in the amount of
`
`5
`
`1:] Payment by credit card (Form PTO-2038 enclosed)
`
`SIGNATURE APPLICANI - ORNEY, OR AGENT REQUIRED
`
`
`
`0000004709730326
`
`
`12/14/2005HALI11
`
`790.00B0
`
`
`
`'01FC:1801
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF MAILING OR TRANSMISSION
`I hereby certify that this correspondence is being deposited with the United States Postal Service with sufficient postage as first class mail in an envelope
`addressed tozcommissioner for Patents Box RCE Washin on D.C. 20231. or facsimile transmitted to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on: *
`
`
`Name
`(Pn'nl/Type)
`—
`
`
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR_1.1 14. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the
`USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes
`to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed appllcatlon form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual
`case. Any comments on the amount at time you require to complete this form andlor suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief
`Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 223134450. DO NOT SEND FEES
`OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Mall Stop RCE, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
`22313-1450.
`
`;
`E
`7
`E
`
`If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 and select option 2. ,
`
`'
`
`'
`
`‘ ‘
`
`-‘
`
`_ "
`
`_
`
`.
`
`_
`
`._
`
`01.££.-180,4’
`
`_
`
`.
`
`_:
`'
`
`‘
`
`’
`
`. Palo Alto Networks, Inc,
`3
`
`Exhibit 1014 . Page 13
`'
`
`Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Exhibit 1014 Page 13
`
`