`Filed: February 9, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`INNOPHARMA LICENSING, INC., INNOPHARMA LICENSING LLC,
`INNOPHARMA INC., INNOPHARMA LLC,
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., and MYLAN INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.,
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case IPR2016-00089
`U.S. Patent 8,754,131
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00089
`U.S. Patent 8,754,131
`
`
`
`Further to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Senju Pharmaceutical Co.,
`
`Ltd., hereby submits a current listing of Senju Exhibits to counsel for Petitioners
`
`InnoPharma Licensing, Inc., InnoPharma Licensing LLC, InnoPharma Inc.,
`
`InnoPharma LLC, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Mylan Inc.
`
`Description
`Exhibits
`Exhibit 2001 Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated December 11,
`2015
`Exhibit 2002 Complaint, Senju Pharm. Co., Ltd. et al. v. InnoPharma
`Licensing, Inc. et al., No. 14-cv-06893 (D.N.J. Nov. 3,
`2014), ECF No. 1.
`Exhibit 2003 Answer, Separate Defenses and Counterclaims, Senju Pharm. Co.,
`Ltd. et al. v. InnoPharma Licensing, Inc. et al., No. 14-cv-06893
`(D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2015).
`Exhibit 2004 Email Correspondence from Maria Vignone to Counsel and the
`Board, dated December 9, 2015.
`Exhibit 2005 RESERVED
`Exhibit 2006 Email Correspondence between Innopharma and Senju, dated
`December 29, 2015 to February 2, 2016.
`Exhibit 2007 Email Correspondence between Innopharma and the Board, dated
`February 4 and 5, 2016
`Exhibit 2008 Senate Congressional Record S936-S953, Patent Reform Act of
`2011, dated February 28, 2011.
`Exhibit 2009 “Crossing the Finish Line on Patent Reform: What Can and
`Should Be Done” Hearing before the House Sub-Committeeon the
`Judiciary, dated February 11, 2011.
`Exhibit 2010 Mark-up of HR 1249, The America Invents Act, House of
`Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, dated April 14, 2011
`Exhibit 2011 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Report to Congress: Study and
`Report on the Implementation of the Leahy-Smith Invents Act,
`September 2015
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 9, 2016
`
`Case IPR2016-00089
`U.S. Patent 8,754,131
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /Bryan C. Diner/
`Bryan C. Diner, Lead Counsel
`Reg. No. 32,409
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
` & Dunner, L.L.P.
`901 New York Ave. NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case IPR2016-00089
`U.S. Patent 8,754,131
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owner’s Updated Exhibit List and Exhibits 2002 through 2011 were served on
`
`February 9, 2016, via email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioners at the
`
`following:
`
`Jitendra Malik
`jitty.malik@alston.com
`
`Hidetada James Abe
`james.abe@alston.com
`
`Lance Soderstrom
`lance.soderstrom@alston.com
`
`
`Date: February 9, 2016
`
`/Bradley J. Moore/
`Bradley J. Moore
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
`Dunner, LLP
`
`
`
`4