throbber
jnumal of Colloid and lnterfacc Science III], 8-1".-' [I999]
`Article lDjcis.1993.5'.I'T6_ available online at hup:.=';'mnv.idealibrnrycom unl II E
`

`
`Aggregation Behavior of Tyloxapol, a Nonionic Surfactant
`Oligomer, in Aqueous Solution
`
`.-'.t‘r'aef: and i‘.-’rr.s'!il'rr.' C. Srra"rort l'CNRS).
`‘Department! of C}rt'rrrr't‘rrl' Errgr'rrer‘r’r'rt_r;. Berr—Gm‘r'on Urrit-1=r‘.ril_1'. 8-Hflfi Brershe-\‘a.
`6 me Brnrssingarrlr.
`t‘i?l’lr‘lu"l S::'osbo:rrg. Frame
`
`Oren Regev"' and Raoul zanar-'
`
`Received March 26. 1998; accepted July 29, I993
`
`The aggregation behavior of Tyloxapoi. a nonionic surfactant
`oligomer with a repeating unit close to Triton X-100 (TX10[l}. and
`a maximum degree of polymerization of about 7. has been inves-
`tigated i.n aqueous solution by means of fluorescence probing,
`time-resolved fluorescence quenching (TRFQ) and transmission
`electron microscopy at cryogenic temperature (cryo—TEM}. The
`plot of the pyrene fluorescence intensity ratio l',l'I3 against the
`Tyloirapol concentration shows no clear evidence of a critical
`micelle concentration contrary to TXIDB. Nevertheless. the fitting
`of these data. assuming a partition of pyrene between Tyloxapol
`aggregates and water. yields ctuc values in the micromolar range.
`i.e., about a hundred times lower than for the "monomer" TXIIJD.
`The values of IJI3 at high surfactant concentrations indicate that
`Tyloxapol micelles provide pyrene a less polar environment than
`TX100 micelles. The use of the viscosity-sensitive probe 1.3-
`dipyrenyipropane indicates that the rnicroviscosity of Tyloxapol
`micelles is quite high. three to four times larger than that for
`TXl[l0 micelles. and decreases rapidly with increasing tempera-
`ture. Also the rnicroviscosities of both TXIOIJ and Tyloxapol mi-
`celles are larger than those for the micelles of the nonionic ethoxy—
`lated surfactant CREE: The aggregation numbers of Tyloxapol
`and of TX 100 micelles measured using TRFQ increase with tem-
`perature. with the Tyloxapol micelles being smaller than the
`TXIDO micelles. Cryo-TEM shows that the Tyloxapol micelles
`remain spheroidal up to a concentration of about ll} wt%. At 15
`wt%. some regions of ordered elongated micelles are also observed
`which may be the precursors of the hexagonal phase known to
`occur at about 35 wt%.
`o 1999 Academic hm
`
`Key Words: nonionic surfactant oligomer: Triton X-100: Tylox-
`apol; aggregation in aqueous solution: cmc; micelle shape; micelle
`microviscosity.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`In recent years a new class of surfactants which can be broadly
`referred to as surfactant oligomers has attracted increasing interest
`{I-5}. Surfactant oligomers are made up of two or more am-
`phiphilic moieties connected at the level of. or very close to. the
`head groups by a spacer group. The surfactant dimers, also re-
`ferred to as gemini surfactants (2). have been the most investi-
`
`‘ To tvhurn correspondence should be addressed.
`
`l'K'I2I—9'i"l'.n":"}9 530 flfl
`Copyright ii [999 by Academic Press
`All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
`
`and olig-
`surfactant dimers
`in
`interest
`gated. The
`omers is due to the fact that they are characterized by much lower
`critical micelle concentration (cmc) values and much stronger
`surface tension lowering action then the conesponding conven-
`tional (rnonomeric) surfactants ( 1-5). These two properties deter-
`mine most uses of surtactants in formulations. Surfactant trimers
`
`and tctramers are characterized by even lower cmc values than
`surfactant dimers (6-8). The work on surfactant dimers and
`oligomers has been recently reviewed (3-5). Thus far. the reported
`studies have essentially concerned cationic and anionic surfactant
`dimers. There has been no report on the properties of nonionic
`surfactant oligomcrs. probably because of difficulties in their
`synthesis. However. a nonionic surfactant oligorner. refened to as
`Tyloxapol, has been synthesized and described (9. 10) and can be
`obtained from chemical manufacturers. Tyloxapol is very close to
`being an oligomer of the much investigated Triton X—|00
`{TXlD0; see chemical structures in Scheme 1). The micelle for-
`
`mation by Tyloxapol and the phase diagrams of Tyloxapolfwater
`and Tyloxapol/TXl0Olwater mixtures have been investigated
`(I143). In view of our current interest in surfactant oligomers
`and the availability of Tyloxapol we decided to investigate its
`aggregation behavior in aqueous solution and to compare it to that
`of its monomer, TXIOO. For this purpose we made use of fluo-
`rescence probing using the probes pyrene (cmc. micelle polarity)
`and 1,3-dipyrenylpropane (micelle microviscosity} (i4—l6). We
`also used tirne-resolved fluorescence quenching (micelle agre-
`gmion numbers) (l?—2(l'} and transmission electron microscopy at
`cryogenic temperature (direct imaging of the aggregates in the
`surfactant solutions‘) (21). The results reveal important differences
`between the properties of the micelles of Tyloxapol and TXIOO
`and also between their aggregation behaviors.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`M’arer'r'als
`
`The sample of TXI00 (Aldrich Chemicals- Europe} was
`used as received. A sample of Tyloxapol {Sigma} was exten-
`sively clialyzed against water using dialysis bags with a cutoff
`of about 1500 Da and the surfactant was recovered by exten-
`sive vacuum rotatory evaporation first under 15 mm mercury
`
`{PD
`j‘‰‚“Ž‚ fyRQSQM q‚ˆ† R
`lnnopharma EX1020, Page 1
`
`

`
`AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR OF TYLOXAPOL TN AQUEOUS SOLUTION
`
`9
`
`
`
`Triton X-100
`
`x= 9-10
`
`SCHEME 1.
`
`Tyloxapoi
`
`J: = 8-10 It < 6
`
`Chemical structures of Triton X-100 and of Tyloxapol {EO= —CH,Cl-110-).
`
`then under 1 mm mercury, at 40°C. The water content of the
`samples of raw and dialyzed Tyloxapol and of TXIOO were
`measured using Karl—Fisher titration and found to be below I
`wr%. The concentrations given below have been corrected for
`that water content. The raw Tyloxapol was examined by size
`exclusion chromatography (solvent: tetrahydrofuran; four col-
`umns filled with beads of polystyrene cross-linked by divinyl-
`benzene, of diameter 10 um and of pore sizes 5, 10, 50, and
`100 rim; detection: UV absorption or index of refraction). The
`chromatogram is shown in Fig. 1. Using the method reported in
`(22), this chrornatogram was decomposed in a sum of four
`components corresponding to the monomer, dimer. trimer. and
`
`(a.u.)
`
`signal
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`28
`
`30
`
`Elution volume (ml)
`FIG. 1. Chromatogram of a 3 M16 solution of raw Tyloxapol in tetrahy-
`d1'ofIJ1'an. The signal (ordinate scale) is proportional to the refractive index of
`the eluted solution. The chromatognun has been analyzed according to the
`method in Ref. (22). Curve E is the experimental chromatogmntt Curves l, 2.
`3. and 4 correspond to the monomer. dimer. trimer. and higher oligorner.
`respectively. The broken line curve is the sum of curves 1 to 4.
`
`higher oligomers with percentages in weight of about 4.4, [0,
`16.9, and 68.7, respectively (Fig. I). The nonionic surfactant
`nonaethyleneglycol monododecyl ether (CIZE9) was purchased
`from Flnka and used as received. The clouding temperatures of
`aqueous solutions of CHE9, TX100, and Tyloxapol at a con-
`centration of 3 wt% were found to be 83 1 0-5, 65.9 t 0.2, and
`90 : 1°C, respectively.
`The fluorescence probes pyrene (purified by zone melting)
`and 1,3-dipyrenylpropane (DPP, fi'om Molecular Probes, used
`without further purification) were the same as in previous
`studies (7). The quenchers of the pyrcne fluorescence used for
`aggregation ntnnber determinations were dimethyIbenzophe-
`none (DMBP) (23) and tetradccylcyanopyridinium chloride
`(TCNPC) (24).
`Water purifed using a Millipore Milli-R0 3Plus (resistance
`>18 int!) was used for the preparation of all solutions. The
`surfactant concentrations are expressed in wt% or in moi/L on
`the basis of molecular weights of 624 g/mo] for TXi00 and 636
`g/mol for the repeating unit ot"l'y1oxapol. These values assume
`an average of 9.5 ethoxy units per molecule or repeating unit
`(11-13).
`
`illerhods
`
`Spectrafluorometry. The pyrene emission spectra were re-
`corded using a Hitachi F4010 spcctrofluorometer and used to
`obtain the ratio I J13 of the intensities of the fir-st and third
`vibronic peaks in the emission spectra of pyrene solubilizcd in
`the micellar solutions. The excitation wavelength was set at
`335 nm. For conventional surfactants the variation of J’.H',
`with the surfactant concentration C permits one to obtain the
`mic. In addition, the value of I,z'I3 at C $ cmc gives a
`measure of the polarity sensed by pyrenc at its micelle solu-
`bilization site (14, 15).
`The emission spectra of DPP were recorded using the same
`spectrofluorometer in the range from 350 and 550 nm, using an
`excitation wavelength of 346 nm. These spectra showed an
`
`j‘‰‚“Ž‚ fyRQSQM q‚ˆ† S
`Innopharma EX1020, Page 2
`
`

`
`10
`
`REGEV AND ZANA
`
`emission due to the monomeric font: of DPP in the range
`360-400 nm with four vibronic peaks (IM, intensity of the first
`peak located near 378 nm) and a broad emission maximum
`arising from the excimer form of DPP, centered at 485-490 nm
`(intensity IE). The product of the intensity ratio IMIIE by
`fluorescence lifetime TE of the DPP excimer is proportional to
`the microviscosity of the surroimding medium (25, 26). The
`intensities [M and IE were measured using air-saturated solu-
`tions. The lifetimes in the same solutions were measured using
`a single photon counting apparatus (23, 24) at an excitation
`wavelength of 335 rim and monitoring the emission using a
`high-pass Kodak gelatin filter 4 (It > 460 nm).
`
`Time-resolved flhrorescence quenching. We attempted to
`measure the aggregation numbers of Tyloxapol and TXl00
`micelles in aqueous solution using the time-resolved fluores-
`cence quenching method (TRFQ) (15, 17-20) with pyrene as
`the fluorescent probe and DMBP or TCNPC as quenchers. The
`fluorescence decay curves were recorded using the same single
`photon counting apparatus which included a Twe 7450 EGG-
`Ortec multichannel analyzer with a time base of 1024 channels
`(23, 24). As usual, the pyrene concentration was adjusted to be
`of about
`1
`to 2% of the mioelle molar concentration, [M],
`whereas the quencher molar concentration, [Q], was adjusted
`to be close to
`(i.e., an average of one quencher per
`micelle). Prior to each experiment, the solutions investigated
`were deaerated by three successive freeze—pump—thaw cycles.
`The following fluorescence decay equations (17-20) were fit-
`ted to the experimental fluorescence decay curves of pyrene in
`the absence and in the presence of the quencher, respectively,
`using a weighted least-squares procedure (23, 24):
`
`!(r) = l’(0)exp(-1.x’-r)
`
`Hr) = !(0)exp{—A2t - Asil ~* exptl - AJ)]}.
`
`[1]
`
`[2]
`
`In these equations {(0) and 1(1) are the fluorescence intensities
`at time 0 and I, r is the pyrene excited state lifetime in the
`absence of the quencher, and A2, A 3, and A4 are three fining
`parameters. The micelle aggregation ntnnber, N, the rate con-
`stant for intramicellar quenching, Ito, and the rate constant for
`probe andlor quencher exchange between micelles, kg, may
`then be determined from
`
`N = Alllc — cmc)»’[Q]}[l + er
`
`to = Am + e]
`
`k, = A, - kg = A.,e.*'(1 + e),
`
`[3]
`
`[41
`
`[5]
`
`where C is the surfactant concentration in mole per (ll'|13 (15,
`11-20), with
`
`E = (A2 ' 'r")!’AsA.:-
`
`[6]
`
`
`
`10"‘
`
`10"
`
`10"
`
`10"
`
`10'
`
`c (awn
`FIG. 2. Variations of I,:’l’, with the surfactant concentration at 10°C (0,
`I), 25°C (El, I), and 40°C (A, L) for Tyloxapol (O, A, El) and TXIOO (O, A,
`I). The solid lines going through the data points are only guides to the eye.
`
`The overall error on the aggregation number is estimated to
`be of 110%.
`
`Cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEAO. The
`specimens are prepared by blotting a 511.1 drop of the sample
`on a lacey carbon substrate (300 mesh, Ted Pella Inc-) in a
`controlled environment vitrification system (CEVS) (27),
`where temperature is controlled by a bulb and relative humidity
`is kept above 95% by a wet sponge to prevent sample evapo-
`ration. The specimen is blotted by a filter paper, resulting in the
`formation ofa very thin sample film suspended over the grid,
`which is then vitrified very quickly in liquid ethane maintained
`at the liquid nitrogen temperature, 83 K (— l90.l5°C). The
`CEVS operation retains the original composition of the sample
`so that the original microstructures remain unaltered in the
`vitrified specimen. The vitrified specimen is then transferred by
`means of a Gatan cryoholder into a JEOL l200EXII electron
`microscope operating at 100 H1’
`in the conventional TEM
`mode with nominal underfocus of about 4 pm. The images are
`recorded at 83 K on S0-I63 film. The low-dose mode of the
`
`electron beam is used to reduce radiation damage by the
`electron beam.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`The core and Micelle Micropofarity
`
`Figure 2 shows the variations of the 1.0, ratio with the surfbo-
`tant concentration, C, for Tyloxapol and TXl00 at 10, 25, and
`40°C. The 11/I3 vs C plots for the raw and dialyzed samples of
`Tyloxapol were determined at 25°C and found to be coincident.
`This is not surprising in view of the very low fraction of monomer
`(4%) contained in the raw sample and which may be eliminated
`by dialysis. All of the measurements below refer to the raw
`sample. In all instances the intensity ratio shows a sigmoida]
`
`j‘‰‚“Ž‚ fyRQSQM q‚ˆ† T
`Innopharma EX1020, Page 3
`
`

`
`AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR OF TYLOXAPOL TN AQUEOUS SOLUTION
`
`11
`
`decrease upon increasing C, revealing that pyrene goes fiom a
`hydrophilic to a hydrophobic environment. The latter is provided
`by surfactant aggregates when present
`in the solution with a
`sufficient volume fraction to solubilize pyrene. The two sets of
`results show important differences.
`First, for Tyloxapol, the concentration range where most of
`the decrease of IIII3 occurs is about 10-fold lower than that for
`TXl00, showing that this surfactant oligomer provides pyrene
`with hydrophobic microdomains at a much lower concentration
`than its monomer. The crnc range of TXl00 is seen to be
`around 0.01 Wt‘/o, i.e., 0.15 mM. The crnc of TXl00 can be
`obtained using two approaches.
`
`is taken as the concentration corresponding to the
`It
`1.
`intercept of the extrapolations of the high concentration part
`and of the rapidly varying part of the IIII3 vs C plot (28). The
`crnc values are then found to be 0.012, 0.024, and 0.024 wt%
`which is about 0.19. 0.38, and 0.38 mM at 10, 25, and 40°C,
`respectively.
`2. For several ionic and nonionic surfactants with the crnc in
`
`the 0.1 mM range the comparison of the electrical conductance
`or surface tension vs C plots and of the M13 ratio vs C plots
`showed that the crnc, obtained for the conductance or surface
`tension plots (true crnc), closely corresponds to the concentra-
`tion at the infiection point of the 1, {[3 ratio vs C plot (29-31).
`This concentration is also very close to that at mid-decrease of
`the fill, ratio. Using this procedure, the TXl00 crnc values
`were found to be 0.05, 0.10, and 0.12 wt% (that is, 0.08, 0.16,
`and 0.19 mM) at 10, 25, and 40°C. respectively.
`
`The crnc of TX I 00 has been reported to be between 0.25 and
`0.2? mM at 25°C (32-34), a value between the ones given
`above at this temperature.
`The second difference between Tyloxapol and TXI00 is that
`the decrease of [1313 is much less steep for the former, stretch-
`ing over nearly two decades of concentration for Tyloxapol
`against about one decade for TXl00. In addition, there is no
`really sharp change at the end of the decrease for Tyloxapol,
`contrary to TXIOO. This complicates the determination of the
`“crnc” for Tyloxapol. Indeed. pyrene reports a partly hydro-
`phobic environment already at a concentration of, say, 3 )4
`l0_‘' wt% (i.e., 5 X 10_° M). However, the cute, if it exists,
`may be located at an even lower concentration. Indeed at such
`a low amphiphile concentration the volume of the hydrophobic
`pseudo-phase is very small and a significant fraction of pyrene
`remains in the water, thereby reporting a partly aqueous envi-
`ronment even at concentrations above the crnc- The 1,113 plots
`for Tyloxapol look very much like those characterizing sys-
`tems with very low or zero crnc, where pyrene is progressively
`partitioned into hydrophobic aggregates, as the concentration
`of the amphiphile is increased (35).
`In such systems.
`the
`experimental fluorescence intensity ratio can be written in the
`form (35)
`
`Ii”: = (Il;‘r3)Ag ‘l’ lulflaiw ‘ (fr/Islsg]/[1 ‘l’ K(C' 91310)]:
`
`[7]
`
`I!
`
`0.4
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.2
`
`10"
`
`C {%wt)
`
`FIG. 3. Variations of the normalized fluorescence intensity ratio R with
`the surfactant concentration for Tyloxapol at 10°C (0), 25°C (El), and 40°C
`(A). The curves in solid lines 1, 2, and 3 have been calculated using Eq. [8]
`with the values K = 1434, 934, and 480 (wt%)“, and mm = 1.1 X 10"‘,
`1.4 X 10"‘, and 0.7 X 10“ wt%, at 10. 25 and 40°C, respectively.
`
`where (1.r'I3)w and (1J13)A3 are the values of the intensity
`ratio in water and in the aggregate (that is, at C 3- cute), and
`K is an apparent binding constant of pyrene to the aggregates
`(Kf55.5 is in fact the partition coefficient of pyrene between
`the hydrophobic domains considered as a pseudo-phase and
`water). The data in Fig. 2 have been normalized and replotted
`in Fig. 3 as R against C using a serni-logarithmic scale for the
`concentration, with R given by
`
`R = ill”: “ UIH3lag]il(1IH3)w ‘ (-{lf"3.)Ag:i
`
`= 1."[l + K(C — crncl].
`
`[8}
`
`The quantity R varies between 1 and 0 upon increasing C. It
`represents the fraction of pyrene solubilized in the aggregates.
`its variation with log C is an S-shaped curve and R = 0.5 for
`C - crnc = UK. The R vs log C plots permit an easier
`comparison between surfactants of differing (I 1:’!3) Ag and also
`an easy visualization of the quality of the fit of Eq. [8] to the
`data. The plots 1-3 have been calculated using Eq. [8] with
`appropriate values of the binding constant and of the crnc given
`in the legend to Fig. 3. These plots are seen to provide a good
`fit for the Tyloxapol results at 25 and 40°C. The fit is somewhat
`less satisfactory at 10°C. The differences which may exist
`between the calculated curves and the data have been discussed
`
`and attributed to the large change of pyrene concentration in
`the aggregates at concentrations close to the crnc (35). The cure
`values thus obtained are very inaccurate, around 10-4 wt%,
`which is 1.6 ,uM, at the three temperatures investigated. This
`value is very low, much lower than that for TXIOO. However,
`our results do not pennit one to conclude whether the aggre-
`gates capable of binding pyrene in Tyloxapol solutions result
`from an aggregation of Tyloxapol around the pyrene mole-
`
`j‘‰‚“Ž‚ fyRQSQM q‚ˆ† U
`Innopharma EX1020, Page 4
`
`

`
`12
`
`REGEV AND ZANA
`
`~
`I
`E
`
`18.4 ma
`
`15.6
`
`152
`
`1-.
`3
`.1"
`E
`
`3.1
`
`3.2
`
`3.3
`
`3.4
`
`3.5
`
`1o’rr
`
`FIG. 5. Variations of the micelle microviscosity (solid lines) for Tylox-
`apol (El), TXIOO (O). and CHE, (£5), and corresponding variations of the
`lifetime of the DPP excimer (broken lines) for Tyloxapol (I). TXJOO (I), and
`C.2E., (A), with temperature.
`
`because of the extremely low values of the excimer intensity
`which reflect extremely large values of the microviscosity. The
`‘TEIMHE values for Tyloxapol solutions below 40°C must be
`considered lower bound values.
`
`Figures 4 and 5 show the variations of 1-EIM/IE with con-
`centration and temperature (T), respectively, for Tyloxapol
`and TX100. In all instances the microviscosity of Tyloxapol
`aggregates is larger than that of TXIOO. A similar difference
`has been found between the microviscosity values of ionic
`surfactant oligomets and their corresponding monomers (7).
`Figure 4 shows that the microviscosity is nearly independent of
`the TXl00 concentration but decreases somewhat as the T3110):-
`apol concentration is increased- Figure 5 shows that the uni-
`croviscosity of both Tyloxapol and TX100 aggregates de-
`creases steeply as the temperature increases. In the semi-
`logarithmic representation adopted in Fig. 5 (Int:-EIMIIE)
`against III‘) the plots are linear; that is, one can write
`
`TEIMHE = ("'£1'M”Elo°XP(‘E:NfTl-
`
`[9]
`
`The slopes of the plots in Fig. 4 yield the values 61.2 and 62.2
`Id/mol for the activation energy E: of the microviscosity for
`TXIOO and Tyloxapol micelles, respectively. Also represented
`in Fig. 5 are the semi-logaritlunic variations of the lifetime T5
`of the DPP excimer with UT. The plots are linear and yield the
`values 16.8 and 1 I .8 lclfrnol for the activation energy E of T5
`for TX100 and Tyloxapol.
`For the sake of comparison we have also represented in Fig.
`5 the variations of the values of 1'5 and of the micellar micro-
`viseosity for the nonionic ethoxylated surfactant CHE9. It is
`seen that the microviscosity of CHE; micelles is lower than
`that for TXIOU and Tyloxapol micelles in the entire range of
`temperatures investigated. The activation energies for ‘TB and
`
`j‘‰‚“Ž‚ fyRQSQM q‚ˆ† V
`Innopharma EX1020, Page 5
`
`cules, or reflect the solubilization or binding ofpyrene to single
`Tyloxapol molecules which would be able to form intramolec-
`ular micelles, or arise from a true intennolecular association of
`Tyloxapol molecules as for normal amphiphiles at above the
`cute. In the latter case our cmc value would be much smaller
`
`than that advanced by Westesen and Koch (12). Note that ionic
`surfactant oligomers have consistently been found to have
`much lower cmc values than the corresponding monomers. A
`similar behavior is expected for Tyloxapol with respect to
`TX] 00-
`
`The third difference between TXIOO and Tyloxapol is that at
`C > cine, as the temperature is decreased from 40 to 10°C, the
`value of I 1113 increases from about 1.32 to 1.44 for TX] 00, but
`remains nearly constant at about 1.32 for Tyloxapol. At 25°C
`the values of)’,/I3 are 1.32 and 1.4 for Tyloxapol and TXIOO,
`respectively, indicating that the micelles of Tyloxapol provide
`pyrene with an environment of lower polarity than TXIOO
`micelles (I4, 15). However, at 40°C, Tyloxapol and TXIOO
`micelles are characterized by about the same value of I 1:’!3.
`
`Microvismshy
`
`The values of the DPP excirner lifetime and of the ratio
`
`IMIIE were determined for Tyloxapol and TXl00 solutions at
`different concentrations and temperatures. We did not attempt
`to calculate absolute microviscosities from the results. Indeed
`
`this involves the use of a calibration plot (plot of TEIMIIE vs
`viscosity for a series of liquids of known viscosity) and the
`microviscosities thus obtained depend on the calibration curve
`used (36). Since we were essentially interested in comparing
`the micellar microviscosities of Tyloxapol and of its monomer
`TX100, all the results below concern the values of the product
`TEIMIIE which is referred to as microviscosity even though it is
`realized that it is only proportional to the rnicroviscosity. At the
`outset it should be stated that the measurements of {M/IE for
`Tyloxapol solutions at temperatures below 40°C were diflicult
`
` 0
`
`‘III
`
`2|!
`
`3|}
`
`6 (%wt)
`FIG. 4. Variations of the micelle microviscosity with the surfactant con-
`centration for Tyloxapol (O) and TXIOD (I) at 45°C.
`
`

`
`AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR OF TYLOXAPOL TN AQUEOUS SOLUTION
`
`13
`
`TABLE I
`
`Results of TRFQ Studies of Tyloxapol and TX100 Solutions
`
`Surfactant
`
`C (w't%)
`
`T(°C)
`
`Quencher
`
`-r(ns)"
`
`A;‘ (as)
`
`A,
`
`10"‘ .4, (ns)
`
`TXIUD
`TXI00
`Txtoo
`Tyloxapol
`Tyloxapol
`Tyloxapol
`Tyloxapold
`CIZEQ
`c,,E.,
`
`3.436
`3.436
`3.436
`3.418
`3.456
`3.418
`3.35
`3.2
`3.2
`
`25
`25
`40
`25
`40
`40
`55
`25
`40
`
`0.463 mM TCNPC
`0.528 mM DMBP
`0.523 mM DMBP
`0.570 M TPCNC
`0.590 mM nuns
`0.530 mM TPCNC
`1.236 mM TPCNC
`No quencher
`‘No quencher
`
`343.2 [24l.l]
`343.2 [241.1]
`329.2 [i91.t)"]
`349.5 [2s1.o]
`323.1 [225.4*]
`328.1 [225.4"]
`[£92.71
`345.6 [l8l.-1]
`321.3 [1353]
`
`317.1
`310.2
`268.4
`
`285.6
`292.1
`lS2.8
`
`0.750
`0.850
`1. 176
`
`0.427
`0.420
`1 .63
`
`4.13
`4.78
`4.57
`
`3.83
`420
`4.22
`
`N’
`
`106
`I04
`155
`
`63.8
`58.3
`99
`
`to" to {s‘ ')
`
`10"’ it, (s")
`
`3.95
`4.40
`4.07
`
`3.04
`3.46
`3.52
`
`2.3
`3.8
`5.0
`
`8.4
`7.4
`7.2
`
`" Values in brackets are for aerated solutions. The other values are for deaerated solutions.
`" Values at 41°C.
`" Values representing the number of surfactant hydrophobic moieties per rnicelle.
`“' This measurement has been performed on an air-saturated solution.
`
`for the microviscosity for C DE, are I17 and 49.8 ldlmol,
`respectively.
`Note that at a given temperature, the 1-,; values increase in
`the order CIZE9 < TX 100 < Tyloxapol, that is, in the order of
`increasing microviscosity,
`in the temperature range investi-
`gated. The values of the pyrene fluorescence lifetimes in aer-
`ated micellar solutions of the three surfactants listed in Table 1
`
`also increase in the order C DE‘, < TXIDO < Tyloxapo].
`However, Table I shows that identical values are found for the
`pyrene lifetime in deaerated micellar solutions,
`i.e.,
`in the
`absence of solubilized oxygen, of the three surfactants- This
`fact confirms that the differences in DPP excirner and pyrene
`lifetimes found for the aerated solutions of the three surfactants
`
`are due to a loss of efficiency in the quenching of the probe
`fluorescence by molecular oxygen, which increases with the
`micelle microviscosity, as previously discussed (7).
`The larger microviscosity of TX l 00 micelles with respect to
`micelles of ethoxylated nonionic surfactants C,,,E,, (E =
`ethoxy group) explains why abnormally low values of the
`micelle aggregation number were measured in a previous time-
`resolved fluorescence quenching study of TXIOO solutions
`(37). This study used the formation of excimer by pyrene (15).
`A later study (38) showed that the rate constant for inu'arr1i-
`cellar pyrene excimer formation is generally lower than the rate
`constant for pyrenc quenching by alkylpyridinium ions. This
`fact together with the high microviscosity of TXIOO resulted in
`decay plots where the linear part was not well developed. The
`fitting of Eq. [2] to the decay data yielded incorrect values of
`the fitting parameters and suggested a very rapid intermiccllar
`exchange of pyrene. In turn, the analysis of the fitting param-
`eters by means of Eqs.
`[2]—{S] yielded N values much lower
`than those obtained when using light scattering, for instance,
`particularly at low temperatures where the microviscosity of
`TX100 micelles is high.
`The microviscosity of the mixtures of TXIOO and Tyloxapoi
`and the DPP excinter lifetime in these mixtures have been
`
`measured at 45°C. The results are represented in Fig. 6 against
`the Tyloxapol weight fraction. The continuous increases of TE
`and -r,._1M/IF between pure TXIOO and Tyloxapol indicates the
`formation of mixed aggregates. This conclusion is supported
`by the results of Westesen er al. (13).
`
`Aggregation Numbers
`
`As discussed in the preceding paragraph the high tnicrovis-
`cosity of TX100 and Tyloxapol micelles makes it necessary to
`use very eificient quenchers of pyrene fluorescence in order to
`make reliable estimates of the micelle aggregation numbers of
`these two surfactants. In a first attempt we used the tetrade-
`cylpyridiniunt ion as quencher. With both TX100 and Tylen-
`apol the decay plots were nearly linear and did not permit any
`meaningful determination of aggregation numbers. We there-
`
`1600
`
`‘I400
`
`1200
`
`% 1000
`E:
`son
`000
`
`400
`
`200
`
`0.0
`
`0.2
`
`0.4
`
`0.8
`
`0.3
`
`140
`
`120
`
`E‘
`10!! :3
`
`E0
`
`.
`1.0
`
`Tyloxapol
`weight fraction
`‘DH 00
`FIG. 6. Variations of the mioelle microviseosity (O) and of the DPP
`excirner lifetime (0) for the TXl00-Tyloxapol n:1ixtures at 45°C, as a function
`of the Tyloxapol weight fraction in the mixture. Total surfactant concentration:
`EbO'l.Il 5 WW9.
`
`j‘‰‚“Ž‚ fyRQSQM q‚ˆ† W
`Innopharma EX1020, Page 6
`
`

`
`14
`
`REGEV AND ZANA
`
`1"
`
`"
`
`.'
`
`'
`
`-'.
`
`—'
`
`'
`
`-'
`
`.
`
`'.i.;“
`
`FIG. 7. Cryo-TEM micrograph of a 0.1 wt% Tyloxapol sample quenched from 25°C showing spheroidal micelles 5 nm in cliameter. Dark objects are frost
`panticies. Bar, 200 run.
`
`fore turned to the dirnethylbenzophenone (23) and the tetrade-
`cylcyanopyridinium ion (24) which are very efficient quench-
`ers of pyrene fluorescence. The resuits are summarized in
`Table I. The surfactant concentration used was fairly high in
`order to ensure that the probe was nearly completely parti-
`tioned in the micelles.
`
`The N values found for TXIOO with the two quenchers at
`25°C are identical within the experimental error. Also N in-
`creases much with temperature between 25 and 40°C, as for the
`nonionic surfactants C,,,E,, (3?—40). Our N values are in very
`good aggreement with those reported by Brown et at‘. (41), who
`used TRFQ with the pair pyrene—benzophenonc. They also
`agree with the value reported in a recent dynamic light scat-
`tering study (42).
`At 25°C the decay plots for Tyloxapol with the DMBP and
`TCNPC quenchers were close to linear and did not permit
`reliable estimates of aggregation number values. Recall that at
`this temperature the microviscosity of Tyloxapol micelles is
`still quite high and much larger than that of TXIOO. At 40 and
`55°C, however, the decays were sufficiently curved to permit
`reliable estimates of N. The N values thus obtained (see Table
`1) Show that N increases with temprature as for TX100. How-
`ever, the values for Tyloxapol are lower than those for TX 1 00,
`indicating smaller micelles. This result is at variance with that
`found for ionic surfactant oligoiners for which the micelle
`
`aggregation number, expressed as the number of alkyl chains
`per micelle, increased in going from the monomer to the dimer
`and trirner at a constant weight percent of surfactant (6, 43).
`However, Tyloxapol is an oligomer of larger oligomerization
`degree (up to seven) than those used so far. Also, as shown by
`the chromatogram in Fig. l, the sample used is polydisperse.
`Mixed micellization most likely takes place between the vari-
`ous oligomers and may result in spherical micelles. Recall that
`the mixture of dodecyltrirnethylarnmonium bromide (DTAB)
`which forms spherical micelles and of its dimer (denoted
`12-2-12) which forms giant thread~like micelles yields sphe-
`roidal micelles at a relatively low mole fraction of DTAB (44).
`The diameter of the hydrated Tyloxapol micelles has been
`calculated to be 6.3 nm, using an average value of 60 units for
`the aggregation number at 40°C, assuming a density of l for
`the aggregates (12), and an average hydration number of four
`water molecules per ethoxy group (45-49). A value of 7 nm
`was previously obtained (12) on the basis of distribution func-
`tion analysis (50) of small angle X-ray scattering data for
`Tyloxapol micelles at a concentration of 3 wt%.
`It is interesting to note that the values of the quenching rate
`
`constant, kc, for the Tyloxapol and TXIOO micelles are fairly
`close at 40°C (see Table 1). This is so because k9 is inversely
`proportional to the product of the microviscosity by the aggre-
`gation number (51-53). In the present case the higher micellar
`
`j‘‰‚“Ž‚ fyRQSQM q‚ˆ† X
`Innopharma EX1020, Page 7
`
`

`
`AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR OF TYLOXAPOL TN AQUEOUS SOLUTION
`
`15
`
`-
`-
`' 4"
`i‘
`_
`.
`.
`.
`
`FIG. 8. Cryo-TEM micrograph of a 15 w't% Tyloxapol sample quenched from 25°C. Dark objects are frost particles. Bar. 200 um.
`
`_
`'-$1-'-I
`
`s_..
`
`.
`
`.
`
`f.
`
`".-
`
`_‘_I‘
`
`-Q.
`
`'
`
`8-
`
`r ,_.
`
`micruviscosity of Tyloxapol with respect to TXIOO is largely
`compensated by the smaller rnicelle aggregation number of
`Tyioxapol with respect to TX100.
`The values of the exchange rate constant are fairly tour for
`both surfactants at 40°C. Exchange probably takes place
`through micellc collisions with temporary merging, as in mi-
`cellar solutions of CME,, surfactants (37-40).
`
`35 wt% Tyluxapol.“ The d spaL:i.ng calculated in this work
`
`(Fig. 2 of Ref. 12), 6 nm, is similar to the d spacing measured
`from our cryo-TEM image (Fig. 8).
`Below 0.] wt% we are unable to observe any form of
`aggregation in this system, most probably due to the low
`concentration of aggregates andfor their low aggregation num-
`her.
`
`Microsn-ucrure of the Solutions (Cr;va»1EM_)
`
`Cryo—TEM images of Tyloxapol at 0.1 wt% show spheroidal
`micelles 5 nm in diameter (Fig. 7). The diameter obtained
`confirms the preceding TRFQ results and also the small angle
`X-ray scattering (SAXS) results of Westesen and Koch (12).
`Note that in the cryo~TEM micrograph the micelles crowd in
`the thicker part of the vitrified film, close to the polymer
`support (21, '54, 55). Up to 10 wt% surfactant the micellar
`shape and size do not change much (not shown). However, at
`15 wt%, still in the micellar phase, some regions of ordered
`elongated micelles are observed (Fig. 8). It
`is tempting to
`believe that these regions are precursors of the hexagonal
`phase, appearing only at 35 wt% (1 1, I2). Indeed, this result is
`in line with Westesen findings from the evolution of peaks in
`SAXS spectra with increasing surfactant concentration (12)
`mentioned as “strong interparticle interference between 10 to
`
`For the sake of comparison and also because the microstruc-
`ture of solutions of TX100 has not yet been investigated by
`cryo-TEM, we h

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket