throbber

`
`
`
`Paper No.
`Filed: November 24, 2015
`
`
`Filed on behalf of: Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd.
`
`By: Naveen Modi (nVidia-Samsung-IPR@paulhastings.com)
`
`Joseph E. Palys (nVidia-Samsung-IPR@paulhastings.com)
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NVIDIA CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00134
`Patent No. 8,252,675
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. (“Samsung”), the Patent Owner,
`
`Case IPR2016-00134
`Patent 8,252,675
`
`
`provides the following mandatory notices pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8.
`
`I.
`
`Real Party-in-Interest
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), the real party-in-interest is Samsung
`
`Electronics Company, Ltd., the assignee of record for U.S. Patent No. 8,252,675
`
`(“the ‘675 patent”).
`
`II. Related matters
`Patent Owner identifies the following matters that may be deemed related
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2).
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`
`A.
`The ’675 patent, which is the subject of this proceeding, is at issue in
`
`IPR2015-01318.
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving Related Patents
`
`B.
`No proceeding that involves a patent or application related to the ’675 patent
`
`is currently before the USPTO.
`
`C. U.S. Patent Applications Related to the Patent-at-Issue
`No U.S. patent application claims the benefit of the ’675 patent.
`
`D. Litigations Involving the Patent-at-Issue and/or Related Patents
`The ’675 patent is at issue in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. NVIDIA
`
`Corp. et al., 3:14-cv-00757-REP (E.D.Va.).
`
` 1
`
`
`
`

`

`III. Lead and Back-Up Counsel and Service Information
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3) and (b)(4), Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2016-00134
`Patent 8,252,675
`
`
`identifies the following lead and back-up counsel and service information:
`
`Lead counsel: Naveen Modi (Reg. No. 46,224), Paul Hastings LLP, 875
`
`15th St. N.W., Washington DC, 20005, Telephone: 202.551.1990, Fax:
`
`202.551.0490, Email: nVidia-Samsung-IPR@paulhastings.com.
`
`Backup counsel: Joseph E. Palys (Reg. 46,508), Paul Hastings LLP, 875
`
`15th St. N.W., Washington, DC, 20005, Telephone: 202.551.1996, Fax:
`
`202.551.0496, Email: nVidia-Samsung-IPR@paulhastings.com.
`
`Patent Owner consents to electronic service.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 24, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
` /Naveen Modi/
`Naveen Modi
`Reg. No. 46,224
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`2
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case IPR2016-00134
`Patent 8,252,675
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that on November 24, 2015 I
`
`caused to be served on the counsel for Petitioner a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Patent Owner’s Mandatory Notice pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, by
`
`electronic means on Counsel for Petitioner at the following addresses of record:
`
`Robert Steinberg (Bob.steinberg@lw.com)
`Clement Naples (Clement.Naples@lw.com)
`Julie Holloway (Julie.Holloway@lw.com)
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /Naveen Modi/
`Naveen Modi
`Reg. No. 46,224
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 24, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket