throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 13
`Entered: February 29, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00118
`Patent 8,155,342 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, and HUNG H. BUI,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Denying Motion to Seal / Granting Entry of Protective Order
`37 C.F.R. § 42.14, 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00118
`Patent 8,155,342 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`On February 5, 2016, the parties filed a “Joint Motion to Seal and
`Joint Protective Order” (Paper 10) (“Joint Motion”). The items sought to be
`sealed are Exhibits 2007–2011 and Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response
`(Paper 11), all of which were filed electronically on February 5, 2016, in the
`Board’s Patent Review Processing System (“PRPS”) as “Parties and Board
`Only.” Neither party filed redacted public versions of Exhibits 2007–2011
`and of the Preliminary Response (Paper 12) until February 23, 2016. The
`proposed Protective Order is not the Board’s default protective order.
`It is axiomatic that only confidential information should be sealed and
`information not confidential should not be sealed. In pertinent part, the
`Office Trial Practice Guide states:
`Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the
`information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall
`file confidential and non-confidential versions of its submission,
`together with a Motion to Seal the confidential version setting
`forth the reasons why the information redacted from the non-
`confidential version is confidential and should not be made
`publicly available.
`77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,770 (Aug. 14, 2012). The Joint Motion does not
`represent the entirety of each item sought to be sealed constitutes
`confidential information. Rather, it states: “Unified agrees to publicly file
`redacted versions of the aforementioned Exhibits within a reasonable time
`after the submission of Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response. Patent Owner
`agrees to file a redacted version of its Preliminary Response within a
`reasonable time after its submission.” Paper 10, 2.
`
`Thus, the Joint Motion fails to identify specifically what in the items
`sought to be sealed are purported to be confidential information and why. It
`is the redacted information that must be focused on and explained. The Joint
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00118
`Patent 8,155,342 B2
`
`
`
`Motion has not specifically identified or discussed any redacted information.
`The filing of redacted versions of the exhibits and the Preliminary Response
`on February 23, 2016, does not cure the deficiency of the Joint Motion in
`failing to discuss and identify the redacted materials specifically.
`We note that each of redacted Exhibits 2007–2011 filed on February
`23, 2016, contains no content other than a cover sheet identifying the exhibit
`number and the statement “REDACTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.” If the parties
`intended to redact the entirety of each exhibit, we expect a specific
`discussion of each subpart within the exhibit. A general discussion of the
`exhibit as a whole is insufficient. The Joint Motion fails to establish that
`every paragraph, every sentence, and every word in each exhibit constitutes
`confidential information that should be sealed.
`Order
`
`It is
`ORDERED that to the extent the Joint Motion seeks to have sealed
`any information, it is denied;
`FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent the Joint Motion seeks to
`have entered the protective order attached to the Joint Motion as Exhibit A,
`it is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that a clean copy of the executed Protective
`Order shall be filed by either Petitioner or Patent Owner as a numbered
`exhibit in PRPS.1
`
`
`
`
`1 Petitioner and Patent Owner shall decide among themselves which party
`will make the filing.
`
`3
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`IPR2016-00118
`Patent 8,155,342 B2
`
`Petitioner:
`Paul Haughey
`Scott Kolassa
`Jonathan Stroud
`phaughey@kilpatricktownsend.com
`skolassa@kilpatricktownsend.com
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`
`Patent Owner:
`Peter Lambaianakos
`planbrianakos@brownrudnick.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket