throbber
United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`4,537,883
`
`Alexander et al.
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Aug. 27, 1935
`
`trial Pharmacy” pp. 521-524 2d Ed., Lea And Febiger
`Publishers (1976) (Lachman et al.).
`“Remington’s Pharmaceutical Sciences” pp. 1483-1485
`Mack Publishing Co. (1975) (Remington).
`Brooke, et al., American Journal Of Hospital Phar-
`macy, 32:44-45 (1975).
`
`Primary Examiner-—Albert T. Meyers
`Assistant Examiner—Joyce L. Morrison
`Attorney, Agent, or Fz'rm—Richard P. Ryan; Robert H.
`Uloth
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A lyophilized pharmaceutical solid composition con-
`taining cyclophosphamide for reconstitution with water
`to provide a solution for oral or parenteral administra-
`tion. This lyophilized cyclophosphamide solid composi-
`tion demonstrates improved stability, solubility charac-
`teristics and enhanced appearance compared with cur-
`rently available dry powder pre-mix compositions of
`cyclophosphamide. The lyophilized solid composition
`contains about 20 parts by weight of cyclophospha-
`mide, about Ii-2 parts by weight of water and from
`about 10-85 parts by weight of excipient which is com-
`prised mainly of mannitol. Processes for making the
`composition are disclosed.
`
`[54] LYOPHILIZED CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Robert L. Alexander; Robert J.
`Bequette; Terry T. Kensler; Joseph A.
`Scott, all of Evansville, Ind.
`
`[73] Assignee: Mead Johnson & Company,
`Evansville, Ind.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 589,202
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Mar. 13, 1984
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`[63]
`
`Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 440,906, Nov. 12,
`1982, abandoned.
`
`Int. c1.3 ............................................ .. A61K 31/66
`[51]
`[52] U.S. c1. . . ..
`. .. .. 514/110; 514/960
`[58] Field of Search .......................... .. 424/209, ; 34/5
`
`
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,018,302
`3,732,340
`
`1/1962 Arnold et al. ....................... 260/936
`5/1973 Arnold et al. ....................... 260/936
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Lachman et al., “The Theory And Practice Of Indus-
`
`16 Claims, No Drawings
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1006-OOO1
`
`

`
`1
`
`LYOPHILIZED CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
`
`CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATION
`
`This is a continuation-in-part application of Ser. No.
`06/440,906 filed Nov. 12, 1982 now abandoned.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Cyclophosphamide is the generic name for 2-[bis(2-
`chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-2H-1,3,2-oxazaphospho-
`rine-2-oxide monohydrate, a widely used antineoplastic
`drug chemically related to the nitrogen mustards. Cy-
`clophosphamide was one example of a group of novel
`cyclic phosphoric acid ester amides which were dis-
`closed and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,018,302 granted
`Jan. 23, 1962 to H. Arnold, et al.
`A related series of compounds bearing substituents on
`the oxazaphosphorine ring nitrogen was disclosed and
`claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,732,340 granted May 8, 1973
`also to H. Arnold, et a1.
`Over the past 20 years a considerable amount of liter-
`ature concerning cyclophosphamide has accumulated.
`Most of these references deal mainly with clinical appli-
`cations of this agent as an antineoplastic drug. Cyclo-
`phospharnide has been distributed for much of that time
`by Mead Johnson & Company under the proprietary
`name CYTOXAN ®. ENDOXAN ® and NEO-
`SAR ® are proprietary names for similar pharmaceuti-
`cal formulations of cyclophosphamide which are essen-
`tially comparable to CYTOXAN
`While cyclophosphamide comprises the monohy-
`drate drug form, which is the easiest to isolate and with
`which to work, the anhydrous form also exists. No
`other hydrate form has been reported. As used herein,
`the term “cyclophosphamide” refers generically to the
`drug substance (i.e., either the monohydrate or the
`anhydrous form) the term “cyclophosphamide mono-
`hydrate” refers specifically to the monohydrate and the
`term “anhydrous cyclophosphamide” refers to the an-
`hydrous form. The monohydrate form is preferred for
`pharmaceutical processing, as the anhydrous form
`readily picks up water to form the monohydrate when
`exposed to a relative humidity of about 20-30% or
`higher at about 25° C. While the monohydrate is stable,
`nonetheless, under dry conditions (relative humidities
`of about 20% or less) the monohydrate begins to lose
`this water of hydration which can cause problems in
`manufacture. Because of stability limitations which may
`be due in part to ready interconversion between the
`anhydrous and monohydrate forms, it is recommended
`that storage temperatures for cyclophosphamide prod-
`ucts not exceed 30° C. (86° F.), and preferably be stored
`at about 25° C. (77° F.).
`Currently, the parenteral dosage formulations of cy-
`clophosphamide consist of sterile packaged dry powder
`blend admixtures of cyclophosphamide monohydrate
`and sodium chloride. These premixes are dissolved in
`water prior to administration which can be oral as well
`as parenteral. It is intended that the solution itself be
`administered promptly after being prepared but it is
`satisfactory for use up to several hours after prepara-
`tion. During processing and/or storage of the present
`dry powder premix formulation, a glassiness and/or
`stickiness can be acquired by the premix composition
`giving an unattractive material with inferior solubility
`characteristics and decreased potency. This deteriora-
`tion is more pronounced as storage time is extended or
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4,537,883
`
`2
`if the upper limit of the storage temperature range is
`exceeded.
`
`A common practice used with constitution of sterile
`solids by a suitable aqueous vehicle consists of warming
`the container to expedite the dissolution process, espe-
`cially when the solids dissolve slowly. A study examin-
`ing the effect of briefly heating cyclophosphamide solu-
`tions was reported by D. Brooke, et al. in American
`Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 32:44-45 (1975). This
`study concluded that warming vials of cyclophospha-
`mide in order to facilitate dissolution after adding an
`aqueous vehicle could decrease the potency of the final
`injectable product. In summary, these stability limita-
`tions and dissolution difficulties can often result in clini-
`cal usage of subpotent cyclophosphamide solutions.
`Therefore, the main objective of the project culmi-
`nating in the instant invention was to provide a cyclo-
`phosphamide dosage form with improved solubility
`characteristics and enhanced appearance, while main-
`taining stability comparable to the dry pre-mix compo-
`sition. Unexpectedly, the unique lyophilized solid com-
`position discovered has improved stability over the previ-
`ous dry pre-mix composition.
`Problems with unstable drug solutions have been
`handled previously by practitioners in the pharmaceuti-
`cal arts by applying lyophilization, cf: L. Lachman, et
`al., “The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy”,
`2nd Ed., Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA., pp. 521-524
`(1976); “Remington’s Pharmaceutical Sciences”, 15th
`Ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, PA., pp. 1483-1485
`(1975). The technique known as lyophilization is often
`employed for injectable pharmaceuticals which exhibit
`poor stability in aqueous solution. This process involves
`freeze drying, whereby ice is sublimed from frozen
`solutions leaving only the solid, dried components of
`the original liquid.
`The particular advantages of lyophilization are that
`biologicals and pharmaceuticals which are unstable in
`aqueous solution yet relatively stable in the solid state
`can be processed and filled into dosage containers in
`solution, taking advantage of the relative ease of pro-
`cessing a liquid; dried without elevated temperatures,
`thereby eliminating adverse thermal effects; and then
`stored in the dry state in which there are relatively few
`stability problems. Additionally, freeze dried products
`are often more soluble and/or more rapidly solubilized,
`dispersions are stabilized, and products subject to deg-
`radation by oxidation or hydrolysis are protected.
`Pharmaceuticals to be freeze dried are usually in
`aqueous solution ranging from 0.01 to 40% in concen-
`tration of total solids. Final moisture content of the
`dried product is generally below 1.0% although some
`products, mainly biologicals, may have a final moisture
`content which could range as high as about 10%. Usu-
`ally, the improvement in stability of the lyophilizate,
`compared to the solution, is due to the absence of water
`in the pharmaceutical composition.
`The active constituent of many pharmaceutical prod-
`ucts, though, is present in such small quantity that if
`freeze-dried "alone, it may not give a composition of
`suitable bulk and, in some cases, its presence would be
`hard to detect visually. Therefore, excipients are often
`added to increase the amount of solids present. In most
`applications it is desirable for the dried product cake to
`occupy essentially the same volume as that of the origi-
`nal solution. To achieve this, the total solids content of
`the original solution is usually about 10 to 25%. Among
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1006-0002
`
`

`
`4,537,883
`
`3
`substances found useful for this purpose, often in combi-
`nation, are sodium or potassium phosphates, citric acid,
`tartaric acid, gelatin, lactose and other carbohydrates
`such as dextrose, mannitol and dextran; and on occa-
`sion, preservatives. Various excipients contribute ap-
`pearance characteristics to the cake, such as whether
`dull and spongy or sparkling and crystalline, firm or
`friable, expanded or shrunken, and uniform or striated.
`Therefore, formulation of a composition to be freeze
`dried must include consideration not only of the nature
`and stability characteristics required during the liquid
`state, both freshly prepared and when reconstituted
`before use, but the characteristics desired in the final
`lyophilized cake. Additionally, for products to be re-
`constituted for parenteral usage, consideration must
`also be given to the pharmacological effects of excipi-
`ents chosen. In some instances,
`there may even be
`chemical interaction between the active ingredient and
`one or more of the excipients during processing. This
`could, of course, result in reduced potency of the fin-
`ished product.
`For all the above reasons, it becomes apparent that
`selection of a suitable excipient or excipients for a phar-
`maceutical product containing a reactive,
`thermally
`labile, and inherently unstable ingredient such as cyclo-
`phosphamide is not an obvious process. Considerable
`testing, including drug assay, would be required, as in
`the instant case, for the development of such a composi-
`tion. We surprisingly found that only the use of manni-
`tol as the primary excipient gave a far superior lyophili-
`zate compared to lyophilizates obtained using other
`excipients. Unexpectedly, we also discovered that a
`lyophilized cyclophosphamide solid composition con-
`taining about 4-% moisture gave a product with superior
`thermal stability, compared to currently available dry
`powder premixes, lyophilized cyclophosphamide solid
`compositions with moisture levels of about 1% or less,
`or even cyclophosphamide itself.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention concerns an improved solid pharma-
`ceutical composition and is based in part upon the dis-
`covery that a lyophilized cyclophosphamide-mannitol
`solid composition has improved thermal stability when
`it contains an amount of water approximately equimolar
`to the cyclophosphamide content taken as the anhy-
`dride. Of equal importance is the discovery that the
`desirable physical properties of the solid composition
`appear to be achieved only by using mannitol as the major
`excipient. Two processes have been developed which
`allow facile production of the solid composition in vials
`for packaging as unit dosage forms for reconstitution as
`sterile solutions.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`The therapeutically-active component of this inven-
`tion, cyclophosphamide,
`is a well known and widely
`used anticancer agent. Cyclophosphamide chemically is
`2-[bis-(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-2H-l,3,2-oxaza-
`phosphorine-2-oxide monohydrate, shown in Formula I
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`Cl
`
`I
`
`4
`
`21.1
`
`.l-I20
`
`It is appreciated by the practitioner that the degree of
`reactivity desired for efficacy in an agent of this sort
`necessarily acts as a limit to its inherent stability in
`aqueous solution. Mainly for this reason, cyclophospha-
`mide is compounded as a sterile dry powder mixture of
`cyclophosphamide monohydrate and NaCl for constitu-
`tion with sterile water just prior to administration.
`Some instability of cyclophosphamide dry powder
`mixes can be evidenced by change in physical proper-
`ties, e.g. decreased rate of dissolution, change in appear-
`ance, and the like, as well as loss of potency on storage.
`This deterioration becomes more pronounced on ex-
`tended storage or on exposure of the powder mix to
`temperatures above about 90° F., a temperature not
`uncommon during commercial transportation or ware-
`house storage. Freshly prepared solutions made up from
`this powder mix can exhibit lowered potency due not
`only to prior degradation of the active ingredient but
`also through incomplete dissolution of the powder mix
`as well.
`The instant invention has resulted from work under-
`
`taken to ascertain if physical properties, especially dis-
`solution rate, could be improved in a lyophilized com-
`position containing anhydrous cyclophosphamide.
`Cyclophosphamide was thoroughly tested with those
`excipients compatible with parenteral administration to
`determine if a suitable lyophilizate cake could be
`formed by freeze-drying. Following the lyophilization
`process, the resulting cake was evaluated visually on its
`physical appearance using as desired criteria: original
`shape, no shrinkage or meltback, good coloration, ho-
`mogeneity, firmness, and crystallinity. The dissolution
`rate was then tested and a global score of poor, fair, or
`good, based on the above criteria, was assigned, cf:
`Table 1.
`
`TABLE 1
`
`Excipient
`Lactose
`
`Dextrose
`Tartaric acid
`Urea
`L-arginine
`Polyvinylpyrro-
`lidone (PVP)
`KHZPO4
`K2]-IP04
`Na2CO3
`NaHCO3
`Nal-ICO3
`Mannitol
`
`Excipient Testing For Cake Formation
`Pre-lyophilization Solution:
`Lyophilization
`Concentration (% W/V)
`Result
`1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.3, 3.5,
`Poor cakes
`5.0, 6.7, 8.0
`2.0, 2.5
`2.0
`1.0, 2.0, 2.5
`0.5
`3.0
`
`Poor cakes
`Poor cake
`Poor cakes
`Poor cake
`Poor cake
`
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0, 1.25, 1.5
`1.75, 2.0, 2.5
`1.7, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0,
`5.0, 6.0, 7.0
`10.0, 15.0
`2.5, 3.0, 5.0
`
`Poor cake
`Poor cake
`Poor cake
`Poor to fair cakes
`Good cakes
`Good cakes
`
`Poor cakes
`Poor cakes
`
`Mannitol
`Cl-l3CO2K
`
`65
`
`Each solution for lyophilization contained 3.57%
`(W/V) cyclophosphamide monohydrate and an excipi-
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1006-0003
`
`

`
`4,537,883
`
`6
`
`TABLE 2-continued
`
`5
`ent or excipients. The solutions were prepared using
`Water for Injection and were filtered through a prefilter
`and a 0.22 pm filter membrane. The solutions were
`filled into 30 mL serum vials with a fill volume of 15 mL .
`of solution per vial (the equivalent of 500 mg of anhy-
`drous cyclophosphamide).
`Prior to lyophilization, the filled vials were prechilled
`to 5° C. in a refrigerator. The vials were then frozen in
`the lyophilization chamber for approximately 2 hrs to a
`temperature of about -—35° C. After cooling the con-
`denser to about -60“ C., the lyophilizer chamber was
`evacuated to approximately 50 millitorr. An initial shelf
`temperature of 0° C. was maintained for the first 14-16
`hrs of the lyophilization cycle. The shelf temperature
`was then raised to 25° C. The cycle was completed
`when the product temperature stabilized near the shelf
`temperature, usually requiring 2-6 more hours, and the
`vacuum pressure reached equilibrium at a reading of
`approximately 100 millitorr. During lyophilization,
`product temperature was monitored using themocouple
`probes placed inside several vials.
`After the lyophilization process was completed, the
`material remaining in the vial was observed for color,
`appearance, texture, friability, and shrinkage from the
`original frozen volume. Also, each formulatin was
`tested for its moisture loss on drying (4 hrs at 70° C.
`under vacuum) and its dissolution characteristics upon
`reconstitution with 25 mL of Sterile Water for Injec-
`tion.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Unexpectedly, only two excipients from this group
`(Table 1) exhibited favorable cake-forming ability in the
`presence of cyclophosphamide. These two prototype
`formulations (containing NaHCO3 or mannitol)
`re-
`tained their original shape, possessed suitable texture
`and appearance, and dissolved easily upon reconstitu-
`tion with water. Most of the other excipient formula-
`tions were unsuitable due to poor quality cakes due
`mainly to shrinkage and/or poor dissolution. As can be
`seen from Table 1, only mannitol, at concentrations of
`7% W/V or below, and sodium bicarbonate were ini- 40
`tially found to be acceptable excipients in the cyclo-
`phosphamide lyophilization process. The formulations
`containing these two excipients dissolved easily within
`a few seconds upon reconstitution with water.
`Further experimentation utilizing the same experi-
`mental procedure to investigate lyophilization results
`using mixed excipients demonstrated the surprising
`finding that fair to good lyophilizate cakes could be
`obtained only with mannitol compared to lactose or
`sodium bicarbonate as a primary excipient; cf: Table 2. 5°
`
`35
`
`45
`
`Combined Excipient Testing
`
`Na citrate (0.5)
`
`Mannitol (2.0)
`
`Na ascorbate (0.33)
`
`Na acetate (0.33)
`
`Na citrate (0.33)
`
`Na2CO3 (0.5)
`Na}-[CO3 (0.5)
`PVP (1.0)
`
`Primary Excipient
`(Concentration
`Secondary Excipient
`Lyophilization
`
`% W/V)
`(Concentration % W/V)
`Result
`Nal-[CO3 (2.0)
`Glycine (0.5)
`Poor cake,
`very fragile
`poor cake,
`very fragile
`Poor cake,
`shrinkage
`Poor cake,
`slow dissolution
`Poor cake,
`shrinkage
`No cake
`No cake
`Fair cake,
`sl. shrinkage
`Poor cakes,
`shrinkage
`Poor cake,
`slow dissolution
`Poor cakes,
`unhomogenous
`Fair to good
`cakes
`Fair cake,
`sl. shrinkage
`Na citrate (0.33) Good cake
`
`Mannitol (2.5)
`
`Na citrate (0.33, 0.5, 0.67)
`
`L-arginine (0.5)
`
`Glycine (0.5, 1.0)
`
`PVP (0.5, 1.0)
`
`Mannitol (3.0)
`
`Glycine (0.5)
`
`
`
`Most of the compositions listed in Table 2 exhibited
`some ability to form lyophilizate cakes except those in
`which lactose was the primary excipient; however,
`most of the resulting cakes were of poor quality due to
`friability, shrinkage and/or poor dissolution. The lyo-
`philizates containing various secondary excipients with
`sodium bicarbonate were of poorer quality than the
`lyophilizates with sodium bicarbonate as the only excip-
`ient. One formulation containing mannitol as the pri-
`mary excipient and sodium citrate and a second formu-
`lation containing mannitol as the primary excipient and
`polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) formed acceptable lyo-
`philizates thate were firm, homogenous cakes with min-
`imum friability and shrinkage. These two combination
`excipient products dissolved easily in a few seconds
`upon reconstitution with water. These selected lyophi-
`lized solid compositions all had low moisture levels, as
`measured by loss on drying, on the order of about 2%
`or less. While considerable improvement of the dissolu-
`tion properties and physical appearance was achieved
`with these low moisture cyclophosphamide lyophili-
`zates, six-week stability testing indicated that these ly-
`ophilized solid compositions were heat sensitive and, in
`fact, much less stable than the existing sodium chloride/-
`cyclophosphamide monohydrate dry powder premix-
`ture.
`
`
`
`TABLE 2
`
`Combined Excipient Testing
`
`Nal-lCO3 (1.5)
`
`Primary Excipient
`(Concentration
`Secondary Excipient
`Lyophilimtion
`
`% W/V)
`(Concentration % W/V)
`Result
`Lactose (2.0)
`Mannitol (1.0, 1.5)
`No cakes
`Lactose (3.3)
`Citric acid, anhyd. (1.0)
`No cake
`Na2CO3 (1.0)
`No cake
`Na}-ICO3 (1.25)
`No cake
`NaCl (0.25)
`Poor cake,
`shrinkage
`Poor cakes,
`shrinkage
`Poor cake,
`shrinkage
`Poor cake,
`shrinkage
`Poor cakes,
`very fragile
`
`Glycine (0.25; 0.5)
`
`K2HPO4 (0.5)
`
`Citric acid, anhyd. (0.5)
`
`Lactose (0.5, 1.0, 1.5)
`
`55
`
`60
`
`55
`
`It was unexpectedly discovered, however, that hu-
`midification of these low moisture lyophilized cyclo-
`phosphamide solid compositions (“dry” lyophilizates)
`could be easily and reproducibly effected by subjecting
`them to an air atmosphere of about 60 to 80% relative
`humidity at about 25° C. in a closed container for 1-2
`days. Under these conditions, a state of equilibrium
`could be achieved in which the moisture gained on a
`molar basis was approximately equivalent to the anhy-
`drous cyclophosphamide content of the lyophilizate.
`The improved dissolution characteristics found in the
`“dry” cyclophosphamide lyophilizates remained essen-
`tially unchanged upon humidification. Stability testing
`of the humidified solid compositions (“hydrated” lyo-
`philizates) demonstrated that those compositions con-
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1006-OOO4
`
`

`
`7
`taining mainly mannitol as the excipient were unexpect-
`edly superior, compared with the sodium bicarbonate
`excipient compositions in maintaining minimal dissolu-
`tion times, cf: Table 3.
`TABLE 3
`Comparative Stability Testing of “I-lydrated" Solid
`Lyophilizates: Mannitol as excipient vs Nal-[CO3 as excipient
`Storage
`Time
`Dissolution Times (sec)
`Temperature
`(Wks)
`Mannitol
`Nal-[CO3
`40°
`3
`~ 20
`> 180
`6
`~ 60
`> 180
`12
`- 60
`~ 120
`3
`~20
`> 180
`6
`~ 60
`> 180
`12
`~ 60
`~ 120
`6
`~ 60
`> 180
`12
`~ 60
`> 180
`
`35°
`
`25'’
`
`Preferred solid compositions of the instant invention
`are comprised of about 20 parts by weight of cyclophos-
`phamide, taken as the anhydrous form, about 15-2 parts
`by weight of water and from about 10-40 parts by
`weight of excipient which is primarily mannitol. Most
`preferred compositions are comprised of about 20 parts
`by weight of cyclophosphamide,
`taken as the anhy-
`dride, about 1% parts by weight of water and about 15
`parts by weight of excipient consisting essentially of
`mannitol.
`These solid compositions may be prepared by either
`of two methods. The first method, of’ which one em-
`bodiment as mentioned hereinabove, involves lyophili-
`zation and humidification. Common to both methods is
`preparation of a sterile solution for lyophilization. A
`typical solution is composed of about 1 part by weight
`1 excipient which is mainly mannitol, about 1.5 parts by
`weight cyclophosphamide (as the monohydrate), and
`about 40 parts water. In order to obtain optimal results
`with the lyophilizate composition this solution should
`not contain much more than about 4% cyclophospha-
`" mide content. Continuing with the first method,
`this
`solution is aseptically filled into suitable containers and
`then lyophilized to a “dry” lyophilizate cake which has
`a moisture content on the order of about 2% or less.
`This lyophilization is done in a short period of time
`(~24 hrs) at a lyophilization chamber pressure of about
`100 to 500 millitorr using a very cold condenser temper-
`ature (about —-60° C.) and a warm shelf temperature
`(about 20°—25° C.). This typical “dry” lyophilizate is
`then humidified to give a “hydrated” lyophilizate con-
`taining approximately 4% moisture. With humidif1ca-
`tion at atmospheric pressure, further water pick-up
`essentially stops at this point giving the stable “hy-
`drated” lyophilizate solid composition of the instant
`invention. The amount of water taken up is approxi-
`mately equimolar ranging to about 30% excess com-
`pared with the cyclophosphamide (on an anhydrous
`basis) present in the cake. While the humidification can
`be done at approximately atmospheric pressure,
`the
`time required for complete humidification is considera-
`bly shortened (to at least a third or less) when done
`under reduced pressure. By reduced pressure is meant a
`pressure of about 0.1 to 25 torr. A unit of 1 torr is equiv-
`alent to 1/760 standard atmospheric pressure.
`A second method of obtaining the desired lyophilized
`solid composition involves lyophilizing the sterile solu-
`tion directly using a longer lyophilization cycle (~48
`hrs). This method, done more slowly under milder con-
`ditions, requires adjustment of certain parameters of the
`lyophilization process such as shelf temperature, and
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4,537,883
`
`8
`condenser temperature during the process of drying.
`This second lyophilization process comprises 2 stages of
`freeze-drying done under a 500 millitorr chamber pres-
`sure. The first stage of freeze-drying is done with a low
`condenser temperature of about -60“ C., and a shelf
`temperature at about 10° C. The second stage of freeze-
`drying requires raising the condenser temperature to
`about —30° C. and lowering the shelf temperature to
`about — 10° C.
`
`These lyophilized cyclophosphamide solid composi-
`tions may be provided in single dose container forms by
`aseptically filling suitable containers with the sterile
`pre-lyophilization solution to a prescribed cyclophos-
`phamide content; preparing the desired lyophilized
`solid composition, using either of the two methods de-
`scribed hereinabove; and then hermetically sealing the
`single dose container. It is intended that these filled
`containers will allow rapid dissolution of the solid com-
`position upon reconstitution with water in situ giving an
`appropriate sterile solution of desired cyclophospha-
`mide concentration for administration. By suitable con-
`tainers is meant a container capable of maintaining a
`sterile environment such as a vial capable of being her-
`metically sealed by a stopper means. Additionally, suit-
`able containers implies appropriateness of size, consid-
`ering the volume of solution to be held upon reconstitu-
`tion of the lyophilized composition; and appropriate-
`ness of container material, generally Type I glass. The
`stopper means employed, e. g. sterile rubber closures or
`an equivalent, should be understood to be that which
`provides the aforementioned seal but which also allows
`entry for the purpose of introduction of diluent, e.g.
`sterile water, the reconstitution of the desired cyclo-
`phosphamide solution. These and other aspects of the
`suitability of containers for pharmaceutical products
`such as those of the instant invention are well known to
`those skilled in the practice of pharmaceutical arts.
`While the physical properties, such as appearance
`and particularly dissolution time, were improved in the
`instant solid compositions, thereby achieving one objec-
`tive of the invention, we unexpectedly found that these
`instant solid compositions also possessed improved ther-
`mal stability compared with currently known dry pow-
`der premix formulations as well as cyclophosphamide
`itself.
`In practice, expectation for enhancement of
`chemical stability by lyophilization relates to a compari-
`son of the lyophilizate solid with the solution form of
`the pharmaceutical composition. In contrast, the instant
`compositions demonstrate enhanced chemical stability
`between solid dosage forms, cf: Table 4.
`TABLE 4
`
`Comparative Chemical Stabilities for “Hydrated"
`Cyclophosphamide/Mannitol Lyophilizate and
`CYTOXAN Q for Injection {Powder Premixg
`Storage
`Time
`Potency 1% of Zero-time)
`Temperature
`(Wks)
`Lyophilizate
`CYTOXAN ®
`50°
`1
`31
`31
`45°
`1
`94
`80
`2
`76
`42
`1
`100
`98
`3
`101
`85
`6
`99
`33
`I2
`98
`2
`3
`101
`105
`6
`100
`98
`12
`100
`98
`26
`98
`85
`6
`100
`101
`12
`100
`101
`
`35°
`
`25°
`
`40°
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1006-OOO5
`
`

`
`4,537,883
`
`9
`
`TABLE 4-continued
`Comparative Chemical Stabilities for “Hydrated”
`Cyclophosphamide/Mannitol Lyophilizate and
`CYTOXAN Q for Injection (Powder Premixg
`Storage
`Time
`Potency 5% of Zero-time}
`Temperature
`(Wks)
`Lyophilizate
`CYTOXAN ®
`26
`100
`103
`
`
`
`5
`
`10
`
`I5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`10
`final volume of this solution to 15 liters. The solution is
`first passed through a sterile prefilter and then a sterile
`0.22 pm pore size membrane filter, following which the
`sterile solution is then aseptically filled into sterile 30
`mL glass vials. Each vial is filled with 15.0 mL solution
`(containing the equivalent of 500 mg anhydrous cyclo-
`phosphamide) and then sterile rubber closures are asep-
`tically inserted in the lyophilization position. These
`filled vials are placed in suitable lyophilization equip-
`ment and cooled as quickly as possible to a temperature
`of about -35” C.
`The lyophilizer condenser is then cooled to about
`-60” C. and the lyophilization chamber is evacuated to
`a pressure of approximately 500 millitorr. Shelf heat is
`set at +20° C. to begin the drying process. Following
`about 15-20 hours of primary drying, the shelf tempera-
`ture is raised in order to bring the product temperatures
`to near +25° C. provided that the product temperature
`thermocouples have reached + 15° to + 18° C. and the
`lyophilization chamber pressure is not more than 500
`millitorr at that point. Lyophilizatin is then continued
`until a final product temperature of +22° to +24° C.
`with a chamber pressure of not more than about 200
`millitorr, is reached. Depending on the capacity of the
`lyophilization equipment and the product batch size, the
`total lyophilization time will vary but is generally in the
`range of 24-36 hours. Following completion of the
`lyophilization process, the high vacuum is relieved by
`the aseptic introduction of sterile air and/or nitrogen
`having 80% relative humidity at room temperature. An
`aseptic environment is maintained during this rehydra-
`tion process which is complete within approximately
`18-24 hours at atmospheric pressure. At this point, the
`vials are closed by aseptically seating the lyophilization
`stoppers into the vials by mechanical collapse of the
`shelves.
`
`A preferred method of humidification involves intro-
`ducing water vapor into the lyophilization chamber
`while it remains under reduced pressure. With the
`chamber at about 25° C. and with a closed vacuum
`(pump off) of about 100-200 millitorr, a quantity of
`sterile water is vaporized into the chamber during
`which time the pressure may increase to about 25 torr.
`The quantity of sterile water used depends on the size of
`the lyophilization equipment being used as well as the
`product batch size. Typically, for 180 vials of the size
`and content described hereinabove and with a lyophili-
`zation chamber volume of approximately 125 liters, the
`amount of water used is on the order of 9 mL. The
`introduction of water is accomplished by establishing a
`closed system and bleeding in the water vapor issuing
`from a reservoir of liquid water kept at about 60°—80° by
`external heating. Boiling chips are used to prevent
`bumping and the introduction of water is completed
`within approximately 45 minutes. The internal chamber
`pressure during this “vacuum humidification” process
`varies from about 0.1 to 25 torr with the introduction of
`
`the water vapor. Total time of humidification using this
`method generally requires about 2-6 hours, again de-
`pending on lyophilization equipment size and product
`batch size. After humidification, the remaining vacuum
`is relieved by introduction of sterile air and/or nitrogen
`and the vials are closed by aseptically seating the lyoph-
`ilization stoppers into the vials by mechanical collapse
`of the shelves.
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1006-0006
`
`It is recognized by practitioners in the pharmaceuti-
`cal arts that the use of elevated storage temperatures for
`shorter time periods is standard practice in obtaining
`comparative stability data. As can be seen in Table 4,
`the “hydrated” cyclophosphamide/mannitol
`lyophi-
`lized solid composition possesses greater thermal stabil-
`ity than the current CYTOXAN® for Injection dry
`powder formulation.
`Short term comparative stability studies have also
`been made using the “hydrated” cyclophosphamide/-
`mannitol lyophilized solid composition, a cyclophos-
`phamide monohydrate/mannitol dry powder blend (not
`lyophilized), CYTOXAN ® for Injection dry powder
`premix, and pure cyclophosphamide monohydrate.
`These studies at a storage temperature of 40° C. gave
`the results summarized in Table 5.
`
`TABLE 5
`Comparative Stabilities at 40° C. for:
`“Hydrated” Cyclophosphamide/Mannitol Lyophilizate
`Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate/Mannitol Powder Blend
`CYTOXAN ® for Injection (Powder Premix)
`. Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate
`Potency
`Physical Appearance
`g% of Zero-time!
`B
`C
`D
`A
`B C D A
`s1.
`s1.
`un-
`104
`96
`93
`95 un-
`changed melted melted
`changed
`un-
`melted melted melted
`changed
`un-
`melted melted
`4 —
`42
`101
`12
`
`changed
`
`102
`
`57
`
`39
`
`37
`
`UOP’?
`
`Time
`(Wks)
`3
`
` 6
`
`As these tabular results show, the “hydrated” cyclo-
`phosphamide/marmitol
`lyophilized solid composition
`demonstrates superior thermal stability as well as main-
`tenance of initial physical appearance. In summary, the
`“hydrated” cyclophosphamide/mannitol
`lyophilized
`solid composition shows unexpected improved stability,
`superior solubility characteristics and enhanced appear-
`ance when compared with other powder premix formu-
`lations of cyclophosphamide monohydrate and cyclo-
`phosphamide monohydrate alone. These improved
`characteristics are indicative of a superior pharmaceuti-
`cal solid composition.
`The following examples describe in detail methods
`for prep

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket