throbber
Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`RESEARCH ARTICLE
`
`Pharmaceutical Development of a Parenteral Lyophilized Formulation
`
`of the Novel Antitumor AgentAp|idine
`
`B. Nuijen“, M. Bouma‘, R. E. C. Henrar2, P. Florianos, J. M. Jimeno3, H. Ta|sma4,
`J. J. Kettenes—van den Bosch5, A. J. R .Heck5, A. Bu|t4 and J. H. Beijnen”
`
`‘Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 8 otervaart Hospi tal /The Netherlands Cancer I nsti tute, Amsterdam,
`
`The Netherlands; ZNDDO-Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3Pharma Mar s.a., Tres Cantos, Madrid, Soai n;
`
`4Faculty of Pharmacy, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 5Biomolecular Mass Soectrometry, Utrecht
`
`University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
`
`ABSTRACT: Aplidine is a naturally occurring cyclic depsipeptide isolated from the Mediterranean tunicate
`
`Aplidi um al bi cans. Aplidine displays promising in vitro and in vi V0 antitumor activities against various solid
`
`human tumor xenografts and is therefore developed now for clinical testing. The aim of this study was to
`
`develop a stable parenteral pharmaceutical dosage form for clinical Phase Itesting. Aplidine raw material was
`
`characterized by using several chromatographic and spectrometric techniques. These experiments showed that
`
`aplidine exists as two isomers. A stability-indicating HPLC assay was developed. Solubility testing showed
`
`that aplidine exhibits very poor aqueous solubility. Because solubilized aplidine showed substantial degradation
`
`under heat and light stress testing conditions, it was decided to develop a lyophilized dosage form. Freeze-
`
`drying was carried out with a 500 ug/mL solution of aplidine in 40% (V/V) tert-butanol in Water for Injection
`
`(Wfl) containing 25 mg/mL D-mannitol as a bulking agent. Differential scanning calorimetry was applied to
`
`determine the optimal freeze-drying cycle parameters. The prototype, containing 500 ug aplidine and 25 mg
`
`D-mannitol per vial, was found to be the optimal formulation in terms of solubility, length of lyophilization
`
`cycle, and dosage requirements in the forthcoming Phase I clinical studies. Quality control of the freeze-dried
`
`formulation demonstrates that the manufacturing process does not affect the integrity of aplidine. The optimal
`
`reconstitution solution was found to be l5/l5/70% (V/V/V) Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl (CEW). Both recon-
`
`stituted product and dilutions of the reconstituted product with normal saline (up to 1:100 V/V) appeared to be
`
`stable for at least 24 hours after preparation. Shelf-life data, available thus far, show that the lyophilized formu-
`
`lation is stable for at least 1 year when stored at +2—8°C in the dark.
`
`Introduction
`
`Aplidine (dehydrodidemnin B (DDB), MW ll09,
`
`(l, 2). This naturally occurring cyclic depsipeptide
`
`Fig. l) is a novel representative of an evolving group
`
`is isolated from the Mediterranean tunicate Apl i di um
`
`of anticancer agents derived from marine sources
`
`al bi cans and belongs to the didemnin family, a class
`
`* Author to whom correspondence should be
`
`addressed: Slotervaart Hospital/The Netherlands
`
`Cancer Institute, Department of Pharmacy &
`
`Pharmacology, Louwesweg 6,
`
`l066EC Amsterdam,
`
`The Netherlands, Tel: (31) 20 512 4737, Fax: (31) 20
`
`512 4753/4824, e-mail: apbnu@slz.nl
`
`of marine-derived compounds which exhibit
`
`antiviral, antitumor, and immunosuppressive
`
`activity. All didemnins share a common macrocy-
`
`clic peptide structure and differ only in the side-
`
`chain attached to the backbone by the amino group
`
`of threonine (3). Aplidine exists in two conformers
`
`or rotamers referring to the cis and trans isomers of
`
`the pyruvoyl-proline amide bond (Fig. 2) (4).
`
`Vol.54, No.3, May/June 2000
`
`193
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0001
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`Didemnin B (DB), the most potent representative
`
`ofthe didemnin class up to now, was the first marine-
`
`derived anticancer compound to enter clinical trials
`
`in the early 1980’s. Although interesting results were
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Chemicals and Materials
`
`seen in this phase I/II programme sponsored by the
`
`Aplidine was obtained from natural didemnin A by
`
`National Cancer Institute (NCI), the occurrence of
`
`a three-step synthesis under the responsibility of
`
`dose-limiting neuromuscular and cardiac toxicity
`
`Pharma Mar s.a. (Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain) and
`
`hindered further dose-escalation and repeated cycles
`
`provided through the New Drug Development
`
`oftherapy (2). The dehydro-derivative of DB, dehy-
`
`Office-Oncology (NDDO-Oncology, Amsterdam,
`
`drodidemnin B (DDB) or aplidine, displays even
`
`The Netherlands). All chemicals used were of
`
`more potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity
`
`analytical grade and were used without further
`
`against various solid human tumor xenografts. As
`
`purification. Distilled water was used throughout.
`
`its parent compound, the antitumor effect of aplidine
`
`Excipients, including tert-butanol, and primary
`
`is believed to be primarily mediated through inhibiti-
`
`packaging materials used in the manufacturing of
`
`on of the cell cycle progression in the G1 phase by
`
`aplidine lyophilized product and reconstitution
`
`binding to elongation factor lot in the presence of
`
`solution were of European Pharmacopeia III (Ph.
`
`GTP, thus interfering with protein synthesis (5, 6).
`
`In vitro experiments revealed that aplidine exerts
`
`less neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity at antitumor
`concentrations than didemnin B. On the basis of
`
`these results, aplidine has been identified as a new
`
`generation of the didemnin class, with a possibly
`
`significantly higher therapeutic index (2, 7, 8, 9).
`
`In animal toxicology studies a maximum tolerated
`
`dose (MTD) of 1250 ug/kg body weight in mice
`
`and a MTD of 570 ug/kg body weight in rats were
`
`determined, respectively. Taking the 1/10 MTD
`
`mouse-equivalent, the initial dosage level in Phase
`
`I clinical trials was therefore defined at 350 ug/m2
`
`(10, 11). A suitable parenteral formulation contai-
`
`ning 500 ug aplidine per dosage unit was required
`
`to start early clinical studies. Because of its very
`
`poor aqueous solubility (< 0.1 mg/mL), an adequa-
`
`Eur. III) or United States Pharmacopeia 24 (USP24)
`
`grade and provided by the supplier with a Certificate
`
`ofAnalysis. Substances were approved on the basis
`
`of in-house quality controls carried out according
`
`to monographs in the mentioned pharrnacopeias.
`
`Normal saline (0.9% w/v sodium chloride in Wfl)
`
`was manufactured in-house at the Department of
`
`Pharmacy of the Slotervaart Hospital (Amsterdam,
`
`The Netherlands).
`
`Characterization of Aplidi ne Bulk Drug
`
`An interim reference standard of the aplidine bulk
`
`drug material, i.e., batch of highest purity available,
`
`was defined (Lot APL-297) and structurally
`
`characterized by fast-atom bombardment mass
`
`spectrometry (FAB-MS), nuclear magnetic
`
`resonance (NMR), and infra-red (IR) spectroscopy,
`
`and analytically characterized by high performance
`
`te vehicle had to be found to administer aplidine to
`
`liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultraviolet/
`
`the patient. The work described here was directed
`
`visible (UV/VIS) spectrophotometry. On the basis
`
`towards developing a suitable parenteral formulati-
`
`of these results, specifications were drawn up for
`
`on for toxicological and clinical evaluation
`
`the aplidine raw material.
`
`according to the EORTC/CRC/NCI
`
`Joint
`
`Formulation Working Party (JFWP) guidelines (12,
`
`13, 14). Aplidine bulk drug substance was fully
`
`FAB-MS: The FAB mass spectrum was obtained with
`a Model JMS-SX/SX 102A tandem mass
`
`structurally and analytically characterized. The
`
`spectrometer (BEBE, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The
`
`formulation approach involved the use of a
`
`acceleration voltage was 10 kV. A xenon source with
`
`cosolvent-surfactant system to enhance the
`
`an energy of approximately 6 keV was used, and
`
`solubility, and lyophilization to improve the stability
`
`the matrix was glycerol. Positive ion spectra were
`
`of the compound.
`
`recorded over a mass range of 10-1500 D.
`
`194
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0002
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`NM R-spectroscopy: 1H NMR spectra were recorded
`
`methanol/H20) were recorded with a Model UV/VIS
`
`with a Gemini 300 BB instrument (Varian Assoc.,
`
`918 spectrophotometer (GBC Scientific Equipment,
`
`Palo Alto, CA USA) at 300.1 MHz. The sample
`
`Victoria, Australia) equipped with an LEO personal
`
`(1 mg) was dissolved in deuterochloroform (CDCI3)
`
`computer and an Epson LX-400 plotter.
`
`or hexadeuterodimethylsulfoxide (DMSO-d6). In
`CDCl,, TMS was used as an internal reference; in
`
`DMSO-d, the central DMSO line was set at 2.50
`ppm.
`
`Infra-red spectroscopy: Infra-red (IR) spectra
`
`(4000—600 cm'1) were recorded on a Model PU 9706
`
`IR spectrophotometer (Philips Nederland B.V.,
`
`Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with the potassium
`
`bromide (KBr) pellet technique. The pellet consisted
`
`of 1 mg of aplidine bulk drug and 200 mg of KBr.
`
`The ratio recording mode was set on autosmooth
`and the scan time was 8 minutes.
`
`Formulation of Aplidi ne
`
`Solubility studies: The solubility of aplidine in
`
`various solvents at ambient temperature (20—25°C)
`
`was
`
`examined
`
`by
`
`accurately weighing
`
`approximately 1 mg of aplidine in a glass test tube
`
`and adding subsequent solvent volumina of 100 uL,
`
`1 mL, and 10 mL to the bulk drug. After each
`
`addition the mixture was vigorously shaken for 30
`
`seconds, placed in an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes
`
`and examined visually under polarized light for
`
`complete dissolution of the aplidine drug substance.
`
`In this way, the solubilities of aplidine in the various
`
`UV/VIS spectroscopy: UV/VIS spectra (800—200
`
`solvents were selectively distributed over four
`
`nm) of aplidine bulk drug (50 ug/mL in 79% (v/v)
`
`solubility ranges (s < 0.1 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL S s <
`
`Figure 1: Chemical structure of aplidine (Hip: hydroxyisovalerylproprionylg Ist: isostatineg Leu: leucine; Pro:
`proline; Pyr: pyruvoylg Thr: thre0nine; Tyr: tyrosine).
`
`[33, 4R, 5S-lst]
`
`[23, 4S-Hip]
`
`
`
`N
`
`A
`
`[(3)-|-ell]
`
`[(3)-Pro]
`
`Q
`
`[(3)'Me2'TV|']
`
`Z
`
`o 0*“:-;~'”*-
`‘*n’LLN,;j_)
`
`[Pyr]
`
`O
`
`~ [
`
`(3)-Pr0]
`
`Vol.54, No.3, May/June 2000
`
`195
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0003
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`1mg/mL, 1mg/mL S s < 10 mg/mL and s > 10 mg/
`
`Formulation process: Aplidine lyophilized product
`
`mL, respectively). In addition, solvents in which
`
`was aseptically prepared from a 500 ug/mL aplidine
`
`aplidine dissolved were examined by diluting the
`
`solution in 40% (v/v) tert-butanol in Wfl contai-
`
`solutions 1:1, 1:5, 1:10, 1:50, and 1:100 (v/v) with
`
`ning 25 mg/mL D-mannitol as a bulking agent. The
`
`normal saline for l1’1fi1SlO1’1 in glass test tubes. After
`
`formulation solution was prepared by weighing
`
`gentle agitation, each of the dilutions was examined
`
`aplidine and D-mannitol and dissolving the
`
`visually under polarized light over a one day period
`
`for any sign of precipitation.
`
`Reconstitution of aplidine lyophilized product with
`
`solutions composed of 40/ 1 0/5 0% (v/v/v) propylene
`
`glycol 400/ethanol/polysorbate 80 (PET), 40/10/5-
`
`0% (v/v/v) propylene glycol 400/ethanol/WfI
`
`(PEW), and 5/5/90% (v/v/v), 15/15/70% (v/v/v), and
`
`30/3 0/40% (v/v/v) Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl was
`
`studied by adding increasing volumes of the
`
`reconstitution solutions to 500 ug aplidine lyophili-
`
`zed cake. After each addition, the resulting mixture
`
`was agitated and subsequently examined visually
`
`under polarized light. Quantitative analysis was
`
`carried out by diluting 50 uL samples of reconstitu-
`
`ted product with 950 uL of acetonitrile and
`
`subsequent injection onto the HPLC system.
`
`Furthermore, in case of complete dissolution, the
`reconstituted solution was diluted 1:10 or 1:100
`
`(v/v) with normal saline for infusion in glass test
`
`tubes. Stability of the reconstituted solution and the
`
`infusion solutions were examined visually under
`
`polarized light and by HPLC without further
`
`dilution, over a 24-hour period at room tempera-
`
`ture (20—25°C) and a normal day-night light cycle.
`
`substances by magnetic stirring in 40% (v/v) tert-
`butanol in Wfl. To make a final concentration of
`
`500 ug/mL aplidine, 40% (v/v) tert-butanol in Wfl
`was added. The formulation solution was sterile
`
`filtered through a 0.2 mm Midisart 2000 filter
`
`(Sartorius, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands). Subse-
`
`quently, 1 mL aliquots of the formulation solution
`
`were filled into 10 mL type 1 glass vials with a
`
`Model 501Dz peristaltic pump (Watson Marlow,
`
`UK). After filling, vials were partially closed with
`
`grey butyl rubber stoppers, placed in a Model
`
`Lyovac GT4 freeze-dryer (AMSCO/FinnAqua,
`
`Germany), and lyophilized. The freeze-dryer was
`
`equipped with a cold trap filled with liquid nitrogen
`
`attached to the condensor to ensure complete
`
`condensation of tert-butanol. After completion of
`
`the freeze-drying cycle, sterile filtered medical grade
`
`nitrogen gas was leaked into the freeze-drying
`chamber to reach a final vacuum of 100 mbar. Subse-
`
`quently, the vials were pneumatically closed,
`
`capped, and labeled. In-process-controls consisted
`
`of integrity testing of the filter unit, weight variation
`
`of the filling volume, and determination of the
`
`aplidine concentration of the formulation solution
`
`before and after filtration. Only clean, sterile inert
`
`materials and glassware were used throughout the
`
`manufacturing process. All critical manipulations
`
`Differential scanning calorimetry: Transition
`
`took place under a class 100 (A) down-flow conditi-
`
`temperatures and freezing characteristics of tert-
`
`on with a class 100 (B) background (Interflow,
`
`butanol, D-mannitol, and aplidine solutions were
`
`Wieringerwerf, The Netherlands). Air particle
`
`examined by differential scanning calorimetry
`
`counts in the critical areas as well as microbiological
`
`(DSC). The DSC experiments were carried out with
`
`contamination of the area and personnel were
`
`a TA Instruments DSC 2920 (TA Instruments, New
`
`monitored at operating state.
`
`Castle (DE), USA) equipped with an LNCA for low
`
`temperatures. Samples were sealed in a closed
`
`Reconstitution solution 15/ 1 5/70% (v/v/v)
`
`aluminium pan with an empty pan as reference.
`
`Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl (CEW) was prepared
`
`Temperature scale and heat flux were calibrated with
`
`by mixing the appropriate volumes of excipients by
`
`indium. Samples were cooled to -50°C at a rate of
`
`magnetic stirring. The solution obtained was filtered
`
`5°C/min. The DSC heating rate was 2.5°C/min.
`
`through a 0.2 mm Midisart 2000 filter unit (Sartorius,
`
`Analyses were performed under a helium purge.
`
`Goettingen, Germany) and subsequently 2 mL
`
`196
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0004
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`aliquots were filled into type 1 glass ampoules with
`
`HPLC analysis: Aplidine was assayed by a
`
`a Model R910 ampoule fill-and-seal machine (Rota
`
`validated, stability-indicating reversed phase-HPLC
`
`den Boer B.V., The Netherlands). After filling, the
`
`method. The HPLC system consisted of a Model
`
`solution was sterilized by autoclaving (Model 6.6.15
`
`SP8800 pump (Thermo Separation Products, USA),
`
`autoclave, Koninklijke Ad Linden B.V., The
`
`a Model Spectra 200 UV-VIS detector (Spectra-
`
`Netherlands) for 20 minutes at 120°C. All
`
`Physics, San Jose, USA), and a Model SP8880
`
`manipulations involving an “open” solution or
`
`autosampler (Thermo Separation Products, USA).
`
`excipient were conducted under class 100 (A)
`
`Analyses were carried out with a Zorbax SB-C18
`
`conditions. The manufacturing of both aplidine
`
`analytical column (4.6 mm ID X 150 mm, particle
`
`lyophilized product and its reconstituted solution
`
`size 3.5 mm, Waters, USA) held at a constant
`
`were performed according to the Good Manufac-
`
`temperature of 80°C with a Model 7971 column
`
`turing Practice (GMP) guidelines (15).
`
`Figure 2: cis/trans isomerism of the pyruvoyl-proline
`amide bond.
`
`o
`
`J
`N
`
`O‘
`\rr&N+D
`
`‘L
`
`O
`
`H-R
`
`0 o
`
`H
`==;-=”-
`'
`
`R
`
`_M__N+
`
`O-
`
`,
`
`P
`
`Quality Control of Aplidi ne Lyophilized Product
`
`Quality control of aplidine lyophilized product
`
`consisted of identification by visual inspection of
`
`appearance and colour of the pharmaceutical
`
`product; determination of
`
`reconstitution
`
`characteristics and pH of the reconstituted product;
`
`content,
`
`content uniformity,
`
`and purity
`
`determination by HPLC analysis, residual moisture
`determination with the Karl-Fischer titration
`
`method, and residual tert-butanol content by gas
`
`chromatographic (GC) analysis. Furthermore,
`
`sterility of the pharmaceutical product was checked
`
`by the filtration method and the presence of bacterial
`
`endotoxins with the limulus amoebocyte lysate
`
`(LAL) test, both carried out according to the
`
`European Pharrnacopeia III.
`
`heater (Jones Chromatography, USA). The mobile
`
`phase at a flow of 0.6 mL/min consisted of a linear
`
`gradient of acetonitrile (ACN) containing 0.04%
`
`trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) 35% to 70% in 15 minutes
`
`and water containing 0.04% TFA. An injection
`
`volume of 20 uL and a total run time of 30 minutes
`
`were used. UV detection was performed at 225 nm.
`
`Under these conditions the chromatogram of
`
`aplidine consisted of a single peak eluting at 21
`
`minutes. A series of standard solutions of aplidine
`
`in ACN in the concentration range of 5 ug/mL to
`
`300 ug/mL were prepared in duplicate from a stock
`
`solution of 1 mg/mL aplidine in ACN and injected
`
`into the HPLC system. Quality control samples at
`
`concentrations of 7.5, 100, 250, and 275 ug/mL of
`
`aplidine in ACN were prepared in quadruplicate
`
`from another stock solution with separate weighing
`
`of aplidine and injected into the HPLC system.
`
`Aplidine lyophilized product was diluted to a test
`
`concentration of 250 ug/mL by dilution with a
`
`solution of 1:1 (v/v) ACN/water. Least squares
`
`regression analysis was used to calculate the slope
`
`and intercept for the standard calibration curve from
`
`measured peak areas versus concentration. Sample
`concentrations were calculated from the
`
`corresponding peak areas using the regression
`
`equation. All aplidine chromatograms were
`
`electronically stored in the computer system
`
`LABNET (Spectra-Physics, San Jose, USA).
`
`Reprocessing of aplidine chromatograms was
`
`performed using PC1000 software (Thermo
`
`Separation Products, USA).
`
`Vol.54, No.3, May/June 2000
`
`197
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0005
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`Resi dual moisture content: Residual moisture levels
`
`in aplidine lyophilized product were determined
`with the Karl-Fischer titration method. The content
`
`of a vial was quantitatively transferred to the titration
`
`Quality Control of Apl idi ne Reconstitution Solution
`
`Quality control of 15/ 15/70% (v/v/v) Cremophor
`EL/ethanol/Wfl reconstitution solution consisted of
`
`unit of a Model 65 8KF titrino apparatus (Metrohm
`
`visual
`
`inspection of the appearance of the
`
`Herisau, Switzerland) with previously dried metha-
`
`pharmaceutical solution and presence of particulate
`
`nol, and subsequently titrated using Hydranal®
`
`matter, determination of the pH, refractive index,
`
`Titrant 2.0 mg H20/mL (Riedel-de Haen, The
`
`relative density, and ethanol content. Also, as
`
`Netherlands). The end-point of the titration was
`
`aplidine lyophilized product, sterility and the
`
`determined biamperometrically.
`
`Residual tert-butanol content: Residual tert-butanol
`
`levels in aplidine lyophilized product were
`
`presence of bacterial endotoxins were examined
`
`according to the European Pharmacopeia III using
`
`the filtration method and LAL test, respectively.
`
`determined by gas chromatographic (GC) analysis.
`
`The specificity of the tests for the refractive index,
`
`The GC system consisted of a Model 5890 gas
`
`relative density, and ethanol content were examined
`
`chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, USA), equipped
`
`by comparing the results of the tests performed on
`
`with a flame ionization detector (FID), a HP-5 cross-
`
`linked phenyl-methyl silicone capillary column
`
`(25 m x 0.32 mm x 0.52 mm film thickness, Hewlett
`
`Packard, USA) and a Model 6890 series autosampler
`
`(Hewlett Packard, USA). The column temperature
`
`was held at 60°C for 2 minutes and was subsequently
`
`linearly ramped to 180°C at a heating rate of
`
`30°C/min and kept at this temperature for 2 minu-
`
`solutions composed of varying ratios of Cremophor
`EL, ethanol and Wfl. The refractive indices and
`
`relative densities of solutions composed of 5/5/90%,
`10/10/80%, 15/15/70%, 20/20/60%, 25/25/50%
`
`(v/v/v) Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl were measured
`and the ethanol content of 10/ 10/80%, 15/ 15/70%,
`
`20/20/60% (v/v/v) Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl
`solutions was determined. Also, to simulate
`
`tes. The injector temperature was kept at 275°C and
`
`erroneous compounding of the excipients, the
`
`the detector temperature at 250°C. An injection
`
`refractive index and relative density of solutions
`
`volume of 1 uL and a run time of 12 minutes were
`
`employed. tert-Butanol standard solutions were
`
`prepared from a 2 mg/mL stock solution in 40% (v/
`
`v) propylene glycol in water in a concentration range
`
`of 20-100 ug/mL. Least square regression analysis
`
`was used to calculate the slope and intercept of the
`
`composed of 15/70/15% and 70/15/15% (v/v/v)
`
`Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl were examined.
`
`Refractive index: The refractive indices of the
`
`various Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl solutions were
`determined on a Model Abbe’ 302 refractometer
`
`standard calibration curve from the measured peak
`
`(Atago, Japan) at 20°C.
`
`areas versus tert-butanol concentration. Sample
`
`solutions were prepared by reconstituting a vial of
`
`Rel ative densi ty: The relative densities ofthe various
`
`aplidine lyophilized product with 3 mL of 40% (v/
`
`Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl solutions were
`
`v) propylene glycol in water and injecting 1 uL onto
`
`determined by accurately weighing 1.00 mL of the
`
`the GC system. The tert-butanol concentrations in
`
`respective solutions on a Model 440 balance
`
`the sample solutions were calculated from the
`
`(Mettler Toledo) at 20°C.
`
`corresponding peak areas using the regression
`
`equation. All tert-butanol chromatograms were
`
`Ethanol content: Ethanol content of Cremophor EL/
`
`electronically stored in the computer system
`
`ethanol/Wfl solutions was determined by GC
`
`LABNET (Spectra-Physics, San Jose, USA).
`
`analysis. The GC system consisted of a Model
`
`Reprocessing of tert-butanol chromatograms was
`
`HP5710A gas chromatograph (Hewlett Packard,
`
`performed using PC1000 software (Thermo
`
`USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector
`
`Separation Products, USA).
`
`(FID) and a Tenax GC 60-80 Mesh 1 m x 2 mm
`
`198
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0006
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`column. The column temperature was held at 105°C.
`
`analysis. 10/10/80%, 15/15/70%, 20/20/60%
`
`The injector and detector temperatures were kept at
`
`200°C. An injection Volume of 1 uL and a run-time
`
`(V/V/V) Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl solutions were
`diluted to a theoretical ethanol concentration of
`
`of 5 minutes were employed. Standard solutions
`
`1.6%o with distilled water. Before injection onto the
`
`containing approximately 0.75%o, 2.5%o and 4%o
`
`GC system, each sample was diluted 1:1 (V/V) with
`
`ethanol were prepared by weighing accurately
`
`the internal standard solution. Subsequently, 1 uL
`
`approximately 75 mg, 250 mg and 400 mg of
`
`of the resulting solution was injected into the GC
`
`absolute ethanol, respectively, into a 100 mL
`
`system. From the obtained ethanol/2-propanol peak
`
`Volumetric flask and adding distilled water to reach
`a final Volume of 100.0 mL. As an internal standard,
`
`ratios, the ethanol concentration (%o) was calculated
`with the standard calibration curve. The ethanol
`
`a solution containing approximately 3.5%o
`
`content of the Cremophor EL/ethanol/Wfl solution
`
`2-propanol was
`
`prepared
`
`by weighing
`
`was calculated by dividing the obtained ethanol
`
`approximately 350 mg of2-propanol into a 100 mL
`
`concentration (%o) by the theoretical ethanol
`
`Volumetric flask and adding distilled water to reach
`
`concentration (%o), times 100%.
`
`a final Volume of 100.0 mL. Before injection into
`
`the GC system, each ethanol standard was diluted
`
`Shelf-life Studies
`
`1:1 (V/V) with the internal standard solution.
`
`Subsequently,
`
`1 uL of the resulting solution was
`
`injected into the GC system. From the obtained
`
`Long-terrn stability of aplidine lyophilized product
`was studied at +2—8°C in the dark. Content and
`
`ethanol/2-propanol peak ratios, a calibration curve
`
`purity of the lyophilized product were determined
`
`was calculated using least squares regression
`
`by HPLC analysis.
`
`Figure 3: Chromatogram obtained with an isocratic HPLC system showing the double-peak for aplidine due to
`cis/trans isomerism of the pyruvoyl-proline amide bond (concentration of 60 ug/mL aplidine in ACN).
`
`0.025
`
`0.02
`
`0.015
`
`mAU
`
`0.01
`
`0.005
`
`Vol.54, No.3, May/June 2000
`
`199
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Time (minutes)
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0007
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`Figure 4: Representative chromatogram of aplidine (Rt of 21 minutes) obtained with stability-indicating gradi-
`
`ent HPLC system (concentration of 250 pg/mL aplidine in ACN).
`
`0.2
`
`0.18
`
`0.16
`
`0.14
`
`0.12
`
`0.1
`
`0.08
`
`0.06
`
`0.04
`
`0.02
`
`mAU
`
`0.00
`
`5.00
`
`10.00
`
`15.00
`
`20.00
`
`25.00
`
`30.00
`
`Time (minutes)
`
`Figure 5: DSC thermogram of aplidine formulation solution (500pLg/mL aplidine and 25 mg/mL D-mannitol in
`40% v/v tert-butanol/water).
`
`0.0
`
`-0.5
`
`5E
`
`.
`E -1.0
`LI.
`‘is’(D
`:|:
`
`-1.5
`
`-2.0
`/\
`exo
`
`200
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`Temperature (YC)
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0008
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Characterization of Apl i di ne
`
`Infra-red spectroscopy: Major assignments are
`
`presented in Table 1.
`
`FAB-MS: The FAB-MS shows the protonated
`
`molecular ion [M+H]* at m/z 1110.7. The major
`
`fragmentations are represented in Table 1 and are
`
`indicative of the structure of aplidine.
`
`H PLC analysis: The existence of multiple
`
`conformations of aplidine as described in the NMR
`
`section complicated the development of a stability-
`
`indicating HPLC method. The initial assays, both
`
`‘H-NM R: Table 1 gives the partial assignments for
`
`normal phase and isocratic and gradient reverse
`
`the 1H-NMR spectrum in CDCL3, based on 1D
`
`phase high-perforrnance liquid chromatographic
`
`proton and 2D HH-COSY spectra. Two conformers
`
`(HPLC) methods, showed the presence of two
`
`appear to be present in an approximately 1:1 ratio
`
`(NH protons and methyl protons of the pyruvoyl
`
`group). The existence of two conformers relating to
`
`cis/trans isomerism of the pyruvoyl-proline amide
`
`bond was also shown with “C NMR (4). The
`
`spectrum in DMSO-d6 shows the presence of even
`
`four conformations in approximately a 35 :35: 15: 15
`
`ratio (methyl protons of the pyruvoyl group). The
`
`additional signals probably originate from Ci ytr ans
`
`isomerism of the second proline amide bond. This
`
`hypothesis was examined by carrying out
`
`temperature experiments in DMS0-d6 at 105°C
`
`which showed that only the signals for the pyruvoyl
`
`methyl group are still present at this elevated
`
`temperature. In the CDCL3 spectrum, the threonine
`
`NH signal of one conformer is more shielded than
`that of the other conformer. This indicates that the
`
`two conformers arise, indeed, as a result of Ci ytr ans
`
`isomerism at the pyruvoylproline residue (Fig. 2).
`From the literature the occurrence of more than one
`
`conformation in proline-containing peptides is well-
`
`known (16,17). The proline residue and Ci ytrans
`
`isomerization is extremely important in the folding,
`
`denaturation, and renaturation of polypeptides and
`
`proteins, and might also be a factor in the biological
`
`activity of aplidine.
`
`aplidine peaks in the chromatograms referring to the
`
`equilibrium between the cis and trans isomers of
`
`the pyruvoyl-proline amide bond (18). At ambient
`
`temperature (20—25°C) this equilibrium appears too
`
`slow to elute both isomers as one peak but also too
`
`fast to elute them as two baseline-separated peaks
`
`(Fig. 3). By lowering the column temperature this
`
`equilibrium is frozen, thus resulting in improved
`resolution. Collection of one of the individual
`
`conformations at the detector outlet and reinj ection
`
`of the component results again in a double-peak,
`
`indicating a continuous interconversion of both
`
`conformers. Although quantification of aplidine
`
`concentrations on the total area of both isomer peaks
`
`was satisfactory, the stability-indicating capability
`
`of the assay was not. It was proven that upon stress-
`
`testing of aplidine solutions degradation products
`
`co-eluted with the aplidine isomer peaks. Therefore,
`
`at present a gradient HPLC method with a column
`
`temperature of 80°C is employed. Due to this high
`
`column temperature aplidine elutes as a single peak.
`
`Furthermore, this method shows good selectivity for
`
`impurities and degradation products. A represen-
`
`tative chromatogram of aplidine is given in Fig. 4.
`
`Aplidine elutes at a retention time (R) of approxi-
`
`mately 21 minutes. The peaks eluting at
`
`UV/VIS spectrophotometry: The UV spectrum of
`
`approximately 14 and 20 minutes, respectively, are
`
`aplidine shows absorption maxima at 212 and 273
`
`impurities of the aplidine bulk drug. Identification
`
`nm, respectively (Table 1).
`
`of these impurities is ongoing.
`
`Vol.54, No.3, May/June 2000
`
`201
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0009
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`Table 1: Identification and characterization of aplidine bulk drug (Lot APL-297)
`
`Analytical Method
`
`Results
`
`Appearance
`
`FAB-MS
`
`‘H NMR (CDCI3)
`
`UV/VIS
`spectrophotometry
`
`IR spectroscopy
`
`Pale beige, amorphous powder
`
`Molecular formula: C37H37N7O33; Protonated molecular ion [M+H]+
`1110.7; 1040.7 [M+H]+-70, CH3COCO; 985.6 [M+H]+-125, Pro-CO;
`943.6 [M+H]+-167, pyruvoyl-Pro; 859.5 [M+H]+-251, Leu-diMe-keto-
`OH-hexanoic acid-H3O; 816.0 [M+H]+-294, pyruvoyl-Pro-N-Me-Leu;
`701.4 [M+H]+-409, Leu-diMe-keto-OH-hexanoic acid-NH3-OH-Me-
`heptanoic acid-NH; 295.2, pyruvoyl-Pro-N-Me-Leu; 177.1, Tyr-CH3
`(N-CH3); 169.1, pyruvoyl-Pro
`
`Proposed assignments:
`Amino acid residue: Pro/ine (1): 6 4.70 H-oc; 2.10 H-B3; 1.95 H-B3;
`3.66 H-63; 3.84 H-63; 2.54/2.52 CH3CO; N-Me-Leucine: 6 3.15/3.11
`N-CH3; 4.62 H-oc; 2.15 H-B3; 1.78 H-B3; 1.28 H-y; 0.90 CH3; Threonine:
`7.61/7.05 NH3; 4.57/4.65 H-oc; 5.29/5.17 H-B; 1.41/1.40 y-CH3;
`4-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylheptanoic acid: 7.20/7.19 NH3; 3.25 H-oc3;
`2.62 H-on 3; 4.08 H-8; 4.08 H-y; 1.80 H-5; 1.64 6-CH3; 0.90 H-5; 0.90 e-
`CH3; 2, 5-diMe-hydroxy-3-ketohexanoic acid: 4.23/4.19 H-oc; 1.33/1.32
`on-CH3; 5.40 H-y; 1.70 H-6; 0.90 6-CH3; Leucine: 7.86/7.81 NH3; 4.80
`H-oc; 1.60 H-I31; 1.20 H-B3; 0.90 CH3; Pro/ine (2): 5.10 H-oc; 2.90 H-B3;
`1.90 H-I32; N,O-diMe-tyrosine: 3.80 O—CH3; 2.54 N-CH3; 3.57 H-oc; 3.36
`H431; 3.16 H432; 7.08 H-1,4; 6.85 H-2,3
`
`Absorption maxima at 212 and 273 nm
`
`Characteristic absorption bands (approximately):
`3340 cm‘: N-H stretching (amide); 2960/2880 cm‘: C-H stretching
`(aliphatic); 1740 cm‘: C=O stretching; 1640 cm‘: N-C=O stretching
`(amide); 1520 cm‘: C=C stretching (aromatic); 1450 cm:‘: C-H
`deformation; 1250 cm:‘: phenolic C-O; 1170/1070 cm‘: C-O
`stretching;
`820 cm:‘: C-H bending of paradisubstituted benzene
`
`Solubility Studies
`
`Cremophor EL/ethanol did not precipitate over a
`
`24-hour period. Apparently, a cosolvent in combi-
`
`Table 2 gives the approximate solubilities of aplidine
`
`nation with a micelle-forming agent is necessary to
`
`in various solvent systems. Solvents were chosen
`
`on the basis of current use and experience in clinical
`
`practice (l4, l9). Aplidine is very poorly soluble in
`
`solubilize aplidine and make it suitable for further
`dilution in infusion solution.
`
`water, but dissolves well in a number of organic
`
`Initial stability studies showed that aplidine in
`
`solvents. Furthermore, aplidine has high solubilities
`
`solution degrades under the influence of light and
`
`in 60/40/10% (v/v/v) polyethylene glycol 400/
`
`heat. Therefore, to increase the stability, it was
`
`ethanol/polysorbate 80 (PET) and 50/50% (v/v) Cre-
`
`decided to develop a lyophilized dosage form. As
`
`mophor EL/ethanol cosolvent/surfactant systems.
`
`the aqueous solubility of aplidine is very poor,
`
`However, upon dilution with normal saline up to l: 100
`
`another suitable freeze-drying medium had to be
`
`(v/v), only aplidine solubilized in 50/5 0% (v/v)
`
`found. On the basis of previously reported studies,
`
`202
`
`PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`FRESENIUS KABI 1027-0010
`
`

`
`Downloaded from journa|.pda.org on December 4, 2014
`
`50% (v/v) polyethylene glycol 4000 in water and
`various concentrations of tert-butanol in water were
`
`consisting of 500 ug/mL aplidine and 25 mg/mL
`
`D-mannitol as bulking agent in 40% (v/v) tert-
`
`selected as alter

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket