`
`By: Heath Briggs, Reg. No. 54,919
`Greenberg Traurig, LLP
`1200 17* Street
`
`Denver, CO 80202
`BriggsH@gtlaw.com
`(303) 572-6500
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Kia Motors America, Inc.
`
`Petitioner,
`V.
`
`Signal IP, Inc.
`Patent Owner.
`
`Inter Partes Review No. 2016-00115
`
`Patent No. 6,012,007
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD PABIS
`
`IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 223 13-1450
`
`1
`
`KMA-1007
`
`1
`
`KMA-1007
`
`
`
`Kia Exhibit 1007
`
`IPR2016-00115
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD PABIS
`
`1.
`
`I, Ronald Pabis, am more than twenty-one years of age, am competent
`
`to present this affidavit, and have personal knowledge of the facts below.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`This affidavit supports Kia’s motion for pro hac vice admission.
`
`I am a shareholder at the law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
`
`I have been a litigating attorney for more than twenty-one years.
`
`I
`
`have been litigating patent cases for more than fourteen years.
`
`5.
`
`I am a member in good standing in the bars of Florida, the District of
`
`Columbia, numerous U.S. District Courts, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`No court or administrative body has ever denied my application for
`
`admission to practice before it.
`
`7.
`
`No court or administrative body has ever imposed sanctions or
`
`contempt citations on me.
`
`8.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`9.
`
`I
`
`agree to be
`
`subject
`
`to the USPTO Code of Professional
`
`Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § l1.l9(a).
`
`2
`
`
`
`Kia Exhibit 1007
`
`IPR20l6-00115
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD PABIS
`
`10.
`
`I am currently seeking pro hac vice admission in the Petitioner’s inter
`
`partes challenges to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,915,210 and 5,659,891. These proceedings
`
`have been designated IPR2015-01724,
`
`IPR2015-01725,
`
`IPR2015-01726, and
`
`IPR2015-01727.
`
`I have been granted pro hac vice admission to represent
`
`petitioner Amkor Technology, Inc. in an unrelated matter for case IPR2013-00242
`
`(paper 62). Otherwise, I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any other
`
`proceedings before the Office in the last three (3) years.
`
`11.
`
`I am petitioner’s co—lead trial counsel in the district court litigation
`
`(Signal IP, Inc. v. Kia Motors America, Inc., Case No. 2:14-cv-02457 (C.D. Cal.)),
`
`which involves the same patent at
`
`issue in this proceeding. As counsel for
`
`petitioner in that matter, I have been actively involved in all aspects of petitioner’s
`
`litigation, including petitioner’s factual investigation and development of its non-
`
`infringement and invalidity positions regarding the claims of the ’007 patent being
`
`challenged in this proceeding.
`
`12.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Kia Exhibit 1007
`
`IPR2016-00115
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD PABIS
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`I
`
`9 __
`Rfihald Pabis, Esq.
`
`Date:
`
`"
`
`.3 /6
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
