throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 14
`Entered: March 4, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00118
`Patent 8,155,342 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, and HUNG H. BUI,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00118
`Patent 8,155,342 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A conference call in this proceeding took place on March 4, 2016. The
`
`parties were represented by their respective counsel. The conference was
`requested by the Board to discuss Petitioner’s request for authorization to
`file a renewed motion to seal.
`
`Petitioner asserted that the identity of its membership is confidential.
`The Board pointed out that information identifying Petitioner’s members is
`available to the public on its website, www.unified.com. Petitioner agreed
`to review the redactions to Patent Owner’s preliminary response in light of
`this information.
`
`Petitioner also asserted that information regarding the provisions of its
`membership agreements as disclosed in Exhibits 2007–2011 is confidential.
`The Board asked the parties to meet and confer to work on a stipulation that
`will avoid the need to submit the agreements.
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner will review the redactions to Patent
`Owner’s Preliminary Response (Paper 12) and un-redact any portions that
`reflect information that has been made available to the public;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that as to any remaining redactions to the
`Preliminary Response, Petitioner is authorized to file a renewed motion to
`seal;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to seal must be supported by a
`
`declaration by an officer of Petitioner, attesting to the necessity for each
`redaction, the non-public nature of the redacted material, and to the specific
`nature of the alleged harm to Petitioner that would result from its disclosure;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall meet and confer to discuss
`whether any facts material to the allegation that Petitioner has failed to name
`2
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00118
`Patent 8,155,342 B2
`
`
`
`all real parties-in-interest are in dispute, are public, and whether a stipulation
`to those facts can be entered in place of the membership agreements;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties will report to the Board (by
`email) the results of (1) the review by Petitioner of the preliminary response
`and (2) the meet-and-confer, within five business days of the entry date of
`this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`Petitioner:
`Paul C. Haughey
`Scott E. Kolassa
`Jonathan Stroud
`phaughey@kilpatricktownsend.com
`skolassa@kilpatricktownsend.com
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`
`Patent Owner:
`Peter Lambrianakos
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket