throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 8
`Entered: April 14, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CEPHALON, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00098 (Patent 8,791,270 B2)
`Case IPR2016-00111 (Patent 8,895,756 B2)1
`____________
`
`Before JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, ZHENYU YANG, and
`TINA E. HULSE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Patent Owner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Aaron Stiefel
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are common to each referenced case.
`We, therefore, issue a single order that has been entered in each case. For
`convenience, paper numbers refer to those filed in IPR2016-00098. The
`parties may use this style caption when filing a single paper in multiple
`proceedings, provided that such caption includes a footnote attesting that
`“the word-for-word identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in
`the caption.”
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00098 (Patent 8,791,270 B2)
`IPR2016-00111 (Patent 8,895,756 B2)
`
`
`Patent Owner filed Motions for pro hac vice admission of Aaron
`
`Stiefel. Paper 6. Petitioner did not file an opposition.
`
`According to Patent Owner, the Motions are supported by the
`
`Declaration of Aaron Stiefel, filed as Exhibit 2001. See Paper 6, 1–4 (citing
`
`Ex. 2001). Exhibit 2001, however, is TREANDA® Prescribing
`
`Information. Nevertheless, the Declaration of Aaron Stiefel is attached to
`
`each Motion. For future filings in this proceeding, the parties are required to
`
`submit each supporting document as a separate exhibit, and not as an
`
`attachment to any paper. 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(a).
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`
`admit Aaron Stiefel pro hac vice in each proceeding.
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission
`
`of Aaron Stiefel are granted in these proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Aaron Stiefel shall comply with the
`
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of the C.F.R.; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Aaron Stiefel shall be subject to the
`
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the Office’s
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101-11.901.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00098 (Patent 8,791,270 B2)
`IPR2016-00111 (Patent 8,895,756 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Lawrence Sung
`lsung@wileyrein.com
`
`Neal Seth
`nseth@wileyrein.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Soumitra Deka
`Soumitra.deka@kayescholer.com
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket